Actin branches out to link pathogen perception and host gene regulation

Cellular functions of actin, and associated actin binding proteins (ABPs), have been well characterized with respect to their dynamic cytosolic role as components of the complex cytoskeletal network. In this regard, the collective research in this field has vastly expanded our knowledge of the role of actin to more recently identify a key role within the nucleus as an integral part gene organization and expression. Herein, we describe the requirement of the ABP actin depolymerizing factor-4 (ADF4) as a regulator of resistance to Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 expressing the effector AvrPphB via ADF4’s cytosolic and nuclear functions. In total, our work has identified significant alterations in the expression of the resistance protein RPS5 in an ADF4 phosphorylation dependent manner. In this mini-review, we provide compelling evidence in support of both a nuclear function for ADF4, as well as potential targeting of the actin cytoskeleton bythe bacterial effector AvrPphB.     

Arabidopsis actin depolymerizing factor4 modulates the stochastic dynamic behavior of actin filaments in the cortical array of epidermal cells

Actin filament arrays are constantly remodeled as the needs of cells change as well as during responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli. Previous studies demonstrate that many single actin filaments in the cortical array of living Arabidopsis thaliana epidermal cells undergo stochastic dynamics, a combination of rapid growth balanced by disassembly from prolific severing activity. Filament turnover and dynamics are well understood from in vitro biochemical analyses and simple reconstituted systems. However, the identification in living cells of the molecular players involved in controlling actin dynamics awaits the use of model systems, especially ones where the power of genetics can be combined with imaging of individual actin filaments at high spatial and temporal resolution. Here, we test the hypothesis that actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin contributes to stochastic filament severing and facilitates actin turnover. A knockout mutant for Arabidopsis ADF4 has longer hypocotyls and epidermal cells when compared with wild-type seedlings. This correlates with a change in actin filament architecture; cytoskeletal arrays in adf4 cells are significantly more bundled and less dense than in wild-type cells. Several parameters of single actin filament turnover are also altered. Notably, adf4 mutant cells have a 2.5-fold reduced severing frequency as well as significantly increased actin filament lengths and lifetimes. Thus, we provide evidence that ADF4 contributes to the stochastic dynamic turnover of actin filaments in plant cells.     

Arabidopsis ACTIN-DEPOLYMERIZING FACTOR7 Severs Actin Filaments and Regulates Actin Cable Turnover to Promote Normal Pollen Tube Growth

Actin filaments are often arranged into higher-order structures, such as the longitudinal actin cables that generate the reverse fountain cytoplasmic streaming pattern present in pollen tubes. While several actin binding proteins have been implicated in the generation of these cables, the mechanisms that regulate their dynamic turnover remain largely unknown. Here, we show that Arabidopsis thaliana ACTIN-DEPOLYMERIZING FACTOR7 (ADF7) is required for turnover of longitudinal actin cables. In vitro biochemical analyses revealed that ADF7 is a typical ADF that prefers ADP-G-actin over ATP-G-actin. ADF7 inhibits nucleotide exchange on actin and severs filaments, but its filament severing and depolymerizing activities are less potent than those of the vegetative ADF1. ADF7 primarily decorates longitudinal actin cables in the shanks of pollen tubes. Consistent with this localization pattern, the severing frequency and depolymerization rate of filaments significantly decreased, while their maximum lifetime significantly increased, in adf7 pollen tube shanks. Furthermore, an ADF7–enhanced green fluorescent protein fusion with defective severing activity but normal G-actin binding activity could not complement adf7, providing compelling evidence that the severing activity of ADF7 is vital for its in vivo functions. These observations suggest that ADF7 evolved to promote turnover of longitudinal actin cables by severing actin filaments in pollen tubes.     

ACTIN DEPOLYMERIZING FACTOR4 Regulates Actin Dynamics during Innate Immune Signaling in Arabidopsis

Conserved microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) are sensed by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on cells of plants and animals. MAMP perception typically triggers rearrangements to actin cytoskeletal arrays during innate immune signaling. However, the signaling cascades linking PRR activation by MAMPs to cytoskeleton remodeling are not well characterized. Here, we developed a system to dissect, at high spatial and temporal resolution, the regulation of actin dynamics during innate immune signaling in plant cells. Within minutes of MAMP perception, we detected changes to single actin filament turnover in epidermal cells treated with bacterial and fungal MAMPs. These MAMP-induced alterations phenocopied an ACTIN DEPOLYMERIZING FACTOR4 (ADF4) knockout mutant. Moreover, actin arrays in the adf4 mutant were unresponsive to a bacterial MAMP, elf26, but responded normally to the fungal MAMP, chitin. Together, our data provide strong genetic and cytological evidence for the inhibition of ADF activity regulating actin remodeling during innate immune signaling. This work is the first to directly link an ADF/cofilin to the cytoskeletal rearrangements elicited directly after pathogen perception in plant or mammalian cells.     

Arabidopsis Actin-Depolymerizing Factor AtADF4 Mediates Defense Signal Transduction Triggered by the Pseudomonas syringae Effector AvrPphB

The actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in plant defenses against pathogenic fungi and oomycetes with limited, indirect evidence. To date, there are no reports linking actin with resistance against phytopathogenic bacteria. The dynamic behavior of actin filaments is regulated by a diverse array of actin-binding proteins, among which is the Actin-Depolymerizing Factor (ADF) family of proteins. Here, we demonstrate that actin dynamics play a role in the activation of gene-for-gene resistance in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) following inoculation with the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato. Using a reverse genetics approach, we explored the roles of Arabidopsis ADFs in plant defenses. AtADF4 was identified as being specifically required for resistance triggered by the effector AvrPphB but not AvrRpt2 or AvrB. Recombinant AtADF4 bound to monomeric actin (G-actin) with a marked preference for the ADP-loaded form and inhibited the rate of nucleotide exchange on G-actin, indicating that AtADF4 is a bona fide actin-depolymerizing factor. Exogenous application of the actin-disrupting agent cytochalasin D partially rescued the Atadf4 mutant in the AvrPphB-mediated hypersensitive response, demonstrating that AtADF4 mediates defense signaling through modification of the actin cytoskeleton. Unlike the mechanism by which the actin cytoskeleton confers resistance against fungi and oomycetes, AtADF4 is not involved in resistance against pathogen entry. Collectively, this study identifies AtADF4 as a novel component of the plant defense signaling pathway and provides strong evidence for actin dynamics as a primary component that orchestrates plant defenses against P. syringae.The actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in plant defenses against pathogenic fungi and oomycetes (Hardham et al., 2007). Evidence largely comes from studies using actin cytoskeleton-disrupting agents, such as cytochalasins. Treatments with a variety of cytochalasins were shown to increase the penetration rate of both adapted and nonadapted pathogens in multiple plant-pathogen systems, thereby implicating the actin cytoskeleton as having a role in basal defenses and nonhost resistance (Kobayashi et al., 1997; Yun et al., 2003; Shimada et al., 2006; Miklis et al., 2007). The actin cytoskeleton may also play a role in race-specific resistance (Skalamera and Heath, 1998). To date, no reports linking actin dynamics with resistance against phytopathogenic bacteria have been published.While the actin cytoskeleton as a virulence target of plant pathogens has not been documented, it was well characterized in mammalian pathosystems, particularly in studies investigating macrophage interactions with the pathogenic bacterium Yersinia pestis (Mattoo et al., 2007). Yersinia species deliver a suite of effectors into the target host cell, and at least four of them (YopE, YpkA/YopO, YopT, and YopH) are involved in rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton (Aepfelbacher and Heesemann, 2001). YopT, a Cys protease, targets a plasma membrane-localized Rho GTPase in affected phagocytes (Aepfelbacher and Heesemann, 2001). Cleavage of the GTPase by YopT releases the prenylated protein from the plasma membrane and disrupts the actin cytoskeleton, effectively shutting down phagocytosis, preventing elimination of the pathogen (Iriarte and Cornelis, 1998; Shao et al., 2002). Similarly, microbial pathogens also usurp host processes for the benefit of infection, disease, and death. Listeria species hijack the host''s cytoskeleton to move around inside the infected cell through the induction of directed polymerization of actin (Pistor et al., 1994). Salmonella injects into host cells two actin-binding proteins (SipA and SipC) as well as other regulators of actin dynamics to enhance phagocytic uptake and intracellular propagation (Galan and Zhou, 2000). In short, either by preventing polymerization or by promoting it, pathogens have evolved strategies to modify the host actin cytoskeleton for purposes of evading detection or eliciting disease and death.Dynamic actin cytoskeleton rearrangements are regulated by a pool of actin-binding proteins, which sense environmental changes and modulate the cytoskeleton through various biochemical activities (Hussey et al., 2006; Staiger and Blanchoin, 2006). Among the proteins that regulate these dynamic processes are the Actin-Depolymerizing Factor (ADF) family of proteins (Maciver and Hussey, 2002). In general, ADFs bind both monomeric (G-) and filamentous (F-) actin to increase actin dynamics. They function by severing F-actin to generate more ends for polymerization and by increasing the dissociation rate of actin monomers from the pointed ends (Maciver, 1998; Maciver and Hussey, 2002). Plant ADFs play roles in pollen tube growth (Chen et al., 2003), root formation (Thomas and Schiefelbein, 2002), and cold acclimation (Ouellet et al., 2001). There is also one report linking ADFs with plant defenses (Miklis et al., 2007). In that study, ectopic expression of barley (Hordeum vulgare) HvADF3 and several isovariants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ADFs in barley epidermal cells was shown to compromise penetration resistance to powdery mildew fungi (Miklis et al., 2007).The Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae interaction provides an ideal model plant-pathogen system to study plant defense signaling. Like Yersinia species, P. syringae delivers effector proteins into the host cells via the type III secretion system and relies on these proteins for pathogenesis (Alfano and Collmer, 2004). However, once these proteins (Avr) are recognized either directly or indirectly by plant resistance (R) proteins, plant immune responses are activated (Jones and Dangl, 2006). Exciting progress has been made toward understanding the indirect recognition of several pairs of Avr-R proteins; the best examples include AvrB/AvrRPM1-RPM1, AvrRpt2-RPS2, and AvrPphB-RPS5. During activation of defense mediated by AvrB/AvrRPM1-RPM1 and AvrRpt2-RPS2, the phosphorylation or elimination of a third protein, RIN4, is essential (Mackey et al., 2002; Axtell and Staskawicz, 2003). In the case of AvrPphB-RPS5 recognition, the AvrPphB Cys protease of the same family as YopT (Shao et al., 2002) cleaves the plant protein kinase PBS1, inducing a conformational change in RPS5, which in turn leads to the activation of resistance (Ade et al., 2007). Although these studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of how pathogen effectors initiate plant defense responses, the ultimate signaling processes associated with the activation of resistance remain largely unknown, due to the limited number of genetic loci identified in these pathways. In this work, we hypothesize that actin-binding proteins play a role during plant-bacteria interactions based on the functional and structural similarity between AvrPphB and YopT.There are 11 ADFs in the Arabidopsis genome (Ruzicka et al., 2007). We utilized a reverse genetics approach to identify the putative roles these proteins play in plant resistance against the bacterial pathogen P. syringae pv tomato (Pst). AtADF4 was identified as a novel signaling component in the AvrPphB-RPS5-mediated defense signal transduction pathway. Loss of AtADF4 confers on Arabidopsis enhanced susceptibility to P. syringae expressing AvrPphB. Further subcellular localization and biochemical analyses, as well as pharmacological studies, suggest that AtADF4 functions as a bona fide actin-depolymerizing factor through modifying the actin cytoskeleton. Unlike the documented mechanism by which the actin cytoskeleton plays roles in resistance against fungi and oomycetes, the resistance against P. syringae mediated by AtADF4 is not involved in hindering pathogen entry.     

A Protein Phosphatase 2A Catalytic Subunit Modulates Blue Light-Induced Chloroplast Avoidance Movements through Regulating Actin Cytoskeleton in Arabidopsis

Chloroplast avoidance movements mediated by phototropin 2 (phot2) are one of most important physiological events in the response to high-fluence blue light (BL), which reduces damage to the photosynthetic machinery under excess light. Protein phosphatase 2A-2 (PP2A-2) is an isoform of the catalytic subunit of PP2A, which regulates a number of developmental processes. To investigate whether PP2A-2 was involved in high-fluence BL-induced chloroplast avoidance movements, we first analyzed chloroplast migration in the leaves of the pp2a-2 mutant in response to BL. The data showed that PP2A-2 might act as a positive regulator in phot2-mediated chloroplast avoidance movements, but not in phot1-mediated chloroplast accumulation movements. Then, the effect of okadaic acid (OA) and cantharidin (selective PP2A inhibitors) on high-fluence BL response was further investigated in Arabidopsis thaliana mesophyll cells. Within a certain concentration range, exogenously applied OA or cantharidin inhibited the high-fluence BL-induced chloroplast movements in a concentration-dependent manner. Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin phosphorylation assays demonstrated that PP2A-2 can activate/dephosphorylate ADF/cofilin, an actin-binding protein, in Arabidopsis mesophyll cells. Consistent with this observation, the experiments showed that OA could inhibit ADF1 binding to the actin and suppress the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton after high-fluence BL irradiation. The adf1 and adf3 mutants also exhibited reduced high-fluence BL-induced chloroplast avoidance movements. In conclusion, we identified that PP2A-2 regulated the activation of ADF/cofilin, which, in turn, regulated actin cytoskeleton remodeling and was involved in phot2-mediated chloroplast avoidance movements.     

Recognition of the Protein Kinase AVRPPHB SUSCEPTIBLE1 by the Disease Resistance Protein RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE5 Is Dependent on S-Acylation and an Exposed Loop in AVRPPHB SUSCEPTIBLE1

The recognition of pathogen effector proteins by plants is typically mediated by intracellular receptors belonging to the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) family. NLR proteins often detect pathogen effector proteins indirectly by detecting modification of their targets. How NLR proteins detect such modifications is poorly understood. To address these questions, we have been investigating the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) NLR protein RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE5 (RPS5), which detects the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein Avirulence protein Pseudomonas phaseolicolaB (AvrPphB). AvrPphB is a cysteine protease that specifically targets a subfamily of receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases, including the Arabidopsis protein kinase AVRPPHB Susceptible1 (PBS1). RPS5 is activated by the cleavage of PBS1 at the apex of its activation loop. Here, we show that RPS5 activation requires that PBS1 be localized to the plasma membrane and that plasma membrane localization of PBS1 is mediated by amino-terminal S-acylation. We also describe the development of a high-throughput screen for mutations in PBS1 that block RPS5 activation, which uncovered four new pbs1 alleles, two of which blocked cleavage by AvrPphB. Lastly, we show that RPS5 distinguishes among closely related kinases by the amino acid sequence (SEMPH) within an exposed loop in the C-terminal one-third of PBS1. The SEMPH loop is located on the opposite side of PBS1 from the AvrPphB cleavage site, suggesting that RPS5 associates with the SEMPH loop while leaving the AvrPphB cleavage site exposed. These findings provide support for a model of NLR activation in which NLR proteins form a preactivation complex with effector targets and then sense a conformational change in the target induced by effector modification.Pathogen recognition by plants is mediated by both transmembrane cell surface receptors and intracellular receptors (Jones and Dangl, 2006). The latter receptors typically belong to the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) superfamily of proteins, which also play a central role in the innate immune systems of many animals, including humans (von Moltke et al., 2013). In plants, most NLR proteins detect pathogen “effector” proteins, which are proteins secreted by pathogens to promote virulence on susceptible hosts. The immune response activated by NLR proteins is thus referred to as effector-triggered immunity. In the majority of examples studied, effector-triggered immunity is accompanied by localized host cell death around the site of pathogen ingress, which is referred to as the hypersensitive response (HR; Goodman and Novacky, 1994).Several NLR proteins have been shown to detect pathogen effector proteins indirectly by detecting the modification of other host proteins mediated by the effectors (DeYoung and Innes, 2006). The best characterized examples of NLR proteins that employ indirect recognition mechanisms are the RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS MACULICOLA1 (RPM1) and RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE2 (RPS2) proteins of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), which detect modification to the RPM1 INTERACTING4 (RIN4) protein (Mackey et al., 2002; Axtell and Staskawicz, 2003), the RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE5 (RPS5) protein of Arabidopsis, which detects modification of the AVRPPHB SUSCEPTIBLE1 (PBS1) protein kinase (Ade et al., 2007), and the Pseudomonas resistance and fenthion sensitivity (Prf) protein of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), which detects modification of the Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato resistance (Pto) protein kinase (Salmeron et al., 1996; Rathjen et al., 1999). Our group has focused on RPS5, which detects the effector protein Avirulence protein Pseudomonas phaseolicolaB (AvrPphB) from Pseudomonas syringae (Simonich and Innes, 1995). AvrPphB functions as a Cys protease (Zhu et al., 2004) and specifically targets a subclass of plant receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases that include PBS1 (Shao et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2010). AvrPphB likely targets these kinases in order to suppress defense responses induced by cell surface-localized plant immune receptors such as FLAGELLIN SENSITIVE2 (FLS2; Zhang et al., 2010). PBS1 can be coimmunoprecipitated with FLS2, and mutation of PBS1 reduces FLS2-mediated production of hydrogen peroxide and callose deposits (Zhang et al., 2010), confirming that PBS1 functions in defense signaling.Cleavage of PBS1 by AvrPphB is both necessary and sufficient to activate RPS5 (Ade et al., 2007), and null mutations in PBS1 block RPS5 activation (Swiderski and Innes, 2001). Because AvrPphB can cleave multiple closely related kinases in Arabidopsis (Zhang et al., 2010), these observations indicate that RPS5 can distinguish among these kinases, with only PBS1 cleavage activating RPS5. The molecular basis for this specificity is unknown.One contributor to the specificity of RPS5 may be subcellular localization. RPS5 localizes to the plasma membrane (PM), and amino acid substitutions that displace RPS5 from the PM eliminate RPS5-mediated defense responses (Qi et al., 2012). PBS1 is also expected to localize to the PM, because fusion of the N-terminal 100 amino acids of PBS1 to GFP causes GFP to localize to the PM in both Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana (Takemoto et al., 2012). Consistent with this expectation, PBS1 and RPS5 can be coimmunoprecipitated when transiently overexpressed in N. benthamiana (Ade et al., 2007). Furthermore, AvrPphB is both myristoylated and palmitoylated upon entry into plant cells and localizes to the PM, with PM localization of AvrPphB being required for the activation of RPS5 (Dowen et al., 2009). Although these data all point to a PM localization for PBS1, full-length PBS1 protein has not yet been localized, nor has the functional significance of PBS1 localization been assessed relative to the activation of RPS5.In this study, we demonstrate that PBS1 is targeted to the PM via S-acylation at its N terminus and that PM localization is required for RPS5 activation. We also describe a high-throughput genetic screen for uncovering new mutations in PBS1 that block RPS5 activation, which uncovered four new pbs1 alleles. Lastly, we show that RPS5 distinguishes PBS1 from closely related kinases based on a specific loop in the C-terminal half of PBS1.     

Activation of a plant nucleotide binding-leucine rich repeat disease resistance protein by a modified self protein

Nucleotide binding-leucine rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins function as intracellular receptors for the detection of pathogens in both plants and animals. Despite their central role in innate immunity, the molecular mechanisms that govern NB-LRR activation are poorly understood. The Arabidopsis NB-LRR protein RPS5 detects the presence of the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein AvrPphB by monitoring the status of the Arabidopsis protein kinase PBS1. AvrPphB is a cysteine protease that targets PBS1 for cleavage at a single site within the activation loop of PBS1. Using a transient expression system in the plant Nicotiana benthamiana and stable transgenic Arabidopsis plants we found that both PBS1 cleavage products are required to activate RPS5 and can do so in the absence of AvrPphB. We also found, however, that the requirement for cleavage of PBS1 could be bypassed simply by inserting five amino acids at the PBS1 cleavage site, which is located at the apex of the activation loop of PBS1. Activation of RPS5 did not require PBS1 kinase function, and thus RPS5 appears to sense a subtle conformational change in PBS1, rather than cleavage. This finding suggests that NB-LRR proteins may function as fine-tuned sensors of alterations in the structures of effector targets.     

Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4

Plants have evolved a sophisticated innate immune system to recognize invading pathogens and to induce a set of host defense mechanisms resulting in disease resistance. Pathogen recognition is often mediated by plant disease resistance (R) proteins that respond specifically to one or a few pathogen-derived molecules. This specificity has led to suggestions of a receptor-ligand mode of R protein function. Delivery of the bacterial effector protein AvrRpt2 by Pseudomonas syringae specifically induces disease resistance in Arabidopsis plants expressing the RPS2 R protein. We demonstrate that RPS2 physically interacts with Arabidopsis RIN4 and that AvrRpt2 causes the elimination of RIN4 during activation of the RPS2 pathway. AvrRpt2-mediated RIN4 elimination also occurs in the rps2, ndr1, and Atrar1 mutant backgrounds, demonstrating that this activity can be achieved independent of an RPS2-mediated signaling pathway. Therefore, we suggest that RPS2 initiates signaling based upon perception of RIN4 disappearance rather than direct recognition of AvrRpt2.     

The Effects of ADF/Cofilin and Profilin on the Conformation of the ATP-Binding Cleft of Monomeric Actin

Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin and profilin are small actin-binding proteins, which have central roles in cytoskeletal dynamics in all eukaryotes. When bound to an actin monomer, ADF/cofilins inhibit the nucleotide exchange, whereas most profilins accelerate the nucleotide exchange on actin monomers. In this study the effects of ADF/cofilin and profilin on the accessibility of the actin monomer''s ATP-binding pocket was investigated by a fluorescence spectroscopic method. The fluorescence of the actin bound ɛ-ATP was quenched with a neutral quencher (acrylamide) in steady-state and time dependent experiments, and the data were analyzed with a complex form of the Stern-Volmer equation. The experiments revealed that in the presence of ADF/cofilin the accessibility of the bound ɛ-ATP decreased, indicating a closed and more compact ATP-binding pocket induced by the binding of ADF/cofilin. In the presence of profilin the accessibility of the bound ɛ-ATP increased, indicating a more open and approachable protein matrix around the ATP-binding pocket. The results of the fluorescence quenching experiments support a structural mechanism regarding the regulation of the nucleotide exchange on actin monomers by ADF/cofilin and profilin.     

Structure-function analysis of the coiled-coil and leucine-rich repeat domains of the RPS5 disease resistance protein

The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE5 (RPS5) disease resistance protein mediates recognition of the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein AvrPphB. RPS5 belongs to the coiled-coil-nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (CC-NBS-LRR) family and is activated by AvrPphB-mediated cleavage of the protein kinase PBS1. Here, we present a structure-function analysis of the CC and LRR domains of RPS5 using transient expression assays in Nicotiana benthamiana. We found that substituting the CC domain of RPS2 for the RPS5 CC domain did not alter RPS5 specificity and only moderately reduced its ability to activate programmed cell death, suggesting that the CC domain does not play a direct role in the recognition of PBS1 cleavage. Analysis of an RPS5-super Yellow Fluorescent Protein fusion revealed that RPS5 localizes to the plasma membrane (PM). Alanine substitutions of predicted myristoylation (glycine-2) and palmitoylation (cysteine-4) residues affected RPS5 PM localization, protein stability, and function in an additive manner, indicating that PM localization is essential to RPS5 function. The first 20 amino acids of RPS5 were sufficient for directing super Yellow Fluorescent Protein to the PM. C-terminal truncations of RPS5 revealed that the first four LRR repeats are sufficient for inhibiting RPS5 autoactivation; however, the complete LRR domain was required for the recognition of PBS1 cleavage. Substitution of the RPS2 LRR domain resulted in the autoactivation of RPS5, indicating that the LRR domain must coevolve with the NBS domain. We conclude that the RPS5 LRR domain functions to suppress RPS5 activation in the absence of PBS1 cleavage and promotes RPS5 activation in its presence.     

Aip1p Dynamics Are Altered by the R256H Mutation in Actin

Mutations in actin cause a range of human diseases due to specific molecular changes that often alter cytoskeletal function. In this study, imaging of fluorescently tagged proteins using total internal fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy is used to visualize and quantify changes in cytoskeletal dynamics. TIRF microscopy and the use of fluorescent tags also allows for quantification of the changes in cytoskeletal dynamics caused by mutations in actin. Using this technique, quantification of cytoskeletal function in live cells valuably complements in vitro studies of protein function. As an example, missense mutations affecting the actin residue R256 have been identified in three human actin isoforms suggesting this amino acid plays an important role in regulatory interactions. The effects of the actin mutation R256H on cytoskeletal movements were studied using the yeast model. The protein, Aip1, which is known to assist cofilin in actin depolymerization, was tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) at the N-terminus and tracked in vivo using TIRF microscopy. The rate of Aip1p movement in both wild type and mutant strains was quantified. In cells expressing R256H mutant actin, Aip1p motion is restricted and the rate of movement is nearly half the speed measured in wild type cells (0.88 ± 0.30 μm/sec in R256H cells compared to 1.60 ± 0.42 μm/sec in wild type cells, p < 0.005).     

Actin Depolymerizing Factor (ADF/Cofilin) Enhances the Rate of Filament Turnover: Implication in Actin-based Motility

Actin-binding proteins of the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family are thought to control actin-based motile processes. ADF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana appears to be a good model that is functionally similar to other members of the family. The function of ADF in actin dynamics has been examined using a combination of physical–chemical methods and actin-based motility assays, under physiological ionic conditions and at pH 7.8. ADF binds the ADPbound forms of G- or F-actin with an affinity two orders of magnitude higher than the ATP- or ADP-Pi– bound forms. A major property of ADF is its ability to enhance the in vitro turnover rate (treadmilling) of actin filaments to a value comparable to that observed in vivo in motile lamellipodia. ADF increases the rate of propulsion of Listeria monocytogenes in highly diluted, ADF-limited platelet extracts and shortens the actin tails. These effects are mediated by the participation of ADF in actin filament assembly, which results in a change in the kinetic parameters at the two ends of the actin filament. The kinetic effects of ADF are end specific and cannot be accounted for by filament severing. The main functionally relevant effect is a 25-fold increase in the rate of actin dissociation from the pointed ends, while the rate of dissociation from the barbed ends is unchanged. This large increase in the rate-limiting step of the monomer-polymer cycle at steady state is responsible for the increase in the rate of actin-based motile processes. In conclusion, the function of ADF is not to sequester G-actin. ADF uses ATP hydrolysis in actin assembly to enhance filament dynamics.     

Modulation of ROS production and hormone levels by AHK5 during abiotic and biotic stress signaling

Histidine kinases have been shown to mediate responses to endogenous and exogenous stimuli in organisms such as yeast, bacteria and plants. In the model plant Arabidopsis, histidine kinases have been shown to function in hormone signaling, and abiotic and biotic stress responses. More recently, the least characterized of the Arabidopsis histidine kinases, AHK5, was demonstrated to function in resistance toward the virulent bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000) and the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, and as a negative regulator of tolerance toward salinity. Here, we present data which indicate that AHK5 also impacts on drought stress resistance and on the outcome of an incompatible interaction with avrRpm1-expressing PstDC3000 (PstDC3000 (avrRpm1)). We present a model which proposes a role for reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hormones in integrating abiotic and biotic stress responses via AHK5.     

Activation of ADF/cofilin by phosphorylation-regulated Slingshot phosphatase is required for the meiotic spindle assembly in Xenopus laevis oocytes

We identify Xenopus ADF/cofilin (XAC) and its activator, Slingshot phosphatase (XSSH), as key regulators of actin dynamics essential for spindle microtubule assembly during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Phosphorylation of XSSH at multiple sites within the tail domain occurs just after germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) and is accompanied by dephosphorylation of XAC, which was mostly phosphorylated in immature oocytes. This XAC dephosphorylation after GVBD is completely suppressed by latrunculin B, an actin monomer–sequestering drug. On the other hand, jasplakinolide, an F-actin–stabilizing drug, induces dephosphorylation of XAC. Effects of latrunculin B and jasplakinolide are reconstituted in cytostatic factor–arrested extracts (CSF extracts), and XAC dephosphorylation is abolished by depletion of XSSH from CSF extracts, suggesting that XSSH functions as an actin filament sensor to facilitate actin filament dynamics via XAC activation. Injection of anti-XSSH antibody, which blocks full phosphorylation of XSSH after GVBD, inhibits both meiotic spindle formation and XAC dephosphorylation. Coinjection of constitutively active XAC with the antibody suppresses this phenotype. Treatment of oocytes with jasplakinolide also impairs spindle formation. These results strongly suggest that elevation of actin dynamics by XAC activation through XSSH phosphorylation is required for meiotic spindle assembly in Xenopus laevis.