Three-dimensional structure of the insect (Lethocerus) flight muscle M-band

The oval myosin filament profiles in transverse sections through the M-band of Lethocerus flight muscle are arranged in one of three orientations 60 degrees apart and point along the 11 directions of the hexagonal filament lattice. Relative orientations are not systematically related to give a superlattice structure, but neither are the orientations arranged completely randomly. In fact there is a nearly random structure with a slight bias towards adjacent filaments being identically oriented. This form of M-band structure is explained in terms of interactions between quasi-equivalent M-bridges. Its implications with regard to myosin crossbridge arrangement depend on the rotational symmetry of the crossbridge helix. For 6-stranded helices, 60 degrees rotations have no noticeable effect. However, in the case of the more likely 4-stranded structure, our results show that the crossbridge origins in the insect flight muscle A-band would be highly disordered. This disorder must be accounted for in interpreting both the flared-X crossbridge interactions seen in transverse sections of rigor insect flight muscle and the beautiful X-ray diffraction patterns from the same preparation. It is likely that in rigor insect muscle, some flared-Xs have the two heads of single myosin molecules interacting with two different actin filaments, whereas other flared-Xs have both of the myosin heads in one molecule interacting with the same actin filament.     

Three-Dimensional Structure of the M-region (Bare Zone) of Vertebrate Striated Muscle Myosin Filaments by Single-Particle Analysis

The rods of anti-parallel myosin molecules overlap at the centre of bipolar myosin filaments to produce an M-region (bare zone) that is free of myosin heads. Beyond the M-region edges, myosin molecules aggregate in a parallel fashion to yield the bridge regions of the myosin filaments. Adjacent myosin filaments in striated muscle A-bands are cross-linked by the M-band. Vertebrate striated muscle myosin filaments have a 3-fold rotational symmetry around their long axes. In addition, at the centre of the M-region, there are three 2-fold axes perpendicular to the filament long axis, giving the whole filament dihedral 32-point group symmetry. Here we describe the three-dimensional structure obtained by a single-particle analysis of the M-region of myosin filaments from goldfish skeletal muscle under relaxing conditions and as viewed in negative stain. This is the first single-particle reconstruction of isolated M-regions. The resulting three-dimensional reconstruction reveals details to about 55 Å resolution of the density distribution in the five main nonmyosin densities in the M-band (M6′, M4′, M1, M4 and M6) and in the myosin head crowns (P1, P2 and P3) at the M-region edges. The outermost crowns in the reconstruction were identified specifically by their close similarity to the corresponding crown levels in our previously published bridge region reconstructions. The packing of myosin molecules into the M-region structure is discussed, and some unidentified densities are highlighted.     

The myosin filament XIV backbone structure.

The substructure of the thick filaments of chemically skinned chicken pectoralis muscle was investigated by electron microscopy. Images of transverse sections of the myosin filaments were determined to have threefold symmetry by cross-correlation analysis, which gives an unbiased determination of the rotational symmetry of the images. Resolution, using the phase residual test (Frank et al. 1981. Science [Wash. DC]. 214:1353-1355), was found to be between 3.2 and 3.6 nm. Three arrangements of nine subfilaments in the backbone were found in all regions of the filament at ionic strengths of 20 and 200 mM. In the average images of two of these, there were three dense central subfilaments and three pairs of subfilaments on the surface of the thick filament. In the average image of the third arrangement, all of the protein mass of the nine subfilaments was on the surface of the filament with three of them showing less variation in position than the others. A fourth arrangement appearing to be transitional between two of these was seen often at 200 mM ionic strength and only rarely at 20 mM. On average, the myosin subfilaments were parallel to the long axis of the filament. The different arrangements of subfilaments appear to be randomly distributed among the filaments in a transverse section of the A-band. Relative rotational orientations with respect to the hexagonal filament lattice, using the three densest subfilaments as reference showed a major clustering (32%) of filaments within one 10 degrees spread, a lesser clustering (15%) at 90 degrees to the first, and the remainder scattered thinly over the rest of the 120 degrees range. There was no obvious pattern of distribution of the two predominant orientations that could define a superlattice in the filament lattice.     

The myosin filament superlattice in the flight muscles of flies: A-band lattice optimisation for stretch-activation?

Low-angle X-ray diffraction patterns from relaxed fruitfly (Drosophila) flight muscle recorded on the BioCat beamline at the Argonne Advanced Photon Source (APS) show many features similar to such patterns from the "classic" insect flight muscle in Lethocerus, the giant water bug, but there is a characteristically different pattern of sampling of the myosin filament layer-lines, which indicates the presence of a superlattice of myosin filaments in the Drosophila A-band. We show from analysis of the structure factor for this lattice that the sampling pattern is exactly as expected if adjacent four-stranded myosin filaments, of repeat 116 nm, are axially shifted in the hexagonal A-band lattice by one-third of the 14.5 nm axial spacing between crowns of myosin heads. In addition, electron micrographs of Drosophila and other flies (e.g. the house fly (Musca) and the flesh fly (Sarcophaga)) combined with image processing confirm that the same A-band superlattice occurs in all of these flies; it may be a general property of the Diptera. The different A-band organisation in flies compared with Lethocerus, which operates at a much lower wing beat frequency (approximately 30 Hz) and requires a warm-up period, may be a way of optimising the myosin and actin filament geometry needed both for stretch activation at the higher wing beat frequencies (50 Hz to 1000 Hz) of flies and their need for a rapid escape response.     

Application of potential energy calculations to the determination of muscle structure from X-ray data with special reference to the configuration of myosin heads

A method that relates molecular structure to the forces that maintain it and to its X-ray diffraction pattern is described and applied to muscle. In a computer model, the potential energy of the moveable components (here the myosin heads) is minimized by letting them move down the steepest gradient in three dimensions from a variety of starting positions. Initial values are assumed for the parameters that determine the forces, and for those that define the structure and arrangement of the fixed components. The X-ray pattern expected from the resulting structures can be calculated in a straightforward manner and compared with relevant observed data. Discrepancies can then be minimized by varying the values initially assumed for the parameters, as in the conventional “trial and error” method.This first application of the present method is concerned with the effects of the hexagonal lattice on the myosin head configuration in thick filaments of the type found in vertebrate skeletal muscle. For that purpose, a very simple model was used with the following main features: smooth cylinders for the thin filaments and for the thick filament backbones, two spherical heads attached by Hookean springs to each point of a $\text{9}\text{3}$ helix on the surface of the backbone, and repulsive forces of the electrostatic double-layer type acting between each head and all other surfaces.The myosin head configuration was calculated for an isolated thick filament and a study was made of the effects of packing such filaments into a hexagonal lattice of various side spacings in the presence or absence of thin filaments. For the isolated filament, it was found that the $\text{9}\text{3}$ helical symmetry is maintained in the myosin head configuration and that the two heads of each molecule are splayed azimuthally. When such filaments are packed into the hexagonal lattice with thin filaments present, the $\text{9}\text{3}$ helical symmetry of the myosin head configuration is lost. As the lattice side spacing is reduced, the myosin heads become increasingly displaced not only in the radial and azimuthal directions but also in the axial direction, although they interact primarily with smooth cylinders. The axial separation of the two heads in each molecule becomes different in one level from that in the other two in the 43 nm axial repeat, thus increasing the repeat in projection onto the axis from 14.3 to 43 nm. This effect may contribute to the “forbidden meridionals” described by Huxley & Brown (1967). In the absence of thin filaments, the displacements of the myosin heads are much smaller, even when the lattice side spacing is reduced to that present in muscles stretched to non-overlap.Applying the method based on potential energy minimization to the evaluation of X-ray data from muscles in hypertonic Ringer reveals that, even in the case of patterns apparently free of lattice sampling (and thus normally considered to represent diffraction from single filaments), the interpretation must include the nearest myosin heads from neighbouring filaments, and that this may be necessary also for unsampled patterns obtained from muscles in normal Ringer. Furthermore, the method helps to explain several other major features of X-ray results obtained from muscles in the hypertonic state and from muscles stretched in normal Ringer to long sarcomere lengths including non-overlap. It is concluded that the method provides a powerful tool for the interpretation of muscle X-ray patterns.     

Axial arrangement of the myosin rod in vertebrate thick filaments: immunoelectron microscopy with a monoclonal antibody to light meromyosin

A monoclonal antibody, MF20, which has been shown previously to bind the myosin heavy chain of vertebrate striated muscle, has been proven to bind the light meromyosin (LMM) fragment by solid phase radioimmune assay with alpha-chymotryptic digests of purified myosin. Epitope mapping by electron microscopy of rotary-shadowed, myosin-antibody complexes has localized the antibody binding site to LMM at a point approximately 92 nm from the C-terminus of the myosin heavy chain. Since this epitope in native thick filaments is accessible to monoclonal antibodies, we used this antibody as a high affinity ligand to analyze the packing of LMM along the backbone of the thick filament. By immunofluorescence microscopy, MF20 was shown to bind along the entire A-band of chicken pectoralis myofibrils, although the epitope accessibility was greater near the ends than at the center of the A-bands. Thin-section, transmission electron microscopy of myofibrils decorated with MF20 revealed 50 regularly spaced, cross-striations in each half A-band, with a repeat distance of approximately 13 nm. These were numbered consecutively, 1-50, from the A-band to the last stripe, approximately 68 nm from the filament tips. These same striations could be visualized by negative staining of native thick filaments labeled with MF20. All 50 striations were of a consecutive, uninterrupted repeat which approximated the 14-15-nm axial translation of cross-bridges. Each half M-region contained five MF20 striations (approximately 13 nm apart) with a distance between stripes 1 and 1', on each half of the bare zone, of approximately 18 nm. This is compatible with a packing model with full, antiparallel overlap of the myosin rods in the bare zone region. Differences in the spacings measured with negatively stained myofilaments and thin-sectioned myofibrils have been shown to arise from specimen shrinkage in the fixed and embedded preparations. These observations provide strong support for Huxley's original proposal for myosin packing in thick filaments of vertebrate muscle (Huxley, H. E., 1963, J. Mol. Biol., 7:281-308) and, for the first time, directly demonstrate that the 14-15-nm axial translation of LMM in the thick filament backbone corresponds to the cross-bridge repeat detected with x-ray diffraction of living muscle.     

3D structure of relaxed fish muscle myosin filaments by single particle analysis

To understand the structural changes involved in the force-producing myosin cross-bridge cycle in vertebrate muscle it is necessary to know the arrangement and conformation of the myosin heads at the start of the cycle (i.e. the relaxed state). Myosin filaments isolated from goldfish muscle under relaxing conditions and viewed in negative stain by electron microscopy (EM) were divided into segments and subjected to three-dimensional (3D) single particle analysis without imposing helical symmetry. This allowed the known systematic departure from helicity characteristic of vertebrate striated muscle myosin filaments to be preserved and visualised. The resulting 3D reconstruction reveals details to about 55 A resolution of the myosin head density distribution in the three non-equivalent head 'crowns' in the 429 A myosin filament repeat. The analysis maintained the well-documented axial perturbations of the myosin head crowns and revealed substantial azimuthal perturbations between crowns with relatively little radial perturbation. Azimuthal rotations between crowns were approximately 60 degrees , 60 degrees and 0 degrees , rather than the regular 40 degrees characteristic of an unperturbed helix. The new density map correlates quite well with the head conformations analysed in other EM studies and in the relaxed fish muscle myosin filament structure modelled from X-ray fibre diffraction data. The reconstruction provides information on the polarity of the myosin head array in the A-band, important in understanding the geometry of the myosin head interaction with actin during the cross-bridge cycle, and supports a number of conclusions previously inferred by other methods. The observed azimuthal head perturbations are consistent with the X-ray modelling results from intact muscle, indicating that the observed perturbations are an intrinsic property of the myosin filaments and are not induced by the proximity of actin filaments in the muscle A-band lattice. Comparison of the axial density profile derived in this study with the axial density profile of the X-ray model of the fish myosin filaments which was restricted to contributions from the myosin heads allows the identification of a non-myosin density peak associated with the azimuthally perturbed head crown which can be interpreted as a possible location for C-protein or X-protein (MyBP-C or -X). This position for C-protein is also consistent with the C-zone interference function deduced from previous analysis of the meridional X-ray pattern from frog muscle. It appears that, along with other functions, C-(X-) protein may have the role of slewing the heads of one crown so that they do not clash with the neighbouring actin filaments, but are readily available to interact with actin when the muscle is activated.     

Different domains of the M-band protein myomesin are involved in myosin binding and M-band targeting

Myomesin is a 185-kDa protein located in the M-band of striated muscle where it interacts with myosin and titin, possibly connecting thick filaments with the third filament system. By using expression of epitope-tagged myomesin fragments in cultured cardiomyocytes and biochemical binding assays, we could demonstrate that the M-band targeting activity and the myosin-binding site are located in different domains of the molecule. An N-terminal immunoglobulin-like domain is sufficient for targeting to the M-band, but solid-phase overlay assays between individual N-terminal domains and the thick filament protein myosin revealed that the unique head domain contains the myosin-binding site. When expressed in cardiomyocytes, the head domains of rat and chicken myomesin showed species-specific differences in their incorporation pattern. The head domain of rat myomesin localized to a central area within the A-band, whereas the head domain of chicken myomesin was diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm. We therefore conclude that the head domain of myomesin binds to myosin but that this affinity is not sufficient for the restriction of the domain to the M-band in vivo. Instead, the neighboring immunoglobulin-like domain is essential for the precise incorporation of myomesin into the M-band, possibly because of interaction with a yet unknown protein of the sarcomere.     

The myosin filament. X. Observation of nine subfilaments in transverse sections

The molecular packing of the subfilaments in muscle thick filaments has been investigated by electron microscopy. Thin (80-100 nm) transverse sections of vertebrate skeletal muscle were cut, and 129 electron microscope images of thick filaments from 15 different areas including seven to ten images in each area were analyzed by computer image processing. The transverse sections were limited to the portion of the filaments between the bare zone and the C-protein bearing region. Of the 129 images, six were discarded because they were structurally disrupted, 17 did not show evidence for the presence of subfilaments from the autocorrelation function, and four did not show evidence for three-fold rotational symmetry from the power spectrum. The remaining 102 filaments all showed evidence for three-fold rotational symmetry, consistent with other available evidence (Pepe, 1982). From the analysis of these images by rotational filtering, we have found that the vertebrate skeletal myosin filament is made up of nine subfilaments and that the image appears to have trigonal symmetry. Of these subfilaments, six are arranged with a center-to-center spacing of about 4 nm and the other three on the surface of the filament are distorted from this arrangement. Three additional densities, which together with the other nine, correspond to the pattern of 12 densities previously observed in more highly selected images (Stewart et al., 1981; Pepe and Drucker, 1972) were observed in 5% of the images. Another pattern of nine subfilaments peripherally arranged around the circumference of the filament was observed occasionally. This latter image may represent the organization of the subfilaments in the bare zone region of the filament, resulting from sampling of individual filaments displaced longitudinally relative to the other filaments in the A-band.     

3D Structure of fish muscle myosin filaments

Myosin filaments isolated from goldfish (Carassius auratus) muscle under relaxing conditions and viewed in negative stain by electron microscopy have been subjected to 3D helical reconstruction to provide details of the myosin head arrangement in relaxed muscle. Previous X-ray diffraction studies of fish muscle (plaice) myosin filaments have suggested that the heads project a long way from the filament surface rather than lying down flat and that heads in a single myosin molecule tend to interact with each other rather than with heads from adjacent molecules. Evidence has also been presented that the head tilt is away from the M-band. Here we seek to confirm these conclusions using a totally independent method. By using 3D helical reconstruction of isolated myosin filaments the known perturbation of the head array in vertebrate muscles was inevitably averaged out. The 3D reconstruction was therefore compared with the X-ray model after it too had been helically averaged. The resulting images showed the same characteristic features: heads projecting out from the filament backbone to high radius and the motor domains at higher radius and further away from the M-band than the light-chain-binding neck domains (lever arms) of the heads.     

Protein machines and self assembly in muscle organization.

The remarkable order of striated muscle is the result of a complex series of protein interactions at different levels of organization. Within muscle, the thick filament and its major protein myosin are classical examples of functioning protein machines. Our understanding of the structure and assembly of thick filaments and their organization into the regular arrays of the A-band has recently been enhanced by the application of biochemical, genetic, and structural approaches. Detailed studies of the thick filament backbone have shown that the myosins are organized into a tubular structure. Additional protein machines and specific myosin rod sequences have been identified that play significant roles in thick filament structure, assembly, and organization. These include intrinsic filament components, cross-linking molecules of the M-band and constituents of the membrane-cytoskeleton system. Muscle organization is directed by the multistep actions of protein machines that take advantage of well-established self-assembly relationships.     

General model of myosin filament structure. 3. Molecular packing arrangements in myosin filaments

Following the original proposals about myosin filament structure put forward as part of a general myosin filament model (Squire, 1971, 1972) it is here shown what the most likely molecular packing arrangements within the backbones of certain myosin filaments would be assuming that the model is correct. That this is so is already indicated by recently published experimental results which have confirmed several predictions of the model (Bullard and Reedy, 1972; Reedy et al., 1972; Tregear and Squire, 1973).The starting point in the analysis of the myosin packing arrangements is the model for the myosin ribbons in vertebrate smooth muscle proposed by Small &; Squire (1972). It is shown that there is only one reasonable type of packing arrangement for the rod portions of the myosin molecules which will account for the known structure of the ribbons and which is consistent with the known properties of myosin molecules. The dominant interactions in this packing scheme are between parallel myosin molecules which are related by axial shifts of 430 Å and 720 Å. In this analysis the myosin rods are treated as uniform rods of electron density and only the general features of two-strand coiled-coil molecules are considered.Since the general myosin filament model is based on the assumption that the structures of different types of myosin filament must be closely related, the packing scheme derived for the myosin ribbons is used to deduce the structures of the main parts (excluding the bare zones) of the myosin filaments in a variety of muscles. It is shown in each case that there is only one packing scheme consistent with all the available data on these filaments and that in each filament type exactly the same interactions between myosin rods are involved. In other words the myosin-myosin interactions involved in filament formation are specific, they involve molecular shifts of either 430 Å or 720 Å, and are virtually identical in all the different myosin filaments which have been considered. Apart from the myosin ribbons, these are the filaments in vertebrate skeletal muscle, insect flight muscle and certain molluscan muscles.In the case of the thick filaments in vertebrate skeletal muscle the form of the myosin packing arrangement in the bare zone is considered and a packing scheme proposed which involves antiparallel overlaps between myosin rods of 1300 Å and 430 Å. It is shown that this scheme readily explains the triangular profiles of the myosin filaments in the bare zone (Pepe, 1967, 1971) and many other observations on the form of these myosin filaments.Finally it is shown that the cores of several different myosin filaments, assuming they contain protein, may consist of different arrangements of one or other of two types of core subfilament.     

Native bare zone assemblage nucleates myosin filament assembly

Native myosin filaments from rabbit psoas muscle are always 1·5 μm long. The regulated assembly of these filaments is generally considered to occur by an initial antiparallel and subsequent parallel aggregation of identical myosin subunits. In this schema myosin filament length is controlled by either a self-assembly or a Vernier process. We present evidence which refines these ideas. Namely, that the intact myosin bare zone assemblage nucleates myosin filament assembly. This suggestion is based on the following experimental evidence. (1) A native bare zone assemblage about 0·3 μm long can be formed by dialysis of native myosin filaments to either a pH 8 or a 0·2 m-KCl solution. (2) Upon dialysis back to 0·1 m-KCl, bare zone assemblages and distal myosin molecules recombine to form 1·5 μm long bipolar filaments. (3) The bare zone assemblage can be separated from the distal myosin molecules by column chromatography in 0·2 m-KCl. Upon dialysis of the fractionated subsets back to 0.1 m-KCl, the bare zone assemblage retains its length of about 0·3 μm. However, the distal molecules reassemble to form filaments about 5 μm long. (4) Filaments are formed from mixes of the isolated subsets. The lengths of these filaments vary with the amount of distal myosin present. (5) When native filaments, isolated bare zone assemblages or distal myosin molecules are moved sequentially to 0·6 m-KCl and then to 0·1 m-KCl. the final filament lengths are all about 5 μm. The capacity of the bare zone assemblage to nucleate filament assembly may be due to the bare zone myosin molecules, the associated M band components or both.     

Titin organisation and the 3D architecture of the vertebrate-striated muscle I-band

The giant muscle protein titin (connectin) is known to serve as a cytoskeletal element in muscle sarcomeres. It elastically restrains lengthening sarcomeres, it aids the integrity and central positioning of the A-band in the sarcomere and it may act as a template upon which some sarcomeric components are laid down during myogenesis. A puzzle has been how titin molecules, arranged systematically within the hexagonal A-band lattice of myosin filaments, can redistribute through the I-band to their anchoring sites in the tetragonal Z-band lattice. Recent work by Liversage and colleagues has suggested that there are six titin molecules per half myosin filament. Since there are two actin filaments per half myosin filament in a half sarcomere, this means that there are three titin molecules interacting with each Z-band unit cell containing one actin filament in the same sarcomere and one of opposite polarity from the next sarcomere. Liversage et al. suggested that the three titins might be distributed with two on an actin filament of one polarity and one on the filament of opposite polarity. Here, we build on this suggestion and discuss the transition of titin from the A-band to the Z-band. We show that there are good structural and mechanical reasons why titin might be organised as Liversage et al., suggested and we discuss the possible relationships between A-band arrangements in successive sarcomeres along a myofibril.     

Oblique section 3-D reconstruction of relaxed insect flight muscle reveals the cross-bridge lattice in helical registration.

In this work we examined the arrangement of cross-bridges on the surface of myosin filaments in the A-band of Lethocerus flight muscle. Muscle fibers were fixed using the tannic-acid-uranyl-acetate, ("TAURAC") procedure. This new procedure provides remarkably good preservation of native features in relaxed insect flight muscle. We computed 3-D reconstructions from single images of oblique transverse sections. The reconstructions reveal a square profile of the averaged myosin filaments in cross section view, resulting from the symmetrical arrangement of four pairs of myosin heads in each 14.5-nm repeat along the filament. The square profiles form a very regular right-handed helical arrangement along the surface of the myosin filament. Furthermore, TAURAC fixation traps a near complete 38.7 nm labeling of the thin filaments in relaxed muscle marking the left-handed helix of actin targets surrounding the thick filaments. These features observed in an averaged reconstruction encompassing nearly an entire myofibril indicate that the myosin heads, even in relaxed muscle, are in excellent helical register in the A-band.     

A new muscle contractile system composed of a thick filament lattice and a single actin filament

To bridge the gap between the contractile system in muscle and in vitro motility assay, we have devised an A-band motility assay system. A glycerinated skeletal myofibril was treated with gelsolin to selectively remove the thin filaments and expose a single A-band. A single bead-tailed actin filament trapped by optical tweezers was made to interact with the inside or the outer surface of the A-band, and the displacement of the bead-tailed filament was measured in a physiological ionic condition by phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. We observed large back-and-forth displacement of the filament accompanied by a large change in developed force. Despite this large tension fluctuation, we found that the average force was proportional to the overlap inside and outside the A-band up to approximately 150 nm and 300 nm from the end of the A-band, respectively. Consistent with the difference in the density of myosin molecules, the average force per unit length of the overlap inside the A-band (the time-averaged force/myosin head was approximately 1 pN) was approximately twice as large as that outside. Thus, we conclude that the A-band motility assay system described here is suitable for studying force generation on a single actin filament, and its sliding movement within a regular three-dimensional thick filament lattice.     

Evolution of myosin filament arrangements in vertebrate skeletal muscle

A survey of skeletal muscles throughout craniates shows basic kinds of myosin filament arrangement, simple-lattice and superlattice, within the A-band of each sarcomere. Distribution of simple- and superlattice arrangements across a phylogeny of craniates suggests that the superlattice arrangement is primitive and that Amia and teleosts are derived in showing simple-lattice arrangements. Two taxa examined (Scyliorhinus and Acipenser) show both lattice types within the same organism implying that there is not a simple evolutionary transformation of one to the other fiber arrangement. We discuss the possible functional significance of the different lattice types. We believe that the crossbridges may have greater competition for actin binding sites in simple-lattice muscles compared to the superlattice types. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

DAAM Is Required for Thin Filament Formation and Sarcomerogenesis during Muscle Development in Drosophila

During muscle development, myosin and actin containing filaments assemble into the highly organized sarcomeric structure critical for muscle function. Although sarcomerogenesis clearly involves the de novo formation of actin filaments, this process remained poorly understood. Here we show that mouse and Drosophila members of the DAAM formin family are sarcomere-associated actin assembly factors enriched at the Z-disc and M-band. Analysis of dDAAM mutants revealed a pivotal role in myofibrillogenesis of larval somatic muscles, indirect flight muscles and the heart. We found that loss of dDAAM function results in multiple defects in sarcomere development including thin and thick filament disorganization, Z-disc and M-band formation, and a near complete absence of the myofibrillar lattice. Collectively, our data suggest that dDAAM is required for the initial assembly of thin filaments, and subsequently it promotes filament elongation by assembling short actin polymers that anneal to the pointed end of the growing filaments, and by antagonizing the capping protein Tropomodulin.