Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees I: Light intensities and flight activity

Bees are mostly active during the daytime, but nocturnality has been reported in some bee families. We studied temporal flight activity in three species of carpenter bees (genus Xylocopa) in relation to light intensities. X. leucothorax is diurnal, X. tenuiscapa is largely diurnal being only occasionally crepuscular, while X. tranquebarica is truly nocturnal. Occasional forays into dim light by X. tenuiscapa are likely to be due to the availability of richly rewarding Heterophragma quadriloculare (Bignoniaceae) flowers, which open at night. X. tranquebarica can fly even during the moonless parts of nights when light intensities were lower than 10⁻⁵ cd m⁻², which makes this species the only truly nocturnal bee known so far. Other known dim-light species fly during crepuscular or moonlit periods. We compare eye and body sizes with other known diurnal and dim-light bees. We conclude that while extremely large ocellar diameters, large eye size:body size ratio, large number of ommatidia and large ommatidial diameters are all adaptations to dim-light foraging, these alone do not sufficiently explain the flights of X. tranquebarica in extremely dim light. We hypothesise that additional adaptations must confer extreme nocturnality in X. tranquebarica.     

Hornets Can Fly at Night without Obvious Adaptations of Eyes and Ocelli

Hornets, the largest social wasps, have a reputation of being facultatively nocturnal. Here we confirm flight activity of hornet workers in dim twilight. We studied the eyes and ocelli of European hornets (Vespa crabro) and common wasps (Vespula vulgaris) with the goal to find the optical and anatomical adaptations that enable them to fly in dim light. Adaptations described for obligately nocturnal hymenoptera such as the bees Xylocopa tranquebarica and Megalopta genalis and the wasp Apoica pallens include large ocelli and compound eyes with wide rhabdoms and large facet lenses. Interestingly, we did not find any such adaptations in hornet eyes or ocelli. On the contrary, their eyes are even less sensitive than those of the obligately diurnal common wasps. Therefore we conclude that hornets, like several facultatively nocturnal bee species such as Apis mellifera adansonii, A. dorsata and X. tenuiscapa are capable of seeing in dim light simply due to the large body and thus eye size. We propose that neural pooling strategies and behavioural adaptations precede anatomical adaptations in the eyes and ocelli when insects with apposition compound eyes turn to dim light activity.     

Retinal and optical adaptations for nocturnal vision in the halictid bee<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Megalopta genalis</Emphasis>

The apposition compound eye of a nocturnal bee, the halictid Megalopta genalis, is described for the first time. Compared to the compound eye of the worker honeybee Apis mellifera and the diurnal halictid bee Lasioglossum leucozonium, the eye of M. genalis shows specific retinal and optical adaptations for vision in dim light. The major anatomical adaptations within the eye of the nocturnal bee are (1) nearly twofold larger ommatidial facets and (2) a 4–5 times wider rhabdom diameter than found in the diurnal bees studied. Optically, the apposition eye of M. genalis is 27 times more sensitive to light than the eyes of the diurnal bees. This increased optical sensitivity represents a clear optical adaptation to low light intensities. Although this unique nocturnal apposition eye has a greatly improved ability to catch light, a 27-fold increase in sensitivity alone cannot account for nocturnal vision at light intensities that are 8 log units dimmer than during daytime. New evidence suggests that additional neuronal spatial summation within the first optic ganglion, the lamina, is involved.B.G. is thankful for travel awards from the Royal Physiographic Society, the Per Westlings Fond, the Foundation of Dagny and Eilert Ekvall and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. E.J.W. is grateful for the support of a Smithsonian Short-Term Research Fellowship, the Swedish Research Council, the Crafoord Foundation, the Wenner-Gren Foundation and the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund for their ongoing support     

Ocellar optics in nocturnal and diurnal bees and wasps

Nocturnal bees, wasps and ants have considerably larger ocelli than their diurnal relatives, suggesting an active role in vision at night. In a first step to understanding what this role might be, the morphology and physiological optics of ocelli were investigated in three tropical rainforest species – the nocturnal sweat bee Megalopta genalis, the nocturnal paper wasp Apoica pallens and the diurnal paper wasp Polistes occidentalis – using hanging-drop techniques and standard histological methods. Ocellar image quality, in addition to lens focal length and back focal distance, was determined in all three species. During flight, the ocellar receptive fields of both nocturnal species are centred very dorsally, possibly in order to maximise sensitivity to the narrow dorsal field of light that enters through gaps in the rainforest canopy. Since all ocelli investigated had a slightly oval shape, images were found to be astigmatic: images formed by the major axis of the ocellus were located further from the proximal surface of the lens than images formed by the minor axis. Despite being astigmatic, images formed at either focal plane were reasonably sharp in all ocelli investigated. When compared to the position of the retina below the lens, measurements of back focal distance reveal that the ocelli of Megalopta are highly underfocused and unable to resolve spatial detail. This together with their very large and tightly packed rhabdoms suggests a role in making sensitive measurements of ambient light intensity. In contrast, the ocelli of the two wasps form images near the proximal boundary of the retina, suggesting the potential for modest resolving power. In light of these results, possible roles for ocelli in nocturnal bees and wasps are discussed, including the hypothesis that they might be involved in nocturnal homing and navigation, using two main cues: the spatial pattern of bright patches of daylight visible through the rainforest canopy, and compass information obtained from polarised skylight (from the setting sun or the moon) that penetrates these patches.     

Neural organisation in the first optic ganglion of the nocturnal bee <Emphasis Type="Italic">Megalopta genalis</Emphasis>

Each neural unit (cartridge) in the first optic ganglion (lamina) of the nocturnal bee Megalopta genalis contains nine receptor cell axons (6 short and 3 long visual fibres), and four different types of first-order interneurons, also known as L-fibres (L1 to L4) or lamina monopolar cells. The short visual fibres terminate within the lamina as three different types (svf 1, 2, 3). The three long visual fibres pass through the lamina without forming characteristic branching patterns and terminate in the second optic ganglion, the medulla. The lateral branching pattern of svf 2 into adjacent cartridges is unique for hymenopterans. In addition, all four types of L-fibres show dorso-ventrally arranged, wide, lateral branching in this nocturnal bee. This is in contrast to the diurnal bees Apis mellifera and Lasioglossum leucozonium, where only two out of four L-fibre types (L2 and L4) reach neighbouring cartridges. In M. genalis, L1 forms two sub-types, viz. L1-a and L1-b; L1-b in particular has the potential to contact several neighbouring cartridges. L2 and L4 in the nocturnal bee are similar to L2 and L4 in the diurnal bees but have dorso-ventral arborisations that are twice as wide. A new type of laterally spreading L3 has been discovered in the nocturnal bee. The extensive neural branching pattern of L-fibres in M. genalis indicates a potential role for these neurons in the spatial summation of photons from large groups of ommatidia. This specific adaptation in the nocturnal bee could significantly improve reliability of vision in dim light. B.G. is grateful for travel awards from the Royal Physiographic Society, the Per Westlings Fond, the Foundation of Dagny and Eilert Ekvall and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. E.J.W. acknowledges the receipt of a Smithsonian Short-Term Research Fellowship and thanks the Swedish Research Council, the Crafoord Foundation, the Wenner–Gren Foundation and the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund for their ongoing support. W.T.W. was supported by general research funds from the Smithonian Tropical Research Institute     

Luminance-dependence of spatial vision in budgerigars (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Melopsittacus undulatus</Emphasis>) and Bourke’s parrots (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Neopsephotus bourkii</Emphasis>)

Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and Bourke’s parrots (Neopsephotus bourkii) are closely related birds with different activity patterns. Budgerigars are strictly diurnal while Bourke’s parrots are active in dim twilight. Earlier studies show that the intensity threshold of colour vision is similar in both species while Bourke’s parrots have larger eyes with a higher density of rods than budgerigars. In this study, we investigate whether this could be an adaptation for better spatial vision in dim light. We used two alternative forced-choice experiments to determine the spatial acuity of both species at light intensities ranging from 0.08 to 73 cd/m². We also determined the spatial contrast sensitivity function (CSF) for bright light in Bourke’s parrots and compare it to existing data for budgerigars. The spatial acuity of Bourke’s parrots was found to be similar to that of budgerigars at all light levels. Also the CSF of Bourke’s parrots is similar to that of budgerigars with a sensitivity peak located between 2.1 and 2.6 cycles/degree. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that Bourke’s parrots have superior spatial acuity in dim light compared to budgerigars and the adaptive value of the relatively rod-rich and large eyes of Bourke’s parrots remains unclear.     

Visual reliability and information rate in the retina of a nocturnal bee

Nocturnal animals relying on vision typically have eyes that are optically and morphologically adapted for both increased sensitivity and greater information capacity in dim light. Here, we investigate whether adaptations for increased sensitivity also are found in their photoreceptors by using closely related and fast-flying nocturnal and diurnal bees as model animals. The nocturnal bee Megalopta genalis is capable of foraging and homing by using visually discriminated landmarks at starlight intensities. Megalopta's near relative, Lasioglossum leucozonium, performs these tasks only in bright sunshine. By recording intracellular responses to Gaussian white-noise stimuli, we show that photoreceptors in Megalopta actually code less information at most light levels than those in Lasioglossum. However, as in several other nocturnal arthropods, Megalopta's photoreceptors possess a much greater gain of transduction, indicating that nocturnal photoreceptors trade information capacity for sensitivity. By sacrificing photoreceptor signal-to-noise ratio and information capacity in dim light for an increased gain and, thus, an increased sensitivity, this strategy can benefit nocturnal insects that use neural summation to improve visual reliability at night.     

Adaptations for vision in dim light: impulse responses and bumps in nocturnal spider photoreceptor cells (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Cupiennius</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">salei</Emphasis> Keys)

The photoreceptor cells of the nocturnal spider Cupiennius salei were investigated by intracellular electrophysiology. (1) The responses of photoreceptor cells of posterior median (PM) and anterior median (AM) eyes to short (2 ms) light pulses showed long integration times in the dark-adapted and shorter integration times in the light-adapted state. (2) At very low light intensities, the photoreceptors responded to single photons with discrete potentials, called bumps, of high amplitude (2–20 mV). When measured in profoundly dark-adapted photoreceptor cells of the PM eyes these bumps showed an integration time of 128 ± 35 ms (n = 7) whereas in dark-adapted photoreceptor cells of AM eyes the integration time was 84 ± 13 ms (n = 8), indicating that the AM eyes are intrinsically faster than the PM eyes. (3) Long integration times, which improve visual reliability in dim light, and large responses to single photons in the dark-adapted state, contribute to a high visual sensitivity in Cupiennius at night. This conclusion is underlined by a calculation of sensitivity that accounts for both anatomical and physiological characteristics of the eye.     

Light intensity limits foraging activity in nocturnal and crepuscular bees

A crepuscular or nocturnal lifestyle has evolved in bees severaltimes independently, probably to explore rewarding pollen sourceswithout competition and to minimize predation and nest parasites.Despite these obvious advantages, only few bee species are nocturnal.Here we show that the sensitivity of the bee apposition eyeis a major factor limiting the ability to forage in dim light.We present data on eye size, foraging times, and light levelsfor Megalopta genalis (Augochlorini, Halictidae) in Panama,and Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) sp. (Halictini, Halictidae)in Utah, USA. M. genalis females forage exclusively during twilight,but as a result of dim light levels in the rain forest, theyare adapted to extremely low intensities. The likely factorlimiting their foraging activity is finding their nest entranceon return from a foraging trip. The lowest light intensity atwhich they can do this, both in the morning and the evening,is 0.0001 cd m^–2. Therefore, they leave the nest at dimmerlight levels in the morning than in the evening. Lasioglossum(Sphecodogastra) foraging is limited by light intensity in theevening, but probably by temperature in the morning in the temperateclimate of Utah. We propose that the evolution of nocturnalityin bees was favored by the large variance in the size of females.     

Nocturnal vision and landmark orientation in a tropical halictid bee

BACKGROUND: Some bees and wasps have evolved nocturnal behavior, presumably to exploit night-flowering plants or avoid predators. Like their day-active relatives, they have apposition compound eyes, a design usually found in diurnal insects. The insensitive optics of apposition eyes are not well suited for nocturnal vision. How well then do nocturnal bees and wasps see? What optical and neural adaptations have they evolved for nocturnal vision? RESULTS: We studied female tropical nocturnal sweat bees (Megalopta genalis) and discovered that they are able to learn landmarks around their nest entrance prior to nocturnal foraging trips and to use them to locate the nest upon return. The morphology and optics of the eye, and the physiological properties of the photoreceptors, have evolved to give Megalopta's eyes almost 30 times greater sensitivity to light than the eyes of diurnal worker honeybees, but this alone does not explain their nocturnal visual behavior. This implies that sensitivity is improved by a strategy of photon summation in time and in space, the latter of which requires the presence of specialized cells that laterally connect ommatidia into groups. First-order interneurons, with significantly wider lateral branching than those found in diurnal bees, have been identified in the first optic ganglion (the lamina ganglionaris) of Megalopta's optic lobe. We believe that these cells have the potential to mediate spatial summation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarcity of photons, Megalopta is able to visually orient to landmarks at night in a dark forest understory, an ability permitted by unusually sensitive apposition eyes and neural photon summation.     

Caste-specific visual adaptations to distinct daily activity schedules in Australian Myrmecia ants

Animals are active at different times of the day and their activity schedules are shaped by competition, time-limited food resources and predators. Different temporal niches provide different light conditions, which affect the quality of visual information available to animals, in particular for navigation. We analysed caste-specific differences in compound eyes and ocelli in four congeneric sympatric species of Myrmecia ants, with emphasis on within-species adaptive flexibility and daily activity rhythms. Each caste has its own lifestyle: workers are exclusively pedestrian; alate females lead a brief life on the wing before becoming pedestrian; alate males lead a life exclusively on the wing. While workers of the four species range from diurnal, diurnal-crepuscular, crepuscular-nocturnal to nocturnal, the activity times of conspecific alates do not match in all cases. Even within a single species, we found eye area, facet numbers, facet sizes, rhabdom diameters and ocelli size to be tuned to the distinct temporal niche each caste occupies. We discuss these visual adaptations in relation to ambient light levels, visual tasks and mode of locomotion.     

Comparison of stimulus-response (V-log I) functions in five types of lepidopteran compound eyes (46 species)

Summary Stimulus intensity-response relations (V-log I curves) were electrophysiologically (ERG) determined for the compound eyes of 46 lepidopteran species belonging to five different groups: butterflies (22 species), hesperids (3 species), diurnal sphingids (2 species), diurnal moths (3 species) and nocturnal moths (16 species). The V-log I curves were fitted to the Naka and Rushton equation, in whichn represents the slope of the linear part of each curve. The slopes so determined range fromn=0.35 (the shallowest slope) in nocturnal moths with the greatest dynamic range ton=0.54 (the steepest slope) in diurnal moths andn=0.53 in butterflies both of which have narrow dynamic range. Hesperids (n=0.41) and diurnal sphingids (n=0.38) have intermediate values between butterflies and nocturnal moths.The ratio of rhabdom to retinula volume is significantly higher in nocturnal moths (70–75%), however, those of butterflies and of diurnal moths are very small (2–5%), and hesperids and diurnal sphingids show intermediate ratio (ca. 25%).The slopes of V-log I curves are inversely proportional to the ratio of rhabdom to retinula volume in the various eye types. In all groups except diurnal moths, the light intensities which produce maximal and saturated responses are nearly the same, therefore the nocturnal moths which have the lowest threshold to light increase their sensitivity to dim light mainly by decreasing the slopes of V-log I curves.     

Vision in the dimmest habitats on Earth

A very large proportion of the world's animal species are active in dim light, either under the cover of night or in the depths of the sea. The worlds they see can be dim and extended, with light reaching the eyes from all directions at once, or they can be composed of bright point sources, like the multitudes of stars seen in a clear night sky or the rare sparks of bioluminescence that are visible in the deep sea. The eye designs of nocturnal and deep-sea animals have evolved in response to these two very different types of habitats, being optimised for maximum sensitivity to extended scenes, or to point sources, or to both. After describing the many visual adaptations that have evolved across the animal kingdom for maximising sensitivity to extended and point-source scenes, I then use case studies from the recent literature to show how these adaptations have endowed nocturnal animals with excellent vision. Nocturnal animals can see colour and negotiate dimly illuminated obstacles during flight. They can also navigate using learned terrestrial landmarks, the constellations of stars or the dim pattern of polarised light formed around the moon. The conclusion from these studies is clear: nocturnal habitats are just as rich in visual details as diurnal habitats are, and nocturnal animals have evolved visual systems capable of exploiting them. The same is certainly true of deep-sea animals, as future research will no doubt reveal.     

Seasonal changes in canopy photosynthesis and foliage respiration in a Rhizophora stylosa stand at the northern limit of its natural distribution

Gross photosynthesis and respiration rates of leaves at different canopy heights in a Rhizophora stylosa Griff. stand were measured monthly over 1 year at Manko Wetland, Okinawa Island, Japan, which is the northern limit of its distribution. The light-saturated net photosynthesis rate for the leaves at the top of the canopy showed a maximum value of 17 μmol CO₂ m⁻² s⁻¹ in warm season and a minimum value of 6 μmol CO₂ m⁻² s⁻¹ in cold season. The light-saturated gross photosynthesis and dark respiration rates of the leaves existing at the top of the canopy were 2−7 times and 3–16 times, respectively, those of leaves at the bottom of the canopy throughout the year. The light compensation point of leaves showed maximum and minimum peaks in warm season and cold season, respectively. The annual canopy gross photosynthesis, foliage respiration, and surplus production were estimated as 117, 49, and 68 t CO₂ ha⁻¹ year⁻¹, respectively. The energy efficiency of the annual canopy gross photosynthesis was 2.5%. The gross primary production GPP fell near the regression curve of GPP on the product of leaf area index and warmth index, the regression curve which was established for forests in the Western Pacific with humid climates.     

Effects of temperature and light on the growth and geosmin production of Lyngbya kuetzingii (Cyanophyta)

The effects of temperature and light on the growth and geosmin production of Lyngbya kuetzingii were determined. Of the three temperatures tested, 10, 25 and 35°C, the maximal geosmin concentration and geosmin productivity were yielded at 10°C, while the highest chl a production was observed at 25°C. In the studies on light intensity, the maximal geosmin concentration and geosmin productivity were observed at 10 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹, while the highest chl a production was at 20 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹. It was suggested that more geosmin was synthesized with lower chl a demand. Meanwhile, the relative amounts of extra- and intracellular geosmin were investigated. Under optimum growth conditions (20 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹, 25°C; BG-11 medium), the amounts of extracellular geosmin increased as the growth progressed and reached the maximum in the stationary phase, while the intracellular geosmin reached its maximum value in the late exponential phase, and then began to decline. However, under the low temperature (10°C) or light (10 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) conditions, more intracellular geosmin was synthesized and mainly accumulated in the cells. The proportions of extracellular geosmin were high, to 33.33 and 32.27%, respectively, during the stationary phase at 35°C and 20 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹. It was indicated that low temperature or light could stimulate geosmin production and favor the accumulation of geosmin in cells, while more intracellular geosmin may be released into the medium at higher temperatures or optimum light intensity.     

The roles ofDrosophila ocelli and compound eyes in phototaxis

Summary Drosophila have three types of photoreceptors in their compound eyes: R1–6, R7, and R8. In addition they have simple eyes, ocelli, with another type of photoreceptor. The role of each type of receptor and the possible interaction of their inputs were examined in an innate visual preference task, fast walking phototaxis. Flies were found to be attracted to light, i.e., positively phototactic. We compared the strength of the photopositive response and the spectral preference of normal fly strains and mutant fly strains lacking functional ocelli, R1–6, or R7, singly or in combination. Electroretinographic measures were used to confirm the specificity of deficits in visual mutant strains and the normal functioning of intact receptors.The strength of the photopositive response was strong, as indicated by the high correlation between increases in the intensity of the variable stimulus and increasing numbers of flies attracted toward it. Nearly all strains with or without intact receptor types showed high correlations whether the constant intensity stimulus offered as the alternative choice was bright 467 nm light (Figs. 1 and 2) or dim 572 nm light (Figs. 3 and 4). These constant stimuli were selected so that data in relevant intensity ranges of receptor function would be obtained. An important exception to the high correlations in the intensityresponse functions occurred with flies lacking function in all receptor types except R8; their positive phototaxis was extremely weak in dim light (Fig. 3).Analyses of the phototactic spectral sensitivities (Figs. 5 and 6), as well as comparisons with known electrophysiological spectral sensitivities, were used to determine the inputs from compound eye receptors and to demonstrate central interaction of these inputs with ocellar input. Several experiments with converging evidence suggest that R7 (when present) and R8 dominate fast phototaxis in the conditions of our experiment. R1–6 is the predominant compound eye receptor type in ERG measures; however, its behavioral input is clearly demonstrated only as enhancing R8 dominance of phototaxis in experiments using a dim constant stimulus and as enhancing R7 dominance of phototaxis in experiments using a bright constant stimulus. Similarly, the presence of ocellar receptors also facilitates R8 input in dim light and R7 input in bright light. The data substantiating these respective conclusions are: (1) a lack of dim light phototaxis in a mutant strain with only R8 functional (Fig. 3); and (2) a lack of an ultraviolet (UV) maximum from R7 in bright light phototaxis in a mutant strain with only R7 and R8 functional (Fig. 5c).Generally, absence of the ocelli and R1–6 had remarkably little effect on fast phototactic behavior except for the interaction with R7 and R8 inputs. This interaction is consistent with a theory that ocelli serve to modulate compound eye sensitivity.Abbreviations ERG electroretinogram - PDA prolonged depolarizing afterpotential - R (1–6, 7, 8) retinular cell(s) - UV ultraviolet We thank K. Frayer, F. Garfinkel, K. Hansen, M. Johnson, R. Srygley, and G. Sullivan for technical assistance; K. Hansen was instrumental in running the experiments at extremely dim conditions. Supported by grants NSF-BNS-76-11921 and NIH-1-RO1-EY-02487-01A1 (to W.S.S.). Experiments reported in this paper were included in a dissertation (Karin G. Hu) submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Ph.D. degree to the Department of Psychology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218. We thank members of the Graduate Board Dissertation Examining Committee for their comments: Drs. E. Blass, R. DeVoe, K. Muller and W. Sofer.     

Combined effect of temperature and light intensity on growth and extracellular polymeric substance production by the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis

The effects of light intensity and temperature on Arthrospira platensis growth and production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in batch culture were evaluated using a three-level, full-factorial design and response surface methodology. Three levels were tested for each parameter (temperature: 30, 35, 40°C; light intensity: 50, 115, 180 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹). Both growth and EPS production are influenced mainly by the temperature factor but the interaction term temperature*light intensity also had a significant effect. In addition, conditions optimising EPS production are different from those optimising growth. The highest growth rate (0.414 ± 0.003 day⁻¹) was found at the lowest temperature (30°C) and highest light intensity (180 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) tested, no optima were detectable within the given test range. Obviously, optima for growth must be at a temperature lower than 30°C and a light intensity higher than 180 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹. For EPS production, light intensity had a positive linear effect (optimum obviously higher than 180 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹), but for the temperature parameter a maximum effect was detectable at 35°C.     

Growth, uptake, and assimilation of ammonium, nitrate, and urea, by three strains of Karenia brevis grown under low light

Observations of near-bottom populations of Karenia brevis suggest that these cells may derive nutrients from the sediment–water interface. Cells undergoing a metabolic-mediated migration may be in close proximity to enhanced concentrations of nutrients associated with the sediment during at least a fraction of their diel cycle. In this study, the growth, uptake and assimilation rates of ammonium, nitrate, and urea by K. brevis were examined on a diel basis to better understand the potential role of these nutrients in the near-bottom ecology of this species. Three strains of K. brevis, C6, C3, and CCMP 2229, were grown under 12:12 light dark cycle under 30 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ delivered to the surface plain of batch cultures. Nitrogen uptake was evaluated using ¹⁵N tracer techniques and trichloroacetic acid extraction was used to evaluate the quantity of nitrogen (N) assimilated into cell protein. Growth rates ranged from a low of 0.12 divisions day⁻¹ for C6 and C3 grown on nitrate to a high of 0.18 divisions day⁻¹ for C3 grown on urea. Diurnal maximum uptake rates, ρ_max, varied from 0.41 pmol-N cell⁻¹ h⁻¹ for CCMP 2229 grown on nitrate, to 1.29 pmol-N cell⁻¹ h⁻¹ for CCMP 2229 grown on urea. Average nocturnal uptake rates were 29% of diurnal rates for nitrate, 103% of diurnal uptake rates for ammonium and 56% of diurnal uptake rates for urea. Uptake kinetic parameters varied between substrates, between strains and between day and night measurements. Highest maximum uptake rates were found for urea for strains CCMP2229 and C3 and for ammonium for strain C6. Rates of asmilation into protein also varied day and night, but overall were highest for urea. The comparison of maximal uptake rates as well as assimilation efficiencies indicate that ammonium and urea are utilized (taken up and assimilated) more than twice was fast as nitrate on a diel basis.     

Differential control of light-dark adaptation in the ocelli and compound eyes of Triatoma infestans

The adaptation to light of compound eyes in insects has been extensively documented and their adaptive role is well understood. Much less attention has been paid, however, to the control of ocelli sensitivity, a study which could help us to understand the functional role of these simple eyes. We analyzed the dynamic changes in the distribution of screening pigments which occur in the ocelli of the haematophagous bug, Triatoma infestans, when the insects are subjected either to light/dark cycles (LD), to constant darkness (DD) or constant light (LL). We then compared these changes with those occurring in the compound eyes of the same individuals and found that, while compound eyes are subject to the control of an endogenous circadian clock, the adaptation of the ocelli is entirely dependent on environmental illumination. In addition, we have observed that environmental temperature is not involved in the control of screening pigments in either ocelli or compound eyes as a direct stimulus, nor as a Zeitgeber. The existence of a differential control in the components of the dual visual system represents an adaptive advantage in the adjustment of visual sensitivity in insects exposed to quick changes in lighting conditions in their natural habitat. We discuss the implications of our findings with regards to the biology of triatomines and with respect to the general understanding the functional role of insect ocelli.