The Ability of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Immediate-Early Protein Vmw110 To Bind to a Ubiquitin-Specific Protease Contributes to Its Roles in the Activation of Gene Expression and Stimulation of Virus Replication

Herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early protein Vmw110 stimulates the onset of virus infection and is required for efficient reactivation from latency. In transfection assays, Vmw110 is a potent activator of gene expression, but its mode of action has yet to be determined. Previous work has shown that Vmw110 localizes to specific intranuclear structures known as ND10, PML bodies, or PODs and causes the disruption of these domains. The ability of Vmw110 to disrupt ND10 correlates with its biological activities in infected and transfected cells. It has also been found that Vmw110 binds strongly and specifically to a ubiquitin-specific protease known as HAUSP, itself a component of a subset of ND10. In this study we have investigated the role of HAUSP in Vmw110 activity; single amino acid residues of Vmw110 required for the interaction were identified, and the effects of mutation of these residues in infected and transfected cells were then assayed. The results indicate that the ability to bind to HAUSP contributes to the functional activities of Vmw110.     

Centromere Architecture Breakdown Induced by the Viral E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ICP0 Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1

The viral E3 ubiquitin ligase ICP0 protein has the unique property to temporarily localize at interphase and mitotic centromeres early after infection of cells by the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). As a consequence ICP0 induces the proteasomal degradation of several centromeric proteins (CENPs), namely CENP-A, the centromeric histone H3 variant, CENP-B and CENP-C. Following ICP0-induced centromere modification cells trigger a specific response to centromeres called interphase Centromere Damage Response (iCDR). The biological significance of the iCDR is unknown; so is the degree of centromere structural damage induced by ICP0. Interphase centromeres are complex structures made of proximal and distal protein layers closely associated to CENP-A-containing centromeric chromatin. Using several cell lines constitutively expressing GFP-tagged CENPs, we investigated the extent of the centromere destabilization induced by ICP0. We show that ICP0 provokes the disappearance from centromeres, and the proteasomal degradation of several CENPs from the NAC (CENP-A nucleosome associated) and CAD (CENP-A Distal) complexes. We then investigated the nucleosomal occupancy of the centromeric chromatin in ICP0-expressing cells by micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion analysis. ICP0 expression either following infection or in cell lines constitutively expressing ICP0 provokes significant modifications of the centromeric chromatin structure resulting in higher MNase accessibility. Finally, using human artificial chromosomes (HACs), we established that ICP0-induced iCDR could also target exogenous centromeres. These results demonstrate that, in addition to the protein complexes, ICP0 also destabilizes the centromeric chromatin resulting in the complete breakdown of the centromere architecture, which consequently induces iCDR.     

Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Regulatory Protein ICP0 Aids Infection in Cells with a Preinduced Interferon Response but Does Not Impede Interferon-Induced Gene Induction

Several independent lines of evidence indicate that interferon-mediated innate responses are involved in controlling herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection and that the viral immediate-early regulatory protein ICP0 augments HSV-1 replication in interferon-treated cells. However, this is a complex situation in which the experimental outcome is determined by the choice of multiplicity of infection and cell type and by whether cultured cells or animal models are used. It is now known that neither STAT1 nor interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) play essential roles in the replication defect of ICP0-null mutant HSV-1 in cultured cells. This study set out to investigate the specific role of ICP0 in HSV-1 resistance to the interferon defense. We have used a cell line in which ICP0 expression can be induced at levels similar to those during the early stages of a normal infection to determine whether ICP0 by itself can interfere with interferon or IRF-3-dependent signaling and whether ICP0 enables the virus to circumvent the effects of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). We found that the presence of ICP0 was unable to compromise ISG induction by either interferon or double-stranded RNA. On the other hand, ICP0 preexpression reduced but did not eliminate the inhibitory effects of ISGs on HSV-1 infection, with the extent of the relief being highly dependent on multiplicity of infection. The results are discussed in terms of the relationships between ICP0 and intrinsic and innate antiviral resistance mechanisms.The innate immune response mediated through the interferon (IFN) pathway is an important component of antiviral defense mediated by individual cells and whole organisms (10, 28). In turn, many viruses express proteins that counteract the effects of the IFN response (28). In the case of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), highly defective HSV-1 mutants activate expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) through a mechanism that is independent of IFN itself but dependent on IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) (2, 3, 19, 23, 26). HSV-1 mutants that do not express the immediate-early (IE) regulatory protein ICP0 are more sensitive than the wild-type (wt) virus to IFN pretreatment of cultured cells (13, 20), and ICP0-null mutant HSV-1 is much more pathogenic in mice unable to respond to IFN (12, 15). Furthermore, a number of experimental systems have presented evidence suggesting that a specific function of ICP0 is to interfere with IFN and/or IRF-3-dependent IFN responses (3, 16-18, 21). However, we have reported recently that the replication defect of ICP0-null mutant HSV-1 is not complemented in cultured cells lacking either STAT1 or IRF-3 (9), which raises the question of whether the relative sensitivity of ICP0-null mutant HSV-1 to an IFN-induced antiviral state results from the absence of a specific effect of ICP0 on IFN pathways or is, rather, an indirect consequence of the disabled virus being intrinsically less able to replicate in cells expressing ISGs (9).The investigation of these complex issues is difficult because sensitivity to IFN is highly dependent on multiplicity of infection (MOI) (9) and cell type (20). Therefore, we sought to develop a system in which the specific effects of ICP0 could be examined in the absence of HSV-1 infection and which avoids potential complications arising from the use of viral vectors or plasmid transfection technologies. In an accompanying paper, we describe the construction of a cell line that expresses ICP0 at physiological levels in an inducible manner (7). The cells allow 100% complementation of plaque formation by ICP0-null mutant HSV-1, and induction of ICP0 expression induces efficient reactivation of gene expression from quiescent HSV-1 genomes (7). We have used these cells to investigate whether, by itself, ICP0 is able to impede induction of ISGs in response to IFN (through the normal STAT1 signaling pathway) or to interfere with IRF-3-dependent activation of ISGs induced by double-stranded RNA, the archetypal pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). We found that preexpression of ICP0 had no deleterious effect on either pathway. On the other hand, preexpression of ICP0 decreased (but did not eliminate) the sensitivity of HSV-1 to an IFN-induced antiviral state. We discuss the relationship between ICP0 and intrinsic and innate cellular defenses to HSV-1 infection.