Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Helices Is Modulated by the Surrounding Protein Backbone

Membrane curvature is involved in numerous biological pathways like vesicle trafficking, endocytosis or nuclear pore complex assembly. In addition to its topological role, membrane curvature is sensed by specific proteins, enabling the coordination of biological processes in space and time. Amongst membrane curvature sensors are the ALPS (Amphipathic Lipid Packing Sensors). ALPS motifs are short peptides with peculiar amphipathic properties. They are found in proteins targeted to distinct curved membranes, mostly in the early secretory pathway. For instance, the ALPS motif of the golgin GMAP210 binds trafficking vesicles, while the ALPS motif of Nup133 targets nuclear pores. It is not clear if, besides curvature sensitivity, ALPS motifs also provide target specificity, or if other domains in the surrounding protein backbone are involved. To elucidate this aspect, we studied the subcellular localization of ALPS motifs outside their natural protein context. The ALPS motifs of GMAP210 or Nup133 were grafted on artificial fluorescent probes. Importantly, ALPS motifs are held in different positions and these contrasting architectures were mimicked by the fluorescent probes. The resulting chimeras recapitulated the original proteins localization, indicating that ALPS motifs are sufficient to specifically localize proteins. Modulating the electrostatic or hydrophobic content of Nup133 ALPS motif modified its avidity for cellular membranes but did not change its organelle targeting properties. In contrast, the structure of the backbone surrounding the helix strongly influenced targeting. In particular, introducing an artificial coiled-coil between ALPS and the fluorescent protein increased membrane curvature sensitivity. This coiled-coil domain also provided membrane curvature sensitivity to the amphipathic helix of Sar1. The degree of curvature sensitivity within the coiled-coil context remains correlated to the natural curvature sensitivity of the helices. This suggests that the chemistry of ALPS motifs is a key parameter for membrane curvature sensitivity, which can be further modulated by the surrounding protein backbone.     

α-Synuclein and ALPS motifs are membrane curvature sensors whose contrasting chemistry mediates selective vesicle binding

Membrane curvature sensors have diverse structures and chemistries, suggesting that they might have the intrinsic capacity to discriminate between different types of vesicles in cells. In this paper, we compare the in vitro and in vivo membrane-binding properties of two curvature sensors that form very different amphipathic helices: the amphipathic lipid-packing sensor (ALPS) motif of a Golgi vesicle tether and the synaptic vesicle protein α-synuclein, a causative agent of Parkinson's disease. We demonstrate the mechanism by which α-synuclein senses membrane curvature. Unlike ALPS motifs, α-synuclein has a poorly developed hydrophobic face, and this feature explains its dual sensitivity to negatively charged lipids and to membrane curvature. When expressed in yeast cells, these two curvature sensors were targeted to different classes of vesicles, those of the early secretory pathway for ALPS motifs and to negatively charged endocytic/post-Golgi vesicles in the case of α-synuclein. Through structures with complementary chemistries, α-synuclein and ALPS motifs target distinct vesicles in cells by direct interaction with different lipid environments.     

Measuring protein insertion areas in lipid monolayers by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

Membrane insertion of protein domains is an important step in many membrane remodeling processes, for example, in vesicular transport. The membrane area taken up by the protein insertion influences the protein binding affinity as well as the mechanical stress induced in the membrane and thereby its curvature. To our knowledge, this is the first optical measurement of this quantity on a system in equilibrium with direct determination of the number of inserted protein and no further assumptions concerning the binding thermodynamics. Whereas macroscopic total area changes in lipid monolayers are typically measured on a Langmuir film balance, finding the number of inserted proteins without perturbing the system and quantitating any small area changes has posed a challenge. Here, we address both issues by performing two-color fluorescence correlation spectroscopy directly on the monolayer. With a fraction of the protein being fluorescently labeled, the number of inserted proteins is determined in situ without resorting to invasive techniques such as collecting the monolayer by aspiration. The second color channel is exploited to monitor a small fraction of labeled lipids to determine the total area increase. Here, we use this method to determine the insertion area per molecule of Sar1, a protein of the COPII complex, which is involved in transport vesicle formation. Sar1 has an N-terminal amphipathic helix, which is responsible for membrane binding and curvature generation. An insertion area of (3.4 ± 0.8) nm² was obtained for Sar1 in monolayers from a lipid mixture typically used in COPII reconstitution experiments, in good agreement with the expected insertion area of the Sar1 amphipathic helix. By using the two-color approach, determining insertion areas relies only on local fluorescence measurements. No macroscopic area measurements are needed, giving the method the potential to also be applied to laterally heterogeneous monolayers and bilayers.     

Mechanism of endophilin N-BAR domain-mediated membrane curvature

Endophilin-A1 is a BAR domain-containing protein enriched at synapses and is implicated in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. It binds to dynamin and synaptojanin via a C-terminal SH3 domain. We examine the mechanism by which the BAR domain and an N-terminal amphipathic helix, which folds upon membrane binding, work as a functional unit (the N-BAR domain) to promote dimerisation and membrane curvature generation. By electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, we show that this amphipathic helix is peripherally bound in the plane of the membrane, with the midpoint of insertion aligned with the phosphate level of headgroups. This places the helix in an optimal position to effect membrane curvature generation. We solved the crystal structure of rat endophilin-A1 BAR domain and examined a distinctive insert protruding from the membrane interaction face. This insert is predicted to form an additional amphipathic helix and is important for curvature generation. Its presence defines an endophilin/nadrin subclass of BAR domains. We propose that N-BAR domains function as low-affinity dimers regulating binding partner recruitment to areas of high membrane curvature.     

Amphipathic motifs in BAR domains are essential for membrane curvature sensing

BAR (Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs) domains and amphipathic α‐helices (AHs) are believed to be sensors of membrane curvature thus facilitating the assembly of protein complexes on curved membranes. Here, we used quantitative fluorescence microscopy to compare the binding of both motifs on single nanosized liposomes of different diameters and therefore membrane curvature. Characterization of members of the three BAR domain families showed surprisingly that the crescent‐shaped BAR dimer with its positively charged concave face is not able to sense membrane curvature. Mutagenesis on BAR domains showed that membrane curvature sensing critically depends on the N‐terminal AH and furthermore that BAR domains sense membrane curvature through hydrophobic insertion in lipid packing defects and not through electrostatics. Consequently, amphipathic motifs, such as AHs, that are often associated with BAR domains emerge as an important means for a protein to sense membrane curvature. Measurements on single liposomes allowed us to document heterogeneous binding behaviour within the ensemble and quantify the influence of liposome polydispersity on bulk membrane curvature sensing experiments. The latter results suggest that bulk liposome‐binding experiments should be interpreted with great caution.     

Membrane fission is promoted by insertion of amphipathic helices and is restricted by crescent BAR domains

Shallow hydrophobic insertions and crescent-shaped BAR scaffolds promote membrane curvature. Here, we investigate membrane fission by shallow hydrophobic insertions quantitatively and mechanistically. We provide evidence that membrane insertion of the ENTH domain of epsin leads to liposome vesiculation, and that epsin is required for clathrin-coated vesicle budding in cells. We also show that BAR-domain scaffolds from endophilin, amphiphysin, GRAF, and β2-centaurin limit membrane fission driven by hydrophobic insertions. A quantitative assay for vesiculation reveals an antagonistic relationship between amphipathic helices and scaffolds of N-BAR domains in fission. The extent of vesiculation by these proteins and vesicle size depend on the number and length of amphipathic helices per BAR domain, in accord with theoretical considerations. This fission mechanism gives a new framework for understanding membrane scission in the absence of mechanoenzymes such as dynamin and suggests how Arf and Sar proteins work in vesicle scission.     

Regulation of Membrane-Shape Transitions Induced by I-BAR Domains

I-BAR proteins are well-known actin-cytoskeleton adaptors and have been observed to be involved in the formation of plasma membrane protrusions (filopodia). I-BAR proteins contain an all-helical, crescent-shaped IRSp53-MIM domain (IMD) dimer that is believed to be able to couple with a membrane shape. This coupling could involve the sensing and even the generation of negative plasma membrane curvature. Indeed, the in vitro studies have shown that IMDs can induce inward tubulation of liposomes. While N-BAR domains, which generate positive membrane curvature, have received a considerable amount of attention from both theory and experiments, the mechanisms of curvature coupling through IMDs are comparatively less studied and understood. Here we used a membrane-shape stability assay developed recently in our lab to quantitatively characterize IMD-induced membrane-shape transitions. We determined a membrane-shape stability diagram for IMDs that reveals how membrane tension and protein density can comodulate the generation of IMD-induced membrane protrusions. From comparison to analytical theory, we determine three key parameters that characterize the curvature coupling of IMD. We find that the curvature generation capacity of IMDs is significantly stronger compared to that of endophilin, an N-BAR protein known to be involved in plasma membrane shape transitions. Contrary to N-BAR domains, where amphipathic helix insertion is known to promote its membrane curvature generation, for IMDs we find that amphipathic helices inhibit membrane shape transitions, consistent with the inverse curvature that IMDs generate. Importantly, in both of these types of BAR domains, electrostatic interactions affect membrane-binding capacity, but do not appear to affect the curvature generation capacity of the protein. These two types of BAR domain proteins show qualitatively similar membrane shape stability diagrams, suggesting an underlying ubiquitous mechanism by which peripheral proteins regulate membrane curvature.     

Two lipid-packing sensor motifs contribute to the sensitivity of ArfGAP1 to membrane curvature

ArfGAP1 (Arf GTPase activating protein 1) controls the cycling of the COPI coat on Golgi membranes by catalyzing GTP hydrolysis in the small G protein Arf1. ArfGAP1 contains a central motif named ALPS (ArfGAP1 lipid-packing sensor) that adsorbs preferentially onto highly curved membranes. This motif allows coupling of the rate of GTP hydrolysis in Arf1 with membrane curvature induced by the COPI coat. Upon membrane adsorption, the ALPS motif folds into an amphipathic alpha-helix. This helix contrasts from a classical membrane-adsorbing helix in the abundance of S and T residues and the paucity of charged residues in its polar face. We show here that ArfGAP1 contains a second motif with similar physicochemical properties. This motif, ALPS2, also forms an amphipathic alpha-helix at the surface of small vesicles and contributes to the Golgi localization of ArfGAP1 in vivo. Using several quantitative assays, we determined the relative contribution of the two ALPS motifs in the recognition of liposomes of defined curvature and composition. Our results show that ALPS1 is the primary determinant of the interaction of ArfGAP1 with lipid membranes and that ALPS2 reinforces this interaction 40-fold. Furthermore, our results suggest that depending on the engagement of one or two functional ALPS motifs, ArfGAP1 can respond to a wide range of membrane curvature and can adapt to lipid membranes of various acyl chain compositions.     

The HOPS/Class C Vps Complex Tethers High‐Curvature Membranes via a Direct Protein–Membrane Interaction

Membrane tethering is a physical association of two membranes before their fusion. Many membrane tethering factors have been identified, but the interactions that mediate inter‐membrane associations remain largely a matter of conjecture. Previously, we reported that the homotypic fusion and protein sorting/Class C vacuolar protein sorting (HOPS/Class C Vps) complex, which has two binding sites for the yeast vacuolar Rab GTPase Ypt7p, can tether two low‐curvature liposomes when both membranes bear Ypt7p. Here, we show that HOPS tethers highly curved liposomes to Ypt7p‐bearing low‐curvature liposomes even when the high‐curvature liposomes are protein‐free. Phosphorylation of the curvature‐sensing amphipathic lipid‐packing sensor (ALPS) motif from the Vps41p HOPS subunit abrogates tethering of high‐curvature liposomes. A HOPS complex without its Vps39p subunit, which contains one of the Ypt7p binding sites in HOPS, lacks tethering activity, though it binds high‐curvature liposomes and Ypt7p‐bearing low‐curvature liposomes. Thus, HOPS tethers highly curved membranes via a direct protein–membrane interaction. Such high‐curvature membranes are found at the sites of vacuole tethering and fusion. There, vacuole membranes bend sharply, generating large areas of vacuole‐vacuole contact. We propose that HOPS localizes via the Vps41p ALPS motif to these high‐curvature regions. There, HOPS binds via Vps39p to Ypt7p in an apposed vacuole membrane.      

BAR domains, amphipathic helices and membrane-anchored proteins use the same mechanism to sense membrane curvature

The internal membranes of eukaryotic cells are all twists and bends characterized by high curvature. During recent years it has become clear that specific proteins sustain these curvatures while others simply recognize membrane shape and use it as “molecular information” to organize cellular processes in space and time. Here we discuss this new important recognition process termed membrane curvature sensing (MCS). First, we review a new fluorescence-based experimental method that allows characterization of MCS using measurements on single vesicles and compare it to sensing assays that use bulk/ensemble liposome samples of different mean diameter. Next, we describe two different MCS protein motifs (amphipathic helices and BAR domains) and suggest that in both cases curvature sensitive membrane binding results from asymmetric insertion of hydrophobic amino acids in the lipid membrane. This mechanism can be extended to include the insertion of alkyl chain in the lipid membrane and consequently palmitoylated and myristoylated proteins are predicted to display similar curvature sensitive binding. Surprisingly, in all the aforementioned cases, MCS is predominantly mediated by a higher density of binding sites on curved membranes instead of higher affinity as assumed so far. Finally, we integrate these new insights into the debate about which motifs are involved in sensing versus induction of membrane curvature and what role MCS proteins may play in biology.     

The hydrophobic insertion mechanism of membrane curvature generation by proteins

A wide spectrum of intracellular processes is dependent on the ability of cells to dynamically regulate membrane shape. Membrane bending by proteins is necessary for the generation of intracellular transport carriers and for the maintenance of otherwise intrinsically unstable regions of high membrane curvature in cell organelles. Understanding the mechanisms by which proteins curve membranes is therefore of primary importance. Here we suggest, for the first time to our knowledge, a quantitative mechanism of lipid membrane bending by hydrophobic or amphipathic rodlike inclusions which simulate amphipathic α-helices—structures shown to sculpt membranes. Considering the lipid monolayer matrix as an anisotropic elastic material, we compute the intramembrane stresses and strains generated by the embedded inclusions, determine the resulting membrane shapes, and the accumulated elastic energy. We characterize the ability of an inclusion to bend membranes by an effective spontaneous curvature, and show that shallow rodlike inclusions are more effective in membrane shaping than are lipids having a high propensity for curvature. Our computations provide experimentally testable predictions on the protein amounts needed to generate intracellular membrane shapes for various insertion depths and membrane thicknesses. We also predict that the ability of N-BAR domains to produce membrane tubules in vivo can be ascribed solely to insertion of their amphipathic helices.     

Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Helices: Insights from Implicit Membrane Modeling

Sensing and generation of lipid membrane curvature, mediated by the binding of specific proteins onto the membrane surface, play crucial roles in cell biology. A number of mechanisms have been proposed, but the molecular understanding of these processes is incomplete. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations have offered valuable insights but are extremely demanding computationally. Implicit membrane simulations could provide a viable alternative, but current models apply only to planar membranes. In this work, the implicit membrane model 1 is extended to spherical and tubular membranes. The geometric change from planar to curved shapes is straightforward but insufficient for capturing the full curvature effect, which includes changes in lipid packing. Here, these packing effects are taken into account via the lateral pressure profile. The extended implicit membrane model 1 is tested on the wild-types and mutants of the antimicrobial peptide magainin, the ALPS motif of arfgap1, α-synuclein, and an ENTH domain. In these systems, the model is in qualitative agreement with experiments. We confirm that favorable electrostatic interactions tend to weaken curvature sensitivity in the presence of strong hydrophobic interactions but may actually have a positive effect when those are weak. We also find that binding to vesicles is more favorable than binding to tubes of the same diameter and that the long helix of α-synuclein tends to orient along the axis of tubes, whereas shorter helices tend to orient perpendicular to it. Adoption of a specific orientation could provide a mechanism for coupling protein oligomerization to tubule formation.     

Adeno-associated virus type 2 VP2 capsid protein is nonessential and can tolerate large peptide insertions at its N terminus

Direct insertion of amino acid sequences into the adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) capsid open reading frame (cap ORF) is one strategy currently being developed for retargeting this prototypical gene therapy vector. While this approach has successfully resulted in the formation of AAV particles that have expanded or retargeted viral tropism, the inserted sequences have been relatively short, linear receptor binding ligands. Since many receptor-ligand interactions involve nonlinear, conformation-dependent binding domains, we investigated the insertion of full-length peptides into the AAV cap ORF. To minimize disruption of critical VP3 structural domains, we confined the insertions to residue 138 within the VP1-VP2 overlap, which has been shown to be on the surface of the particle following insertion of smaller epitopes. The insertion of coding sequences for the 8-kDa chemokine binding domain of rat fractalkine (CX3CL1), the 18-kDa human hormone leptin, and the 30-kDa green fluorescent protein (GFP) after residue 138 failed to lead to formation of particles due to the loss of VP3 expression. To test the ability to complement these insertions with the missing capsid proteins in trans, we designed a system for producing AAV vectors in which expression of one capsid protein is isolated and combined with the remaining two capsid proteins expressed separately. Such an approach allows for genetic modification of a specific capsid protein across its entire coding sequence leaving the remaining capsid proteins unaffected. An examination of particle formation from the individual components of the system revealed that genome-containing particles formed as long as the VP3 capsid protein was present and demonstrated that the VP2 capsid protein is nonessential for viral infectivity. Viable particles composed of all three capsid proteins were obtained from the capsid complementation groups regardless of which capsid proteins were supplied separately in trans. Significant overexpression of VP2 resulted in the formation of particles with altered capsid protein stoichiometry. The key finding was that by using this system we successfully obtained nearly wild-type levels of recombinant AAV-like particles with large ligands inserted after residue 138 in VP1 and VP2 or in VP2 exclusively. While insertions at residue 138 in VP1 significantly decreased infectivity, insertions at residue 138 that were exclusively in VP2 had a minimal effect on viral assembly or infectivity. Finally, insertion of GFP into VP1 and VP2 resulted in a particle whose trafficking could be temporally monitored by using confocal microscopy. Thus, we have demonstrated a method that can be used to insert large (up to 30-kDa) peptide ligands into the AAV particle. This system allows greater flexibility than current approaches in genetically manipulating the composition of the AAV particle and, in particular, may allow vector retargeting to alternative receptors requiring interaction with full-length conformation-dependent peptide ligands.     

ArfGAP1 responds to membrane curvature through the folding of a lipid packing sensor motif

ArfGAP1 promotes GTP hydrolysis in Arf1, a small G protein that interacts with lipid membranes and drives the assembly of the COPI coat in a GTP-dependent manner. The activity of ArfGAP1 increases with membrane curvature, suggesting a negative feedback loop in which COPI-induced membrane deformation determines the timing and location of GTP hydrolysis within a coated bud. Here we show that a central sequence of about 40 amino acids in ArfGAP1 acts as a lipid-packing sensor. This ALPS motif (ArfGAP1 Lipid Packing Sensor) is also found in the yeast homologue Gcs1p and is necessary for coupling ArfGAP1 activity with membrane curvature. The ALPS motif binds avidly to small liposomes and shows the same hypersensitivity on liposome radius as full-length ArfGAP1. Site-directed mutagenesis, limited proteolysis and circular dichroism experiments suggest that the ALPS motif, which is unstructured in solution, inserts bulky hydrophobic residues between loosely packed lipids and forms an amphipathic helix on highly curved membranes. This helix differs from classical amphipathic helices by the abundance of serine and threonine residues on its polar face.     

Membrane bending by protein-protein crowding

Curved membranes are an essential feature of dynamic cellular structures, including endocytic pits, filopodia protrusions and most organelles. It has been proposed that specialized proteins induce curvature by binding to membranes through two primary mechanisms: membrane scaffolding by curved proteins or complexes; and insertion of wedge-like amphipathic helices into the membrane. Recent computational studies have raised questions about the efficiency of the helix-insertion mechanism, predicting that proteins must cover nearly 100% of the membrane surface to generate high curvature, an improbable physiological situation. Thus, at present, we lack a sufficient physical explanation of how protein attachment bends membranes efficiently. On the basis of studies of epsin1 and AP180, proteins involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis, we propose a third general mechanism for bending fluid cellular membranes: protein-protein crowding. By correlating membrane tubulation with measurements of protein densities on membrane surfaces, we demonstrate that lateral pressure generated by collisions between bound proteins drives bending. Whether proteins attach by inserting a helix or by binding lipid heads with an engineered tag, protein coverage above ~20% is sufficient to bend membranes. Consistent with this crowding mechanism, we find that even proteins unrelated to membrane curvature, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP), can bend membranes when sufficiently concentrated. These findings demonstrate a highly efficient mechanism by which the crowded protein environment on the surface of cellular membranes can contribute to membrane shape change.     

Amphipathic-Lipid-Packing-Sensor interactions with lipids assessed by atomistic molecular dynamics

The Amphipathic-Lipid-Packing-Sensor (ALPS) motif targets the protein ArfGAP1 to curved membranes during vesicle formation in the Golgi apparatus. ALPS specifically recognizes lipid packing defects due to the positive curvature of budding vesicles. In this work we assessed the microscopic interactions between ALPS and two phospholipid membranes at different degrees of lipid packing by explicit molecular dynamics (MD). Simulations were performed within loosely packed membranes composed of a mixture of dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC)/dioleoylglycerol (DOG) at a molar ratio 85:15. Some other simulations were performed in pure DOPC for which lipid packing is tighter. We show that the presence of DOG causes packing defects at the phosphate level and thereby modifies some properties of the bilayer. This leads to a higher hydration of the lipid headgroups. When embedded in a membrane with such defects, ALPS displays a higher degree of conformational flexibility than in a more packed membrane. We propose that lipid packing sensing by ALPS may have an entropic origin and that its flexibility is a key feature.     

Reovirus FAST Proteins Drive Pore Formation and Syncytiogenesis Using a Novel Helix-Loop-Helix Fusion-Inducing Lipid Packing Sensor

Pore formation is the most energy-demanding step during virus-induced membrane fusion, where high curvature of the fusion pore rim increases the spacing between lipid headgroups, exposing the hydrophobic interior of the membrane to water. How protein fusogens breach this thermodynamic barrier to pore formation is unclear. We identified a novel fusion-inducing lipid packing sensor (FLiPS) in the cytosolic endodomain of the baboon reovirus p15 fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) protein that is essential for pore formation during cell-cell fusion and syncytiogenesis. NMR spectroscopy and mutational studies indicate the dependence of this FLiPS on a hydrophobic helix-loop-helix structure. Biochemical and biophysical assays reveal the p15 FLiPS preferentially partitions into membranes with high positive curvature, and this partitioning is impeded by bis-ANS, a small molecule that inserts into hydrophobic defects in membranes. Most notably, the p15 FLiPS can be functionally replaced by heterologous amphipathic lipid packing sensors (ALPS) but not by other membrane-interactive amphipathic helices. Furthermore, a previously unrecognized amphipathic helix in the cytosolic domain of the reptilian reovirus p14 FAST protein can functionally replace the p15 FLiPS, and is itself replaceable by a heterologous ALPS motif. Anchored near the cytoplasmic leaflet by the FAST protein transmembrane domain, the FLiPS is perfectly positioned to insert into hydrophobic defects that begin to appear in the highly curved rim of nascent fusion pores, thereby lowering the energy barrier to stable pore formation.     

Membrane Curvature Induction and Tubulation Are Common Features of Synucleins and Apolipoproteins

Synucleins and apolipoproteins have been implicated in a number of membrane and lipid trafficking events. Lipid interaction for both types of proteins is mediated by 11 amino acid repeats that form amphipathic helices. This similarity suggests that synucleins and apolipoproteins might have comparable effects on lipid membranes, but this has not been shown directly. Here, we find that α-synuclein, β-synuclein, and apolipoprotein A-1 have the conserved functional ability to induce membrane curvature and to convert large vesicles into highly curved membrane tubules and vesicles. The resulting structures are morphologically similar to those generated by amphiphysin, a curvature-inducing protein involved in endocytosis. Unlike amphiphysin, however, synucleins and apolipoproteins do not require any scaffolding domains and curvature induction is mediated by the membrane insertion and wedging of amphipathic helices alone. Moreover, we frequently observed that α-synuclein caused membrane structures that had the appearance of nascent budding vesicles. The ability to function as a minimal machinery for vesicle budding agrees well with recent findings that α-synuclein plays a role in vesicle trafficking and enhances endocytosis. Induction of membrane curvature must be under strict regulation in vivo; however, as we find it can also cause disruption of membrane integrity. Because the degree of membrane curvature induction depends on the concerted action of multiple proteins, controlling the local protein density of tubulating proteins may be important. How cellular safeguarding mechanisms prevent such potentially toxic events and whether they go awry in disease remains to be determined.     

Interplay between Membrane Curvature and Cholesterol: Role of Palmitoylated Caveolin-1

Caveolin-1 (cav-1) is an important player in cell signaling and endocytosis that has been shown to colocalize with cholesterol-rich membrane domains. Experimental studies with varying cav-1 constructs have suggested that it can induce both cholesterol clustering and membrane curvature. Here, we probe the molecular origin of membrane curvature and cholesterol clustering by cav-1 by using coarse-grain molecular dynamics simulations. We have performed a series of simulations of a functionally important cav-1 construct, comprising the membrane-interacting domains and a C-terminal palmitoyl tail. Our results suggest that cav-1 is able to induce cholesterol clustering in the membrane leaflet to which it is bound as well as the opposing leaflet. A positive membrane curvature is observed upon cav-1 binding in cholesterol-containing bilayers. Interestingly, we observe an interplay between cholesterol clustering and membrane curvature such that cav-1 is able to induce higher membrane curvature in cholesterol-rich membranes. The role of the cav-1 palmitoyl tail is less clear and appears to increase the membrane contacts. Further, we address the importance of the secondary structure of cav-1 domains and show that it could play an important role in membrane curvature and cholesterol clustering. Our work is an important step toward a molecular picture of caveolae and vesicular endocytosis.     

Membrane reshaping by protein condensates

Proteins can organize into dynamic, functionally important assemblies on fluid membrane surfaces. Phase separation has emerged as an important mechanism for forming such protein assemblies on the membrane during cell signaling, endocytosis, and cytoskeleton regulation. Protein-protein phase separation thus adds novel fluid mosaics to the classical Singer and Nicolson model. Protein condensates formed in this process can modulate membrane morphologies. This is evident from recent reports of protein condensate-driven membrane reshaping in processes such as endocytosis, autophagosome formation, and protein storage vacuole morphogenesis in plants. Lateral phase separation (on the membrane surface) of peripheral curvature coupling proteins can modulate such membrane morphological transitions. Additionally, three-dimensional protein phase separation can result in droplets that through adhesion can affect membrane shape changes. How do these condensate-driven curvature generation mechanisms contrast with the classically recognized scaffolding and amphipathic helix insertion activities of specific membrane remodeling proteins? A salient feature of these condensate-driven membrane activities is that they depend upon both macroscopic features (such as interfacial energies of the condensate, membrane, and cytosol) as well as microscopic, molecular-level interactions (such as protein-lipid binding). This review highlights the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying curvature generation by protein condensates in various biological pathways.