SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data

We present 'significance analysis of interactome' (SAINT), a computational tool that assigns confidence scores to protein-protein interaction data generated using affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS). The method uses label-free quantitative data and constructs separate distributions for true and false interactions to derive the probability of a bona fide protein-protein interaction. We show that SAINT is applicable to data of different scales and protein connectivity and allows transparent analysis of AP-MS data.     

Label-free quantitative proteomics and SAINT analysis enable interactome mapping for the human Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 5

Affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) represents a powerful and proven approach for the analysis of protein-protein interactions. However, the detection of true interactions for proteins that are commonly considered background contaminants is currently a limitation of AP-MS. Here using spectral counts and the new statistical tool, Significance Analysis of INTeractome (SAINT), true interaction between the serine/threonine protein phosphatase 5 (PP5) and a chaperonin, heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), is discerned. Furthermore, we report and validate a new interaction between PP5 and an Hsp90 adaptor protein, stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 (STIP1; HOP). Mutation of PP5, replacing key basic amino acids (K97A and R101A) in the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) region known to be necessary for the interactions with Hsp90, abolished both the known interaction of PP5 with cell division cycle 37 homolog and the novel interaction of PP5 with stress-induced phosphoprotein 1. Taken together, the results presented demonstrate the usefulness of label-free quantitative proteomics and statistical tools to discriminate between noise and true interactions, even for proteins normally considered as background contaminants.     

A cost-benefit analysis of multidimensional fractionation of affinity purification-mass spectrometry samples

Affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is gaining widespread use for the identification of protein-protein interactions. It is unclear, however, whether typical AP sample complexity is limiting for the identification of all protein components using standard one-dimensional LC-MS/MS. Multidimensional sample separation is useful for reducing sample complexity prior to MS analysis and increases peptide and protein coverage of complex samples. Here, we monitored the effects of upstream protein or peptide separation techniques on typical mammalian AP-MS samples, generated by FLAG affinity purification of four baits with different biological functions and/or subcellular distribution. As a first separation step, we employed SDS-PAGE, strong cation exchange LC, or reversed-phase LC at basic pH. We also analyzed the benefits of using an instrument with a faster scan rate, the new TripleTOF 5600 mass spectrometer. While all multidimensional approaches yielded a clear increase in spectral counts, the increase in unique peptides and additional protein identification was modest and came at the cost of increased instrument and handling time. The use of a high duty-cycle instrument achieved similar benefits without these drawbacks. An increase in spectral counts is beneficial when data analysis methods relying on spectral counts, including Significance Analysis of INTeractome (SAINT), are used.     

Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics

Recent studies have revealed a relationship between protein abundance and sampling statistics, such as sequence coverage, peptide count, and spectral count, in label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) shotgun proteomics. The use of sampling statistics offers a promising method of measuring relative protein abundance and detecting differentially expressed or coexpressed proteins. We performed a systematic analysis of various approaches to quantifying differential protein expression in eukaryotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae and prokaryotic Rhodopseudomonas palustris label-free LC-MS/MS data. First, we showed that, among three sampling statistics, the spectral count has the highest technical reproducibility, followed by the less-reproducible peptide count and relatively nonreproducible sequence coverage. Second, we used spectral count statistics to measure differential protein expression in pairwise experiments using five statistical tests: Fisher's exact test, G-test, AC test, t-test, and LPE test. Given the S. cerevisiae data set with spiked proteins as a benchmark and the false positive rate as a metric, our evaluation suggested that the Fisher's exact test, G-test, and AC test can be used when the number of replications is limited (one or two), whereas the t-test is useful with three or more replicates available. Third, we generalized the G-test to increase the sensitivity of detecting differential protein expression under multiple experimental conditions. Out of 1622 identified R. palustris proteins in the LC-MS/MS experiment, the generalized G-test detected 1119 differentially expressed proteins under six growth conditions. Finally, we studied correlated expression of these 1119 proteins by analyzing pairwise expression correlations and by delineating protein clusters according to expression patterns. Through pairwise expression correlation analysis, we demonstrated that proteins co-located in the same operon were much more strongly coexpressed than those from different operons. Combining cluster analysis with existing protein functional annotations, we identified six protein clusters with known biological significance. In summary, the proposed generalized G-test using spectral count sampling statistics is a viable methodology for robust quantification of relative protein abundance and for sensitive detection of biologically significant differential protein expression under multiple experimental conditions in label-free shotgun proteomics.     

Platform-independent and label-free quantitation of proteomic data using MS1 extracted ion chromatograms in skyline: application to protein acetylation and phosphorylation

Despite advances in metabolic and postmetabolic labeling methods for quantitative proteomics, there remains a need for improved label-free approaches. This need is particularly pressing for workflows that incorporate affinity enrichment at the peptide level, where isobaric chemical labels such as isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation and tandem mass tags may prove problematic or where stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture labeling cannot be readily applied. Skyline is a freely available, open source software tool for quantitative data processing and proteomic analysis. We expanded the capabilities of Skyline to process ion intensity chromatograms of peptide analytes from full scan mass spectral data (MS1) acquired during HPLC MS/MS proteomic experiments. Moreover, unlike existing programs, Skyline MS1 filtering can be used with mass spectrometers from four major vendors, which allows results to be compared directly across laboratories. The new quantitative and graphical tools now available in Skyline specifically support interrogation of multiple acquisitions for MS1 filtering, including visual inspection of peak picking and both automated and manual integration, key features often lacking in existing software. In addition, Skyline MS1 filtering displays retention time indicators from underlying MS/MS data contained within the spectral library to ensure proper peak selection. The modular structure of Skyline also provides well defined, customizable data reports and thus allows users to directly connect to existing statistical programs for post hoc data analysis. To demonstrate the utility of the MS1 filtering approach, we have carried out experiments on several MS platforms and have specifically examined the performance of this method to quantify two important post-translational modifications: acetylation and phosphorylation, in peptide-centric affinity workflows of increasing complexity using mouse and human models.     

Label-free quantitative analysis of one-dimensional PAGE LC/MS/MS proteome: application on angiotensin II-stimulated smooth muscle cells secretome

A widely used method for protein identification couples prefractionation of protein samples by one-dimensional (1D) PAGE with LC/MS/MS. We developed a new label-free quantitative algorithm by combining measurements of spectral counting, ion intensity, and peak area on 1D PAGE-based proteomics. This algorithm has several improvements over other label-free quantitative algorithms: (i) Errors in peak detection are reduced because the retention time is based on each LC/MS/MS run and actual precursor m/z. (ii) Detection sensitivity is increased because protein quantification is based on the combination of peptide count, ion intensity, and peak area. (iii) Peak intensity and peak area are calculated in each LC/MS/MS run for all slices from 1D PAGE for every single identified protein and visualized as a Western blot image. The sensitivity and accuracy of this algorithm were demonstrated by using standard curves (17.4 fmol to 8.7 pmol), complex protein mixtures (30 fmol to 1.16 pmol) of known composition, and spiked protein (34.8 fmol to 17.4 pmol) in complex proteins. We studied the feasibility of this approach using the secretome of angiotensin II (Ang II)-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). From the VSMC-conditioned medium, 629 proteins were identified including 212 putative secreted proteins. 26 proteins were differently expressed in control and Ang II-stimulated VSMCs, including 18 proteins not previously reported. Proteins related to cell growth (CYR61, protein NOV, and clusterin) were increased, whereas growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6) and growth/differentiation factor 6 were decreased by Ang II stimulation. Ang II-stimulated changes of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, GAS6, cathepsin B, and periostin were validated by Western blot. In conclusion, a novel label-free quantitative analysis of 1D PAGE-LC/MS/MS-based proteomics has been successfully applied to the identification of new potential mediators of Ang II action and may provide an alternative to traditional protein staining methods.     

Modeling contaminants in AP-MS/MS experiments

Identification of protein-protein interactions (PPI) by affinity purification (AP) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (AP-MS/MS) produces large data sets with high rates of false positives. This is in part because of contamination at the AP level (due to gel contamination, nonspecific binding to the TAP columns in the context of tandem affinity purification, insufficient purification, etc.). In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian approach to identify false-positive PPIs involving contaminants in AP-MS/MS experiments. Specifically, we propose a confidence assessment algorithm (called Decontaminator) that builds a model of contaminants using a small number of representative control experiments. It then uses this model to determine whether the Mascot score of a putative prey is significantly larger than what was observed in control experiments and assigns it a p-value and a false discovery rate. We show that our method identifies contaminants better than previously used approaches and results in a set of PPIs with a larger overlap with databases of known PPIs. Our approach will thus allow improved accuracy in PPI identification while reducing the number of control experiments required.     

ROCS: A reproducibility index and confidence score for interaction proteomics

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Affinity-Purification Mass-Spectrometry (AP-MS) provides a powerful means of identifyingprotein complexes and interactions. Several important challenges exist in interpreting theresults of AP-MS experiments. First, the reproducibility of AP-MS experimental replicatescan be low, due both to technical variability and the dynamic nature of protein interactions inthe cell. Second, the identification of true protein-protein interactions in AP-MS experimentsis subject to inaccuracy due to high false negative and false positive rates. Severalexperimental approaches can be used to mitigate these drawbacks, including the use ofreplicated and control experiments and relative quantification to sensitively distinguish trueinteracting proteins from false ones. RESULTS: To address the issues of reproducibility and accuracy of protein-protein interactions, weintroduce a two-step method, called ROCS, which makes use of Indicator Proteins to selectreproducible AP-MS experiments, and of Confidence Scores to select specific protein-proteininteractions. The Indicator Proteins account for measures of protein identification as well asprotein reproducibility, effectively allowing removal of outlier experiments that contributenoise and affect downstream inferences. The filtered set of experiments is then used in theProtein-Protein Interaction (PPI) scoring step. Prey protein scoring is done by computing aConfidence Score, which accounts for the probability of occurrence of prey proteins in thebait experiments relative to the control experiment, where the significance cutoff parameter isestimated by simultaneously controlling false positives and false negatives against metrics offalse discovery rate and biological coherence respectively. In summary, the ROCS methodrelies on automatic objective criterions for parameter estimation and error-controlledprocedures. We illustrate the performance of our method by applying it to five previously published AP-MS experiments, each containing well characterized protein interactions,allowing for systematic benchmarking of ROCS. We show that our method may be used onits own to make accurate identification of specific, biologically relevant protein-proteininteractions or in combination with other AP-MS scoring methods to significantly improveinferences. CONCLUSIONS: Our method addresses important issues encountered in AP-MS datasets, making ROCS a verypromising tool for this purpose, either on its own or especially in conjunction with othermethods. We anticipate that our methodology may be used more generally in proteomicsstudies and databases, where experimental reproducibility issues arise. The method isimplemented in the R language, and is available as an R package called "ROCS", freelyavailable from the CRAN repository http://cran.r-project.org/.     

Computational framework for analysis of prey-prey associations in interaction proteomics identifies novel human protein-protein interactions and networks

Large-scale protein-protein interaction data sets have been generated for several species including yeast and human and have enabled the identification, quantification, and prediction of cellular molecular networks. Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is the preeminent methodology for large-scale analysis of protein complexes, performed by immunopurifying a specific "bait" protein and its associated "prey" proteins. The analysis and interpretation of AP-MS data sets is, however, not straightforward. In addition, although yeast AP-MS data sets are relatively comprehensive, current human AP-MS data sets only sparsely cover the human interactome. Here we develop a framework for analysis of AP-MS data sets that addresses the issues of noise, missing data, and sparsity of coverage in the context of a current, real world human AP-MS data set. Our goal is to extend and increase the density of the known human interactome by integrating bait-prey and cocomplexed preys (prey-prey associations) into networks. Our framework incorporates a score for each identified protein, as well as elements of signal processing to improve the confidence of identified protein-protein interactions. We identify many protein networks enriched in known biological processes and functions. In addition, we show that integrated bait-prey and prey-prey interactions can be used to refine network topology and extend known protein networks.     

Reinvestigation of Aminoacyl-TRNA Synthetase Core Complex by Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry Reveals TARSL2 as a Potential Member of the Complex

Twenty different aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) link each amino acid to their cognate tRNAs. Individual ARSs are also associated with various non-canonical activities involved in neuronal diseases, cancer and autoimmune diseases. Among them, eight ARSs (D, EP, I, K, L, M, Q and RARS), together with three ARS-interacting multifunctional proteins (AIMPs), are currently known to assemble the multi-synthetase complex (MSC). However, the cellular function and global topology of MSC remain unclear. In order to understand the complex interaction within MSC, we conducted affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) using each of AIMP1, AIMP2 and KARS as a bait protein. Mass spectrometric data were funneled into SAINT software to distinguish true interactions from background contaminants. A total of 40, 134, 101 proteins in each bait scored over 0.9 of SAINT probability in HEK 293T cells. Complex-forming ARSs, such as DARS, EPRS, IARS, Kars, LARS, MARS, QARS and RARS, were constantly found to interact with each bait. Variants such as, AIMP2-DX2 and AIMP1 isoform 2 were found with specific peptides in KARS precipitates. Relative enrichment analysis of the mass spectrometric data demonstrated that TARSL2 (threonyl-tRNA synthetase like-2) was highly enriched with the ARS-core complex. The interaction was further confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation of TARSL2 with other ARS core-complex components. We suggest TARSL2 as a new component of ARS core-complex.     

Label-free detection of differential protein expression by LC/MALDI mass spectrometry

Protein abundance changes during disease or experimental perturbation are increasingly analyzed by label-free LC/MS approaches. Here we demonstrate the use of LC/MALDI MS for label-free detection of protein expression differences using Escherichia coli cultures grown on arabinose, fructose or glucose as a carbon source. The advantages of MALDI, such as detection of only singly charged ions, and MALDI plate archiving to facilitate retrospective MS/MS data collection are illustrated. MALDI spectra from RP chromatography of tryptic digests of the E. coli lysates were aligned and quantitated using the Rosetta Elucidator system. Approximately 5000 peptide signals were detected in all LC/MALDI runs spanning over 3 orders of magnitude of signal intensity. The average coefficients of variation for all signals across the entire intensity range in all technical replicates were found to be <25%. Pearson correlation coefficients from 0.93 to 0.98 for pairwise comparisons illustrate high replicate reproducibility. Expression differences determined by Analysis of Variance highlighted over 500 isotope clusters ( p < 0.01), which represented candidates for targeted peptide identification using MS/MS. Biologically interpretable protein identifications that could be derived underpin the general utility of this label-free LC/MALDI strategy.     

Computational and informatics strategies for identification of specific protein interaction partners in affinity purification mass spectrometry experiments

Analysis of protein interaction networks and protein complexes using affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP/MS) is among most commonly used and successful applications of proteomics technologies. One of the foremost challenges of AP/MS data is a large number of false-positive protein interactions present in unfiltered data sets. Here we review computational and informatics strategies for detecting specific protein interaction partners in AP/MS experiments, with a focus on incomplete (as opposite to genome wide) interactome mapping studies. These strategies range from standard statistical approaches, to empirical scoring schemes optimized for a particular type of data, to advanced computational frameworks. The common denominator among these methods is the use of label-free quantitative information such as spectral counts or integrated peptide intensities that can be extracted from AP/MS data. We also discuss related issues such as combining multiple biological or technical replicates, and dealing with data generated using different tagging strategies. Computational approaches for benchmarking of scoring methods are discussed, and the need for generation of reference AP/MS data sets is highlighted. Finally, we discuss the possibility of more extended modeling of experimental AP/MS data, including integration with external information such as protein interaction predictions based on functional genomics data.     

Highly reproducible label free quantitative proteomic analysis of RNA polymerase complexes

The use of quantitative proteomics methods to study protein complexes has the potential to provide in-depth information on the abundance of different protein components as well as their modification state in various cellular conditions. To interrogate protein complex quantitation using shotgun proteomic methods, we have focused on the analysis of protein complexes using label-free multidimensional protein identification technology and studied the reproducibility of biological replicates. For these studies, we focused on three highly related and essential multi-protein enzymes, RNA polymerase I, II, and III from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that label-free quantitation using spectral counting is highly reproducible at the protein and peptide level when analyzing RNA polymerase I, II, and III. In addition, we show that peptide sampling does not follow a random sampling model, and we show the need for advanced computational models to predict peptide detection probabilities. In order to address these issues, we used the APEX protocol to model the expected peptide detectability based on whole cell lysate acquired using the same multidimensional protein identification technology analysis used for the protein complexes. Neither method was able to predict the peptide sampling levels that we observed using replicate multidimensional protein identification technology analyses. In addition to the analysis of the RNA polymerase complexes, our analysis provides quantitative information about several RNAP associated proteins including the RNAPII elongation factor complexes DSIF and TFIIF. Our data shows that DSIF and TFIIF are the most highly enriched RNAP accessory factors in Rpb3-TAP purifications and demonstrate our ability to measure low level associated protein abundance across biological replicates. In addition, our quantitative data supports a model in which DSIF and TFIIF interact with RNAPII in a dynamic fashion in agreement with previously published reports.     

Abacus: a computational tool for extracting and pre-processing spectral count data for label-free quantitative proteomic analysis

We describe Abacus, a computational tool for extracting spectral counts from MS/MS data sets. The program aggregates data from multiple experiments, adjusts spectral counts to accurately account for peptides shared across multiple proteins, and performs common normalization steps. It can also output the spectral count data at the gene level, thus simplifying the integration and comparison between gene and protein expression data. Abacus is compatible with the widely used Trans-Proteomic Pipeline suite of tools and comes with a graphical user interface making it easy to interact with the program. The main aim of Abacus is to streamline the analysis of spectral count data by providing an automated, easy to use solution for extracting this information from proteomic data sets for subsequent, more sophisticated statistical analysis.     

Less label, more free: approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry

In this review we examine techniques, software, and statistical analyses used in label-free quantitative proteomics studies for area under the curve and spectral counting approaches. Recent advances in the field are discussed in an order that reflects a logical workflow design. Examples of studies that follow this design are presented to highlight the requirement for statistical assessment and further experiments to validate results from label-free quantitation. Limitations of label-free approaches are considered, label-free approaches are compared with labelling techniques, and forward-looking applications for label-free quantitative data are presented. We conclude that label-free quantitative proteomics is a reliable, versatile, and cost-effective alternative to labelled quantitation.     

Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics

Spectral counting has become a commonly used approach for measuring protein abundance in label-free shotgun proteomics. At the same time, the development of data analysis methods has lagged behind. Currently most studies utilizing spectral counts rely on simple data transforms and posthoc corrections of conventional signal-to-noise ratio statistics. However, these adjustments can neither handle the bias toward high abundance proteins nor deal with the drawbacks due to the limited number of replicates. We present a novel statistical framework (QSpec) for the significance analysis of differential expression with extensions to a variety of experimental design factors and adjustments for protein properties. Using synthetic and real experimental data sets, we show that the proposed method outperforms conventional statistical methods that search for differential expression for individual proteins. We illustrate the flexibility of the model by analyzing a data set with a complicated experimental design involving cellular localization and time course.     

Endogenous epitope tagging of heat shock protein 70 isoform Hsc70 using CRISPR/Cas9

Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) is an evolutionarily well-conserved molecular chaperone involved in several cellular processes such as folding of proteins, modulating protein-protein interactions, and transport of proteins across the membrane. Binding partners of Hsp70 (known as “clients”) are identified on an individual basis as researchers discover their particular protein of interest binds to Hsp70. A full complement of Hsp70 interactors under multiple stress conditions remains to be determined. A promising approach to characterizing the Hsp70 “interactome” is the use of protein epitope tagging and then affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (AP-MS/MS). AP-MS analysis is a widely used method to decipher protein-protein interaction networks and identifying protein functions. Conventionally, the proteins are overexpressed ectopically which interferes with protein complex stoichiometry, skewing AP-MS/MS data. In an attempt to solve this issue, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing to integrate a tandem-affinity (TAP) epitope tag into the genomic locus of HSC70. This system offers several benefits over existing expression systems including native expression, no requirement for selection, and homogeneity between cells. This cell line, freely available to chaperone researchers, will aid in small and large-scale protein interaction studies as well as the study of biochemical activities and structure-function relationships of the Hsc70 protein.     

Accurate Protein Complex Retrieval by Affinity Enrichment Mass Spectrometry (AE-MS) Rather than Affinity Purification Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS)

Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to the understanding of biological processes. Affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is one of the most promising methods for their investigation. Previously, complexes were purified as much as possible, frequently followed by identification of individual gel bands. However, todays mass spectrometers are highly sensitive, and powerful quantitative proteomics strategies are available to distinguish true interactors from background binders. Here we describe a high performance affinity enrichment-mass spectrometry method for investigating protein–protein interactions, in which no attempt at purifying complexes to homogeneity is made. Instead, we developed analysis methods that take advantage of specific enrichment of interactors in the context of a large amount of unspecific background binders. We perform single-step affinity enrichment of endogenously expressed GFP-tagged proteins and their interactors in budding yeast, followed by single-run, intensity-based label-free quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis. Each pull-down contains around 2000 background binders, which are reinterpreted from troubling contaminants to crucial elements in a novel data analysis strategy. First the background serves for accurate normalization. Second, interacting proteins are not identified by comparison to a single untagged control strain, but instead to the other tagged strains. Third, potential interactors are further validated by their intensity profiles across all samples. We demonstrate the power of our AE-MS method using several well-known and challenging yeast complexes of various abundances. AE-MS is not only highly efficient and robust, but also cost effective, broadly applicable, and can be performed in any laboratory with access to high-resolution mass spectrometers.Protein–protein interactions are key to protein-mediated biological processes and influence all aspects of life. Therefore, considerable efforts have been dedicated to the mapping of protein–protein interactions. A classical experimental approach consists of co-immunoprecipitation of protein complexes combined with SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting to identify complex members. More recently, high-throughput techniques have been introduced; among these affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS)¹ (1–3) and the yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) approach (4–6) are the most prominent. AP-MS, in particular, has great potential for detecting functional interactions under near-physiological conditions, and has already been employed for interactome mapping in several organisms (7–15). Various AP-MS approaches have evolved over time, that differ in expression, tagging, and affinity purification of the bait protein; fractionation, LC-MS measurement, and quantification of the sample; and in data analysis. Recent progress in the AP-MS field has been driven by two factors: A new generation of mass spectrometers (16) providing higher sequencing speed, sensitivity, and mass accuracy, and the development of quantitative MS strategies.In the early days of AP-MS, tagged bait proteins were mostly overexpressed, enhancing their recovery in the pull-down. However, overexpression comes at the cost of obscuring the true situation in the cell, potentially leading to the detection of false interactions (17). Today, increased MS instrument power helps in the detection of bait proteins and interactors expressed at endogenous levels, augmenting the chances to detect functional interactions. In some simple organisms like yeast, genes of interest can directly be tagged in their genetic loci and expressed under their native promoter. In higher organisms, tagging proteins in their endogenous locus is more challenging, but also for mammalian cells, methods for close to endogenous expression are available. For instance, in controlled inducible expression systems, the concentration of the tagged bait protein can be titrated to close to endogenous levels (18). A very powerful approach is BAC transgenomics (19), as used in our QUBIC protocol (20), where a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) containing a tagged version of the gene of interest including all regulatory sequences and the natural promoter is stably transfected into a host cell line.The affinity purification step has also been subject to substantial changes over time. Previously, AP has been combined with nonquantitative MS as the readout, meaning all proteins identified by MS were considered potential interactors. Therefore, to reduce co-purifying “contaminants,” stringent two-step AP protocols using dual affinity tags like the TAP-tag (21) had to be employed. However, such stringent and multistep protocols can result in the loss of weak or transient interactors (3), whereas laborious and partially subjective filtering still has to be applied to clean up the list of identified proteins. The introduction of quantitative mass spectrometry (22–25) to the interactomics field about ten years ago was a paradigm shift, as it offered a proper way of dealing with unspecific binding and true interactors could be directly distinguished from background binders (26, 27). Importantly, quantification enables the detection of true interactors even under low-stringent conditions (28). In turn, this allowed the return to single-step AP protocols, which are milder and faster, and hence more suitable for detecting weak and transient interactors.Despite these advances, nonquantitative methods—often in combination with the TAP-tagging approach—are still popular and widely used, presumably because of reagent expenses and labeling protocols used in label-based approaches. However, there are ways to determine relative protein abundances in a label-free format. A simple, semiquantitative label-free way to estimate protein abundance is spectral counting (29). Another relative label-free quantification strategy is based on peptide intensities (30). In recent years high resolution MS has become much more widely accessible and there has been great progress in intensity-based label-free quantification (LFQ) approaches. Together with development of sophisticated LFQ algorithms, this has boosted obtainable accuracy. Intensity-based LFQ now offers a viable and cost-effective alternative to label-based methods in most applications (31). The potential of intensity-based LFQ approaches as tools for investigating protein–protein interactions has already been demonstrated by us (20, 32, 33) and others (34, 35). We have further refined intensity-based LFQ in the context of the MaxQuant framework (36) using sophisticated normalization algorithms, achieving excellent accuracy and robustness of the measured “MaxLFQ” intensities (37).Another important advance in AP-MS, again enabled by increased MS instrument power, was the development of single-shot LC-MS methods with comprehensive coverage. Instead of extensive fractionation, which was previously needed to reduce sample complexity, nowadays even entire model proteomes can be measured in single LC-MS runs (38). The protein mixture resulting from pull-downs is naturally of lower complexity compared with the entire proteome. Therefore, modern MS obviates the need for gel-based (or other) fractionation and samples can be analyzed in single runs. Apart from avoiding selection of gel bands by visual examination, this has many advantages, including decreased sample preparation and measurement time, increased sensitivity, and higher quantitative accuracy in a label-free format.In this work, we build on many of the recent advances in the field to establish a state of the art LFQ AE-MS method. Based on our previous QUBIC pipeline (20), we developed an approach for investigating protein–protein interactions, which we exemplify in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We extended the data analysis pipeline to extract the wealth of information contained in the LFQ data, by establishing a novel concept that specifically makes use of the signature of background binders instead of eliminating them from the data set. The large amount of unspecific binders detected in our experiments rendered the use of a classic untagged control strain unnecessary and enabled comparing to a control group consisting of many unrelated pull-downs instead. Our protocol is generic, practical, and fast, uses low input amounts, and identifies interactors with high confidence. We propose that single-step pull-down experiments, especially when coupled to high-sensitivity MS, should now be regarded as affinity enrichment rather than affinity purification methods.     

Comparative evaluation of label-free SINQ normalized spectral index quantitation in the central proteomics facilities pipeline

Normalized spectral index quantification was recently presented as an accurate method of label‐free quantitation, which improved spectral counting by incorporating the intensities of peptide MS/MS fragment ions into the calculation of protein abundance. We present SINQ, a tool implementing this method within the framework of existing analysis software, our freely available central proteomics facilities pipeline (CPFP). We demonstrate, using data sets of protein standards acquired on a variety of mass spectrometers, that SINQ can rapidly provide useful estimates of the absolute quantity of proteins present in a medium‐complexity sample. In addition, relative quantitation of standard proteins spiked into a complex lysate background and run without pre‐fractionation produces accurate results at amounts above 1 fmol on column. We compare quantitation performance to various precursor intensity‐ and identification‐based methods, including the normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF), exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI), MaxQuant, and Progenesis LC‐MS. We anticipate that the SINQ tool will be a useful asset for core facilities and individual laboratories that wish to produce quantitative MS data, but lack the necessary manpower to routinely support more complicated software workflows. SINQ is freely available to obtain and use as part of the central proteomics facilities pipeline, which is released under an open‐source license.