Chemotherapy versus supportive care alone in pediatric palliative care for cancer: comparing the preferences of parents and health care professionals

Background:

The choice between palliative chemotherapy (defined as the use of cytotoxic medications delivered intravenously for the purpose of our study) and supportive care alone is one of the most difficult decisions in pediatric oncology, yet little is known about the preferences of parents and health care professionals. We compared the strength of these preferences by considering children’s quality of life and survival time as key attributes. In addition, we identified factors associated with the reported preferences.

Methods:

We included parents of children whose cancer had no reasonable chance of being cured and health care professionals in pediatric oncology as participants in our study. We administered separate interviews to parents and to health care professionals. Visual analogue scales were shown to respondents to illustrate the anticipated level of the child’s quality of life, the expected duration of survival and the probability of cure (shown only to health care professionals). Respondents were then asked which treatment option they would favour given these baseline attributes. In addition, respondents reported what factors might affect such a decision and ranked all factors identified in order of importance. The primary measure was the desirability score for supportive care alone relative to palliative chemotherapy, as obtained using the threshold technique.

Results:

A total of 77 parents and 128 health care professionals participated in our study. Important factors influencing the decision between therapeutic options were child quality-of-life and survival time among both parents and health care professionals. Hope was particularly important to parents. Parents significantly favoured chemotherapy (42/77, 54.5%) compared with health care professionals (20/128, 15.6%; p < 0.0001). The opinions of the physician and child significantly influenced the parents’ desire for supportive care; for health care professionals, the opinions of parents and children were significant factors influencing this decision.

Interpretation:

Compared with health care professionals, parents more strongly favour aggressive treatment in the palliative phase and rank hope as a more important factor for making decisions about treatment. Understanding the differences between parents and health care professionals in the relative desirability of supportive care alone may aid in communication and improve end-of-life care for children with cancer.Despite the substantial improvements in rates of cure among children with cancer, some children will have progressive or recurrent disease and will die.¹ Cancer remains the second most common cause of death for North American children between 5 and 14 years of age.^2–4 When cure becomes unlikely, parents and health care professionals are often faced with the decision to continue further aggressive treatments or to provide relief from symptoms alone.¹The choice between palliative chemotherapy and supportive care alone is one of the most important and difficult decisions for parents of children whose disease cannot be cured.⁵ At this point, the goals of therapy are usually to maximize the child’s quality and length of life and to ensure respect for the family’s and child’s preferences.⁶Given the difficult nature of this decision, it is worthwhile to compare and contrast the perspectives of parents and health care professionals. Discordance in these perspectives could heighten the anxiety felt by patients and parents and might lead to their dissatisfaction with the care received. One qualitative study that interviewed parents of children with recurrent cancer found that “fearing disagreement with staff” was an important negative factor in decision-making.⁷ However, little is known as to whether the attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward therapeutic options are congruent.The goal of this study was to compare the strength of preference between parents and health care professionals for supportive care alone versus palliative chemotherapy for children whose cancer has no reasonable chance of being cured, and to determine how specific factors affect these preferences.     

Optimal Sequence of Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin-Based Regimens in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Observational Study

The optimal sequence of irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear. We conducted a population-based observational study by retrospectively reviewing records from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database to explore this issue. Patients aged ≥20 years with metastatic colorectal cancer newly diagnosed between 2004 and 2008 (n = 9490) were enrolled in current study. Among these 9490 patients, 3895 patients (41.04%) did not receive any chemotherapy within the first three months after catastrophic illness registration. Patients who received best supportive care were older and had higher Charlson comorbidity indexes and incidences of comorbidities than those who received irinotecan-based regimens, oxaliplatin-based regimens, and 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine alone. Patients who received irinotecan followed by oxaliplatin-based regimens and those who received the reverse sequence were further stratified into arm A (n = 542) and arm B (n = 1156), respectively. The median first time to next treatment was not significantly different between arm A and arm B (210 days vs. 196 days; p = 0.17). However, the median second time to next treatment was longer in arm A than in arm B (155 days vs. 123 days; p = 0.006), which translated into a better overall survival (487 days vs. 454 days; p = 0.02). The crossover rate was higher in arm A than in arm B (47.84% vs. 41.61%; p<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that overall survival was comparable between the two chemotherapy sequences (p = 0.27). Our study suggested that irinotecan followed by oxaliplatin-based regimens might be a better chemotherapy treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer than the reverse sequence given the higher crossover rate and potential overall survival benefit.     

Music therapy in supportive cancer care

The purpose of this paper is to show some aspects of music therapy application in cancer care and to present the integration of music therapy program into a continuous supportive cancer care for inpatients. A cancer diagnosis is one of the most feared and serious life events that causes stress in individuals and families. Cancer disrupts social, physical and emotional well-being and results in a range of emotions, including anger, fear, sadness, guilt, embarrassment and shame. Music therapy is a part of a complementary medicine program in supportive cancer care which accompanies medical treatment. There are many benefits of music therapy for cancer patients—interactive music therapy techniques (instrumental improvisation, singing) as well as receptive music therapy techniques (listening to recorded or live music, music and imaginary) can be used to improve mood, decrease stress, pain, anxiety level and enhance relaxation. Music therapy is an effective form of supporting cancer care for patients during the treatment process. It may be also basic for planning effective programs of rehabilitation to promote wellness, improve physical and emotional well-being and the quality of life.     

射波刀立体定向放疗技术治疗结直肠癌肝转移癌的疗效观察

目的:探讨射波刀立体定向放疗技术治疗结直肠癌肝转移癌的疗效观察。方法:选择2014年1月至2016年2月我院收治的64例结直肠癌肝转移癌患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法随机分为对照组(32例)和治疗组(32例),对照组患者给予FOLFOX6全身化疗方案,治疗组患者给予FOLFOX6全身化疗和肝脏病灶立体定向放疗(射波刀)治疗。观察患者的治疗3个月后的近期临床疗效和不良反应,6个月后患者生存率和局部控制率,并评价患者的生活质量。结果:治疗3个月后,治疗组患者的总有效率为78.13%,高于对照组的53.13%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗6个月后,治疗组的生存率(96.88%)和局部控制率(87.50%)均高于对照组(81.25%和65.63%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗6个月后,治疗组患者的情绪功能、认知功能、角色功能、躯体功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者的不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:射波刀立体定向放疗技术治疗结直肠癌肝转移癌具有较好的近期临床疗效,可提高患者的生存率和局部控制率,改善患者生活质量,且不良反应发生率低,值得临床推广应用。     

Multimodality Treatment May Improve the Survival Rate of Patients with Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Good Performance Status

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefit of chemotherapy, combined with palliative radiotherapy (PRT) and other local treatments to the metastatic sites, for patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who had a performance status 0–2. We conducted a retrospective review of available data from 197 biopsy-proven NPC patients who developed metastasis after their initial definitive treatment. These patients were grouped into three categories according to the different treatment paths that were followed: the best supportive care (64 patients), chemotherapy alone (55 patients), and multimodality treatment with chemotherapy combined with PRT and other local treatments to metastatic sites (78 patients). The 2-year metastatic survival rate of patients in the multimodality treatment group was 57.7%, which was significantly better than that of the patients in both the chemotherapy alone group and the best supportive care group (32.7% and 1.6%, respectively). The independent significant factors affecting survival were the disease-free interval prior to the detection of metastatic disease, the number of metastases, the number of chemotherapy cycles and the biological effective dose of PRT. In conclusion, multimodality treatment may improve survival of select patients with recurrent NPC with distant metastases.     

Erythropoietin for oncology supportive care

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), the prototype erythropoiesis-stimulating agent developed in the 1980s, was among the first recombinant human proteins to be marketed for clinical use in the oncology setting. Anemia is a frequent concern in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and the availability of rhEPO as an alternative to red blood cell transfusions to treat symptomatic anemia created excitement among clinicians, particularly during an era of mounting concern for transfusion-transmissible infections. Early studies of rhEPO for chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with non-myeloid malignancies showed these agents improved hemoglobin levels and reduced transfusion rates. rhEPO therapy was reported to decrease fatigue and improve quality of life, although the magnitude and clinical meaningfulness of these effects have been debated. More recent clinical trials since 2003 linking rhEPO therapy to increased risk of tumor progression, thrombo-vascular events and mortality prompted implementation of use restrictions to minimize potential for harm. Scientific research to understand the basic mechanisms of the biologic effects of erythropoietin at the cellular receptor and signaling level has revealed pleiotropic cytokine effects extending beyond erythropoiesis regulation. The importance of erythropoietin receptor signaling in normal, non-erythroid tissues and in pre-clinical tumor models has been under intense investigation and scrutiny, as potential mechanisms of the adverse outcomes associated with rhEPO therapy have been debated. Further research will be required to clarify the complex interplay between the diverse hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic effects of erythropoietin in normal and malignant tissues and to optimize the clinical use of rhEPO in the supportive care of cancer patients.     

小剂量环磷酰胺联合参一胶囊治疗进展期非小细胞肺癌

目的：应用小剂量环磷酰胺（CTX）联合参一胶囊治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌,观察其临床疗效及毒副作用。方法：Ⅲ、Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者经标准化、放疗后随机分为两组,治疗组（38例）：CFX 50mg每日一次、参一胶囊20mg日两次口服,三至六个月;对照组（34例）：化疗后不用任何药物治疗。结果：联合治疗组患者外周血血管内皮生长因子（VEGF）表达下降。T淋巴细胞亚群CD4＋及CD4＋／CD8＋升高,病人生存质量及生存期提高。结论：Ⅲ、Ⅳ期NSCLC患者化疗后联合应用小剂量CTX联合参一胶囊治疗是一种安全有效的治疗方法,可以提高患者的生存质量及生存期。     

Supportive therapy of lung cancer patients

The effectiveness of cancer treatment given to lung cancer patients is indicated by the asymptomatic and non-toxic survival time. The goal is not to prolong the patients' suffering, but to lengthen the duration of the best quality of life lived (Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity-TWIST). Supportive care is the prevention and management of side effects which occur during therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery) given to patients suffering from cancer. Supportive care is the widespread activity of doctors, nurses and social workers, including psychosocial assistance and rehabilitation through the various stages of illness till death. Though palliative therapy is understood to be the high level and professional treatment of terminally ill patients in those cases where curative measures are not possible anymore, supportive and palliative treatment often overlap (e.g. pain control, cachexia, obstructive syndromes). Palliative care is part of supportive therapy. The goal of supportive care is to reduce the patients' subjective symptoms to the minimum ("well being") during therapy, follow up and consequently until death. The essence of supportive care is to keep the patients' quality of life on the highest possible level. This article summarizes the pathophysiology, prevention and therapy of the most frequently occuring side effects observed during the management of lung cancer patients.     

Prospective analysis of KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 treatment regimens

Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, has proven to be efficient in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We made a prospective study of the efficacy and toxicities of cetuximab-combination first-line (FOLFOX4) versus second/third-line (FOLFIRI) chemotherapy in 98 KRAS wild-type patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer. Wild-type KRAS had been identified by direct sequencing. Associations between clinical response/progression-free survival/overall survival/toxicities and cetuximab-combination chemotherapy timing were evaluated. The overall response rate was significantly higher for first-line treatment than for second/third-line treatment (relative risk = 1.707, 95% confidence interval = 1.121-2.598). Both progression-free survival and overall survival indicated significantly longer survival of first-line treatment than second/third-line treatment patients. This study is a validation of a molecular analysis of KRAS wild-type status for the prediction of response to cetuximab-combination chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients; its predictive role was less prominent in the second/third-line than in the first-line treatment patients.     

Fadrozole hydrochloride, a new nontoxic aromatase inhibitor for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Eighty previously treated postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive fadrozole (CGS 16 949A), a new aromatase inhibitor, 1 or 4 mg orally per day. Seventy eight patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only mild to moderate toxicity, namely hot flushes (28%), nausea and vomiting (13%), fatigue (8%) and loss of appetite (5%) occurred. Complete response was documented in 10% and partial response in 13% of patients with 45% having a no change status for at least 2 months. The median time to treatment failure is 4.1 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The response and survival in patients with estrogen receptor positive and estrogen receptor unknown disease were not significantly different. Neither response nor survival was significantly different between the patients receiving 1 or 4 mg of fadrozole per day. Fadrozole is a well tolerated, effective second line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.     

Chemotherapy and molecular therapy in cervical cancer

In recent years, the treatment of locally-advanced and metastatic cervical cancer has improved greatly due to the introduction of targeted therapies, new chemotherapy combinations, and emerging treatments. Candidates for potentially curative treatment are those patients with good functional status without associated comorbidities. Numerous trials have demonstrated that chemotherapy prolongs survival versus supportive care alone. In addition, polychemotherapy schemes are superior to single agent regimens. Targeted molecular agents have proven beneficial in the treatment of cervical cancer. Second-line treatment should be considered standard practice in patients with good functional status. Finally, given the poor survival outcomes in patients with metastatic disease, participation in clinical studies should always be considered the best option.     

Gemcitabine in the first and second-line chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Aim of this study was to estimate efficacy of gemcitabine in first and the second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (stage III and IV). In first-line chemotherapy, 120 patients were treated with different chemotherapy regimens. Fifty-nine patients were treated with gemcitabine / cisplatin (PG), 41 with cisplatin / etoposide (PE) and 20 with mitomycin / ifosfamide / cisplatin (MIC). Forty patients, unsuccessfully treated with PE and MIC in first-line therapy were treated with PG (24 pts) and with best supportive care (BSC) (16 pts). In first-line therapy PG was superior to PE and MIC protocol (mean survival (MS) 10 vs. 7 vs. 8.5 months). Response rate (RR) for PG in first-line therapy was 46% and 21% in second-line. We showed also significantly better survival in patients treated with PG in second-line chemotherapy comparing to best supportive care (MS 9 vs. 5.5 months). Toxic side effects for combination PG was acceptable. This study confirmed that PG combination is safe and effective as first and second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.     

Clinical Significance of Frizzled Homolog 3 Protein in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Frizzled homolog 3 receptor was up-regulated in several gastrointestinal cancers such as esophageal and gastric cancers. Moreover, frizzled homolog 3 has recently reported to be expressed in colorectal adenoma specimens. In the present study, we investigated the clinical significance of frizzled homolog 3 protein in colorectal cancer patients. Using immunocytochemical staining, frizzled homolog 3 expression was examined in 186 colorectal cancer specimens, 79 colorectal adenoma specimens, 133 colorectal polyp specimens, 127 colorectal cancer specimens with lymph node and/or distant metastasis, 310 specimens of various non-colorectal cancer metastatic carcinomas and 40 specimens with simultaneous occurrence of colorectal cancer, colorectal adenoma and colorectal polyp. Statistical analysis was used to correlate frizzled homolog 3 protein expression to the clinicohistopathological factors, recurrence/metastasis and survival after follow-up for 42 months in colorectal cancer patients. Frizzled homolog 3 protein was expressed in 100% colorectal cancer specimens, 89% colorectal adenoma specimens, 75% colorectal polyp specimens and 69% normal colorectal epithelial tissues. Moreover, frizzled homolog 3 immunocytochemical scores were highly correlated with colorectal cancer progression. Furthermore, frizzled homolog 3 was expressed in a comparatively lower percentage of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma with focal and very weak staining than other metastatic tumor types. On the other hand, the frizzled homolog 3 immunocytochemical scores of colorectal adenomas with synchronous colorectal carcinomas were significantly higher than those of pure colorectal adenomas. Statistical analysis showed that frizzled homolog 3 immunocytochemical scores were associated with Dukes stage and lymph node status. Finally, stratified groups of colorectal cancer patients had significant differences in their recurrence/metastasis and survival. In conclusion, the present large-scale study has clearly showed that frizzled homolog 3 protein can generate clinically important information for colorectal cancer patients.     

High BRAF Mutation Frequency and Marked Survival Differences in Subgroups According to KRAS/BRAF Mutation Status and Tumor Tissue Availability in a Prospective Population-Based Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Cohort

RAS and BRAF mutations impact treatment and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC), but the knowledge is based on trial patients usually not representative for the general cancer population. Patient characteristics, treatment and efficacy according to KRAS, BRAF and MSI status were analyzed in a prospectively collected unselected population-based cohort of 798 non-resectable mCRC patients. The cohort contained many patients with poor performance status (39% PS 2-4) and elderly (37% age>75), groups usually not included in clinical trials. Patients without available tissue micro array (TMA) (42%) had worse prognostic factors and inferior survival (all patients; 7m vs 11m, chemotherapy-treated;12m vs 17m). The 92 patients (21%) with BRAF mutation had a poor prognosis regardless of microsatellite instability, but receipt of 1-2^nd chemotherapy was similar to wildtype BRAF patients. Median survival in this cohort varied from 1 month in BRAF mutated patients not given chemotherapy to 26 months in wildtype KRAS/BRAF patients <75 years in good PS. TMA availability, BRAF mutation and KRAS mutation were all independent prognostic factors for survival. The observed 21% BRAF mutation incidence is higher than the previously and repeatedly reported incidence of 5-12% in mCRC. Screening for BRAF mutations before selection of treatment is relevant for many patients, especially outside clinical trials. A BRAF mutation only partly explained the very poor prognosis of many mCRC patients. Survival in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer patients is extremely variable and subgroups have an extremely short survival compared to trial patients. Patients without available TMA had worse prognostic factors and shorter survival, which questions the total generalizability of present TMA studies and implies that we lack information on the biologically worst mCRC cases. Lack of available tissue is an important underexposed issue which introduces sample bias, and this should be recognized more clearly when conclusions are made from translational mCRC studies.     

贝伐单抗二线治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床观察

目的:观察贝伐单抗二线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的临床疗效和毒副反应。方法:回顾性分析2008年8月至2011年10月我院经组织病理学证实的转移性结直肠癌患者21例,一线治疗进展后,二线治疗方案中加用贝伐单抗,用法为5mg/kg,每2-3周1次,与化疗方案同步。化疗方案以奥沙利铂及伊立替康为基础,完成2-3周期治疗后评定疗效,观察毒副反应。结果:21例患者中PR1例,SD11例,PD9例,客观缓解率为4.8%,疾病控制率为57.1%,中位TTP为3.7个月。患者出现的不良反应有骨髓抑制、皮疹、恶心呕吐、腹泻、肝功能损害、神经毒性等,贝伐单抗所致高血压的发生率为14.3%(3/21),鼻衄发生率为4%(2/21)。结论:二线治疗中使用贝伐单抗,对一线治疗进展后的转移性结直肠癌疗效有限,毒副反应可耐受。     

Adoptive γδT-cell transfer alone or combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer

Background aimsAfter therapy with platinum, 5-fluorouracil and taxane, no further recommended therapy is available for recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (r/mEC). Here the authors report two phase 1 trials of adoptive γδT-cell therapy, one for treatment-refractory r/mEC (γδT-monotherapy-P1, UMIN000001419) and the other for r/mEC with no prior systemic therapy (DCF-γδT-P1, UMIN000008097).MethodsFor γδT-monotherapy-P1, patients received four weekly and four biweekly injections of autologous γδT cells. For DCF-γδT-P1, patients received docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (60 mg/m²) and cisplatin (60 mg/m²) on day 1 and continuous injection of 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m²/day) on days 1–5 of each 28-day cycle; additionally, they received autologous γδT-cell injections on day 15 and day 22 of each cycle.ResultsTwenty-six patients were enrolled for γδT-monotherapy-P1. No severe adverse events were associated with γδT-cell therapy. Median overall survival was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–10.0), and median progression-free survival was 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.7–2.8). Eighteen patients received DCF-γδT-P1. All treatment-related adverse events were associated with DCF chemotherapy, not γδT injection. Median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 6.7–not reached), and median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.5–5.7). The response rate and disease control rate were 39% and 78%, respectively.ConclusionsThe use of γδT-cell immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy was safe and feasible for r/mEC patients. Although the authors failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit of γδT-monotherapy-P1, survival benefits were observed in the DCF-γδT-P1 trial.     

Urinary neopterin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

In previous studies, mostly in patients with early stage colorectal carcinoma, neopterin, an indicator of systemic immune activation, has been associated with poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate urinary neopterin in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with chemotherapy. A retrospective analysis was performed of urinary neopterin, determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, in 88 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Peripheral blood cell count and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were determined in 72 patients before the start of chemotherapy. Urinary neopterin in colorectal carcinoma patients was significantly increased compared to controls, but lower than in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Neopterin correlated significantly with serum CEA, age, peripheral blood leukocyte and platelet counts. The median survival of colorectal carcinoma patients with urinary neopterin below 214 micromol/mol creatinine was significantly longer compared to that of patients with higher neopterin concentrations (median 18 vs 5 months, log-rank test p=0.003). CEA and hemoglobin were also associated with survival in univariate analysis, but in multivariate analysis only urinary neopterin and serum CEA were independent predictors of survival. High urinary neopterin during follow-up was also predictive of poor prognosis.     

Cyclical Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Carcinoma

Twenty-five patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were treated with the combination of methotrexate 60 mg/M² and 5-fluorouracil 700 mg/M² intravenously on the first and eighth days, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/M² and prednisone 40 mg/M² by mouth daily for the first 14 days of a 28-day cycle. The patients had had no previous chemotherapy or extensive radiotherapy and all but two had not responded to hormonal therapy or endocrine ablation. The major metastatic lesions were: lung (12 patients), liver (four patients), bone (four patients), soft tissue (three patients), nodes (two patients). Seventeen of the 25 patients (68%) responded to treatment with seven complete remissions; these included patients suffering metastatic lesions in the lung, nodes, and soft tissue. The overall median duration of response was nine months (range 6-26 months). Toxicity was primarily haematological, but the group received an average of at least 75% of their calculated dose for each monthly cycle. Haematological toxicity was most pronounced in patients with liver dysfunction and bone marrow involvement. Out of eight nonresponders seven died, with a median survival of six months. Only six of 17 responders died, and the median survival in this group will exceed thirteen months. There was no correlation between the length of the metastasis-free interval after previous treatment and subsequent response to chemotherapy.     

Phase II study of recombinant interferon alpha-C in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Recombinant interferon alpha-C is a new strain of the alpha interferon family. It was given to 33 patients with measurable metastatic renal cell carcinoma of whom 31 were evaluable. Protocol consisted of 3 million U/d for 2 weeks, then 3 million U/m2 every other day until progression. No complete response was observed. Three patients (9.7%) had partial response for a mean duration of 5.6 months and eight patients (25.8%) were stabilized for a mean of 4.3 months. Responsive sites were mainly lung, bone, and kidney, while side effects were generally mild. better results were observed in previously nephrectomized patients who had not received chemotherapy or hormonotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease (p less than 0.05), and also in patients with a brief disease-free interval and short delay from presenting symptoms of the primary tumor until interferon treatment (p less than 0.05). Median survival was significantly longer in responders than in progressors (p less than 0.05). We suggest that the efficacy of recombinant interferon alpha-C in a low-dose regime versus other types of interferon as first-line therapy for inoperable, metastatic, or locally recurrent renal cell carcinoma should be investigated in a prospective, controlled, randomized study.     

Marker rhythms of circadian system function: a study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and good performance status

Cancer patients may exhibit normal or altered circadian rhythms in tumor and healthy tissues. Four rhythms known to reflect circadian clock function were studied in 18 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and good performance status. Rest-activity was monitored by wrist actigraphy for 72 h before treatment, and its circadian rhythm was estimated by an autocorrelation coefficient at 24h and a dichotomy index that compared the activity level when in and out of bed. Blood samples (9-11 time points, 3-6 h apart) were drawn on day 1 and day 4 of the first course of chronochemotherapy (5-fluorouracil: 800 mg/m2/day; folinic acid: 300 mg/m2/day; oxaliplatin: 25 mg/m2/day). Group 24h rhythms were validated statistically for plasma concentrations of melatonin, 6-alpha-sulfatoxymelatonin, and cortisol and for lymphocyte counts. Significant individual 24h rhythms were displayed in melatonin by 15 patients, cortisol by seven patients, lymphocytes by five patients, and prominent circadian rhythms in activity were displayed by 10 patients; only one patient exhibited significant rhythms in all the variables. The results suggest the rhythms of melatonin, cortisol, lymphocytes, and rest/activity reflect different components of the circadian system, which may be altered differently during cancer processes. Such 24h rhythm alterations appeared to be independent of conventional clinical factors.