CYP72B1基因和AUR3基因响应光、生长素和油菜素内酯的转录调控机制研究

为研究光、生长素和油菜素内酯在基因层次上的互作机制,开发了转录调控元件识别工具OCMMat,其中,在对共表达基因信息和直系同源基因信息进行整合时,利用了转录调控元件在直系同源基因启动子中的富集性.利用该方法发现,CYP7281基因和AUR3基因启动子含有3个相同的调控模序GAGACA、AAGAAAAA、ATCATG,它们分别承担了AuxRE元件、GT元件和GT辅助元件的功能.其中,ATCATG模序是目前尚未报道过的调控元件,与AAGAAAAA模序的距离相对恒定.基于调控元件识别结果,构建了CYP7281基因和AUR3基因响应光、生长素和油菜素内酯的转录调控模型,模型显示:光信号和生长素、油菜素内酯信号在CYP72B1基因和AUR3基因的转录调控元件上相互交叠,而生长素和油菜素内酯信号则在转录因子ARF水平上相交.     

Characterization of CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS AND DWARFISM Homologs in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

To enhance our understanding of brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis in rice, we attempted to identify putative rice homologs of Arabidopsis CYP90A1/ CPD and related mutants. Two candidate genes, designated CYP90A3/OsCPD1 and CYP90A4/OsCPD2, are located on chromosomes 11 (2.0 cM) and 12 (1.9 cM), respectively. Based on sequence similarity with the Arabidopsis CYP90A1/CPD gene, we predict that the CYP90A3/OsCPD1 and CYP90A4/OsCPD2 gene products function as C-23α hydroxylases in the BR biosynthesis pathway. Both are broadly expressed in wild-type rice, and their expression is regulated by a feedback mechanism. A retrotransposon insertion mutant of CYP90A3/OsCPD1, oscpd1-1, did not produce any BR-deficient phenotype or feedback upregulation of genes for BR biosynthesis enzymes. These results indicate that if, as predicted, the CYP90A3/OsCPD1 and CYP90A4/OsCPD2 genes do function in the BR biosynthesis pathway, they may each have enough capacity to catalyze BR biosynthesis on their own. As a consequence, the oscpd1-1 mutant may not be deficient in endogenous BRs. Interestingly, BR biosynthesis enzymes except C-6 oxidase are encoded by plural genes in rice but by single genes in Arabidopsis (again, except C-6 oxidase). On the basis of these findings, we discuss the differences in BR biosynthesis between rice and Arabidopsis.     

Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor

Sorghum, a C4 model plant, has been studied to develop an understanding of the molecular mechanism of resistance to stress. The auxin-response genes, auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA), auxin-response factor (ARF), Gretchen Hagen3 (GH3), small auxin-up RNAs, and lateral organ boundaries (LBD), are involved in growth/development and stress/defense responses in Arabidopsis and rice, but they have not been studied in sorghum. In the present paper, the chromosome distribution, gene duplication, promoters, intron/exon, and phylogenic relationships of Aux/IAA, ARF, GH3, and LBD genes in sorghum are presented. Furthermore, real-time PCR analysis demonstrated these genes are differently expressed in leaf/root of sorghum and indicated the expression profile of these gene families under IAA, brassinosteroid (BR), salt, and drought treatments. The SbGH3 and SbLBD genes, expressed in low level under natural condition, were highly induced by salt and drought stress consistent with their products being involved in both abiotic stresses. Three genes, SbIAA1, SbGH3-13, and SbLBD32, were highly induced under all the four treatments, IAA, BR, salt, and drought. The analysis provided new evidence for role of auxin in stress response, implied there are cross talk between auxin, BR and abiotic stress signaling pathways.     

RLF,a cytochrome b5‐like heme/steroid binding domain protein,controls lateral root formation independently of ARF7/19‐mediated auxin signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana

Lateral root (LR) formation is important for the establishment of root architecture in higher plants. Recent studies have revealed that LR formation is regulated by an auxin signaling pathway that depends on auxin response factors ARF7 and ARF19, and auxin/indole‐3‐acetic acid (Aux/IAA) proteins including SOLITARY‐ROOT (SLR)/IAA14. To understand the molecular mechanisms of LR formation, we isolated a recessive mutant rlf (reduced lateral root formation) in Arabidopsis thaliana. The rlf‐1 mutant showed reduction of not only emerged LRs but also LR primordia. Analyses using cell‐cycle markers indicated that the rlf‐1 mutation inhibits the first pericycle cell divisions involved in LR initiation. The rlf‐1 mutation did not affect auxin‐induced root growth inhibition but did affect LR formation over a wide range of auxin concentrations. However, the rlf‐1 mutation had almost no effect on auxin‐inducible expression of LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES‐DOMAIN16/ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2‐LIKE18 (LBD16/ASL18) and LBD29/ASL16 genes, which are downstream targets of ARF7/19 for LR formation. These results indicate that ARF7/19‐mediated auxin signaling is not blocked by the rlf‐1 mutation. We found that the RLF gene encodes At5g09680, a protein with a cytochrome b₅‐like heme/steroid binding domain. RLF is ubiquitously expressed in almost all organs, and the protein localizes in the cytosol. These results, together with analysis of the genetic interaction between the rlf‐1 and arf7/19 mutations, indicate that RLF is a cytosolic protein that positively controls the early cell divisions involved in LR initiation, independent of ARF7/19‐mediated auxin signaling.     

The plant beneficial rhizobacterium Achromobacter sp. 5B1 influences root development through auxin signaling and redistribution

Roots provide physical and nutritional support to plant organs that are above ground and play critical roles for adaptation via intricate movements and growth patterns. Through screening the effects of bacterial isolates from roots of halophyte Mesquite (Prosopis sp.) on Arabidopsis thaliana, we identified Achromobacter sp. 5B1 as a probiotic bacterium that influences plant functional traits. Detailed genetic and architectural analyses in Arabidopsis grown in vitro and in soil, cell division measurements, auxin transport and response gene expression and brefeldin A treatments demonstrated that root colonization with Achromobacter sp. 5B1 changes the growth and branching patterns of roots, which were related to auxin perception and redistribution. Expression analysis of auxin transport and signaling revealed a redistribution of auxin within the primary root tip of wild‐type seedlings by Achromobacter sp. 5B1 that is disrupted by brefeldin A and correlates with repression of auxin transporters PIN1 and PIN7 in root provasculature, and PIN2 in the epidermis and cortex of the root tip, whereas expression of PIN3 was enhanced in the columella. In seedlings harboring AUX1, EIR1, AXR1, ARF7ARF19, TIR1AFB2AFB3 single, double or triple loss‐of‐function mutations, or in a dominant (gain‐of‐function) mutant of SLR1, the bacterium caused primary roots to form supercoils that are devoid of lateral roots. The changes in growth and root architecture elicited by the bacterium helped Arabidopsis seedlings to resist salt stress better. Thus, Achromobacter sp. 5B1 fine tunes both root movements and the auxin response, which may be important for plant growth and environmental adaptation.     

DWARF4 accumulation in root tips is enhanced via blue light perception by cryptochromes

Brassinosteroid (BR) signalling is known to be coordinated with light signalling in above ground tissue. Many studies focusing on the shade avoidance response in above ground tissue or hypocotyl elongation in darkness have revealed the contribution of the BR signalling pathway to these processes. We previously analysed the expression of DWARF 4 (DWF4), a key BR biosynthesis enzyme, and revealed that light perception in above ground tissues triggered DWF4 accumulation in root tips. To determine the required wavelength of light and photoreceptors responsible for this regulation, we studied DWF4‐GUS marker plants grown in several monochromatic light conditions. We revealed that monochromatic blue LED light could induce DWF4 accumulation in primary root tips and root growth as much as white light, whereas monochromatic red LED could not. Consistent with this, a cryptochrome1/2 double mutant showed retarded root growth under white light whereas a phytochromeA/B double mutant did not. Taken together, our data strongly indicated that blue light signalling was important for DWF4 accumulation in root tips and root growth. Furthermore, DWF4 accumulation patterns in primary root tips were not altered by auxin or sugar treatment. Therefore, we hypothesize that blue light signalling from the shoot tissue is different from auxin and sugar signalling.