Comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in hypertensive and normotensive diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. Melbourne Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with calcium antagonism in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. DESIGN--Randomised study of diabetic patients with microalbuminuria treated with perindopril or nifedipine for 12 months and monitored for one or three months after stopping treatment depending on whether they were hypertensive or normotensive. Patients were randomised separately according to whether they were hypertensive or normotensive. SETTING--Diabetic clinics in three university teaching hospitals. PATIENTS--50 diabetic patients with persistent microalbuminuria. In all, 43 completed the study: 30 were normotensive and 13 hypertensive; 19 had type I diabetes and 24 had type II diabetes. INTERVENTIONS--For 12 months 20 patients were given perindopril 2-8 mg daily and 23 were given nifedipine 20-80 mg daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Albumin excretion rate, blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS--Both perindopril and nifedipine significantly reduced mean blood pressure. During treatment there was no significant difference between those treated with perindopril and those treated with nifedipine with respect to albuminuria or mean blood pressure. Stopping treatment with both drugs was associated with a sustained increase in albuminuria and mean blood pressure. There was a significant correlation between mean blood pressure and albuminuria and also between the reduction in mean blood pressure and the decrease in albuminuria during treatment with both drugs. In hypertensive patients both drugs caused significant decreases in mean blood pressure and albuminuria. In normotensive patients there was no significant reduction in albuminuria with either regimen. CONCLUSIONS--In diabetic patients with microalbuminuria blood pressure seems to be an important determinant of urinary albumin excretion. Perindopril and nifedipine have similar effects on urinary albumin excretion, both preventing increases in albuminuria in normotensive patients and decreasing albuminuria in hypertensive patients.     

Nifedipine and atenolol singly and combined for treatment of essential hypertension: comparative multicentre study in general practice in the United Kingdom

A randomised double blind parallel group study was performed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of slow release nifedipine (maximum dose 40 mg twice a day) with those of atenolol (maximum dose 100 mg once a day) as single agents for the treatment of essential hypertension. Of 410 patients recruited almost exclusively from general practices in 22 centres in the United Kingdom 210 received nifedipine and 200 atenolol. Both drugs significantly reduced blood pressure, and control—a reduction of the diastolic pressure to less than 95 mm Hg—was obtained in about 65% of patients. Those who received nifedipine had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressure than those who received atenolol. One hundred and forty nine patients who failed to respond adequately to either atenolol or nifedipine in low doses were given both drugs once daily for eight weeks in a fixed combination capsule that contained atenolol 50 mg and nifedipine 20 mg. All patients showed further reductions in blood pressure, although those who were taking β atenolol before the combination capsule had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressures. Twenty six patients (12%) were withdrawn because of adverse effects while taking nifedipine compared with 19 (10%) taking atenolol. Flushing and oedema were more common after the calcium antagonist, whereas diarrhoea and dyspepsia were more common after atenolol. The frequencies of headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and dyspnoea were equally distributed between the two groups. When the fixed combination capsule was taken side effects such as flushing and oedema continued.Nifedipine was more effective than atenolol in lowering systolic blood pressure, although neither drug used alone controlled the pressure of more than two thirds of the patients studied. When used in a fixed combination slightly better control of blood pressure was achieved with a lower dose of each drug.     

Chronopharmacology of Captopril plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertension: Morning Versus Evening Dosing

Blood pressure follows a strong circadian rhythm in normotensive people and in patients with primary hypertension. This may have several implications for antihypertensive therapy, including the time of dosing. For this reason we studied the influence of different dosing times on the antihypertensive effect over 24 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We studied 13 male patients with moderate hypertension with controlled blood pressure over 12 months under a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. The dosage of the combination therapy was then halved and given as one evening and then as one morning dose, each for 3 weeks. The combination therapy given twice daily showed a good 24-h antihypertensive effect after 12 months of treatment. During the following 6 weeks the mean 24-h blood pressure did not increase under half dosage, irrespective of whether under evening or morning dosing. However, mean daytime values (systolic and diastolic) of ABPM were significantly higher with evening dosing when compared both with full dosage and with half dosage given in the morning. The mean arterial blood pressure over 24 h showed the same differences as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, whereas heart rate was not significantly different between the three therapeutic regimens. ABPM seems to be an ideal method for chronopharmacological investigations under everyday conditions. Our study demonstrated significant differences in daytime blood pressure but not in 24-h blood pressure between morning and evening dosing of a fixed antihypertensive combination therapy.     

Chronopharmacology of Captopril plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertension: Morning Versus Evening Dosing

Blood pressure follows a strong circadian rhythm in normotensive people and in patients with primary hypertension. This may have several implications for antihypertensive therapy, including the time of dosing. For this reason we studied the influence of different dosing times on the antihypertensive effect over 24 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We studied 13 male patients with moderate hypertension with controlled blood pressure over 12 months under a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. The dosage of the combination therapy was then halved and given as one evening and then as one morning dose, each for 3 weeks. The combination therapy given twice daily showed a good 24-h antihypertensive effect after 12 months of treatment. During the following 6 weeks the mean 24-h blood pressure did not increase under half dosage, irrespective of whether under evening or morning dosing. However, mean daytime values (systolic and diastolic) of ABPM were significantly higher with evening dosing when compared both with full dosage and with half dosage given in the morning. The mean arterial blood pressure over 24 h showed the same differences as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, whereas heart rate was not significantly different between the three therapeutic regimens. ABPM seems to be an ideal method for chronopharmacological investigations under everyday conditions. Our study demonstrated significant differences in daytime blood pressure but not in 24-h blood pressure between morning and evening dosing of a fixed antihypertensive combination therapy.     

Chronopharmacokinetics and Cardiovascular Effects of Nifedipine

Orcadian phase dependency in pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects on blood pressure and heart rate of different galenic formulations of nifedipine (immediate-release, sustained-release, and i.v. solution) were studied in healthy subjects or in hypertensive patients. Pharmacokinetics of immediate-release but not sustained-release and i.v. nifedipine were dependent on time of day: immediate-release nifedipine had higher C_max (peak concentration) and shorter t_max (time-to-peak concentration) after morning than evening application, and bioavailibility in the evening was reduced by about 40%. Orcadian rhythm in estimated hepatic blood flow as determined by indocyanine green kinetics may contribute to these chronokinetics. A circadian time dependency was also found in nifedipine-induced effects on blood pressure and heart rate as monitored by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements. In conclusion, the dose response relationship of oral nifedipine is influenced by the circadian organization of the cardiovascular system as well as by the galenic drug formulation.     

苯磺酸氨氯地平和厄贝沙坦对老年高血压病患者血压及 血压变异性的影响

目的:比较苯磺酸氨氯地平和厄贝沙坦对老年高血压病患者血压及24小时动态血压变异性的影响。方法:研究140例年龄在60～75岁之间的患者随机分为A、B两组,每组各70例,A组予以服用苯磺酸氨氯地平片(5mg/d)、B组予以厄贝沙坦片(150mg/d),对两组病人进行服药前及服药4周后24小时动态血压检查,比较两种药物对血压及24小时动态血压变异性的影响。结果:①两种降压药物均能有效降低血压(P<0.05)。②在控制24小时血压变异性方面,苯磺酸氨氯地平优于厄贝沙坦(P<0.05)。结论:与厄贝沙坦相比,苯磺酸氨氯地平能更理想的控制血压变异性。     

Chronopharmacokinetics and Cardiovascular Effects of Nifedipine

Orcadian phase dependency in pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects on blood pressure and heart rate of different galenic formulations of nifedipine (immediate-release, sustained-release, and i.v. solution) were studied in healthy subjects or in hypertensive patients. Pharmacokinetics of immediate-release but not sustained-release and i.v. nifedipine were dependent on time of day: immediate-release nifedipine had higher C_max (peak concentration) and shorter t_max (time-to-peak concentration) after morning than evening application, and bioavailibility in the evening was reduced by about 40%. Orcadian rhythm in estimated hepatic blood flow as determined by indocyanine green kinetics may contribute to these chronokinetics. A circadian time dependency was also found in nifedipine-induced effects on blood pressure and heart rate as monitored by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements. In conclusion, the dose response relationship of oral nifedipine is influenced by the circadian organization of the cardiovascular system as well as by the galenic drug formulation.     

Circadian rhythm of blood pressure in congestive heart failure and effects of ACE inhibitors.

In 33 patients with heart failure (NYHA II-III), the 24-h blood pressure rhythm was examined before and after the titration period of two ACE inhibitors. Blood pressure was measured by the oscillometric method using the blood pressure monitor 90202 from SpaceLabs, Inc. The measurements were taken from 06:00 to 22:00 h every 20 min and from 22:00 to 06:00 h every hour. Patients were randomized to therapy with either captopril (group 1, n = 17) or enalapril (group 2, n = 16). The average daily dosage of captopril was 41 +/- 3 mg given in three divided doses (08:00, 12:00, and 17:00 h). The mean dose of enalapril was 8 +/- 1 mg once daily (08:00 h). Serum electrolytes, serum creatinine, and plasma renin activity were measured before and during therapy with both ACE inhibitors. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure measurements were taken before and on the fifth day of treatment with ACE inhibitors. Both groups were not different with respect to the degree of heart failure, the concomitant medication, and the 24-h profiles of blood pressure and heart rate before initiation of ACE inhibition. The 24-h blood pressure values on day 5 were consistently below the pretreatment values (p less than 0.005) in both groups. Both groups did not differ significantly during ACE inhibition in their 24-h blood pressure and heart rate profiles. In both groups, the mesor of the systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly by the same degree (by 4.7/5.1 mmg Hg in group 1 and 6.4/4.1 mm Hg in group 2). The systolic/diastolic blood pressure amplitude decreased slightly in both groups. Before treatment, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine were within the normal range. The increase in potassium (0.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) reached statistical significance (p less than 0.01) only in the captopril group, whereas it was not significant in the enalapril group (0.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/L). Serum creatinine was not significantly altered by both ACE inhibitors. No relationship could be found between the changes in serum potassium or creatinine and the mean of the 24-h blood pressure values during ACE inhibition. Captopril and enalapril showed comparable blood pressure profiles and similar effects on renal function at the end of the titration on day 5. It can therefore be concluded that the effects on blood pressure rhythm and renal function are similar with a single daily dose of enalapril compared to captopril given three times daily.     

硝苯地平与硫酸镁治疗妊娠高血压综合征的临床疗效及对患者血清肌 酐、HSP70 及尿微量白蛋白水平的影响

目的:探讨硝苯地平联合硫酸镁对妊娠高血压综合征患者血清肌酐、HSP70及尿微量白蛋白水平的影响。方法:选取近5年在我院接受治疗的妊娠高血压综合征患者60例,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组30例。对照组患者采用硫酸镁治疗,实验组患者采取硝苯地平联合硫酸镁治疗。观察并比较治疗前后两组患者血清肌酐(Scr)、血尿素氮(BUN)、血尿酸(UA)热休克蛋白70(HSP70)及24 h尿微量白蛋白水平以及收缩压及舒张压的变化。结果:与治疗前相比,两组患者Scr、BUN、UA、HSP70及24 h尿微量白蛋白水平和收缩压及舒张压均显著降低(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者上述指标均明显降低(P0.05)。结论:硝苯地平联合硫酸镁能够降低妊娠高血压综合征患者血压,保护患者肾功能。     

Nifedipine in hypertensive emergencies.

The effects and safety of using oral nifedipine 10-20 mg as acute antihypertensive treatment were studied in a single-blind placebo-controlled study of 25 consecutive patients with very high blood pressure requiring emergency reduction. In addition the effect of this treatment on cerebral blood flow was investigated using xenon-133 in 10 patients randomly allocated to receive oral nifedipine or intravenous clonidine. Whereas placebo did not alter the blood pressure, oral nifedipine significantly reduced the systolic and diastolic blood pressures in all 25 patients (from 221 +/- 22/126 +/- 14 mm Hg to 152 +/- 20/89 +/- 12 mm Hg after 30 minutes, p less than 0.001). Heart rate increased from 74 +/- 11 to 84 +/- 11 beats/minute (p less than 0.01); this effect was inversely related to age (r = -0.65, p less than 0.01). The falls in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were closely related to the blood pressures before treatment ) r = 0.67, p less than 0.001 for systolic, and r = -0.58, p less than 0.01 for diastolic values). No serious unwanted effects were observed. Measurement of cerebral blood flow after nifedipine showed an increase in flow in four out of five patients. Clonidine, by contrast, reduced cerebral blood flow in all patients by up to 28%. Nifedipine is a simple, effective, and safe alternative drug for managing hypertensive emergencies, especially when continuous monitoring of the patient cannot be guaranteed.     

Circadian Rhythm of Blood Pressure in Congestive Heart Failure and Effects of ACE Inhibitors

In 33 patients with heart failure (NYHA 11-III), the 24-h blood pressure rhythm was examined before and after the titration period of two ACE inhibitors. Blood pressure was measured by the oscillometric method using the blood pressure monitor 90202 from SpaceLabs, Inc. The measurements were taken from 06:OO to 22:OO h every 20 min and from 22:00 to 06:00 h every hour. Patients were randomized to therapy with either captopril (group 1, n = 17) or enalapril (group 2, n = 16). The average daily dosage of captopril was 41 ± 3 mg given in three divided doses (08:00, 12:00, and 17:00 h). The mean dose of enalapril was 8 ± 1 mg once daily (08:00 h). Serum electrolytes, serum creatinine, and plasma renin activity were measured before and during therapy with both ACE inhibitors. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure measurements were taken before and on the fifth day of treatment with ACE inhibitors. Both groups were not different with respect to the degree of heart failure, the concomitant medication, and the 24-h profiles of blood pressure and heart rate before initiation of ACE inhibition. The 24-h blood pressure values on day 5 were consistently below the pretreatment values (p < 0.005) in both groups. Both groups did not differ significantly during ACE inhibition in their 24-h blood pressure and heart rate profiles. In both groups, the mesor of the systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly by the same degree (by 4.7/5.1 mmg Hg in group 1 and 6.4/4.1 mm Hg in group 2). The systolic/diastolic blood pressure amplitude decreased slightly in both groups. Before treatment, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine were within the normal range. The increase in potassium (0.5 ± 0.1 mmol/L) reached statistical significance (p < 0.01) only in the captopril group, whereas it was not significant in the enalapril group (0.1 ± 0.1 mmol/L). Serum creatinine was not significantly altered by both ACE inhibitors. No relationship could be found between the changes in serum potassium or creatinine and the mean of the 24-h blood pressure values during ACE inhibition. Captopril and enalapril showed comparable blood pressure profiles and similar effects on renal function at the end of the titration on day 5. It can therefore be concluded that the effects on blood pressure rhythm and renal function are similar with a single daily dose of enalapril compared to captopril given three times daily.     

Effect of using nifedipine by patients with chronic congestive heart failure treated with digoxin and furosemide

Nifedipine was administrated to 25 patients with chronic congestive heart failure treated with digoxin and furosemide++, nifedipine (NF) in a daily dose of 30-80 mg for 14 days. Before and after the treatment with nifedipine chest X-ray, blood biochemical investigations, echocardiographic evaluation of the left ventricular function and submaximal exercise test were performed. Nifedipine induced significant decreases in the left ventricular systolic dimension, heart volume, blood serum potassium and uric acid concentrations and hematocrit . Resting and exertional heart rate, blood pressure, exercise power and duration, watt-pulse, myocardial oxygen demand index, ejection fraction, cardiac output, body weight, 24-hour urinary output, blood serum concentrations of urea, creatinine, sodium and chloride changed insignificantly following nifedipine administration. The obtained results suggest that long-term nifedipine treatment of patients who were already given digoxin and furosemide neither improve nor worsen their clinical status.     

Effect of eplerenone on parathyroid hormone levels in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests the bidirectional interplay between parathyroid hormone and aldosterone as an important mechanism behind the increased risk of cardiovascular damage and bone disease observed in primary hyperparathyroidism. Our primary object is to assess the efficacy of the mineralocorticoid receptor-blocker eplerenone to reduce parathyroid hormone secretion in patients with parathyroid hormone excess. Methods/design Overall, 110 adult male and female patients with primary hyperparathyroidism will be randomly assigned to eplerenone (25 mg once daily for 4 weeks and 4 weeks with 50 mg once daily after dose titration] or placebo, over eight weeks. Each participant will undergo detailed clinical assessment, including anthropometric evaluation, 24-h ambulatory arterial blood pressure monitoring, echocardiography, kidney function and detailed laboratory determination of biomarkers of bone metabolism and cardiovascular disease. The study comprises the following exploratory endpoints: mean change from baseline to week eight in (1) parathyroid hormone(1--84) as the primary endpoint and (2) 24-hour systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure levels, NT-pro-BNP, biomarkers of bone metabolism, 24 hours urinary protein/albumin excretion and echocardiographic parameters reflecting systolic and diastolic function as well as cardiac dimensions, as secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION: In view of the reciprocal interaction between aldosterone and parathyroid hormone and the potentially ensuing target organ damage, the EPATH trial is designed to determine whether eplerenone, compared to placebo, will effectively impact on parathyroid hormone secretion and improve cardiovascular and bone health in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Trial registration ISRCTN33941607.     

贝那普利联合氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压的临床研究

目的：探讨贝那普利联合氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压的降压效果。方法：将152例原发性高血压患者随机分为两组,治疗组（n=76）采用贝那普利＋氨氯地平进行治疗,对照组（n=76）采用贝那普利进行治疗,疗程8周,在治疗前、治疗后4周和8周进行24h动态血压监测（ABPM）,分别记录24h平均血压、白天及夜间平均血压、心率等指标,分析并比较临床疗效。结果：两组患者治疗前后24h平均血压、白天及夜间平均血压明显低于治疗前,差异具有显著性意义（P〈0．05）;治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为97．4％和80-3％,差异均具有显著性意义（P〈0．01）。结论：应用贝那普利＋氨氯地平对原发性高血压进行治疗,其降压效果明显,有效控制血压降低,不良反应少,是理想的联合降压方法,值得临床推荐。     

Ambulatory blood pressure during once-daily randomised double-blind administration of atenolol,metoprolol, pindolol,and slow-release propranolol

Intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure was measured over 24 hours, in 34 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, both before and after double-blind randomisation to treatment with atenolol (n=9), metoprolol (n=9), pindolol (n=9), or propranolol in its slow-release form (n=7). The dosage of each drug was adjusted at monthly clinic visits until satisfactory control of blood pressure was achieved (140/90 mm Hg or less by cuff) or the maximum dose in the study protocol was reached. A second intra-arterial recording was made after these drugs had been taken once daily at 0800 for three to eight months (mean 5·0±SD 1·4) and was started four hours after the last dose.At the end of the 24-hour recordings blood pressure was significantly lower with all four drugs. The extent to which the drugs reduced blood pressure, however, differed over the 24 hours. Atenolol lowered mean arterial pressure significantly throughout all 24 recorded hours, metoprolol for 12 hours, pindolol for 15 hours, and slow-release propranolol for 22 hours. Neither metoprolol nor pindolol lowered blood pressure during sleep. A significant reduction in heart rate was observed over 20 hours with atenolol, 20 hours with metoprolol, 10 hours with pindolol, and 24 hours with slow-release propranolol. Atenolol, metoprolol, and slow-release propranolol continued to slow the heart rate 24 hours after the last tablet was taken; this effect on heart rate, however, was not sustained throughout the second morning in those patients taking atenolol. Pindolol, the only drug studied that has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, increased heart rate and did not lower blood pressure during sleep.Atenolol and slow-release propranolol are effective as antihypertensive agents over 24 hours when taken once daily, whereas metoprolol and pindolol may need to be taken more frequently. At times of low sympathetic tone, however, such as during sleep, beta-blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity may raise heart rate and attenuate the fall in blood pressure with treatment.     

Hyperbaric indices (HBI) assess the extent and timing of deviant blood pressure in patients under treatment

Fourteen patients provided data from ambulatory monitoring at 7.5-min intervals for 24h. Rhythm characteristics and measures of blood pressure excess (hyperbaric indices along the 24-h scale) are presented in mmHg/h. A 10-year projection of blood pressure excess exceeded the 1,000,000 mmHg/h limit for systolic blood pressure in 4 cases and for diastolic blood pressure in 1 case. In such cases, additional treatment is urgently indicated, whether or not the mean blood pressure is near or even below the limits indicated by current guidelines.     

硫酸镁联合硝苯地平治疗中重度妊娠高血压综合征患者的疗效观察

目的:探讨硫酸镁联合硝苯地平治疗中重度妊娠期高血压综合征的临床疗效。方法:选取2013年5月-2014年10月我院收治的中重度妊娠期高血压综合征患者70例,随机将患者分为研究组和对照组,每组35例。对照组患者应用硫酸镁治疗,研究组患者给予硫酸镁联合硝苯地平治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效、血压变化、血液粘度、24 h尿蛋白含量以及血细胞压积情况。结果:研究组治疗总有效率显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者治疗后的血压水平显著低于治疗前,且研究组显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者治疗后的血液粘度、24 h尿蛋白含量及血细胞压积显著优于治疗前,且研究组优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:硫酸镁联合硝苯地平治疗中重度妊娠期高血压具有较好的临床疗效,能够显著改善患者的临床症状。     

Understanding Worry About Risks Associated With Thyroid Hormone Therapy: A National Survey of Endocrinologists,Family Physicians,and Geriatricians

ObjectiveThyroid hormone use is widespread, and prior studies have shown that over- and undertreatment with thyroid hormone are common. Our objective was to understand physician worry regarding risks associated with thyroid hormone therapy, specifically overtreatment or undertreatment.MethodsA nationwide survey was administered to physician members of the Endocrine Society, the American Academy of Family Practice, and the American Geriatrics Society. Participants were asked how often they were worried about various risks that may be associated with thyroid hormone over- or undertreatment, that is, cardiovascular complications, bone complications, and poor quality of life due to overtreatment or undertreatment with thyroid hormone. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to determine physician characteristics associated with each worry.ResultsThe response rate was 63% (359 of 566); of those who responded, 128 (36%) were primary care physicians, 114 (32%) were endocrinologists, and 113 (32%) were geriatricians. Overall, 74 (21%) physicians reported that they frequently or always worried about cardiovascular complications, 74 (21%) about bone complications, 111 (31%) about the poor quality of life due to symptoms from undertreatment with thyroid hormone, and 87 (24%) about the poor quality of life due to symptoms from overtreatment with thyroid hormone. Endocrinologists were more likely to frequently or always worry about the patients' poor quality of life due to symptoms from overtreatment (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.93) compared with primary care physicians.ConclusionUp to one third of the physicians frequently or always worried about risks resulting from the thyroid hormone overtreatment or undertreatment. More research is needed across specialties to understand physician perceptions of how thyroid hormone therapy impacts the patients' quality of life.     

Long-acting nifedipine versus metoprolol as monotherapy for essential hypertension. A randomized,controlled crossover study.

We assessed the efficacy of long-acting nifedipine as monotherapy in 52 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension in a randomized, controlled crossover study. Good blood pressure control was achieved in 34 of 40 patients (85%) receiving nifedipine (mean daily dose, 52 mg in 2 divided doses) compared with 23 of 40 patients (58%) receiving metoprolol (mean daily dose, 155 mg in 2 divided doses). After treatment for 4 weeks, the mean blood pressures with nifedipine (149.7 +/- 16.6/88.7 +/- 11.1 mm of mercury) and metoprolol administration (163.9 +/- 23.3/94.2 +/- 10.2 mm of mercury) were significantly lower than with placebo (176.7 +/- 17.3/100.9 +/- 7.1 mm of mercury) (P less than .05). The mean systolic pressure during nifedipine treatment was 14.2 mm of mercury lower (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9 to 24.5 mm of mercury) and mean diastolic pressure 5.5 mm of mercury (95% CI, 0.3 to 10.7 mm of mercury) lower than with metoprolol therapy. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated, and intolerance requiring withdrawal was encountered in 3 of 45 (7%) patients receiving nifedipine, compared with 1 of 45 (2%) of those taking metoprolol and placebo, respectively. Adverse effects of nifedipine, most of which were transient, included palpitations, headache, facial flushing, and ankle edema. Long-acting nifedipine is a promising agent when given alone for mild to moderate hypertension and can be safely administered in clinical practice.     

Lack of nocturnal blood pressure fall in elderly bedridden hypertensive patients with cerebrovascular disease

To prevent recurrence of cerebrovascular disease (CVD), adequate control of blood pressure (BP) is extremely important for the treatment of hypertensive CVD patients. As absence of the nocturnal fall of BP by the expected 10-20% from daytime levels is reported to exaggerate target organ injury, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was conducted, especially to obtain data during nighttime sleep. Forty-eight elderly bedridden chronic phase CVD hypertensive patients (assessed 1-3 mo after CVD accident) participated. As a group, nocturnal BP was higher than diurnal BP, whereas nocturnal pulse rate was lower than diurnal pulse rate. The nocturnal BP fall was blunted in most (～90%) of the patients. These results suggest that to perform a rational drug treatment, it is essential to do 24-h ABPM before initiation of antihypertensive therapy in elderly bedridden hypertensive CVD patients.