非洲爪蟾卵母细胞GABAB和GABAc受体介导的电流反应

实验应用双电极电压箝技术,在具有滤泡膜的非洲爪蟾(Xenopuslaevis)卵母细胞上记录到γ-氨基丁酸(γ-aminobutyricacid,GABA)-激活电流。此GABA-激活电流的特点及有关GABA受体类型的研究和分析如下(1)在35.5%(55/155)的受检细胞外加GABA可引起一慢的浓度依赖性的外向电流。(2)GABAA受体的选择性拮抗剂bicuculline(10     

Behavioral inhibition of circadian responses to light.

Circadian locomotor rhythms in rodents may be synchronized by either photic or nonphotic events that produce phase shifts of the rhythm. Little is known, however, about how these two types of stimuli interact to produce entrainment. The well-characterized circadian photic response of the golden hamster was examined in situations where a short light pulse and locomotor activity, a nonphotic event, occurred simultaneously. Light-induced phase advances were attenuated when animals were active during light exposure. The results show that circadian responses to light depend upon the environmental situation in which the light is given, and call into question the implicit assumption in circadian rhythm research that phase shifting and entrainment to light-dark cycles depend simply on photic activation of well-known retinofugal pathways. Moreover, since light therapy is becoming an important component in the treatment of circadian-based disorders in humans, the results emphasize the need for evaluation of the behavioral aspects of light therapy protocols.     

Intracellular trafficking of GABA(A) receptors

Some of the mechanisms that control the intracellular trafficking of GABA(A) receptors have recently been described. Following the synthesis of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits in the endoplasmic reticulum, ternary receptor complexes assemble slowly and are inefficiently inserted into surface membranes of heterologous cells. While beta3, beta4, and gamma2S subunits appear to contain polypeptide sequences that alone are sufficient for surface targeting, these sequences are neither conserved nor essential for surface expression of heteromeric GABA(A) receptors formed from alpha1beta or alpha1betagamma subunits. At the neuronal surface, native GABA(A) receptor clustering and synaptic targeting require a gamma2 subunit and the participation of gephyrin, a clustering protein for glycine receptors. A linker protein, such as the GABA(A) receptor associated protein (GABARAP), may be necessary for the formation of GABA(A) receptor aggregates containing gephyrin. A substantial fraction of surface receptors are sequestered by endocytosis, another process which apparently requires a GABA(A) receptor gamma2 subunit. In heterologous cells, constitutive endocytosis seems to predominate while, in cortical neurons, internalization is evoked when receptors are occupied by GABA(A) agonists. After constitutive endocytosis, receptors are relatively stable and can be rapidly recycled to the cell surface, a process that may be regulated by protein kinase C. On the other hand, a portion of the intracellular GABA(A) receptors derived from ligand-dependent endocytosis is apparently degraded. The clustering of GABA(A) receptors at synapses and at coated pits are two mechanisms that may compete for a pool of diffusable receptors, providing a model for plasticity at inhibitory synapses.     

Modeling the role of mid-wavelength cones in circadian responses to light

Nonvisual responses to light, such as photic entrainment of the circadian clock, involve intrinsically light-sensitive melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells as well as rod and cone photoreceptors. However, previous studies have been unable to demonstrate a specific contribution of cones in the photic control of circadian responses to light. Using a mouse model that specifically lacks mid-wavelength (MW) cones we show that these photoreceptors play a significant role in light entrainment and in phase shifting of the circadian oscillator. The contribution of MW cones is mainly observed for light exposures of short duration and toward the longer wavelength region of the spectrum, consistent with the known properties of this opsin. Modeling the contributions of the various photoreceptors stresses the importance of considering the particular spectral, temporal, and irradiance response domains of the photopigments when assessing their role and contribution in circadian responses to light.     

Effects of the duper mutation on circadian responses to light

The circadian mutation duper in Syrian hamsters shortens the free-running circadian period (τ(DD)) by 2 hours when expressed on a tau mutant (τ(ss)) background and by 1 hour on a wild-type background. We have examined the effects of this mutation on phase response curves and entrainment. In contrast to wild types, duper hamsters entrained to 14L:10D with a positive phase angle. Super duper hamsters (expressing duper on a τ(ss) background) showed weak entrainment, while τ(ss) animals either completely failed to entrain or showed sporadic entrainment with episodes of relative coordination. As previously reported, wild-type and τ(ss) hamsters show low amplitude resetting in response to 15-minute light pulses after short-term (10 days) exposure to DD. In contrast, super duper hamsters show high amplitude resetting. This effect is attributable to the duper allele, as hamsters carrying duper on a wild-type background also show large phase shifts. Duper mutants that were born and raised in DD also showed high amplitude resetting in response to 15-minute light pulses, indicating that the effect of the mutation on PRC amplitude is not an aftereffect of entrainment to 14L:10D. Hamsters that are heterozygous for duper do not show amplified resetting curves, indicating that for this property, as for determination of free-running period, the mutant allele is recessive. In a modified Aschoff type II protocol, super duper and duper hamsters show large phase shifts as soon as the second day of DD. Despite the amplification of the PRC in super duper hamsters, the induction of Period1 gene expression in the SCN by light is no greater in these mutants than in wild-type animals. Period2 expression in the SCN did not differ between super duper and wild-type hamsters exposed to light at CT15, but albumin site D-binding protein (Dbp) mRNA showed higher basal levels and greater light induction in the SCN of super duper compared to wild-type animals. These results indicate that the duper mutation alters the amplitude of the circadian oscillator and further distinguish it from the tau mutation.     

A GABA(B) mystery: the search for pharmacologically distinct GABA(B) receptors

The classification of neurotransmitter receptors into distinct pharmacological subtypes is of major importance in drug discovery. This quest is particularly important for neurotransmitter systems that are widely distributed. Because gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors, both GABA(A) and GABA(B), are found throughout the neuroaxis, they are likely involved in all central nervous system functions. Accordingly, the therapeutic promise of GABA(B) receptor manipulation depends upon the identification of subtypes than can be specifically targeted.     

GABA(A) receptors in aging and Alzheimer's disease

In this article we present a comprehensive review of relevant research and reports on the GABA_A receptor in the aged and Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. In comparison to glutamatergic and cholinergic systems, the GABAergic system is relatively spared in AD, but the precise mechanisms underlying differential vulnerability are not well understood. Using several methods, investigations demonstrate that despite resistance of the GABAergic system to neurodegeneration, particular subunits of the GABA_A receptor are altered with age and AD, which can induce compensatory increases in GABA_A receptor subunits within surrounding cells. We conclude that although aging- and disease-related changes in GABA_A receptor subunits may be modest, the mechanisms that compensate for these changes may alter the pharmacokinetic and physiological properties of the receptor. It is therefore crucial to understand the subunit composition of individual GABA_A receptors in the diseased brain when developing therapeutics that act at these receptors.     

Subunit specificity and interaction domain between GABA(A) receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) and GABA(A) receptors

GABARAP (GABA(A) receptor-associated protein) interacts with both microtubules and GABA(A) receptors in vitro and in vivo and is capable of modulating receptor channel kinetics. In this study, we use the intracellular loop of 15 GABA(A) receptor subunits to show that the interaction between GABARAP and GABA(A) receptor is specific for the gamma subunits. Pharmacological characterization of proteins purified by GABARAP affinity column indicates that native GABA(A) receptors interact with GABARAP. Quantitative yeast two-hybrid assays were used to identify the interaction domain in the gamma2 subunit for GABARAP binding, and to identify the interaction domain in GABARAP for GABA(A) receptor binding. A peptide corresponding to the GABARAP interaction domain in the gamma2 subunit was used to inhibit the interaction between GABARAP and the gamma2 subunit. In addition, the ability of GABARAP to promote cluster formation of recombinant receptors expressed in QT-6 fibroblasts was inhibited by a membrane-permeable form of this peptide in a time-dependent manner. The establishment of a model for GABARAP-induced clustering of GABA(A) receptors in living cells and the identification of subunit specificity and interaction domains in the interaction between GABARAP and GABA(A) receptors is a step in dissecting the function of GABARAP in GABA(A) receptor clustering and/or targeting.     

The role of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors in the control of GnRH release in anestrous ewes

The paper reviews data concerning the involvement of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors in the control of GnRH secretion in anestrous ewes. Generally, GABA influences the GnRH release through GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors located on perikaria of the GnRH neurons in the preoptic area (MPOA) or through the influence on beta-endorphinergic and catecholaminergic systems activity in MPOA and in ventromedial-infundibular region of the hypothalamus (VEN/NI). Stimulation of GABA(A) receptors in VEN/NI and MPOA attenuates GnRH release, while activation of GABA(B) receptors in MPOA decreases GnRH secretion, and in VEN/NI increases concentration of GnRH. The different neural mechanisms could be involved in this process: direct ligand action on the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors located on GnRH cells and axon terminals or indirect effect through the changes in the beta-endorphinergic and catecholaminergic systems activity in these structures of the brain.     

Sleep is differently modulated by basal forebrain GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors

There is evidence that GABA plays a major role in sleep regulation. GABA(A) receptor agonists and different compounds interacting with the GABA(A) receptor complex, such as barbiturates and benzodiazepines, can interfere with the sleep/wake cycle. On the other hand, there is very little information about the possible role of GABA(B) receptors in sleep modulation. The nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM), a cholinergic area in the basal forebrain, plays a pivotal role in the modulation of sleep and wakefulness, and both GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors have been described within the NBM. This study used unilateral infusions in the NBM to determine the effects of 3-hydroxy-5-aminomethylisoxazole hydrobromide (muscimol hydrobromide, a GABA(A) receptor subtype agonist) and beta-(aminomethyl)-4-chlorobenzenepropanoic acid (baclofen, a GABA(B) receptor subtype agonist) on sleep parameters in freely moving rats by means of polygraphic recordings. Muscimol (0.5 nmol) and baclofen (0.7 nmol) induced an increase in slow-wave sleep and an inhibition of wakefulness. Muscimol, but not baclofen, also caused a decrease in desynchronized sleep parameters. The results reported here indicate that 1) the NBM activation of both GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors influences the sleep/wake cycle, and 2) GABA(A) but not GABA(B) receptors are important for desynchronized sleep modulation, suggesting that the two GABAergic receptors play different roles in sleep modulation.     

Nonvisual responses to light exposure in the human brain during the circadian night

The brain processes light information to visually represent the environment but also to detect changes in ambient light level. The latter information induces non-image-forming responses and exerts powerful effects on physiology such as synchronization of the circadian clock and suppression of melatonin. In rodents, irradiance information is transduced from a discrete subset of photosensitive retinal ganglion cells via the retinohypothalamic tract to various hypothalamic and brainstem regulatory structures including the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei, the master circadian pacemaker. In humans, light also acutely modulates alertness, but the cerebral correlates of this effect are unknown. We assessed regional cerebral blood flow in 13 subjects attending to auditory and visual stimuli in near darkness following light exposures (>8000 lux) of different durations (0.5, 17, 16.5, and 0 min) during the biological night. The bright broadband polychromatic light suppressed melatonin and enhanced alertness. Functional imaging revealed that a large-scale occipito-parietal attention network, including the right intraparietal sulcus, was more active in proportion to the duration of light exposures preceding the scans. Activity in the hypothalamus decreased in proportion to previous illumination. These findings have important implications for understanding the effects of light on human behavior.     

Role of the GABA(A)beta2, GABA(A)alpha6, GABA(A)alpha1 and GABA(A)gamma2 receptor subunit genes cluster in drug responses and the development of alcohol dependence

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter of the central nervous system and it acts at the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors. A possible role for the GABA(A) receptors in alcohol action has been derived from in vitro cell models, animal studies and human research. GABA(A) subunit mRNA expression in cell models has suggested that the long form of the gamma2 subunit is essential for ethanol enhanced potentiation of GABA(A) receptors, by phosphorylation of a serine contained within the extra eight amino acids. Several animal studies have demonstrated that alterations in drug and alcohol responses may be caused by amino-acid differences at the GABA(A)alpha6 and GABA(A)gamma2 subunits. An Arg(100)/Glu(100) change at the GABA(A)alpha6 subunit conferring altered binding efficacy of the benzodiazepine inverse agonist Ro 15-4513, was found between the AT (alcohol tolerance) and ANT (alcohol non-tolerance) rats. Several loci related to alcohol withdrawal on mouse chromosome 11 which corresponds to the region containing four GABA(A) subunit (beta2, alpha6, alpha1 and gamma2) genes on human chromosome 5q33-34, were also identified. Gene knockout studies of the role of GABA(A)alpha6 and GABA(A)gamma2 subunit genes in mice have demonstrated an essential role in the modulation of other GABA(A) subunit expression and the efficacy of benzodiazepine binding. Absence of the GABA(A)gamma2 subunit gene has more severe effects with many of the mice dying shortly after birth. Disappointingly few studies have examined the effects of response to alcohol in these gene knockout mice. Human genetic association studies have suggested that the GABA(A)beta2, alpha6, alpha1 and gamma2 subunit genes have a role in the development of alcohol dependence, although their contributions may vary between ethnic group and phenotype. In summary, in vitro cell, animal and human genetic association studies have suggested that the GABA(A)beta2, alpha6, alpha1 and gamma2 subunit genes have an important role in alcohol related phenotypes (300 words).     

Phase and period responses of the circadian system of mice (Mus musculus) to light stimuli of different duration

To understand entrainment of circadian systems to different photoperiods in nature, it is important to know the effects of single light pulses of different durations on the free-running system. The authors studied the phase and period responses of laboratory mice (C57BL6J//OlaHsd) to single light pulses of 7 different durations (1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 h) given once per 11 days in otherwise constant darkness. Light-pulse duration affected both amplitude and shape of the phase response curve. Nine-hour light pulses yielded the maximal amplitude PRC. As in other systems, the circadian period slightly lengthened following delays and shortened following advances. The authors aimed to understand how different parts of the light signal contribute to the eventual phase shift. When PRCs were plotted using the onset, midpoint, and end of the pulse as a phase reference, they corresponded best with each other when using the mid-pulse. Using a simple phase-only model, the authors explored the possibility that light affects oscillator velocity strongly in the 1st hour and at reduced strength in later hours of the pulse due to photoreceptor adaptation. They fitted models based on the 1-h PRC to the data for all light pulses. The best overall correspondence between PRCs was obtained when the effect of light during all hours after the first was reduced by a factor of 0.22 relative to the 1st hour. For the predicted PRCs, the light action centered on average at 38% of the light pulse. This is close to the reference phase yielding best correspondence at 36% of the pulses. The result is thus compatible with an initial major contribution of the onset of the light pulse followed by a reduced effect of light responsible for the differences between PRCs for different duration pulses. The authors suggest that the mid-pulse is a better phase reference than lights-on to plot and compare PRCs of different light-pulse durations.     

GABA(B) receptors: from monogamy to promiscuity

The aim of this review is firstly to describe the current understanding of the diverse physiology and pharmacology of GABA(B) receptors in vivo. We will then focus on recent advances made, since the identification of the GABA(B) receptor subunit genes, in our knowledge of the molecular nature of the receptor, and the recently discovered molecular determinants of functions such as ligand binding, trafficking and signalling. We will conclude with a summary of the GABA(B) receptor-interacting proteins that have been described thus far, and discuss how these may, at least in part, account for the paradox of varied receptor pharmacology in the potential context of a single heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor.     

GABA spillover activates postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors to control rhythmic hippocampal activity

In the hippocampus, interneurons provide synaptic inhibition via the transmitter GABA, which can activate GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors (GABA(A)Rs and GABA(B)Rs). Generally, however, GABA released by a single interneuron activates only GABA(A)Rs on its targets, despite the abundance of GABA(B)RS. Here, I show that during hippocampal rhythmic activity, simultaneous release of GABA from several interneurons activates postsynaptic GABA(B)Rs and that block of GABA(B)Rs increases oscillation frequency. Furthermore, if GABA uptake is inhibited, even GABA released by a single interneuron is enough to activate GABA(B)Rs. This occurs also on cells not directly contacted by that interneuron, indicating that GABA has to overcome uptake and exit the synaptic cleft to reach GABA(B)RS. Thus, activation of extrasynaptic GABA(B)Rs by pooling of GABA is an important mechanism regulating hippocampal network activity.     

The regulation of UV-B responses by the circadian clock

The circadian clock modulates plant responses to environmental stimuli. In a recent study we showed that light and the circadian clock regulate daily changes in sensitivity to short treatments of high UV-B. Here we demonstrate that these time dependent changes in UV-B stress sensitivity are not mediated by the UV-B receptor UV RESISTANTCE LOCUS 8. We also discuss the potential mechanisms involved in this process and the role of the circadian clock in the acclimation to UV-B.     

Structure and subunit composition of GABA(A) receptors.

GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain and are the site of action of many clinically important drugs. These receptors are composed of five subunits that can belong to eight different subunit classes. If all GABA(A) receptor subunits could randomly combine with each other, an extremely large number of GABA(A) receptor subtypes with distinct subunit composition and arrangement would be formed. Depending on their subunit composition, these receptors would exhibit distinct pharmacological and electrophysiological properties. Recent evidence, however, indicates that not all subunits can assemble efficiently with each other and form functional homo- or hetero-oligomeric receptors. In addition, the efficiency of formation of hetero-oligomeric assembly intermediates determines the subunit stoichiometry and subunit arrangement for each receptor and thus further reduces the possible heterogeneity of GABA(A) receptors in the brain. Studies investigating the subunit composition of native GABA(A) receptors support this conclusion, but also indicate that receptors composed of one, two, three, four, or five different subunits might exist in the brain. Using a recently established immunodepletion technique, the subunit composition and quantitative importance of native GABA(A) receptor subtypes can be determined. This information, together with studies on the regional, cellular and subcellular distribution of these receptor subtypes, will be the basis for a rational development of drugs that specifically affect the GABAergic system.     

Developing dual functional allosteric modulators of GABA(A) receptors

Positive modulators at benzodiazepine sites of α2- and α3-containing GABA(A) receptors are believed to be anxiolytic. Negative allosteric modulators of α5-containing GABA(A) receptors enhance cognition. By oocyte two-electrode voltage clamp and subsequent structure-activity relationship studies, we discovered cinnoline and quinoline derivatives that were both positive modulators at α2-/α3-containing GABA(A) receptors and negative modulators at α5-containing GABA(A) receptors. In addition, these compounds showed no functional activity at α1-containing GABA(A) receptors. Such dual functional modulators of GABA(A) receptors might be useful for treating comorbidity of anxiety and cognitive impairments in neurological and psychiatric illnesses.