Heterodimeric Capping Protein from Arabidopsis Is a Membrane-Associated,Actin-Binding Protein

The actin cytoskeleton is a major regulator of cell morphogenesis and responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli. The organization and activities of the cytoskeleton are choreographed by hundreds of accessory proteins. Many actin-binding proteins are thought to be stimulus-response regulators that bind to signaling phospholipids and change their activity upon lipid binding. Whether these proteins associate with and/or are regulated by signaling lipids in plant cells remains poorly understood. Heterodimeric capping protein (CP) is a conserved and ubiquitous regulator of actin dynamics. It binds to the barbed end of filaments with high affinity and modulates filament assembly and disassembly reactions in vitro. Direct interaction of CP with phospholipids, including phosphatidic acid, results in uncapping of filament ends in vitro. Live-cell imaging and reverse-genetic analyses of cp mutants in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) recently provided compelling support for a model in which CP activity is negatively regulated by phosphatidic acid in vivo. Here, we used complementary biochemical, subcellular fractionation, and immunofluorescence microscopy approaches to elucidate CP-membrane association. We found that CP is moderately abundant in Arabidopsis tissues and present in a microsomal membrane fraction. Sucrose density gradient separation and immunoblotting with known compartment markers were used to demonstrate that CP is enriched on membrane-bound organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. This association could facilitate cross talk between the actin cytoskeleton and a wide spectrum of essential cellular functions such as organelle motility and signal transduction.The cellular levels of membrane-associated lipids undergo dynamic changes in response to developmental and environmental stimuli. Different species of phospholipids target specific proteins and this often affects the activity and/or subcellular localization of these lipid-binding proteins. One such membrane lipid, phosphatidic acid (PA), serves as a second messenger and regulates multiple developmental processes in plants, including seedling development, root hair growth and pattern formation, pollen tube growth, leaf senescence, and fruit ripening. PA levels also change during various stress responses, including high salinity and dehydration, pathogen attack, and cold tolerance (Testerink and Munnik, 2005, 2011; Wang, 2005; Li et al., 2009). In mammalian cells, PA is critical for vesicle trafficking events, such as vesicle budding from the Golgi apparatus, vesicle transport, exocytosis, endocytosis, and vesicle fusion (Liscovitch et al., 2000; Freyberg et al., 2003; Jenkins and Frohman, 2005).The actin cytoskeleton and a plethora of actin-binding proteins (ABPs) are well-known targets and transducers of lipid signaling (Drøbak et al., 2004; Saarikangas et al., 2010; Pleskot et al., 2013). For example, several ABPs have the ability to bind phosphoinositide lipids, such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P₂]. The severing or actin filament depolymerizing proteins such as villin, cofilin, and profilin are inhibited when bound to PtdIns(4,5)P₂. One ABP appears to be strongly regulated by another phospholipid; human gelsolin binds to lysophosphatidic acid and its filament severing and barbed-end capping activities are inhibited by this biologically active lipid (Meerschaert et al., 1998). Gelsolin is not, however, regulated by PA (Meerschaert et al., 1998), nor are profilin (Lassing and Lindberg, 1985), α-actinin (Fraley et al., 2003), or chicken CapZ (Schafer et al., 1996).The heterodimeric capping protein (CP) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) also binds to and its activity is inhibited by phospholipids, including both PtdIns(4,5)P₂ and PA (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). PA and phospholipase D activity have been implicated in the actin-dependent tip growth of root hairs and pollen tubes (Ohashi et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Samaj et al., 2004; Monteiro et al., 2005a; Pleskot et al., 2010). Exogenous application of PA causes an elevation of actin filament levels in suspension cells, pollen, and Arabidopsis epidermal cells (Lee et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013). Capping protein (CP) binds to the barbed end of actin filaments with high (nanomolar) affinity, dissociates quite slowly, and prevents the addition of actin subunits at this end (Huang et al., 2003, 2006; Kim et al., 2007). In the presence of phospholipids, AtCP is not able to bind to the barbed end of actin filaments (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). Furthermore, capped filament ends are uncapped by the addition of PA, allowing actin assembly from a pool of profilin-actin (Huang et al., 2006). Collectively, these data lead to a simple model whereby CP, working in concert with profilin-actin, serves to maintain tight regulation of actin assembly at filament barbed ends (Huang et al., 2006; Blanchoin et al., 2010; Henty-Ridilla et al., 2013; Pleskot et al., 2013). Furthermore, the availability of CP for filament ends can be modulated by fluxes in signaling lipids. Genetic evidence for this model was recently obtained by analyzing the dynamic behavior of actin filament ends in living Arabidopsis epidermal cells after treatment with exogenous PA (Li et al., 2012). Specifically, changes in the architecture of cortical actin arrays and dynamics of individual actin filaments that are induced by PA treatment were found to be attenuated in cp mutant cells (Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013).Structural characterization of chicken CapZ demonstrates that the α- and β-subunits of the heterodimer form a compact structure resembling a mushroom with pseudo-two-fold rotational symmetry (Yamashita et al., 2003). Actin- and phospholipid-binding sites are conserved on the C-terminal regions, sometimes referred to as tentacles, which comprise amphipathic α-helices (Cooper and Sept, 2008; Pleskot et al., 2012). Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations recently revealed the mechanism of chicken and AtCP association with membranes (Pleskot et al., 2012). AtCP interacts specifically with lipid bilayers through interactions between PA and the amphipathic helix of the α-subunit tentacle. Extensive polar contacts between lipid headgroups and basic residues on CP (including K278, which is unique to plant CP), as well as partial embedding of nonpolar groups into the lipid bilayer, are observed (Pleskot et al., 2012). Moreover, a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing the C-terminal 38 amino acids from capping protein α subunit (CPA) is sufficient to bind PA-containing liposomes in vitro (Pleskot et al., 2012). Collectively, these findings lead us to predict that AtCP will behave like a membrane-associated protein in plant cells.Additional evidence from animal and microbial cells supports the association of CP with biological membranes. In Acanthamoeba castellanii, CP is localized primarily to the hyaline ectoplasm in a region of the cytoplasm just under the plasma membrane that contains a high concentration of actin filaments (Cooper et al., 1984). Localization of CP with regions rich in actin filaments and with membranes was supported by subcellular fractionation experiments, in which CP was associated with a crude membrane fraction that included plasma membrane (Cooper et al., 1984). Further evidence demonstrates that CP localizes to cortical actin patches at sites of new cell wall growth in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), including the site of bud emergence. By contrast, CP did not colocalize with actin cables in S. cerevisiae (Amatruda and Cooper, 1992). CP may localize to these sites by direct interactions with membrane lipids, through binding the ends of actin filaments, or by association with another protein different from actin. In support of this hypothesis, GFP-CP fusion proteins demonstrate that sites of actin assembling in living cells contain both CP and the actin-related protein2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, and CP is located in two types of structures: (1) motile regions of the cell periphery, which reflect movement of the edge of the lamella during extension and ruffling; and (2) dynamic spots within the lamella (Schafer et al., 1998). CP has been colocalized to the F-actin patches in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Kovar et al., 2005), which promotes Arp2/3-dependent nucleation and branching and limits the extent of filament elongation (Akin and Mullins, 2008). These findings lend additional support for a model whereby CP cooperates with the Arp2/3 complex to regulate actin dynamics (Nakano and Mabuchi, 2006). Activities and localization of other plant ABPs are linked to membranes. Membrane association has been linked to the assembly status of the ARP2/3 complex, an actin filament nucleator, in Arabidopsis (Kotchoni et al., 2009). SPIKE1 (SPK1), a Rho of plants (Rop)-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and peripheral membrane protein, maintains the homeostasis of the early secretory pathway and signal integration during morphogenesis through specialized domains in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Zhang et al., 2010). Furthermore, Nck-associated protein1 (NAP1), a component of the suppressor of cAMP receptor/WASP-family verprolin homology protein (SCAR/WAVE) complex, strongly associates with membranes and is particularly enriched in ER membranes (Zhang et al., 2013a). Finally, a superfamily of plant ABPs, called NETWORKED proteins, was recently discovered; these link the actin cytoskeleton to various cellular membranes (Deeks et al., 2012; Hawkins et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014).In this work, we demonstrate that CP is a membrane-associated protein in Arabidopsis. To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence for CP-membrane association in plants. This interaction likely targets CP to cellular compartments such as the ER and Golgi. This unique location may allow CP to remodel the actin cytoskeleton in the vicinity of endomembrane compartments and/or to respond rapidly to fluxes in signaling lipids.     

Polyamine Oxidase5 Regulates Arabidopsis Growth through Thermospermine Oxidase Activity

The major plant polyamines (PAs) are the tetraamines spermine (Spm) and thermospermine (T-Spm), the triamine spermidine, and the diamine putrescine. PA homeostasis is governed by the balance between biosynthesis and catabolism; the latter is catalyzed by polyamine oxidase (PAO). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has five PAO genes, AtPAO1 to AtPAO5, and all encoded proteins have been biochemically characterized. All AtPAO enzymes function in the back-conversion of tetraamine to triamine and/or triamine to diamine, albeit with different PA specificities. Here, we demonstrate that AtPAO5 loss-of-function mutants (pao5) contain 2-fold higher T-Spm levels and exhibit delayed transition from vegetative to reproductive growth compared with that of wild-type plants. Although the wild type and pao5 are indistinguishable at the early seedling stage, externally supplied low-dose T-Spm, but not other PAs, inhibits aerial growth of pao5 mutants in a dose-dependent manner. Introduction of wild-type AtPAO5 into pao5 mutants rescues growth and reduces the T-Spm content, demonstrating that AtPAO5 is a T-Spm oxidase. Recombinant AtPAO5 catalyzes the conversion of T-Spm and Spm to triamine spermidine in vitro. AtPAO5 specificity for T-Spm in planta may be explained by coexpression with T-Spm synthase but not with Spm synthase. The pao5 mutant lacking T-Spm oxidation and the acl5 mutant lacking T-Spm synthesis both exhibit growth defects. This study indicates a crucial role for T-Spm in plant growth and development.Polyamines (PAs) are low-molecular mass aliphatic amines that are present in almost all living organisms. Cellular PA concentrations are governed primarily by the balance between biosynthesis and catabolism. In plants, the major PAs are the diamine putrescine (Put), the triamine spermidine (Spd), and the tetraamines spermine (Spm) and thermospermine (T-Spm; Kusano et al., 2008; Alcázar et al., 2010; Mattoo et al., 2010; Takahashi and Kakehi, 2010; Tiburcio et al., 2014). Put is synthesized from Orn by Orn decarboxylase and/or from Arg by three sequential reactions catalyzed by Arg decarboxylase (ADC), agmatine iminohydrolase, and N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) does not contain an ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE gene (Hanfrey et al., 2001) and synthesizes Put from Arg via the ADC pathway. Put is further converted to Spd via an aminopropyltransferase reaction catalyzed by spermidine synthase (SPDS). In this reaction, an aminopropyl residue is transferred to Put from decarboxylated S-adenosyl-Met, which is synthesized by S-adenosyl-Met decarboxylase (SAMDC; Kusano et al., 2008). Spd is then converted to Spm or T-Spm, reactions catalyzed in Arabidopsis by spermine synthase (SPMS; encoded by SPMS) or thermospermine synthase (encoded by Acaulis5 [ACL5]), respectively (Hanzawa et al., 2000; Knott et al., 2007; Kakehi et al., 2008; Naka et al., 2010). A recent review reports that T-Spm is ubiquitously present in the plant kingdom (Takano et al., 2012).The PA catabolic pathway has been extensively studied in mammals. Spm and Spd acetylation by Spd/Spm-N¹-acetyltransferase (Enzyme Commission no. 2.3.1.57) precedes the catabolism of PAs and is a rate-limiting step in the catabolic pathway (Wallace et al., 2003). A mammalian polyamine oxidase (PAO), which requires FAD as a cofactor, oxidizes N¹-acetyl Spm and N¹-acetyl Spd at the carbon on the exo-side of the N⁴-nitrogen to produce Spd and Put, respectively (Wang et al., 2001; Vujcic et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2003; Cona et al., 2006). Mammalian spermine oxidases (SMOs) perform oxidation of the carbon on the exo-side of the N⁴-nitrogen to produce Spd, 3-aminopropanal, and hydrogen peroxide (Vujcic et al., 2002; Cervelli et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003). Thus, mammalian PAOs and SMOs are classified as back-conversion (BC)-type PAOs.In plants, Spm, T-Spm, and Spd are catabolized by PAO. Plant PAOs derived from maize (Zea mays) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) catalyze terminal catabolism (TC)-type reactions (Tavladoraki et al., 1998). TC-type PAOs oxidize the carbon at the endo-side of the N⁴-nitrogen of Spm and Spd to produce N-(3-aminopropyl)-4-aminobutanal and 4-aminobutanal, respectively, plus 1,3-diaminopropane and hydrogen peroxide (Cona et al., 2006; Angelini et al., 2008, 2010). The Arabidopsis genome contains five PAO genes, designated as AtPAO1 to AtPAO5. Four recombinant AtPAOs, AtPAO1 to AtPAO4, have been homogenously purified and characterized (Tavladoraki et al., 2006; Kamada-Nobusada et al., 2008; Moschou et al., 2008; Takahashi et al., 2010; Fincato et al., 2011, 2012). AtPAO1 to AtPAO4 possess activities that convert Spm (or T-Spm) to Spd, called partial BC, or they convert Spm (or T-Spm) first to Spd and subsequently to Put, called full BC. Ahou et al. (2014) report that recombinant AtPAO5 also catalyzes a BC-type reaction. Therefore, all Arabidopsis PAOs are BC-type enzymes (Kamada-Nobusada et al., 2008; Moschou et al., 2008; Takahashi et al., 2010; Fincato et al., 2011, 2012; Ahou et al., 2014). Four of the seven PAOs in rice (Oryza sativa; OsPAO1, OsPAO3, OsPAO4, and OsPAO5) catalyze BC-type reactions (Ono et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014a), whereas OsPAO7 catalyzes a TC-type reaction (Liu et al., 2014b). OsPAO2 and OsPAO6 remain to be characterized, but may catalyze TC-type reactions based on their structural similarity with OsPAO7. Therefore, plants possess both TC-type and BC-type PAOs.PAs are involved in plant growth and development. Recent molecular genetic analyses in Arabidopsis indicate that metabolic blocks at the ADC, SPDS, or SAMDC steps lead to embryo lethality (Imai et al., 2004; Urano et al., 2005; Ge et al., 2006). Potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants with suppressed SAMDC expression display abnormal phenotypes (Kumar et al., 1996). It was also reported that hydrogen peroxide derived from PA catabolism affects root development and xylem differentiation (Tisi et al., 2011). These studies indicate that flux through metabolic and catabolic PA pathways is required for growth and development. The Arabidopsis acl5 mutant, which lacks T-Spm synthase activity, displays excessive differentiation of xylem tissues and a dwarf phenotype, especially in stems (Hanzawa et al., 2000; Kakehi et al., 2008, 2010). An allelic ACL5 mutant (thickvein [tkv]) exhibits a similar phenotype as that of acl5 (Clay and Nelson, 2005). These results indicate that T-Spm plays an important role in Arabidopsis xylem differentiation (Vera-Sirera et al., 2010; Takano et al., 2012).Here, we demonstrate that Arabidopsis pao5 mutants contain 2-fold higher T-Spm levels and exhibit aerial tissue growth retardation approximately 50 d after sowing compared with that of wild-type plants. Growth inhibition of pao5 stems and leaves at an early stage of development is induced by growth on media containing low T-Spm concentrations. Complementation of pao5 with AtPAO5 rescues T-Spm-induced growth inhibition. We confirm that recombinant AtPAO5 catalyzes BC of T-Spm (or Spm) to Spd. Our data strongly suggest that endogenous T-Spm levels in Arabidopsis are fine tuned, and that AtPAO5 regulates T-Spm homeostasis through a T-Spm oxidation pathway.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Rhamnolipids Elicit Defense Responses and Induce Disease Resistance against Biotrophic, Hemibiotrophic, and Necrotrophic Pathogens That Require Different Signaling Pathways in Arabidopsis and Highlight a Central Role for Salicylic Acid

Plant resistance to phytopathogenic microorganisms mainly relies on the activation of an innate immune response usually launched after recognition by the plant cells of microbe-associated molecular patterns. The plant hormones, salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid, and ethylene have emerged as key players in the signaling networks involved in plant immunity. Rhamnolipids (RLs) are glycolipids produced by bacteria and are involved in surface motility and biofilm development. Here we report that RLs trigger an immune response in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) characterized by signaling molecules accumulation and defense gene activation. This immune response participates to resistance against the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato, the biotrophic oomycete Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, and the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. We show that RL-mediated resistance involves different signaling pathways that depend on the type of pathogen. Ethylene is involved in RL-induced resistance to H. arabidopsidis and to P. syringae pv tomato whereas jasmonic acid is essential for the resistance to B. cinerea. SA participates to the restriction of all pathogens. We also show evidence that SA-dependent plant defenses are potentiated by RLs following challenge by B. cinerea or P. syringae pv tomato. These results highlight a central role for SA in RL-mediated resistance. In addition to the activation of plant defense responses, antimicrobial properties of RLs are thought to participate in the protection against the fungus and the oomycete. Our data highlight the intricate mechanisms involved in plant protection triggered by a new type of molecule that can be perceived by plant cells and that can also act directly onto pathogens.In their environment, plants are challenged by potentially pathogenic microorganisms. In response, they express a set of defense mechanisms including preformed structural and chemical barriers, as well as an innate immune response quickly activated after microorganism perception (Boller and Felix, 2009). Plant innate immunity is triggered after recognition by pattern recognition receptors of conserved pathogen- or microbe-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs or MAMPs, respectively) or by plant endogenous molecules released by pathogen invasion and called danger-associated molecular patterns (Boller and Felix, 2009; Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). This first step of recognition leads to the activation of MAMP-triggered immunity (MTI). Successful pathogens can secrete effectors that interfere or suppress MTI, resulting in effector-triggered susceptibility. A second level of perception involves the direct or indirect recognition by specific receptors of pathogen effectors leading to effector-triggered immunity (ETI; Boller and Felix, 2009; Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). Whereas MTI and ETI are thought to involve common signaling network, ETI is usually quantitatively stronger than MTI and associated with more sustained and robust immune responses (Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010; Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010).The plant hormones, salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) have emerged as key players in the signaling networks involved in MTI and ETI (Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2007; Tsuda et al., 2009; Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010; Mersmann et al., 2010; Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010; Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2011). Interactions between these signal molecules allow the plant to activate and/or modulate an appropriate spectrum of responses, depending on the pathogen lifestyle, necrotroph or biotroph (Glazebrook, 2005; Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008). It is assumed that JA and ET signaling pathways are important for resistance to necrotrophic fungi including Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola (Thomma et al., 2001; Ferrari et al., 2003; Glazebrook, 2005). Infection of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) with B. cinerea causes the induction of the JA/ET responsive gene PLANT DEFENSIN1.2 (PDF1.2; Penninckx et al., 1996; Zimmerli et al., 2001). Induction of PDF1.2 by B. cinerea is blocked in ethylene-insensitive2 (ein2) and coronatine-insensitive1 (coi1) mutants that are respectively defective in ET and JA signal transduction pathways. Moreover, ein2 and coi1 plants are highly susceptible to B. cinerea infection (Thomma et al., 1998; Thomma et al., 1999). JA/ET-dependent responses do not seem to be usually induced during resistance to biotrophs, but they can be effective if they are stimulated prior to pathogen challenge (Glazebrook, 2005). Plants impaired in SA signaling are highly susceptible to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens. Following pathogen infection, SA hydroxylase (NahG), enhanced disease susceptibility5 (eds5), or SA induction-deficient2 (sid2) plants are unable to accumulate high SA levels and they display heightened susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst), Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, or Erysiphe orontii (Delaney et al., 1994; Lawton et al., 1995; Wildermuth et al., 2001; Nawrath et al., 2002; Vlot et al., 2009). Mutants that are insensitive to SA, such as nonexpressor of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED (PR) genes1 (npr1), have enhanced susceptibility to these pathogens (Cao et al., 1994; Glazebrook et al., 1996; Shah et al., 1997; Dong, 2004). According to some reports, plant defense against necrotrophs also involves SA. Arabidopsis plants expressing the nahG gene and infected with B. cinerea show larger lesions compared with wild-type plants (Govrin and Levine, 2002). In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), acidic isoforms of PR3 and PR5 gene that are specifically induced by SA (Ménard et al., 2004) are up-regulated after challenge by B. cinerea (El Oirdi et al., 2010). Resistance to some necrotrophs like Fusarium graminearum involves both SA and JA signaling pathways (Makandar et al., 2010). It is assumed that SA and JA signaling can be antagonistic (Bostock, 2005; Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Thaler et al., 2012). In Arabidopsis, SA inhibits JA-dependent resistance against A. brassicicola or B. cinerea (Spoel et al., 2007; Koornneef et al., 2008). Recent studies demonstrated that ET modulates the NPR1-mediated antagonism between SA and JA (Leon-Reyes et al., 2009; Leon-Reyes et al., 2010a) and suppression by SA of JA-responsive gene expression is targeted at a position downstream of the JA biosynthesis pathway (Leon-Reyes et al., 2010b). Synergistic effects of SA- and JA-dependent signaling are also well documented (Schenk et al., 2000; van Wees et al., 2000; Mur et al., 2006) and induction of some defense responses after pathogen challenge requires intact JA, ET, and SA signaling pathways (Campbell et al., 2003).Isolated MAMPs trigger defense responses that also require the activation of SA, JA, and ET signaling pathways (Tsuda et al., 2009; Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010). For instance, treatment with the flagellin peptide flg22 induces many SA-related genes including SID2, EDS5, NPR1, and PR1 (Ferrari et al., 2007; Denoux et al., 2008), causes SA accumulation (Tsuda et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009), and activates ET signaling (Bethke et al., 2009; Mersmann et al., 2010). Local application of lipopolysaccharides elevates the level of SA (Mishina and Zeier, 2007). The oomycete Pep13 peptide induces defense responses in potato (Solanum tuberosum) that require both SA and JA (Halim et al., 2009). Although signaling networks induced by isolated MAMPs are well documented, the contribution of SA, JA, and ET in MAMP- or PAMP-induced resistance to biotrophs and necrotrophs is poorly understood.Rhamnolipids (RLs) are glycolipids produced by various bacteria species including some Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species. They are essential for bacterial surface motility and biofilm development (Vatsa et al., 2010; Chrzanowski et al., 2012). RLs are potent stimulators of animal immunity (Vatsa et al., 2010). They have recently been shown to elicit plant defense responses and to induce resistance against B. cinerea in grapevine (Vitis vinifera; Varnier et al., 2009). They also participate to biocontrol activity of the plant beneficial bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa PNA1 against oomycetes (Perneel et al., 2008). However, the signaling pathways used by RLs to stimulate plant innate immunity are not known. To gain more insights into RL-induced MTI, we investigated RL-triggered defense responses and resistance to the necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea, the biotroph oomycete H. arabidopsidis, and the hemibiotroph bacterium Pst in Arabidopsis. Our results show that RLs trigger an innate immune response in Arabidopsis that protects the plant against these different lifestyle pathogens. We demonstrate that RL-mediated resistance involves separated signaling sectors that depend on the type of pathogen. In plants challenged by RLs, SA has a central role and participates to the restriction of the three pathogens. ET is fully involved in RL-induced resistance to the biotrophic oomycete and to the hemibiotrophic bacterium whereas JA is essential for the resistance to the necrotrophic fungus.     

The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels

In plants, K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) is the largest potassium (K) transporter family; however, few of the members have had their physiological functions characterized in planta. Here, we studied OsHAK5 of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice (Oryza sativa). We determined its cellular and tissue localization and analyzed its functions in rice using both OsHAK5 knockout mutants and overexpression lines in three genetic backgrounds. A β-glucuronidase reporter driven by the OsHAK5 native promoter indicated OsHAK5 expression in various tissue organs from root to seed, abundantly in root epidermis and stele, the vascular tissues, and mesophyll cells. Net K influx rate in roots and K transport from roots to aerial parts were severely impaired by OsHAK5 knockout but increased by OsHAK5 overexpression in 0.1 and 0.3 mm K external solution. The contribution of OsHAK5 to K mobilization within the rice plant was confirmed further by the change of K concentration in the xylem sap and K distribution in the transgenic lines when K was removed completely from the external solution. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots and salt stress tolerance (shoot growth), while knockout of OsHAK5 decreased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots, resulting in sensitivity to salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsHAK5 plays a major role in K acquisition by roots faced with low external K and in K upward transport from roots to shoots in K-deficient rice plants.Potassium (K) is one of the three most important macronutrients and the most abundant cation in plants. As a major osmoticum in the vacuole, K drives the generation of turgor pressure, enabling cell expansion. In the vascular tissue, K is an important participant in the generation of root pressure (for review, see Wegner, 2014 [including his new hypothesis]). In the phloem, K is critical for the transport of photoassimilates from source to sink (Marschner, 1996; Deeken et al., 2002; Gajdanowicz et al., 2011). In addition, enhancing K absorption and decreasing sodium (Na) accumulation is a major strategy of glycophytes in salt stress tolerance (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999; Munns and Tester, 2008; Shabala and Cuin, 2008).Plants acquire K through K-permeable proteins at the root surface. Since available K concentration in the soil may vary by 100-fold, plants have developed multiple K uptake systems for adapting to this variability (Epstein et al., 1963; Grabov, 2007; Maathuis, 2009). In a classic K uptake experiment in barley (Hordeum vulgare), root K absorption has been described as a high-affinity and low-affinity biphasic transport process (Epstein et al., 1963). It is generally assumed that the low-affinity transport system (LATS) in the roots mediates K uptake in the millimolar range and that the activity of this system is insensitive to external K concentration (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997; Chérel et al., 2014). In contrast, the high-affinity transport system (HATS) was rapidly up-regulated when the supply of exogenous K was halted (Glass, 1976; Glass and Dunlop, 1978).The membrane transporters for K flux identified in plants are generally classified into three channels and three transporter families based on phylogenetic analysis (Mäser et al., 2001; Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Lebaudy et al., 2007; Alemán et al., 2011). For K uptake, it was predicted that, under most circumstances, K transporters function as HATS, while K-permeable channels mediate LATS (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997). However, a root-expressed K channel in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Arabidopsis K Transporter1 (AKT1), mediates K absorption over a wide range of external K concentrations (Sentenac et al., 1992; Lagarde et al., 1996; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999), while evidence is accumulating that many K transporters, including members of the K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) family, are low-affinity K transporters (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Senn et al., 2001), implying that functions of plant K channels and transporters overlap at different K concentration ranges.Out of the three families of K transporters, cation proton antiporter (CPA), high affinity K/Na transporter (HKT), and KT/HAK/KUP, CPA was characterized as a K⁺(Na⁺)/H⁺ antiporter, HKT may cotransport Na and K or transport Na only (Rubio et al., 1995; Uozumi et al., 2000), while KT/HAK/KUP were predicted to be H⁺-coupled K⁺ symporters (Mäser et al., 2001; Lebaudy et al., 2007). KT/HAK/KUP were named by different researchers who first identified and cloned them (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Santa-María et al., 1997). In plants, the KT/HAK/KUP family is the largest K transporter family, including 13 members in Arabidopsis and 27 members in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome (Rubio et al., 2000; Mäser et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2008). Sequence alignments show that genes of this family share relatively low homology to each other. The KT/HAK/KUP family was divided into four major clusters (Rubio et al., 2000; Gupta et al., 2008), and in cluster I and II, they were further separated into A and B groups. Genes of cluster I or II likely exist in all plants, cluster III is composed of genes from both Arabidopsis and rice, while cluster IV includes only four rice genes (Grabov, 2007; Gupta et al., 2008).The functions of KT/HAK/KUP were studied mostly in heterologous expression systems. Transporters of cluster I, such as AtHAK5, HvHAK1, OsHAK1, and OsHAK5, are localized in the plasma membrane (Kim et al., 1998; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gierth et al., 2005) and exhibit high-affinity K uptake in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Santa-María et al., 1997; Fu and Luan, 1998; Rubio et al., 2000) and in Escherichia coli (Horie et al., 2011). Transporters of cluster II, like AtKUP4 (TINY ROOT HAIRS1, TRH1), HvHAK2, OsHAK2, OsHAK7, and OsHAK10, could not complement the K uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but were able to mediate K fluxes in a bacterial mutant; they might be tonoplast transporters (Senn et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006). The function of transporters in clusters III and IV is even less known (Grabov, 2007).Existing data suggest that some KT/HAK/KUP transporters also may respond to salinity stress (Maathuis, 2009). The cluster I transporters of HvHAK1 mediate Na influx (Santa-María et al., 1997), while AtHAK5 expression is inhibited by Na (Rubio et al., 2000; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). Expression of OsHAK5 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY2 cells enhanced the salt tolerance of these cells by accumulating more K without affecting their Na content (Horie et al., 2011).There are only scarce reports on the physiological function of KT/HAK/KUP in planta. In Arabidopsis, mutation of AtKUP2 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL3) resulted in a short hypocotyl, small leaves, and a short flowering stem (Elumalai et al., 2002), while a loss-of-function mutation of AtKUP4 (TRH1) resulted in short root hairs and a loss of gravity response in the root (Rigas et al., 2001; Desbrosses et al., 2003; Ahn et al., 2004). AtHAK5 is the only system currently known to mediate K uptake at concentrations below 0.01 mm (Rubio et al., 2010) and provides a cesium uptake pathway (Qi et al., 2008). AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 are the two major physiologically relevant molecular entities mediating K uptake into roots in the range between 0.01 and 0.05 mm (Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et al., 2010). AtAKT1 may contribute to K uptake within the K concentrations that belong to the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (1963).Among all 27 members of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, OsHAK19, and OsHAK20 were grouped in cluster IB (Gupta et al., 2008). These four rice HAK members share 50.9% to 53.4% amino acid identity with AtHAK5. OsHAK1 was expressed in the whole plant, with maximum expression in roots, and was up-regulated by K deficiency; it mediated high-affinity K uptake in yeast (Bañuelos et al., 2002). In this study, we examined the tissue-specific localization and the physiological functions of OsHAK5 in response to variation in K supply and to salt stress in rice. By comparing K uptake and translocation in OsHAK5 knockout (KO) mutants and in OsHAK5-overexpressing lines with those in their respective wild-type lines supplied with different K concentrations, we found that OsHAK5 not only mediates high-affinity K acquisition but also participates in root-to-shoot K transport as well as in K-regulated salt tolerance.     

Xyloglucan Deficiency Disrupts Microtubule Stability and Cellulose Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis,Altering Cell Growth and Morphogenesis

Xyloglucan constitutes most of the hemicellulose in eudicot primary cell walls and functions in cell wall structure and mechanics. Although Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) xxt1 xxt2 mutants lacking detectable xyloglucan are viable, they display growth defects that are suggestive of alterations in wall integrity. To probe the mechanisms underlying these defects, we analyzed cellulose arrangement, microtubule patterning and dynamics, microtubule- and wall-integrity-related gene expression, and cellulose biosynthesis in xxt1 xxt2 plants. We found that cellulose is highly aligned in xxt1 xxt2 cell walls, that its three-dimensional distribution is altered, and that microtubule patterning and stability are aberrant in etiolated xxt1 xxt2 hypocotyls. We also found that the expression levels of microtubule-associated genes, such as MAP70-5 and CLASP, and receptor genes, such as HERK1 and WAK1, were changed in xxt1 xxt2 plants and that cellulose synthase motility is reduced in xxt1 xxt2 cells, corresponding with a reduction in cellulose content. Our results indicate that loss of xyloglucan affects both the stability of the microtubule cytoskeleton and the production and patterning of cellulose in primary cell walls. These findings establish, to our knowledge, new links between wall integrity, cytoskeletal dynamics, and wall synthesis in the regulation of plant morphogenesis.The primary walls of growing plant cells are largely constructed of cellulose and noncellulosic matrix polysaccharides that include hemicelluloses and pectins (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993; Somerville et al., 2004; Cosgrove, 2005). Xyloglucan (XyG) is the most abundant hemicellulose in the primary walls of eudicots and is composed of a β-1,4-glucan backbone with side chains containing Xyl, Gal, and Fuc (Park and Cosgrove, 2015). XyG is synthesized in the Golgi apparatus before being secreted to the apoplast, and its biosynthesis requires several glycosyltransferases, including β-1,4-glucosyltransferase, α-1,6-xylosyltransferase, β-1,2-galactosyltransferase, and α-1,2-fucosyltransferase activities (Zabotina, 2012). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) XYLOGLUCAN XYLOSYLTRANSFERASE1 (XXT1) and XXT2 display xylosyltransferase activity in vitro (Faik et al., 2002; Cavalier and Keegstra, 2006), and strikingly, no XyG is detectable in the walls of xxt1 xxt2 double mutants (Cavalier et al., 2008; Park and Cosgrove, 2012a), suggesting that the activity of XXT1 and XXT2 are required for XyG synthesis, delivery, and/or stability.Much attention has been paid to the interactions between cellulose and XyG over the past 40 years. Currently, there are several hypotheses concerning the nature of these interactions (Park and Cosgrove, 2015). One possibility is that XyGs bind directly to cellulose microfibrils (CMFs). Recent data indicating that crystalline cellulose cores are surrounded with hemicelluloses support this hypothesis (Dick-Pérez et al., 2011). It is also possible that XyG acts as a spacer-molecule to prevent CMFs from aggregating in cell walls (Anderson et al., 2010) or as an adapter to link cellulose with other cell wall components, such as pectin (Cosgrove, 2005; Cavalier et al., 2008). XyG can be covalently linked to pectin (Thompson and Fry, 2000; Popper and Fry, 2005, 2008), and NMR data demonstrate that pectins and cellulose might interact to a greater extent than XyG and cellulose in native walls (Dick-Pérez et al., 2011). Alternative models exist for how XyG-cellulose interactions influence primary wall architecture and mechanics. One such model posits that XyG chains act as load-bearing tethers that bind to CMFs in primary cell walls to form a cellulose-XyG network (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993; Pauly et al., 1999; Somerville et al., 2004; Cosgrove, 2005). However, results have been accumulating against this tethered network model, leading to an alternative model in which CMFs make direct contact, in some cases mediated by a monolayer of xyloglucan, at limited cell wall sites dubbed “biomechanical hotspots,” which are envisioned as the key sites of cell wall loosening during cell growth (Park and Cosgrove, 2012a; Wang et al., 2013; Park and Cosgrove, 2015). Further molecular, biochemical, and microscopy experiments are required to help distinguish which aspects of the load-bearing, spacer/plasticizer, and/or hotspot models most accurately describe the functions of XyG in primary walls.Cortical microtubules (MTs) direct CMF deposition by guiding cellulose synthase complexes in the plasma membrane (Baskin et al., 2004; Paredez et al., 2006; Emons et al., 2007; Sánchez-Rodriguez et al., 2012), and the patterned deposition of cellulose in the wall in turn can help determine plant cell anisotropic growth and morphogenesis (Baskin, 2005). Disruption of cortical MTs by oryzalin, a MT-depolymerizing drug, alters the alignment of CMFs, suggesting that MTs contribute to CMF organization (Baskin et al., 2004). CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) genes, including CESA1, CESA3, and CESA6, are required for normal CMF synthesis in primary cell walls (Kohorn et al., 2006; Desprez et al., 2007), and accessory proteins such as COBRA function in cellulose production (Lally et al., 2001). Live-cell imaging from double-labeled YFP-CESA6; CFP-ALPHA-1 TUBULIN (TUA1) Arabidopsis seedlings provides direct evidence that cortical MTs determine the trajectories of cellulose synthesis complexes (CSCs) and patterns of cellulose deposition (Paredez et al., 2006). Additionally, MT organization affects the rotation of cellulose synthase trajectories in the epidermal cells of Arabidopsis hypocotyls (Chan et al., 2010). Recently, additional evidence for direct guidance of CSCs by MTs has been provided by the identification of CSI1/POM2, which binds to both MTs and CESAs (Bringmann et al., 2012; Li et al., 2012). MICROTUBULE ORGANIZATION1 (MOR1) is essential for cortical MT organization (Whittington et al., 2001), but disruption of cortical MTs in the mor1 mutant does not greatly affect CMF organization (Sugimoto et al., 2003), and oryzalin treatment does not abolish CSC motility (Paredez et al., 2006).Conversely, the organization of cortical MTs can be affected by cellulose synthesis. Treatment with isoxaben, a cellulose synthesis inhibitor, results in disorganized cortical MTs in tobacco cells, suggesting that inhibition of cellulose synthesis affects MT organization (Fisher and Cyr, 1998), and treatment with 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile, another cellulose synthesis inhibitor, alters MT organization in mor1 plants (Himmelspach et al., 2003). Cortical MT orientation in Arabidopsis roots is also altered in two cellulose synthesis-deficient mutants, CESA6^52-isx and kor1-3, suggesting that CSC activity can affect MT arrays (Paredez et al., 2008). Together, these results point to a bidirectional relationship between cellulose synthesis/patterning and MT organization.MTs influence plant organ morphology, but the detailed mechanisms by which they do so are incompletely understood. The dynamics and stability of cortical MTs are also affected by MT-associated proteins (MAPs). MAP18 is a MT destabilizing protein that depolymerizes MTs (Wang et al., 2007), MAP65-1 functions as a MT crosslinker, and MAP70-1 functions in MT assembly (Korolev et al., 2005; Lucas et al., 2011). MAP70-5 stabilizes existing MTs to maintain their length, and its overexpression induces right-handed helical growth (Korolev et al., 2007); likewise, MAP20 overexpression results in helical cell twisting (Rajangam et al., 2008). CLASP promotes microtubule stability, and its mutant is hypersensitive to microtubule-destabilizing drug oryzalin (Ambrose et al., 2007). KATANIN1 (KTN1) is a MT-severing protein that can sever MTs into short fragments and promote the formation of thick MT bundles that ultimately depolymerize (Stoppin-Mellet et al., 2006), and loss of KTN1 function results in reduced responses to mechanical stress (Uyttewaal et al., 2012). In general, cortical MT orientation responds to mechanical signals and can be altered by applying force directly to the shoot apical meristem (Hamant et al., 2008). The application of external mechanical pressure to Arabidopsis leaves also triggers MT bundling (Jacques et al., 2013). Kinesins, including KINESIN-13A (KIN-13A) and FRAGILE FIBER1 (FRA1), have been implicated in cell wall synthesis (Cheung and Wu, 2011; Fujikura et al., 2014). The identification of cell wall receptors and sensors is beginning to reveal how plant cell walls sense and respond to external signals (Humphrey et al., 2007; Ringli, 2010); some of them, such as FEI1, FEI2, THESEUS1 (THE1), FERONIA (FER), HERCULES RECEPTOR KINASE1 (HERK1), WALL ASSOCIATED KINASE1 (WAK1), WAK2, and WAK4, have been characterized (Lally et al., 2001; Decreux and Messiaen, 2005; Kohorn et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2009; Cheung and Wu, 2011). However, the relationships between wall integrity, cytoskeletal dynamics, and wall synthesis have not yet been fully elucidated.In this study, we analyzed CMF patterning, MT patterning and dynamics, and cellulose biosynthesis in the Arabidopsis xxt1 xxt2 double mutant that lacks detectable XyG and displays altered growth (Cavalier et al., 2008; Park and Cosgrove, 2012a). To investigate whether and how XyG deficiency affects the organization of CMFs and cortical MTs, we observed CMF patterning in xxt1 xxt2 mutants and Col (wild-type) controls using atomic force microscopy (AFM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal microscopy (Hodick and Kutschera, 1992; Derbyshire et al., 2007; Anderson et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2014). We also generated transgenic Col and xxt1 xxt2 lines expressing GFP-MAP4 (Marc et al., 1998) and GFP-CESA3 (Desprez et al., 2007), and analyzed MT arrays and cellulose synthesis using live-cell imaging. Our results show that the organization of CMFs is altered, that MTs in xxt1 xxt2 mutants are aberrantly organized and are more sensitive to external mechanical pressure and the MT-depolymerizing drug oryzalin, and that cellulose synthase motility and cellulose content are decreased in xxt1 xxt2 mutants. Furthermore, real-time quantitative RT-PCR measurements indicate that the enhanced sensitivity of cortical MTs to mechanical stress and oryzalin in xxt1 xxt2 plants might be due to altered expression of MT-stabilizing and wall receptor genes. Together, these data provide insights into the connections between the functions of XyG in wall assembly, the mechanical integrity of the cell wall, cytoskeleton-mediated cellular responses to deficiencies in wall biosynthesis, and cell and tissue morphogenesis.