A Genetic Engineering Solution to the ��Arginine Conversion Problem�� in Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC)

Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) provides a straightforward tool for quantitation in proteomics. However, one problem associated with SILAC is the in vivo conversion of labeled arginine to other amino acids, typically proline. We found that arginine conversion in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe occurred at extremely high levels, such that labeling cells with heavy arginine led to undesired incorporation of label into essentially all of the proline pool as well as a substantial portion of glutamate, glutamine, and lysine pools. We found that this can be prevented by deleting genes involved in arginine catabolism using methods that are highly robust yet simple to implement. Deletion of both fission yeast arginase genes or of the single ornithine transaminase gene, together with a small modification to growth medium that improves arginine uptake in mutant strains, was sufficient to abolish essentially all arginine conversion. We demonstrated the usefulness of our approach in a large scale quantitative analysis of proteins before and after cell division; both up- and down-regulated proteins, including a novel protein involved in septation, were successfully identified. This strategy for addressing the “arginine conversion problem” may be more broadly applicable to organisms amenable to genetic manipulation.Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)¹ (1) is one of the key methods for large scale quantitative proteomics (2, 3). In SILAC experiments, proteins are metabolically labeled by culturing cells in media containing either normal (“light”) or heavy isotope-labeled amino acids, typically lysine and arginine. Peptides derived from the light and heavy cells are thus distinguishable by mass spectrometry and can be mixed for accurate quantitation. SILAC is also possible at the whole-organism level (4).An inherent problem in SILAC is the metabolic conversion of labeled arginine to other amino acids, as this complicates quantitative analysis of peptides containing these amino acids. Arginine conversion to proline is well described in mammalian cells, although the extent of conversion varies among cell types (5). When conversion is observed, typically 10–25% of the total proline pool is found to contain label (6–11). Arginine conversion has also been reported in SILAC experiments with budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3, 12, 13).Because more than 50% of tryptic peptides in large data sets contain proline (7), it is not practical simply to disregard proline-containing peptides during quantitation. Several methods have been proposed to either reduce arginine conversion or correct for its effects on quantitation. In some cell types, arginine conversion can be prevented by lowering the concentration of exogenous arginine (6, 14–16) or by adding exogenous proline (9). However, these methods can involve significant changes to growth media and may need to be tested for each experimental condition used. Given the importance of arginine in many metabolic pathways, careful empirical titration of exogenous arginine concentration is required to minimize negative effects on cell growth (14). In addition, low arginine medium can lead to incomplete arginine labeling, although the reasons for this are not entirely clear (7). An alternative strategy is to omit labeled arginine altogether (3, 13, 17), but this reduces the number of quantifiable peptides. Correction methods include using two different forms of labeled arginine (7) or computationally compensating for proline-containing peptides (11, 12, 18). Ultimately, none of these methods address the problem at its root, the utilization of arginine in cellular metabolism.To develop a differential proteomics work flow for the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we sought to adapt SILAC for use in this organism, a widely used model eukaryote with excellent classical and reverse genetics. Here we describe extremely high conversion of labeled arginine to other amino acids in fission yeast as well as a novel general solution to the problem that should be applicable to other organisms. As proof of principle, we quantitated changes in protein levels before and after cell division on a proteome-wide scale. We identified both up- and down-regulated proteins, including a novel protein involved in septation.     

Stable Isotope Labeling in Zebrafish Allows in Vivo Monitoring of Cardiac Morphogenesis

Quantitative proteomics is an important tool to study biological processes, but so far it has been challenging to apply to zebrafish. Here, we describe a large scale quantitative analysis of the zebrafish proteome using a combination of stable isotope labeling and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Proteins derived from the fully labeled fish were used as a standard to quantify changes during embryonic heart development. LC-MS-assisted analysis of the proteome of activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule zebrafish morphants revealed a down-regulation of components of the network required for cell adhesion and maintenance of cell shape as well as secondary changes due to arrest of cellular differentiation. Quantitative proteomics in zebrafish using the stable isotope-labeling technique provides an unprecedented resource to study developmental processes in zebrafish.Over the past years, mass spectrometry-based proteomics has been widely used to analyze complex biological samples (1). Although the latest generation of MS instrumentation allows proteome-wide analysis, protein quantitation is still a challenge (2, 3). Metabolic labeling using stable isotopes has been used for almost a century. Today, the most commonly used techniques for relative protein quantification are based on ¹⁵N labeling and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)¹ (4, 5). SILAC was initially developed for cell culture experiments, and recent approaches extended labeling to living organisms, including bacteria (6), yeast (7), flies (8), worms (9), and rodents (10, 11). In addition, several pulsed SILAC (also known as dynamic SILAC) experiments were performed to assess protein dynamics in cell culture and living animals (12–15).The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has proved to be an important model organism to study developmental processes. It also serves as a valuable tool to investigate basic pathogenic principles of human diseases such as cardiovascular disorders and tissue regeneration (16). So far, most researchers rely on immunohistochemistry and Western blots for semi-quantitative protein analysis, an approach that is hampered by the paucity of reliable antibodies in zebrafish. Proteomics approaches that depend on two-dimensional gel approaches (17–19) have not gained wide popularity because of issues with workload, reproducibility, and sensitivity (20, 21).Another approach for protein quantitation is the chemical modification of peptides, and so far several isobaric tagging methods, including ICAT (22), iTRAQ (23), ¹⁸O (24), and dimethyl labeling (25), have been proven to be successful methods.Recently, a quantitative phosphopeptide study based on dimethyl labeling in zebrafish showed the consequences of a morpholino-based kinase knockdown (26). However, each chemical modification bears the risk of nonspecific and incomplete labeling, which complicates mass spectrometric data interpretation.Alternatively, a metabolic labeling study with stable isotopes was recently performed on adult zebrafish by the administration of a mouse diet containing [¹³C₆]lysine (Lys-6) (27). Feeding adult zebrafish with the Lys-6-containing mouse chow leads to an incorporation rate of 40%, and SILAC labeling was used to investigate protein and tissue turnover.Here, we have developed a SILAC fish diet made in-house for the complete SILAC labeling of zebrafish. We established a Lys-6-containing diet as a universal fish food for larval and adult zebrafish. The method allows accurate quantitation of large numbers of proteins, and we proved our approach by the analysis of embryonic heart development. In addition, we investigated the consequences of the morpholino-based activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) knockdown during development and identified the lipid anchor protein Paralemmin as a down-regulated protein during heart development. Our approach yielded a huge resource of protein expression data for zebrafish development and provided the basis for more refined studies depending on accurate SILAC protein quantification.     

Proteomic Identification of Novel Secreted Antibacterial Toxins of the Serratia marcescens Type VI Secretion System

It has recently become apparent that the Type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a complex macromolecular machine used by many bacterial species to inject effector proteins into eukaryotic or bacterial cells, with significant implications for virulence and interbacterial competition. “Antibacterial” T6SSs, such as the one elaborated by the opportunistic human pathogen, Serratia marcescens, confer on the secreting bacterium the ability to rapidly and efficiently kill rival bacteria. Identification of secreted substrates of the T6SS is critical to understanding its role and ability to kill other cells, but only a limited number of effectors have been reported so far. Here we report the successful use of label-free quantitative mass spectrometry to identify at least eleven substrates of the S. marcescens T6SS, including four novel effector proteins which are distinct from other T6SS-secreted proteins reported to date. These new effectors were confirmed as antibacterial toxins and self-protecting immunity proteins able to neutralize their cognate toxins were identified. The global secretomic study also unexpectedly revealed that protein phosphorylation-based post-translational regulation of the S. marcescens T6SS differs from that of the paradigm, H1-T6SS of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Combined phosphoproteomic and genetic analyses demonstrated that conserved PpkA-dependent threonine phosphorylation of the T6SS structural component Fha is required for T6SS activation in S. marcescens and that the phosphatase PppA can reverse this modification. However, the signal and mechanism of PpkA activation is distinct from that observed previously and does not appear to require cell–cell contact. Hence this study has not only demonstrated that new and species-specific portfolios of antibacterial effectors are secreted by the T6SS, but also shown for the first time that PpkA-dependent post-translational regulation of the T6SS is tailored to fit the needs of different bacterial species.Gram-negative bacteria have evolved several specialized protein secretion systems to secrete a wide variety of substrate proteins into the extracellular milieu or to inject them into other, often eukaryotic, cells (1). Secreted proteins and their associated secretion systems are very important in bacterial virulence and interactions with other organisms (2). One of the most recent discoveries in this field is the Type VI secretion system (T6SS),¹ which occurs widely across bacterial species (3, 4) and can target proteins to both bacterial and eukaryotic cells (5). The significance of the T6SS is becoming increasingly apparent. It has been implicated in virulence, commensalism, and symbiosis with eukaryotes (5, 6). Additionally, in many bacteria, the T6SS is now implicated in antibacterial activity. T6SS-mediated antibacterial killing appears to be important for competition between bacterial species, for example within the resident microflora of a eukaryotic host (5, 7).Secretion by the T6SS relies on 13 conserved core components which are predicted to form a large machinery associated with the cell envelope, including membrane-bound and bacteriophage tail-like subassemblies (8, 9). The membrane bound subassembly consists of inner membrane proteins (TssLM) and an outer membrane lipoprotein (TssJ) and is anchored to the cell wall. The phage tail-like assembly consists of several proteins that show structural homology with T4 phage tail proteins or are organized in similar structures (10). Hcp (TssD) proteins form hexameric rings and are thought to stack into tube-like structures (11, 12). This Hcp tube is believed to be capped by a trimer of VgrG (TssI) proteins, which share structural homology with the needle of the T4 phage tail (10, 13). In addition, VipA (TssB) and VipB (TssC) form a large tubular structure highly reminiscent of the T4 phage tail sheath (14, 15). Such similarities have led to the idea that the T6SS resembles an inverted contractile bacteriophage infection machinery and injects substrates via an Hcp/VgrG needle into other cells. Recent models propose that the VipA/B sheath surrounds the Hcp/VgrG needle and contraction of the VipA/B tube pushes the Hcp/VgrG needle out of the cell (16–18). It has been postulated that this mechanism can be triggered by close contact with other neighboring cells (19–21).Assembly, localization, and remodelling of VipA/B tubules in vivo depend on the AAA+ ATPase ClpV (TssH), another essential core component of the T6SS (14, 16, 17). ClpV also interacts with the accessory component Fha (TagH) (22, 23), which is found in a subset of T6SSs (4). The Fha protein has an N-terminal domain with a forkhead associated motif, which is predicted to bind phospho-threonine peptides (24). In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Fha1 is phosphorylated by the Thr/Ser kinase PpkA (TagE) and dephosphorylated by the phosphatase PppA (TagG), and the phosphorylation state of Fha1 regulates the activity of the T6SS (22, 23). Phosphorylation of Fha in P. aeruginosa is also controlled by additional components, which act upstream of PpkA and form a regulatory cascade for T6SS activation (22, 25). Although homologs of PpkA and PppA have been identified in the T6SS gene clusters of certain other bacteria (3), the regulation of the T6SS by post-translational protein phosphorylation has not yet been experimentally investigated outside of Pseudomonas.To understand how the T6SS affects eukaryotic and bacterial cells, it is critical to identify substrate proteins secreted by the T6SS. The VgrG and Hcp proteins were the first identified T6SS substrates and appear to be generally secreted to the external milieu by all T6SSs (26). However, as mentioned above, Hcp and VgrG are core components of the T6SS machinery and therefore represent extracellular components of the secretion apparatus rather than genuine secreted effector proteins. Nonetheless, a limited number of VgrG homologs with extra functional effector domains at the C terminus have been identified or predicted, which account for some of the T6SS dependent effects seen against bacteria and eukaryotes. For example, the C-terminal domain of VgrG-1 from Vibrio cholerae shows actin crosslinking activity in eukaryotic cells (13, 27) and the C-terminal domain of V. cholerae VgrG-3 has bacterial cell wall hydrolase activity (28, 29).Recently, following much effort in the field, a small number of proteins secreted by the T6SS, but not structural components, have been experimentally identified. These proteins are regarded as true secreted substrates of the T6SS, with effector functions in target cells (29–35). For example, antibacterial T6SS-secreted effector proteins with peptidoglycan amidase (cell wall hydrolysis) function, the Type VI amidase effector (Tae) proteins, have been identified in Burkholderia thailandensis (32), P. aeruginosa (31), and Serratia marcescens (30). These Tae proteins play a role in T6SS-mediated antibacterial killing activity and genes encoding four families of Tae protein have been widely identified in other bacteria with T6SSs (32). T6SS-secreted effector proteins which are not peptidoglycan hydrolases have also been reported, including Tse2 secreted by P. aeruginosa, which acts in the bacterial cytoplasm (31), and the VasX and TseL proteins secreted by the V. cholerae T6SS, which are suggested to target membrane lipids (29, 34, 35). In the case of antibacterial T6SSs, the secreting bacterial cells are protected from their own T6SS effector proteins by specific immunity proteins (29–32, 35). However, given the large number of T6SSs in different bacterial species and their apparent ability to secrete multiple substrates, experimentally identified T6-secreted effector proteins still remain surprisingly scarce.Here we report the identification of multiple T6SS-secreted effector proteins in S. marcescens. S. marcescens is an opportunistic pathogen, for example causing ocular infections, nosocomial septicemia and pneumonia (36). Previously, we have identified a T6SS in S. marcescens Db10, which targets and efficiently kills other bacterial cells and plays a role in antibacterial competition (37). We have recently demonstrated that this T6SS secretes two antibacterial effectors, the Tae4 homologs Ssp1 and Ssp2, with cognate immunity proteins Rap1a and Rap2a (30).In this work, we report the analysis of the T6SS-dependent secretome of S. marcescens by label-free quantitation (LFQ) mass spectrometry and describe the identification and characterization of four novel T6SS-secreted effector proteins. These were confirmed as antibacterial toxins and specific immunity proteins were identified. Additionally, this global secretomic analysis, in combination with genetic and phosphoproteomic analyses, demonstrated that a post-translational phosphorylation system influences the ability of the S. marcescens T6SS to secrete effector proteins. Although this system uses homologs of the P. aeruginosa PpkA, PppA and Fha components, the circumstances and impact of Fha phosphorylation were shown to vary between organisms.     

Hypomaturation Enamel Defects in Klk4 Knockout/LacZ Knockin Mice

Kallikrein 4 (Klk4) is believed to play an essential role in enamel biomineralization, because defects in KLK4 cause hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. We used gene targeting to generate a knockin mouse that replaces the Klk4 gene sequence, starting at the translation initiation site, with a lacZ reporter gene. Correct targeting of the transgene was confirmed by Southern blot and PCR analyses. Histochemical X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside) staining demonstrated expression of β-galactosidase in maturation stage ameloblasts. No X-gal staining was observed in secretory stage ameloblasts or in odontoblasts. Retained enamel proteins were observed in the maturation stage enamel of the Klk4 null mouse, but not in the Klk4 heterozygous or wild-type mice. The enamel layer in the Klk4 null mouse was normal in thickness and contained decussating enamel rods but was rapidly abraded following weaning, despite the mice being maintained on soft chow. In function the enamel readily fractured within the initial rod and interrod enamel above the parallel enamel covering the dentino-enamel junction. Despite the lack of Klk4 and the retention of enamel proteins, significant levels of crystal maturation occurred (although delayed), and the enamel achieved a mineral density in some places greater than that detected in bone and dentin. An important finding was that individual enamel crystallites of erupted teeth failed to grow together, interlock, and function as a unit. Instead, individual crystallites seemed to spill out of the enamel when fractured. These results demonstrate that Klk4 is essential for the removal of enamel proteins and the proper maturation of enamel crystals.Dental enamel is composed of highly ordered, very long crystals of calcium hydroxyapatite (Ca₁₀(PO₄)₆(OH)₂). Mature enamel crystallites are about 70 nm wide and 30 nm thick, but are of unmeasurable length (1), probably extending all the way from the dentin layer to the surface of the tooth (2). Enamel crystallites are organized into bundles called rods, with about 10,000 parallel crystals in a rod (3). Each enamel rod is the product of a single ameloblast, the cell type that forms a continuous sheet over the developing enamel and orchestrates its formation. Dental enamel of erupted teeth is ∼95% mineral (by weight) (4), with most of the non-mineral component being water. Protein comprises <1% of its weight. Forming enamel, however, is over 30% protein (5). Much of the protein is reabsorbed by ameloblasts and degraded in lysosomes (6, 7), but extracellular proteases also play a role in matrix protein removal (8–10).Dental enamel formation is divided into secretory, transition, and maturation stages (11, 12). During the secretory stage, enamel crystals grow primarily in length. As the crystals extend, the enamel layer expands. Enamel crystallites lengthen along a mineralization front at the secretory surface of the ameloblast cell membrane. There, mineral deposits rapidly on the crystallite tips, and very slowly on their sides (3, 13, 14). By the end of the secretory stage the enamel crystals are full-length and the enamel layer as a whole is as thick as it will ever be, but it has only about 14% of the mineral as it will have when the tooth erupts (15). Following the secretory stage there is then a transition during which the ameloblasts greatly reduce their secretion of enamel proteins (16) and convert to maturation ameloblasts (17). During the maturation stage, mineral is deposited exclusively on the sides of pre-existing enamel crystallites (18), which grow in width and thickness until further growth is prevented by contact with adjacent crystals (19, 20). During early maturation the percentage protein by weight drops from 30 to 2% (5), and half of the total enamel mineral is deposited. The final 30–35% of mineral is deposited in the absence of significant protein and allows the crystals to grow firmly against one another and to mechanically interlock (15).The major secretory stage enamel proteins are amelogenin (21, 22), ameloblastin (23–25), and enamelin (26, 27). These proteins function specifically during enamel formation, and the disease phenotypes exhibited by mice lacking these genes are confined to the developing teeth and include enamel agenesis (28–30). These genes are often deleted or are reduced to pseudogenes in vertebrates such as birds or baleen whales that evolved alternatives to developing teeth (31, 32). Although the enamel extracellular matrix proteins are critical for growing enamel crystals, they are not part of the final enamel product. Prior to tooth eruption, enamel proteins are digested by proteases and reabsorbed by ameloblasts. Two extracellular matrix proteases are involved in the cleavage of enamel proteins: matrix metalloproteinase 20 (Mmp-20)² (33) and kallikrein 4 (Klk4) (34).Mmp-20 is secreted along with amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin by secretory stage ameloblasts (35–37). Mmp-20 activity can account for the range of cleavages observed in secretory stage enamel proteins (38) and appears to be the only protease secreted by ameloblasts during the secretory stage. Mmp20-null mice have enamel that is thinner and softer than normal, lacks enamel rod organization, and tends to chip off the crown surface (39, 40). Like the other secretory stage enamel proteins, Mmp20 expression appears to be restricted to developing teeth (41), as is the diseased phenotype when the human gene is defective (42–44).Klk4 is a serine protease that is secreted by transition and maturation stage ameloblasts but is not expressed by secretory stage ameloblasts (45, 46). Klk4 might also be expressed by odontoblasts, the cells that form dentin (47). Klk4 has broad substrate specificity (48, 49) and is capable of activating other proteases (50–52) and protease activated receptors (53, 54). Unlike most proteins secreted by ameloblasts, Klk4 is expressed in other tissues, most notably the prostate (55) and endometrium (56). Much attention has been focused on the potential role of Klk4 in cancers. Klk4 is increased in breast cancer stromal cells (57), in prostate cancer cells (58–61), and ovarian cancer cells (62–65). Despite this focus on the potential role of Klk4 in tumors, very little is known about the normal expression and function of Klk4 in nondental tissues. A loss of function mutation in both human KLK4 alleles caused a hypomaturation enamel phenotype in the absence of any observable defects elsewhere in the body (66).To gain insights into the role of Klk4 in normal dental enamel formation, and to better characterize the normal temporal and spatial patterns of Klk4 expression, we have used gene targeting to knock out normal Klk4 expression, while replacing the Klk4 code with lacZ, the bacterial gene encoding β-galactosidase reporter in mice. We demonstrate that Klk4 is not expressed by secretory stage ameloblasts, but is specifically expressed by ameloblasts later in enamel formation and is necessary for the proper removal of enamel proteins, the final thickening of enamel crystals, and ultimately, for hardening of the enamel layer.     

A Small Conserved Domain in the Yeast Spa2p Is Necessary and Sufficient for Its Polarized Localization

SPA2 encodes a yeast protein that is one of the first proteins to localize to sites of polarized growth, such as the shmoo tip and the incipient bud. The dynamics and requirements for Spa2p localization in living cells are examined using Spa2p green fluorescent protein fusions. Spa2p localizes to one edge of unbudded cells and subsequently is observable in the bud tip. Finally, during cytokinesis Spa2p is present as a ring at the mother–daughter bud neck. The bud emergence mutants bem1 and bem2 and mutants defective in the septins do not affect Spa2p localization to the bud tip. Strikingly, a small domain of Spa2p comprised of 150 amino acids is necessary and sufficient for localization to sites of polarized growth. This localization domain and the amino terminus of Spa2p are essential for its function in mating. Searching the yeast genome database revealed a previously uncharacterized protein which we name, Sph1p (Spa2p homolog), with significant homology to the localization domain and amino terminus of Spa2p. This protein also localizes to sites of polarized growth in budding and mating cells. SPH1, which is similar to SPA2, is required for bipolar budding and plays a role in shmoo formation. Overexpression of either Spa2p or Sph1p can block the localization of either protein fused to green fluorescent protein, suggesting that both Spa2p and Sph1p bind to and are localized by the same component. The identification of a 150–amino acid domain necessary and sufficient for localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth and the existence of this domain in another yeast protein Sph1p suggest that the early localization of these proteins may be mediated by a receptor that recognizes this small domain.Polarized cell growth and division are essential cellular processes that play a crucial role in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Cell fate can be determined by cell asymmetry during cell division (Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Cohen and Hyman, 1994; Rhyu and Knoblich, 1995). Consequently, the molecules involved in the generation and maintenance of cell asymmetry are important in the process of cell fate determination. Polarized growth can occur in response to external signals such as growth towards a nutrient (Rodriguez-Boulan and Nelson, 1989; Eaton and Simons, 1995) or hormone (Jackson and Hartwell, 1990a , b ; Segall, 1993; Keynes and Cook, 1995) and in response to internal signals as in Caenorhabditis elegans (Goldstein et al., 1993; Kimble, 1994; Priess, 1994) and Drosophila melanogaster (St Johnston and Nusslein-Volhard, 1992; Anderson, 1995) early development. Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo polarized growth towards an external cue during mating and to an internal cue during budding. Polarization towards a mating partner (shmoo formation) and towards a new bud site requires a number of proteins (Chenevert, 1994; Chant, 1996; Drubin and Nelson, 1996). Many of these proteins are necessary for both processes and are localized to sites of polarized growth, identified by the insertion of new cell wall material (Tkacz and Lampen, 1972; Farkas et al., 1974; Lew and Reed, 1993) to the shmoo tip, bud tip, and mother–daughter bud neck. In yeast, proteins localized to growth sites include cytoskeletal proteins (Adams and Pringle, 1984; Kilmartin and Adams, 1984; Ford, S.K., and J.R. Pringle. 1986. Yeast. 2:S114; Drubin et al., 1988; Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Amatruda and Cooper, 1992; Lew and Reed, 1993; Waddle et al., 1996), neck filament components (septins) (Byers and Goetsch, 1976; Kim et al., 1991; Ford and Pringle, 1991; Haarer and Pringle, 1987; Longtine et al., 1996), motor proteins (Lillie and Brown, 1994), G-proteins (Ziman, 1993; Yamochi et al., 1994; Qadota et al., 1996), and two membrane proteins (Halme et al., 1996; Roemer et al., 1996; Qadota et al., 1996). Septins, actin, and actin-associated proteins localize early in the cell cycle, before a bud or shmoo tip is recognizable. How this group of proteins is localized to and maintained at sites of cell growth remains unclear.Spa2p is one of the first proteins involved in bud formation to localize to the incipient bud site before a bud is recognizable (Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Chant, 1996). Spa2p has been localized to where a new bud will form at approximately the same time as actin patches concentrate at this region (Snyder et al., 1991). An understanding of how Spa2p localizes to incipient bud sites will shed light on the very early stages of cell polarization. Later in the cell cycle, Spa2p is also found at the mother–daughter bud neck in cells undergoing cytokinesis. Spa2p, a nonessential protein, has been shown to be involved in bud site selection (Snyder, 1989; Zahner et al., 1996), shmoo formation (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990), and mating (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990; Chenevert et al., 1994; Yorihuzi and Ohsumi, 1994; Dorer et al., 1995). Genetic studies also suggest that Spa2p has a role in cytokinesis (Flescher et al., 1993), yet little is known about how this protein is localized to sites of polarized growth.We have used Spa2p green fluorescent protein (GFP)¹ fusions to investigate the early localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth in living cells. Our results demonstrate that a small domain of ∼150 amino acids of this large 1,466-residue protein is sufficient for targeting to sites of polarized growth and is necessary for Spa2p function. Furthermore, we have identified and characterized a novel yeast protein, Sph1p, which has homology to both the Spa2p amino terminus and the Spa2p localization domain. Sph1p localizes to similar regions of polarized growth and sph1 mutants have similar phenotypes as spa2 mutants.