Effects of multidisciplinary integrated care on quality of care in residential care facilities for elderly people: a cluster randomized trial

Background:

Sophisticated approaches are needed to improve the quality of care for elderly people living in residential care facilities. We determined the effects of multidisciplinary integrated care on the quality of care and quality of life for elderly people in residential care facilities.

Methods:

We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 10 residential care facilities in the Netherlands that included 340 participating residents with physical or cognitive disabilities. Five of the facilities applied multidisciplinary integrated care, and five provided usual care. The intervention, inspired by the disease management model, consisted of a geriatric assessment of functional health every three months. The assessment included use of the Long-term Care Facility version of the Resident Assessment Instrument by trained nurse-assistants to guide the design of an individualized care plan; discussion of outcomes and care priorities with the family physician, the resident and his or her family; and monthly multidisciplinary meetings with the nurse-assistant, family physician, psychologist and geriatrician to discuss residents with complex needs. The primary outcome was the sum score of 32 risk-adjusted quality-of-care indicators.

Results:

Compared with the facilities that provided usual care, the intervention facilities had a significantly higher sum score of the 32 quality-of-care indicators (mean difference − 6.7, p = 0.009; a medium effect size of 0.72). They also had significantly higher scores for 11 of the 32 indicators of good care in the areas of communication, delirium, behaviour, continence, pain and use of antipsychotic agents.

Interpretation:

Multidisciplinary integrated care resulted in improved quality of care for elderly people in residential care facilities compared with usual care.

Trial registration:

www.controlled-trials.com trial register no. ISRCTN11076857.The quality of care provided in residential care facilities is under pressure worldwide.¹ Facilities are frequently understaffed, and the complexity of care needed by residents increases while expertise of staff does not necessarily keep pace.^2,3 Although most care organizations want to innovate and improve quality of care, many lack expertise or financial resources needed to do so.^4,5 Family physicians are responsible for medical care in residential care facilities in the Netherlands. However, they do not regard themselves as suited for systematic management of chronic diseases and disabilities associated with frail health.⁶About 10% of elderly people aged 75 or older in the Netherlands live in residential care facilities.^7,8 These facilities were established to offer sheltered living for elderly people who are disabled but still relatively healthy. Because of the growing elderly population, the characteristics of elderly people living in residential care facilities have become more comparable to those of people in nursing homes, who need complex care. Residential care facilities in the Netherlands are comparable to residential care facilities in Canada, are publicly funded and are subject to government inspection and approval. Over 70% of the residents need professional care, such as assistance with activities of daily living, nursing care (e.g., medication, wound care) and housekeeping. They have multiple chronic diseases and associated disabilities.^9–12Effective interventions for chronic illnesses generally rely on a multidisciplinary team approach. The elements of this approach include structured geriatric assessment, protocol-based regulation of medications, support for self-reliance and intensive follow-up. The closely related disease management model comprises coordination of care, steering of the care process and patient empowerment.¹³ This model is strongly recommended by Bodenheimer and colleagues to improve the health and quality of life of chronically ill patients.¹⁴ However, no studies have as yet been undertaken to evaluate the effects of disease management on functional health and quality of care for elderly people in residential care facilities who have physical or cognitive disabilities.We developed an approach to multidisciplinary integrated care inspired by the disease management model. The objective of our study was to determine the effects of multidisciplinary integrated care on quality of care and quality of life for elderly people in residential care facilities.     

Oral health care in long‐term care facilities for elderly people in southern Brazil: a conceptual framework

doi:10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00280.x
Oral health care in long‐term care facilities for elderly people in southern Brazil: a conceptual framework Objective: To present a theoretical model for understanding oral health care for the elderly in the context of long‐term care institutions (LTCI). Methods: Open‐ended individual interviews were conducted with the elderly residing in LTCI, their carers, nursing technicians and nurses, directors of care, dental surgeons and managers of public health services. A grounded theory methodological approach was adopted for data collection and analysis. Results: The emerging core category revealed a basic social process: ‘Promoting oral health care for the elderly based on the context of LTCI’. This process was composed of two contradicting yet correlated aspects: the oral health care does not minimise the poor oral epidemiological condition, and at the same time, there was a continued improvement in the oral care expressed by better care practices. These aspects were related to the: attribution of meaning to oral health, social determination of oral health, the ageing process, interactions established in the oral health care practices, oral health care management in LTCI, inclusion of oral health care into the political–organisational dimension and possibility of conjecturing better oral health care practices. Conclusion: The core concept of ‘Promotion of oral health care for elderly people based on the context of LTCI’ is capable of explaining the variations in the structure and process of LTCI, as well as in helping to understand the meaning of the oral health care practices for the institutionalised elderly.     

Homes and housing for elderly people.

Most elderly people in Britain live independently in their own homes. Moving to alternative accommodation may be necessary for some people but requires careful consideration. A multidisciplinary assessment should be performed when a person plans to move into residential care; this should include the input of a doctor trained in geriatric medicine. A range of housing options is open to elderly people and these options are discussed here.     

Oral health care for frail elderly people: actual state and opinions of dentists towards a well-organised community approach

Objective: This study was undertaken to provide an analysis of the actual oral heath care for frail elderly people living in different settings and to explore opinions of dentists towards new concepts in developing a community approach. Method: Data were collected from a sample of 101 dentists (15%) in the county of Antwerp using a self‐administered 30‐item questionnaire including questions about age, gender, education, organisational aspects of dental surgery, questions concerning dentists’ own contribution to oral healthcare services for frail elderly people and statements concerning opinions and attitude toward the organisation of oral health care for frail elderly people. At the same time, qualitative data were collected from focus group sessions with all participating dentists. Non‐parametric analysis was used to explore possible relationships between opinion and possible explanatory variables. Results: Half of the dentists offered dental services to residential or nursing homes (mean number of treatments a year: 5.4) and at home (mean number of treatments a year: 2.4). Prosthetic treatments such as relieving denture pressure points, repairing, rebasing and making new dentures were carried out in 77.4% and 76.7% of the cases in residential or nursing homes and at home respectively. Extractions were carried out in 16% and 18.6% of the cases in both living situations respectively. The main reasons for dentists refusing domiciliary oral health care were the absence of dental equipment (63%), lack of time (19%), with 11% convincing the patients to be treated in their dental surgery. Analysis showed different opinions of dentists depending on age, gender and university of education; however, statistically significant differences were only found by age. Conclusion: The older the dentist, the greater the tendency to refuse domiciliary oral healthcare services. The younger dentists were reluctant to cooperate in the provision of oral health care in a structured community approach.     

Health care trends for older people.

Research is showing us a radically different view of aging from the one seen by earlier generations. Attitudes, which were based on the myth that physical and mental decline are inevitable with age, are beginning to change as a result of new scientific information. What we are learning is that aging involves both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The universal phenomena that occur in all of us as we advance in age are intrinsic characteristics of aging, while extrinsic factors are those characteristics that can be prevented or modified, such as lifestyle choices, environmental exposure, and disease.