Functional interaction between dopamine receptor subtypes for the regulation of c-fos expression

Dopaminergic drugs increase the expression of the proto-oncogene, c-fos, in the brain, which is involved in the coordination of neurobiological changes caused by repeated cocaine or amphetamine use. This study examined the roles of five dopamine receptor subtypes on the c-fos promoter activity. D(1)R or D(5)R significantly increased the expression of c-fos promoter by activating protein kinase A. However, D(2)R, D(3)R, or D(4)R did not show any noticeable effects. The co-expression of D(1)R/D(3)R or D(1)R/D(2)R synergistically activated the basal and agonist-induced expression of the c-fos promoter, respectively. The Ral guanine-nucleotide-dissociation-stimulator-like, which was found to interact with the 3rd cytoplasmic loop of D(3)R, mediated the inhibitory activity of D(3)R in c-fos expression. In summary, the expression of the c-fos promoter was increased by the D1-like receptors and enhanced synergistically by the D2-like receptors via the modulation of cellular cAMP. D(3)R inhibited the expression of the c-fos promoter through an interaction with RGL.     

Different effects of five dopamine receptor subtypes on nuclear factor-kappaB activity in NG108-15 cells and mouse brain

We previously showed that dopamine receptors D1R and D2R expressed in NG108-15 cells activated protein kinase A and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) respectively, resulting in differential activation of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB activity. To investigate whether other dopamine receptor subtypes regulate NF-kappaB, we established NG108-15 cells stably expressing D3R, D4R and D5R (NGD3R, NGD4R and NGD5R). D5R stimulation with SKF 38393 decreased NF-kappaB luciferase reporter activity in NGD5R cells, similar to D1R stimulation in NGD1R cells. However, D3R or D4R stimulation with quinpirole showed no change in NF-kappaB-Luci activity, although forskolin-induced cyclic AMP responsive element-Luci activation was attenuated by quinpirole treatment in NGD2LR, NGD3R and NGD4R cells. As expected, activation of ERK or serum responsive element-luciferase reporter not observed following stimulation with quinpirole in D3R- or D4R-expressing cells. We further examined the effects of haloperidol and risperidone, which are typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs respectively, on NF-kappaB activity by gel shift assay in mouse frontal cortex. Haloperidol treatment slightly attenuated basal NF-kappaB activity. By contrast, risperidone treatment enhanced NF-kappaB activity. Taken together, D2R and D1R/D5R had opposite effects on NF-kappaB activity in NG108-15 cells. Risperidone up-regulated and haloperidol down-regulated NF-kappaB activity in mouse brain. This effect may be related to the atypical antipsychotic properties of risperidone.     

Structure-activity determinants in paneth cell alpha-defensins: loss-of-function in mouse cryptdin-4 by charge-reversal at arginine residue positions

Paneth cells secrete microbicidal enteric alpha-defensins into the small intestinal lumen, and cryptdin-4 (Crp4) is the most bactericidal of the mouse alpha-defensin peptides in vitro. Here, site-directed Arg to Asp mutations in Crp4 have been shown to attenuate or eliminate microbicidal activity against all of the bacterial species tested regardless of the Arg residue position. R31D/R32D charge-reversal mutagenesis at the C terminus and mutations at R16D/R18D, R16D/R24D, and R18D/R24D in the Crp4 polypeptide chain eliminated in vitro bactericidal activity, blocked peptide-membrane interactions, as well as Crp4-mediated membrane vesicle disruption. Lys for Arg charge-neutral substitutions in (R16K/R18K)-Crp4 did not alter the bactericidal activity relative to Crp4, showing that bactericidal activity appears not to require the guanidinium side chain of Arg at those two positions. Partial restoration of (R31D/R32D)-Crp4 bactericidal activity occurred when an electropositive Arg for Gly substitution was introduced at the peptide N terminus and the (G1R/R31D/R32D)-Crp4 peptide exhibited intermediate membrane binding capability. Also, the loss of peptide bactericidal activity in (G1D/R31D/R32D)-Crp4 and (R16D/R24D)-Crp4 mutants corresponded with diminished phospholipid vesicle disruptive activity. Fluorophore leakage from anionic phospholipid vesicles induced by the charge-reversal variants was negligible relative to Crp4 and lower than that induced by pro-Crp4, the inactive Crp4 precursor. Thus, Arg residues function as determinants of Crp4 bactericidal activity by facilitating or enabling target cell membrane disruption. The role of the Arg residues, however, was surprisingly independent of their position in the polypeptide chain.     

Regulation of Activation and Processing of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) by a Complex Electrostatic Interaction between the Regulatory Domain and Cytoplasmic Loop 3

NEG2, a short C-terminal segment (817–838) of the unique regulatory (R) domain of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channel, has been reported to regulate CFTR gating in response to cAMP-dependent R domain phosphorylation. The underlying mechanism, however, is unclear. Here, Lys-946 of cytoplasmic loop 3 (CL3) is proposed as counter-ion of Asp-835, Asp-836, or Glu-838 of NEG2 to prevent the channel activation by PKA. Arg-764 or Arg-766 of the Ser-768 phosphorylation site of the R domain is proposed to promote the channel activation possibly by weakening the putative CL3-NEG2 electrostatic attraction. First, not only D835A, D836A, and E838A but also K946A reduced the PKA-dependent CFTR activation. Second, both K946D and D835R/D836R/E838R mutants were activated by ATP and curcumin to a different extent. Third, R764A and R766A mutants enhanced the PKA-dependent activation. However, it is very exciting that D835R/D836R/E838R and K946D/H950D and H950R exhibited normal channel processing and activity whereas D835R/D836R/E838R/K946D/H950D was fractionally misprocessed and silent in response to forskolin. Further, D836R and E838R played a critical role in the asymmetric electrostatic regulation of CFTR processing, and Ser-768 phosphorylation may not be involved. Thus, a complex interfacial interaction among CL3, NEG2, and the Ser-768 phosphorylation site may be responsible for the asymmetric electrostatic regulation of CFTR activation and processing.     

Strain‐specific proportion of the two isoforms of the dopamine D2 receptor in the mouse striatum: associated neural and behavioral phenotypes

Genetic variability in the proportion of the two alternative dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) mRNA splice variants, D2R‐long (D2L) and D2R‐short (D2S), influence corticostriatal functioning and could be implicated in liability to psychopathology. This study compared mesostriatal D2L/D2S ratios and associated neural and behavioral phenotypes in mice of the DBA/2J and C57BL/6J‐inbred strains, which differ for schizophrenia‐ and addiction‐like phenotypes. Results showed that DBA/2J mice lack the striatal predominance of D2L that has been reported in the rat and in C57BL/6J mice and confirmed in the latter strain by this study. Only C57BL/6J mice showed enhanced striatal c‐Fos expression under D1R and D2/3R co‐stimulation, indicating synergistic interaction between the subtypes of DA receptors. Instead, DBA/2J mice were characterized by opposing effects of D2/3R and D1R stimulation on striatal c‐Fos expression, in line with a more pronounced influence of D2S isoform, and did not express stereotyped climbing under D1R and D2/3R co‐stimulation, as reported for D2L?/? mice. Finally, strain‐specific modulation of c‐Fos expression by D1R and D2/3R co‐stimulation was selectively observed in striatal compartments receiving inputs from the prefrontal cortex and involved in the control of motivated behaviors. These results show differences in tissue‐specific D2R splicing in mice with intact genotypes and support a role for this phenotype in individual variability of corticostriatal functioning and in liability to psychopathology.     

Molecular cytogenetic analyses of hexaploid lines spontaneously appearing in octoploid Triticale

Genome characterization of 14 hexaploid lines that spontaneously appeared in octoploid Triticales was carried out by sequential genomic in situ hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization, high molecular weight glutenin subunits and SSR marker analyses. All of the lines showed a chromosome constitution of complete A and B genomes, and a composite genome consisting of the chromosomes of D and R genomes. The composite genome of the 11 lines consisted of chromosomes 1R, 2D, 3R, 4R, 5R, 6R and 7R, that of the two lines were 1D, 2D, 3R, 4R, 5R, 6R and 7R, and that of one line was 1R, 2D, 3R, 4R, 5R, 6D and 7R. The incompatibility of the D and R genomes in common wheat genetic background, preferential retention of chromosome 2D and importance of these lines for the development of hexaploid Triticale are discussed in this report.     

Comparative studies of molecular mechanisms of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors for the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase

Dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors (D(2)R/D(3)R), which have similar structural architecture as well as functional similarities, are expressed in the same brain dopaminergic neurons. It is intriguing that two receptor proteins with virtually the same functional roles are expressed in the same neuron. Recently we have shown that D(2)R and D(3)R possess different regulatory processes including intracellular trafficking properties, which implies that they might employ different signaling mechanisms for regulation of the same cellular processes. Here we studied the signaling pathways of ERK activation mediated by D(2)R and D(3)R in HEK-293 cells and corroborated them with concomitant studies in COS-7 cells and C6 cells. Our results show that Src, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and atypical protein kinase C were commonly involved in D(2)R-/D(3)R-mediated ERK activation. However, beta-arrestin and sequestration of D(2)R/D(3)R were found not to be involved. ERK activations mediated by D(3)R, but not D(2)R, were blocked by betaARK-CT, AG1478 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, and by dominant negative mutants of Ras and Raf, suggesting the involvement of the Gbetagamma(i) pathway. The alpha-subunit of G(o) (Galpha(o)) was able to couple with D(3)R to mediate ERK activation. We conclude that D(3)R mainly utilizes the betagamma pathway of G(i) protein, which involves the transactivation of EGFR in HEK-293 cells. In contrast, the alpha-subunit of the G(i) protein plays a main role in D(2)R-mediated ERK activation. Our study suggests one example of intricate cellular regulations in the brain, that is, dopaminergic neurons could regulate ERK activity more flexibly through alternative usage of either the D(2)R or D(3)R pathway depending on the cellular situation.     

Wnt5a-dopamine D2 receptor interactions regulate dopamine neuron development via extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation

The dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) plays an important role in mesencephalic dopaminergic neuronal development, particularly coupled with extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation. Wnt5a protein is known to regulate the development of dopaminergic neurons. We analyzed the effect of Wnt5a on dopaminergic neuron development in mesencephalic primary cultures from wild-type (WT) and D2R knock-out (D2R(-/-)) mice. Treatment with Wnt5a increased the number and neuritic length of dopamine neurons in primary mesencephalic neuronal cultures from WT mice, but not from D2R(-/-) mice. The effect of Wnt5a was completely blocked by treatment with D2R antagonist or inhibitors of MAPK or EGFR. Wnt5a-mediated ERK activation in mesencephalic neuronal cultures was inhibited by treatment of D2R antagonist and EGFR inhibitors in WT mice. However, these regulations were not observed for D2R(-/-) mice. Co-immunoprecipitation and displacement of [(3)H]spiperone from D2R by Wnt5a demonstrated that Wnt5a could bind with D2R. This interaction was confirmed by GST pulldown assays demonstrating that the domain including transmembrane domain 4, second extracellular loop, and transmembrane domain 5 of D2R binds to Wnt5a. These results suggest that the interaction between D2R and Wnt5a has an important role in dopamine neuron development in association with EGFR and the ERK pathway.     

G protein-coupled receptor kinase regulates dopamine D3 receptor signaling by modulating the stability of a receptor-filamin-beta-arrestin complex. A case of autoreceptor regulation

In addition to its postsynaptic role, the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) serves as a presynaptic autoreceptor, where it provides continuous feedback regulation of dopamine release at nerve terminals for processes as diverse as emotional tone and locomotion. D3R signaling ability is supported by an association with filamin (actin-binding protein 280), which localizes the receptor with G proteins in plasma membrane lipid rafts but is not appreciably antagonized in a classical sense by the ligand-mediated activation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and beta-arrestins. In this study, we investigate GRK-mediated regulation of D3R.filamin complex stability and its effect on D3R.G protein signaling potential. Studies in HEK-293 cells show that in the absence of agonist the D3R immunoprecipitates in a complex containing both filamin A and beta-arrestin2. Moreover, the filamin directly interacts with beta-arrestin2 as assessed by immunoprecipitation and yeast two-hybrid studies. With reductions in basal GRK2/3 activity, an increase in the basal association of filamin A and beta-arrestin2 with D3R is observed. Conversely, increases in the basal GRK2/3 activity result in a reduction in the interaction between the D3R and filamin but a relative increase in the agonist-mediated interaction between beta-arrestin2 and the D3R. Our data suggest that the D3R, filamin A, and beta-arrestin form a signaling complex that is destabilized by agonist- or expression-mediated increases in GRK2/3 activity. These findings provide a novel GRK-based mechanism for regulating D3R signaling potential and provide insight for interpreting D3R autoreceptor behavior.     

Roles of protein kinase C and actin-binding protein 280 in the regulation of intracellular trafficking of dopamine D3 receptor

D(3) dopamine receptor (D(3)R) is expressed mainly in parts of the brain that control the emotional behaviors. It is believed that the improper regulation of D(3)R is involved in the etiology of schizophrenia. Desensitization of D(3)R is weakly associated with G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)/beta-arrestin-directed internalization. This suggests that there might be an alternative pathway that regulates D(3)R signaling. This report shows that D(3)R undergoes robust protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent sequestration that is accompanied by receptor phosphorylation and the desensitization of signaling. PKC-dependent D(3)R sequestration, which was enhanced by PKC-beta or -delta, was dynamin dependent but independent of GRK, beta-arrestin, or caveolin 1. Site-directed mutagenesis of all possible phosphorylation sites within the intracellular loops of D(3)R identified serine residues at positions 229 and 257 as the critical amino acids responsible for phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA)-induced D(3)R phosphorylation, sequestration, and desensitization. In addition, the LxxY endocytosis motif, which is located between residues 252 and 255, was found to play accommodating roles for PMA-induced D(3)R sequestration. A continuous interaction with the actin-binding protein 280 (filamin A), which was previously known to interact with D(3)R, is required for PMA-induced D(3)R sequestration. In conclusion, the PKC-dependent but GRK-/beta-arrestin-independent phosphorylation of D(3)R is the main pathway responsible for the sequestration and desensitization of D(3)R. Filamin A is essential for both the efficient signaling and sequestration of D(3)R.     

Distinctive and synergistic signaling of human adenosine A2a and dopamine D2L receptors in CHO cells

Adenosine A(2a) receptor (A(2a)R) colocalizes with dopamine D(2) receptor (D(2)R) in the basal ganglia and modulates D(2)R-mediated dopaminergic activities. A(2a)R and D(2)R couple to stimulatory and inhibitory G proteins, respectively. Their opposing roles in regulating neuronal activities, such as locomotion and alcohol consumption, are mediated by their opposite actions on adenylate cyclase, which often serves as "co-incidence detector" of various activators. On the other hand, the neural actions of A(2a)R and D(2)R are also, at least partially, independent of each other, as indicated by studies using D(2)R and A(2a)R knock-out mice. Here we co-expressed human A(2a)R and human D(2L)R in CHO cells and examined their signaling characteristics. Human A(2a)R desensitized rapidly upon agonist stimulation. A(2a)R activity (80%) was diminished after 2 hr of pretreatment with its agonist CGS21680. In contrast, human D(2L)R activity was sustained even after 2 hr and 18 hr pretreatment with its agonist quinpirole. Long-term (18 hr) stimulation of human D(2L)R also increased basal cAMP levels in CHO cells, whereas long-term (18 hr) activation of human A(2a)R did not affect basal cAMP levels. Furthermore, long-term (18 hr) activation of D(2L)R dramatically sensitized A(2a)R-induced stimulation of adenylate cyclase in a pertussis toxin-sensitive way. Forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was significantly increased after short-term (2 hr) human D(2L)R stimulation and further elevated after long-term (18 hr) D(2L)R activation. However, neither short-term (2 hr) nor long-term (18 hr) stimulation of A(2a)R affected the inhibitory effects of D(2L)R on adenylate cyclase. Co-stimulation of A(2a)R and D(2L)R could not induce desensitization or sensitization of D(2L)R either. In summary, signaling through A(2a)R and D(2L)R is distinctive and synergistic, supporting their unique and yet integrative roles in regulating neuronal functions when both receptors are present.     

Transient and rapid activation of Akt/GSK‐3β and mTORC1 signaling by D3 dopamine receptor stimulation in dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens

D2/D3 dopamine receptors (D2R/D3R) agonists regulate Akt, but their effects display a complex time‐course. In addition, the respective roles of D2R and D3R are not defined and downstream targets remain poorly characterized, especially in vivo. These issues were addressed here for D3R. Systemic administration of quinelorane, a D2R/D3R agonist, transiently increased phosphorylation of Akt and GSK‐3β in rat nucleus accumbens and dorsal striatum with maximal effects 10 min after injection. Akt activation was associated with phosphorylation of several effectors of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1): p70S6 kinase, ribosomal protein‐S6 (Ser240/244), and eukaryotic initiation factor‐4E binding protein‐1. The action of quinelorane was antagonized by a D2/D3R antagonist, raclopride, and the selective D3R antagonist S33084, inactive by themselves. Furthermore, no effect of quinerolane was seen in knock‐out mice lacking D3R. In drd1a‐EGFP transgenic mice, quinelorane activated Akt/GSK‐3β in both neurons expressing and lacking D1 receptor. Thus, the stimulation of D3R transiently activates the Akt/GSK‐3β pathway in the two populations of medium‐size spiny neurons of the nucleus accumbens and dorsal striatum. This effect may contribute to the influence of D3R ligands on reward, cognition, and processes disrupted in schizophrenia, drug abuse, and Parkinson's disease.     

Cytoplasmic tail of D1 dopaminergic receptor differentially regulates desensitization and phosphorylation by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and 3

Herein, we investigate the differential D1 dopaminergic receptor (D1R) regulation by G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 2 and 3 using two truncated receptors lacking the distal (Δ425) and distal-central (Δ379) cytoplasmic tail (CT) regions. We first show the association between D1R and GRKs in co-transfected cells and rat striatum. Our studies further indicate that deletion of distal CT region of D1R does not alter the association between receptor and GRK2. Meanwhile, removal of both distal and central CT regions culminates in a drastic increase in the basal association between Δ379 and GRK2 relative to D1R and Δ425. Interestingly, CT truncations have no effect on the basal and DA-induced association of receptors with GRK3. Furthermore, we demonstrate that desensitization of D1R is considerably more robust in cells expressing GRK3. Notably, the robust GRK3-induced D1R desensitization is not attenuated by CT deletions. However, GRK2-induced Δ425 desensitization is not detectable whereas we unexpectedly find that Δ379 desensitization is similar to GRK2-induced D1R desensitization. GRK2 and GRK3-dependent desensitization of wild type D1R is not linked to differences in the extent of DA-induced receptor phosphorylation. Moreover, our studies show that GRK2-induced D1R phosphorylation is only modulated by deletion of distal CT region while distal and central CT regions control GRK3-induced D1R phosphorylation. Intriguingly, dopamine-induced Δ379 phosphorylation by GRK3 was significantly lower than receptor phosphorylation in cells harboring Δ379 alone or Δ379 and GRK2. Overall, our study suggests an intricate interplay between CT regions of D1R in differentially regulating receptor responsiveness by GRK2 and GRK3.     

Diuraphis noxia and Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) interactions and their injury on resistant and susceptible cereal seedlings

Interspecific interactions between the symptomatic (chlorosis-eliciting) Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko), and the asymptomatic (nonchlorosis-eliciting) bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), on four cereal genotypes were examined by simultaneous infestations. Four cereals (i.e., Diuraphis noxia-susceptible 'Arapahoe' wheat and 'Morex' barley, and D. noxia-resistant 'Halt' wheat and 'Border' oat) and four infestations (i.e., control, D. noxia, R. padi, and D. noxia/R. padi) were used in the research. Whereas D. noxia biomass confirmed D. noxia resistance among the cereals, R. padi biomass indicated that the D. noxia-resistant cereals did not confer R. padi resistance. D. noxia biomass was significantly lower in D. noxia/R. padi infestation than that in D. noxia infestation on all cereals, except Border oat, which indicated an antagonistic effect of R. padi on D. noxia. All aphid infestations caused a significant plant biomass reduction in comparison with the control. In comparison with D. noxia infestation, D. noxia/R. padi caused a significant plant biomass reduction on all cereals, except Morex barley. Although D. noxia biomass in D. noxia/R. padi infestation was significantly less than that in D. noxia infestation, leaf chlorophyll reduction was the same between D. noxia/R. padi and D. noxia infestations, which suggested that the asymptomatic R. padi enhanced the D. noxia-elicited leaf chlorophyll loss. The regression between chlorophyll content and aphid biomass indicated that the asymptomatic R. padi in the D. noxia/R. padi infestation enhanced chlorophyll loss, but interspecific aphid interaction on plant biomass varied among the cereals.     

Functional expression of single-chain heterodimeric G-protein-coupled receptors for adenosine and dopamine

The direct homo- and heteromeric association between G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), adenosine A2A receptor (A(2A)R) and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R), occurs although little is known about the selectivity of their formation (A(2A)R/A(2A)R vs. A(2A)R/D2R). In order to stimulate the heteromerization of A(2A)R and D2R, we have designed a single-polypeptide-chain heterodimeric A(2A)R/D2R complex by fusing the C-terminus of the A(2A)R via transmembrane (TM) of a type II TM protein with the N-terminus of D2R in tandem. This was successfully expressed on the cell surface as a full-length protein with specific binding to the respective ligands and functional coupling to G-proteins comparable to wild-type receptors, suggesting the possible creation of physiologically relevant heteromeric A(2A)R/D2R. This expression system would be useful to exclusively clarify the properties of heteromeric GPCRs irrespective of homomeric receptors.     

Differential regulation of the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors by G protein-coupled receptor kinases and beta-arrestins

The D(2) and D(3) receptors (D(2)R and D(3)R), which are potential targets for antipsychotic drugs, have a similar structural architecture and signaling pathway. Furthermore, in some brain regions they are expressed in the same cells, suggesting that differences between the two receptors might lie in other properties such as their regulation. In this study we investigated, using COS-7 and HEK-293 cells, the mechanism underlying the intracellular trafficking of the D(2)R and D(3)R. Activation of D(2)R caused G protein-coupled receptor kinase-dependent receptor phosphorylation, a robust translocation of beta-arrestin to the cell membrane, and profound receptor internalization. The internalization of the D(2)R was dynamin-dependent, suggesting that a clathrin-coated endocytic pathway is involved. In addition, the D(2)R, upon agonist-mediated internalization, localized to intracellular compartments distinct from those utilized by the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. However, in the case of the D(3)R, only subtle agonist-mediated receptor phosphorylation, beta-arrestin translocation to the plasma membrane, and receptor internalization were observed. Interchange of the second and third intracellular loops of the D(2)R and D(3)R reversed their phenotypes, implicating these regions in the regulatory properties of the two receptors. Our studies thus indicate that functional distinctions between the D(2)R and D(3)R may be found in their desensitization and cellular trafficking properties. The differences in their regulatory properties suggest that they have distinct physiological roles in the brain.     

On the existence of a possible A2A-D2-β-Arrestin2 complex: A2A agonist modulation of D2 agonist-induced β-arrestin2 recruitment

Given that coactivation of adenosine A(2A) (A(2A)R) and dopamine D(2) (D(2)R) receptors results in the coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization of the A(2A)R and D(2)R and the role of scaffolding protein β-arrestin2 in the desensitization, internalization, and signaling of G-protein-coupled receptors, in this study we explored the ability of the A(2A)R agonist CGS21680 in A(2A)R-D(2)R-coexpressing cells to modulate the D(2)R agonist-induced recruitment of β-arrestin2 to the D(2)R by means of proximity-based bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET(2)) and co-trafficking analysis. We found evidence that CGS21680 can increase the maximal BRET(2) signal between β-arrestin2(RLuc) and D(2L)R(GFP2) upon D(2)R activation, by increasing the potency of the D(2)R agonist to exert this action. In addition, this change was associated with an increased formation of cytoplasmic clusters containing β-arrestin2(GFP2) and D(2L)R(YFP) as seen from the co-trafficking analysis. Furthermore, the A(2A)R agonist advanced the time for the increase in Akt phosphorylation obtained with the D(2)R agonist. Finally, using a novel bioinformatics approach to predict the protein-protein interface, we have also found that amino acid pro-triplets TNY, LLS, RAF, and VSR may be crucial for the -induced β-arrestin2 recruitment by A(2A)R-D(2)R heteromers. Taken together, the results indicate that the antagonistic A(2A)R-D(2)R allosteric receptor-receptor interaction in A(2A)R-D(2)R heteromers favors β-arrestin2 recruitment to the D(2L)R protomer with subsequent cointernalization associated with a reduced time onset of Akt phosphorylation followed by a rapid dephosphorylation. Thus, β-arrestin2 action becomes more rapid and short-lasting and, in this way, mimics G-protein-mediated signaling.     

Role of Dopamine D2/D3 Receptors in Development,Plasticity, and Neuroprotection in Human iPSC-Derived Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons

The role of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors (D2R/D3R), located on midbrain dopaminergic (DA) neurons, in the regulation of DA synthesis and release and in DA neuron homeostasis has been extensively investigated in rodent animal models. By contrast, the properties of D2R/D3R in human DA neurons have not been elucidated yet. On this line, the use of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) for producing any types of cells has offered the innovative opportunity for investigating the human neuronal phenotypes at the molecular levels. In the present study, hiPSCs generated from human dermal fibroblasts were used to produce midbrain DA (mDA) neurons, expressing the proper set of genes and proteins typical of authentic, terminally differentiated DA neurons. In this model, the expression and the functional properties of the human D2R/D3R were investigated with a combination of biochemical and functional techniques. We observed that in hiPSC-derived mDA neurons, the activation of D2R/D3R promotes the proliferation of neuronal progenitor cells. In addition, we found that D2R/D3R activation inhibits nicotine-stimulated DA release and exerts neurotrophic effects on mDA neurons that likely occur via the activation of PI3K-dependent mechanisms. Furthermore, D2R/D3R stimulation counteracts both the aggregation of alpha-synuclein induced by glucose deprivation and the associated neuronal damage affecting both the soma and the dendrites of mDA neurons. Taken together, these data point to the D2R/D3R-related signaling events as a biochemical pathway crucial for supporting both neuronal development and survival and protection of human DA neurons.