uPA-silica-Particles (SP-uPA): a novel analytical system to investigate uPA-uPAR interaction and to test synthetic uPAR antagonists as potential cancer therapeutics

The urokinase-type plasminogen activation system, including the serine protease uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) and its cell surface receptor (uPAR, CD87), are important key molecules in tumor invasion and metastasis. Besides its proteolytic function, binding of uPA to uPAR on tumor cells exerts various cell responses such as migration, adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Hence, the uPA/uPAR system is a potential target for tumor therapy. We have designed a new generation of uPA-derived synthetic cyclic peptides suited to interfere with the binding of uPA to uPAR and present a new technology involving micro silica particles coated with uPA (SP-uPA) and reacting with recombinant soluble uPAR (suPAR), to rapidly assess the antagonistic potential of uPA-peptides by flow cytofluorometry (FACS). For this, we used silica particles of 10 microm in diameter to which HMW-uPA is coupled using the EDC/NHS method. Soluble, recombinant suPAR was added and the interaction of SP-uPA with suPAR verified by reaction with monoclonal antibody HD13.1 directed to uPAR, followed by a cyan dye (cy5)-labeled antibody directed against mouse IgG. Thereby it was possible to test naturally occurring ligands of uPAR (HMW-uPA, ATF) as well as highly effective, synthetic cyclic uPA-derived peptides (cyclo21,29[D-Cys21Cys29]-UPA21-30, cyclo21,29[D-Cys21Nle28Cys29]-uPA21-30, cyclo21,29[D-Cys(21)2-Nal24Cys29]-uPA21-30, and cyclo21,29[D-Cys21Orn23Thi24Thi25Cys29]-uPA21-30. The results obtained with the noncellular SP-uPA/uPAR system are highly comparable to those obtained with a cellular system involving FITC-uPA and the promyeloid cell line U937 as the source of uPAR.     

Cyclo19,31[D-Cys19]-uPA19-31 is a potent competitive antagonist of the interaction of urokinase-type plasminogen activator with its receptor (CD87)

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) represents a central molecule in pericellular proteolysis and is implicated in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes such as tissue remodelling, wound healing, tumor invasion, and metastasis. uPA binds with high affinity to a specific cell surface receptor, uPAR (CD87), via a well defined sequence within the N-terminal region of uPA (uPA19-31). This interaction directs the proteolytic activity of uPA to the cell surface which represents an important step in tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Due to its fundamental role in these processes, the uPA/uPAR-system has emerged as a novel target for tumor therapy. Previously, we have identified a synthetic, cyclic, uPA-derived peptide, cyclo19,31uPA19-31, as a lead structure for the development of low molecular weight uPA-analogues, capable of blocking uPA/uPAR-interaction [Burgle et al., Biol. Chem. 378 (1997), 231-237]. We now searched for peptide variants of cyclo19,31uPA19-31 with elevated affinities for uPAR binding. Among other tasks, we performed a systematic D-amino acid scan of uPA19-31, in which each of the 13 L-amino acids was individually substituted by the corresponding D-amino acid. This led to the identification of cyclo19,31[D-Cys19]-uPA19-31 as a potent inhibitor of uPA/uPAR-interaction, displaying only a 20 to 40-fold lower binding capacity as compared to the naturally occurring uPAR-ligands uPA and its amino-terminal fragment. Cyclo19,31[D-Cys19]-uPA19-31 not only blocks binding of uPA to uPAR but is also capable of efficiently displacing uPAR-bound uPA from the cell surface and to inhibit uPA-mediated, tumor cell-associated plasminogen activation and fibrin degradation. Thus, cyclo19,31[D-Cys19]-uPA19-31 represents a promising therapeutic agent to significantly affect the tumor-associated uPA/uPAR-system.     

High level synthesis of recombinant soluble urokinase receptor (CD87) by ovarian cancer cells reduces intraperitoneal tumor growth and spread in nude mice

Focussing of the serine protease urokinase (uPA) to the tumor cell surface via interaction with its receptor (uPAR) is an important step in tumor invasion and metastasis. The human ovarian cancer cell line OV-MZ-6#8 was stably transfected with expression plasmids either encoding cell-associated uPAR (GPI-uPAR) or a soluble form of uPAR (suPAR) lacking its glycan lipid anchor. In vitro, high level synthesis of functionally active recombinant suPAR inhibited cell proliferation and led to reduced cell-associated fibrin matrix degradation, whereas fibrinolytic activity was increased in OV-MZ-6#8 cells overexpressing GPI-uPAR. Both OV-MZ-6#8-derived clones were inoculated into the peritoneum of nude mice and tested for tumor growth and spread. High level synthesis of recombinant suPAR (without altering the physiological expression levels of GPI-uPAR and uPA in these cells) resulted in a significant reduction of tumor burden (up to 86%) in the xenogeneic mouse model. In contrast, overexpression of GPI-uPAR in tumor cells did not affect tumor growth. Our results demonstrate that high levels of suPAR in the ovarian cancer cell vicinity can act as a potent scavenger for uPA, thereby significantly reducing tumor cell growth and cancer progression in vivo.     

RNA interference-directed knockdown of urokinase plasminogen activator and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor inhibits prostate cancer cell invasion, survival, and tumorigenicity in vivo

The invasive ability of tumor cells plays a key role in prostate cancer metastasis and is a major cause of treatment failure. Urokinase plasminogen activator-(uPA) and its receptor (uPAR)-mediated signaling have been implicated in tumor cell invasion, survival, and metastasis in a variety of cancers. This study was undertaken to investigate the biological roles of uPA and uPAR in prostate cancer cell invasion and survival, and the potential of uPA and uPAR as targets for prostate cancer therapy. uPA and uPAR expression correlates with the metastatic potential of prostate cancer cells. Thus, therapies designed to inhibit uPA and uPAR expression would be beneficial. LNCaP, DU145, and PC3 are prostate cancer cell lines with low, moderate, and high metastatic potential, respectively, as demonstrated by their capacity to invade the extracellular matrix. In this study we utilized small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), also referred to as small interfering RNAs, to target human uPA and uPAR. These small interfering RNA constructs significantly inhibited uPA and uPAR expression at both the mRNA and protein levels in the highly metastatic prostate cancer cell line PC3. Our data demonstrated that uPA-uPAR knockdown in PC3 cells resulted in a dramatic reduction of tumor cell invasion as indicated by a Matrigel invasion assay. Furthermore, simultaneous silencing of the genes for uPA and uPAR using a single plasmid construct expressing shRNAs for both uPA and uPAR significantly reduced cell viability and ultimately resulted in the induction of apoptotic cell death. RNA interference for uPA and uPAR also abrogated uPA-uPAR signaling to downstream target molecules such as ERK1/2 and Stat 3. In addition, our results demonstrated that intratumoral injection with the plasmid construct expressing shRNAs for uPA and uPAR almost completely inhibited established tumor growth and survival in an orthotopic mouse prostate cancer model. These findings uncovered evidence of a complex signaling network operating downstream of uPA-uPAR that actively advances tumor cell invasion, proliferation, and survival of prostate cancer cells. Thus, RNA interference-directed targeting of uPA and uPAR is a convenient and novel tool for studying the biological role of the uPA-uPAR system and raises the potential of its application for prostate cancer therapy.     

The urokinase/urokinase receptor system mediates the IgG immune complex-induced inflammation in lung

Immune complex (IC) deposition induces an acute inflammatory response with tissue injury. IC-induced inflammation is mediated by inflammatory cell infiltration, a process highly regulated by the cell surface-specific receptor (uPAR), a binding partner for the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). We assessed the role of the uPA/uPAR system in IC-induced inflammation using the pulmonary reverse passive Arthus reaction in mice lacking uPA and uPAR compared with their corresponding wild-type controls. Both uPA-deficient C57BL/6J (uPA(-/-)) and uPAR-deficient mice on a mixed C57BL/6J (75%) x 129 (25%) background (uPAR(-/-)) demonstrated a marked reduction of the inflammatory response due to decreased production of proinflammatory mediators TNF-alpha and Glu-Leu-Arg (ELR)-CXC chemokine MIP-2. In uPAR(-/-) animals, the reduction of inflammatory response was more pronounced because of decreased migratory capacity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. We show that the uPA/uPAR system is activated in lung of wild-type mice, particularly in resident alveolar macrophages (AM), early in IC-induced alveolitis. This activation is necessary for an adequate C5a anaphylatoxin receptor signaling on AM that, in turn, modulates the functional balance of the activating/inhibitory IgG FcgammaRs responsible for proinflammatory mediator release. These data provide the first evidence that the uPA/uPAR plays an important immunoregulatory role in the initiation of the reverse passive Arthus reaction in the lung by setting the threshold for C5a anaphylatoxin receptor/FcgammaR activation on AM. The findings indicate an important link between the uPA/uPAR system and the two main components involved in the IC inflammation, namely, complement and FcgammaRs.     

Internalization of the urokinase-plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 complex is mediated by the urokinase receptor.

The role of the urokinase receptor (uPAR) in the internalization of the urokinase-plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (uPA.PAI-1) complex has been investigated. First, exploiting the species specificity of uPA binding, we show that mouse LB6 cells (that express a mouse uPAR) were unable to bind or degrade the human uPA.PAI-1 complex. On the other hand, LB6 clone 19 cells, which express a transfected human uPAR, degraded uPA.PAI-1 complexes with kinetics identical to the human monocytic U937 cells. We also show by immunofluorescence experiments with anti-uPA antibodies that in LB6 clone 19 cells, the uPA.PAI-1 complex is indeed internalized. While at 4 degrees C uPA fluorescence was visible at the cell surface, shift of the temperature to 37 degrees C caused a displacement of the immunoreactivity to the cytoplasmic compartment, with a pattern indicating lysosomal localization. If uPA.PAI-1 internalization/degradation is mediated by uPAR, inhibition of uPA.PAI-1 binding to uPAR should block degradation. Three different treatments, competition with the agonist amino-terminal fragment of uPA, treatment with a monoclonal antibody directed toward the binding domain of uPAR or release of uPAR from the cell surface with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C completely prevented uPA.PAI-1 degradation. The possibility that a serpin-enzyme complex receptor might be primarily or secondarily involved in the internalization process was excluded since a serpin-enzyme complex peptide failed to inhibit uPA.PAI-1 binding and degradation. Similarly, complexes of PAI-1 with low molecular mass uPA (33 kDa uPA), which lacks the uPAR binding domain, were neither bound nor degraded. Finally we also show that treatment of cells with uPA.PAI-1 complex caused a specific but partial down-regulation of uPAR. A similar result was obtained when PAI-1 was allowed to complex to uPA that had been previously bound to the receptor. The possibility therefore exists that the entire complex uPA.PAI-1-uPAR is internalized. All these data allow us to conclude that internalization of the uPA.PAI-1 complex is mediated by uPAR.     

Sequences within domain II of the urokinase receptor critical for differential ligand recognition

The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) plays important roles in a number of physiological and pathological processes by virtue of its interactions with urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), vitronectin (Vn), and several other proteins. The uPA binding site spans all three domains (D1 to D3) of uPAR. However, the nature of the Vn binding site within uPAR is still not clear. In this study, we conducted homolog-scanning mutagenesis on uPAR by switching 14 individual segments of 4-8 residues to their counterpart sequences of a uPAR homolog CD59. All 14 mutants were well expressed, reacted with a panel of monoclonal antibodies, and exhibited correct molecular weights. Of these 14 mutants, six mutants were defective in both uPA and Vn binding. Most importantly, we found two unique mutants uPAR(Asn172-Lys175) and uPAR(Glu183-Asn186) within the D2 domain, which displayed differential ligand binding activity: both had high affinity uPA binding, but completely lost Vn binding, indicating that these two sequences constitute a novel Vn binding site. Indeed, two peptides, P1 (153CPGSNGFHNNDTFHFLKC) and P2 (171CNTTKCNEGPILELENLPQ), derived from the sequences of the identified uPA and Vn binding pockets within D2, respectively, behaved like bona fide ligand binding sites: peptide P1 bound uPA but not Vn, whereas peptide P2 bound Vn and inhibited uPAR-mediated cell adhesion, but did not interact with uPA. Altogether, our data demonstrated that uPAR D2 contains two distinct ligand binding sites for uPA and Vn. Such information will help us better understand the complex roles of uPAR in cell adhesion, migration, and tumor metastasis.     

Recycling of the urokinase receptor upon internalization of the uPA:serpin complexes.

The GPI-anchored urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) does not internalize free urokinase (uPA) but readily internalizes and degrades uPA:serpin complexes in a process that requires the alpha2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (alpha2MR-LRP). This process is accompanied by the internalization of uPAR which renders it resistant to phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC). In this paper we show that during internalization of uPA:serpins at 37 degrees C, analysed by FACScan, immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy, an initial decrease of cell surface uPAR was observed, followed by its reappearance at later times. This effect was not due to redistribution of previously intracellular receptors, nor to the surface expression of newly synthesized uPAR. Recycling was directly demonstrated in cell surface-biotinylated, uPA:PAI-1-exposed cells in which biotinylated uPAR was first internalized and subsequently recycled back to the surface upon incubation at 37 degrees C. In fact, uPAR was resistant to PI-PLC after the 4 degrees C binding of uPA:PAI-1 to biotinylated cells, but upon incubation at 37 degrees C PI-PLC-sensitive biotinylated uPAR reappeared at the cell surface. Binding of uPA:PAI-1 by uPAR, while essential to initiate the whole process, was, however, dispensable at later stages as both internalization and recycling of uPAR could be observed also after dissociation of the bound ligand from the cell surface.     

上皮性卵巢癌组织中uPA及uPAR的表达(英文)

目的:研究uPA和uPAR在卵巢癌中的表达,分析其与卵巢癌的发展和预后的关系。方法:采用免疫组织化学法检测60例上皮性卵巢癌、20例交界性卵巢肿瘤及20例良性卵巢肿瘤组织中uPA、uPAR及表达,并结合临床病理因素进行分析。结果:(1)uPA、uPAR、在上皮性卵巢癌中的表达率(75%,66.7%)明显高于交界性卵巢肿瘤(40%,30%)及良性卵巢肿瘤组织(30%,25%),差异均有统计学意义(uPAx2=22.078,P0.001;uPARx2=19.510,P0.05),而交界性卵巢肿瘤与良性卵巢肿瘤组织间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。(2)uPA、uPAR在恶性卵巢肿瘤中阳性表达率与手术病理分期、组织分级和有无淋巴结转移有关;晚期癌组阳性表达率高于早期癌组(uPAx2=14.400,P0.05;uPARx2=9.6,P=0.002);低分化癌组的阳性表达率高于中高分化癌(uPAx2=15.002,P0.05;uPARx2=36.906,P0.05);有淋巴结转移癌组阳性表达率高于无淋巴结转移癌组(uPAx2=13.333,P0.05;uPARx2=15.313,P0.05);差异均有统计学意义;但是与癌症病理类型、病人年龄、肿瘤大小无关。uPA与uPAR的表达存在正相关。结论:在uPA和uPAR可通过促进血管生成和降解细胞外基质(基质)和基底膜,在肿瘤的侵袭和转移中发挥重要作用。uPA及uPAR在上皮性卵巢癌组织中表达上调,支持这些因子在肿瘤浸润和转移中发挥重要作用,二者有可能作为预测上皮性卵巢癌预后的重要参考指标。     

Targeting of tumor cells by cell surface urokinase plasminogen activator-dependent anthrax toxin

Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) binds pro-urokinase plasminogen activator (pro-uPA) and thereby localizes it near plasminogen, causing the generation of active uPA and plasmin on the cell surface. uPAR and uPA are overexpressed in a variety of human tumors and tumor cell lines, and expression of uPAR and uPA is highly correlated to tumor invasion and metastasis. To exploit these characteristics in the design of tumor cell-selective cytotoxins, we constructed mutated anthrax toxin-protective antigen (PrAg) proteins in which the furin cleavage site is replaced by sequences cleaved specifically by uPA. These uPA-targeted PrAg proteins were activated selectively on the surface of uPAR-expressing tumor cells in the presence of pro-uPA and plasminogen. The activated PrAg proteins caused internalization of a recombinant cytotoxin, FP59, consisting of anthrax toxin lethal factor residues 1-254 fused to the ADP-ribosylation domain of Pseudomonas exotoxin A, thereby killing the uPAR-expressing tumor cells. The activation and cytotoxicity of these uPA-targeted PrAg proteins were strictly dependent on the integrity of the tumor cell surface-associated plasminogen activation system. We also constructed a mutated PrAg protein that selectively killed tissue plasminogen activator-expressing cells. These mutated PrAg proteins may be useful as new therapeutic agents for cancer treatment.     

A novel type of bifunctional inhibitor directed against proteolytic activity and receptor/ligand interaction. Cystatin with a urokinase receptor binding site

Cancer invasion and metastasis is a process requiring a coordinated series of (anti-)adhesive, migratory, and pericellular proteolytic events involving various proteases such as urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)/plasmin, cathepsins B and L, and matrix metalloproteases. Novel types of double-headed inhibitors directed to different tumor-associated proteolytic systems were generated by substitution of a loop in chicken cystatin, which is nonessential for cysteine protease inhibition, with uPA-derived peptides covering the human uPA receptor binding sequence uPA-(19-31). The inhibition constants of these hybrids toward cysteine proteases are similar to those of wild-type cystatin (K(i), papain (pm), 1.9-2.4; K(i), cathepsin B (nm), 1.0-1.7; K(i), cathepsin L (pm), 0.12-0.61). FACS analyses revealed that the hybrids compete for binding of uPA to the cell surface-associated uPA receptor (uPAR) expressed on human U937 cells. The simultaneous interaction of the hybrid molecules with papain and uPAR was analyzed by surface plasmon resonance. The measured K(D) value of a papain-bound cystatin variant harboring the uPAR binding sequence of uPA (chCys-uPA-(19-31)) and soluble uPAR was 17 nm (K(D) value for uPA/uPAR interaction, 5 nm). These results indicate that cystatins with a uPAR binding site are efficient inhibitors of cysteine proteases and uPA/uPAR interaction at the same time. Therefore, these compact and small bifunctional inhibitors may represent promising agents for the therapy of solid tumors.     

Suppression of urokinase receptor expression by bikunin is associated with inhibition of upstream targets of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-dependent cascade.

Our laboratory showed that bikunin, a Kunitz-type protease inhibitor, suppresses 4beta-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)- or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha)-induced urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression in different cell types. In addition to its effects on protease inhibition, bikunin could be modulating other cellular events associated with the metastatic cascade. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether bikunin was able to suppress the expression of uPA receptor (uPAR) mRNA and protein in a human chondrosarcoma cell line, HCS-2/8, and two human ovarian cancer cell lines, HOC-I and HRA. The present study showed that (a) bikunin suppresses the expression of constitutive and PMA-induced uPAR mRNA and protein in a variety of cell types; (b) an extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation system is necessary for the PMA-induced increase in uPAR expression, as PD098059 and U0126, which prevent the activation of MEK1, reduce the uPAR expression; (c) bikunin markedly suppresses PMA-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 at the concentration that prevents uPAR expression, but does not reduce total ERK1/2 antigen level; (d) bikunin has no ability to inhibit overexpression of uPAR in cells treated with sodium vanadate; and (e) we further studied the inhibition of uPAR expression by stable transfection of HRA cells with bikunin gene, demonstrating that bikunin secretion is necessary for inhibition of uPAR expression. We conclude that bikunin downregulates constitutive and PMA-stimulated uPAR mRNA and protein possibly through suppression of upstream targets of the ERK-dependent cascade, independent of whether cells were treated with exogenous bikunin or transfected with bikunin gene.     

Proteomic identification of lynchpin urokinase plasminogen activator receptor protein interactions associated with epithelial cancer malignancy

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its high affinity receptor (uPAR) play crucial proteolytic and non-proteolytic roles in cancer metastasis. In addition to promoting plasmin-mediated degradation of extracellular matrix barriers, cell surface engagement of uPA through uPAR binding results in the activation of a suite of diverse cellular signal transduction pathways. Because uPAR is bound to the plasma membrane through a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor, these signalling sequelae are thought to occur through the formation of multi-protein cell surface complexes involving uPAR. To further characterize uPAR-driven protein complexes, we co-immunoprecipitated uPAR from the human ovarian cancer cell line, OVCA 429, and employed sensitive proteomic methods to identify the uPAR-associated proteins. Using this strategy, we identified several known, as well as numerous novel, uPAR associating proteins, including the epithelial restricted integrin, alphavbeta6. Reverse immunoprecipitation using anti-beta6 integrin subunit monoclonal antibodies confirmed the co-purification of this protein with uPAR. Inhibition of uPAR and/or beta6 integrin subunit using neutralizing antibodies resulted in the inhibition of uPA-mediated ERK 1/2 phosphorylation and subsequent cell proliferation. These data suggest that the association of beta6 integrin (and possibly other lynchpin cancer regulatory proteins) with uPAR may be crucial in co-transmitting uPA signals that induce cell proliferation. Our findings support the notion that uPAR behaves as a lynchpin in promoting tumorigenesis by forming functionally active multiprotein complexes.     

Crystal structure of the urokinase receptor in a ligand-free form

The urokinase receptor urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a surface receptor capable of not only focalizing urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)-mediated fibrinolysis to the pericellular micro-environment but also promoting cell migration and chemotaxis. Consistent with this multifunctional role, uPAR binds several extracellular ligands, including uPA and vitronectin. Structural studies suggest that uPAR possesses structural flexibility. It is, however, not clear whether this flexibility is an inherent property of the uPAR structure per se or whether it is induced upon ligand binding. The crystal structure of human uPAR in its ligand-free state would clarify this issue, but such information remains unfortunately elusive. We now report the crystal structures of a stabilized, human uPAR (H47C/N259C) in its ligand-free form to 2.4 Å and in complex with amino-terminal fragment (ATF) to 3.2 Å. The structure of uPAR^H47C/N259C in complex with ATF resembles the wild-type uPAR·ATF complex, demonstrating that these mutations do not perturb the uPA binding properties of uPAR. The present structure of uPAR^H47C/N259C provides the first structural definition of uPAR in its ligand-free form, which represents one of the biologically active conformations of uPAR as defined by extensive biochemical studies. The domain boundary between uPAR DI–DII domains is more flexible than the DII–DIII domain boundary. Two important structural features are highlighted by the present uPAR structure. First, the DI–DIII domain boundary may face the cell membrane. Second, loop 130–140 of uPAR plays a dynamic role during ligand loading/unloading. Together, these studies provide new insights into uPAR structure–function relationships, emphasizing the importance of the inter-domain dynamics of this modular receptor.     

The receptor for the plasminogen activator of urokinase type is up-regulated in transformed rat thyroid cells.

Five rat thyroid cell lines were tested for the expression of the cell surface receptor for urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA). All tested lines were found to bind uPA, but transformed 1-5G and Ki-Mol cells, which are also high uPA producers, bound at least ten times more uPA, as compared to non-producers, 'normal' TL5 cells. Moreover, it was possible to remove membrane-bound uPA by treating the cells with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, suggesting that rat uPAR, like its human counterpart, is linked to the membrane by a glucosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor. The specificity of the binding was tested by competition with three different synthetic peptides corresponding to amino acids 14-37 of human, rat and mouse uPA. The results indicate also that the receptor binding region of rat uPA is located within the growth factor domain of the molecule and that its expression may be dependent on the transformed state of the cells.     

Differential binding of urokinase and peptide antagonists to the urokinase receptor: evidence from characterization of the receptor in four primate species

The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a membrane protein active in localizing the plasminogen activation cascade system on the cell surface. The resulting pericellular proteolytic activity is responsible for degradation reactions in the extracellular matrix that are needed for the invasion of cancer cells, thus making uPAR a potential target for anti-invasive therapy based on binding antagonists. A remarkable property of the uPA-uPAR system is a pronounced species specificity in ligand recognition. We have now cloned and studied uPAR from four primate species and show that even though these sequences contain very few substitutions relative to the human uPAR, the receptor protein products differ markedly in terms of ligand selectivity. Thus, a well described competitive peptide antagonist directed against the human uPAR reacts with only one of the monkey receptors (chimpanzee uPAR), in spite of the fact that uPAR from all of the four species cross-reacts with human uPA. Notably, uPAR from African green monkey, which is completely devoid of reactivity with the peptide, contains only three substitutions relative to chimpanzee uPAR in the molecular regions critical for binding. These findings aid the elucidation of the structure/function relationship of uPAR and, unexpectedly, identify a structural distinction governing the binding of uPA and a very similar peptide antagonist.