Temperature dependence of the volumetric parameters of drug binding to poly[d(A-T)].Poly[d(A-T)] and Poly(dA).Poly(dT)

We report the temperature and salt dependence of the volume change (DeltaVb) associated with the binding of ethidium bromide and netropsin with poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)]. The DeltaV(b) of binding of ethidium with poly(dA).poly(dT) was much more negative at temperatures approximately 70 degrees C than at 25 degrees C, whereas the difference is much smaller in the case of binding with poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)]. We also determined the volume change of DNA-drug interaction by comparing the volume change of melting of DNA duplex and DNA-drug complex. The DNA-drug complexes display helix-coil transition temperatures (Tm several degrees above those of the unbound polymers, e.g., the Tm of the netropsin complex with poly(dA)poly(dT) is 106 degrees C. The results for the binding of ethidium with poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)] were accurately described by scaled particle theory. However, this analysis did not yield results consistent with our data for ethidium binding with poly(dA).poly(dT). We hypothesize that heat-induced changes in conformation and hydration of this polymer are responsible for this behavior. The volumetric properties of poly(dA).poly(dT) become similar to those of poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)] at higher temperatures.     

Netropsin specifically recognizes one of the two conformationally equivalent strands of poly(dA).poly(dT). One dimensional NMR study at 500 MHz involving NOE transfer between netropsin and DNA protons

Recent observations that the heteronomous structural model for poly(dA).poly(dT) is not found in solution and that in this DNA, the two strands are conformationally equivalent (J. Biomole. Str. Dyns. 2, 1057 (1985], has added a new dimension to the structural dynamics of DNA-netropsin complex. Does the antibiotic somehow distinguish between the two strands and specifically interact with only one of the conformationally equivalent strands? Model-building studies suggest that netropsin can either bind to the dA-strand in the minor groove such that H-bonds are formed between the imino protons N4-H, N6-H, N8-H of netropsin and N3 atoms of A or can bind to the dT-strand in the minor groove and form H-bonds between the imino-protons N4-H, N6-H, N8-H of netropsin and O2 atoms of T. If netropsin binds to the dA-strand, AH2 atoms of poly(dA).poly(dT) would be in closer proximity to the imino protons N4-H, N6-H, N8-H and pyrrole ring protons C5-H, C11-H of netropsin than they would be, if netropsin binds to the dT-strand. In order to distinguish these possibilities experiments were conducted which involved NOE energy transfer between netropsin and DNA protons in the drug-DNA complex. Difference NOE spectra of netropsin-poly(dA).poly(dT) complex in which AH2 was irradiated indicate that dominant NOEs were observed at the imino and pyrrole ring protons of netropsin. When the netropsin pyrrole ring protons were irradiated, the magnetization transfer was at AH2 of DNA. These observations suggest that netropsin binds to the dA-strand of poly(dA).poly(dT) even though dA/dT strands are conformationally equivalent.     

Probing the hydration of the minor groove of A.T synthetic DNA polymers by volume and heat changes

The minor-groove ligand netropsin provides a sensitive probe of the hydration difference between poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly[d(AT)].poly[d(AT)]. We have measured the volume change delta V accompanying binding of netropsin to these polymers, using an improved magnetic suspension densimeter. For poly(dA).poly(dT) we find delta V = +97 mL/mol of bound netropsin at pH 7.0 and 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer. For poly[d(AT)].poly[d(AT)] we find delta V = -16 mL/mol of bound netropsin. This striking differential effect suggests that the poly(dA).poly(dT) duplex compresses more water (or is more extensively hydrated). From our enthalpy and entropy results we estimate the approximately 10 water molecules, immobilized in the minor groove of this system, are displaced by each netropsin bound. The volume increase, however, is substantially larger than can be explained by a simple melting of these immobilized water molecules in the minor groove. A decompression of at least 40 water molecules must attend the complexation to the poly(dA).poly(dT) duplex. This suggests that the conformation change attending the binding of the drug to this polymer duplex causes a further dehydration, whereas no such change in dehydration and configuration for the heteropolymer system is indicated.     

Poly(dA).poly(dT) exists in an unusual conformation under physiological conditions: propidium binding to poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)]

The binding of propidium to poly(dA).poly(dT) [poly(dA.dT)] and to poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)] [poly[d(A-T)2]] has been compared under a variety of solution conditions by viscometric titrations, binding studies, and kinetic experiments. The binding of propidium to poly[d(A-T)2] is quite similar to its binding to calf thymus deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). The interaction with poly(dA.dT), however, is quite unusual. The viscosity of a poly(dA.dT) solution first decreases and then increases in a titration with propidium at 18 degrees C. The viscosity of poly[d(A-T)2] shows no decrease in a similar titration. Scatchard plots for the interaction of propidium with poly(dA.dT) show the classical upward curvature for positive cooperativity. The curvature decreases as the temperature is increased in binding experiments. A van't Hoff plot of the observed binding constants yields an apparent positive enthalpy of approximately +6 kcal/mol for the propidium-poly(dA.dT) interaction. Propidium binding to poly[d(A-T)2] shows no evidence for positive cooperativity, and the enthalpy change for the reaction is approximately -9 kcal/mol. Both the magnitude of the dissociation constants and the effects of ionic strength are quite similar for the dissociation of propidium from poly(dA-T)2] and from poly[d(A-T)2], suggesting that the intercalated states are similar for the two complexes. The observed association reactions, under pseudo-first-order conditions, are quite different. Plots of the observed pseudo-first-order association rate constant vs. polymer concentration have much larger slopes for propidium binding to poly[d(A-T)2] than to poly(dA.dT).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Anomalous structure and properties of poly (dA).poly(dT). Computer simulation of the polynucleotide structure with the spine of hydration in the minor groove.

The results of the search for low-energy conformations of poly(dA).poly(dT) and of the poly(dA).poly(dT) "complex" with the spine of hydration similar to that found by Dickerson and co-workers (Kopka, M.L., Fratini, A.V., Drew, H.R. and Dickerson, R.E. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 163, 129-146) in the minor groove of the CGCGAATTCGCG crystals are described. It is shown that the existence of such a spine in the minor groove of poly(dA).poly(dT) is energetically favourable. Moreover, the spine of hydration makes the polynucleotide conformation similar to the poly(dA).poly(dT) structure in fibers and to the conformation of the central part of CGCGAATTCGCG in crystals; it also acquires features characteristic of the structure of poly(dA).poly(dT) and DNA oligo(dA)-tracts in solution. It is shown that the existence of the TpA step in conformations characteristic of the poly(dA).poly(dT) complex with the spine of hydration is energetically unfavourable (in contrast to the ApT step) and therefore this step should result in destabilization of the spine of hydration in the DNA minor groove. Thus, it appears that the spine of hydration as described by Dickerson and co-workers is unlikely to exist in the poly d(A-T).poly d(A-T) structure. The data obtained permit us to interpret a large body of experimental facts concerning the unusual structure and properties of poly(dA).poly(dT) and oligo(dA)-tracts in DNA both in fibers and in solution. The results provide evidence of the existence of the minor groove spine of hydration both in fibers and in solution on A/T tracts of DNA which do not contain the TpA step. The spine plays an active role in the formation of the anomalous conformation of these tracts.     

Two binding modes of netropsin are involved in the complex formation with poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT) and other alternating DNA duplex polymers

Using CD measurements we show that the interaction of netropsin to poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT) involves two binding modes at low ionic strength. The first and second binding modes are distinguished by a defined shift of the CD maximum and the presence of characteristic isodichroic points in the long wavelength range from 313 nm to 325 nm. The first binding mode is independent of ionic strength and is primarily determined by specific interaction to dA.dT base pairs. Employing a netropsin derivative and different salt conditions it is demonstrated that ionic contacts are essential for the second binding mode. Other alternating duplexes and natural DNA also exhibit more or less a second step in the interaction with netropsin observable at high ratio of ligand per nucleotide. The second binding mode is absent for poly(dA).poly(dT). The presence of a two-step binding mechanism is also demonstrated in the complex formation of poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT) with the distamycin analog consisting of pentamethylpyrrolecarboxamide. While the binding mode I of netropsin is identical with its localization in the minor groove, for binding mode II we consider two alternative interpretations.     

Structure of poly(dA).poly(dT) is not identical to the AT rich regions of the single crystal structure of CGCGAATTBrCGCG. The consequence of this to netropsin binding to poly(dA).poly(dT)

The basic assumption of Dickerson and Kopka (J. Biomole. Str. Dyns. 2, 423, 1985) that the conformation of poly(dA).poly(dT) in solution is identical to the AT rich region of the single crystal structure of the Dickerson dodecamer is not supported by any experimental data. In poly(dA).poly(dT), NOE and Raman studies indicate that the dA and dT units are conformationally equivalent and display the (anti-S-type sugar)-conformation; incorporation of this nucleotide geometry into a double helix leads to a conventional regular B-helix in which the width of the minor groove is 8A. The derived structure is consistent with all available experimental data on poly(dA).poly(dT) obtained under solution conditions. In the crystal structure of the dodecamer, the dA and dT units have distinctly different conformations-dA residues adopt (anti, S-type sugar pucker), while dT residues belong to (low anti, N-type sugar pucker). These different conformations of the dA and dT units along with the large propeller twist can be accommodated in a double helix in which the minor groove is shrunk from 8A to less than 4A. In the conventional right handed B-form of poly(dA).poly(dT) with the 8A wide minor groove, netropsin has to bind asymmetrically along the dA strand to account for the NOE and chemical shift data and to generate a stereochemically sound structure (Sarma et al, J. Biomole. Str. Dyns. 2, 1085, 1985).     

Netropsin Specifically Recognizes One of the Two Conformationally Equivalent Strands of Poly (dA)·Poly (dT). One Dimensional NMR Study at 500 MHz Involving NOE Transfer Between Netropsin and DNA Protons

Abstract

Recent observations that the heteronomous structural model for poly(dA)·poly(dT) is not found in solution and that in this DNA, the two strands are conformationally equivalent (J. Biomole. Str. Dyns. 2, 1057 (1985)), has added a new dimension to the structural dynamics of DNA-netropsin complex. Does the antibiotic somehow distinguish between the two strands and specifically interact with only one of the conformationally equivalent strands?

Model-building studies suggest that netropsin can either bind to the dA-strand in the minor groove such that H-bonds are formed between the imino protons N4-H, N6-H, N8-H of netropsin and N3 atoms of A or can bind to the dT-strand in the minor groove and form H-bonds between the imino-protons N4-H, N6-H, N8-H of netropsin and O2 atoms of T. If netropsin binds to the dA-strand, AH2 atoms of poly(dA)-poly(dT) would be in closer proximity to the imino protrons N4-H, N6-H, N8-H and pyrrole ring protons C5-H, Cll-H of netropsin than they would be, if netropsin binds to the dT-strand. In order to distinguish these possibilities experiments were conducted which involved NOE energy transfer between netropsin and DNA protons in the drug-DNA complex. Difference NOE spectra of netropsin·poly(dA)-poly(dT) complex in which AH2 was irradiated indicate that dominant NOEs were observed at the imino and pyrrole ring protons of netropsin. When the netropsin pyrrole ring protons were irradiated, the magnetization transfer was at AH2 of DNA. These observations suggest that netropsin binds to the dA-strand of poly(dA)-poly(dT) even though dA/dT strands are conformationally equivalent.     

Nuclear Overhauser data and stereochemical considerations suggest that netropsin binds symmetrically within the minor groove of poly(dA).poly(dT), forming hydrogen bonds with both strands of the double helix

Sarma et al. (J. Biomol. Str. and Dynam. 2, 1085 (1985) have proposed, on the basis of nuclear magnetic resonance experiments on the complex of netropsin with poly(dA).poly(dT), that the drug molecule lies asymmetrically along the dA side of the minor groove and makes hydrogen bonds only with the dA strand. If the crystal structure analyses of B-DNA (Fratini et al., J. Biol. Chem. 257, 14686 (1982] and of its complex with netropsin (Kopka et al., J. Mol. Biol. 183, 553 (1985] are any guide, this off-center, wide-groove model is stereochemically unlikely. More to the point, the off-center model is unnecessary to explain the observed nmr data. All of the nuclear Overhauser and other observations are fully explained by the structure seen in the x-ray crystal analysis, in which netropsin sits squarely centered within the minor groove, making bifurcated hydrogen bonds with both strands.     

fd gene 5 protein binds to double-stranded polydeoxyribonucleotides poly(dA.dT) and poly[d(A-T).d(A-T)]

Circular dichroism (CD) data indicated that fd gene 5 protein (G5P) formed complexes with double-stranded poly(dA.dT) and poly[d(A-T).d(A-T)]. CD spectra of both polymers at wavelengths above 255 nm were altered upon protein binding. These spectral changes differed from those caused by strand separation. In addition, the tyrosyl 228-nm CD band of G5P decreased more than 65% upon binding of the protein to these double-stranded polymers. This reduction was significantly greater than that observed for binding to single-stranded poly(dA), poly(dT), and poly[d(A-T)] but was similar to that observed for binding of the protein to double-stranded RNA [Gray, C.W., Page, G.A., & Gray, D.M. (1984) J. Mol. Biol. 175, 553-559]. The decrease in melting temperature caused by the protein was twice as great for poly[d(A-T).d(A-T)] as for poly(dA.dT) in 5 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrochloride (Tris-HCl), pH 7. Upon heat denaturation of the poly(dA.dT)-G5P complex, CD spectra showed that single-stranded poly(dA) and poly(dT) formed complexes with the protein. The binding of gene 5 protein lowered the melting temperature of poly(dA.dT) by 10 degrees C in 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7, but after reducing the binding to the double-stranded form of the polymer by the addition of 0.1 M Na+, the melting temperature was lowered by approximately 30 degrees C. Since increasing the salt concentration decreases the affinity of G5P for the poly(dA) and poly(dT) single strands and increases the stability of the double-stranded polymer, the ability of the gene 5 protein to destabilize poly(dA.dT) appeared to be significantly affected by its binding to the double-stranded form of the polymer.     

Interaction of the nonintercalative antitumour drugs SN-6999 and SN-18071 with DNA: influence of ligand structure on the binding specificity

Binding to DNA's of the non-intercalative ligands SN-6999 and SN-18071 has been studied by means of circular dichroism, UV absorption, thermal melting and for SN-6999 by viscosity measurements. Both antitumour drugs show a preference for dA.dT rich DNA's, but the base pair selectivity of SN-18071 is lower as indicated by some affinity to dG.dC containing duplex DNA. The dA.dT base pair specificity of SN-6999 is comparable to that of netropsin. It forms very stable complexes with dA.dT containing duplex DNA and competes with netropsin binding on DNA. The ligands SN-18071 and pentamidine are totally released from their complexes with poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT) by competitive netropsin binding. The results demonstrate that hydrogen bonding capacity of the ligand in addition to other factors strongly contribute to the base sequence specificity in the recognition process of the ligand with DNA. A binding model of SN-6999 with five dA.dT pairs in the minor groove of B-DNA is suggested.     

Hydration of dA.dT polymers: role of water in the thermodynamics of ethidium and propidium intercalation

We report differences in the interaction of two structurally similar phenanthroline intercalators, ethidium and propidium, with poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)] as a function of ionic strength based on titration microcalorimetry, fluorescence titration, and hydrostatic pressure measurements. Both ethidium and propidium bind more strongly to poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)] than to poly(dA).poly(dT). Ethidium intercalation into the latter polymer displays titrations with positive cooperativity; this is not found with propidium. The enthalpy of intercalation (delta H degrees) is exothermic for both dyes with poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)]; however, the value of this parameter is nearly zero in the case of poly(dA).poly(dT). The molar volume change (delta V degrees) accompanying dye intercalation is negative under all conditions for poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)] whereas it is positive for poly(dA).poly(dT). The changes observed in delta V degrees correlate well with the entropy changes derived from the titration and calorimetric data for this reaction. The results, interpreted in terms of the relative hydration of these two polymers, are consistent with a higher extent of hydration of poly(dA).poly(dT) relative to poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)].     

A molecular mechanical study of netropsin-DNA interactions

We present molecular mechanical calculations on the complexes of netropsin with dA₆·dT₆, d(TATATA)₂, d(CGCGCG)₂, and d(CGCGAATTCGCG)₂. The complexes were model built using computer graphics and then completely energy refined. Our calculations are consistent with the observed AT preference for netropsin and suggest that mixed sugar pucker geometries should be more stable than uniform in netropsin complexes with poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)] and poly(dA)·poly(dt). The netropsin·d(TATATA) and netropsin·dA₆·dT₆ complexes are significantly different in structure, leading to a possible reason why the observed thermodynamics of netropsin-association with poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)] and with poly(dA)·poly(dT) are so different. We also model built and energy refined a structure of netropsin-d(CGCGAATTCGCG)₂ using as a guide the nmr data of Patel [(1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79 , 6424–6428] and found a three-dimensional structure qualitatively consistent with the NOE enhancements observed by him. After our calculations were completed, we learned of an x-ray structure of a netropsin:d(CGCGAATTCGCG)₂ complex, and we compared the structure found in our calculation with the x-ray structure.     

Differences in melting behavior between homopolymers and copolymers of DNA: Role of nonbonded forces for GC and the role of the hydration spine and premelting transition for AT

Melting measurements of the mono-base-pair DNA polymers showed that the melting temperature T_m of the B-DNA homopolymer poly (dA ) · poly (dT) is higher than that of the copolymer poly [d(A-T)]. On the other hand, the T_mof the B-DNA homopolymer poly (dG) · poly (dC) is lower than that of the copolymer poly [d (G-C)]. From a structural point of view, the cross-strand base-stacking interaction in a DNA homopolymer is weaker than that in a DNA copolymer with the same base pair. One would then expect that all the DNA homopolymers are less stable than the copolymer with the same base pair. We find that the inversion of the melting order seen in the AT mono-base-pair DNA polymers is caused by the enhanced thermal stability of poly (dA) · poly (dT) from a well-defined spine of hydration attached to its minor groove. In this paper we employ the modified self-consistent phonon theory to calculate base-pair opening probabilities of four B-DNA polymers: poly(dA)-poly(dT), poly(dG) · poly(dC), poly[d(A-T)], and poly[d(G-C)] at temperatures from room temperature through the melting regions. Our calculations show that the spine of hydration can give the inverted melting order of the AT polymers as compared to the GC polymers in fair agreement with experimental measurements. Our calculated hydration spine disruption behavior in poly(dA) · poly(dT) at premelting temperatures is also in agreement with experimentally observed premelting transitions in poly (dA) · poly (dT). The work is in a sense a test of the validity of our models of nonbonded interactions and spine of hydration interactions. We find we have to develop the concept of a strained bond to fit observations in poly (dA) · poly(dT). The strained-bond concept also explains the otherwise anomalous stability of the hydration chain. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Acoustical investigation of poly(dA).poly(dT), poly[d(A-T)], poly(A).poly(U) and DNA hydration in dilute aqueous solutions.

Apparent molar adiabatic compressibilities and apparent molar volumes of poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)], poly(dA).poly(dT), DNA and poly(A).poly(U) in aqueous solutions were determined at 1 degree C. The change of concentration increment of the ultrasonic velocity upon replacing counter ion Cs+ by the Mg2+ ion was also determined for these polymers. The following conclusions have been made: (1) the hydration of the double helix of poly(dA).poly(dT) is remarkably larger than that of other polynucleotides; (2) the hydration of the AT pair in the B-form DNA is larger than that of the GC pair; (3) the substitution of Cs+ for Mg2+ ions as counter ions results in a decrease of hydration of the system polynucleotide plus Mg2+, and (4) the magnitude of this dehydration depends on the nucleotide sequence; the following rule is true: the lesser is a polynucleotide hydration, the larger dehydration upon changing Cs+ for Mg2+ ions in the ionic atmosphere of polynucleotide.     

A hydrogen exchange study of the open segment in a DNA double helix

The kinetics of the hydrogen-deuterium exchange reactions of double-helical poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)], poly(dA)·poly(dT), and constituent nucleosides (deoxyadenosine and thymidine) have been examined at various temperatures by stopped-flow ultraviolet spectrophotometry, in the spectral region 240–300 nm. The results were interpreted on the basis of a mechanism of the hydrogen exchange reaction of a helical polynucleotide, proposed by Englander and colleagues as well as by the Tsuboi and Nakanishi group. It was concluded that the rates of the base-pair opening reactions are nearly equal to one another in double-helical DNAs, irrespective of the base sequence. On the other hand, the free energy required for bringing the open segment at a particular base-pair was found to be much greater for poly(dA)·poly(dT) than for poly[d(A-T)]· poly[d(A-T)].     

Binding of netropsin to a DNA triple helix.

The interaction of netropsin, a minor groove binding drug, with T-A-T triple helix and A-T double helix was studied using circular dichroism spectroscopy and thermal denaturation. The triple helix was made by an oligonucleotide (dA)12-x-(dT)12-x-(dT)12, where x is a hexaethylene glycol chain bridged between the 3' phosphate of one strand and the 5' phosphate of the following strand. This oligonucleotide is able to fold back on itself to form a very stable triplex. Changing the conditions allows the same oligonucleotide in a duplex form with a (dT)12 dangling arm. Circular dichroism spectroscopy demonstrates that netropsin can bind to the triple helical structure. Spectral analysis shows that the bound drug exhibits a conformation and an environment similar in double-stranded and in triple-stranded structure. However, the binding constant to the triple-stranded structure is found smaller than the binding constant to the double-stranded one. Thermal denaturation experiments demonstrate that netropsin destabilizes the triplex whereas it stabilizes the duplex.     

Infrared dichroism of polynucleotides of repeated sequence. I. Poly(dA)·poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)]

Infrared dichroism measurements of oriented films of poly(dA)·poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)] have been made under the conditions of low salts content and high humidity for which the geometry is known. The angles which the transition moments make with the helix axis are compared with the orientations of the corresponding bonds. Except for the in-plane base model of poly[(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)], there is no agreement. This may imply either that a model which assumes bonds and transition moments to be colinear is not acceptable or that x-ray data are inaccurate. These possibilities are discussed especially with respect to phosphate group orientation. An appendix gives the derivations of dichroic-ratio expressions for helical molecules of different symmetry types.     

Effect of cesium on the volume of the helix-coil transition of dA.dT polymers and their ligand complexes

The pressure dependence of the helix–coil transition of poly(dA)∙poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)] in aqueous solutions of NaCl and CsCl at concentrations between 10 and 200 mM is reported and used to calculate the accompanying volume change. We also investigated the binding parameters and volume change of ethidium bromide binding with poly(dA)∙poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)] in aqueous solutions of these two salts. The volume change of helix–coil transition of poly(dA)∙poly(dT) in Cs⁺-containing solutions differs by less than 1 cm³ mol^− 1 from the value measured when Na⁺ is the counter-ion. We propose that this insensitivity towards salt type arises if the counter-ions are essentially fully hydrated around DNA and the DNA conformation is not significantly altered by salt types. Circular dichroism spectroscopy showed that the previously observed large volumetric disparity for the helix–coil transition of poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)] in solutions containing Na⁺ and Cs⁺ is likely result of a Cs⁺-induced conformation change that is specific for poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)]. This cation-specific conformation difference is mostly absent for poly(dA)∙poly(dT) and EB bound poly[d(A-T)]·poly[d(A-T)].     

Binding of nonintercalative antitumor drugs to DNA-polymers: structural effects of bisquaternary ammonium heterocycles

The binding of the antitumor agents SN-16814 nd SN-13232 to various DNA's in solution was monitored by CD and UV absorption measurements. In addition comparative studies with dA.dT containing duplex DNA of the related ligands SN-6136 and SN-6324 were included with respect to effects of structural variations. In general all four ligands show a dA.dT preference in their binding affinity to DNA. Differences were observed for the reaction of SN-16814 which contains bicyclic ring system: it has a lower base pair selectivity, shows some affinity to poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC), poly(rA).poly(rU) and poly(rU). The binding mechanism of SN-16814 is associated with a significant time dependent binding effect in CD spectra and UV absorption in case of reaction with poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly(dI).poly(dC) indicating a slow kinetics. The preferred binding to dA.dT base pairs in DNA decreases in the order from SN-61367 greater than SN-13232 greater than SN-6324,SN-16814 as judged from CD titration studies, salt dissociation and melting temperature data. Competitive binding experiments with netropsin (Nt) or distamycin-5 revealed that SN-16814 and SN-13232 are displaced from poly(dA.dT).poly(dA-dT) suggesting that both ligands are less strongly bound than Nt and Dst-5 within the minor groove of B-DNA. These studies are consistent with results of the DNAse I cleavage of poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT) which show the same relative order of inhibition of the cleavage reaction due to ligand binding. The results suggest that the variability of the DNA binding and dA.dT sequence specificity may reside in the adaptability of benzamide-type ligands in the helical groove which is influenced by distinct structural modifications of the ligand conformation.