Challenges to understand plant responses to wind

Understanding plant response to wind is complicated as this factor entails not only mechanical stress, but also affects leaf microclimate. In a recent study, we found that plant responses to mechanical stress (MS) may be different and even in the opposite direction to those of wind. MS-treated Plantago major plants produced thinner more elongated leaves while those in wind did the opposite. The latter can be associated with the drying effect of wind as is further supported by data on petiole anatomy presented here. These results indicate that plant responses to wind will depend on the extent of water stress. It should also be recognized that the responses to wind may differ between different parts of a plant and between plant species. Physiological research on wind responses should thus focus on the signal sensing and transduction of both the mechanical and drought signals associated with wind, and consider both plant size and architecture.Key words: biomechanics, leaf anatomy, phenotypic plasticity, plant architecture, signal transduction thigmomorphogenesis, windWind is one of the most ubiquitous environmental stresses, and can strongly affect development, growth and reproductive yield in terrestrial plants.^1–3 In spite of more than two centuries of research,⁴ plant responses to wind and their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This is because plant responses to mechanical movement themselves are complicated and also because wind entails not only mechanical effects, but also changes in leaf gas and heat exchange.^5–7 Much research on wind has focused primarily on its mechanical effect. Notably, several studies that determine plant responses to mechanical treatments such as flexing, implicitly extrapolate their results to wind effects.^8–10 Our recent study¹¹ showed that this may lead to errors as responses to wind and mechanical stimuli (in our case brushing) can be different and even in the opposite direction. In this paper, we first separately discuss plant responses to mechanical stimuli, and other wind-associated effects, and then discuss future challenges for the understanding of plant responses to wind.It is often believed that responses to mechanical stress (thigmomorphogenesis) entail the production of thicker and stronger plant structures that resist larger forces. This may be true for continuous unidirectional forces such as gravity, however for variable external forces (such as wind loading or periodic flooding) avoiding such mechanical stress by flexible and easily reconfigurable structures can be an alternative strategy.^12–14 How plants adapt or acclimate to such variable external forces depends on the intensity and frequency of stress and also on plant structures. Reduced height growth is the most common response to mechanical stimuli.^15,16 This is partly because such short stature increases the ability of plants to both resist forces (e.g., real-locating biomass for radial growth rather than elongation growth), and because small plants experience smaller drag forces (Fig. 1). Some plant species show a resistance strategy in response to mechanical stress by increasing stem thickness^1,10 and tissue strength.⁷ But other species show an avoidance strategy by a reduction in stem or petiole thickness and flexural rigidity in response to MS.^11,15–18 These different strategies might be associated with plant size and structure. Stems of larger plants such as trees and tall herbs are restricted in the ability to bend as they carry heavy loads^7,10,19 (Fig. 1). Conversely short plants are less restricted in this respect and may also be prone to trampling for which stress-avoidance would be the only viable strategy.^18,20 Systematic understanding of these various responses to mechanical stress remains to be achieved.Open in a separate windowFigure 1A graphical representation of how wind effects can be considered to entail both a drying and a mechanical effect. Adaptation or acclimation to the latter can be through a force resistance strategy or a force avoidance strategy, the benefit of which may depend on the size and architecture of plants as well as the location of a given structure within a plant.Wind often enhances water stress by reducing leaf boundary layers and reduces plant temperature by transpiration cooling. The latter effect may be minor,¹¹ but the former could significantly affect plant development. Anten et al. (2010) compared phenotypic traits and growth of Plantago major that was grown under mechanical stimuli by brushing (MS) and wind in the factorial design. Both MS and wind treatments reduced growth and influenced allocation in a similar manner. MS plants, however, had more slender petioles and narrower leaf blades while wind exposed plants exhibited the opposite response having shorter and relatively thicker petioles and more round-shaped leaf blades. MS plants appeared to exhibit stress avoidance strategy while such responses could be compensated or overridden by water stress in wind exposure.¹¹ A further analysis of leaf petiole anatomy (Fig. 2) supports this view. The vascular fraction in the petiole cross-section was increased by wind but not by MS, suggesting that higher water transport was required under wind. Our results suggest that drying effect of wind can at least to some extent override its mechanical effect.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Representative images of petiole cross-sections of Plantago major grown in 45 days in continuous wind and/or mechanical stimuli (A–D). Petiole cross-section area (E) and vascular bundle fraction in the cross-section of petiole (F). mean + SD (n = 12) are shown. Significance levels of ANOVA; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, ns p > 0.05.Physiological knowledge on plant mechanoreception and signal transduction has been greatly increased during the last decades. Plants sense mechanical stimuli through membrane strain with stretch activated channels²¹ and/or through some linker molecules connecting the cell wall, plasma membrane and cytoskeleton.^4,22,23 This leads to a ubiquitous increase in intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration. The increased Ca²⁺ concentration is sensed by touch induced genes (TCHs),^24,25 which activates downstream transduction machineries including a range of signaling molecules and phytohormones, consequently altering physiological and developmental processes.²⁶ Extending this knowledge to understand plant phenotypic responses to wind however remains a challenge. As responses to wind have been found to differ among parts of a plant (e.g., terminal vs. basal stem) and also across species, physiological studies should be extended to the whole-plant as integrated system rather than focusing on specific tissue level. Furthermore to understand the general mechanism across species, it is required to study different species from different environmental conditions. Advances in bioinformatics, molecular and physiological research will facilitate cross-disciplinary studies to disentangle the complicated responses of plants to wind.     

Arabidopsis glutathione reductase 1 is dually targeted to peroxisomes and the cytosol

We recently established a proteome methodology for Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes and identified more than 90 putative novel proteins of the organelle. These proteins included glutathione reductase isoform 1 (GR1), a major enzyme of the antioxidative defense system that was previously reported to be cytosolic. In this follow-up study, we validated the proteome data by analyzing the in vivo subcellular targeting of GR1 and the function of its C-terminal tripeptide, TNL>, as a putative novel peroxisome targeting signal type 1 (PTS1). The full-length protein was targeted to peroxisomes in onion epidermal cells when fused N-terminally with the reporter protein. The efficiency of peroxisome targeting, however, was weak upon expression from a strong promoter, consistent with the idea that the enzyme is dually targeted to peroxisomes and the cytosol in vivo. The reporter protein that was extended C-terminally by 10 amino acid residues of GR1 was directed to peroxisomes, characterizing TNL> as a novel PTS1. The data thus identify plant peroxisomal GR at the molecular level in the first plant species and complete the plant peroxisomal ascorbate-glutathione cycle. Moreover, GR1 is the first plant protein that is dually targeted to peroxisomes and the cytosol. The evolutionary origin and regulatory mechanisms of dual targeting are discussed.Key words: ascorbate-glutathione cycle, dual targeting, proteome analyses, reactive oxygen species, targeting signalsMassive amounts of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) are produced during photosynthesis in peroxisomes by glycolate oxidase activity as part of the photorespiratory cycle.¹ Next to catalase, the ascorbate-glutathione cycle is the secondary scavenging system for H₂O₂ detoxification.^2–4 The cycle comprises four enzymes, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase (GR). GR plays a major physiological role in maintaining and regenerating reduced glutathione in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants.⁵ Jiminez et al. (1997) provided biochemical evidence for the presence of the antioxidants ascorbate and glutathione and the enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in pea peroxisomes.^6–8 While Arabidopsis APX3, MDAR1 and MDAR4 have been characterized as peroxisomal isoforms,^9–11 the molecular identity of plant peroxisomal GR and DHAR have not been determined in any plant species to date.⁵ Arabidopsis encodes two GR and five DHAR isoforms that are either shown to be or predicted to be cytosolic, mitochondrial or plastidic.¹² We recently identified specific isoforms of GR (GR1, At3g24170) and DHAR (DHAR1, At1g19570) as being peroxisome-associated by proteome analysis of Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes.^13,14 Both isoforms were previously reported to be or predicted to be cytosolic.¹⁵Arabidopsis GR1 terminates with TNL>, which is related to functional plant PTS1 tripeptides such as SNL> and ANL>.^16,17 Threonine (T), however, has not yet been described as an allowed residue at position −3 of PTS1s in any plant peroxisomal protein.¹⁶ Analysis of homologous plant proteins and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) shows that TNL> is generally highly conserved in putative plant GR1 orthologs (Fig. 1). A few other sequences terminate with related tripeptides, such TSL>, TTL>, NNL> and TKL>. Only a single EST (Picrorhiza kurrooa) carries the canonical PTS1, SKI> (Fig. 1). The data provide only weak additional support for peroxisome targeting of plant GR1 orthologs. However, GR homologs from green algae (chlorophyta) carry canonical PTS1 tripeptides, such as SKL> (Chlamydomonas, Volvox) and AKM> (Micromonas, Fig. 1, Suppl. Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Analysis of PTS1 conservation in plant GR1 homologs. Sequences of full-length protein (FLP) plant GR1 homologs or ESTs (“EST”) were identified by BLAST and phylogenetic analysis, aligned by ClustalX, and conserved residues were shaded by Genedoc. In addition to spermatophyta, homologs from bryophyta and chlorophyta were analyzed for PTS1 conservation. For a phylogenetic analysis of the full-length proteins, see also Supplementary Figure 1. The species abbreviations are as follows: Aa, Artemisia annua; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Bn, Brassica napus; Br, Brassica rapa; Ci, Cichorium intybus; Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Cs, Cynara scolymus; Fv, Fragaria vesca; Ha, Helianthus annuus; Msp, Micromonas sp. RCC 299; Mt, Medicago truncatula; Nt, Nicotiana tabacum; Os, Oryza sativa; Pk, Picrorhiza kurrooa; Ppat, Physcomitrella patens subsp. patens; Ps, Pisum sativum; Ptri, Populus trichocarpa; Rc, Ricinus communis; Rs, Raphanus sativus; Tp, Trifolium pratense; Tpus, Triphysaria pusilla; Vc, Volvox carteri f. nagariensis; Vv, Vitis vinifera; Zm, Zea mays.     

Thigmomorphogenesis in Solanum lycopersicum: Morphological and biochemical responses in stem after mechanical stimulation

The activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in plants by environmental stimuli is one of the most universal biochemical stress responses known. In tomato plant, rubbing applied to a young internode inhibit elongation of the rubbed internode and his neighboring one. These morphological changes were correlated with an increase in lignification enzyme activities, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and peroxidases (POD), 24 hours after rubbing of the forth internode. Furthermore, a decrease in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content was detected in the rubbed internode and the upper one. Taken together, our results suggest that decrease in rubbed internode length is a consequence of IAA oxidation, increases in enzyme activities (PAL, CAD and POD), and cell wall rigidification associated with induction of lignification process.Key words: Mechanical stimulation, PAL, CAD, POD, IAAIn their environment, plants are constantly submitted to several stimuli such as wind, rain and wounding. The growth response of plants to such stimuli was termed thigmomorphogenesis and was observed in a wide range of plants.^1–3 The most common thigmomorphogenetic response is a retardation of tissue elongation accompanied by an increase in thickness.⁴ The plant response to mechanical perturbation is mainly restricted to the young developing internode, since no influence can be detected when the internode has reached its final length.^5,6 These plant growth modifications, which characterize thigmomorphogenesis, are related to biochemical events associated with lignification process⁷ and ethylene production.^8,9In tomato plant the length of internodes 4 (N4) and 5 (N5) was measured 14 days after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in Figure 1 show that rubbing led to a significant reduction of elongation of the stressed internode (N4) (decrease of N4 length from 4.3 cm in the control plant to 2.9 in the rubbed one). This effect was not limited to the rubbed area but affected also the elongation of the neighboring internodes (N5) that were shorter in rubbed plants than in control ones.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Internode lengths of control and rubbed plants measured 14 day after mechanical stress applied to the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Results reported in Figure 2 show an increase in PAL activity in both internodes N4 and N5, 24 hours after mechanical stress application as compared with corresponding controls. CAD activity was also investigated in N4 and N5, 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results presented in Figure 3 show that mechanical stress application induces a strong increase of CAD activity in the rubbed internode N4 (5.3 nkatal μg-1 protein) with an approximately two-fold increase when compared to control tomato internodes (2.3 nkatal μg-1 protein). Further, CAD activity in N5 was also increased in the rubbed internode (5.538 nkatal μg-1 protein) as compared with the control one (3.256 nkatal μg-1 protein).Open in a separate windowFigure 2PAL activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Open in a separate windowFigure 3CAD activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Syringaldazine (S-POD) and gaïacol (G-POD) peroxidase activities were measured in tomato N4 and N5. Results reported in Figure 4 show an increase in soluble peroxidase activity with both substrates in the rubbed internode N4 as compared with control plant. Enhancement in peroxidase activities in N4 was more pronounced with gaïacol (80.7 U) as an electron donor than syringaldazine (33.8 U). Similar results were observed in internode 5 as compared with control one (Fig. 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4(A) Syringaldazine-POD (Syr-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars. (B) Gaiacol-POD (G-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.IAA was quantified in control and rubbed plant internodes 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in figure 5 show that in control sample and as expected, the content of IAA was found to be higher in the younger internode (N5) as compared to the older one (N4). Rubbing led to a significant decrease in IAA levels in N4 (5.06 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹) as compared with corresponding controls (7.27 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹). Similar results were observed in internode 5, where IAA content was reduced from 16.52 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in control internode to 12.35 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in the rubbed internode (Fig. 5).Open in a separate windowFigure 5IAA Level of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.The results reported here establish an evident correlation between growth limitation of the rubbed internode and their degree of lignification, the increase in lignification enzymes activities and auxin degradation after mechanical stress application.Auxin seems to be involved in thigmomorphogenesis.¹⁰ It was proposed that MIS (Mechanically-induced stress) has opposite effects on auxin levels in the two species studied to date, Phaseolus vulgaris¹⁰ and Bryonia dioica.^11,12 Auxin level as measured by bioassay, increased in Phaseolus vulgaris following rubbing of the stem.¹⁰ It was proposed that a build up of auxin may result from the reduced polar transport of IAA at the rubbed internode, causing a build up of IAA in the stem tissue. Exogenous IAA did not reverse the MIS inhibition of growth in Phaseolus vulgaris and high levels of IAA retarded growth in non-stressed plants.¹⁰ Thus, retardation of extension growth in Phaseolus vulgaris may have been caused by high levels of endogenous auxin and the increase in stem diameter by increased ethylene production.⁴ However, ethylene increases radial growth only if auxin is present.¹³Boyer¹¹ reported a decrease in auxinlike activity in Bryonia dioica following MIS and this was confirmed in the same species by Hofinger et al.¹² who reported a decrease in IAA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Auxin catabolism was accompanied with changes in both soluble and ionically bound cell wall basic peroxidases¹⁴ and the appearance of an additional peroxidase. This can suggest that in Bryonia, auxin catabolism is hastened by mechanical stimulated peroxidase. In addition, Boyer et al.¹⁵ reported that lithium pre-treatment prevents both thigmomorphogenesis and appearance of specific cathodic isoperoxidase in Bryonia plants subjected to MIS. This is give further credence to the possibility that the peroxidase-auxin system is involved in Bryonia thigmomorphogenesis. In addition, ethylene increases peroxidase activity which reduces the auxin content in the tissue to a level low enough not to support normal growth. We have evidence that decrease of auxin level contribute to mechanism leading to tomato internode inhibition subjected to mechanical stress.Growth inhibition has been suggested to be the result of tissues lignification.⁶ As the initial enzyme in the monolignol biosynthesis pathway, PAL has a direct influence on lignin accumulation.¹⁶ The characteristics of lignin differ among cell wall tissues and plant organs.¹⁷ It comprises polyphenolic polymers derived from the oxidative polymerization of different monolignols, including p-coumaryl, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols via a side pathway of phenylalanine metabolism leading to lignin synthesis.¹⁸ The increase in lignin content in the rubbed tomato internode could be a response mechanism to mechanical damage caused by rubbing.³ It is known that plants create a natural barrier that includes lignin and suberin synthesis, components directly linked to support systems.^19,20The increase in lignin content of rubbed tomato internode³ is paralleled by a rise in CAD activity and whilst such direct proportionality between CAD activity and lignin accumulation does not always agree with the results in the literature, it clearly is responding in ways similar to those of the other enzymes in the pathway.²¹Mechanical stress-induced membrane depolarization would generate different species of free radicals and peroxides, which in turn initiate lipid peroxidation.²² The degradation of cell membranes is suggested to bring about rapid changes in ionic flux, especially release of K⁺ which would result in an enhanced endogenous Ca/K ratio and in leakage of solutes, among them electron donors such as ascorbic acid and phenolic substances. The increased intracellular relative calcium level activated secretion of basic peroxidases²³ into the free space where, in association with the electron donors and may be with the circulating IAA, they eliminate the peroxides, and facilitated binding of basic peroxidases to membrane structures allowing a role as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-oxidases. The resulting IAA and ACC oxidase-mediated changes in ethylene production²⁴ would further induce (this time through the protein synthesis machinery) an increase in activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and peroxidases. The resulting lignification and cell wall rigidification determines the growth response of tomato internode to the mechanical stress.     

Cross-talk between gibberellins and salicylic acid in early stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds

Salicylic acid (SA) is a plant hormone mainly associated with the induction of defense mechanism in plants, although in the last years there is increasing evidence on the role of SA in plant responses to abiotic stress. We recently reported that an increase in endogenous SA levels are able to counteract the inhibitory effects of several abiotic stress conditions during germination and seedling establishment of Arabidopsis thaliana and that this effect is modulated by gibberellins (GAs) probably through a member of the GASA (Giberellic Acid Stimulated in Arabidopsis) gene family, clearly showing the existence of a cross talk between these two plant hormones in Arabidopsis.Key words: abiotic stress responses, Arabidopsis thaliana, gibberellins, hormone cross-talk, salicylic acidGAs and SA play important roles in many processes of plant growth and development, and despite the recent papers reporting the existence of a complex network of hormone interactions, evidences of a cross talk between these two plant hormones have been very scarce.^1,2 These authors indicate that GAs are able to regulate SA biosynthesis during plant responses to pathogens. Interestingly, ABA has recently been proved to negative regulate SA-mediated defenses by downregulating SA biosynthesis.³ These data are consistent with the well known ABA/GAs antagonistic regulation of many aspects of plant development, such as seed dormancy or germination.^4,5 Thus, it seems clear that ABA and GAs are able to control plant immune responses by modulating the levels of salicylic acid and/or jasmonic acid.^1–3 In addition to the role of GAs in the regulation of plant responses to biotic stress, we have recently documented a role of GAs in early plant abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis through modulation of SA levels,⁶ hormone that been involved in responses to abiotic stress conditions.⁷ For instance, it has been proved that SA has an important role in heat stress responses⁸ or in the improved germination of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds under salt stress conditions.⁹We showed that GAs and the overexpression of a GA-responsive gene were able to increase not only endogenous levels of SA, but also the expression of ics1 and npr1 genes, involved in SA biosynthesis and action, respectively.⁶ In addition, we have also analyzed expression levels of other genes that have been reported as SA-regulated. For instance, isocitrate lyase, a key enzyme involved in lipid metabolism during seed germination¹⁰ and a good marker of seed vigor under stress conditions,¹¹ was found to be induced by SA in germinated seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana.⁹ Thus, we proved that the expression of isocitrate lyase was upregulated in GASA4 overexpressing lines, and after exogenous application of GA₃ (Fig. 1), both situations increasing endogenous SA levels.⁶ We have documented that SA may have a role in some of the physiological processes associated with GAs, since exogenous application of SA was able to both revert the inhibitory effect of PCB on seed germination and improve germination of the GA-deficient mutant ga1–3.⁶ Thus, we can hypothesize that the GA-mediated induction of isocitrate lyase gene observed in Arabidopsis thaliana is the result of the increased levels of SA detected either after overexpression of the GA-induced GASA4 gene in Arabidopsis or after exogenous application of gibberellic acid. In other words, GAs are able to induce the expression of isocitrate lyase gene in a SA-dependent manner, producing the establishment of a vigorous seedling.⁹ These data support the idea that GAs may have an important role in SA biosynthesis and action, and that some of the physiological effects of this hormone may be mediate by SA. In summary, our results clearly show the existence of a cross talk between these two plant hormones during Arabidopsis thaliana seeds germination and early seedling growth under abiotic stress conditions, showing another junction in the complex mechanism of hormone interactions.Open in a separate windowFigure 1(A) Expression of the isocitrate lyase gene in FsGASA-overexpressing plants (G1 to G3) compared to Col-0. (B) Expression of the isocitrate lyase gene in Arabidopsis seedlings treated or not with 100 µM GA₃. mRNA levels were determined by northern blot analysis using total RNAs (10 µg/line) isolated from 7 d-old seedlings. Bottom, ethidium bromide stained gels showing rRNAs. Top: quantification of hybridization signals obtained by using a phosphoimage scanner. Data were normalized to the rRNA value. Blots were repeated twice and yielded similar results.     

Plant encoded 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase activity implicated in different aspects of plant development

Proper plant development is dependent on the coordination and tight control of a wide variety of different signals. In the study of the plant hormone ethylene, control of the immediate biosynthetic precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) is of interest as the level of ethylene can either help or hinder plant growth during times of stress. It is known that ACC can be reversibly removed from the biosynthesis pathway through conjugation into other compounds. We recently reported that plants can also irreversibly remove ACC from ethylene production through the activity of a plant encoded ACC deaminase. Heretofore only found in bacteria, we showed that there was ACC deaminase activity in both Arabidopsis and in developing wood of poplar. Here we extend this original work and show that there is also ACC deaminase activity in tomato plants, and that this activity is regulated during tomato fruit development. Further, using an antisense construct of AtACD1 in Arabidopsis, we investigate the role of ACC deamination during salt stress. Together these studies shed light on a new level of control during ethylene production in a wide variety of plant species and during different plant developmental stages.Key words: tomato fruit ripening, wood development, stress response, hormone, antisense, synthesisHormones are a class of signaling molecules produced and sensed at very low levels; therefore control of their biosynthesis is crucial for proper plant development. The plant hormone ethylene has been studied for over a century and can positively impact plant development, such as in the initiation of fruit ripening, but ethylene accumulation can also induce widespread damage during stress responses.¹ Ethylene is produced in two steps from the S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) that is derived from the Yang cycle.² In the first committed step, SAM is converted into 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxcylic acid (ACC) via the action of ACC SYNTHASEs (ACSs).³ ACC is then converted into ethylene by ACC OXIDASEs (ACOs), a particular adaptation of flowering plants.⁴ Once ACC is produced, there are few proven pathways that can divert it from conversion into ethylene. ACC can be conjugated into malonyl-1-aminocyclopropane- 1-carboxylic acid (MACC) through the activity of ACC malonyl transferase⁵ or to 1-(γ-L-glutamyl-amino) cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (GACC) via γ-glutamyltranspeptidase.⁶ In bacteria, another pathway exists that can break down ACC obtained from plants through an irreversible deamination process.⁷ Through heterologous expression of bacterial ACC DEAMINASEs (ACDs) in plants it has been possible to engineer plants that have reduced production of ethylene by affecting the native pools of ACC.⁸ Until recently no ACC deaminase pathway has ever been proven in plants, although a number of different plant genomes encode genes which bear sequence homology to bacterial ACDs. Should these genes code for active ACDs, this would provide an additional level of control for ethylene production beyond the activity of ACSs and ACOs. Recently we reported that Arabidopsis and Populus have inherent ACC deaminase activity, and we showed that this activity in Arabidopsis is due, in part, to the product of ACC DEAMINASE1 (AtACD1) (At1g48420).⁹ This discovery raises many questions concerning the role of ACC deaminases during ethylene mediated processes in a number of different plant models. We report here some of our preliminary findings in the areas of tomato fruit ripening and salt stress in Arabidopsis.As precise control of ethylene levels is essential during climacteric fruit development, in parallel with our reported studies we also studied ACC deaminase activity in developing tomato fruit. Ethylene production during ripening in tomato is controlled by ethylene receptor turnover¹⁰ and conjugation of ACC by MACC and GACC.^6,11,12 We found that tomatoes also have inherent ACD activity, and that this activity varies over ripening of the fruit (Fig. 1; solid line). During the immature green stage in tomato development ACC deaminase activity was low. This activity increased significantly during the ‘late breaker’ stage, just prior to the orange/red stage of development, and then decreased during later stages of tomato ripening. Also shown in this figure are the predicted levels of ethylene during fruit development. It is interesting to note that the highest amount of ACC deaminase activity coincides with the drop in ethylene levels soon after the breaker stage (Fig. 1; dashed line; based on Brady¹³). Our data would suggest that, in addition to ethylene receptor turnover and GACC and MACC activity, ACC deaminase activity may also help control ethylene levels. It has already been shown that constitutive expression of a bacterial ACC deaminase in tomato can delay the rate of tomato fruit ripening by reduction of ethylene production.⁸ Although ACD activity is evident during ripening in tomato, the gene responsible has not been identified. Recently a tomato gene with sequence similarity to bacterial ACC deaminases was tested for ACD activity. It was found that, despite the close sequence similarity, this gene (accession number {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"EU639448","term_id":"186920268","term_text":"EU639448"}}EU639448) did not have ACD activity.¹⁴ Therefore, additional work must be done to isolate the gene responsible for the ACD activity we demonstrate in tomato fruit.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Tomato fruits exhibit AC deaminase activity during ripening. A plot of ACC Deaminase activity (Solid Line) with known levels of ethylene production during ripening (Dashed Line; Brady¹³) superimposed over pictures of the corresponding stage of tomato development. *Indicates significant increase in activity (†nmol mg⁻¹ hr⁻¹). AC deaminase activity analysis was performed on total tomato fruit protein as per Penrose and Glick (2003).²¹Our discovery of a plant encoded ACC deaminase in Arabidopsis allows us, for the first time, to downregulate ACC deaminase activity and investigate how this affects plant development. Previously, we showed that downregulation of AtACD1 using antisense resulted in up to a 30% reduction in ACD activity and up to a 2.5-fold increase in the evolution of ethylene.⁹ We showed that this difference in ACD activity was sufficient to alter hypocotyl elongation during Arabidopsis germination on different concentrations of ACC. It was unknown, however, if this difference was sufficient to affect other areas of development, such as stress response, in Arabidopsis. The expression of bacterial ACC deaminases in plants are known to increase plant resistance to a number of stressors due to decreased ethylene evolution.^15–18 Based on microarray data, it is known that AtACD1 expression is upregulated 150% during salt stress¹⁹ and functionally it has been demonstrated that ACC production is increased in salt stressed roots²⁰ and overexpression of bacterial ACDs in canola increases salt tolerance.¹⁸ It was unknown, however, if a reduction in native ACD activity would result in reduced vigour of plants grown on increasing concentrations of sodium chloride. We observed that there was no significant difference in rosette size, leaf production or percent dry weight between wildtype and three independent Arabidopsis lines expressing the AtACD1 antisense construct when grown on MS media without salt (Fig. 2A–C). As the concentration of salt increased in the growth media it was found that the antisense lines also did not differ from wildtype in their growth. The lack of a definitive phenotype under salt stress may mean that the level of reduced ACD activity achieved in the AtACD1 antisense lines was not sufficient to quantifiably affect the development of Arabidopsis. Additionally, as ethylene is not the only factor that affects a plant’s survival during times of salt stress, it is also possible that the plants were able to compensate for increased ethylene production in the AtACD1 antisense lines to promote normal plant development. This finding highlights the complex nature of the different signals involved in a plant’s response to salt stress and the need for a better understanding of the role of plant ACDs and how the plant may compensate for altered ACD activity.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Growth and development of Arabidopsis wildtype and three Antisense AtACD1 lines on increasing concentrations of salt. Stratified wildtype Arabidopsis (Col-0) and three independent transgenic lines expressing an antisense construct of AtACD1 (A1, A2, A3) were sown on 0 mM NaCl (Dark Grey Bars), 100 mM NaCl (White Bars), 125 mM NaCl (Black Bars) and 150 mM NaCl (Light Grey Bars) and allowed to germinate and grow for 2 weeks under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) at a light intensity of 130 to 190 µE m-2s⁻¹ at the rosette level at 21°C in Econair AC -60 growth chambers. Plants were analyzed for rosette diameter (A), leaf production (B) and percent dry weight (C). Error bars are ± SE.In the known framework of ethylene synthesis our work has shown that plants do have the ability to reduce ethylene synthesis by irreversibly deaminating ACC through the action of a native ACC deaminase. Further to our first study, we show here that there is inherent ACC deaminase activity in tomatoes and that this activity varies during tomato ripening in a manner consistent with a factor that is involved in the regulation of ethylene levels. We also show here that transgenic Arabidopsis lines with a mild reduction in ACD1 activity do not have an obvious affect on mediation of salt stress. This finding, however, does not preclude a role for ACD1 in mediating other aspects of plant development or in affecting plant development during other types of plant stress (i.e., drought). Therefore, there still remain many questions to answer concerning the role of plant encoded ACC deaminases and many exciting avenues of ethylene regulation to pursue. The identification and exploitation of tomato, poplar and other plant ACC deaminases could be used to alter fruit ripening, wood production and stress tolerance—all aspects of plant development that are economically and scientifically important.     

Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

Multiple signaling pathways control nitrogen-mediated root elongation in maize

Response of root system architecture to nutrient availability is an essential way for plants to adapt to soil environments. Nitrogen can affect root development either as a result of changes in the external concentration, or through changes in the internal nutrient status of the plant. Low soil N stimulates root elongation in maize. Recent evidence suggests that plant hormones auxin and cytokinin, as well as NO signaling pathway, are involved in the regulation of root elongation by low nitrogen nutrition.Key words: nitrogen, root growth, auxin, cytokinin, NONitrogen acquisition is determined by N demand for plant growth. At low N stress, N demand for maximum plant growth rate is not matched by plant N uptake. To acquire adequate N, plants may increase root length density to explore a larger soil volume and/or increase N uptake activity. High root density is also an important root trait for competition with soil microorganisms.¹ Since nitrate is a highly mobile, non-adsorbing ion, theoretic analysis predicts that its uptake is not limited by transport through soil, and a small root system is sufficient for nitrate acquisition.^2–4 In field conditions, however, genotypes that are efficient in N acquisition generally had a larger root system and higher root length density.^5,6 Under conditions of insufficient N supply, N mass flow to roots may not be adequate to meet the N demand for plant growth. Even in N-sufficient soils, various soil constraints (low water content, etc) may reduce the N mass flow rate. In these cases, large root size and high density will be very important for the utilization of the spatially distributed N, especially newly mineralized N, and the competition for organic N with soil microorganisms.^7,8The development of lateral roots in Arabidopsis in response to nitrate supply has been widely studied.⁹ Less attention has been paid to primary root growth in response to N, possibly because root elongtion is insensitive to increased N supply in Arabidopsis.^10,11 In maize, however, root elongation was sigificantly promoted by suboptimal N supply, and inhibited by overdose supply of N (Fig. 1).^12,13 Until recently less is known about the underlying physiological mechansms. It is well documented that cytokinin is a root-to-shoot signal communicating N availability in addition to nitrate itself.¹⁴ Exogenous cytokinin application suppresses the elongation of primary roots.¹⁵ Recent work in Arabidopsis overexpressing cytokinin synthase (IPT) demonstrate that long-term CK overproduction inhibited primary root elongation by reducing quantitative parameters of primary root meristem.¹⁶ By comparing two maize inbred lines whose root elongation had a differential response to low N stress, it was found that the change of cytokinin content in roots was closely related to low-N induced root elongation.¹³ In the N-sensitive genotype 478, cytokinin (Zeatin + Zeatin riboside) content was significantly lower at low N condition. While in N-insensitive genotype Wu312, cytokinin content was hardly affected at various N supplies. Higher N supply shortened the distance from root apex to the first visible lateral roots, a phenomenen similar to that caused by exogenous cytokinins. Furthermore, exogenous cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) completely reversed the stimulatory effect of low nitrate on root elongation. All the data suggests that the inhibitory effect of high concentration of nitrate on root elongation is, at least in part, mediated by increased cytokinin level in roots.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Root elongation is inhibited at high nitrate supply.Auxin regulates many cellular responses crucial for plant development. Auxin plays a key role in establishing and elaborating patterns in root meristems.^17,18 Root elongation of Arabidopsis is enhanced by exogenous auxin at low concentrations, but is inhibited at high concentrations.¹⁹ In an earlier report, a high external nitrate supply (8 mM) did cause a 70% decrease in the auxin concentration of the root in soybean.²⁰ In maize, inhibition of root growth by high nitrate was found closely related to the reduction of IAA levels in roots and exogenous NAA and IAA restored primary root growth in high nitrate concentrations.²¹ Interesting, it was found that auxin concentrations in phloem exudates were reduced by a greater nitrate supply, suggesting that shoot-to-root auxin transport may be inhibited by high N supply. Considering the antagonism between auxin and cytokinin.²² it was possible that, by increasing the cytokinin level and decreasing the auxin level, high nitrate supply may have negative influences on root apex activity so that root apical dominance is weakened and, therefore, root elongation is suppressed and lateral roots grow closer to the root apex.Nitric oxide (NO) is emerging as an important messenger molecule associated with many biochemical and physiological processes in plants. The involvement of NO in IAA-induced adventitious root development has also been reported.²³ Given that nitrate is a substrate for NR-catalysed NO production, and root development and growth are closely related to NO, it is expected that NO may play a role in nitrate-dependent root growth. Surprisingly, endogenous levels of NO in the root apices of maize seedlings grown in high nitrate solution were much lower than those in apices grown in low nitrate. The nitrate-induced inhibition of root elongation in maize was markedly reversed by treatments of the roots with a NO donor (SNP) and IAA.²⁴ These data suggest that the arrest of root elongation by high levels of external nitrate concentrations may result from an alteration of endogenous NO levels in root apical cells. NR mediated NO production is unlikely to be involved in the nitrate-dependent NO production and root elongation because NR activity is lower at low N supply. A NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor reduced root elongation in maize plants grown in the low-nitrate medium, suggest that NOS activity may be inhibited in plants grown in high-nitrate solution, thus leading to a reduction of the endogenous NO levels.Taken together, high nitrogen supply increases cytokinin level, but decreases auxin and NO levels in roots of maize. Besides, it was well documented ethylene has a negative effect on root elongation of various plants.^25–27 Exogenous supply of cytokinin increase ethylene production (Stenlid 1982; Bertell et al., 1990). Recently, it was demonstrated in Arabidopsis that auxin transport from the root apex via the lateral root cap is required for ethylene-mediated inhibition of root growth.²⁸ Therefore, a complex multiple siganlling pathways may be involved in N-mediated root elongation (Fig. 2). Further study is required to understand how these pathways interact with each other to reduce root elongation in response to high nitrate supply.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A simplified model explaining nitogen-mediated root elongation in maize.     

The Twisted Dwarf's ABC: How Immunophilins Regulate Auxin Transport

There is increasing evidence that immunophilins function as key regulators of plant development. One of the best investigated members, the multi-domain FKBP TWISTED DWARF1 (TWD1)/FKBP42, has been shown to reside on both the vacuolar and plasma membranes where it interacts in mirror image with two pairs of ABC transporters, MRP1/ MRP2 and PGP1/PGP19(MDR1), respectively. Twisted dwarf1 and pgp1/pgp19 mutants display strongly overlapping phenotypes, including reduction and disorientation of growth, suggesting functional interaction.In a recent work using plant and heterologous expression systems, TWD1 has been demonstrated to modulate PGP-mediated export of the plant hormone auxin, which controls virtually all plant developmental processes. Here we summarize recent molecular models on TWD1 function in plant development and PGP-mediated auxin tranport and discuss open questions.Key Words: Twisted Dwarf1, plant development, auxin, immunophilin, P-glycoprotein, ABC transporterFK506-binding Proteins (FKBPs), together with unrelated cyclophilins, belong to the immunophilins, an ancient and ubiquitous protein family.^1,4,5 They were first described as receptors for immunosuppressive drugs in animal and human cells, FK506 and cyclosporin A, respectively.¹ All FKBP-type immunophilins share a characteristic peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase domain (PPIase domain or FKBD, Fig. 2A) making protein folding a key feature among immunophilins.² The best investigated example, the human cytosolic single-domain FKBP12, modulates Ca²⁺ release channels^6,7 and associates with the cell cycle regulator TGF-β.⁸ Furthermore, the human FKBP12/FK506 complex is known to bind and inhibit calcineurin activity,⁹ leading to immune response inhibition. However, not all single- and multiple-domain FKBPs own folding activity and, interestingly, many form distinct protein complexes with diverse functions.^3–5Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model of TWISTED DWARF 1 interacting proteins. (A) Domain structure of TWD1 and putative interacting proteins. FKBD, FK506-binding domain: TPR, tetratricopeptide repeat; CaM(-BD, calmodulin-binding domain; MA, membrane anchor. For details, see text. (B) Functional TWD1-ABC transporter complexes on both the vacuolar and plasma membrane. While for TWD1/PGP pairs, the positive regulatory role on auxin transport was demonstrated,¹⁸ the modulation of MRP-mediated vacuolar import of glutathion conjugates (GS-X) was established using mammalian test substrates¹⁷ because the in vivo substrates are unknown. Note that C-terminal nucleotide binding folds of MRP- and PGP-like ABC transporters interact with distinct functional domains of TWD1, the TPR and FKBD, respectively. The native auxin, IAAH, gets trapped by deprotonization upon uptake into the cell. Export is catalyzed by secondary active export via PIN-like efflux carriers¹⁵ and/or by primary active, ATP-driven P-glycoproteins (PGPs, right panel); loss-of TWD1 function abolishes PGP-mediated auxin export (left panel).     

Flowering time regulation by the SUMO E3 ligase SIZ1

Flowering is a developmental process, which is influenced by chemical and environmental stimuli. Recently, our research established that the Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligase, AtSIZ1, is a negative regulator of transition to flowering through mechanisms that reduce salicylic acid (SA) accumulation and involve SUMO modification of FLOWERING LOCUS D (FLD). FLD is an autonomous pathway determinant that represses the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), a floral repressor. This addendum postulates mechanisms by which SIZ1-mediated SUMO conjugation regulates SA accumulation and FLD activity.Key words: SIZ1, SA, flowering, SUMO, FLD, FLCSUMO conjugation and deconjugation are post-translational processes implicated in plant defense against pathogens, abscisic acid (ABA) and phosphate (Pi) starvation signaling, development, and drought and temperature stress tolerance, albeit only a few of the modified proteins have been identified.^1–8 The Arabidopsis AtSIZ1 locus encodes a SUMO E3 ligase that regulates floral transition and leaf development.^8,9 siz1 plants accumulate substantial levels of SA, which is the primary cause for dwarfism and early short-day flowering exhibited by these plants.^1,9 How SA promotes transition to flowering is not yet known but apparently, it is through a mechanism that is independent of the known floral signaling pathways.^9,10 Exogenous SA reduces expression of AGAMOUS-like 15 (AGL15), a floral repressor that functions redundantly with AGL18.^11,12 A possible mechanism by which SA promotes transition to flowering may be by repressing expression of AGL15 and AGL18 (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Model of how SUMO conjugation and deconjugation regulate plant development in Arabidopsis. SIZ1 and Avr proteins regulate biosynthesis and accumulation of SA, a plant stress hormone that is involved in plant innate immunity, leaf development and regulation of flowering time. SA promotes transition to flowering may through AGL15/AGL18 dependent and independent pathways. FLC expression is activated by FRIGIDA but repressed by the autonomous pathway gene FLD, and SIZ1-mediated sumoylation of FLD represses its activity. Lines with arrows indicate upregulation (activation), and those with bars identify downregulation (repression).siz1 mutations also cause constitutive induction of pathogenesis-related protein genes leading to enhanced resistance against biotrophic pathogens.¹ Several bacterial type III effector proteins, such as YopJ, XopD and AvrXv4, have SUMO isopeptidase activity.^13–15 PopP2, a member of YopJ/AvrRxv bacterial type III effector protein family, physically interacts with the TIR-NBS-LRR type R protein RRS1, and possibly stabilizes the RRS1 protein.¹⁶ Phytopathogen effector and plant R protein interactions lead to increased SA biosynthesis and accumulation, which in turn activates expression of pathogenesis-related proteins that facilitate plant defense.¹⁷ SIZ1 may participate in SUMO conjugation of plant R proteins to regulate Avr and R protein interactions leading to SA accumulation, which, in turn, affects phenotypes such as diseases resistance, dwarfism and flowering time (Fig. 1).Our recent work revealed also that AtSIZ1 facilitates FLC expression, negatively regulating flowering.⁹ AtSIZ1 promotes FLC expression by repressing FLD activity.⁹ Site-specific mutations that prevent SUMO1/2 conjugation to FLD result in enhanced activity of the protein to represses FLC expression, which is associated with reduced acetylation of histone 4 (H4) in FLC chromatin.⁹ FLD, an Arabidopsis ortholog of Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1), is a floral activator that downregulates methylation of H3K4 in FLC chromatin and represses FLC expression.^18,19 Interestingly, bacteria expressing recombinant FLD protein did not demethylate H3K4me2, inferring that the demethylase activity requires additional co-factors as are necessary for LSD1.^18,20 Together, these results suggest that SIZ1-mediated SUMO modification of FLD may affect interactions between FLD and co-factors, which is necessary for FLC chromatin modification.Despite our results that implicate SA in flowering time control, how SIZ1 regulates SA accumulation and the identity of the effectors involved remain to be discovered. In addition, it remains to be determined if SIZ1 is involved in other mechanisms that modulate FLD activity and FLC expression, or the function of other autonomous pathway determinants.     

Increasing insight into induced plant defense mechanisms using elicitors and inhibitors

One of the strategies that plants employ to defend themselves against herbivore attack is the induced production of carnivore-attracting volatiles. Using elicitors and inhibitors of different steps of the signal-transduction pathways can improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying induced plant defenses. For instance, we recently showed that application of jasmonic acid, a key hormone in the octadecanoid pathway involved in herbivore-induced defense, to Brassica oleracea affects gene expression, hormone levels, and volatile emission, as well as oviposition by herbivores and host location behavior by parasitoids. Such defense responses vary with the dose of the elicitor and with time since application. This addendum describes how the use of inhibitors, in addition to the use of elicitors like jasmonic acid, can be applied in bio-assays to investigate the role of signal-transduction pathways involved in induced plant defense. We show how inhibition of different steps of the octadecanoid pathway affects host location behavior by parasitoids.Key words: Brassica oleracea, Cotesia glomerata, elicitor, herbivore-induced plant defense, inhibitor, jasmonic acid, octadecanoid pathway, phenidone, propyl gallate, diethyldithiocarbamic acid (DIECA)Chemical information plays an important role in the interactions between plants and insects. When a plant is damaged, it can respond with the production of specific volatiles and toxins.¹ Insects associated with these plants can use the resulting chemical information to find their host plants and to determine the suitability of a plant for feeding or oviposition. Application of chemicals acting as elicitors can be used to mimic such plant responses, while knowledge of the signal transduction pathways involved can be used to select potential inhibitors of induced plant response. Compared to exposing plants to herbivores, the application of elicitors and inhibitors allows for manipulation of defined steps in signal-transduction pathways, as well as to induce plants in a dose-controlled manner.² However, also with elicitors and inhibitors it is often difficult to link the applied dose to the strength of the induction of the plant, as the plant may use alternatives routes to express certain traits and the manipulation can result in unwanted effects on other processes in the plant, such as flowering or senescence.^3,4 Hence, experiments using elicitors or inhibitors should preferably use rather short incubation times (hours to days), to avoid developmental differences due to treatment.⁵JA is a key hormone in the octadecanoid pathway, involved in direct as well as indirect plant defenses against herbivores. Application of this phytohormone is known to mediate induction of volatile emission, increase toxin levels and to upregulate defense gene expression. In turn, the changes in these plant traits affect members of the insect community associated with the plant and may result in higher parasitism rates of herbivores, attraction of predators, and reduced oviposition and development of herbivores.^6–12JA is often used to mimic herbivory in studies on induced plant responses. However, recent studies on JA-application to e.g., Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera L. (Brussels sprouts) also indicate that the JA-induced volatile emission differs from volatile emission induced by herbivores.¹² More nectar was secreted by flowers of herbivore-infested Brassica nigra L. (black mustard) than by flowers from JA-induced plants.⁶ The intensity of the behavioral responses of herbivores and parasitoids differs between JA- and herbivore-induced plants, but compared to non-induced plants, both treatments are favored by parasitoids on both Brussels sprouts and black mustard plants,^6,12 while Pieris butterflies avoid oviposition on induced Brussels sprouts plants.¹¹ The results indicate that JA-mediated responses do play an important role in plant defense against herbivorous insects, and can be used to induce defense responses in many plant species. However, cross-talk with other phytohormones, as well as visual cues will also affect plant defense responses.While JA application induces the octadecanoid pathway, inhibitors of steps in this pathway are also available (Fig. 1). This approach allows including visual cues of feeding damage while eliminating or reducing chemical cues. Three inhibitors of different steps of the octadecanoid pathway are phenidone (1-phenyl-pyrazolidinone), DIECA (diethyldithiocarbamic acid) and n-propyl gallate (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid propyl ester; all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO; Fig. 1). The redox-active compound phenidone is known to inhibit the activity of lipoxygenases (LOXs),^13–15 by reducing the active form of LOX to an inactive form. Therefore, phenidone is an effective inhibitor of an early step in the octadecanoid pathway, and thus of the plant’s induced defense system.^16,17 DIECA reduces 13-hydroperoxylinolenic acid to its corresponding alcohol 13-hydroxylinolenic acid, which is not a signaling intermediate and cannot be converted into JA.^18–20 Propyl gallate is a less specific inhibitor inhibiting both LOX and allene oxide cyclase (AOC), an enzyme catalyzing the step to 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) in the octadecanoid pathway.^14,21,22 We investigated the effects of these three inhibitors on herbivore-induced parasitoid attraction. For all three inhibitors 2 mM aqueous solutions with 0.1% Tween were applied to the plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Representation of the octadecanoid pathway with indication of which step of the signal-transduction pathway is affected by the different elicitors (+) and inhibitors (−).The response of the parasitoid Cotesia glomerata was tested to Pieris brassicae-infested plants (15 2^nd instar larvae) treated with inhibitor solution, Pieris brassicae-infested plants treated with a solution without inhibitor or intact plants sprayed with inhibitor solution. Recently, Bruinsma et al.¹⁷ showed that Pieris brassicae- infested plants treated with phenidone were less attractive to C. glomerata than infested plants treated with control solution (binomial test, N = 42, p = 0.008, Fig. 2). However, infested plants treated with phenidone were still more attractive than intact plants sprayed with phenidone (binomial test, N = 39, p < 0.001, Fig. 2). Thus, phenidone did reduce the induction of parasitoid attractants, but did not eliminate the induction completely. Here, we present additional experiments with the inhibitors DIECA and propyl gallate. DIECA application shows similar results as phenidone application; infested plants treated with DIECA are less attractive to C. glomerata than infested plants treated with control solution, but are more attractive than uninfested plants treated with DIECA (binomial test, N = 46, p = 0.026 and N = 26, p < 0.001, respectively, Fig. 2). Treatment with propyl gallate resulted in lower attractiveness of infested inhibitor-treated plants compared to infested control plants, but not significantly so (binomial test, N = 45, p = 0.072, Fig. 2), and propyl gallate-treated infested plants were more attractive than propyl gallate-treated intact plants (binomial test, N = 28, p < 0.001; Fig. 2). Summarizing, phenidone and DIECA treatment of Brussels sprouts plants resulted in a reduced attractiveness of caterpillar-infested B. oleracea plants to C. glomerata. Although propyl gallate-treated plants also attracted fewer parasitoids, this difference was marginally insignificant. Of the three inhibitors, the LOX inhibitor phenidone had the largest effect on the attraction of the parasitoid C. glomerata.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Attraction of Cotesia glomerata to plants sprayed with the inhibitors phenidone, DIECA, or propyl gallate, or sprayed with a control solution, with or without infestation with Pieris brassicae. Numbers to the left of the bars indicate the total number of parasitoids tested, numbers between brackets the number of parasitoids that landed on a plant (binomial test, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).Our data show that both elicitors and inhibitors can be used in bio-assays to demonstrate the importance of certain steps in defense pathways.^5,23 Although application of the inhibitors to herbivore-infested plants did not abolish the response of the plants and the parasitoids still preferred them over non-induced plants, the inhibition of the octadecanoid pathway did reduce the attractiveness of the plants to the parasitoids. This implies that the octadecanoid pathway is involved in attracting parasitoids, but it is not the only factor determining parasitoid host location. This shows that use of inhibitors can provide interesting opportunities to comparatively investigate ecological interactions of genetically identical plants that differ in the degree of defense expression. Integrating knowledge on mechanisms with studies on ecological interactions and applying this to studies of increasingly complex interactions will further promote the understanding of induced defense in a community ecology context.^24,25     

Leaf carbohydrate metabolism during defense: Intracellular sucrose-cleaving enzymes do not compensate repression of cell wall invertase

The significance of cell wall invertase (cwINV) for plant defense was investigated by comparing wild type (wt) tobacco Nicotiana tabacum L. Samsun NN (SNN) with plants with RNA interference-mediated repression of cwINV (SNN::cwINV) during the interaction with the oomycetic phytopathogen Phytophthora nicotianae. We have previously shown that the transgenic plants developed normally under standard growth conditions, but exhibited weaker defense reactions in infected source leaves and were less tolerant to the pathogen. Here, we show that repression of cwINV was not accompanied by any compensatory activities of intracellular sucrose-cleaving enzymes such as vacuolar and alkaline/neutral invertases or sucrose synthase (SUSY), neither in uninfected controls nor during infection. In wt source leaves vacuolar invertase did not respond to infection, and the activity of alkaline/neutral invertases increased only slightly. SUSY however, was distinctly stimulated, in parallel to enhanced cwINV. In SNN::cwINV SUSY-activation was largely repressed upon infection. SUSY may serve to allocate sucrose into callose deposition and other carbohydrate-consuming defense reactions. Its activity, however, seems to be directly affected by cwINV and the related reflux of carbohydrates from the apoplast into the mesophyll cells.Key words: cell wall invertase, apoplastic invertase, alkaline invertase, neutral invertase, sucrose synthase, plant defense, Nicotiana tabacum, Phytophthora nicotianaePlant defense against pathogens is costly in terms of energy and carbohydrates.^1,2 Sucrose (Suc) and its cleavage products glucose and fructose are central molecules for metabolism and sensing in higher plants (reviewed in refs. ³ and ⁴). Rapid mobilization of these carbohydrates seems to be an important factor determining the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions. In particular in source cells reprogramming of the carbon flow from Suc to hexoses may be a crucial process during defense.^1,2There are two alternative routes of sucrolytic carbohydrate mobilization. One route is reversible and involves an uridine 5′-diphosphate (UDP)-dependent cleavage catalyzed by sucrose synthase (SUSY). Its activity is limited by the concentrations of Suc and UDP in the cytosol, as the affinity of the enzyme to its substrate is relatively low (K_m for Suc 40–200 mM). The other route is the irreversible, hydrolytic cleavage by invertases (INVs), which exhibit high affinity to Suc (K_m 7–15 mM).⁵Plants possess three different types of INV isoenzymes, which can be distinguished by their solubility, subcellular localization, pH-optima and isoelectric point. Usually, they are subdivided into cell wall (cwINV), vacuolar (vacINV), and alkaline/neutral (a/nINVs) INVs.cwINV, also referred to as extracellular or apoplastic INV, is characterized by a low pH-optimum (pH 3.5–5.0) and usually ionically bound to the cell wall. It is the key enzyme of the apoplastic phloem unloading pathway and plays a crucial role in the regulation of source/sink relations (reviewed in refs. ^{3, 6–8}). A specific role during plant defense has been suggested, based on observations that cwINV is often induced during various plant-pathogen interactions, and the finding that overexpression of a yeast INV in the apoplast increases plant resistance.^6,8–10 It was shown, that a rapid induction of cwINV is, indeed, one of the early defense-related reactions in resistant tobacco source leaves after infection with Phytophthora nicotianae (P. nicotianae).¹¹ Finally, the whole infection area in wt leaves was covered with hypersensitive lesions, indicating that all cells had undergone hypersensitive cell death (Fig. 1A).^1,11 When the activity of cwINV was repressed by an RNAi construct, defense-related processes were impaired, and the infection site exhibited only small spots of hypersensitive lesions. Finally, the pathogen was able to sporulate, indicating a reduced resistance of these transgenic plants (Fig. 1A).¹Open in a separate windowFigure 1Defense-induced changes in the activity of intracellular sucrose-cleaving enzymes and their contribution to defense. (A) The repression of cwINV in source leaves of tobacco leads to impaired pathogen resistance and can not be compensated by other sucrose-cleaving enzymes. The intensity of defense reactions is amongst others indicated by the extent of hypersensitive lesions. (B and C) Absolute activity of vacuolar (B) and alkaline/neutral (C) INVs at the infection site (white symbols, control; black symbols, infection site). (D) Increase in SUSY activity at the infection site. All data points taken from noninfected control parts of the plants in each individual experiment and each point along the time scale of an experiment are set as 0%. At least three independent infections are averaged and their means are presented as percentage changes ± SE (circles, SNN; triangles, SNN::cwINV). Insets show the means of the absolute amount of activities (white symbols, control; black symbols, infection site). Material and methods according to Essmann, et al.¹vacINV, also labeled as soluble acidic INV, is characterized by a pH optimum between pH 5.0–5.5. Among others it determines the level of Suc stored in the vacuole and generates hexose-based sugar signals (reviewed in refs. ³ and ¹²). Yet, no specific role of vacINV during pathogen response has been reported. Although vacINV and cwINV are glycoproteins with similar enzymatic and biochemical properties and share a high degree of overall sequence homology and two conserved amino acid motifs,⁴ the activity of vacINV in tobacco source leaves was not changed due to the repression of the cwINV (Fig. 1B).¹ After infection with P. nicotianae the activity of vacINV in wt SNN did not respond under conditions where cwINV was stimulated.¹ There was also no significant change in the transgenic SNN::cwINV (Fig. 1B). This suggests that during biotic stress, there is no crosstalk between the regulation of cwINV and vacINV.a/nINVs exhibit activity maxima between pH 6.5 and 8.0, are not glycosylated and thought to be exclusively localized in the cytosol. But recent reports also point to a subcellular location in mitochondria and chloroplasts.^13,14 Only a few a/nINVs have been cloned and characterized, and not much is known about their physiological functions (reviewed in refs. ^{4, 14} and ¹⁵). Among other things they seem to be involved in osmotic or low-temperature stress response.^14,15 During the interaction between tobacco and P. nicotianae the activity of a/nINVs rose on average 17% in the resistant wt SNN between 1 to 9 hours post infection (Fig. 1C). By contrast, in SNN::cwINV the a/nINVs activities remained unchanged in control leaves and even after infection (Fig. 1C). This suggests that the defense related stimulation in a/nINVs activities is rather a secondary phenomenon, possibly in response to the enhanced cwINV activity and the related carbohydrate availability in the cytosol.SUSY can be found as a soluble enzyme in the cytosol, bound to the inner side of the plasma membrane or the outer membrane of mitochondria, depending on the phosphorylation status. It channels hexoses into polysaccharide biosynthesis (i.e., starch, cellulose and callose) and respiration.^12,16 There is also evidence that SUSY improves the metabolic performance at low internal oxygen levels¹⁷ but little is known about its role during plant defense. Callose formation is presumably one of the strongest sink reactions in plant cells.^1,18 Defense-related SUSY activity may serve to allocate Suc into callose deposition and other carbohydrate-consuming defense reactions. In fact, in the resistant wt the activity of SUSY increased upon interaction with P. nicotianae in a biphasic manner (Fig. 1D). The time course is comparable to that of cwINV activity and correlates with callose deposition and enhanced respiration.^1,11 However, repression of cwINV leads in general to a reduction of SUSY activity in source leaves of tobacco.¹ After infection the activation of SUSY was also significantly impaired (Fig. 1D). At the same time, the early defense-related callose deposition in infected mesophyll cells of SNN::cwINV plants is substantially delayed.¹ It is known that expression of SUSY isoforms is differentially controlled by sugars,¹² and there is evidence that hexoses generated by the defense-induced cwINV activity deliver sugar signals to the infected cells.¹ In this sense, the reduction of defense-related, cwINV-generated sugar signals could be responsible for the repression of SUSY activity in SNN::cwINV plants after infection with P. nicotianae.Only limited hexoses or hexose-based sugar signals could be generated by cytoplasmic Suc cleavage.¹² The reduction of soluble carbohydrates for sugar signaling and also as fuel for metabolic pathways that support defense reactions could be responsible for the impaired resistance in SNN::cwINV plants (Fig. 1A).Obviously, neither intracellular INV isoforms, nor SUSY can compensate for the reduced carbohydrate availability due to cwINV repression during plant defense. The data also suggest that the activity of SUSY is affected by cwINV and related reflux of carbohydrates. It is known that SUSY activity can be controlled, e.g., by sugar-mediated phosphorylation¹² and one may speculate that posttranslational modulation of the protein is affected by the defense-related carbohydrate status of the cell.