Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology

Conventional cytospin smears prepared from urinary tract specimens were compared with two new thin layer techniques, i.e. ThinPrep and AutoCyte PREP. Cellularity, cell preservation, background features, detection rate, screening time and ease of preparation were evaluated. Thin-layer techniques when applied to urine cytology were found to improve cell yield and cell preservation, and reduce background artefact. The reporting rate for abnormal urothelial cells was comparable to conventional cytospin smears, as was screening time. Laboratory staff found the methodologies to be practicable and easily incorporated into a large routine diagnostic service. We conclude that a one-slide thin-layer urine preparation is comparable to four cytospin slides in the detection of urothelial abnormalities, and that both ThinPrep and AutoCyte PREP have comparable features.     

Use of automated primary screening on liquid-based, thin-layer preparations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the AutoPap System (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) (TriPath) in screening AutoCyte PREP liquid-based, thin-layer preparations by comparing the final cytologic diagnoses with instrument slide classification results. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 9,665 AutoCyte PREP thin-layer slides were first independently screened to establish a final cytologic diagnosis (reference diagnosis). The slides were then processed on the AutoPap System. Each slide successfully processed was reported into result categories. The generated report gave a ranking score for each slide designated for "review." Slides designated "no further review" (NFR) were also listed in the report. The reported results were then compared to the reference cytologic diagnoses. RESULTS: Of 9,665 slides initially submitted to the AutoPap, 8,688 (90.8%) were qualified for scanning, and 884 (9.2%) were definitely classified as process review or rerun and excluded from the study. Of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and greater (HSIL+), 85.2% were ranked in the first rank, 12.7% in the second, one (2.1%) in the third, none in the fourth and fifth and none in the NFR category. Of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 47.4% were ranked in the first rank, 20.8% in the second, 10.6% in the third, 10.1% in the fourth, 5.3% in the fifth and 5.8% in NFR. Of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, 53.6% were ranked in the first rank, 22.5% in the second, 12.4% in the third, 5.4% in the fourth, 3.8% in the fifth and 2.3% in NFR. Considering a cutoff value at < or = 3rd rank, 84% of cervical abnormalities (RR 6.52, 95% CI 4.96-8.66) and 100% of HSIL+ were identified. CONCLUSION: The AutoPap demonstrates a high capability for detecting cervical abnormalities on AutoCyte PREP thin-layer slides. HSIL+ was associated with the highest instrument scores.     

Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphologic characteristics of gynecologic samples prepared by 3 different methods of liquid-based cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic samples from representative cases of each diagnostic category of squamous epithelial lesion, prepared by automated and manual liquid-based systems, were analyzed by 3 laboratories in the United States, Portugal and Brazil. The systems included: ThinPrep (automated, U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved; Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), Autocyte PREP (South American system, manual; TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) and DNACITOLIQ (manual; Digene Brazil, S?o Paulo, Brazil). A panel of 16 morphologic parameters was evaluated: cellularity, clean background, uniform distribution, artifacts, cellular overlapping, architectural and cytoplasmic distortion, cytoplasmic vacuolization, cellular elongation, imprecise cytoplasmic borders, folded cytoplasmic borders, nuclear hyperchromasia, coarse chromatin, prominent nucleolus, irregular nuclear borders, atypical mitosis and inflammatory infiltrate. Negative, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases were included. Cases without biopsies were confirmed by consensus. RESULTS: Cellularity was adequate in all samples. Clean background was observed in the vast majority of samples with all liquid-based systems. Uniform distribution was frequently found in ThinPrep and Autocyte PREP samples but not in DNACITOLIQ. Artifacts were not present in DNACITOLIQ samples, rare in ThinPrep and observed in 8 (34.7%) Autocyte PREP. Cellular overlapping was observed in all 3 system samples: 11 (31.42%) cases in ThinPrep, 16 (69.56%) in Autocyte PREP and 17 (68%) in DNACITOLIQ System. Architectural and cytoplasmic distortion were present in 3 cases of HSIL (13%) and cytoplasmic vacuolization in 2 cases of LSIL and 1 HSIL of Autocyte PREP. Cellular elongation was found in 13 (56.5%) Autocyte PREP and in 5 (20%) DNACITOLIQ samples. Inflammatory infiltrate was found in all 3 system samples but with more frequency in the Autocyte PREP (69.56%) and DNACITOLIQ System (72%). CONCLUSION: This study clearly indicated that in spite of the different methodologies, the 3 methods adequately preserved cellular structure for morphologic evaluation. The choice of method will depend on price, availability and procedures involved.     

Evaluation of a centrifuge method and thin-layer preparation in urine cytology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the quality and cost of urine cytology using the Cytospin method (Shandon, ThermoElectron Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) and the AutoCyte PREP (TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in a general laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: A study of differences between the Cytospin method and AutoCyte PREP in the areas of specimen preparation, staining, number and quality of diagnostic cells, background, screener preference, and cost was undertaken over a 3-month period in 2000. Sixty fresh voided urine samples from 25 patients with known transitional cell carcinoma were prepared by the Cytospin method and the AutoCyte PREP according to the manufacturers' instructions. RESULTS: The Cytospin method had longer preparation time but shorter screening time than the AutoCyte PREP. The number of diagnostic cells was higher in the Cytospin method. Fixation quality and staining clarity were better in the Cytospin method. Qualitative assessment of cell arrangements, cell and nuclear size and shape, nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear membrane irregularity showed no significant differences between the 2 methods. Cellular details and nuclear chromatin patterns were clearer and better preserved in the Cytospin method, but the AutoCyte PREP showed less blood and inflammatory cells and debris. CONCLUSION: In the majority of cases the screeners preferred the Cytospin method due to its better overall cytologic quality. However, the amount of blood, inflammation and debris was much lower in the AutoCyte PREP. This reduced the need to make a second, diluted specimen and made turnaround time faster. The AutoCyte PREP was 7 times more expensive than the Cytospin method.     

Evaluation of the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical cytopathology laboratory

OBJECTIVE: To compare the AutoCyte SCREEN (AutoCyte, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) system with manual screening by experienced cytotechnologists using thin-layer preparations that had been previously extensively studied and their cytologic abnormalities well defined. STUDY DESIGN: AutoCyte PREP (AutoCyte) samples prepared for a previous split-sample study comparing thin-layer preparations to conventional smears were used. These 1,992 AutoCyte PREP samples were in a cohort the abnormal findings of which had been confirmed via independent review by two sets of pathologists. For the current study, these samples were remasked and evaluated by the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical laboratory. The instrument scanned each slide and selected six overview fields and 120 single objects for storage and display. The computer classified each slide in one of the following categories: abnormal, uncertain, normal or unsatisfactory. Independently for each case, a cytotechnologist evaluated the six fields and 120 objects selected by the instrument as abnormal, normal or unsatisfactory. For those cases classified as uncertain by AutoCyte, the technologist then reexamined the cellular displays and entered a consensus classification. These results were then compared to those of an independent review by cytotechnologists of the identical set of slides using routine manual screening. RESULTS: The AutoCyte SCREEN selected 35% of slides for manual review. Technologist and computer rendered equivalent classifications in 79%. Of the total slides screened by the AutoCyte SCREEN, 57% were classified as "uncertain," and 88% of these were subsequently classified as normal by consensus. Using the well-defined abnormal values of the cellular sample as a basis for calculation, the AutoCyte SCREEN-assisted practice had a diagnostic sensitivity of 85% and diagnostic specificity of 97.6%. Comparable values for manual screening of the identical cellular sample were a diagnostic sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 97.4%. CONCLUSION: The AutoCyte SCREEN achieves comparable or greater sensitivity in detecting cervical abnormalities in comparison with manual screening. When combined with the substantial advantage of thin-layer preparations over conventional smears, the AutoCyte SCREEN provides a screening system of superior sensitivity over conventionally prepared and examined cervical smears.     

Comparison of TriPath thin-layer technology with conventional methods on nongynecologic specimens

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the TriPath PREP (previously called AutoCyte) TriPath Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in nongynecologic cytologic material by performing side-by-side comparison of conventional preparations with TriPath-prepared slides. STUDY DESIGN: An initial study of 613 cases (set A) was conducted to compare the TriPath PREP system with conventional methods for the evaluation of nongynecologic specimens, including urine, body cavity effusions, cerebrospinal fluid, pulmonary and gastrointestinal specimens. Paired cases were evaluated for cellularity, staining quality, preservation and representation of diagnostic material. Subsequent changes in the automated technique warranted reevaluation of the TriPath method. The follow-up study of 259 cases (set B) was conducted with the same design as set A. Results of evaluated parameters were analyzed using the chi 2 test. RESULTS: Results of the two sets were strikingly different. Prior to technical changes made by the laboratory, the TriPath method was significantly inferior. In the second set, the preferred material was most commonly the TriPath-prepared material. In particular, the majority of urine samples were prepared better by the automated, thin-layer system. CONCLUSION: The TriPath PREP system offers a reliable preparation of urine and has potential for other nongynecologic specimens, provided that careful attention is paid to technical details and some adjustments are made to account for specimen variability.     

Enhancing recovery of endocervical component on gynecologic cytology specimens processed by thin-layer technology

OBJECTIVE: To address the causes and report the corrective measures required for resolving the initial problem of high rates of cervical vaginal cytology specimens reported as having no endocervical component on SurePath (AutoCyte, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) liquid-based, thin-layer technology at an academic center cytology laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of 511 cases lacking endocervical/transformation zone component out of 9,221 SurePath thin-layer gynecologic specimens processed in a one-year period. The study encompassed a review of sample collection techniques by physicians and nurses, specimen processing, cytologic features of endocervical/squamous metaplastic cells processed by the SurePath method and statistical analysis of endocervical cell recovery rates after implementation of corrective measures. RESULTS: Absence of endocervical/transformation zone component varied from an initial 18% in the first month to an average of 5.3% after corrective actions were implemented. Current rates of SurePath thin-layer specimens having no endocervical component are lower than those for conventional smears. CONCLUSION: Since SurePath was only recently introduced to the market, there are no previously published data addressing how to optimize the recovery of endocervical component on liquid-based, thin-layer specimens processed by this methodology.     

Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices

OBJECTIVE: To examine cells that were retained on sampling devices used to collect ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A) Pap smears in order to evaluate both the number and significance of cells that are routinely discarded with these devices after liquid-based specimens are collected. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred Pap smears from 100 women were prospectively procured after gynecologic Pap smears were collected for the ThinPrep Pap test. The sampling end of the collection devices was cut off and placed in a vial that contained SUREPATH preservative fluid (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A). The residual cell samples were processed using the SurePath PREPSTAIN slide processor (TriPath). A single liquid-based slide was prepared from the sampling devices from each of the 100 specimens collected. The slides produced from the discarded devices were reviewed for the following: squamous cells, endocervical component, epithelial cell abnormalities and miscellaneous findings. The slides prepared from the "throw-away" (TA) material were subsequently compared with the primary ThinPrep Pap smear slide. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of the TA samples had an equal or greater number of squamous cells per high-power microscopic field when compared to the primary ThinPrep slide, with 8% of the TA slides demonstrating greater overall cellularity. An endocervical component was present on 27 of 66 cervical samples (40.9%). Three of five cases (60%) interpreted as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance had similar cells on the TA slides. Two cases of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance had no abnormal cells on the TA slides. Twelve of 14 cases (85.71%) of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion contained similar cells on the TA slides. Two of four cases (50%) of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion also had similar abnormal cells on the TA slides. Miscellaneous findings included 1 case of benign endometrial cells and 4 Candida infections present on both preparations, along with 1 case of Trichomonas vaginalis organisms present on the ThinPrep slide only. In 1 specimen, several multinucleated histiocytic giant cells were present only on the TA slide. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens prepared from TA collecting devices used for the ThinPrep Pap test are less sensitive than the primary specimen for the detection of cervical lesions. This is in contrast to split-sample studies involving ThinPrep and conventional smears. Our study documented the presence of normal and abnormal cells discarded from ThinPrep sampling devices in a high percentage of cases. Discarded abnormal cells on the TA slides were, however, few when compared to the primary specimen, with only 1 exception involving a high grade lesion.     

Procedure for immunocytochemical detection of P16INK4A antigen in thin-layer, liquid-based specimens

OBJECTIVE: To develop a procedure for the immunocytochemical detection of P16INK4A in ThinPrep specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Archived ThinPrep, liquid-based cervical/endocervical cytology specimens (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) diagnosed as LSIL, HSIL and WNL were resampled and fixed in 95% ethanol for at least three days. Rehydration and endogenous peroxidase blocking of both ThinPreps and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were accomplished on a Leica Autostainer (Leica, Deerfield, Illinois, U.S.A.). Microwave antigen retrieval with CitraPlus (Biogenex, San Ramon, California, U.S.A.) was performed using a Panasonic microwave oven (Matsushita Cooking Appliances, Franklin Park, Illinois, U.S.A.) on the high setting twice for five minutes each. After cooling for 20 minutes and undergoing a buffer rinse, the slides were placed in a Dako autostainer (Dako-USA, Carpinteria, California, U.S.A.). The P16INK4A primary antibody, clone E6H4 (MTM Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) was diluted 1:200 in antibody diluent buffer. Detection was accomplished with a mouse non-avidin-biotin EnVision+ polymer (Dako). The expression of P16INK4A in ThinPreps and corresponding biopsies were scored by two pathologists. A ThinPrep case was scored as positive if it contained > 10 abnormal cells with nuclear and cytoplasmic immunocytochemical staining. Corresponding biopsies were scored as exhibiting negative, sporadic, focal or diffuse staining, as described by Klaes et al, Overexpression of P16INK4A as specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri (Int J Cancer 2001;92:276-284). RESULTS: The P16INK4A antibody assay was positive in 14 of 19 (73.68%) LSIL ThinPrep cases and in 25 of 26 (96.15%) HSIL ThinPrep cases. Thirty-eight of the 39 (97.44%) biopsies corresponding to the positively stained ThinPreps also were positive, with a staining score of at least focal positivity in the dysplastic regions. The P16INK4A antibody assay was negative in 5 of 19 (26.32%) LSIL ThinPrep cases and negative in 1 of 26 (3.85%) HSIL ThinPrep cases. The six biopsies corresponding to the negative ThinPreps were similarly negative. The two cytologic specimens diagnosed as WNL were negative for P16INK4A, as were two tissue control cases with benign diagnoses. Nondysplastic squamous epithelium, identified in 17 biopsy cases, did not stain, nor did nondysplastic squamous cells identified in ThinPrep cases. Sporadic staining of bacteria, inflammatory cells and occasional endocervical glandular cells was identified. CONCLUSION: P16INK4A expression in ThinPrep specimens correlates with tissue expression of P16INK4A, as implemented in the above protocol. P16INK4A may thus serve as a surrogate marker in gynecologic cytology for high-risk HPV infection and for the development of cervical neoplasia.     

Proteomic analysis of high-grade dysplastic cervical cells obtained from ThinPrep slides using laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry

The purpose of this discovery phase study was to identify candidate protein biomarkers for high-grade dysplastic cervical cells using mass spectrometry. Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) was utilized to isolate high-grade dysplastic and normal cells from ThinPrep slides prepared from cervical cytological specimens. Following cell capture, samples were solubilized and proteins separated by gel electrophoresis in preparation for enzymatic digestion and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis (LC-MS). Processed samples were subsequently analyzed using a linear ion trap coupled with a Fourier transform mass spectrometer (LTQ-FT MS). It was determined that both PreservCyt Solution and ThinPrep Pap Stain (Cytyc Corporation) were compatible with the sample processing and LC-MS analysis. In total, from 9 normal and 9 abnormal cervical cytological specimens, more than 1000 unique proteins were identified with high confidence, based on approximately 12,000 captured cells per specimen. Quantitative protein differences between HSIL (High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion) and NILM (Negative for Intraepithelial Lesions or Malignancy) samples were determined by comparing the intensities of the representative (label-free) peptide ions. More than 200 proteins were found to exhibit a 3-fold difference in protein level. Interestingly, significant up-regulation of nuclear and mitochondrial proteins in HSIL specimens was noted. In several cases, the increased protein abundance observed in high-grade cells, as determined by quantitative LC-MS, was validated by immunocytochemical methods using ThinPrep cervical specimens. With the study of additional clinical specimens, the differential abundance of proteins in high-grade dysplastic cells versus morphologically normal cervical cells may lead to validated novel biomarkers for cervical disease.     

Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ThinPrep Imaging System (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough Massachusetts, U.S.A) to manual screening in the detection of cervical squamous epithelial lesion (SIL). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 27,525 manually screened ThinPrep Pap tests were compared with 27,725 imaged ThinPrep Pap tests for: (1) diagnostic rates of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, cannot rule out high grade SIL (ASC-H); low grade SIL and high grade SIL (HSIL); (2) ASC/SIL ratio; (3) high-risk HPV positivity for ASC; and (4) biopsy follow-up for ASC-H and HSIL. RESULTS: There were significant increases in the percentage of cytologic diagnoses in all categories with the imager. The ASC/SIL ratios of both groups were comparable. There was a significant decrease in HPV positivity in the imager group of ASC. Biopsy results confirmed a significant increase in the detection of HSIL in both the ASC-H and HSIL groups of the imaged cohort. CONCLUSION: The ThinPrep Imaging System is significantly better than manual screening in the detection of cervical SIL.     

Comparison of DNA extraction from cervical cells collected in PreservCyt solution for the amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate three methods of DNA extraction for the amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis in uterine cervical samples collected in PreservCyt solution. ThinPrep is the trade name for the slide preparation. METHODS: Thirty-eight samples collected in LCx buffer medium, which were identified as C. trachomatis infected by ligase chain reaction (LCR), were selected for this study. DNA from the PreservCyt samples was extracted by three methods: (i) QIAamp kit, (ii) boiling in Tris-EDTA buffer with Chelex purification, and (iii) Proteinase K digestion with Chelex purification. Sample DNA was tested for the presence of C. trachomatis by PCR using cryptic plasmid research (CTP) primers and major outer membrane protein research momp gene (MOMP) primers. Real-time (LightCycler) PCR for relative C. trachomatis quantification following DNA extraction was performed using primers (Hsp 60) for the 60 kDa heat-shock protein hsp60 gene. RESULTS: Amplification using CTP primers was the most successful with each of the extraction protocols. Boiling in buffer was the least successful extraction method. QIAamp was the best extraction method, yielding the most positives with both the CTP and MOMP primers. Proteinase K-Chelex extraction gave similar sensitivity to QIAamp extraction with CTP primers but lower for MOMP primers. CONCLUSIONS: The DNA extraction method must be carefully selected to ensure that larger PCR amplicons can be successfully produced by PCR and to ensure high sensitivity of detection of C. trachomatis. In this study it was found that the QIAamp extraction method followed by PCR with the CTP primers was the most successful for amplification of C. trachomatis DNA.     

Cyclin E expression and early cervical neoplasia in ThinPrep specimens. A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cyclin E expression as a possible marker for early cervical neoplasia using ThinPrep gynecologic specimens from premenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: Archived ThinPrep liquid-based cervical/endocervical specimens (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) diagnosed as human papillomavirus infection (HPV) (20), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (48) and within normal limits (WNL)/benign cellular changes (BCC) (21) were resampled in duplicate, fixed in 95% ethanol, subjected to immunocytochemical staining with the cyclin E antibody (clone 13A3, Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.) and HPV antibody (clone K1H8, Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, California, U.S.A.) and the expression scored by two pathologists and correlated with the cytologic diagnosis. A case was scored as positive if it contained > 10 abnormal squamous cells with nuclear immunocytochemical staining. RESULTS: The cylin E antibody assay was positive in 20 (100%) cases cytologically diagnosed as HPV. These cases were also anti-HPV antibody positive. Four cases (19%) cytologically diagnosed as WNL/BCC were cyclin E positive. Of these, two were anti-HPV antibody positive. Thirty-four (73%) cases cytologically diagnosed as ASCUS were positive for the cyclin E assay and for anti-HPV antibody staining. CONCLUSION: Cyclin E expression correlates strongly with morphologic features of HPV in ThinPrep specimens and may serve as a surrogate marker for HPV infection and early cervical preneoplastic lesions.     

Comparative analysis of a liquid-based Pap test and concurrent HPV DNA assay of residual samples. A study of 608 cases

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively study the HPV DNA assay of residual samples from the ThinPrep Pap Test (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) PreserveCyt (Cytyc) vial as a quality improvement (QI) indicator for management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Six hundred eight residual sample vials of liquid-based Pap-Test specimens were selected for the study based on Pap-test results from October 1998 to March 2001. The specimen vials were forwarded to the reference laboratory (American Medical Laboratories, Chantilly, Virginia, U.S.A.) for HPV DNA assay using the Hybrid Capture System method (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.). At the time of HPV DNA assay, the residual samples were between 8 days to 10 months old, and each vial contained 4 mL. Of the 608 study cases, 76 were WNL, 115 contained BCC, 172 contained ASCUS, 179 were LSIL and 66 were HSIL. In this study, the 191 WNL and BCC cases were designated as the disease-free control group. The HPV DNA typing results were reported as low-risk, high/intermediate-risk or HPV DNA "not detected" HPV types. The HPV DNA testing results were compared to the Pap-Test diagnoses and statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: The following information reflects the percentage of HPV DNA-positive cases based on the Pap-Test diagnoses: 16.2% in WNL and BCC, 51.1% in ASCUS, 94.4% in LSIL and 98.4% in HSIL. Sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%), false negative value (4.4%), false positive value (16.2%) and predictive value of a positive (88.3%) and negative (93.5%) Pap-Test were calculated on the basis of HPV DNA testing results for 436 cases that were diagnosed as either SIL or negative (WNL and BCC). ASCUS (172) Pap-Test cases were considered borderline--disease positive and excluded from statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: The HPV DNA assay of residual samples from ThinPrep Pap-Test liquid-based specimens is an objective adjunct to the gynecologic cytology QI protocol and is the gold standard reference test for triaging women with equivocal cytologic diagnoses. The great value of HPV DNA testing is its high sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%) and negative predictive value (93.5%). HPV DNA testing results can be used as a tool to better determine the need for referrals for colposcopic biopsy, especially for patients with an ASCUS diagnosis. The residual Pap-Test specimens are stable and reproducible for HPV DNA typing. A working flow chart for our gynecologic cytology QI program was produced from the Pap-Test and HPV DNA assay results. This offer presents the added benefit of minimizing the problem of sample variation. The prevalence of HPV infection was 16.2% in this study.     

Experience with a thin-layer,liquid-based cervical cytologic screening method

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of a thin-layer cytology system for cervicovaginal screening in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-five hundred cervicovaginal split samples were processed with the traditional direct smearing method and with the ThinPrep Pap Test (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) method and evaluated according to the Bethesda system, focusing mainly on the cytomorphologic features. RESULTS: The ThinPrep Pap Test yielded improved specimen adequacy and an increased detection rate of squamous abnormalities, which resulted in a decrease in the ASCUS/SIL ratio. Moreover, the thin-layer system provided adequate material for concomitant HPV testing, mainly in the LSIL and the ASCUS favor SIL cases, with satisfactory results, as well as for cell block preparations in a few selected cases that presented diagnostic difficulties. Furthermore, the morphologic features of the LSIL cases were virtually identical on both preparations, while in the HSIL cases, distinct features were noted on ThinPrep. CONCLUSION: The ThinPrep Pap Test is significantly more effective than the conventional smear in clinical practice. However, training and experience are necessary to take full advantage of this promising new technology.     

Diagnostic value of fine needle aspirates processed by ThinPrep® for the assessment of axillary lymph node status in patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast

X. Jing, E. Wey and C. W. Michael Diagnostic value of fine needle aspirates processed by ThinPrep® for the assessment of axillary lymph node status in patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast Objective: To evaluate the utility of ThinPrep® as an optional specimen processing method for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis of invasive breast carcinoma. Methods: A computer SNOMED search from the file at our institution between January 2003 and August 2011 retrieved a total of 209 fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens of axillary lymph nodes prepared by ThinPrep and followed by axillary lymph node biopsy and/or dissection. Original cytological diagnoses and corresponding histological diagnoses were documented. Using the histological diagnoses as the gold standard, the diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Both cytology and histology slides from cyto‐histologically discrepant cases were reviewed. Results: Out of a total of 209 specimens, 193 (92%) had adequate diagnostic material while the remaining 16 specimens (8%) were inadequate for cytological assessment. The diagnostic specimens included 168 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), 15 invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) and 10 mixed carcinomas (IDC and ILC). Excluding 19 cases with malignant cells on FNA in which no residual tumour was found in fibrotic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy (cytology and histology confirmed on review) ThinPrep detected nodal metastasis with an overall sensitivity of 77.5%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100% and NPV of 53.7%. Diagnostic accuracy was 82.2%. There was no difference in Bloom–Richardson grade or the number or size of metastases between tumours with true‐positive and false‐negative cytology. Sampling error was the sole factor contributing to cyto‐histological discrepancy. Conclusions: ThinPrep is a good alternative to the conventional smear for cytological assessment of axillary lymph node status in patients with invasive breast carcinoma, particularly when specimens are collected at remote sites or when cytologists are not available for assistance during FNA.     

A thin-layer,liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional,comparative study

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the accuracy of the ThinPrep Pap Test (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) on the basis of histologic diagnosis by biopsy and the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in mass screening. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1,997 women residing in Xiangyuan County, Shanxi Province, P.R.C., an area with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma, were enrolled in this study. We collected exfoliative cervical samples from all subjects into a liquid buffer (Preserv-Cyt [Cytyc]) and utilized for both cytologic screening using the ThinPrep Pap Test and HPV DNA testing. Subsequent colposcopic biopsies were taken on all subjects. All the tests were performed in an independent and blinded fashion. We compared the ThinPrep Pap test with colposcopic biopsy and HPV test. RESULTS: High grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (CIN 2/3) were identified in 74 (3.7%) of 1,993 women adequately assessed, and there were 12 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The false negative rate of ThinPrep cytology was 3.2% for biopsy-confirmed CIN 3 and 9.3% for CIN 2. Twenty-seven (87%) of the 31 women with biopsy-confirmed CIN 3 and 12 (100%) of 12 with biopsy-confirmed SCC had a diagnosis of either HSIL or greater abnormalities on ThinPrep cytology. In addition, the HPV DNA detection rates offered a good correlation between cytology and biopsy. CONCLUSION: The ThinPrep Pap performed extremely well in this primary screening trial. We found a good correlation between ThinPrep cytology and colposcopic biopsy on detection of HSIL and SCC; cervical specimens collected in ThinPrep liquid buffer serve as a direct test for HPV as well.     

Diagnosis of metastatic tumors in cerebrospinal fluid samples using thin-layer cytology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) and present our experience using LBC in the diagnosis of metastatic tumors in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. STUDY DESIGN: We examined 38 cytologic specimens of CSF, processed by ThinPrep technique. Of these, 18 presented with a previously diagnosed primary malignancy. Various immunocytochemical markers were performed. RESULTS: ThinPrep technology provided preservation of cytomorphologic features, high cellularity per slide and clear background. Analysis revealed 8 breast carcinomas, 5 lung carcinomas, 4 lymphomas, 3 adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, 1 squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix and 1 urinary bladder carcinoma. Fifteen samples were negative for malignancy. CONCLUSION: CSF cytology is the only examination that verifies the presence of malignancy. Thin monolayer technology is suggested as an appropriate diagnostic method for metastatic tumors in CSF in everyday routine and seems to be a valuable tool for further management and planning of treatment.     

Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait

OBJECTIVE: To compare ThinPrep (TP) Papanicolaou smears (Cytyc Corp., Box-borough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) with matching conventional Papanicolaou (CP) smears for specimen adequacy, cytologic quality, diagnostic accuracy and screening time. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study of 1,024 women a split-sample, matched-pair design in favor of CP slides based on single-blind criteria was followed with a smear on a glass slide for CP and the remaining material collected in Preserv-Cyt solution (Cytyc) for a TP smear. A Cytobrush (Medscand, Hollywood, Florida, U.S.A.) was used for smear preparation for CP. TP smears were processed in ThinPrep 2000 (Cytyc). Smears were stained with Papanicolaou stain and were interpreted according to the Bethesda system. RESULTS: The number of satisfactory but limited (SBL) cases with TP were 77 (7.5%) as compared to 127 (12.4%) with the CP method. This reduction in SBL smears with the TP method and consequent increase in satisfactory smears were highly significant (P < .001) by McNemar's test. As regards unsatisfactory smears in discordant pairs, although the number of unsatisfactory smears was higher with TP (41 cases) as against CP (27 cases), the difference was not statistically significant (P < .05). The split-sample method showed a high correlation between the CP and TP diagnoses. TP smears had a significant advantage over CP smears in the reduction in the number of ASCUS and AGUS cases (14 vs. 29) (P < .05) and increased the pickup rate of LSIL, 6 vs. 1. Time taken to screen the TP smears was half that of CP smears. No cases of LSIL or HSIL were missed on TP smears. CONCLUSION: The liquid-based processor significantly improved the adequacy and quality of smears, resulting in fewer recall cases for SBL smears, leading to more definitive diagnoses in atypical cases, increasing the pickup rate of LSILs and reducing the screening time. A machine handling multiple specimens automatically would decrease cost and be an asset to a cytopathology laboratory.     

A Comparison of Preparation Techniques in Taxonomic Studies of Longidorus africanus Merny

A comparison was made of ten different techniques for killing, fixing, and mounting Longidorus africanus Merny for microscopic study. The most satisfactory specimens were those killed by Seinhorst''s method, fixed in FAA and mounted in glycerin by the slow method. Specimens killed by "gentle heat," fixed in FAA and mounted in glycerin were also acceptable as were those killed by hot formalin and mounted in glycerin or processed by Baker''s method. Less satisfactory were: nematodes killed by "gentle heat," fixed in formalin and mounted in glycerin and specimens killed by vapor phase perfusion or by Hopper''s lethal stain, both latter groups were mounted in glycerin after fixation in formalin. Killing with cold formalin, gradual heat (60 C for 15 min), or by storage in distilled water produced poorly defined specimens. Nematodes killed by hot formalin, and processed to glycerin by the slow method, maintained their live dimensions. Reduction in length occurred in specimens killed by cold formalin, by storage, or treated with solutions containing acetic or propionic acids. Nematodes processed by Baker''s method increased in size. Other minor modifications occurred in specimens processed by the different methods. Esophageal definition was best in nematodes killed with formalin, hot or cold. There is no correlation between position of the posterior part of the esophagus and position of the onchiostyle.