Biogenesis of Tim Proteins of the Mitochondrial Carrier Import Pathway: Differential Targeting Mechanisms and Crossing Over with the Main Import Pathway

Two major routes of preprotein targeting into mitochondria are known. Preproteins carrying amino-terminal signals mainly use Tom20, the general import pore (GIP) complex and the Tim23-Tim17 complex. Preproteins with internal signals such as inner membrane carriers use Tom70, the GIP complex, and the special Tim pathway, involving small Tims of the intermembrane space and Tim22-Tim54 of the inner membrane. Little is known about the biogenesis and assembly of the Tim proteins of this carrier pathway. We report that import of the preprotein of Tim22 requires Tom20, although it uses the carrier Tim route. In contrast, the preprotein of Tim54 mainly uses Tom70, yet it follows the Tim23-Tim17 pathway. The positively charged amino-terminal region of Tim54 is required for membrane translocation but not for targeting to Tom70. In addition, we identify two novel homologues of the small Tim proteins and show that targeting of the small Tims follows a third new route where surface receptors are dispensable, yet Tom5 of the GIP complex is crucial. We conclude that the biogenesis of Tim proteins of the carrier pathway cannot be described by either one of the two major import routes, but involves new types of import pathways composed of various features of the hitherto known routes, including crossing over at the level of the GIP.     

Signals involved in targeting membrane proteins to synaptic vesicles

1. Synaptic vesicles (SVs) mediate fast regulated secretion of classical neurotransmitters. In order to perform their task SVs rely on a restrict set of membrane proteins. The mechanisms responsible for targeting these proteins to the SV membrane are still poorly understood.2. Likewise, little is known about the intracellular routes taken by these proteins in their way to SV membrane. Recently, several domains and motifs necessary for correct localization of SV proteins have been identified.3. In this review we summarize the sequence motifs that have been identified in the cytoplasmic domains of SV proteins that are involved in endocytosis and targeting of SVs. We suggest that the vesicular acetylcholine transporter, a protein found predominantly in synaptic vesicles, is perhaps a model protein to understand the pathways and interactions that are used for synaptic vesicle targeting.     

Assembly strategies and GTPase regulation of the eukaryotic and Escherichia coil translocons.

The translocation of most proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum or bacterial inner membrane occurs through an aqueous pore that spans the membrane. Substrates that are translocated co-translationally across the membrane are directed to the translocation pore via an interaction between the cytosolic signal recognition particle and its membrane-bound receptor. Together the translocation pore and the receptor are referred to as a translocon. By studying the biogenesis of the translocon a number of alternate targeting and membrane-integration pathways have been discovered that operate independently of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. The novel assembly strategies of the translocon and the ways in which these components interact to ensure the fidelity and unidirectionality of the targeting and translocation process are reviewed here.     

Pom121 links two essential subcomplexes of the nuclear pore complex core to the membrane

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) control the movement of molecules across the nuclear envelope (NE). We investigated the molecular interactions that exist at the interface between the NPC scaffold and the pore membrane. We show that key players mediating these interactions in mammalian cells are the nucleoporins Nup155 and Nup160. Nup155 depletion massively alters NE structure, causing a dramatic decrease in NPC numbers and the improper targeting of membrane proteins to the inner nuclear membrane. The role of Nup155 in assembly is likely closely linked to events at the membrane as we show that Nup155 interacts with pore membrane proteins Pom121 and NDC1. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the N terminus of Pom121 directly binds the β-propeller regions of Nup155 and Nup160. We propose a model in which the interactions of Pom121 with Nup155 and Nup160 are predicted to assist in the formation of the nuclear pore and the anchoring of the NPC to the pore membrane.     

Signal recognition particle mediated protein targeting in Escherichia coli

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a conserved ribonucleoprotein complex that binds to targeting sequences in nascent secretory and membrane proteins. The SRP guides these proteins to the cytoplasmic membrane in prokaryotes and the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in eukaryotes via an interaction with its cognate receptor. The E. coli SRP is relatively small and is currently used as a model for fundamental and applied studies on translation-linked protein targeting. In this review recent advances in our understanding of the structure and function of the E. coli SRP and its receptor are discussed. In particular, the interplay between the SRP pathway and other targeting routes, the role of guanine nucleotides in cycling of the SRP and the substrate specificity of the SRP are highlighted     

Targeting of membrane proteins to endosomes and lysosomes

The pathways involved in targeting membrane proteins to lysosomes are extraordinarily complex. Newly synthesized proteins in the ER are transported to the Golgi complex, and upon arrival at the trans Golgi network (TGN) are targeted either directly to endosomes, or first to the cell surface from where they can be rapidly internalized into the endocytic pathway for delivery to lysosomes. The routes to endosomes are specified by sorting motifs in the cytoplasmic tails of the proteins that are recognized at the TGN or plasma membrane. The molecular details of these processes are just emerging.     

Signals and Receptors—The Translocation Machinery on the Mitochondrial Surface

Most proteins involved in mitochondrial biogenesis are encoded by the genome of the nucleus.They are synthesized in the cytosol and have to be transported toward and, subsequently,imported into the organelle. This targeting and import process is initiated by the specificmitochondrial targeting signal, which differs pending on the final localization of the protein.The preprotein will be recognized by cytosolic proteins, which function in transport towardthe mitochondria and in maintaining the import competent state of the preprotein. The precursorwill be transferred onto a multicomponent complex on the outer mitochondrial membrane,formed by receptor proteins and the general insertion pore (GIP). Some proteins are directlysorted into the outer membrane whereas the majority will be transported over the outermembrane through the import channel followed by further distribution of those proteins.     

Sphingolipid trafficking--sorted out?

Studies of intracellular membrane traffic have traditionally focused on the protein components of membranes, but what about lipids? Recent findings have drawn attention to the transport of one type of lipid, the sphingolipids. Their unique physical properties may allow them to aggregate into microdomains in membranes that concentrate sphingolipids into specific transport pathways. Gerrit van Meer and Koert Burger consider here the routes of sphingolipid biosynthesis and transport, and the role of proteins in their targeting. The following article by Deborah Brown turns the tables to review the evidence suggesting that sphingolipid domains are important in specific targeting of GPI-anchored proteins to the plasma membrane.     

The three modules of ADP/ATP carrier cooperate in receptor recruitment and translocation into mitochondria

The ADP/ATP carrier (AAC) is a major representative of mitochondrial preproteins lacking an N-terminal presequence. AAC contains targeting information in each of its three modules, which has led to a search for the dominant targeting region. An alternative, not yet tested model would be that several distinct targeting signals function simultaneously in import of the preprotein. We report that the three AAC modules cooperate in binding to the receptor Tom70 such that three Tom70 dimers are recruited to one preprotein. The modules are transferred to the import pore in a stepwise manner and cooperate again in the accumulation of AAC in the general import pore complex. AAC can cross the outer membrane with an internal segment first, i.e. in a loop formation. Each module of AAC is required for dimerization in the inner membrane. We propose a new concept for import of the hydrophobic carrier proteins into mitochondria where multiple signals cooperate in receptor recruitment, outer membrane translocation via loop formation and assembly in the inner membrane.     

Import of bacterial pathogenicity factors into mitochondria

Recent research on the mechanism underlying the interaction of bacterial pathogens with their host has shifted the focus to secreted microbial proteins affecting the physiology and innate immune response of the target cell. These proteins either traverse the plasma membrane via specific entry pathways involving host cell receptors or are directly injected via bacterial secretion systems into the host cell, where they frequently target mitochondria. The import routes of bacterial proteins are mostly unknown, whereas the effect of mitochondrial targeting by these proteins has been investigated in detail. For a number of them, classical leader sequences recognized by the mitochondrial protein import machinery have been identified. Bacterial outer membrane beta-barrel proteins can also be recognized and imported by mitochondrial transporters. Besides an obvious importance in pathogenicity, understanding import of bacterial proteins into mitochondria has a highly relevant evolutionary aspect, considering the endosymbiotic, proteobacterial origin of mitochondria. The review covers the current knowledge on the mitochondrial targeting and import of bacterial pathogenicity factors.     

Signals and structural features involved in integral membrane protein targeting to the inner nuclear membrane

We have examined transfected cells by immunofluorescence microscopy to determine the signals and structural features required for the targeting of integral membrane proteins to the inner nuclear membrane. Lamin B receptor (LBR) is a resident protein of the nuclear envelope inner membrane that has a nucleoplasmic, amino-terminal domain and a carboxyl-terminal domain with eight putative transmembrane segments. The amino-terminal domain of LBR can target both a cytosolic protein to the nucleus and a type II integral protein to the inner nuclear membrane. Neither a nuclear localization signal (NLS) of a soluble protein, nor full-length histone H1, can target an integral protein to the inner nuclear membrane although they can target cytosolic proteins to the nucleus. The addition of an NLS to a protein normally located in the inner nuclear membrane, however, does not inhibit its targeting. When the amino-terminal domain of LBR is increased in size from approximately 22.5 to approximately 70 kD, the chimeric protein cannot reach the inner nuclear membrane. The carboxyl-terminal domain of LBR, separated from the amino-terminal domain, also concentrates in the inner nuclear membrane, demonstrating two nonoverlapping targeting signals in this protein. Signals and structural features required for the inner nuclear membrane targeting of proteins are distinct from those involved in targeting soluble polypeptides to the nucleoplasm. The structure of the nucleocytoplasmic domain of an inner nuclear membrane protein also influences targeting, possibly because of size constraints dictated by the lateral channels of the nuclear pore complexes.     

SecA is not required for signal recognition particle-mediated targeting and initial membrane insertion of a nascent inner membrane protein.

In Escherichia coli, signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of inner membrane proteins has been described. In vitro cross-linking studies have demonstrated that short nascent chains exposing a highly hydrophobic targeting signal interact with the SRP. This SRP, assisted by its receptor, FtsY, mediates the transfer to a common translocation site in the inner membrane that contains SecA, SecG, and SecY. Here we describe a further in vitro reconstitution of SRP-mediated membrane insertion in which purified ribosome-nascent chain-SRP complexes are targeted to the purified SecYEG complex contained in proteoliposomes in a process that requires the SRP-receptor FtsY and GTP. We found that in this system SecA and ATP are dispensable for both the transfer of the nascent inner membrane protein FtsQ to SecY and its stable membrane insertion. Release of the SRP from nascent FtsQ also occurred in the absence of SecYEG complex indicating a functional interaction of FtsY with lipids. These data suggest that SRP/FtsY and SecB/SecA constitute distinct targeting routes.     

In Vitro Studies with Purified Components Reveal Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) and SecA/SecB as Constituents of Two Independent Protein-targeting Pathways of Escherichia coli

The molecular requirements for the translocation of secretory proteins across, and the integration of membrane proteins into, the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli were compared. This was achieved in a novel cell-free system from E. coli which, by extensive subfractionation, was simultaneously rendered deficient in SecA/SecB and the signal recognition particle (SRP) components, Ffh (P48), 4. 5S RNA, and FtsY. The integration of two membrane proteins into inside-out plasma membrane vesicles of E. coli required all three SRP components and could not be driven by SecA, SecB, and DeltamicroH+. In contrast, these were the only components required for the translocation of secretory proteins into membrane vesicles, a process in which the SRP components were completely inactive. Our results, while confirming previous in vivo studies, provide the first in vitro evidence for the dependence of the integration of polytopic inner membrane proteins on SRP in E. coli. Furthermore, they suggest that SRP and SecA/SecB have different substrate specificities resulting in two separate targeting mechanisms for membrane and secretory proteins in E. coli. Both targeting pathways intersect at the translocation pore because they are equally affected by a blocked translocation channel.     

Perspectives on the mitochondrial multiple conductance channel

A multiple conductance channel (MCC) with a peak conductance of over 1 nS is recorded from mitoplasts (mitochondria with the inner membrane exposed) using patch-clamp techniques. MCC shares many general characteristics with other intracellular megachannels, many of which are weakly selective, voltage-dependent, and calcium sensitive. A role in protein import is suggested by the transient blockade of MCC by peptides responsible for targeting mitochondrial precursor proteins. MCC is compared with the peptide-sensitive channel of the outer membrane because of similarities in targeting peptide blockade. The pharmacology and regulation of MCC by physiological effectors are reviewed and compared with the properties of the pore hypothesized to be responsible for the mitochondrial inner membrane permeability transition.     

H-ras but not K-ras traffics to the plasma membrane through the exocytic pathway

Ras proteins must be localized to the inner surface of the plasma membrane to be biologically active. The motifs that effect Ras plasma membrane targeting consist of a C-terminal CAAX motif plus a second signal comprising palmitoylation of adjacent cysteine residues or the presence of a polybasic domain. In this study, we examined how Ras proteins access the cell surface after processing of the CAAX motif is completed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We show that palmitoylated CAAX proteins, in addition to being localized at the plasma membrane, are found throughout the exocytic pathway and accumulate in the Golgi region when cells are incubated at 15 degrees C. In contrast, polybasic CAAX proteins are found only at the cell surface and not in the exocytic pathway. CAAX proteins which lack a second signal for plasma membrane targeting accumulate in the ER and Golgi. Brefeldin A (BFA) significantly inhibits the plasma membrane accumulation of newly synthesized, palmitoylated CAAX proteins without inhibiting their palmitoylation. BFA has no effect on the trafficking of polybasic CAAX proteins. We conclude that H-ras and K-ras traffic to the cell surface through different routes and that the polybasic domain is a sorting signal diverting K-Ras out of the classical exocytic pathway proximal to the Golgi. Farnesylated Ras proteins that lack a polybasic domain reach the Golgi but require palmitoylation in order to traffic further to the cell surface. These data also indicate that a Ras palmitoyltransferase is present in an early compartment of the exocytic pathway.     

The type-2 peroxisomal targeting signal

The type-2 peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS2) is one of two peptide motifs destining soluble proteins for peroxisomes. This signal acts as amphiphilic α-helix exposing the side chains of all conserved residues to the same side. PTS2 motifs are recognized by a bipartite protein complex consisting of the receptor PEX7 and a co-receptor. Cargo-loaded receptor complexes are translocated across the peroxisomal membrane by a transient pore and inside peroxisomes, cargo proteins are released and processed in many, but not all species. The components of the bipartite receptor are re-exported into the cytosol by a ubiquitin-mediated and ATP-driven export mechanism. Structurally, PTS2 motifs resemble other N-terminal targeting signals, whereas the functional relation to the second peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1) is unclear. Although only a few PTS2-carrying proteins are known in humans, subjects lacking a functional import mechanism for these proteins suffer from the severe inherited disease rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata.     

Diffusion and retention are major determinants of protein targeting to the inner nuclear membrane

Newly synthesized membrane proteins are constantly sorted from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to various membranous compartments. How proteins specifically enrich at the inner nuclear membrane (INM) is not well understood. We have established a visual in vitro assay to measure kinetics and investigate requirements of protein targeting to the INM. Using human LBR, SUN2, and LAP2β as model substrates, we show that INM targeting is energy-dependent but distinct from import of soluble cargo. Accumulation of proteins at the INM relies on both a highly interconnected ER network, which is affected by energy depletion, and an efficient immobilization step at the INM. Nucleoporin depletions suggest that translocation through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) is rate-limiting and restricted by the central NPC scaffold. Our experimental data combined with mathematical modeling support a diffusion-retention–based mechanism of INM targeting. We experimentally confirmed the sufficiency of diffusion and retention using an artificial reporter lacking natural sorting signals that recapitulates the energy dependence of the process in vivo.     

The ER protein Ema19 facilitates the degradation of nonimported mitochondrial precursor proteins

For the biogenesis of mitochondria, hundreds of proteins need to be targeted from the cytosol into the various compartments of this organelle. The intramitochondrial targeting routes these proteins take to reach their respective location in the organelle are well understood. However, the early targeting processes, from cytosolic ribosomes to the membrane of the organelle, are still largely unknown. In this study, we present evidence that an integral membrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Ema19, plays a role in this process. Mutants lacking Ema19 show an increased stability of mitochondrial precursor proteins, indicating that Ema19 promotes the proteolytic degradation of nonproductive precursors. The deletion of Ema19 improves the growth of respiration-deficient cells, suggesting that Ema19-mediated degradation can compete with productive protein import into mitochondria. Ema19 is the yeast representative of a conserved protein family. The human Ema19 homologue is known as sigma 2 receptor or TMEM97. Though its molecular function is not known, previous studies suggested a role of the sigma 2 receptor as a quality control factor in the ER, compatible with our observations about Ema19. More globally, our data provide an additional demonstration of the important role of the ER in mitochondrial protein targeting.     

Sec-dependent protein translocation across biological membranes: evolutionary conservation of an essential protein transport pathway (Review)

All living organisms, no matter how simple or complex, possess the ability to translocate proteins across biological membranes and into different cellular compartments. Although a range of membrane transport processes exist, the major pathway used to translocate proteins across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane or the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum membrane is conserved and is known as the Sec or Sec61 pathway, respectively. Over the past two decades the Sec and Sec61 pathways have been studied extensively and are well characterised at the genetic and biochemical levels. However, it is only now with the recent structural determination of a number of the key elements of the pathways that the translocation complex is beginning to give up its secrets in exquisite molecular detail. This article will focus on the routes of Sec- and Sec61-dependent membrane targeting and the nature of the translocation channel in bacteria and eukaryotes.