Evolution of Conifer Diterpene Synthases: Diterpene Resin Acid Biosynthesis in Lodgepole Pine and Jack Pine Involves Monofunctional and Bifunctional Diterpene Synthases

Abscisic acid (ABA) induces stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. The mechanisms in these two processes are not necessarily the same. It has been postulated that the ABA receptors involved in opening inhibition are different from those involved in closure induction. Here, we provide evidence that four recently identified ABA receptors (PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1 [PYR1], PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE1 [PYL1], PYL2, and PYL4) are not sufficient for opening inhibition in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ABA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in the pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4 quadruple ABA receptor mutant. ABA inhibition of the opening of the mutant’s stomata remained intact. ABA did not induce either the production of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide or the alkalization of the cytosol in the quadruple mutant, in accordance with the closure phenotype. Whole cell patch-clamp analysis of inward-rectifying K⁺ current in guard cells showed a partial inhibition by ABA, indicating that the ABA sensitivity of the mutant was not fully impaired. ABA substantially inhibited blue light-induced phosphorylation of H⁺-ATPase in guard cells in both the mutant and the wild type. On the other hand, in a knockout mutant of the SNF1-related protein kinase, srk2e, stomatal opening and closure, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production, cytosolic alkalization, inward-rectifying K⁺ current inactivation, and H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation were not sensitive to ABA.The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), which is synthesized in response to abiotic stresses, plays a key role in the drought hardiness of plants. Reducing transpirational water loss through stomatal pores is a major ABA response (Schroeder et al., 2001). ABA promotes the closure of open stomata and inhibits the opening of closed stomata. These effects are not simply the reverse of one another (Allen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001; Mishra et al., 2006).A class of receptors of ABA was identified (Ma et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Santiago et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 2010). The sensitivity of stomata to ABA was strongly decreased in quadruple and sextuple mutants of the ABA receptor genes PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE/PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE/REGULATORY COMPONENT OF ABSCISIC ACID RECEPTOR (PYR/PYL/RCAR; Nishimura et al., 2010; Gonzalez-Guzman et al., 2012). The PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors are involved in the early ABA signaling events, in which a sequence of interactions of the receptors with PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2Cs (PP2Cs) and subfamily 2 SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASES (SnRK2s) leads to the activation of downstream ABA signaling targets in guard cells (Cutler et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Weiner et al., 2010). Studies of Commelina communis and Vicia faba suggested that the ABA receptors involved in stomatal opening are not the same as the ABA receptors involved in stomatal closure (Allan et al., 1994; Anderson et al., 1994; Assmann, 1994; Schwartz et al., 1994). The roles of PYR/PYL/RCAR in either stomatal opening or closure remained to be elucidated.Blue light induces stomatal opening through the activation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase in guard cells that generates an inside-negative electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane and drives K⁺ uptake through voltage-dependent inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 1986; Blatt, 1987; Schroeder et al., 1987; Thiel et al., 1992). Phosphorylation of the penultimate Thr of the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is a prerequisite for blue light-induced activation of the H⁺-ATPase (Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999, 2002). ABA inhibits H⁺-ATPase activity through dephosphorylation of the penultimate Thr in the C terminus of the H⁺-ATPase in guard cells, resulting in prevention of the opening (Goh et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2004; Hayashi et al., 2011). Inward-rectifying K⁺ currents (I_Kin) of guard cells are negatively regulated by ABA in addition to through the decline of the H⁺ pump-driven membrane potential difference (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Blatt, 1990; McAinsh et al., 1990; Schwartz et al., 1994; Grabov and Blatt, 1999; Saito et al., 2008). This down-regulation of ion transporters by ABA is essential for the inhibition of stomatal opening.A series of second messengers has been shown to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidases play a crucial role in ABA signaling in guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Jannat et al., 2011). Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential signaling component in ABA-induced stomatal closure (Desikan et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2003; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2007; Neill et al., 2008). Alkalization of cytosolic pH in guard cells is postulated to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Pisum sativum and Paphiopedilum species (Irving et al., 1992; Gehring et al., 1997; Grabov and Blatt, 1997; Suhita et al., 2004; Gonugunta et al., 2008). These second messengers transduce environmental signals to ion channels and ion transporters that create the driving force for stomatal movements (Ward et al., 1995; MacRobbie, 1998; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003).In this study, we examined the mobilization of second messengers, the inactivation of I_Kin, and the suppression of H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation evoked by ABA in Arabidopsis mutants to clarify the downstream signaling events of ABA signaling in guard cells. The mutants included a quadruple mutant of PYR/PYL/RCARs, pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4, and a mutant of a SnRK2 kinase, srk2e.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Identification of Cyclic GMP-Activated Nonselective Ca2+-Permeable Cation Channels and Associated CNGC5 and CNGC6 Genes in Arabidopsis Guard Cells

Cytosolic Ca²⁺ in guard cells plays an important role in stomatal movement responses to environmental stimuli. These cytosolic Ca²⁺ increases result from Ca²⁺ influx through Ca²⁺-permeable channels in the plasma membrane and Ca²⁺ release from intracellular organelles in guard cells. However, the genes encoding defined plasma membrane Ca²⁺-permeable channel activity remain unknown in guard cells and, with some exceptions, largely unknown in higher plant cells. Here, we report the identification of two Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cation channel genes, CNGC5 and CNGC6, that are highly expressed in guard cells. Cytosolic application of cyclic GMP (cGMP) and extracellularly applied membrane-permeable 8-Bromoguanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate-cGMP both activated hyperpolarization-induced inward-conducting currents in wild-type guard cells using Mg²⁺ as the main charge carrier. The cGMP-activated currents were strongly blocked by lanthanum and gadolinium and also conducted Ba²⁺, Ca²⁺, and Na⁺ ions. cngc5 cngc6 double mutant guard cells exhibited dramatically impaired cGMP-activated currents. In contrast, mutations in CNGC1, CNGC2, and CNGC20 did not disrupt these cGMP-activated currents. The yellow fluorescent protein-CNGC5 and yellow fluorescent protein-CNGC6 proteins localize in the cell periphery. Cyclic AMP activated modest inward currents in both wild-type and cngc5cngc6 mutant guard cells. Moreover, cngc5 cngc6 double mutant guard cells exhibited functional abscisic acid (ABA)-activated hyperpolarization-dependent Ca²⁺-permeable cation channel currents, intact ABA-induced stomatal closing responses, and whole-plant stomatal conductance responses to darkness and changes in CO₂ concentration. Furthermore, cGMP-activated currents remained intact in the growth controlled by abscisic acid2 and abscisic acid insensitive1 mutants. This research demonstrates that the CNGC5 and CNGC6 genes encode unique cGMP-activated nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channels in the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis guard cells.Plants lose water via transpiration and take in CO₂ for photosynthesis through stomatal pores. Each stomatal pore is surrounded by two guard cells, and stomatal movements are driven by the change of turgor pressure in guard cells. The intracellular second messenger Ca²⁺ functions in guard cell signal transduction (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; McAinsh et al., 1990; Webb et al., 1996; Grabov and Blatt, 1998; Allen et al., 1999; MacRobbie, 2000; Mori et al., 2006; Young et al., 2006; Siegel et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2010; Hubbard et al., 2012). Plasma membrane ion channel activity and gene expression in guard cells are finely regulated by the intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt; Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Webb et al., 2001; Allen et al., 2002; Siegel et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2010; Stange et al., 2010). Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) function as targets of the cytosolic Ca²⁺ signal, and several members of the CPK family have been shown to function in stimulus-induced stomatal closing, including the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CPK3, CPK4, CPK6, CPK10, and CPK11 proteins (Mori et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2010; Brandt et al., 2012; Hubbard et al., 2012). Further research found that several CPKs could activate the S-type anion channel SLAC1 in Xenopus laevis oocytes, including CPK21, CPK23, and CPK6 (Geiger et al., 2010; Brandt et al., 2012). At the same time, the Ca²⁺-independent protein kinase Open Stomata1 mediates stomatal closing and activates the S-type anion channel SLAC1 (Mustilli et al., 2002; Yoshida et al., 2002; Geiger et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2009; Xue et al., 2011), indicating that both Ca²⁺-dependent and Ca²⁺-independent pathways function in guard cells.Multiple essential factors of guard cell abscisic acid (ABA) signal transduction function in the regulation of Ca²⁺-permeable channels and [Ca2+]_cyt elevations, including Abscisic Acid Insensitive1 (ABI1), ABI2, Enhanced Response to Abscisic Acid1 (ERA1), the NADPH oxidases AtrbohD and AtrbohF, the Guard Cell Hydrogen Peroxide-Resistant1 (GHR1) receptor kinase, as well as the Ca²⁺-activated CPK6 protein kinase (Pei et al., 1998; Allen et al., 1999, 2002; Kwak et al., 2003; Miao et al., 2006; Mori et al., 2006; Hua et al., 2012). [Ca2+]_cyt increases result from both Ca²⁺ release from intracellular Ca²⁺ stores (McAinsh et al., 1992) and Ca²⁺ influx across the plasma membrane (Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003; Hua et al., 2012). Electrophysiological analyses have characterized nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable channel activity in the plasma membrane of guard cells (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1990; Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Köhler and Blatt, 2002; Miao et al., 2006; Mori et al., 2006; Suh et al., 2007; Vahisalu et al., 2008; Hua et al., 2012). However, the genetic identities of Ca²⁺-permeable channels in the plasma membrane of guard cells have remained unknown despite over two decades of research on these channel activities.The Arabidopsis genome includes 20 genes encoding cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) homologs and 20 genes encoding homologs to animal Glu receptor channels (Lacombe et al., 2001; Kaplan et al., 2007; Ward et al., 2009), which have been proposed to function in plant cells as cation channels (Schuurink et al., 1998; Arazi et al., 1999; Köhler et al., 1999). Recent research has demonstrated functions of specific Glu receptor channels in mediating Ca²⁺ channel activity (Michard et al., 2011; Vincill et al., 2012). Previous studies have shown cAMP activation of nonselective cation currents in guard cells (Lemtiri-Chlieh and Berkowitz, 2004; Ali et al., 2007). However, only a few studies have shown the disappearance of a defined plasma membrane Ca²⁺ channel activity in plants upon mutation of candidate Ca²⁺ channel genes (Ali et al., 2007; Michard et al., 2011; Laohavisit et al., 2012; Vincill et al., 2012). Some CNGCs have been found to be involved in cation nutrient intake, including monovalent cation intake (Guo et al., 2010; Caballero et al., 2012), salt tolerance (Guo et al., 2008; Kugler et al., 2009), programmed cell death and pathogen responses (Clough et al., 2000; Balagué et al., 2003; Urquhart et al., 2007; Abdel-Hamid et al., 2013), thermal sensing (Finka et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2012), and pollen tube growth (Chang et al., 2007; Frietsch et al., 2007; Tunc-Ozdemir et al., 2013a, 2013b). Direct in vivo disappearance of Ca²⁺ channel activity in cngc disruption mutants has been demonstrated in only a few cases thus far (Ali et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2012). In this research, we show that CNGC5 and CNGC6 are required for a cyclic GMP (cGMP)-activated nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channel activity in the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis guard cells.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase CPK6 Positively Functions in Induction by Yeast Elicitor of Stomatal Closure and Inhibition by Yeast Elicitor of Light-Induced Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis

Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure that is mediated by a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling pathway. A Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase, CPK6, positively regulates activation of ion channels in abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate signaling, leading to stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). YEL also inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. However, it remains unknown whether CPK6 is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure or in inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. In this study, we investigated the roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Disruption of CPK6 gene impaired induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. Activation by YEL of nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channels was impaired in cpk6-2 guard cells, and transient elevations elicited by YEL in cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration were suppressed in cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 guard cells. YEL activated slow anion channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1 and inhibited inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1. The cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 mutations inhibited YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide accumulation in guard cells and apoplast of rosette leaves but did not affect YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide production in the apoplast of rosette leaves. These results suggest that CPK6 positively functions in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis and is a convergent point of signaling pathways for stomatal closure in response to abiotic and biotic stress.Stomata, formed by pairs of guard cells, play a critical role in regulation of plant CO₂ uptake and water loss, thus critically influencing plant growth and water stress responsiveness. Guard cells respond to a variety of abiotic and biotic stimuli, such as light, drought, and pathogen attack (Israelsson et al., 2006; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Melotto et al., 2008).Elicitors derived from microbial surface mimic pathogen attack and induce stomatal closure in various plant species such as Solanum lycopersicum (Lee et al., 1999), Commelina communis (Lee et al., 1999), Hordeum vulgare (Koers et al., 2011), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Melotto et al., 2006; Khokon et al., 2010). Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010; Salam et al., 2013). Our recent studies showed that YEL inhibits light-induced stomatal opening and that protein phosphorylation is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening (Salam et al., 2013).Cytosolic Ca²⁺ has long been recognized as a conserved second messenger in stomatal movement (Shimazaki et al., 2007; Roelfsema and Hedrich 2010; Hubbard et al., 2012). Elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt) is triggered by influx of Ca²⁺ from apoplast and release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores in guard cell signaling (Leckie et al., 1998; Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003). The influx of Ca²⁺ is carried by nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation (I_Ca) channels that are activated by plasma membrane hyperpolarization and H₂O₂ (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003). Elevation of [Ca2+]_cyt activates slow anion (S-type) channels and down-regulates inward-rectifying potassium (K_in) channels in guard cells (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Grabov and Blatt, 1999). The activation of S-type channels is a hallmark of stomatal closure, and the suppression of K_in channels is favorable to stomatal closure but not to stomatal opening (Pei et al., 1997; Kwak et al., 2001; Xue et al., 2011; Uraji et al., 2012).YEL induces stomatal closure with extracellular H₂O₂ production, intracellular H₂O₂ accumulation, activation of I_Ca channels, and transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010). However, it remains to be clarified whether YEL activates S-type channels and inhibits K_in channels in guard cells.Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are regulators in Ca²⁺-dependent guard cell signaling (Mori et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Geiger et al., 2010, 2011; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011; Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). In guard cells, CDPKs regulate activation of S-type and I_Ca channels and inhibition of K_in channels (Mori et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011). A CDPK, CPK6, positively regulates activation of S-type channels and I_Ca channels without affecting H₂O₂ production in abscisic acid (ABA)- and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced stomatal closure (Mori et al., 2006; Munemasa et al., 2011). CPK6 phosphorylates and activates SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED1 expressed in Xenopus spp. oocyte (Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). These findings underline the role of CPK6 in regulation of ion channel activation and stomatal movement, leading us to test whether CPK6 regulates the induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening.In this study, we investigated activation of S-type channels and inhibition of K_in channels by YEL and roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. For this purpose, we examined the effects of mutation of CPK6 on induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening, activation of I_Ca channels, transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations, activation of S-type channels, inhibition of K_in channels, H₂O₂ production in leaves, and H₂O₂ accumulation in leaves and guard cells.     

Focus on Water: Separating Active and Passive Influences on Stomatal Control of Transpiration[OPEN]

Motivated by studies suggesting that the stomata of ferns and lycophytes do not conform to the standard active abscisic acid (ABA) -mediated stomatal control model, we examined stomatal behavior in a conifer species (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) that is phylogenetically midway between the fern and angiosperm clades. Similar to ferns, daytime stomatal closure in response to moderate water stress seemed to be a passive hydraulic process in M. glyptostroboides immediately alleviated by rehydrating excised shoots. Only after prolonged exposure to more extreme water stress did active ABA-mediated stomatal closure become important, because foliar ABA production was triggered after leaf turgor loss. The influence of foliar ABA on stomatal conductance and stomatal aperture was highly predictable and additive with the passive hydraulic influence. M. glyptostroboides thus occupies a stomatal behavior type intermediate between the passively controlled ferns and the characteristic ABA-dependent stomatal closure described in angiosperm herbs. These results highlight the importance of considering phylogeny as a major determinant of stomatal behavior.Stomata regulate parallel diffusive paths of water and carbon dioxide between leaves and the atmosphere, thus assuming a governing role over the processes of transpiration and photosynthesis. Guard cell movements that open and close stomata are increasingly characterized (similarly to animal cells) as being mediated by rapid changes in the polarization state of membranes (Schroeder et al., 2001; Hedrich, 2012; Hills et al., 2012). Despite this membrane-dominated view of stomatal function, the critical goal of modeling stomatal behavior to render predictions of transpiration and photosynthesis typically relies on a hydraulic framework built around the direct impact of leaf hydration on epidermal and guard cell turgor (Buckley, 2005; Damour et al., 2010). Although recent advances in modeling the ionic balance of guard cells (Chen et al., 2012; Hills et al., 2012) yield predictions of stomatal aperture, no macro-scale stomatal model has been able to predict stomatal conductance from the perspective of ion movements into and out of guard cells; however, the effects of key components, such as light, carbon dioxide, and abscisic acid (ABA), on membrane polarization have been studied in detail. Reconciling the dynamics of leaf-scale and canopy-scale transpiration with physical and chemical processes at the guard cell remains a major challenge.Among the obstacles preventing the formulation of a large-scale transpiration model based on membrane ion transport is the fact that much of the characterization of guard cell membrane processes has been confined to a handful of small, ruderal, herbaceous angiosperms. Although species like Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) provide the ideal molecular system for identifying guard cell signal transduction pathways, most of these model species are of little agricultural relevance and being herbaceous, poor physical analogs for the tree species that dominate terrestrial gas exchange. Hence, there is a need to understand whether the same principles governing stomatal control in angiosperm herbs, like Arabidopsis, equally apply to plants that dominate forests and agricultural production. Recent studies suggest that there are important differences in the ion-transport machinery among vascular plants, and despite the presence of potential guard cell signaling pathways throughout the plant kingdom (Dreyer et al., 2012; Brodribb and McAdam, 2013b; Chater et al., 2013), there is evidence of a systematic shift in the behavior of stomata among vascular plants (Doi et al., 2006; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2012a). In particular, the critical closing tendency of stomata during leaf water deficit seems to have evolved from a passive process mediated directly by water potential (passive hydraulic) to an active process controlled by the extrusion of anions from guard cells (active closure; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011). The stomata of ferns and lycophytes predictably respond to plant water deficit as passive hydraulic valves, closing rapidly on dehydration and opening on rehydration (Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2012a). Despite the stomata in these lineages only ever showing functionally passive responses to changes in leaf water status (Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2012a, 2013), some have challenged the concept of a passive origin of stomatal control in vascular plants by showing a conserved activity of key genes involved in active stomatal responses (Ruszala et al., 2011). In seed plants, the closure of stomata in response to water deficit is mediated by augmented levels of ABA, which leads to a depolarization of guard cell membranes triggering osmotic ion efflux and a loss of guard cell turgor (Mittelheuser and Van Steveninck, 1969; Thiel et al., 1992; Geiger et al., 2009, 2011; Bauer et al., 2013). In light of this variation in stomatal control, it seems that a key step to finding a general model for stomatal behavior would be to understand the interactions between active and passive processes in the stomatal movements of major lineages of plants.Conifers contribute significantly to global transpiration and productivity and also seem to have a stomatal control system that is somewhat different from model angiosperm herbs. These distinctions include insensitivity to elevated carbon dioxide (Beadle et al., 1979; Morison and Jarvis, 1983; Brodribb et al., 2009); a lack of epidermal mechanical advantage, resulting in no Ivanov effect (the increase in transpiration from a leaf after excision or exposure to low humidity; Huber, 1923; Stålfelt, 1944; McAdam and Brodribb, 2012a), likely because of heavily lignified dorsal walls (the walls closest to the epidermal cells; Sack, 1987), and a very high length-to-width ratio of open stomatal pores (Copeland, 1902). Furthermore, recent research suggests that different conifer species depend more or less on ABA as an agent of stomatal closure during extended periods of water stress (Brodribb and McAdam, 2013a). The apparent lack of epidermal mechanical advantage in conifer stomata provides an unusual opportunity to examine the impacts of changing leaf water content and evaporation on stomatal conductance and guard cell turgor without the confusing Ivanov effect produced by changes in the ratio of epidermal and guard cell turgor pressure (Raschke, 1970). Manipulating the hydration status of the leaf, thus, allows quantification of the interacting influences of leaf water potential (Ψ_l) and ion transport on stomatal aperture (Brodribb and McAdam, 2013a).Our aim in this study was to determine under what conditions passive (hydraulic) and active (ABA mediated) closures of stomata were important in a representative conifer species. We assumed that, in the absence of a mechanical interaction from the epidermis, it would be possible to characterize both dynamic and steady-state stomatal behavior based on intrinsic leaf properties of ABA sensitivity, hydraulic conductance, capacitance, and hydraulic vulnerability. We chose the conifer Metasequoia glyptostroboides (Cupressaceae) as our subject, because it has leaf characteristics within the range of deciduous angiosperm trees; also, it is one of the few conifer species where stomata are sufficiently visible (unoccluded by waxes) to observe stomatal responses in the isolated epidermis.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Calcium-Dependent and -Independent Stomatal Signaling Network and Compensatory Feedback Control of Stomatal Opening via Ca2+ Sensitivity Priming

Guard cells use compensatory feedback controls to adapt to conditions that produce excessively open stomata.In the past 15 years or more, many mutants that are impaired in stimulus-induced stomatal closing and opening have been identified and functionally characterized in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), leading to a mechanistic understanding of the guard cell signal transduction network. However, evidence has only recently emerged that mutations impairing stomatal closure, in particular those in slow anion channel SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED1 (SLAC1), unexpectedly also exhibit slowed stomatal opening responses. Results suggest that this compensatory slowing of stomatal opening can be attributed to a calcium-dependent posttranslational down-regulation of stomatal opening mechanisms, including down-regulation of inward K⁺ channel activity. Here, we discuss this newly emerging stomatal compensatory feedback control model mediated via constitutive enhancement (priming) of intracellular Ca²⁺ sensitivity of ion channel activity. The CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE6 (CPK6) is strongly activated by physiological Ca²⁺ elevations and a model is discussed and open questions are raised for cross talk among Ca²⁺-dependent and Ca²⁺-independent guard cell signal transduction pathways and Ca²⁺ sensitivity priming mechanisms.Stomatal pores formed by two guard cells enable CO₂ uptake from the atmosphere, but also ensure leaf cooling and provide a pulling force for nutrient uptake from the soil via transpiration. These vitally important processes are inevitably accompanied by water loss through stomata. Stomatal opening and closure is caused by the uptake and release of osmotically active substances and is tightly regulated by signaling pathways that lead to the activation or inactivation of guard cell ion channels and pumps. Potassium ions enter guard cells through the inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (K+_in) during stomatal opening and are released via outward-rectifying K⁺ channels during stomatal closure (Schroeder et al., 1987; Hosy et al., 2003; Roelfsema and Hedrich 2005). Cytosolic Ca²⁺, an important second messenger in plants, mediates ion channel regulation, particularly down-regulation of inward-conducting K+_in channels and activation of S-type anion channels, thus mediating stomatal closure and inhibiting stomatal opening (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Dodd et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010). Stomatal closure is initiated by anion efflux via the slow S-type anion channel SLAC1 (Negi et al., 2008; Vahisalu et al., 2008; Kollist et al., 2011) and the voltage-dependent rapid R-type anion channel QUICK-ACTIVATING ANION CHANNEL1 (Meyer et al. 2010; Sasaki et al., 2010).In recent years, advances have been made toward understanding mechanisms mediating abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure (Cutler et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Raghavendra et al., 2010). The core ABA signaling module, consisting of PYR/RCAR (for pyrabactin resistance 1/regulatory components of ABA receptors) receptors, clade A protein phosphatases (PP2Cs), SNF-related protein kinase OPEN STOMATA1 (OST1), and downstream targets, is Ca²⁺-independent (Ma et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Hubbard et al., 2010). However, ABA-induced stomatal closure was reduced to only 30% of the normal stomatal closure response under conditions that inhibited intracellular cytosolic free calcium ([Ca2+]_cyt) elevations in Arabidopsis (Siegel et al., 2009), consistent with previous findings in other plants (De Silva et al., 1985; Schwartz, 1985; McAinsh et al., 1991; MacRobbie, 2000). Together these and other studies show the importance of [Ca2+]_cyt for a robust ABA-induced stomatal closure. Here, we discuss Ca²⁺-dependent and Ca²⁺-independent signaling pathways in guard cells and open questions on how these may work together.Plants carrying mutations in the SLAC1 anion channel have innately more open stomata, and exhibit clear impairments in ABA-, elevated CO₂-, Ca²⁺-, ozone-, air humidity-, darkness-, and hydrogen peroxide-induced stomatal closure (Negi et al., 2008; Vahisalu et al., 2008; Merilo et al., 2013). Recent research, however, unexpectedly revealed that mutations in SLAC1 also down-regulate stomatal opening mechanisms and slow down stomatal opening (Laanemets et al., 2013).     

Stomatal Blue Light Response Is Present in Early Vascular Plants

Light is a major environmental factor required for stomatal opening. Blue light (BL) induces stomatal opening in higher plants as a signal under the photosynthetic active radiation. The stomatal BL response is not present in the fern species of Polypodiopsida. The acquisition of a stomatal BL response might provide competitive advantages in both the uptake of CO₂ and prevention of water loss with the ability to rapidly open and close stomata. We surveyed the stomatal opening in response to strong red light (RL) and weak BL under the RL with gas exchange technique in a diverse selection of plant species from euphyllophytes, including spermatophytes and monilophytes, to lycophytes. We showed the presence of RL-induced stomatal opening in most of these species and found that the BL responses operated in all euphyllophytes except Polypodiopsida. We also confirmed that the stomatal opening in lycophytes, the early vascular plants, is driven by plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase and K⁺ accumulation in guard cells, which is the same mechanism operating in stomata of angiosperms. These results suggest that the early vascular plants respond to both RL and BL and actively regulate stomatal aperture. We also found three plant species that absolutely require BL for both stomatal opening and photosynthetic CO₂ fixation, including a gymnosperm, C. revoluta, and the ferns Equisetum hyemale and Psilotum nudum.Stomata regulate gas exchange between plants and the atmosphere (Zeiger, 1983; Assmann, 1993; Roelfsema and Hedrich, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010). Acquisition of stomata was a key step in the evolution of terrestrial plants by allowing uptake of CO₂ from the atmosphere and accelerating the provision of nutrients via the transpiration stream within the plant (Hetherington and Woodward, 2003; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013). Stomatal aperture is regulated by changes in the turgor of guard cells, which are induced by environmental factors and endogenous phytohormones. Light is a major factor in the promotion of stomatal opening, and the opening is mediated via two distinct light-regulated pathways that are known as photosynthesis- and blue light (BL)-dependent responses under photosynthetic active radiation (PAR; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Lawson et al., 2014).The photosynthesis-dependent stomatal opening is induced by a continuous high intensity of light, and the action spectrum for the stomatal opening resembles that of photosynthetic pigments in leaves (Willmer and Fricker, 1996). Both mesophyll and guard cells possess photosynthetically active chloroplasts, and their photosynthesis has been suggested to contribute to stomatal opening in leaves. The decrease in the concentration of intercellular CO₂ (Ci) caused by photosynthetic CO₂ fixation or some unidentified mediators and metabolites from mesophyll cells is supposed to elicit stomatal opening, although the exact nature of the events is unclear (Wong et al., 1979; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Roelfsema et al., 2006; Mott et al., 2008; Lawson et al., 2014).BL-dependent stomatal opening requires a strong intensity of PAR as a background: weak BL solely scarcely elicits stomatal opening, but the same intensity of BL induces the fast and large stomatal opening in the presence of strong red light (RL; Ogawa et al., 1978; Shimazaki et al., 2007). Since such stomatal opening requires BL under the RL or PAR, we call the opening reaction a BL-dependent response of stomata. BL-dependent stomatal response takes place and proceeds in natural environments because the sunlight contains both BL and RL and facilitates photosynthetic CO₂ fixation (Assmann, 1988; Takemiya et al., 2013a). In this stomatal response, BL and PAR (BL, RL, and other wavelengths of light) seem to act as a signal and an energy source, respectively.The BL-dependent stomatal opening is initiated by the absorption of BL by phototropin1 and phototropin2 (Kinoshita et al., 2001), the plant-specific BL receptors, in guard cells followed by activation of the plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase (H+-ATPase; Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999). Two newly identified proteins, protein phosphatase1 and blue light signaling1 (BLUS1), mediate the signaling between phototropins and H+-ATPase (Takemiya et al., 2006, 2013a, 2013b). The activated H+-ATPase evokes a plasma membrane hyperpolarization, which drives K⁺ uptake through the voltage-gated, inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann, 1993; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010; Kollist et al., 2014). The accumulation of K⁺ causes water uptake and increases turgor pressure of guard cells, and finally results in stomatal opening. The BL-dependent opening is enhanced by RL, and BL at low intensity is effective in the presence of RL (Ogawa et al., 1978; Iino et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Suetsugu et al., 2014). These stomatal responses by RL and BL are commonly observed in a number of seed plants so far examined.Fine control of stomatal aperture to various environmental factors has been characterized in many angiosperms. Although morphological and mechanical diversity of stomata is widely documented, little is known about the functional diversity (Willmer and Fricker, 1996; Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). Our previous study indicated that BL-dependent stomatal response is absent in the major fern species of Polypodiopsida, including Adiantum capillus-veneris, Pteris cretica, Asplenium scolopendrium, and Nephrolepis auriculata, but the stomata of these species open by PAR including RL (Doi et al., 2006). When the epidermal peels isolated from A. capillus-veneris are treated with photosynthetic electron transport inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Doi and Shimazaki, 2008), the response is completely inhibited, but the responses in the seed plants of Vicia faba and Commelina communis are relatively insensitive to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Schwartz and Zeiger, 1984). These findings suggest that there is functional diversity in light-dependent stomatal response in different lineages of land plants. In accord with this notion, the different sensitivities of stomatal response to abscisic acid and CO₂ have been reported among the plant species of angiosperm, gymnosperm, ferns, and lycophytes (Mansfield and Willmer, 1969; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011), although the exact responsiveness to abscisic acid and CO₂ is still debated (Chater et al., 2011, 2013; Ruszala et al., 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013).To address the origin and distribution of stomatal light responses, we investigated the presence of a stomatal response using a gas exchange method and various lineages of vascular plants, including euphyllophytes and lycophytes. Unexpectedly, all plant lineages except Polypodiopsida in monilophytes exhibited a stomatal response to BL in the presence of RL, suggesting that the response was present in the early evolutionary stage of vascular plants. We also report the stomatal opening in response to RL in these plant species.     

Multiscale Metabolic Modeling: Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis on a Whole-Plant Scale

Plant metabolism is characterized by a unique complexity on the cellular, tissue, and organ levels. On a whole-plant scale, changing source and sink relations accompanying plant development add another level of complexity to metabolism. With the aim of achieving a spatiotemporal resolution of source-sink interactions in crop plant metabolism, a multiscale metabolic modeling (MMM) approach was applied that integrates static organ-specific models with a whole-plant dynamic model. Allowing for a dynamic flux balance analysis on a whole-plant scale, the MMM approach was used to decipher the metabolic behavior of source and sink organs during the generative phase of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) plant. It reveals a sink-to-source shift of the barley stem caused by the senescence-related decrease in leaf source capacity, which is not sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of sink organs such as the growing seed. The MMM platform represents a novel approach for the in silico analysis of metabolism on a whole-plant level, allowing for a systemic, spatiotemporally resolved understanding of metabolic processes involved in carbon partitioning, thus providing a novel tool for studying yield stability and crop improvement.Plants are of vital significance as a source of food (Grusak and DellaPenna, 1999; Rogalski and Carrer, 2011), feed (Lu et al., 2011), energy (Tilman et al., 2006; Parmar et al., 2011), and feedstocks for the chemical industry (Metzger and Bornscheuer, 2006; Kinghorn et al., 2011). Given the close connection between plant metabolism and the usability of plant products, there is a growing interest in understanding and predicting the behavior and regulation of plant metabolic processes. In order to increase crop quality and yield, there is a need for methods guiding the rational redesign of the plant metabolic network (Schwender, 2009).Mathematical modeling of plant metabolism offers new approaches to understand, predict, and modify complex plant metabolic processes. In plant research, the issue of metabolic modeling is constantly gaining attention, and different modeling approaches applied to plant metabolism exist, ranging from highly detailed quantitative to less complex qualitative approaches (for review, see Giersch, 2000; Morgan and Rhodes, 2002; Poolman et al., 2004; Rios-Estepa and Lange, 2007).A widely used modeling approach is flux balance analysis (FBA), which allows the prediction of metabolic capabilities and steady-state fluxes under different environmental and genetic backgrounds using (non)linear optimization (Orth et al., 2010). Assuming steady-state conditions, FBA has the advantage of not requiring the knowledge of kinetic parameters and, therefore, can be applied to model detailed, large-scale systems. In recent years, the FBA approach has been applied to several different plant species, such as maize (Zea mays; Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Saha et al., 2011), barley (Hordeum vulgare; Grafahrend-Belau et al., 2009b; Melkus et al., 2011; Rolletschek et al., 2011), rice (Oryza sativa; Lakshmanan et al., 2013), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Poolman et al., 2009; de Oliveira Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Radrich et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2010; Mintz-Oron et al., 2012; Cheung et al., 2013), and rapeseed (Brassica napus; Hay and Schwender, 2011a, 2011b; Pilalis et al., 2011), as well as algae (Boyle and Morgan, 2009; Cogne et al., 2011; Dal’Molin et al., 2011) and photoautotrophic bacteria (Knoop et al., 2010; Montagud et al., 2010; Boyle and Morgan, 2011). These models have been used to study different aspects of metabolism, including the prediction of optimal metabolic yields and energy efficiencies (Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Boyle and Morgan, 2011), changes in flux under different environmental and genetic backgrounds (Grafahrend-Belau et al., 2009b; Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Melkus et al., 2011), and nonintuitive metabolic pathways that merit subsequent experimental investigations (Poolman et al., 2009; Knoop et al., 2010; Rolletschek et al., 2011). Although FBA of plant metabolic models was shown to be capable of reproducing experimentally determined flux distributions (Williams et al., 2010; Hay and Schwender, 2011b) and generating new insights into metabolic behavior, capacities, and efficiencies (Sweetlove and Ratcliffe, 2011), challenges remain to advance the utility and predictive power of the models.Given that many plant metabolic functions are based on interactions between different subcellular compartments, cell types, tissues, and organs, the reconstruction of organ-specific models and the integration of these models into interacting multiorgan and/or whole-plant models is a prerequisite to get insight into complex plant metabolic processes organized on a whole-plant scale (e.g. source-sink interactions). Almost all FBA models of plant metabolism are restricted to one cell type (Boyle and Morgan, 2009; Knoop et al., 2010; Montagud et al., 2010; Cogne et al., 2011; Dal’Molin et al., 2011), one tissue or one organ (Grafahrend-Belau et al., 2009b; Hay and Schwender, 2011a, 2011b; Pilalis et al., 2011; Mintz-Oron et al., 2012), and only one model exists taking into account the interaction between two cell types by specifying the interaction between mesophyll and bundle sheath cells in C4 photosynthesis (Dal’Molin et al., 2010). So far, no model representing metabolism at the whole-plant scale exists.Considering whole-plant metabolism raises the problem of taking into account temporal and environmental changes in metabolism during plant development and growth. Although classical static FBA is unable to predict the dynamics of metabolic processes, as the network analysis is based on steady-state solutions, time-dependent processes can be taken into account by extending the classical static FBA to a dynamic flux balance analysis (dFBA), as proposed by Mahadevan et al. (2002). The static (SOA) and dynamic optimization approaches introduced in this work provide a framework for analyzing the transience of metabolism by integrating kinetic expressions to dynamically constrain exchange fluxes. Due to the requirement of knowing or estimating a large number of kinetic parameters, so far dFBA has only been applied to a plant metabolic model once, to study the photosynthetic metabolism in the chloroplasts of C3 plants by a simplified model of five biochemical reactions (Luo et al., 2009). Integrating a dynamic model into a static FBA model is an alternative approach to perform dFBA.In this study, a multiscale metabolic modeling (MMM) approach was applied with the aim of achieving a spatiotemporal resolution of cereal crop plant metabolism. To provide a framework for the in silico analysis of the metabolic dynamics of barley on a whole-plant scale, the MMM approach integrates a static multiorgan FBA model and a dynamic whole-plant multiscale functional plant model (FPM) to perform dFBA. The performance of the novel whole-plant MMM approach was tested by studying source-sink interactions during the seed developmental phase of barley plants.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.