A single mutation in the active site swaps the substrate specificity of N-acetyl-L-ornithine transcarbamylase and N-succinyl-L-ornithine transcarbamylase

Transcarbamylases catalyze the transfer of the carbamyl group from carbamyl phosphate (CP) to an amino group of a second substrate such as aspartate, ornithine, or putrescine. Previously, structural determination of a transcarbamylase from Xanthomonas campestris led to the discovery of a novel N-acetylornithine transcarbamylase (AOTCase) that catalyzes the carbamylation of N-acetylornithine. Recently, a novel N-succinylornithine transcarbamylase (SOTCase) from Bacteroides fragilis was identified. Structural comparisons of AOTCase from X. campestris and SOTCase from B. fragilis revealed that residue Glu92 (X. campestris numbering) plays a critical role in distinguishing AOTCase from SOTCase. Enzymatic assays of E92P, E92S, E92V, and E92A mutants of AOTCase demonstrate that each of these mutations converts the AOTCase to an SOTCase. Similarly, the P90E mutation in B. fragilis SOTCase (equivalent to E92 in X. campestris AOTCase) converts the SOTCase to AOTCase. Hence, a single amino acid substitution is sufficient to swap the substrate specificities of AOTCase and SOTCase. X-ray crystal structures of these mutants in complexes with CP and N-acetyl-L-norvaline (an analog of N-acetyl-L-ornithine) or N-succinyl-L-norvaline (an analog of N-succinyl-L-ornithine) substantiate this conversion. In addition to Glu92 (X. campestris numbering), other residues such as Asn185 and Lys30 in AOTCase, which are involved in binding substrates through bridging water molecules, help to define the substrate specificity of AOTCase. These results provide the correct annotation (AOTCase or SOTCase) for a set of the transcarbamylase-like proteins that have been erroneously annotated as ornithine transcarbamylase (OTCase, EC 2.1.3.3).     

Structure and catalytic mechanism of a novel N-succinyl-L-ornithine transcarbamylase in arginine biosynthesis of Bacteroides fragilis

A Bacteroides fragilis gene (argF'(bf)), the disruption of which renders the bacterium auxotrophic for arginine, was expressed and its recombinant protein purified and studied. The novel protein catalyzes the carbamylation of N-succinyl-L-ornithine but not L-ornithine or N-acetyl-L-ornithine, forming N-succinyl-L-citrulline. Crystal structures of this novel transcarbamylase complexed with carbamyl phosphate and N-succinyl-L-norvaline, as well as sulfate and N-succinyl-L-norvaline have been determined and refined to 2.9 and 2.8 A resolution, respectively. They provide structural evidence that this protein is a novel N-succinyl-L-ornithine transcarbamylase. The data provided herein suggest that B. fragilis uses N-succinyl-L-ornithine rather than N-acetyl-L-ornithine for de novo arginine biosynthesis and therefore that this pathway in Bacteroides is different from the canonical arginine biosynthetic pathway of most organisms. Comparison of the structures of the new protein with those recently reported for N-acetyl-L-ornithine transcarbamylase indicates that amino acid residue 90 (B. fragilis numbering) plays an important role in conferring substrate specificity for N-succinyl-L-ornithine versus N-acetyl-L-ornithine. Movement of the 120 loop upon substrate binding occurs in N-succinyl-L-ornithine transcarbamylase, while movement of the 80 loop and significant domain closure take place as in other transcarbamylases. These findings provide new information on the putative role of succinylated intermediates in arginine biosynthesis and on the evolution of transcarbamylases.     

Structural insights into substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK

How substrate affinity is modulated by nucleotide binding remains a fundamental, unanswered question in the study of 70 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp70) molecular chaperones. We find here that the Escherichia coli Hsp70, DnaK, lacking the entire alpha-helical domain, DnaK(1-507), retains the ability to support lambda phage replication in vivo and to pass information from the nucleotide binding domain to the substrate binding domain, and vice versa, in vitro. We determined the NMR solution structure of the corresponding substrate binding domain, DnaK(393-507), without substrate, and assessed the impact of substrate binding. Without bound substrate, loop L3,4 and strand beta3 are in significantly different conformations than observed in previous structures of the bound DnaK substrate binding domain, leading to occlusion of the substrate binding site. Upon substrate binding, the beta-domain shifts towards the structure seen in earlier X-ray and NMR structures. Taken together, our results suggest that conformational changes in the beta-domain itself contribute to the mechanism by which nucleotide binding modulates substrate binding affinity.     

Kinetic analysis of the L-ornithine transcarbamoylase from Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. phaseolicola that is resistant to the transition state analogue (R)-N delta-(N'-sulfodiaminophosphinyl)-L-ornithine

(R)-N(delta)-(N'-Sulfodiaminophosphinyl)-L-ornithine (PSorn) is the active component of a phytotoxin, called phaseolotoxin, produced by Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. phaseolicola. PSorn acts as a potent transition state (TS) inhibitor of ornithine transcarbamoylase (OTCase, E.C. 2.1.3.3) that binds to the OTCase from Escherichia coli (ARGI) with a dissociation constant of 1.6 pM. While inhibition of OTCase can lead to arginine auxotrophy, P. savastanoi pv. phaseolicola is able to synthesize toxin while growing on minimal medium. This is achieved by the expression during toxin production of a second gene encoding OTCase activity that is not inhibited by PSorn (ROTCase). ROTCase is orthologous to other OTCases, but it has substitutions to key conserved amino acids, particularly to those around the carbamoyl phosphate (CP) binding site and in the ornithine binding "SMG" loop. This suggests that the topology of the CP binding site and the closure of the SMG loop may be different in ROTCase. Steady-state kinetics indicate that ROTCase has an ordered mechanism, and the (13)C kinetic isotope effect (IE) in CP indicates that it is the first substrate to bind. However, unlike other OTCases, there is a random element to the mechanism since the second substrate ornithine (Orn) was unable to completely suppress the IE to unity. The most striking difference with ROTCase is the reduction of k(cat) to between 1% and 2% of other OTCases. This is consistent with the large IE that ROTCase exhibits (3.4%) at near-zero Orn. These results suggest that the chemistry of the reaction is rate limiting for ROTCase. ROTCase has a substrate and inhibitor profile similar to that of other OTCases. The CP binding affinity of ROTCase is diminished when compared with that observed from ARGI, and inhibitors that compete with the CP binding site have K(i) values at least 10-fold higher for ROTCase than for ARGI. Arsenate did not inhibit ROTCase, and bisubstrate and dead-end inhibitors are less effective inhibitors of ROTCase than ARGI. These data suggest that PSorn is unable to bind tightly to either the apo or activated forms of ROTCase at the expense of CP binding and reduced k(cat).     

Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospay ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies

Advances in understanding how GroEL binds to non-native proteins are reported. Conformational flexibility in the GroEL apical domain, which could account for the variety of substrates that GroEL binds, is illustrated by comparison of several independent crystallographic structures of apical domain constructs that show conformational plasticity in helices H and I. Additionally, ESI-MS indicates that apical domain constructs have co-populated conformations at neutral pH. To assess the ability of different apical domain conformers to bind co-chaperone and substrate, model peptides corresponding to the mobile loop of GroES and to helix D from rhodanese were studied. Analysis of apical domain-peptide complexes by ESI-MS indicates that only the folded or partially folded apical domain conformations form complexes that survive gas phase conditions. Fluorescence binding studies show that the apical domain can fully bind both peptides independently. No competition for binding was observed, suggesting the peptides have distinct apical domain-binding sites. Blocking the GroES-apical domain-binding site in GroEL rendered the chaperonin inactive in binding GroES and in assisting the folding of denatured rhodanese, but still capable of binding non-native proteins, supporting the conclusion that GroES and substrate proteins have, at least partially, distinct binding sites even in the intact GroEL tetradecamer.     

Use of L-asparagine and N-phosphonacetyl-L-asparagine to investigate the linkage of catalysis and homotropic cooperativity in E. coli aspartate transcarbomoylase

The mechanism of domain closure and the allosteric transition of Escherichia coli aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase) are investigated using L-Asn, in the presence of carbamoyl phosphate (CP), and N-phosphonacetyl-L-asparagine (PASN). ATCase was found to catalyze the carbamoylation of L-Asn with a K(m) of 122 mM and a maximal velocity 10-fold lower than observed with the natural substrate, L-Asp. As opposed to L-Asp, no cooperativity was observed with respect to L-Asn. Time-resolved small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and fluorescence experiments revealed that the combination of CP and L-Asn did not convert the enzyme from the T to the R state. PASN was found to be a potent inhibitor of ATCase exhibiting a K(D) of 8.8 microM. SAXS experiments showed that PASN was able to convert the entire population of molecules to the R state. Analysis of the crystal structure of the enzyme in the presence of PASN revealed that the binding of PASN was similar to that of the R-state complex of ATCase with N-phosphonaceyl-L-aspartate, another potent inhibitor of the enzyme. The linking of CP and L-Asn into one molecule, PASN, correctly orients the asparagine moiety in the active site to induce domain closure and the allosteric transition. This entropic effect allows for the high affinity binding of PASN. However, the binding of L-Asn, in the presence of a saturating concentration of CP, does not induce the closure of the two domains of the catalytic chain, nor does the enzyme undergo the transition to the high-activity high- affinity R structure. These results imply that Arg229, which interacts with the beta-carboxylate of L-Asp, plays a critical role in the orientation of L-Asp in the active site and demonstrates the requirement of the beta-carboxylate of L-Asp in the mechanism of domain closure and the allosteric transition in E. coli ATCase.     

Structural mechanism of allosteric substrate specificity regulation in a ribonucleotide reductase

Ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs) catalyze the reduction of ribonucleotides into deoxyribonucleotides, which constitute the precursor pools used for DNA synthesis and repair. Imbalances in these pools increase mutational rates and are detrimental to the cell. Balanced precursor pools are maintained primarily through the regulation of the RNR substrate specificity. Here, the molecular mechanism of the allosteric substrate specificity regulation is revealed through the structures of a dimeric coenzyme B12-dependent RNR from Thermotoga maritima, both in complexes with four effector-substrate nucleotide pairs and in three complexes with only effector. The mechanism is based on the flexibility of loop 2, a key structural element, which forms a bridge between the specificity effector and substrate nucleotides. Substrate specificity is achieved as different effectors and their cognate substrates stabilize specific discrete loop 2 conformations. The mechanism of substrate specificity regulation is probably general for most class I and class II RNRs.     

The substrate translocation channel of the proteasome

The core particle (CP) of the yeast proteasome is composed of four heptameric rings of subunits arranged in a hollow, barrel-like structure. We have found that the CP is autoinhibited by the N-terminal tails of the outer (alpha) ring subunits. Crystallographic analysis showed that deletion of the tail of the alpha3 subunit opens a channel into the proteolytically active interior chamber of the CP, thus derepressing peptide hydrolysis. In the latent state of the particle, the tails prevent substrate entry by imposing topological closure on the CP. Inhibition by the alpha subunit tails is relieved upon binding of the regulatory particle to the CP to form the proteasome holoenzyme. Opening of the CP channel by assembly of the holoenzyme is regulated by the ATPase domain of Rpt2, one of 17 subunits in the RP. Thus, open-channel mutations in CP subunits suppress the closed-channel phenotype of an rpt2 mutant. These results identify a specific mechanism for allosteric regulation of the CP by the RP.     

Uncoupling Kapbeta2 substrate dissociation and ran binding

Karyopherinbeta2 (Kapbeta2) imports a variety of mRNA binding proteins into the nucleus. Release of import substrates in the nucleus involves formation of a high-affinity Kapbeta2-RanGTP complex and concomitant dissociation of import substrates. The crystal structure of the Kapbeta2-RanGppNHp complex shows that Ran binds in the Kapbeta2 N-terminal arch and substrate most likely binds its C-terminal arch. The structure suggested a mechanism for Ran-mediated substrate dissociation where a long internal acidic loop in Kapbeta2 transmits structural information between the GTPase and substrate sites, leading to displacement of substrate by the loop when Ran is bound. To study the molecular mechanism of substrate dissociation, we have cleaved the acidic loop of Kapbeta2 proteolytically (cl-Kapbeta2) and also constructed a mutant of Kapbeta2 with a truncated loop (TL-Kapbeta2). Both modified Kapbeta2s are unable to undergo Ran-mediated substrate dissociation. We have also mapped the boundaries of the Kapbeta2 binding site of substrate mRNA binding protein A1 using a widely applicable method employing NMR spectroscopy. This has allowed design of reagents to quantitate the affinities of the Kapbeta2 proteins for Ran and substrate. cl-Kapbeta2, TL-Kapbeta2, and native Kapbeta2 have comparable affinities for both RanGppNHp and import substrates, indicating that perturbation of the loop has not altered the strength of binary Kapbeta2-Ran or Kapbeta2-substrate interactions. The TL-Kapbeta2 mutant also binds RanGppNHp and substrate simultaneously to form a ternary complex, indicating that in addition to the loss of coupling between Ran binding and substrate dissociation, the two ligand sites on Kapbeta2 are spatially distinct. The uncoupling of Ran binding and substrate dissociation in the TL-Kapbeta2 mutant is further evident in significant loss of Ran-mediated nuclear uptake of fluorescent substrate in digitonin-permeabilized HeLa cells. These results support our previously proposed GTPase-mediated Kapbeta2-substrate dissociation mechanism where the acidic loop of Kapbeta2 physically couples distinct Ran and substrate binding sites.     

Structure of Toxoplasma gondii LDH1: active-site differences from human lactate dehydrogenases and the structural basis for efficient APAD+ use

While within a human host the opportunistic pathogen Toxoplasma gondii relies heavily on glycolysis for its energy needs. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), the terminal enzyme in anaerobic glycolysis necessary for NAD(+) regeneration, therefore represents an attractive therapeutic target. The tachyzoite stage lactate dehydrogenase (LDH1) from the parasite T. gondii has been crystallized in apo form and in ternary complexes containing NAD(+) or the NAD(+)-analogue 3-acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide (APAD(+)) and sulfate or the inhibitor oxalate. Comparison of the apo and ternary models shows an active-site loop that becomes ordered upon substrate binding. This active-site loop is five residues longer than in most LDHs and necessarily adopts a different conformation. While loop isomerization is fully rate-limiting in prototypical LDHs, kinetic data suggest that LDH1's rate is limited by chemical steps. The importance of charge neutralization in ligand binding is supported by the complexes that have been crystallized as well as fluorescence quenching experiments performed with ligands at low and high pH. A methionine that replaces a serine residue and displaces an ordered water molecule often seen in LDH structures provides a structural explanation for reduced substrate inhibition. Superimposition of LDH1 with human muscle- and heart-specific LDH isoforms reveals differences in residues that line the active site that increase LDH1's hydrophobicity. These differences will aid in designing inhibitors specific for LDH1 that may be useful in treating toxoplasmic encephalitis and other complications that arise in immune-compromised individuals.     

Determinants of substrate specificity in RNA-dependent nucleotidyl transferases

Poly(A) polymerases were identified almost 50 years ago as enzymes that add multiple AMP residues to the 3' ends of primer RNAs without use of a template from ATP as cosubstrate and with release of pyrophosphate. Based on sequence homology of a signature motif in the catalytic domain, poly(A) polymerases were later found to belong to a superfamily of nucleotidyl transferases acting on a very diverse array of substrates. Enzymes belonging to the superfamily can add from single nucleotides of AMP, CMP or UMP to RNA, antibiotics and proteins but also homopolymers of many hundred residues to the 3' ends of RNA molecules. The recently reported structures of several nucleotidyl transferases facilitate the study of the catalytic mechanisms of these very diverse enzymes. Numerous structures of CCA-adding enzymes have now revealed all steps in the formation of a CCA tail at the 3' end of tRNAs. In addition, structures of poly(A) polymerases and uridylyl transferases are now available as binary and ternary complexes with incoming nucleotide and RNA primer. Some of these proteins undergo significant conformational changes after substrate binding. This is proposed to be an indication for an induced fit mechanism that drives substrate selection and leads to catalysis. Insights from recent structures of ternary complexes indicate an important role for the primer molecule in selecting the incoming nucleotide.     

Crystal structure of a mono- and diacylglycerol lipase from Malassezia globosa reveals a novel lid conformation and insights into the substrate specificity

Most lipases contain a lid domain to shield the hydrophobic binding site from the water environment. The lid, mostly in helical form, can undergo a conformational change to expose the active cleft during the interfacial activation. Here we report the crystal structures of Malassezia globosa LIP1 (SMG1) at 1.45 and 2.60 ? resolution in two crystal forms. The structures present SMG1 in its closed form, with a novel lid in loop conformation. SMG1 is one of the few members in the fungal lipase family that has been found to be strictly specific for mono- and diacylglycerol. To date, the mechanism for this substrate specificity remains largely unknown. To investigate the substrate binding properties, we built a model of SMG1 in open conformation. Based on this model, we found that the two bulky hydrophobic residues adjacent to the catalytic site and the N-terminal hinge region of the lid both may act as steric hindrances for triacylglycerols binding. These unique structural features of SMG1 will provide a better understanding on the substrate specificity of mono- and diacylglycerol lipases and a platform for further functional study of this enzyme.     

A conserved surface loop in type I dehydroquinate dehydratases positions an active site arginine and functions in substrate binding

Dehydroquinate dehydratase (DHQD) catalyzes the third step in the biosynthetic shikimate pathway. We present three crystal structures of the Salmonella enterica type I DHQD that address the functionality of a surface loop that is observed to close over the active site following substrate binding. Two wild-type structures with differing loop conformations and kinetic and structural studies of a mutant provide evidence of both direct and indirect mechanisms of involvement of the loop in substrate binding. In addition to allowing amino acid side chains to establish a direct interaction with the substrate, closure of the loop necessitates a conformational change of a key active site arginine, which in turn positions the substrate productively. The absence of DHQD in humans and its essentiality in many pathogenic bacteria make the enzyme a target for the development of nontoxic antimicrobials. The structures and ligand binding insights presented here may inform the design of novel type I DHQD inhibiting molecules.     

Multiple extracellular loops contribute to substrate binding and transport by the Escherichia coli cobalamin transporter BtuB

The Escherichia coli outer membrane TonB-dependent transporters for iron complexes and cobalamins recognize their multiple and diverse substrates with high specificity and affinity. The X-ray crystallographic structures of several transporters show that the substrate-binding surfaces are comprised of residues from the internal globular domain and multiple extracellular loops. The extracellular loops on the N-terminal half of the transmembrane beta-barrel of the cobalamin transporter BtuB participate in binding of the cofactor calcium atoms and undergo substantial conformation changes upon substrate binding. The functional relevance of the five C-terminal loops was examined by examining the effects of short in-frame deletions. Each loop contributed in different ways to the binding of BtuB substrates. Deletions in loops 7, 8, 9, and 11 strongly decreased cobalamin binding and transport, whereas deletions in loops 8, 9, and 10 affected binding and entry of phage BF23. None of the loops were essential for the action of colicin E1 or E3, which is consistent with the crystallographic observation that the colicin E3 receptor-binding domain can contact almost all of the loops. A deletion in loop 9 or 11 eliminated the ability of cobalamin to inhibit the action of colicin E1. These phenotypes show that there are multiple independent binding elements and point out similarities and differences in binding properties among the TonB-dependent transporters.     

Structural basis for substrate recognition and dissociation by human transportin 1

Transportin 1 (Trn1) is a transport receptor that transports substrates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes by recognizing nuclear localization signals (NLSs). Here we describe four crystal structures of human Trn1 in a substrate-free form as well as in the complex with three NLSs (hnRNP D, JKTBP, and TAP, respectively). Our data have revealed that (1) Trn1 has two sites for binding NLSs, one with high affinity (site A) and one with low affinity (site B), and NLS interaction at site B controls overall binding affinity for Trn1; (2) Trn1 recognizes the NLSs at site A followed by conformational change at site B to interact with the NLSs; and (3) a long flexible loop, characteristic of Trn1, interacts with site B, thereby displacing transport substrate in the nucleus. These studies provide deep understanding of substrate recognition and dissociation by Trn1 in import pathways.     

Structural basis for the catalytic mechanism of aspartate ammonia lyase

Aspartate ammonia lyases (or aspartases) catalyze the reversible deamination of L-aspartate into fumarate and ammonia. The lack of crystal structures of complexes with substrate, product, or substrate analogues so far precluded determination of their precise mechanism of catalysis. Here, we report crystal structures of AspB, the aspartase from Bacillus sp. YM55-1, in an unliganded state and in complex with L-aspartate at 2.4 and 2.6 ? resolution, respectively. AspB forces the bound substrate to adopt a high-energy, enediolate-like conformation that is stabilized, in part, by an extensive network of hydrogen bonds between residues Thr101, Ser140, Thr141, and Ser319 and the substrate's β-carboxylate group. Furthermore, substrate binding induces a large conformational change in the SS loop (residues G(317)SSIMPGKVN(326)) from an open conformation to one that closes over the active site. In the closed conformation, the strictly conserved SS loop residue Ser318 is at a suitable position to act as a catalytic base, abstracting the Cβ proton of the substrate in the first step of the reaction mechanism. The catalytic importance of Ser318 was confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. Site-directed mutagenesis of SS loop residues, combined with structural and kinetic analysis of a stable proteolytic AspB fragment, further suggests an important role for the small C-terminal domain of AspB in controlling the conformation of the SS loop and, hence, in regulating catalytic activity. Our results provide evidence supporting the notion that members of the aspartase/fumarase superfamily use a common catalytic mechanism involving general base-catalyzed formation of a stabilized enediolate intermediate.     

The loops facing the active site of prolyl oligopeptidase are crucial components in substrate gating and specificity

Prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) has emerged as a drug target for neurological diseases. A flexible loop structure comprising loop A (res. 189–209) and loop B (res. 577–608) at the domain interface is implicated in substrate entry to the active site. Here we determined kinetic and structural properties of POP with mutations in loop A, loop B, and in two additional flexible loops (the catalytic His loop, propeller Asp/Glu loop). POP lacking loop A proved to be an inefficient enzyme, as did POP with a mutation in loop B (T590C). Both variants displayed an altered substrate preference profile, with reduced ligand binding capacity. Conversely, the T202C mutation increased the flexibility of loop A, enhancing the catalytic efficiency beyond that of the native enzyme. The T590C mutation in loop B increased the preference for shorter peptides, indicating a role in substrate gating. Loop A and the His loop are disordered in the H680A mutant crystal structure, as seen in previous bacterial POP structures, implying coordinated structural dynamics of these loops. Unlike native POP, variants with a malfunctioning loop A were not inhibited by a 17-mer peptide that may bind non-productively to an exosite involving loop A. Biophysical studies suggest a predominantly closed resting state for POP with higher flexibility at the physiological temperature. The flexible loop A, loop B and His loop system at the active site is the main regulator of substrate gating and specificity and represents a new inhibitor target.     

What can the structures of enzyme-inhibitor complexes tell us about the structures of enzyme substrate complexes?

Proteinases perform many beneficial functions that are essential to life, but they are also dangerous and must be controlled. Here we focus on one of the control mechanisms: the ubiquitous presence of protein proteinase inhibitors. We deal only with a subset of these: the standard mechanism, canonical protein inhibitors of serine proteinases. Each of the inhibitory domains of such inhibitors has one reactive site peptide bond, which serves all the cognate enzymes as a substrate. The reactive site peptide bond is in a combining loop which has an identical conformation in all inhibitors and in all enzyme-inhibitor complexes. There are at least 18 families of such inhibitors. They all share the conformation of the combining loops but each has its own global three-dimensional structure. Many three-dimensional structures of enzyme-inhibitor complexes were determined. They are frequently used to predict the conformation of substrates in very short-lived enzyme-substrate transition state complexes. Turkey ovomucoid third domain and eglin c have a Leu residue at P(1). In complexes with chymotrypsin, these P(1) Leu residues assume the same conformation. The relative free energies of binding of P(1) Leu (relative to either P(1) Gly or P(1) Ala) are within experimental error, the same for complexes of turkey ovomucoid third domain, eglin c, P(1) Leu variant of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and of a substrate with chymotrypsin. Therefore, the P(1) Leu conformation in transition state complexes is predictable. In contrast, the conformation of P(1) Lys(+) is strikingly different in the complexes of Lys(18) turkey ovomucoid third domain and of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor with chymotrypsin. The relative free energies of binding are also quite different. Yet, the relative free energies of binding are nearly identical for Lys(+) in turkey ovomucoid third domain and in a substrate, thus allowing us to know the structure of the latter. Similar reasoning is applied to a few other systems.     

A duck delta1 crystallin double loop mutant provides insight into residues important for argininosuccinate lyase activity

Delta-crystallin is directly related to argininosuccinate lyase (ASL), and catalyzes the reversible hydrolysis of argininosuccinate to arginine and fumarate. Two delta-crystallin isoforms exist in duck lenses, delta1 and delta2, which are 94% identical in amino acid sequence. Although the sequences of duck delta2-crystallin (ddeltac2) and duck delta1-crystallin (ddeltac1) are 69 and 71% identical to that of human ASL, respectively, only ddeltac2 has maintained ASL activity. Domain exchange experiments and comparisons of various delta-crystallin structures have suggested that the amino acid substitutions in the 20's (residues 22-31) and 70's (residues 74-89) loops of ddeltac1 are responsible for the loss of enzyme activity in this isoform. To test this hypothesis, a double loop mutant (DLM) of ddeltac1 was constructed in which all the residues that differ between the two isoforms in the 20's and 70's loops were mutated to those of ddeltac2. Contrary to expectations, kinetic analysis of the DLM found that it was enzymatically inactive. Furthermore, binding of argininosuccinate by the DLM, as well as the ddeltac1, could not be detected by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). To examine the conformation of the 20's and 70's loops in the DLM, and to understand why the DLM is unable to bind the substrate, its structure was determined to 2.5 A resolution. Comparison of this structure with both wild-type ddeltac1 and ddeltac2 structures reveals that the conformations of the 20's and 70's loops in the DLM mutant are very similar to those of ddeltac2. This suggests that the five amino acid substitutions in domain 1 which lie outside of the two loop regions and which are different in the DLM, and ddeltac2, must be important enzymatically. The structure of the DLM in complex with sulfate was also determined to 2.2 A resolution. This structure demonstrates that the conformational changes of the 280's loop and domain 3, previously observed in ddeltac1, also occur in the DLM upon sulfate binding, reinforcing the hypothesis that these events may occur in the active ddeltac2 protein during catalysis.     

Dynamics of the HD regulatory subdomain of PARP-1; substrate access and allostery in PARP activation and inhibition

PARP-1 is a key early responder to DNA damage in eukaryotic cells. An allosteric mechanism links initial sensing of DNA single-strand breaks by PARP-1’s F1 and F2 domains via a process of further domain assembly to activation of the catalytic domain (CAT); synthesis and attachment of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains to protein sidechains then signals for assembly of DNA repair components. A key component in transmission of the allosteric signal is the HD subdomain of CAT, which alone bridges between the assembled DNA-binding domains and the active site in the ART subdomain of CAT. Here we present a study of isolated CAT domain from human PARP-1, using NMR-based dynamics experiments to analyse WT apo-protein as well as a set of inhibitor complexes (with veliparib, olaparib, talazoparib and EB-47) and point mutants (L713F, L765A and L765F), together with new crystal structures of the free CAT domain and inhibitor complexes. Variations in both dynamics and structures amongst these species point to a model for full-length PARP-1 activation where first DNA binding and then substrate interaction successively destabilise the folded structure of the HD subdomain to the point where its steric blockade of the active site is released and PAR synthesis can proceed.