Autogenous control: ribosomal protein L10-L12 complex binds to the leader sequence of its mRNA

Ribosomal proteins L10 and L12 are encoded in the L10 operon, situated at position 89.5 min on the Escherichia coli genetic map, and are able to regulate their own translation. The two proteins form a L10-L12 complex that is able to bind specifically to the leader sequence of the L10 operon mRNA and prevent translation. We show that the leader sequence: (i) is required for the translation of mRNA into L10 and L12 proteins; and (ii) contains a unique binding site for the inhibitory L10-L12 complex. We suggest that a specific secondary structure of the leader RNA is required for translation. When this structure is perturbed by L10-L12 binding, by deletion, or point mutations, translation is inhibited. The block on the synthesis of L10 and L12 can presumably be removed by the incorporation of the inhibitory L10-L12 complex into assembling 50S ribosome subunits. We observed that rRNA prevents the binding of L10-L12 to the mRNA. Furthermore, we have identified extended sequence homologies within the 23S rRNA and L10 leader region RNA. The L10-L12 binding site on the mRNA includes part of the homologous sequences.     

Specific interactions of the L10(L12)4 ribosomal protein complex with mRNA, rRNA, and L11

Large ribosomal subunit proteins L10 and L12 form a pentameric protein complex, L10(L12) 4, that is intimately involved in the ribosome elongation cycle. Its contacts with rRNA or other ribosomal proteins have been only partially resolved by crystallography. In Escherichia coli, L10 and L12 are encoded from a single operon for which L10(L12) 4 is a translational repressor that recognizes a secondary structure in the mRNA leader. In this study, L10(L12) 4 was expressed from the moderate thermophile Bacillus stearothermophilus to quantitatively compare strategies for binding of the complex to mRNA and ribosome targets. The minimal mRNA recognition structure is widely distributed among bacteria and has the potential to form a kink-turn structure similar to one identified in the rRNA as part of the L10(L12) 4 binding site. Mutations in equivalent positions between the two sequences have similar effects on L10(L12) 4-RNA binding affinity and identify the kink-turn motif and a loop AA sequence as important recognition elements. In contrast to the larger rRNA structure, the mRNA apparently positions the kink-turn motif and loop for protein recognition without the benefit of Mg (2+)-dependent tertiary structure. The mRNA and rRNA fragments bind L10(L12) 4 with similar affinity ( approximately 10 (8) M (-1)), but fluorescence binding studies show that a nearby protein in the ribosome, L11, enhances L10(L12) 4 binding approximately 100-fold. Thus, mRNA and ribosome targets use similar RNA features, held in different structural contexts, to recognize L10(L12) 4, and the ribosome ensures the saturation of its L10(L12) 4 binding site by means of an additional protein-protein interaction.     

Translational regulation of the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: mutations that define the target site for repression by L1.

The L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes for L11 and L1 and is feedback regulated by the translational repressor L1. The mRNA target site for this repression is located close to the Shine-Dalgarno sequence for the first cistron, rp1K (L11). By use of a random mutagenesis procedure we have isolated and characterized a series of point mutations in the L11 leader mRNA which eliminate or greatly diminish the regulation by L1. The mutations define a region essential for translational regulation upstream of the L11 Shine-Dalgarno sequence and identify a region of structural homology with the L1 binding site on 23S rRNA. These results are also consistent with the previously proposed model for the secondary structure of the L11 leader mRNA.     

rRNA binding domain of yeast ribosomal protein L25. Identification of its borders and a key leucine residue

We have delineated the region of yeast ribosomal protein L25 responsible for its specific binding to 26 S rRNA by a novel approach using in vitro synthesized, [35S]methionine-labeled fragments as well as point mutants of the L25 protein. The rRNA binding capacity of these mutant polypeptides was tested by incubation with an in vitro transcribed, biotinylated fragment of yeast 26 S rRNA that contains the complete L25 binding site. Protein-rRNA interaction was assayed by binding of the rRNA-r-protein complex to streptavidin-agarose followed either by analysis of the bound polypeptide by SDS/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis or by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid. Our results show that the structural elements necessary and sufficient for specific interaction of L25 with 26 S rRNA are contained in the region bordered by amino acids 62 and 126. The remaining parts of the protein, in particular the C-terminal 16 residues, while not essential for binding, do enhance its affinity for 26 S rRNA. To test whether, as suggested by the results of the deletion experiments, the evolutionarily conserved sequence motif K120KAYVRL126 is involved in rRNA binding, we replaced the leucine residue at position 126 by either isoleucine or lysine. The first substitution did not affect binding. The second, however, completely abolished the specific rRNA binding capacity of the protein. Thus, Leu126, and possibly the whole conserved sequence motif, plays a key role in binding of L25 to 26 S rRNA.     

Mutational analysis of the L1 binding site of 23S rRNA in Escherichia coli.

The L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes for L11 and L1 and is feedback regulated by the translational repressor L1. Both the L1 binding site on 23S rRNA and the L1 repressor target site on L11 operon mRNA share similar proposed secondary structures and contain some primary sequence identity. Several site-directed mutations in the binding region of 23S rRNA were constructed and their effects on binding were examined. For in vitro analysis, a filter binding method was used. For in vivo analysis, a conditional expression system was used to overproduce a 23S rRNA fragment containing the L1 binding region, which leads to specific derepression of the synthesis of L11 and L1. Changes in the shared region of the 23S rRNA L1 binding site produced effects on L1 binding similar to those found previously in analysis of corresponding changes in the L11 operon mRNA target site. The results support the hypothesis that r-protein L1 interacts with both 23S rRNA and L11 operon mRNA by recognizing similar features on both RNAs.