On the mechanism of ribosomal frameshifting at hungry codons

In a few, rather rare cases, frameshift mutant alleles are phenotypically suppressed during limitation for particular aminoacyl-tRNA species. The simplest interpretation is compensatory ribosome frameshifting at a "hungry" codon in the vicinity of the suppressed frameshift mutation. We have now tested this interpretation directly by obtaining amino acid sequence data on such a phenotypically suppressed protein. We used a plasmid-borne lacZ gene, engineered to be in the (+) reading frame. Its background leakiness is increased by two orders of magnitude during lysyl-tRNA limitation. The enzyme made under this condition has the amino acid sequence expected from the DNA sequence up to the first lysine codon, then shifts in the (-) direction to recreate the correct lacZ reading frame. The lysine is replaced by serine, presumably due to cognate reading of an overlapping AGC codon displaced by one base to the 3' side of the AAG codon. When the 3' overlapping codon is AGA or AGG, there is no ribosome frameshifting; when it is AGU (read by the same serine tRNA) there is frameshifting, although less efficiently than in the case of AGC. The mechanism of cognate overlapping reading contradicts more elaborate models that two of the authors have suggested previously. However, the possibility remains that there is more than one mechanism of ribosome frameshifting at hungry codons.     

Context rules of rightward overlapping reading.

We have investigated the mechanism and sequence context rules governing ribosome frameshifting promoted by aminoacyl-tRNA limitation. In the case of one shifty sequence, frameshifting promoted by lysyl-tRNA limitation occurs at the sequence AAG C and is due to rightward movement of the ribosome so as to read the AGC triplet overlapping the hungry codon from the right. The frequency of this event is unaffected by sequence elements more than three bases to the left (upstream) or two bases to the right (downstream) of the hungry codon, and only slightly affected by the identity of the base two bases to the right. It is strongly affected by the base immediately to the right of the hungry codon, which becomes the wobble base of the shifted triplet; and by the third base of the hungry codon, even though the two synonyms (AAG and AAA) call for the same aminoacyl-tRNA; and by the identity of the base immediately to the left of the hungry codon. The latter result suggests that the aminoacyl-tRNA in the P site affects the maintenance of reading frame at the adjacent A site of the ribosome. However, the DNA sequence makes it seem unlikely that the P-site tRNA shifts to the right in concert with the A-site tRNA, a mechanism that can account for leftward frameshifting (in the opposite direction) in retroviral translation. The specificity of sequence determinants of leftwing versus rightwing frameshifting is discussed.     

Programmed +1 frameshifting stimulated by complementarity between a downstream mRNA sequence and an error-correcting region of rRNA

Like most retroviruses and retrotransposons, the retrotransposon Ty3 expresses its pol gene analog (POL3) as a translational fusion to the upstream gag analog (GAG3). The Gag3-Pol3 fusion occurs by frameshifting during translation of the mRNA that encodes the two separate but overlapping ORFs. We showed previously that the shift occurs by out-of-frame binding of a normal aminoacyl-tRNA in the ribosomal A site caused by an aberrant codonoanticodon interaction in the P site. This event is unlike all previously described programmed translational frameshifts because it does not require tRNA slippage between cognate or near-cognate codons in the mRNA. A sequence of 15 nt distal to the frameshift site stimulates frameshifting 7.5-fold. Here we show that the Ty3 stimulator acts as an unstructured region to stimulate frameshifting. Its function depends on strict spacing from the site of frameshifting. Finally, the stimulator increases frameshifting dependent on sense codon-induced pausing, but has no effect on frameshifting dependent on pauses induced by nonsense codons. Complementarity between the stimulator and a portion of the accuracy center of the ribosome, Helix 18, implies that the stimulator may directly disrupt error correction by the ribosome.     

Leftward ribosome frameshifting at a hungry codon.

Previous experiments have shown that limitation for certain aminoacyl-tRNA species results in phenotypic suppression of a subset of frameshift mutant alleles, including members in both the (+) and (-) incorrect reading frames. Here, we demonstrate that such phenotypic suppression can occur through a ribosome reading frame shift at a hungry AAG codon calling for lysyl-tRNA in short supply. Direct amino acid sequence analysis of the product and DNA sequence manipulation of the gene demonstrate that the ribosome frameshift occurs through a movement of one base to the left, so as to decode the triplet overlapping the hungry codon from the left or 5' side, followed by continued normal translation in the new, shifted reading frame.     

How translational accuracy influences reading frame maintenance

Most missense errors have little effect on protein function, since they only exchange one amino acid for another. However, processivity errors, frameshifting or premature termination result in a synthesis of an incomplete peptide. There may be a connection between missense and processivity errors, since processivity errors now appear to result from a second error occurring after recruitment of an errant aminoacyl-tRNA, either spontaneous dissociation causing premature termination or translational frameshifting. This is clearest in programmed translational frameshifting where the mRNA programs errant reading by a near-cognate tRNA; this error promotes a second frameshifting error (a dual-error model of frameshifting). The same mechanism can explain frameshifting by suppressor tRNAs, even those with expanded anticodon loops. The previous model that suppressor tRNAs induce quadruplet translocation now appears incorrect for most, and perhaps for all of them. We suggest that the 'spontaneous' tRNA-induced frameshifting and 'programmed' mRNA-induced frameshifting use the same mechanism, although the frequency of frameshifting is very different. This new model of frameshifting suggests that the tRNA is not acting as the yardstick to measure out the length of the translocation step. Rather, the translocation of 3 nucleotides may be an inherent feature of the ribosome.     

Ribosomal frameshifting, jumping and readthrough

New examples of high-level ribosomal frameshift and readthrough events have been described over the past year and a half. These include -1 frameshifting at tandem codons and +1 frameshifting at neighboring slow codons. Several bizarre examples of ribosome jumping and multiple stop-codon readthrough continue to perplex investigators in this field.     

Function of the ribosomal E-site: a mutagenesis study

Ribosomes synthesize proteins according to the information encoded in mRNA. During this process, both the incoming amino acid and the nascent peptide are bound to tRNA molecules. Three binding sites for tRNA in the ribosome are known: the A-site for aminoacyl-tRNA, the P-site for peptidyl-tRNA and the E-site for the deacylated tRNA leaving the ribosome. Here, we present a study of Escherichia coli ribosomes with the E-site binding destabilized by mutation C2394G of the 23S rRNA. Expression of the mutant 23S rRNA in vivo caused increased frameshifting and stop codon readthrough. The progression of these ribosomes through the ribosomal elongation cycle in vitro reveals ejection of deacylated tRNA during the translocation step or shortly after. E-site compromised ribosomes can undergo translocation, although in some cases it is less efficient and results in a frameshift. The mutation affects formation of the P/E hybrid site and leads to a loss of stimulation of the multiple turnover GTPase activity of EF-G by deacylated tRNA bound to the ribosome.     

An mRNA sequence derived from the yeast EST3 gene stimulates programmed +1 translational frameshifting

Programmed translational frameshift sites are sequences in mRNAs that promote frequent stochastic changes in translational reading frame allowing expression of alternative forms of protein products. The EST3 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encoding a subunit of telomerase, uses a programmed +1 frameshift site in its expression. We show that the site is complex, consisting of a heptameric sequence at which the frameshift occurs and a downstream 27-nucleotide stimulator sequence that increases frameshifting eightfold. The stimulator appears to be modular, composed of at least three separable domains. It increases frameshifting only when ribosomes pause at the frameshift site because of a limiting supply of a cognate aminoacyl-tRNA and not when pausing occurs at a nonsense codon. These data suggest that the EST3 stimulator may modulate access by aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosomal A site by interacting with several targets in a ribosome paused during elongation.     

Rates of aminoacyl-tRNA selection at 29 sense codons in vivo

We have placed aminoacyl-tRNA selection at individual codons in competition with a frameshift that is assumed to have a uniform rate. By assaying a reporter in the shifted frame, relative rates for association of the 29 YNN codons and their cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs were obtained during logarithmic growth in Escherichia coli. For five codons, three beginning with C and two with U, these relative rates agree with relative in vitro rates for elongation factor Tu-mediated aminoacyl-tRNA binding to ribosomes and subsequent GTP hydrolysis. Therefore, the frameshift assay probably measures this process in vivo. Observed rates for aminoacyl-tRNA selection span a 25-fold range. Therefore, the time required to transit different codons in vivo probably differs substantially. Codons very frequently used in highly expressed genes generally select aminoacyl-tRNAs more quickly than do rarely used codons. This suggests that speed of aminoacyl-tRNA selection is a significant factor determining biased use of synonymous codons. However, the preferential use of codons appears to be marked only for codons with the highest rates of aminoacyl-tRNA selection. Rapid selection in vivo is usually effected by elevation of the tRNA concentration for codons with moderate intrinsic speed (rate constant), not by choosing intrinsically fast codons. Despite a preference for high rate, there are quickly translated codons that are not commonly used, and common codons that are translated relatively slowly. Other factors are therefore more important than speed for some codons. Strong preference for rapid aminoacyl-tRNA selection is not observed in weakly expressed genes. Instead, there is a slight preference for slower aminoacyl-tRNA selection. The rate of aminoacyl-tRNA selection by a YNC codon is always greater than the rate of the corresponding YNU codon even though in many YNC/U pairs both codons react with the same elongation factor Tu/GTP/aminoacyl-tRNA complex. Thus, for these tRNAs, the differences between in vivo rate constants of tRNAs are dependent on the nature of anticodon base-pairing. However, no more general relationship is evident between codon/anticodon composition and rate of aminoacyl-tRNA selection. The frameshift method can be extended to all codons.     

Asc1, homolog of human RACK1, prevents frameshifting in yeast by ribosomes stalled at CGA codon repeats

Quality control systems monitor and stop translation at some ribosomal stalls, but it is unknown if halting translation at such stalls actually prevents synthesis of abnormal polypeptides. In yeast, ribosome stalling occurs at Arg CGA codon repeats, with even two consecutive CGA codons able to reduce translation by up to 50%. The conserved eukaryotic Asc1 protein limits translation through internal Arg CGA codon repeats. We show that, in the absence of Asc1 protein, ribosomes continue translating at CGA codons, but undergo substantial frameshifting with dramatically higher levels of frameshifting occurring with additional repeats of CGA codons. Frameshifting depends upon the slow or inefficient decoding of these codons, since frameshifting is suppressed by increased expression of the native tRNA^Arg(ICG) that decodes CGA codons by wobble decoding. Moreover, the extent of frameshifting is modulated by the position of the CGA codon repeat relative to the translation start site. Thus, translation fidelity depends upon Asc1-mediated quality control.     

Translational misreading: mutations in translation elongation factor 1alpha differentially affect programmed ribosomal frameshifting and drug sensitivity.

The translation elongation feactor 1alpha (EF-1alpha) catalyzes the critical step of delivering aminoacyl-tRNAs to the elongating ribosome. A series of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains containing mutant alleles of the TEF2 gene encoding EF-1alpha have phenotypes consistent with effects on cellular processes related to translation. These include (1) conditional growth defects, (2) antibiotic sensitivity or resistance, (3) altered +1 or -1 ribosomal frameshifting efficiencies, and (4) altered maintenance of the killer phenotype. Although all the mutant alleles were isolated as dominant +1 frameshift suppressors, the effects of these mutations on the cell are quite different when present as the only form of EF-1alpha. Allele-specific effects are observed with regard to their ability to alter the efficiency of programmed +1 frameshifting as opposed to programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting. The significantly altered efficiency of -1 frameshifting in strains containing the TEF2-4 and TEF2-9 mutant alleles further correlates with a reduced ability to maintain the killer phenotype and the M1 satellite virus of L-A, an in vivo assay of translational fidelity. In light of the proposed models regarding the different A- and P-site occupancy states required for +1 or -1 ribosomal frameshifting, these results aid analysis of interactions between EF-1alpha and the translational apparatus.     

Missense and nonsense suppressors can correct frameshift mutations

Missense and nonsense suppressor tRNAs, selected for their ability to read a new triplet codon, were observed to suppress one or more frameshift mutations in trpA of Escherichia coli. Two of the suppressible frameshift mutants, trpA8 and trpA46AspPR3, were cloned, sequenced, and found to be of the +1 type, resulting from the insertion of four nucleotides and one nucleotide, respectively. Twenty-two suppressor tRNAs were examined, 20 derived from one of the 3 glycine isoacceptor species, one from lysT, and one from trpT. The sequences of all but four of the mutant tRNAs are known, and two of those four were converted to suppressor tRNAs that were subsequently sequenced. Consideration of the coding specificities and anticodon sequences of the suppressor tRNAs does not suggest a unitary mechanism of frameshift suppression. Rather, the results indicate that different suppressors may shift frame according to different mechanisms. Examination of the suppression windows of the suppressible frameshift mutations indicates that some of the suppressors may work at cognate codons, either in the 0 frame or in the +1 frame, and others may act at noncognate codons (in either frame) by some as-yet-unspecified mechanism. Whatever the mechanisms, it is clear that some +1 frameshifting can occur at non-monotonous sequences. A striking example of a frameshifting missense suppressor is a mutant lysine tRNA that differs from wild-type lysine tRNA by only a single base in the amino acid acceptor stem, a C to U70 transition that results in a G.U base pair. It is suggested that when this mutant lysine tRNA reads its cognate codon, AAA, the presence of the G.U base pair sometimes leads either to a conformational change in the tRNA or to an altered interaction with some component of the translation machinery involved in translocation, resulting in a shift of reading frame. In general, the results indicate that translocation is not simply a function of anticodon loop size, that different frameshifting mechanisms may operate with different tRNAs, and that conformational features, some far removed from the anticodon region, are involved in maintaining fidelity in translocation.     

Genetic analysis of the E site during RF2 programmed frameshifting

The roles of the ribosomal E site are not fully understood. Prior evidence suggests that deacyl-tRNA in the E site can prevent frameshifting. We hypothesized that if the E-site codon must dissociate from its tRNA to allow for frameshifting, then weak codon:anticodon duplexes should allow for greater frameshifting than stronger duplexes. Using the well-characterized Escherichia coli RF2 (prfB) programmed frameshift to study frameshifting, we mutagenized the E-site triplet to all Unn and Cnn codons. Those variants should represent a very wide range of duplex stability. Duplex stability was estimated using two different methods. Frameshifting is inversely correlated with stability, as estimated by either method. These findings indicate that pairing between the deacyl-tRNA and the E-site codon opposes frameshifting. We discuss the implications of these findings on frame maintenance and on the RF2 programmed frameshift mechanism.     

An extended signal involved in eukaryotic -1 frameshifting operates through modification of the E site tRNA

By using a sensitive search program based on hidden Markov models (HMM), we identified 74 viruses carrying frameshift sites among 1500 fully sequenced virus genomes. These viruses are clustered in specific families or genera. Sequence analysis of the frameshift sites identified here, along with previously characterized sites, identified a strong bias toward the two nucleotides 5' of the shifty heptamer signal. Functional analysis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrated that high frameshifting efficiency is correlated with the presence of a Psi39 modification in the tRNA present in the E site of the ribosome at the time of frameshifting. These results demonstrate that an extended signal is involved in eukaryotic frameshifting and suggest additional interactions between tRNAs and the ribosome during decoding.     

Kinetics of ribosomal pausing during programmed -1 translational frameshifting

In the Saccharomyces cerevisiae double-stranded RNA virus, programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting is responsible for translation of the second open reading frame of the essential viral RNA. A typical slippery site and downstream pseudoknot are necessary for this frameshifting event, and previous work has demonstrated that ribosomes pause over the slippery site. The translational intermediate associated with a ribosome paused at this position is detected, and, using in vitro translation and quantitative heelprinting, the rates of synthesis, the ribosomal pause time, the proportion of ribosomes paused at the slippery site, and the fraction of paused ribosomes that frameshift are estimated. About 10% of ribosomes pause at the slippery site in vitro, and some 60% of these continue in the -1 frame. Ribosomes that continue in the -1 frame pause about 10 times longer than it takes to complete a peptide bond in vitro. Altering the rate of translational initiation alters the rate of frameshifting in vivo. Our in vitro and in vivo experiments can best be interpreted to mean that there are three methods by which ribosomes pass the frameshift site, only one of which results in frameshifting.     

Decreased peptidyltransferase activity correlates with increased programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting and viral maintenance defects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Increased efficiencies of programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting in yeast cells expressing mutant forms of ribosomal protein L3 are unable to maintain the dsRNA "Killer" virus. Here we demonstrate that changes in frameshifting and virus maintenance in these mutants correlates with decreased peptidyltransferase activities. The mutants did not affect Ty1-directed programmed +1 ribosomal frameshifting or nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Independent experiments demonstrate similar programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting specific defects in cells lacking ribosomal protein L41, which has previously been shown to result in peptidyltransferase defects in yeast. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that decreased peptidyltransferase activity should result in longer ribosome pause times after the accommodation step of the elongation cycle, allowing more time for ribosomal slippage at programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift signals.     

Recognition of translational termination signals

Ribosomes can specifically shift at certain codons so that the mRNA is read in two different reading frames. To determine if frameshifting occurs at the level of termination, polymers of defined sequence containing AUG, a coding sequence and an in- or out-of-phase nonsense codon were used to bind a termination substrate or to program synthesis and release of dipeptides in a highly purified in vitro translation system. fMet-tRNA bound to ribosomes with AUGUAA, AUGUAAn, AUGUUU, AUGUUA or AUGUAn was not a substrate for release factor RF-1. In contrast, AUGU1UAA, AUGU3UAAn, AUGU4UAAn, AUGU5UAAn effected RF-1-dependent release of fMet from ribosomes. This suggests that nonsense codons can stimulate release whether they occur in- or out-of-phase. Addition of exogenous UAA and RF-1 stimulated release with all oligonucleotides tested. Propagation restricted the RF-1-dependent recognition of out-of-phase nonsense codons but did not restrict recognition of in-phase UAA in AUGU3UAAn. Release of dipeptides from ribosomes programmed with AUGU4UAAn occurred without EF-G and with a mutant lacking EF-G activity, suggesting that out-of-phase termination can occur prior to translocation outside the ribosomal A-site. We propose that the ribosome X RF complex is required to complete proteins, but is also able to frameshift at a nonsense codon resulting in occasional out-of-phase termination of protein synthesis.     

Frameshift autoregulation in the gene for Escherichia coli release factor 2: partly functional mutants result in frameshift enhancement.

The regulation of release factor 2 (RF-2) synthesis in Escherichia coli occurs, at least in part, through autoregulatory feedback exerted at a unique frameshifting step required during RF-2 translation. We have constructed fusions between the genes for RF-2 and E. coli trpE which make direct measurement of frameshifting efficiency possible since both products of regulation, the termination product and the frameshift product, are stable. The addition of purified RF-2 to in vitro expressions of these fusion genes was found to result in decreased frameshifting and increased termination at the regulation site. The frame-shifted trpE-RF-2 products synthesized from these fusions are unique with respect to their functional release factor activities; when tested in assays of two intermediate steps of translational termination, they were found to be partially active for the function of ribosome binding, but inactive for peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis (release). These are the first examples of release factor mutants selectively active for only one of these function. In vivo these chimeric proteins promote large increases in frameshifting at the RF-2 frameshift region, thereby reversing normal negative autoregulatory feedback and instead supporting fully efficient frameshifting in their own synthesis. This activity provides new evidence for the importance of ribosomal pausing in directing efficient frameshifting at the RF-2 frameshift region.