A Host RNA Helicase-Like Protein,AtRH8, Interacts with the Potyviral Genome-Linked Protein,VPg, Associates with the Virus Accumulation Complex,and Is Essential for Infection

The viral genome-linked protein, VPg, of potyviruses is a multifunctional protein involved in viral genome translation and replication. Previous studies have shown that both eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and eIF4G or their respective isoforms from the eIF4F complex, which modulates the initiation of protein translation, selectively interact with VPg and are required for potyvirus infection. Here, we report the identification of two DEAD-box RNA helicase-like proteins, PpDDXL and AtRH8 from peach (Prunus persica) and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), respectively, both interacting with VPg. We show that AtRH8 is dispensable for plant growth and development but necessary for potyvirus infection. In potyvirus-infected Nicotiana benthamiana leaf tissues, AtRH8 colocalizes with the chloroplast-bound virus accumulation vesicles, suggesting a possible role of AtRH8 in viral genome translation and replication. Deletion analyses of AtRH8 have identified the VPg-binding region. Comparison of this region and the corresponding region of PpDDXL suggests that they are highly conserved and share the same secondary structure. Moreover, overexpression of the VPg-binding region from either AtRH8 or PpDDXL suppresses potyvirus accumulation in infected N. benthamiana leaf tissues. Taken together, these data demonstrate that AtRH8, interacting with VPg, is a host factor required for the potyvirus infection process and that both AtRH8 and PpDDXL may be manipulated for the development of genetic resistance against potyvirus infections.Plant viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that infect many agriculturally important crops and cause severe losses each year. One of the common characteristics of plant viruses is their relatively small genome that encodes a limited number of viral proteins, making them dependent on host factors to fulfill their infection cycles (Maule et al., 2002; Whitham and Wang, 2004; Nelson and Citovsky, 2005; Decroocq et al., 2006). In order to establish a successful infection, the invading virus must recruit an array of host proteins (host factors) to translate and replicate its genome and to move locally from cell to cell via the plasmodesmata and systemically via the vascular system. It has been suggested that down-regulation or mutation of some of the required host factors may result in recessively inherited resistance to viruses (Kang et al., 2005b).Potyviruses, belonging to the genus Potyvirus in the family Potyviradae, constitute the largest group of plant viruses (Rajamäki et al., 2004). Potyviruses have a single positive-strand RNA genome approximately 10 kb in length, with a viral genome-linked protein (VPg) covalently attached to the 5′ end and a poly(A) tail at the 3′ end (Urcuqui-Inchima et al., 2001; Rajamäki et al., 2004). The viral genome contains a single open reading frame (ORF) that translates into a polypeptide with a molecular mass of approximately 350 kD, which is cleaved into 10 mature proteins by viral proteases (Urcuqui-Inchima et al., 2001). Recently, a novel viral protein resulting from a frameshift in the P3 cistron has been reported (Chung et al., 2008). Of the 11 viral proteins, VPg is a multifunctional protein and the only other viral protein present in the viral particles (virions) besides the coat protein and the cylindrical inclusion protein (CI; Oruetxebarria et al., 2001; Puustinen et al., 2002; Gabrenaite-Verkhovskaya et al., 2008). The nonstructural protein is linked to the viral RNA by a phosphodiester bond between the 5′ terminal uridine residue of the RNA and the O⁴-hydroxyl group of amino acid Tyr (Murphy et al., 1996; Oruetxebarria et al., 2001; Puustinen et al., 2002). Mutation of the Tyr residue that links VPg to the viral RNA abolishes virus infectivity completely (Murphy et al., 1996). In infected cells, VPg and its precursor NIa are present in the nucleus and in the membrane-associated virus replication vesicles in the cytoplasm (Carrington et al., 1993; Rajamäki and Valkonen, 2003; Cotton et al., 2009). As a component of the replication complex, VPg may serve as a primer for viral RNA replication (Puustinen and Mäkinen, 2004) and as an analog of the m⁷G cap of mRNAs for the viral genome to recruit the translation complex for translation (Michon et al., 2006; Beauchemin et al., 2007; Khan et al., 2008). Furthermore, VPg has been suggested to be an avirulence factor for recessive resistance genes in diverse plant species (Moury et al., 2004; Kang et al., 2005b; Bruun-Rasmussen et al., 2007). Thus, VPg plays a pivotal role in the virus infection process. The molecular identification of VPg-interacting host proteins and the subsequent functional characterization of such interactions may advance knowledge of the intricate virus replication mechanisms and help develop novel antiviral strategies.Previous studies have shown that VPg and its precursor NIa interact with several host proteins, including three essential components of the host protein translation apparatus (Thivierge et al., 2008). The first protein is the cellular translation initiation factor eIF4E or its isoform eIF(iso)4E, identified through a yeast two-hybrid screen using VPg as a bait (Wittmann et al., 1997; Schaad et al., 2000). The protein complex of VPg and eIF4E is an essential component for virus infectivity (Robaglia and Caranta, 2006). Mutations and knockout of eIF4E or eIF(iso)4E confer resistance to infection (Lellis et al., 2002; Ruffel et al., 2002; Nicaise et al., 2003; Gao et al., 2004; Kang et al., 2005a; Ruffel et al., 2005; Decroocq et al., 2006; Bruun-Rasmussen et al., 2007). It is well known that potyviruses recruit selectively one of the eIF4E isoforms, depending on specific virus-host combinations (German-Retana et al., 2008). For instance, in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), eIF(iso)4E is required for infection by Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV), Plum pox virus (PPV), and Lettuce mosaic virus, while eIF4E is indispensable for infection by Clover yellow vein virus (Duprat et al., 2002; Lellis et al., 2002; Sato et al., 2005; Decroocq et al., 2006). The second cellular protein interacting with VPg is another translation initiation factor, eIF4G. Analysis of Arabidopsis knockout mutants for eIF4G or its isomers eIF(iso)4G1 and eIF(iso)4G2 has yielded results supporting the idea that the recruitment of eIF4G for potyvirus infection is also isoform dependent (Nicaise et al., 2007). Recently, poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), the translation initiation factor that bridges the 5′ and 3′ termini of the mRNA into proximity, has been proposed to be essential for efficient multiplication of TuMV (Dufresne et al., 2008). PABP was previously documented to interact with NIa, a VPg precursor containing both VPg and the proteinase NIa-Pro (Léonard et al., 2004). As the translation factors eIF(iso)4E and PABP have been found to be internalized in virus-induced vesicles, it has been suggested that the interactions between VPg and these translation factors are crucial for viral RNA translation and/or replication (Beauchemin and Laliberté, 2007; Beauchemin et al., 2007; Cotton et al., 2009). Besides these three translation factors, a Cys-rich plant protein, potyvirus VPg-interaction protein, was also found to associate with VPg (Dunoyer et al., 2004). This plant-specific VPg-interacting host protein contains a PHD finger domain and acts as an ancillary factor to support potyvirus infection and movement (Dunoyer et al., 2004).In this study, we describe the identification of an Arabidopsis DEAD-box RNA helicase (DDX), AtRH8, and a peach (Prunus persica) DDX-like protein, PpDDXL, both interacting with the potyviral VPg protein. Using the atrh8 mutant, we demonstrate that AtRH8 is not required for plant growth and development in Arabidopsis but is necessary for infection by two plant potyviruses, PPV and TuMV. Furthermore, we present evidence that AtRH8 colocalizes with the virus accumulation complex in potyvirus-infected leaf tissues, which reveals a possible role of AtRH8 in virus infection. Finally, we have identified the VPg-binding region (VPg-BR) of AtRH8 and PpDDX and show that overexpression of the VPg-BR either from AtRH8 or PpDDXL suppresses virus accumulation.     

Requirement of RNA Binding of Mammalian Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4GI (eIF4GI) for Efficient Interaction of eIF4E with the mRNA Cap

Eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5′-terminal cap structure (cap), m⁷GpppN, which facilitates ribosome binding. The cap is bound by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which is composed of eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A. eIF4E is the cap-binding subunit, eIF4A is an RNA helicase, and eIF4G is a scaffolding protein that bridges between the mRNA and ribosome. eIF4G contains an RNA-binding domain, which was suggested to stimulate eIF4E interaction with the cap in mammals. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however, such an effect was not observed. Here, we used recombinant proteins to reconstitute the cap binding of the mammalian eIF4E-eIF4GI complex to investigate the importance of the RNA-binding region of eIF4GI for cap interaction with eIF4E. We demonstrate that chemical cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity. Furthermore, the fusion of RNA recognition motif 1 (RRM1) of the La autoantigen to the N terminus of eIF4GI confers enhanced association between the cap structure and eIF4E. These results demonstrate that eIF4GI serves to anchor eIF4E to the mRNA and enhance its interaction with the cap structure.The cap structure, m⁷GpppN, is present at the 5′ terminus of all nuclear transcribed eukaryotic mRNAs. Cap-dependent binding of the ribosome to mRNA is mediated by the cap-binding protein eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), which forms a complex termed eIF4F together with eIF4G and eIF4A. Mammalian eIF4G, which has two isoforms, eIF4GI and eIF4GII, is a modular, multifunctional protein that binds to poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) (14) and eIF4E (18, 20) via the N-terminal third region. Mammalian eIF4G binds to eIF4A and eIF3 (15) via the middle third region and to eIF4A and Mnk protein kinase at the C-terminal region. eIF4GI also possesses an RNA-binding sequence (2, 9, 33) in the middle region. There are two RNA-binding sites on eIF4GI; one is located amino terminal to the first HEAT domain, and the other is located within the first HEAT domain (23). Mammalian and Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E are similar in size (24 kDa), but mammalian eIF4GI (220 kDa) is larger than its yeast counterpart (150 kDa), as the latter lacks a C-terminal domain corresponding to mammalian eIF4GI (38).The affinity of eIF4E for the cap structure has been a matter of dispute for some time. The earlier works of Carberry et al. (4) and Ueda et al. (39) estimated the equilibrium dissociation constant (K_d) of the eIF4E-cap complex by fluorescence titration to be 2 × 10⁻⁶ to 5 × 10⁻⁶ M depending on the nature of the cap analog. Later on, development of a new methodology for the fluorescence titration experiments yielded K_d values of 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁸ (29, 41). The source of the difference with the previous reports was thoroughly analyzed (29, 30). The interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI. This was first reported by showing that cross-linking of mammalian eIF4E to the cap structure is more efficient when it is a subunit of the eIF4F complex (19) or when it is complexed to eIF4GI (11). A similar enhancement of the binding of eIF4E to the cap structure was observed in yeast (40). However, two very different mechanisms were proposed to explain these observations. For the mammalian system, it was postulated that the middle segment of eIF4GI, which binds RNA, stabilizes the eIF4E interaction with the cap structure (11). This model was based primarily on the finding that in poliovirus-infected cells, eIF4GI is cleaved between its N-terminal third and the middle third, and consequently, eIF4E remains attached to the N-terminal eIF4GI fragment lacking the RNA-binding region. Under these conditions, cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure was poor (19, 31). In contrast, in yeast, a strong interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E was achieved using an eIF4G fragment containing the eIF4E-binding site that lacks the RNA-binding region (34, 40). Also, the yeast eIF4G fragment from amino acids 393 to 490 (fragment 393-490), which does not contain the RNA-binding site, forms a right-handed helical ring that wraps around the N terminus of eIF4E. This conformational change was suggested in turn to engender an allosteric enhancement of the association of eIF4E with the cap structure (10). Such an interaction between mammalian eIF4GI and eIF4E has not been reported.To understand the mechanism by which eIF4GI stimulates the interaction of eIF4E with the cap structure in mammals, we reconstituted the eIF4E-cap recognition activity in vitro with purified eIF4E and eIF4GI recombinant proteins. Using a chemical cross-linking assay, we demonstrate that only mammalian eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity enhance the cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure. Our data provide new insight into the mechanism of cap recognition by the eIF4E-eIF4GI complex.     

SUGAR-INSENSITIVE3, a RING E3 Ligase,Is a New Player in Plant Sugar Response

Sugars, such as sucrose and glucose, have been implicated in the regulation of diverse developmental events in plants and other organisms. We isolated an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutant, sugar-insensitive3 (sis3), that is resistant to the inhibitory effects of high concentrations of exogenous glucose and sucrose on early seedling development. In contrast to wild-type plants, sis3 mutants develop green, expanded cotyledons and true leaves when sown on medium containing high concentrations (e.g. 270 mm) of sucrose. Unlike some other sugar response mutants, sis3 exhibits wild-type responses to the inhibitory effects of abscisic acid and paclobutrazol, a gibberellic acid biosynthesis inhibitor, on seed germination. Map-based cloning revealed that SIS3 encodes a RING finger protein. Complementation of the sis3-2 mutant with a genomic SIS3 clone restored sugar sensitivity of sis3-2, confirming the identity of the SIS3 gene. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that SIS3 is functional in an in vitro ubiquitination assay and that the RING motif is sufficient for its activity. Our results indicate that SIS3 encodes a ubiquitin E3 ligase that is a positive regulator of sugar signaling during early seedling development.Almost all living organisms rely on the products of plant photosynthesis for sustenance, either directly or indirectly. Carbohydrates, the major photosynthates, provide both energy and carbon skeletons for fungi, plants, and animals. In addition, sugars, such as Suc and Glc, function as signaling molecules to regulate plant growth, development, gene expression, and metabolic processes. Sugar response pathways are integrated with other signaling pathways, such as those for light, phytohormones, stress, and nitrogen (Dijkwel et al., 1997; Zhou et al., 1998; Roitsch, 1999; Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000; Huijser et al., 2000; Laby et al., 2000; Coruzzi and Zhou, 2001; Rook et al., 2001; Rolland et al., 2006).Several components of plant sugar response pathways have been identified based on the conservation of sugar-sensing mechanisms among eukaryotic cells (Rolland et al., 2001, 2006) or by mutant screens. Yeast HEXOKINASE2 functions in the Glc-mediated catabolite repression pathway (Entian, 1980). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutations in HEXOKINASE1 (HXK1) cause a Glc-insensitive phenotype, and HXK1 demonstrates dual functions in Glc sensing and metabolism (Moore et al., 2003; Cho et al., 2006). Recent studies revealed the involvement of G-protein-coupled receptor systems in sugar response in yeast and Arabidopsis (Chen et al., 2003; Lemaire et al., 2004). Arabidopsis regulator of G-protein signaling1 (rgs1) mutant seedlings are insensitive to 6% Glc (Chen and Jones, 2004), whereas G-protein α-subunit (gpa1) null mutant seedlings are hypersensitive to Glc (Chen et al., 2003). The SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 protein kinases are postulated to be global regulators of energy control (Polge and Thomas, 2007). Studies conducted on two members of the Arabidopsis SnRK1 (for SNF1-Related Protein Kinases1) family, AKIN10 and AKIN11, have revealed their pivotal roles in stress and sugar signaling (Baena-González et al., 2007). A genetic screen for reduced seedling growth on 175 mm Suc identified the pleiotropic regulatory locus1 (prl1) mutant, which encodes a nuclear WD protein. Further analyses revealed that PRL1 functions in Glc and phytohormone responses (Németh et al., 1998). Interestingly, PRL1 negatively regulates the Arabidopsis SnRK1s AKIN10 and AKIN11 in vitro (Bhalerao et al., 1999).Isolation of additional mutants defective in sugar response has revealed cross talk between sugar and phytohormone response pathways. For example, abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis and signaling mutants have been isolated by several genetic screens for seedlings with reduced responses to the inhibitory effects of high levels of Suc or Glc on seedling development. These mutants include abscisic acid-deficient1 (aba1), aba2, aba3, salt-tolerant1/nine-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase3, abscisic acid-insensitive3 (abi3), and abi4 (Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000; Huijser et al., 2000; Laby et al., 2000; Rook et al., 2001; Cheng et al., 2002; Rolland et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2008), indicating interplay between ABA- and sugar-mediated signaling. Ethylene also exhibits interactions with sugars in controlling seedling development. Both the ethylene overproduction mutant eto1 and the constitutive ethylene response mutant ctr1 exhibit Glc (Zhou et al., 1998) and Suc (Gibson et al., 2001) insensitivity, whereas the ethylene-insensitive mutants etr1, ein2, and ein4 show sugar hypersensitivity (Zhou et al., 1998; Gibson et al., 2001; Cheng et al., 2002).Further characterization of sugar response factors has suggested that ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation may play a role in sugar response. In particular, the PRL1-binding domains of SnRK1s have been shown to recruit SKP1/ASK1, a conserved SCF ubiquitin ligase subunit, as well as the α4/PAD1 proteasomal subunit, indicating a role for SnRK1s in mediating proteasomal binding of SCF ubiquitin ligases (Farrás et al., 2001). In addition, recent studies indicate that PRL1 is part of a CUL4-based E3 ligase and that AKIN10 exhibits decreased rates of degradation in prl1 than in wild-type extracts (Lee et al., 2008). The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway plays important roles in many cellular processes and signal transduction pathways in yeast, animals, and plants (Hochstrasser, 1996; Hershko and Ciechanover, 1998; Smalle and Vierstra, 2004). The key task of the pathway is to selectively ubiquitinate substrate proteins and target them for degradation by the 26S proteasome. In short, the multistep ubiquitination process starts with the formation of a thiol-ester linkage between ubiquitin and a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1). The activated ubiquitin is then transferred to a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and a ubiquitin protein ligase (E3) then mediates the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to the substrate protein. The specificity of the pathway is largely realized by the E3s, which recognize the substrates that should be ubiquitinated. In Arabidopsis, more than 1,300 genes encode putative E3 subunits and the E3 ligases can be grouped into defined families based upon the presence of HECT (for Homology to E6-AP C Terminus), RING (for Really Interesting New Gene), or U-box domains (Smalle and Vierstra, 2004). The RING-type E3s can be subdivided into single-subunit E3s, which contain the substrate recognition and RING finger domains on the same protein, and multisubunit E3s, which include the SCF (for Skp1-Cullin-F-box), CUL3-BTB (for Broad-complex, Tramtrack, Bric-a-Brac), and APC (for Anaphase-Promoting Complex) complexes (Weissman, 2001; Moon et al., 2004).The Cys-rich RING finger was first described in the early 1990s (Freemont et al., 1991). It is defined as a linear series of conserved Cys and His residues (C3HC/HC3) that bind two zinc atoms in a cross-brace arrangement. RING fingers can be divided into two types, C3HC4 (RING-HC) and C3H2C3 (RING-H2), depending on the presence of either a Cys or a His residue in the fifth position of the motif (Lovering et al., 1993; Freemont, 2000). A recent study of the RING finger ubiquitin ligase family encoded by the Arabidopsis genome resulted in the identification of 469 predicted proteins containing one or more RING domains (Stone et al., 2005). However, the in vivo biological functions of all but a few of the RING proteins remain unknown. Recent studies have implicated several Arabidopsis RING proteins in a variety biological processes, including COP1 and CIP8 (photomorphogenesis; Hardtke et al., 2002; Seo et al., 2004), SINAT5 (auxin signaling; Xie et al., 2002), ATL2 (defense signaling; Serrano and Guzman, 2004), BRH1 (brassinosteroid response; Molnár et al., 2002), RIE1 (seed development; Xu and Li, 2003), NLA (nitrogen limitation adaptation; Peng et al., 2007), HOS1 (cold response; Dong et al., 2006), AIP2 (ABA signaling; Zhang et al., 2005), KEG (ABA signaling; Stone et al., 2006), and SDIR1 (ABA signaling; Zhang et al., 2007).Here, we report the isolation, identification, and characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant, sugar-insensitive3 (sis3), which is resistant to the early seedling developmental arrest caused by high exogenous sugar levels. The responsible locus, SIS3, was identified through a map-based cloning approach and confirmed with additional T-DNA insertional mutants and complementation tests. The SIS3 gene encodes a protein with a RING-H2 domain and three putative transmembrane domains. Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-SIS3 recombinant proteins exhibit in vitro ubiquitin E3 ligase activity. Together, these results indicate that a ubiquitination pathway involving the SIS3 RING protein is required to mediate the sugar response during early seedling development.     

FIBRILLIN4 Is Required for Plastoglobule Development and Stress Resistance in Apple and Arabidopsis

The fibrillins are a large family of chloroplast proteins that have been linked with stress tolerance and disease resistance. FIBRILLIN4 (FIB4) is found associated with the photosystem II light-harvesting complex, thylakoids, and plastoglobules, which are chloroplast compartments rich in lipophilic antioxidants. For this study, FIB4 expression was knocked down in apple (Malus 3 domestica) using RNA interference. Plastoglobule osmiophilicity was decreased in fib4 knockdown (fib4 KD) tree chloroplasts compared with the wild type, while total plastoglobule number was unchanged. Compared with the wild type, net photosynthetic CO₂ fixation in fib4 KD trees was decreased at high light intensity but was increased at low light intensity. Furthermore, fib4 KD trees produced more anthocyanins than the wild type when transferred from low to high light intensity, indicating greater sensitivity to high light stress. Relative to the wild type, fib4 KD apples were more sensitive to methyl viologen and had higher superoxide levels during methyl viologen treatment. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) fib4 mutants and fib4 KD apples were more susceptible than their wild-type counterparts to the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato and Erwinia amylovora, respectively, and were more sensitive to ozone-induced tissue damage. Following ozone stress, plastoglobule osmiophilicity decreased in wild-type apple and remained low in fib4 KD trees; total plastoglobule number increased in fib4 KD apples but not in the wild type. These results indicate that FIB4 is required for plastoglobule development and resistance to multiple stresses. This study suggests that FIB4 is involved in regulating plastoglobule content and that defective regulation of plastoglobule content leads to broad stress sensitivity and altered photosynthetic activity.Increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is among the first biochemical responses of plants when challenged by pathogens and harsh environmental conditions (Mehdy, 1994; Lamb and Dixon, 1997; Joo et al., 2005). ROS are implicated in tissue damage during environmental stress and in the promotion of disease development by necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens (Venisse et al., 2001; Apel and Hirt, 2004; Shetty et al., 2008). For example, ROS production is critical for host colonization and pathogenesis by the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, which causes fire blight disease in rosaceous plants such as apple (Malus 3 domestica) and pear (Pyrus communis; Venisse et al., 2001).The chloroplast is a site of ROS production during biotic and abiotic stress (Joo et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2007). The chloroplast has a battery of enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase, and antioxidants such as ascorbate, glutathione, and tocopherols, for protection against ROS (Noctor and Foyer, 1998; Asada, 2006). Plastoglobules are lipoprotein bodies attached to the thylakoids (Austin et al., 2006) that store lipids, including antioxidants such as tocopherols, carotenes, and plastoquinones (Steinmüller and Tevini, 1985; Tevini and Steinmüller, 1985). In addition to antioxidants, plastoglobules contain tocopherol cyclase, which is involved in γ-tocopherol synthesis (Austin et al., 2006; Vidi et al., 2006). The antioxidant content of plastoglobules and their apparent involvement in tocopherol biosynthesis imply that they could play a role in plant responses to oxidative stress.Plastoglobules contain fibrillins, which were initially described as protein components of chromoplast fibrils with a molecular mass of approximately 30 kD (Winkenbach et al., 1976; Knoth et al., 1986; Emter et al., 1990; Deruère et al., 1994). Fibrillins are ubiquitous proteins present from cyanobacteria to plants (Laizet et al., 2004). Fibrillins maintain plastoglobule structural integrity (Deruère et al., 1994; Pozueta-Romero et al., 1997; Langenkämper et al., 2001; Vidi et al., 2006; Bréhélin et al., 2007) and stabilize the photosynthetic apparatus during photooxidative stress (Gillet et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2006; Youssef et al., 2010), osmotic stress (Gillet et al., 1998), drought (Pruvot et al., 1996; Rey et al., 2000), and low temperature (Rorat et al., 2001). Fibrillins are involved in abscisic acid-mediated protection from photoinhibition (Yang et al., 2006), and a subfamily of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) fibrillins (FIB1a, -1b, and -2) conditions jasmonate production during low-temperature, photooxidative stress (Youssef et al., 2010). Arabidopsis plants lacking one fibrillin (At4g22240) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants with suppressed expression of a fibrillin (LeCHRC) are susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae and Botrytis cinerea, respectively (Cooper et al., 2003; Leitner-Dagan et al., 2006), indicating that fibrillins play a role in disease resistance.The Arabidopsis fibrillin encoded by At3g23400 has received various appellations, including FIBRILLIN4 (FIB4; Laizet et al., 2004), Harpin-Binding Protein1 (Song et al., 2002), AtPGL 30.4 (Vidi et al., 2006), and Fibrillin6 (Galetskiy et al., 2008); here, it will be referred to by its earliest published name, FIB4. FIB4 is found associated with the PSII light-harvesting complex (Galetskiy et al., 2008). FIB4 has also been detected in plastoglobules (Vidi et al., 2006; Ytterberg et al., 2006) and thylakoids (Friso et al., 2004; Peltier et al., 2004). However, the specific function of FIB4 is unknown. Several lines of evidence suggest that FIB4 may be involved in plant disease resistance responses: pathogen-associated molecular patterns trigger its phosphorylation (Jones et al., 2006); pathogen-associated molecular patterns stimulate the expression of its ortholog in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; Jones et al., 2006; Sanabria and Dubery, 2006); and it can physically interact with the HrpN (harpin) virulence protein of the fire blight pathogen E. amylovora in a yeast two-hybrid assay, suggesting that it could be a receptor or target of HrpN (Song et al., 2002). In addition, it is thought that FIB4 may be involved in the transport of small, hydrophobic molecules because it contains a conserved lipocalin signature (Jones et al., 2006). Here, we report a genetic analysis of FIB4 function in apple and Arabidopsis in terms of its role in plastoglobule development and plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses.     

Control of Cell Survival and Proliferation by Mammalian Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4B

Translation initiation plays an important role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The translation initiation factor eIF4B (eukaryotic initiation factor 4B) stimulates the RNA helicase activity of eIF4A in unwinding secondary structures in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA in vitro. Here, we studied the effects of eIF4B depletion in cells using RNA interference (RNAi). In agreement with the role of eIF4B in translation initiation, its depletion resulted in inhibition of this step. Selective reduction of translation was observed for mRNAs harboring strong to moderate secondary structures in their 5′UTRs. These mRNAs encode proteins, which function in cell proliferation (Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC [ornithine decarboxylase]) and survival (Bcl-2 and XIAP [X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis]). Furthermore, eIF4B silencing led to decreased proliferation rates, promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis, and further sensitized cells to camptothecin-induced cell death. These results demonstrate that eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival by regulating the translation of proliferative and prosurvival mRNAs.Targeting the translation initiation pathway is emerging as a potential therapy for inhibiting cancer cell growth (35, 38). Ribosome recruitment to the 5′ ends of eukaryotic mRNAs proceeds via translation initiation mechanisms that are dependent either on the 5′ cap structure (m⁷GpppN, where N is any nucleotide) or an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). The majority of translation initiation events in eukaryotes are mediated through cap-dependent translation whereby the 40S ribosomal subunit is recruited to the vicinity of the mRNA 5′ cap structure by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) complex. eIF4F is comprised of eIF4E (the cap-binding subunit), eIF4A (an RNA helicase), and eIF4G (a large scaffolding protein for eIF4E, eIF4A, and other initiation factors). Once assembled at the 5′ cap, the 40S ribosomal subunit in association with several initiation factors scans the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA until it encounters a start codon in a favorable context, followed by polypeptide synthesis (37).Early in vitro studies have shown that the initiation factor eIF4B acts to potentiate ribosome recruitment to the mRNA (3, 45). eIF4B stimulates translation of both capped and uncapped mRNAs in vitro (1, 36). This function is exerted through stimulation of the helicase activity of eIF4A (43), possibly through direct interactions with eIF4A (44) or with mRNA, the ribosome-associated eIF3, and 18S rRNA (28, 29, 44). Thus, eIF4B is thought to form auxiliary bridges between the mRNA and the 40S ribosomal subunit. Toeprinting studies using mammalian eIF4B underscored its importance in the assembly of the 48S initiation complex, especially on mRNAs harboring secondary structures in the 5′UTRs (11).In vivo studies of eIF4B are limited. Ectopic expression of eIF4B in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells and in developing eye imaginal discs stimulated cell proliferation (16). Enhanced cell proliferation is most likely mediated by increased translation of a subset of mRNAs, since knockdown of Drosophila eIF4B by RNA interference (RNAi) caused a modest reduction in global translation but compromised the survival of insect cells grown under low serum conditions (16). Studies of eIF4B in mammalian cells yielded contradictory results. Transient overexpression of eIF4B stimulated translation initiation in a phosphorylation-dependent manner in some cells (18, 49) while inhibiting translation in others (30, 31, 41). These differences might be attributed to disparate levels of eIF4B overexpression.To address the physiological role of eIF4B in mRNA translation in the cell, RNAi knockdown of eIF4B was used here. We demonstrate that eIF4B is required for optimal translation. Importantly, the translation of mRNAs bearing structured 5′UTRs, such as the cell cycle regulators Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC (ornithine decarboxylase), and the antiapoptotic factors Bcl-2 and XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis), was reduced as a result of eIF4B silencing by RNAi. Furthermore, eIF4B silencing promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis. Thus, we show that mammalian eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival, whereby it acts by regulating the translation of a functionally related subset of mRNAs.     

Exocyst SEC3 and Phosphoinositides Define Sites of Exocytosis in Pollen Tube Initiation and Growth

Polarized exocytosis is critical for pollen tube growth, but its localization and function are still under debate. The exocyst vesicle-tethering complex functions in polarized exocytosis. Here, we show that a sec3a exocyst subunit null mutant cannot be transmitted through the male gametophyte due to a defect in pollen tube growth. The green fluorescent protein (GFP)-SEC3a fusion protein is functional and accumulates at or proximal to the pollen tube tip plasma membrane. Partial complementation of sec3a resulted in the development of pollen with multiple tips, indicating that SEC3 is required to determine the site of pollen germination pore formation. Time-lapse imaging demonstrated that SEC3a and SEC8 were highly dynamic and that SEC3a localization on the apical plasma membrane predicts the direction of growth. At the tip, polar SEC3a domains coincided with cell wall deposition. Labeling of GFP-SEC3a-expressing pollen with the endocytic marker FM4-64 revealed the presence of subdomains on the apical membrane characterized by extensive exocytosis. In steady-state growing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen tubes, SEC3a displayed amino-terminal Pleckstrin homology-like domain (SEC3a-N)-dependent subapical membrane localization. In agreement, SEC3a-N interacted with phosphoinositides in vitro and colocalized with a phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) marker in pollen tubes. Correspondingly, molecular dynamics simulations indicated that SEC3a-N associates with the membrane by interacting with PIP₂. However, the interaction with PIP₂ is not required for polar localization and the function of SEC3a in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Taken together, our findings indicate that SEC3a is a critical determinant of polar exocytosis during tip growth and suggest differential regulation of the exocytotic machinery depending on pollen tube growth modes.Pollen tube growth provides a unique model system for studying the role of exocytosis in cell morphogenesis. Pollen tubes are characterized by a highly rapid polarized unidirectional tip growth. Given the relative simplicity of their structure, fast growth rates, haploid genome content, and ability to grow under in vitro culture conditions, pollen tubes provide an extremely attractive system for studying cell morphogenesis. Furthermore, the growth characteristics of pollen tubes resemble those of root hairs, moss protonema, and fungal hyphae and to some extent can be paralleled to neurite growth (Chebli and Geitmann, 2007; Cheung and Wu, 2008; Guan et al., 2013; Hepler and Winship, 2015).It is well established that oscillating polarized exocytosis is fundamental for pollen tube development and determines growth rate (Bove et al., 2008; McKenna et al., 2009; Chebli et al., 2013). Exocytosis is required for the delivery of membrane and cell wall components to the growing tip. Yet, the exact location where exocytosis takes place is under debate. Ultrastructural studies showing the accumulation of vesicles at the tip suggested that exocytosis takes place at the tip (Lancelle et al., 1987; Lancelle and Hepler, 1992; Derksen et al., 1995), which was further supported by studies on the dynamics of cell wall thickness (Rojas et al., 2011), secretion of pectin methyl esterase (PME) and PME inhibitor, and staining of pectin by propidium iodide (PI; Röckel et al., 2008; Rounds et al., 2014). Conversely, based on colabeling with FM1-43 and FM4-64, it was concluded that exocytosis takes place in a subapical collar located in the transition zone between the tip and the shank, as well as at the shank, but not at the tip (Bove et al., 2008; Zonia and Munnik, 2008). In agreement, the pollen tube-specific syntaxin GFP-SYP124 was observed in the inverted cone, 10 to 25 μm away from the tip (Silva et al., 2010), and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments with FM dyes also have indicated that exocytosis takes place at the subapical region (Bove et al., 2008; Moscatelli et al., 2012; Idilli et al., 2013). Yet, based on pollen tube reorientation experiments in a microfluidics device, it was concluded that growth takes place at the tip rather than at a subapical collar located in the transition zone between the apex and the shank (Sanati Nezhad et al., 2014). The tip-based growth is in agreement with exocytosis taking place at the tip. Presumably, part of the disagreement regarding the site of exocytosis resulted from the lack of intracellular markers for exocytosis (Cheung and Wu, 2008; Hepler and Winship, 2015), and as a result, the relationship between the FM dye-labeled inverted cone and exocytotic events during pollen tube growth is not fully understood.In many cell types, the process of secretory vesicles tethering and docking prior to fusion with the plasma membrane is initially mediated by an evolutionarily conserved tethering complex known as the exocyst. The exocyst is a heterooligomeric protein complex composed of eight subunits, SEC3, SEC5, SEC6, SEC8, SEC10, SEC15, EXO70, and EXO84 (TerBush et al., 1996; Guo et al., 1999). Studies originally based on budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) have shown that the exocyst functions as an effector of Rab and Rho small GTPases that specifies the sites of vesicle docking and fusion at the plasma membrane in both space and time (Guo et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2001). Support for the function of the exocyst in vesicle tethering was demonstrated recently by ectopic Sec3p-dependent vesicle recruitment to the mitochondria (Luo et al., 2014).Land plants contain all subunits of the exocyst complex, which were shown to form the functional complex (Elias et al., 2003; Cole et al., 2005; Synek et al., 2006; Hála et al., 2008). Studies in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and maize (Zea mays) have implicated the exocyst in the regulation of pollen tube and root hair growth, seed coat deposition, response to pathogens, cytokinesis, and meristem and stigma function (Cole et al., 2005; Synek et al., 2006; Hála et al., 2008; Fendrych et al., 2010; Kulich et al., 2010; Pecenková et al., 2011; Safavian and Goring, 2013; Wu et al., 2013; Safavian et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016). The growth arrest of pollen tubes in sec8, sec6, sec15a, and sec5a/sec5b single and double mutants (Cole et al., 2005; Hála et al., 2008) or following treatment with the EXO70 inhibitor ENDOSIDIN2 (Zhang et al., 2016), and of root hairs in maize root hairless1 (rth1) SEC3 mutant (Wen et al., 2005), the inhibition of seed coat deposition in the sec8 and exo70A1 mutants (Kulich et al., 2010), and stigmatic papillae function in exo70A1 mutant plants (Safavian and Goring, 2013; Safavian et al., 2015) have implicated the exocyst in polarized exocytosis in plants. Given their function, it was likely that exocyst subunits could be used as markers for polarized exocytosis. Furthermore, it could also be hypothesized that, by studying the mechanisms that underlie the association of the exocyst complex with the plasma membrane, it should be possible to identify mechanisms underlying the regulation of polarized exocytosis (Guan et al., 2013). Moreover, since the interaction of exocytotic vesicles with the exocyst is transient and marks the site(s) of active exocytosis in the membrane, fluorescently labeled exocyst subunits could be used as markers for exocytosis while avoiding potential imaging artifacts stemming from pollen tube tips densely populated with vesicles.We have shown previously that the ROP effector ICR1 can interact with SEC3a and that ROPs can recruit SEC3a-ICR1 complexes to the plasma membrane (Lavy et al., 2007). However, ICR1 is not expressed in pollen tubes, suggesting that SEC3a membrane binding in these cells is likely dependent on other factors. In yeast, the interaction of Sec3p and Exo70p subunits with the plasma membrane is critical for exocyst function (He and Guo, 2009). It has been shown that the membrane binding of both Sec3p and Exo70p is facilitated by their interaction with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂; He et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2008). The yeast Exo70p interacts with PIP₂ via a number of positively charged residues distributed along the protein, with the highest number located at the C-terminal end (Pleskot et al., 2015). It has been suggested that yeast Sec3p interacts with PIP₂ through N-terminal basic residues (Zhang et al., 2008). These data were further corroborated by x-ray crystallography studies, which showed that the yeast Sec3p N-terminal region forms a Pleckstrin homology (PH) domain fold (Baek et al., 2010; Yamashita et al., 2010), a PIP₂ interaction motif (Lemmon, 2008).The localization of the exocyst subunits has been addressed in several studies. In Arabidopsis root hairs and root epidermis cells, SEC3a-GFP was observed in puncta distributed throughout the cell (Zhang et al., 2013). Studies on the Arabidopsis EXO70 subunits EXO70E2, EXO70A1, and EXO70B1 revealed them to be localized in distinct compartments that were termed exocyst-positive organelles (Wang et al., 2010). The exocyst-positive organelles, visualized mostly by ectopic expression, were shown to be cytoplasmic double membrane organelles that can fuse with the plasma membrane and secrete their contents to the apoplast in an exosome-like manner. It is not yet known whether other exocyst subunits also are localized to the same organelles and what might be the biological function of this putative compartment (Wang et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2015). In differentiating xylem cells, two coiled-coil proteins termed VESICLE TETHERING1 and VESICLE TETHERING2 recruit EXO70A1-positive puncta to microtubules via the GOLGI COMPLEX2 protein (Oda et al., 2015). Importantly, the functionality of the XFP fusion proteins used for the localization studies described above was not tested, and in most cases, the fusion proteins were overexpressed. Therefore, the functional localization of the exocyst is still unclear.Here, we studied the function and subcellular localization of the Arabidopsis exocyst SEC3a subunit using a combination of genetics, cell biology, biochemistry, and structural modeling approaches. Our results show that SEC3a is essential for the determination of pollen tube tip germination site and growth. Partial complementation of sec3a resulted in the formation of pollen with multiple pollen tube tips. In Arabidopsis growing pollen tubes, SEC3a localization is dynamic, and it accumulates in domains of polarized secretion, at or close to the tip plasma membrane (PM). Labeling of GFP-SEC3-expressing pollen with FM4-64 revealed the spatial correlation between polarized exocytosis and endocytic recycling. Furthermore, the association of SEC3a with PM at the tip marks the direction of tube elongation and positively correlates with the deposition of PI-labeled pectins and specific anti-esterified pectin antibodies in the cell wall. In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), the mechanisms underlying SEC3a interaction with the PM and its subcellular distribution depend on pollen tube growth mode and involve the interaction with PIP2 through the N-terminal PH domain. Collectively, our results highlight the function of SEC3a as a polarity determinant that links between polarized exocytosis and cell morphogenesis. The correlation between exocyst function and distribution in pollen tubes provides an explanation for some of the current discrepancies regarding the localization of exocytosis.