c-Abl Kinase Is a Regulator of αvβ3 Integrin Mediated Melanoma A375 Cell Migration

Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors that physically link the extracellular matrix (ECM) to the intracellular actin cytoskeleton, and are also signaling molecules that transduce signals bi-directionally across the plasma membrane. Integrin regulation is essential for tumor cell migration in response to growth factors. c-Abl kinase is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase and is critical for signaling transduction from various receptors. Here we show that c-Abl kinase is involved in A375 cell migration mediated by α_vβ₃ integrin in response to PDGF stimulation. c-Abl kinase colocalizes with α_vβ₃ integrin dynamically and affects α_vβ₃ integrin affinity by regulating its cluster. The interaction between c-Abl kinase and α_vβ₃ integrin was dependent on the activity of c-Abl kinase induced by PDGF stimulation, but was not dependent on the binding of α_vβ₃ integrin with its ligands, suggesting that c-Abl kinase is not involved in the outside-in signaling of α_vβ₃ integrin. Talin head domain was required for the interaction between c-Abl kinase and α_vβ₃ integrin, and the SH3 domain of c-Abl kinase was involved in its interaction with talin and α_vβ₃ integrin. Taken together, we have uncovered a novel and critical role of c-Abl kinase in α_vβ₃ integrin mediated melanoma cell migration.     

Inhibition of integrins αv/α5-dependent functions in melanoma cells by an ECD-disintegrin acurhagin-C

Acurhagin-C, a Glu–Cys–Asp (ECD)-disintegrin from Agkistrodon acutus venom, has been reported as an endothelial apoptosis inducer, previously. Here we further evaluate its potential applications in cancer therapy. In vitro assays indicated that acurhagin-C not only may influence the cell viability at higher concentration, but also can potently and dose-dependently decrease cell proliferation in murine B16-F10 melanoma. Otherwise, it also had a dose-dependent inhibition on B16-F10 cell adhesion to extracellular matrices, collagen VI, gelatin B and fibronectin, as well as disturbed transendothelial migration of B16-F10 cell. Morphological study found that acurhagin-C dramatically affected B16-F10 cell adhesion to immobilized fibronectin, leading to the formation of multicellular aggregates with rounded shape. Detected by flow cytometry, acurhagin-C was able to induce B16-F10 cell apoptosis and alter cell cycle distribution through its interactions with integrins αv/α5, and thereafter initiation the apoptotic pathways of caspase-8/-9. Furthermore, acurhagin-C could synergistically enhance the anti-proliferative activity of methotrexate in B16-F10 cells and human melanoma SK-MEL-1 cells, without diminishing the growth of human epidermal melanocytes. Taken together, acurhagin-C proved to be a potent inhibitor of integrin-based functions in melanoma cells by activating the complex apoptotic pathways.     

Distinct Structural Requirements for Interaction of the Integrins α5β1, αvβ5, and αvβ6 with the Central Cell Binding Domain in Fibronectin

At least 10 different members of the integrin family have been reported to bind to fibronectin, and eight of these interact with the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) site in the tenth type III repeat. However, studies utilizing recombinant fibronectin fragments have shown that for three of these, α5β1, αIIbβ3, and αvβ3, the structural requirements for binding to fibronectin differ. In the present study. we report that two additional integrins, αvβ6. and αvβ5 also demonstrate unique requirements for interaction with recombinant fibronectin fragments. αvβ5, like αvβ3, can support cell adhesion to the RGD-containing tenth repeat alone, and does not require the presence of a synergy site in the adjacent ninth repeat. In the cells used in this study. αvβ5 only minimally supported adhesion to intact fibronectin. but did support adhesion to fragments composed of the eighth, ninth and tenth repeats or the tenth repeat. alone. Mutant fragments in which the eighth and tenth repeats were adjacent to one another enhanced adhesion mediated by αvβ5, as well as adhesion mediated by αvβ6. αvβ5 and αvβ6-mediated adhesion to all fibronectin fragments required interaction with the RGD site, as inferred by inhibition of adhesion with an RGD-containing peptide. These data suggest that each integrin that interacts with the RGD site in fibronectin has unique structural requirements for this interaction.     

Synthesis and initial evaluation of novel,non-peptidic antagonists of the αv-integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5

The discovery, synthesis and preliminary SAR of a novel class of non-peptidic antagonists of the α_v-integrins α_vβ₃ and α_vβ₅ is described. High-throughput screening of an extensive series of ECLiPS? compound libraries led to the identification of compound 1 as a dual inhibitor of the α_v-integrins α_vβ₃ and α_vβ₅. Optimization of compound 1 involving, in part, introduction of two novel constraints led to the discovery of compounds 15a and 15b with reduced PSA and much improved potency for both the α_vβ₃ and α_vβ₅ integrins. Compounds 15a and 15b were shown to have promising activity in functional cellular assays and compound 15a also exhibited a promising Caco-2 permeability profile.     

Distribution of αvβT3, αvβTB5 Integrins and the Integrin Associated Protein — IAP (CD47) in Human Glomerular Diseases

The av integrins present on the membrane of numerous cells, mediate attachment to matrix proteins, cell proliferation, migration and survival. We studied the expression of av integrins and CD47 (a 03 chain integrin associated protein) in various forms of glomerulonephritis (GN) characterized by mesangial proliferation and/or increased mesangial matrix. In normal glomeruli, epithelial cells expressed αvβT3, αvβT5 and CD47; endothelial cells expressed α5βT1 and CD47; mesangial cells expressed αvβT5, CD47, and to a less extent αvβT3. In acute post infectious GN (APIGN), membranoproliferative GN (MPGN) and diabetic nephropathy (DN), we observed that the βT3 chain, normally expressed by mesangial cells, was not detectable in the mesangium while its expression by epithelial cells was not modified. Parallel to the disappearance of αvβT3, the CD47 expression was decreased on the mesangial cells in MPGN, APIGN and DN. The expression of αvβT5 was clearly increased on podocytes and on proliferating mesangial cells in APIGN. By contrast, the mesangial expression of αvβT5 normal or decreased in DN. The α5 chain of integrin, absent on normal mesangial cell, was expressed on proliferating mesangial cells in MPGN and APIGN.

Thus, we observed modifications of avp3 and avp5 expression during human GN. The modulations of αvβT3 and αvβT5 expression differed according to the different glomerular cell types and were not parallel in glomerular cells: avp3 was decreased (and αvβT5 unchanged) on proliferating mesangial cells and αvβT5 was increased (and αvβT3 unchanged) in podocytes. This may reflect the existence of two distinct regulatory pathways.     

Structural Basis of the Differential Binding of Engineered Knottins to Integrins αVβ3 and α5β1

1. Download : Download high-res image (138KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

The Binding of Monomeric C-Reactive Protein (mCRP) to Integrins αvβ3 and α4β1 Is Related to Its Pro-Inflammatory Action

The prototypic acute phase reactant C-reactive protein (CRP) is not only a marker but also a potential contributor to inflammatory diseases. CRP exists as the circulating native, pentameric CRP (pCRP) and the monomeric isoform (mCRP), formed as a result of a dissociation process of pCRP. mCRP is highly pro-inflammatory, but pCRP is not. The mechanism of pro-inflammatory action of mCRP is unclear. We studied the role of integrins in pro-inflammatory action of mCRP. Docking simulation of interaction between mCRP and integrin αvβ3 predicted that mCRP binds to αvβ3 well. We found that mCRP actually bound to integrins αvβ3 and α4β1 well. Antagonists to αvβ3 or α4β1 effectively suppressed the interaction, suggesting that the interaction is specific. Using an integrin β1 mutant (β1-3-1) that has a small fragment from the ligand binding site of β3, we showed that mCRP bound to the classical RGD-binding site in αvβ3. We studied the role of integrins in CRP signaling in monocytic U937 cells. Integrins αvβ3 and α4β1 specifically mediated binding of mCRP to U937 cells. mCRP induced AKT phosphorylation, but not ERK1/2 phosphorylation, in U937 cells. Notably, mCRP induced robust chemotaxis in U937 cells, and antagonists to integrins αvβ3 and α4β1 and an inhibitor to phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase, but not an MEK inhibitor, effectively suppressed mCRP-induced chemotaxis in U937 cells. These results suggest that the integrin and AKT/phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase pathways play a role in pro-inflammatory action of mCRP in U937 cells. In contrast, pCRP is predicted to have a limited access to αvβ3 due to steric hindrance in the simulation. Consistent with the prediction, pCRP was much less effective in integrin binding, chemotaxis, or AKT phosphorylation. These findings suggest that the ability of CRP isoforms to bind to the integrins is related to their pro-inflammatory action.     

Interaction of αVβ3 and αVβ6 Integrins with Human Parechovirus 1

Human parechovirus (HPEV) infections are very common in early childhood and can be severe in neonates. It has been shown that integrins are important for cellular infectivity of HPEV1 through experiments using peptide blocking assays and function-blocking antibodies to α_V integrins. The interaction of HPEV1 with α_V integrins is presumably mediated by a C-terminal RGD motif in the capsid protein VP1. We characterized the binding of integrins α_Vβ₃ and α_Vβ₆ to HPEV1 by biochemical and structural studies. We showed that although HPEV1 bound efficiently to immobilized integrins, α_Vβ₆ bound more efficiently than α_Vβ₃ to immobilized HPEV1. Moreover, soluble α_Vβ₆, but not α_Vβ₃, blocked HPEV1 cellular infectivity, indicating that it is a high-affinity receptor for HPEV1. We also showed that HPEV1 binding to integrins in vitro could be partially blocked by RGD peptides. Using electron cryo-microscopy and image reconstruction, we showed that HPEV1 has the typical T=1 (pseudo T=3) organization of a picornavirus. Complexes of HPEV1 and integrins indicated that both integrin footprints reside between the 5-fold and 3-fold symmetry axes. This result does not match the RGD position predicted from the coxsackievirus A9 X-ray structure but is consistent with the predicted location of this motif in the shorter C terminus found in HPEV1. This first structural characterization of a parechovirus indicates that the differences in receptor binding are due to the amino acid differences in the integrins rather than to significantly different viral footprints.Picornaviruses consist of a positive-sense, single-stranded infectious RNA genome of approximately 7.3 kb enclosed in a capsid composed of 60 copies of each of the three or four capsid proteins (VP1 to VP4). Human parechovirus 1 (HPEV1) is a member of the Parechovirus genus of the Picornaviridae family (38, 70). There are currently eight completely sequenced human parechovirus types and 14 described types (4, 19, 24, 30, 38, 39, 51, 58, 78). In addition, the Parechovirus genus currently has four Ljungan virus members that infect rodents. HPEV1 exhibits several distinct molecular characteristics compared to other picornaviruses (38, 71). These include the lack of the maturation cleavage of the capsid proteins VP0 to VP4 (N-terminal) and VP2 (C-terminal), existence of an approximately 30-amino-acid-long extension to the N terminus of VP3, a unique nonstructural protein 2A, and a 5′ untranslated region that is more closely related to picornaviruses infecting animals than those infecting humans.HPEV infections are common during the first years of life and are often mild or asymptomatic (20, 28, 42, 73, 80). Recently, a number of new types have been identified, and their prevalence in stool samples, for example, highlights their clinical importance. Normally, they cause gastroenteritis and respiratory infections, but severe illnesses, such as infections of the central nervous system, generalized infections of neonates, and myocarditis, have also been associated with HPEV infections (1, 8, 10, 28, 80). Currently, the role of the unique molecular, structural, and antigenic characteristics of HPEVs in the pathogenesis of infection is unknown.HPEV types 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 are known to possess an RGD motif near the C terminus of VP1 that is known to facilitate binding of cellular ligands (e.g., fibronectin) to α_v integrins. The motif is in an analogous position to motifs in coxsackievirus A9 (CAV9) and echovirus 9 (EV9; Barty strain) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The role of the RGD sequence in cellular entry and subsequent replication of HPEV1 has been shown through blocking assays with RGD-containing peptides, mutation of the sequence, and function-blocking antibodies to α_v integrins (11, 43, 62, 71). These results strongly suggested that α_v integrins play a central role in the initiation of HPEV1 infection. Direct involvement of α_v integrins in the infectious entry of HPEV1 was further confirmed by overexpression of human α_vβ₁ and α_vβ₃ integrins in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, allowing successful virus infection (74). There are no reports yet on the identification of receptors for the HPEV types lacking the RGD motif (HPEV3, HPEV7, and HPEV8) (19, 39, 51).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Sequence alignments. Amino acid sequence alignment of the viral coat protein VP1 from different picornaviruses with the CAV9 secondary structure derived from the atomic model displayed above the alignment (34). The columns boxed in blue with red letters signify similarity, and the red column signifies identity. There is limited similarity between HPEV and other picornaviruses. C-terminal RGD motifs are boxed in red.Although the crystal structures of several picornaviruses have been determined (3, 26, 34, 35, 44, 57, 59, 65, 68, 72) and the receptor interactions have been studied in detail by X-ray crystallography, electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM), and three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction (6, 9, 23, 31, 32, 47, 83), there is no structural information available for the parechoviruses or parechovirus-receptor complexes. Here, we compare the binding of α_Vβ₃ and α_Vβ₆ to HPEV1 in vitro by biochemical assays and determine the structures of HPEV1 and the corresponding HPEV1-integrin complexes.     

Inhibition of α-Amylase Acting in Hexaploid Triticale Lines by Exogenous Abscisic Acid

Hexaploid triticale introgressive lines developed after recombination of A-genome with A^m-genome of diploid wheat (Triticum monococcum) were analysed in respect of grains responsiveness to exogenous ABA treatment. This was assessed by in vivo bioassay as grain germination indices, and by α-amylase assay as quantity of synthesised α-amylase measured with the technique of radial diffusion in agarose gel. The results showed an important diminishing of seedling length caused by ABA (variable in different lines) as well as genotype dependant variability of α-amylase synthesis inhibition. The differences of ABA responsiveness were seen both in whole grains and in embryoless half-grains as a direct reaction of the aleurone layer. Variation of grain sensitivity to ABA treatment compared with two sprouting resistance indices showed a significant correlation with Falling Number values in grains, but not with a dormant grains germination in spikes. This is an evidence that in triticale precocious starch decompose in unripened and ungerminated grains is dependent on genotype ABA-responsiveness of the aleurone layer. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Fusion of Epstein-Barr virus with epithelial cells can be triggered by αvβ5 in addition to αvβ6 and αvβ8, and integrin binding triggers a conformational change in glycoproteins gHgL

Fusion of herpesviruses with their target cells requires a minimum of three glycoproteins, namely, gB and a complex of gH and gL. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) fusion with an epithelial cell requires no additional virus glycoproteins, and we have shown previously that it can be initiated by an interaction between integrin αvβ6 or αvβ8 and gHgL. We now report that integrin αvβ5 can also bind to gHgL and trigger fusion. Binding of gHgL to integrins is a two-step reaction. The first step, analyzed by surface plasmon resonance, was fast, with high association and low dissociation rate constants. The second step, detected by fluorescence spectroscopy of gHgL labeled at cysteine 153 at the domain I-domain II interface with the environmentally sensitive probes acrylodan and IANBD, involved a slower conformational change. Interaction of gHgL with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies or Fab' fragments was also consistent with a two-step reaction involving fast high-affinity binding and a subsequent slower conformational change. None of the antibodies bound to the same epitope, and none completely inhibited integrin binding. However, binding of each decreased the rate of conformational change induced by integrin binding, suggesting that neutralization might involve a conformational change that precludes fusion. Overall, the data are consistent with the interaction of gHgL with an integrin inducing a functionally important rearrangement at the domain I-domain II interface.     

Direct Binding of the EGF-like Domain of Neuregulin-1 to Integrins (αvβ3 and α6β4) Is Involved in Neuregulin-1/ErbB Signaling

Integrin-growth factor receptor cross-talk plays a role in growth factor signaling, but the specifics are unclear. In a current model, integrins and growth factor receptors independently bind to their ligands (extracellular matrix and growth factors, respectively). We discovered that neuregulin-1 (NRG1), either as an isolated EGF-like domain or as a native multi-domain form, binds to integrins αvβ3 (with a K_D of 1.36 × 10⁻⁷ m) and α6β4. Docking simulation predicted that three Lys residues at positions 180, 184, and 186 of the EGF-like domain are involved in integrin binding. Mutating these residues to Glu individually or in combination markedly suppressed integrin binding and ErbB3 phosphorylation. Mutating all three Lys residues to Glu (the 3KE mutation) did not affect the ability of NRG1 to bind to ErbB3 but markedly reduced the ability of NRG1 to induce ErbB3 phosphorylation and AKT and Erk1/2 activation in MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells. This suggests that direct integrin binding to NRG1 is critical for NRG1/ErbB signaling. Notably, stimulation of cells with WT NRG1 induced co-precipitation of ErbB3 with α6β4 and with αvβ3 to a much lower extent. This suggests that WT NRG1 induces integrin-NRG1-ErbB3 ternary complex formation. In contrast, the 3KE mutant was much less effective in inducing ternary complex formation than WT NRG1, suggesting that this process depends on the ability of NRG1 to bind to integrins. These results suggest that direct NRG1-integrin interaction mediates integrin-ErbB cross-talk and that α6β4 plays a major role in NRG-ErbB signaling in these cancer cells.     

Integrin αvβ5 in endothelial cells of rat splenic sinus: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study

Localization of integrins β1-8, α1, α2, α3, α5, α6 and αv in sinus endothelial cells of the rat spleen was examined by immunofluorescence microscopy. Labeling for anti-integrin β5 and integrin αv was detected and colocalized in the entire circumference of endothelial cells. Labeling for integrin β5, vinculin and actin filaments demonstrated that they lay close to each other in the basal part of the endothelial cells. Although the other integrin βs, including integrin β1 and integrins α1, α2, α3, α5 and α6 in combination with integrin β1, were localized in leukocytes, slightly large cells, megakaryocytes and/or platelets in the sinus lumen and splenic cords, they were not detected in endothelial cells. Labeling for vitronectin, a component of the extracellular-matrix-binding integrin αvβ5, was strongly stained in the periphery of the wall of sinuses, as was collagen IV and, in addition, was localized in the cytoplasm of endothelial cells. Ultrastructural localization of integrin β5, vitronectin and clathrin was examined by immunogold electron microscopy to elucidate the involvement of integrin αvβ5 in the endocytosis of vitronectin in sinus endothelial cells. Electron microscopy with detergent extraction revealed abundant coated pits and coated vesicles in endothelial cells. Immunogold labeling for vitronectin was present in pits, vesicles and the stacked endoplasmic reticulum. Double-labeling for integrin β5 or integrin αv and clathrin revealed that they were colocalized in some vesicles in close proximity to the apical and lateral plasma membrane of the endothelial cells. The possible functional roles of integrin αvβ5 in endothelial cells of the splenic sinus are discussed.     

Atomic Basis for the Species-specific Inhibition of αV Integrins by Monoclonal Antibody 17E6 Is Revealed by the Crystal Structure of αVβ3 Ectodomain-17E6 Fab Complex

The function-blocking, non-RGD-containing, and primate-specific mouse monoclonal antibody 17E6 binds the αV subfamily of integrins. 17E6 is currently in phase II clinical trials for treating cancer. To elucidate the structural basis of recognition and the molecular mechanism of inhibition, we crystallized αVβ3 ectodomain in complex with the Fab fragment of 17E6. Protein crystals grew in presence of the activating cation Mn²⁺. The integrin in the complex and in solution assumed the genuflected conformation. 17E6 Fab bound exclusively to the Propeller domain of the αV subunit. At the core of αV-Fab interface were interactions involving Propeller residues Lys-203 and Gln-145, with the latter accounting for primate specificity. The Propeller residue Asp-150, which normally coordinates Arg of the ligand Arg-Gly-Asp motif, formed contacts with Arg-54 of the Fab that were expected to reduce soluble FN10 binding to cellular αVβ3 complexed with 17E6. This was confirmed in direct binding studies, suggesting that 17E6 is an allosteric inhibitor of αV integrins.     

Integrin α5β1 Expression Is Required for Inhibition of Keratinocyte Migration by Ganglioside GT1b

Polysialoganglioside GT1b, a keratinocyte membrane glycosphingolipid, inhibits normal keratinocyte adhesion and migration on a fibronectin matrix. The specificity of the inhibition for cells plated on a fibronectin matrix and competition of GT1b inhibition with peptide RGDS suggest that GT1b abrogates the α₅β₁/fibronectin interaction. We examined the effects of GT1b on the adhesion and migration of keratinocyte-derived cell lines and correlated GT1b responsiveness and α₅β₁integrin expression. GT1b (5 nM) significantly inhibited migration of normal human keratinocytes, immortalized keratinocytes, and squamous cell carcinoma SCC12F2 cells on fibronectin, but not on collagen I. Concentrations as high as 5 μM had no effect on SCC13 or HaCaT cells. Likewise, GT1b inhibited fibronectin-dependent cell adhesion of normal human keratinocytes, immortalized keratinocytes, and SCC12F2 cells, but had no effect on SCC13 or HaCaT cells. Flow cytometric and Western immunoblot analysis of integrin expression showed significantly decreased α₅and β₁integrin expression in SCC13 and HaCaT cells compared to normal keratinocytes, immortalized keratinocytes, and SCC12F2 cells. Incubation with TGF-β1 increased α₅β₁integrin expression and induced responsiveness to GT1b in HaCaT cells. These data imply that GT1b “response” requires sufficient expression of α₅β₁and further suggest that the mechanism of the inhibitory effect of GT1b involves GT1b/α₅β₁interaction.     

Activation of the integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) during arteriogenesis

Migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells (SMC) are important events during arteriogenesis, but the underlying mechanism is still only partially understood. The present study investigates the expression of integrins alpha 5 beta 1 and v beta 3 as well as focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and phosphorylated FAK (pY397), key mediators for cell migration and proliferation, in collateral vessels (CV) in rabbit hind limbs induced by femoral ligation or an arteriovenous (AV) shunt created between the distal femoral artery stump and the accompanying femoral vein by confocal immunofluorescence. In addition, the effect of the extracellular matrix components fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN), and Matrigel on expression of these focal adhesion molecules proliferation was studied in cultured SMCs. We found that: (1) in normal vessels (NV), both integrins alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha v beta 3 were mainly expressed in endothelial cells, very weak in smooth muscle cells (SMC); (2) in CVs, both alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha v beta 3 were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05); this was more evident in the shunt-side CVs, 1.5 and 1.3 times higher than that in the ligation side, respectively; (3) FAK and FAK(py397) were expressed in NVs and CVs in a similar profile as was alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha v beta 3; (4) in vitro SMCs cultured on fibronectin (overexpressed in collaterals) expressed higher levels of FAK, FAK (pY397), alpha 5 beta 1, and alpha v beta 3 than on laminin, whereas SMCs growing inside Matrigel expressed little of these proteins and showed no proliferation. In conclusion, our data demonstrate for the first time that the integrin-FAK signaling axis is activated in collateral vessels and that altered expression of FN and LN may play a crucial role in mediating the integrin-FAK signaling pathway activation. These findings explain a large part of the positive remodeling that collateral vessels undergo under the influence of high fluid shear stress.     

Role of α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins in relation to adhesion and spreading dynamics of prostate cancer cells interacting with fibronectin under in vitro conditions

Interaction of cell integrins with the ECM (extracellular matrix) proteins is commonly assumed to be associated with cell dissemination and tumour metastases. Since these processes depend on the mechanism of cell-protein interaction, we have attempted to show the contribution of α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins of the prostate cancer PC-3 cells in in vitro interaction with FN (fibronectin) adsorbed on defined polystyrene surfaces. Cell adhesion, spreading and cytoskeleton organization were studied using antibodies against integrins or a GRGDSP (Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro) peptide. The results show that blocking the α5β1 integrin causes: (i) a decrease in the number of the adherent cells in the early phase of adhesion and (ii) a decrease in the dynamics of cell spreading and cell shape changes, and weaker reorganization of cytoskeletal proteins than in the control cells. Conversely, the blocking of the αvβ3 integrin: (i) causes no observable effect on the number of the adhered cells; however, (ii) causes an increase in the dynamics of cell spreading and cell shape changes, and stronger reorganization of cytoskeletal proteins than in the control cells. Interestingly, the blocking of integrins with a GRGDSP peptide strongly decreases the number of the adhered cells, and a complete inhibition of cell spreading. Our results strongly suggest that the α5β1 integrin plays the main role in the adhesion and spreading of PC-3 cells interacting with FN, whereas the αvβ3 integrin seems to regulate other receptors in the spreading process. Moreover, integrin-FN interaction through the RGD sequence evidently curbed the cell adhesion and spreading.     

Redistribution of EGF Receptor and α5, β1 Integrins in Response to Infection of Epithelial Cells by Serratia proteamaculans

Cell and Tissue Biology - Eukaryotic cells use surface receptors to interact with the environment. Interacting with the cell receptors, pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria can invade cells that...