Structural biology of human cannabinoid receptor-2 helix 6 in membrane-mimetic environments

We detail the structure and dynamics of a synthetic peptide corresponding to transmembrane helix 6 (TMH6) of human cannabinoid receptor-2 (hCB2) in biomembrane-mimetic environments. The peptide’s NMR structural biology is characterized by two α-helical domains bridged by a flexible, nonhelical hinge region containing a highly-conserved CWFP motif with an environmentally sensitive, Pro-based conformational switch. Buried within the peptide’s flexible region, W²⁵⁸ may hydrogen-bond with L²⁵⁵ to help stabilize the Pro-kinked hCB2 TMH6 structure and position C²⁵⁷ advantageously for interaction with agonist ligands. These characteristics of hCB2 TMH6 are potential structural features of ligand-induced hCB2 activation in vivo.     

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of human cannabinoid receptor 2: covalent cysteine 6.47(257)-ligand interaction affording megagonist receptor activation

The lack of experimental characterization of the structures and ligand-binding motifs of therapeutic G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) hampers rational drug discovery. The human cannabinoid receptor 2 (hCB2R) is a class-A GPCR and promising therapeutic target for small-molecule cannabinergic agonists as medicines. Prior mutational and modeling data constitute provisional evidence that AM-841, a high-affinity classical cannabinoid, interacts with cysteine C6.47(257) in hCB2R transmembrane helix 6 (TMH6) to afford improved hCB2R selectivity and unprecedented agonist potency. We now apply bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics to define directly the hCB2R-AM-841 interaction at the amino-acid level. Recombinant hCB2R, overexpressed as an N-terminal FLAG-tagged/C-terminal 6His-tagged protein (FLAG-hCB2R-6His) with a baculovirus system, was solubilized and purified by immunochromatography as functional receptor. A multiplex multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-MS method was developed that allowed us to observe unambiguously all seven discrete TMH peptides in the tryptic digest of purified FLAG-hCB2R-6His and demonstrate that AM-841 modifies hCB2R TMH6 exclusively. High-resolution mass spectra of the TMH6 tryptic peptide obtained by Q-TOF MS/MS analysis demonstrated that AM-841 covalently and selectively modifies hCB2R at TMH6 cysteine C6.47(257). These data demonstrate how integration of MS-based proteomics into a ligand-assisted protein structure (LAPS) experimental paradigm can offer guidance to structure-enabled GPCR agonist design.     

The conformation of the cytoplasmic helix 8 of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor using NMR and circular dichroism

The cytoplasmic helix domain (fourth cytoplasmic loop, helix 8) of numerous GPCRs such as rhodopsin and the β-adrenergic receptor exhibits unique structural and functional characteristics. Computational models also predict the existence of such a structural motif within the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, another member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. To gain insights into the conformational properties of this GPCR component, a peptide corresponding to helix 8 of the CB1 receptor with a small contiguous segment from transmembrane helix 7 (TM7) was chemically synthesized and its secondary structure determined by circular dichroism (CD) and solution NMR spectroscopy. Our studies in DPC and SDS micelles revealed significant α-helical structure while in an aqueous medium, the peptide exhibited a random coil configuration. The relative orientation of helix 8 within the CB1 receptor was obtained from intermolecular ³¹P-¹H and ¹H-¹H NOE measurements. Our results suggest that in the presence of an amphipathic membrane environment, helix 8 assumes an alpha helical structure with an orientation parallel to the phospholipid membrane surface and perpendicular to TM7. In this model, positively charged side chains interact with the lipid headgroups while the other polar side chains face the aqueous region. The above observations may be relevant to the activation/deactivation of the CB1 receptor.     

Structural Insights into Conformational Stability of Wild-Type and Mutant β1-Adrenergic Receptor

Recent experiments to derive a thermally stable mutant of turkey beta-1-adrenergic receptor (β₁AR) have shown that a combination of six single point mutations resulted in a 20°C increase in thermal stability in mutant β₁AR. Here we have used the all-atom force-field energy function to calculate a stability score to detect stabilizing point mutations in G-protein coupled receptors. The calculated stability score shows good correlation with the measured thermal stability for 76 single point mutations and 22 multiple mutants in β₁AR. We have demonstrated that conformational sampling of the receptor for various mutants improve the prediction of thermal stability by 50%. Point mutations Y227A^5.58, V230A^5.61, and F338M^7.48 in the thermally stable mutant m23-β₁AR stabilizes key microdomains of the receptor in the inactive conformation. The Y227A^5.58 and V230A^5.61 mutations stabilize the ionic lock between R139^3.50 on transmembrane helix3 and E285^6.30 on transmembrane helix6. The mutation F338M^7.48 on TM7 alters the interaction of the conserved motif NPxxY(x)_5,6F with helix8 and hence modulates the interaction of TM2-TM7-helix8 microdomain. The D186-R317 salt bridge (in extracellular loops 2 and 3) is stabilized in the cyanopindolol-bound wild-type β₁AR, whereas the salt bridge between D184-R317 is preferred in the mutant m23. We propose that this could be the surrogate to a similar salt bridge found between the extracellular loop 2 and TM7 in β₂AR reported recently. We show that the binding energy difference between the inactive and active states is less in m23 compared to the wild-type, which explains the activation of m23 at higher norepinephrine concentration compared to the wild-type. Results from this work throw light into the mechanism behind stabilizing mutations. The computational scheme proposed in this work could be used to design stabilizing mutations for other G-protein coupled receptors.     

A competing salt-bridge suppresses helix formation by the isolated C-peptide carboxylate of ribonuclease A

The C-peptide of ribonuclease A (residues 1 to 13) is obtained by cyanogen bromide cleavage at Met13, which converts methionine to a mixture of homoserine lactone (giving C-peptide lactone) and homoserine carboxylate (giving C-peptide carboxylate). The helix-forming properties of C-peptide lactone have been reported. The helix is formed intramolecularly in aqueous solution, is stabilized at low temperatures (0 to 20 °C) and also by a pH-dependent interaction between sidechains. The C-peptide lactone helix is about 1000-fold more stable than expected from “host-guest” data for helix formation in synthetic polypeptides.Here we report the failure of C-peptide carboxylate to form an α-helix in comparable conditions. Formation of a salt-bridge between the α-COO^? group and the imidazolium ring of His12⁺ appears to be responsible for the suppression of helix formation. The presence of the Hse13-COO^? … His12⁺ salt-bridge in C-peptide carboxylate is shown by ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance titration of the amide proton resonances of His12 and Hse13, and is expected from model peptide studies. The most probable reason why C-peptide carboxylate does not form an α-helix is that the Hse13-COO^? … His12⁺ salt-bridge competes successfully with a helix stabilizing salt-bridge (Glu9^? … His12⁺).S-peptide (residues 1 to 20 of ribonuclease A) does form an α-helix with properties similar to those of the C-peptide (lactone) helix, which shows that the lactone ring of C-peptide lactone is not needed for helix formation.These results support the hypothesis that a Glu9^? … His12⁺ salt-bridge stabilizes the C-peptide (lactone) helix, and they show that specific interactions between side-chains can be important in preventing as well as in promoting α-helix formation.     

Structure and dynamics of the M13 coat signal sequence in membranes by multidimensional high-resolution and solid-state NMR spectroscopy

The polypeptide corresponding to the signal sequence of the M13 coat protein and the five N-terminal residues of the mature protein was prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis with a ¹⁵N isotopic label at the alanine-12 position. Multidimensional solution NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling calculations indicate that this polypeptide assumes helical conformations between residues 5 and 20, in the presence of sodium dodecylsulfate micelles. This is in good agreement with circular dichroism spectroscopic measurement, which shows an α-helix content of approximately 42%. The α-helix comprises an uninterrupted hydrophobic stretch of ≤12 amino acids, which is generally believed to be too short for a stable transmembrane alignment in a biological bilayer. The monoexponential proton-deuterium exchange kinetics of this hydrophobic helical region is characterized by half-lives of 15–75 minutes (pH 4.2, 323 K). When the polypeptide is reconstituted into phospholipid bilayers, the broad anisotropy of the proton-decoupled ¹⁵N solid-state NMR spectroscopy indicates that the hydrophobic helix is immobilized close to the lipid bilayer surface at the time scale of ¹⁵N solid-state NMR spectroscopy (10⁻⁴ seconds). By contrast, short correlation times, immediate hydrogen-deuterium exchange as well as nuclear Overhauser effect crosspeak analysis suggest that the N and C termini of this polypeptide exhibit a mobile random coil structure. The implications of these structural findings for possible mechanisms of membrane insertion and translocation as well as for membrane protein structure prediction algorithms are discussed. © 1997 Wiley-Liss Inc.     

Conformational and dynamics simulation study of antimicrobial peptide hedistin—heterogeneity of its helix–turn–helix motif

Hedistin is an antimicrobial peptide isolated from the coelomocytes of Nereis diversicolor, possessing activity against a large spectrum of bacteria including the methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio alginolyticus. The three-dimensional structure of hedistin in both aqueous solution and deuterated dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles was examined using circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques. And, the early events of the antibacterial process of hedistin were simulated using palmitoyl-oleoyl-phophatidylcholine (POPC) lipid bilayers and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation methods. Hedistin lacks secondary structure in aqueous solution, however, in DPC micelles, it features with a heterogeneous helix–turn–helix moiety and exhibits obvious amphipathic nature. The turn region (residues Val9–Thr12) in the moiety is a four-residue hinge, lying in between the first N-terminal α-helix (residues Leu5–Lys8) and the second α-helix (residues Val13–Ala17) regions and causing an ～ 120° angle between the axes of the two helices. The segmental and nonlinear nature of hedistin structure is referred to as the heterogeneity of its helix–turn–helix motif which was found to be corresponding to a kind of discrete dynamics behavior, herein coined as its dynamical heterogeneity, at the early stage (0–50 ns) of the MD simulations. That is, the first helix segment, prior to (at 310 K) or following (at 363 K) the second helix, binds to the lipid head-group region and subsequently permeates into the hydrophobic lipid tail region, and the hinge is the last portion entering the lipid environment. This result implies that hedistin may adopt a “carpet” model action when disrupting bacterial membrane.     

Helix-helix interactions and their impact on protein motifs and assemblies

Protein secondary structure elements are arranged in distinct structural motifs such as four-α-helix bundle, 8α/8β TIM-barrel, Rossmann dinucleotide binding fold, assembly of a helical rod. Each structural motif is characterized by a particular type of helix-helix interactions. A unique pattern of contacts is formed by interacting helices of the structural motif. In each type of fold, edges of the helix surface, which participate in the formation of helix-helix contacts with preceding and following helices, differ. This work shows that circular arrangements of the four, eight, and sixteen α-helices, which are found in the four-α-helical motif, TIM-barrel 8α/8β fold, and helical rod of 16.3¯ helices per turn correspondingly, can be associated with the mutual positioning of the edges of the helix surfaces. Edges (i, i+1)−(i+1, i+2) of the helix surface are central for the interhelical contacts in a four-α-helix bundle. Edges (i, i+1)−(i+2, i+3) are involved in the assembly of four-α-helix subunits into helical rod of a tobacco mosaic virus and a three-helix fragment of a Rossmann fold. In 8α/8β TIM-barrel fold, edges (i, i+1)−(i+5, i+6) are involved in the octagon arrangement. Approximation of a cross section of each motif with a polygon (n-gon, n=4, 8, 16) shows that a good correlation exists between polygon interior angles and angles formed by the edges of helix surfaces.     

The Role of Arrestin α-Helix I in Receptor Binding

Arrestins rapidly bind phosphorylated activated forms of their cognate G protein-coupled receptors, thereby preventing G protein coupling and often switching signaling to other pathways. Amphipathic α-helix I (residues 100-111) has been implicated in receptor binding, but the mechanism of its action has not been determined yet. Here we show that several mutations in the helix itself and in adjacent hydrophobic residues in the body of the N-domain reduce arrestin1 binding to light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh^?). On the background of phosphorylation-independent mutants that bind with high affinity to both P-Rh^? and light-activated unphosphorylated rhodopsin, these mutations reduce the stability of the arrestin complex with P-Rh^?, but not with light-activated unphosphorylated rhodopsin. Using site-directed spin labeling, we found that the local structure around α-helix I changes upon binding to rhodopsin. However, the intramolecular distances between α-helix I and adjacent β-strand I (or the rest of the N-domain), measured using double electron-electron resonance, do not change, ruling out relocation of the helix due to receptor binding. Collectively, these data demonstrate that α-helix I plays an indirect role in receptor binding, likely keeping β-strand I, which carries several phosphate-binding residues, in a position favorable for its interaction with receptor-attached phosphates.     

Solution structure of the TatB component of the twin-arginine translocation system

The twin-arginine protein transport (Tat) system translocates fully folded proteins across lipid membranes. In Escherichia coli, the Tat system comprises three essential components: TatA, TatB and TatC. The protein translocation process is proposed to initiate by signal peptide recognition and substrate binding to the TatBC complex. Upon formation of the TatBC–substrate protein complex, the TatA subunits are recruited and form the protein translocation pore. Experimental evidences suggest that TatB forms a tight complex with TatC at 1:1 molar ratio and the TatBC complex contains multiple copies of both proteins. Cross-linking experiments demonstrate that TatB functions in tetrameric units and interacts with both TatC and substrate proteins. However, structural information of the TatB protein is still lacking, and its functional mechanism remains elusive. Herein, we report the solution structure of TatB in DPC micelles determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Overall, the structure shows an extended ‘L-shape’ conformation comprising four helices: a transmembrane helix (TMH) α1, an amphipathic helix (APH) α2, and two solvent exposed helices α3 and α4. The packing of TMH and APH is relatively rigid, whereas helices α3 and α4 display notably higher mobility. The observed floppiness of helices α3 and α4 allows TatB to sample a large conformational space, thus providing high structural plasticity to interact with substrate proteins of different sizes and shapes.     

Solution structure of the first and second transmembrane segments of the mitochondrial oxoglutarate carrier

The structures of the first and the second transmembrane segment of the bovine mitochondrial oxoglutarate carrier (OGC) were studied by circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopies. Peptides 21–46 and 78–108 of its primary sequence were synthesized and structurally characterized in membrane-mimetic environments. CD data showed that at high concentrations of TFE (>50%) and SDS (>2%) both peptides assume α-helical structures, whereas in more hydrophilic environments only peptide 78–108 has a helical structure. ¹H-NMR spectra of the two peptides in TFE/water and SDS were fully assigned, and the secondary structures of the peptides were obtained from nuclear Overhauser effects, ³J_αH-NH coupling constants and αH chemical shifts. The three-dimensional solution structures of the peptides in TFE/water were generated by distance geometry calculations. A well-defined α-helix was found in the region K24-V39 of peptide 21–46 and in the region A86–F106 of peptide 78–108. We cannot exclude that in intact OGC the extension of these helices is longer. The helix of peptide 21–46 is essentially hydrophobic, whereas that of peptide 78–108 is predominantly hydrophilic.     

Thermodynamic model of secondary structure for α-helical peptides and proteins

A thermodynamic model describing formation of α-helices by peptides and proteins in the absence of specific tertiary interactions has been developed. The model combines free energy terms defining α-helix stability in aqueous solution and terms describing immersion of every helix or fragment of coil into a micelle or a nonpolar droplet created by the rest of protein to calculate averaged or lowest energy partitioning of the peptide chain into helical and coil fragments. The α-helix energy in water was calculated with parameters derived from peptide substitution and protein engineering data and using estimates of nonpolar contact areas between side chains. The energy of nonspecific hydrophobic interactions was estimated considering each α-helix or fragment of coil as freely floating in the spherical micelle or droplet, and using water/cyclohexane (for micelles) or adjustable (for proteins) side-chain transfer energies. The model was verified for 96 and 36 peptides studied by ¹H-nmr spectroscopy in aqueous solution and in the presence of micelles, respectively ([set I] and [set 2]) and for 30 mostly α-helical globular proteins ([set 3]). For peptides, the experimental helix locations were identified from the published medium-range nuclear Overhauser effects detected by ¹H-nmr spectroscopy. For sets 1, 2, and 3, respectively, 93, 100, and 97% of helices were identified with average errors in calculation of helix boundaries of 1.3, 2.0, and 4.1 residues per helix and an average percentage of correctly calculated helix—coil states of 93, 89, and 81%, respectively. Analysis of adjustable parameters of the model (the entropy and enthalpy of the helix—coil transition, the transfer energy of the helix backbone, and parameters of the bound coil), determined by minimization of the average helix boundary deviation for each set of peptides or proteins, demonstrates that, unlike micelles, the interior of the effective protein droplet has solubility characteristics different from that for cyclohexane, does not bind fragments of coil, and lacks interfacial area. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 42: 239–269, 1997     

From molecular details of the interplay between transmembrane helices of the thyrotropin receptor to general aspects of signal transduction in family a G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

Transmembrane helices (TMHs) 5 and 6 are known to be important for signal transduction by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Our aim was to characterize the interface between TMH5 and TMH6 of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) to gain molecular insights into aspects of signal transduction and regulation. A proline at TMH5 position 5.50 is highly conserved in family A GPCRs and causes a twist in the helix structure. Mutation of the TSHR-specific alanine (Ala-593^5.50) at this position to proline resulted in a 20-fold reduction of cell surface expression. This indicates that TMH5 in the TSHR might have a conformation different from most other family A GPCRs by forming a regular α-helix. Furthermore, linking our own and previous data from directed mutagenesis with structural information led to suggestions of distinct pairs of interacting residues between TMH5 and TMH6 that are responsible for stabilizing either the basal or the active state. Our insights suggest that the inactive state conformation is constrained by a core set of polar interactions among TMHs 2, 3, 6, and 7 and in contrast that the active state conformation is stabilized mainly by non-polar interactions between TMHs 5 and 6. Our findings might be relevant for all family A GPCRs as supported by a statistical analysis of residue properties between the TMHs of a vast number of GPCR sequences.     

Identification of an “α-helix-extended segment-α-helix” conformation of the sixth transmembrane domain in DMT1

DMT1 (divalent metal ion transporter 1) is one member of a family of proton-coupled transporters that facilitate the cellular absorption of divalent metal ions. A pair of mutation-sensitive and highly conserved histidines in the sixth transmembrane domain (TM6) of DMT1 was found to be important for proton-metal ion cotransport. In the present work, we investigate the structures and locations of the peptides from TM6 of DMT1 and its H267A and H272A mutants in SDS micelles by CD and NMR methods. The circular dichroism studies show that the α-helix is a predominant conformation for the wildtype peptide and H267A mutant in SDS micelles, whereas the helicity is evidently decreased for H272A mutant. The pH value has little effect on the α-helical contents of the three peptides. The NMR studies indicate that the wildtype peptide in SDS micelles forms an “α-helix-extended segment-α-helix” structure in which the His267 locates near the central part of the extended segment, while the His272 is involved in the α-helical folding. Both histidines are buried in SDS micelles as evidenced by their pK_a values. The structure of the wildtype peptide is evidently changed by the mutations of H267A and H272A. The H267A mutant forms an ordered structure consisting of an α-helix from the C-terminus to the central part and continuous turns in the residual part. The extended structure in the central part of the wildtype peptide is abolished by H267A mutation. The H272A mutation mainly induces unfolding of the short helix in the N-terminal side, while the short helix in the C-terminal side and unordered conformation in the central part remain. All the three peptides are embedded in SDS micelles, and the H267A mutant is inserted more deeply due to increasing hydrophobicity in the central part of the peptide. The specific “α-helix-extended segment-α-helix” structure of TM6 may have an important implication for the binding of the transporter to H⁺ and metal ions and the conformation change induced by the mutations of two highly conserved histidines may be correlated to the deficiency of the transport activity of DMT1.     

Synthetic α-helical peptides incorporating intercalators for DNA recognition

The design and synthesis of a water-soluble 14-residue peptide, in which a quinoline intercalator is attached to the peptide backbone via alkylation of a central cysteine residue, is reported. 600 MHz ¹H NMR spectroscopy and circular dichroism indicate that the peptide forms a nascent helix in aqueous solution, ie. an ensemble of turn-like structures over several adjacent residues in the peptide. A large number of sequential d_NN(i, i+1) connectivities were observed in NOESY spectra, and titration of trifluoroethanol into a solution of the peptide resulted in the characteristic CD spectrum expected for an α-helix. At low DNA concentrations, CD spectroscopy indicates that this helical conformation is stabilized, presumably due to folding of the peptide in the major groove of DNA.     

Amino Acid Insertion Reveals a Necessary Three-Helical Intermediate in the Folding Pathway of the Colicin E7 Immunity Protein Im7

The small (87-residue) α-helical protein Im7 (an inhibitor protein for colicin E7 that provides immunity to cells producing colicin E7) folds via a three-state mechanism involving an on-pathway intermediate. This kinetic intermediate contains three of four native helices that are oriented in a non-native manner so as to minimise exposed hydrophobic surface area at this point in folding. The short (6-residue) helix III has been shown to be unstructured in the intermediate ensemble and does not dock onto the developing hydrophobic core until after the rate-limiting transition state has been traversed. After helix III has docked, it adopts an α-helical secondary structure, and the side chains of residues within this region provide contacts that are crucial to native-state stability. In order to probe further the role of helix III in the folding mechanism of Im7, we created a variant that contains an eight-amino-acid polyalanine-like helix stabilised by a Glu-Arg salt bridge and an Asn-Pro-Gly capping motif, juxtaposed C-terminal to the natural 6-residue helix III. The effect of this insertion on the structure of the native protein and its folding mechanism were studied using NMR and ?-value analysis, respectively. The results reveal a robust native structure that is not perturbed by the presence of the extended helix III. Mutational analysis performed to probe the folding mechanism of the redesigned protein revealed a conserved mechanism involving the canonical three-helical intermediate. The results suggest that folding via a three-helical species stabilised by both native and non-native interactions is an essential feature of Im7 folding, independent of the helical propensity of helix III.     

Dynamic conformational equilibria in the physiological function of the Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein

The Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein (BmorPBP) undergoes a pH-dependent conformational transition from a form at basic pH, which contains an open cavity suitable for ligand binding (BmorPBP^B), to a form at pH 4.5, where this cavity is occupied by an additional helix (BmorPBP^A). This helix α7 is formed by the C-terminal dodecapeptide 131-142, which is flexibly disordered on the protein surface in BmorPBP^B and in its complex with the pheromone bombykol. Previous work showed that the ligand-binding cavity cannot accommodate both bombykol and helix α7. Here we further investigated mechanistic aspects of the physiologically crucial ejection of the ligand at lower pH values by solution NMR studies of the variant protein BmorPBP(1-128), where the C-terminal helix-forming tetradecapeptide is removed. The NMR structure of the truncated protein at pH 6.5 corresponds closely to BmorPBP^B. At pH 4.5, BmorPBP(1-128) maintains a B-type structure that is in a slow equilibrium, on the NMR chemical shift timescale, with a low-pH conformation for which a discrete set of ¹⁵N-¹H correlation peaks is NMR unobservable. The full NMR spectrum was recovered upon readjusting the pH of the protein solution to 6.5. These data reveal dual roles for the C-terminal tetradecapeptide of BmorPBP in the mechanism of reversible pheromone binding and transport, where it governs dynamic equilibria between two locally different protein conformations at acidic pH and competes with the ligand for binding to the interior cavity.     

ω-Helices in Proteins

A modification of the α-helix, termed the ω-helix, has four residues in one turn of a helix. We searched the ω-helix in proteins by the HELFIT program which determines the helical parameters—pitch, residues per turn, radius, and handedness—and p = rmsd/(N ? 1)^1/2 estimating helical regularity, where “rmsd” is the root mean square deviation from the best fit helix and “N” is helix length. A total of 1,496 regular α-helices 6–9 residues long with p ≤ 0.10 Å were identified from 866 protein chains. The statistical analysis provides a strong evidence that the frequency distribution of helices versus n indicates the bimodality of typical α-helix and ω-helix. Sixty-two right handed ω-helices identified (7.2% of proteins) show non-planarity of the peptide groups. There is amino acid preference of Asp and Cys. These observations and analyses insist that the ω-helices occur really in proteins.