Dynamics of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Rates of turnover for the posttranslational acetylation of core histones were measured in logarithmically growing yeast cells by radioactive acetate labeling to near steady-state conditions. On average, acetylation half-lives were approximately 15 min for histone H4, 10 min for histone H3, 4 min for histone H2B, and 5 min for histone H2A. These rates were much faster than the several hours that have previously been reported for the rate of general histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. The current estimates are in line with changes in histone acetylation detected directly at specific chromatin locations and the speed of changes in gene expression that can be observed. These results emphasize that histone acetylation within chromatin is subject to constant flux. Detailed analysis revealed that the turnover rates for acetylation of histone H3 are the same from mono- through penta-acetylated forms. A large fraction of acetylated histone H3, including possibly all tetra- and penta-acetylated forms, appears subject to acetylation turnover. In contrast, the rate of acetylation turnover for mono- and di-acetylated forms of histones H4 and H2B, and the fraction subject to acetylation turnover, was lower than for multi-acetylated forms of these histones. This difference may reflect the difference in location of these histones within the nucleosome, a difference in the spectrum of histone-specific acetylating and deacetylating enzymes, and a difference in the role of acetylation in different histones.     

Enzymic acetylation of nucleosome histone.

Rat liver chromatin prepared from purified nuclei catalyzed the acetylation of histones in nucleosomes at the same level as that of nuclei. The activity of histone acetyltransferase in chromatin was destroyed by heat treatment at 65 degrees C for 5 min. Histones in exogenously added nucleosomes also served as substrate for the enzyme. The sites of acetylation in the nucleosomes appeared to be in the trypsin-digestable N-terminal regions of histones H4, H3, and H2A, as has been reported in an in vivo system.     

Porcine liver nuclear histone acetyltransferase. Partial purification and basic properties

The major histone acetyltransferase activity from porcine liver nuclei has been isolated and partially purified by a simple, rapid, and reproducible method. Extraction of nuclei in buffered 30% saturated ammonium sulfate and subsequent ammonium sulfate fractionation, chromatography on DEAE-Sephacel and hydroxylapatite, and ultracentrifugation on linear 15-30% glycerol gradients provides an 8650-fold purification (over nuclei) in 42% yield. The molecular weight of the enzyme is approximately 94,000 as determined by glycerol gradient ultracentrifugation and gel filtration on Sephacryl S-200. The optimum pH for the reaction is 7.5 and the activity is inhibited by monovalent and divalent salts and by sulfhydryl blocking reagents. The enzyme activity is substantially protected from thermal denaturation at 37 degrees C by the addition of glycerol to the incubation medium. In the presence of the core histones, the enzyme catalyzes the acetylation reaction in the order H3 greater than H4 greater than H2B greater than H2A; the order for histones bound in nucleosome core particles is H4 greater than H2B greater than H3 greater than H2A. The high mobility group proteins 14 and 17 serve as substrates for the enzyme in vitro, suggesting a possible role for enzymatic high mobility group acetylation in chromatin function.     

High-mobility group and other nonhistone substrates for nuclear histoneN-acetyltransferase

A variety of nonhistone proteins and polyamines has been studied for their substrate activity for nuclear histone N-acetyltransferase. Nonhistone chromatin high-mobility group (HMG) proteins are found to be as good a substrate for the enzyme as histones. The enzyme also acetylates spermidine and spermine. However, protamine, bovine serum albumin, and ubiquitin are not substrates. Chymotryptic peptides of histone and HMGs retained about 64% of the substrate activity, but trypsin treatment reduced the substrate activity by more than 85%. Both N-acetyltransferase activities for HMGs and histones are copurified through salt extraction, polyethylene glycol fractionation, and chromatography on DEAE-cellulose, phosphocellulose columns, and a HPLC anionic-exchange column. The highly purified nuclear histone acetyltransferase shows similar optimal pH and ping-pong kinetics for both HMGs and histones. The Km for HMG is 0.25 mg/ml. HMGs are able to accept the acetyl group from isolated acetyl-enzyme intermediate. Denatured gel analysis shows that HMG 1 and HMG 2 are the major proteins acetylated. High salt concentrations, mononucleotides, and DNA, which inhibit histone substrate activity of the enzyme, also inhibit HMG substrate activity. These observations suggest that there is a major nuclear N-acetyltransferase which is responsible for the acetylation of both histones and HMGs and perhaps also of spermine and spermidine. Thus the regulation of the structure and function of chromatin through postsynthetic acetylation can be achieved by a single nuclear N-acetyltransferase.     

Calf liver nuclear N-acetyltransferases. Purification and properties of two enzymes with both spermidine acetyltransferase and histone acetyltransferase activities.

Calf liver contains two nuclear N-acetyltransferases which are separated by chromatography on hydroxylapatite. Both acetyltransferase A and acetyltransferase B will transfer acetate from acetyl-CoA to either histone or spermidine. The same protein catalyzes the reaction with both substrates; this is shown by a constant ratio of spermidine to histone activity over a 5,000-fold purification and identical heat denaturation kinetics for both spermidine and histone acetyltransferase activity with each enzyme. Histone is preferentially acetylated when both acceptors are present. Both enzymes preferentially acetylate polyamines (spermidine, spermine, and diaminodipropylamine) to diamines. Acetyltransferase A acetylates histones in the order: whole histone greater than H4 greater than H2A greater than H3 greater than H2B greater than H1; acetyltransferase B in the order: whole histone greater than H4 = H3 greater than H2A greater than H2B greater than H1. Michaelis constants are 2 X 10(-4)M for spermidine and 9 X 10(-6)M for acetyl-CoA. Acetyltransferase A has a molecular weight of 150,000; acetyltransferase B 175,000. Both enzymes are strongly inhibited by p-chloromercuribenzoate and weakly inhibited by EDTA.     

Eaf1 is the platform for NuA4 molecular assembly that evolutionarily links chromatin acetylation to ATP-dependent exchange of histone H2A variants

Eaf1 (for Esa1-associated factor 1) and Eaf2 have been identified as stable subunits of NuA4, a yeast histone H4/H2A acetyltransferase complex implicated in gene regulation and DNA repair. While both SWI3-ADA2-N-CoR-TF IIIB domain-containing proteins are required for normal cell cycle progression, their depletion does not affect the global Esa1-dependent acetylation of histones. In contrast to all other subunits, Eaf1 is found exclusively associated with the NuA4 complex in vivo. It serves as a platform that coordinates the assembly of functional groups of subunits into the native NuA4 complex. Eaf1 shows structural similarities with human p400/Domino, a subunit of the NuA4-related TIP60 complex. On the other hand, p400 also possesses an SWI2/SNF2 family ATPase domain that is absent from the yeast NuA4 complex. This domain is highly related to the yeast Swr1 protein, which is responsible for the incorporation of histone variant H2AZ in chromatin. Since all of the components of the TIP60 complex are homologous to SWR1 or NuA4 subunits, we proposed that the human complex corresponds to a physical merge of two yeast complexes. p400 function in TIP60 then would be accomplished in yeast by cooperation between SWR1 and NuA4. In agreement with such a model, NuA4 and SWR1 mutants show strong genetic interactions, NuA4 affects histone H2AZ incorporation/acetylation in vivo, and both preset the PHO5 promoter for activation. Interestingly, the expression of a chimeric Eaf1-Swr1 protein recreates a single human-like complex in yeast cells. Our results identified the key central subunit for the structure and functions of the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and functionally linked this activity with the histone variant H2AZ from yeast to human cells.     

Effect of the supranucleosomal chromatin organization on histone-DNA interrelations

It has been demonstrated by the method of competitive displacement of own chromatin histone by excess total histone that chromatin dispersity influence the strength of histone-DNA interactions in a medium of physiological ionic strength. Histone NI was removed from chromatin after the quantity of total histone added to chromatin was equivalent to that existing in chromatin. The proportion of histones H2A and H2B removed from chromatin was increased after mechanical of ultrasonic degradation of chromatin at 5-20-fold excess of total extra-histone. In some histone preparations, the removal of histones H2A and H2B was not detectable at even 200-fold excess of total histone. This may be explained by strengthening histone-DNA interactions in superhelical loops of chromatin.     

Differential Histone Acetylation in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Due to Growth in NaCl : Responses in Salt Stressed and Salt Tolerant Callus Cultures

The steady state distribution of histone variant proteins and their modifications by acetylation were characterized in wild type and salinity stress adapted alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Isotopic labeling detected dynamic acetylation at four sites in the histone H3 variants and five sites in histones H4 and H2B. Histone variant H3.2 was the most highly acetylated histone with 25% higher steady state acetylation and a two- to threefold higher acetylation labeling than histone H3.1. Histone phosphorylation was limited to histone variants H1.A, H1.B, and H1.C and to histone H2A.3, which was also acetylated. Histone variant composition was unaffected by cellular exposure to NaCl. Histone acetylation was qualitatively similar in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cells under normal growth conditions. However, short term salt stress in salt sensitive cells or continued growth at 1% NaCl in salt tolerant cells led to major increases in the multiacetylated forms of histone H4 and the two variants of histone H3. These changes were more pronounced in the diploid than in the tetraploid alfalfa strains. The increase in multiacetylation of core histones serves as an in vivo reporter suggesting an altered intranuclear ionic environment in the presence of salt. It may also represent an adaptive response in chromatin structure to permit chromatin function in a more saline intranuclear environment.     

Modification of histone binding in calf thymus chromatin and in the chromatin-protamine complex by acetic anhydride.

A relationship between side-chain modification of histones and their displaceability from DNA has been investigated using calf thymus chromatin which was chemically acetylated with acetic anhydride. When the chromatin is treated with increasingly higher concentrations of the reagent, histones become acetylated to an increasingly greater extent, attaining the modification at 23-24 sites for histone I, 5-6 for IIb1, 9-10 for IIb2, 5-6 for III and 3-4 for IV. As the chromatin becomes more acetylated, NaCl concentrations required for histone removal are lowered. Saturation binding of protamine does not bring about either an increase in the number of acetylation sites of histones in chromatin or a decrease of the NaCl requirement for dissociation of the acetylated chromatins. A comparison of the present results with the extents of histone acetylation known to occur enzymatically in vivo indicates that the complete removal of somatic histones during transformation of chromatin in spermiogenesis cannot be explained on the basis of decreased binding of the histone to DNA by acetylation or by a combination of acetylation and protamine binding, suggesting that the displacement process may require some additional processes.