Evaluation of the Escherichia coli K12 inductest for detection of potential chemical carcinogens

46 chemicals of diverse classes and structures, including 30 known animal carcinogens, were evaluated for prophage-inducing ability using the Escherichia coli inductest with lysogenic strain GY5027 envA - uvrB- and indicator strain GY4015 ampR . The inductest detected 9 of 30 known carcinogens as genotoxic agents, including 3 polycyclic hydrocarbons, 2 aflatoxins, and 2 antitumor antimicrobials. Among the 21 carcinogens ineffective as prophage inducers were 3 aromatic amines (other than 2-aminoanthracene), 3 azo-aminoazo compounds, 2 methanesulfonates, and 2 nitro aromatics. In contrast, 18 and 17 of the 30 animal carcinogens were detected as genotoxic agents in the Salmonella/Ames test and E. coli WP2/ WP100 rec assay, respectively. The threshold sensitivity of the inductest was less than that of the Salmonella/Ames test for chemicals genotoxic in both tests. The ineffectiveness of the inductest as a routine test for detecting potential chemical carcinogens may be related to the nature of the DNA damage lesions formed by various genotoxic agents.     

The superiority of hamster liver microsomal fraction for activating nitrosamines to mutagens in Salmonella typhimurium

46 chemicals of various classes and structures, including 30 known animal carcinogens, were evaluated for genotoxic effects using the Escherichia coli rec assay with strains WP2 (wild-type) and WP100 (uvrA- recA-) in qualitative and quantitative spot tests and in quantitative suspension tests. The rec assay detected 17 of 30 known carcinogens as genotoxic agents, including mitomycin C and diethylnitrosamine, both negative in the Salmonella/Ames test as utilized in these studies. The rec assay in conjunction with the Salmonella/Ames test detected 20 of 30 known carcinogens as genotoxic agents. Azo/aminoazo carcinogens showed little gentoxicity, and the aromatic amine 2-acetylaminofluorene was non-genotoxic in the rec assay. The rec assay was more effective than pol tests with E. coli strains W3110/p3478 and strains WP2/WP67. Effectiveness of the rec assay was related to the DNA repair-defective nature of the uvrA- recA- genotype of strain WP100.     

Evaluation of the new system (umu-test) for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens

The umu operon in Escherichia coli is responsible for chemical and radiation mutagenesis, and the expression of the operon itself is inducible by these DNA-damaging agents. The principle of the umu-test is based on the ability of the DNA-damaging agents, most of which are potential carcinogens, to induce the umu operon. A plasmid (pSK1002) carrying a fused gene umuC'-'lacZ was introduced into Salmonella typhimurium TA1535. The strain TA1535/pSK1002 enabled us to monitor the levels of umu operon expression by measuring the beta-galactosidase activity in the cells produced by the fusion gene. Using this strain, a simple, inexpensive, and sensitive system, the umu-test, for the screening of environmental mutagens and carcinogens was developed. 38 chemicals with different structures and modes of action, including 31 known animal carcinogens, were examined by the test to evaluate the system. The threshold sensitivity of the umu-test was approximately equal to that of the Ames test for chemicals genotoxic in both tests. By the umu-test, using the single tester strain, we detect many types of DNA-damaging agents for which the Ames test requires several tester strains. Furthermore, the umu-test provides a potential practical advantage for the screening of various environmental samples containing amino acids and nutrients such as urine, serum and foods.     

The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP

The genotoxicity of 30 aromatic amines selected from IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) groups 1, 2A, 2B and 3 and from the U.S. NTP (National Toxicology Program) carcinogenicity database were evaluated using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCG) (Comet) assay in mouse organs. We treated groups of four mice once orally at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and sampled stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow 3, 8 and 24 h after treatment. For the 20 aromatic amines that are rodent carcinogens, the assay was positive in at least one organ, suggesting a high predictive ability for the assay. For most of the SCG-positive aromatic amines, the organs exhibiting increased levels of DNA damage were not necessarily the target organs for carcinogenicity. It was rare, in contrast, for the target organs not to show DNA damage. Organ-specific genotoxicity, therefore, is necessary but not sufficient for the prediction of organ-specific carcinogenicity. For the 10 non-carcinogenic aromatic amines (eight were Ames test-positive and two were Ames test-negative), the assay was negative in all organs studied. In the safety evaluation of chemicals, it is important to demonstrate that Ames test-positive agents are not genotoxic in vivo. Chemical carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic (Ames test-positive) and putative non-genotoxic (Ames test-negative) carcinogens. The alkaline SCG assay, which detects DNA lesions, is not suitable for identifying non-genotoxic carcinogens. The present SCG study revealed a high positive response ratio for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio for rodent genotoxic non-carcinogens. These results suggest that the alkaline SCG assay can be usefully used to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of chemicals in multiple organs, providing for a good assessment of potential carcinogenicity.     

Comparative evaluation of different pairs of DNA repair-deficient and DNA repair-proficient bacterial tester strains for rapid detection of chemical mutagens and carcinogens

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of different pairs of DNA repair-deficient and DNA repair-proficient bacterial tester strains in a mutagenicity/carcinogenicity screen, possibly as complements to the Ames test. 70 carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic compounds, representing a variety of chemical structures, were tested for their DNA-damaging effects, using 6 different DNA-repair-deficient bacterial strains. 2 Bacillus subtilis systems, H17/M45 and HLL3g/HJ-15, were used. The susceptibility of Escherichia coli AB1157 was compared with the susceptibility of 4 recombination-deficient mutants, JC5547, JC2921, JC2926 and JC5519. The test compounds were applied onto paper disks (spot test, ST), or incorporated into a top agar layer (agar-incorporation test, AT). The 2 B. subtilis systems were generally found to be more sensitive and reliable than the assays using E coli. The incorporation of the test compounds in the agar increased the sensitivity of the test for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other poorly water-soluble compounds. Hydrazines and several other highly polar chemicals could be tested more efficiently when applied onto paper disks. About 30% of the test compounds did not induce any growth inhibition and so could not be tested properly. In order to evaluate the ability of these DNA-repair tests to complement the Ames Salmonella mutagenicity test in a genetic toxicology screening program, results from this study were compared with published data both on mutagenicity in the Ames test and on carcinogenicity. 8 carcinogens generally found to be non-mutagenic for Salmonella were tested: 2 showed DNA-damaging properties (mitomycin C, 1,2-dimethylhydrazine), 5 failed to do so (actinomycin D, griseofulvin, thioacetamide, diethylstilbestrol, safrole), and one (thiourea) was not toxic, so that no classification was possible. 2 non-carcinogenic bacterial mutagens were examined; one, sodium azide, was equitoxic for repair-proficient and -deficient strains, while the other, nitrofurantoin, primarily inhibited repair-deficient strains. The DNA-repair tests failed to indicate the mutagenic and carcinogenic properties of acridine orange. Nalidixic acid, a non-mutagenic DNA synthesis inhibitor, damaged bacterial DNA. Apart from the differences summarized above, carcinogenicity was indicated correctly by the Salmonella S9 assay and most sets of DNA-repair-deficient and DNA-repair-proficient tester strains evaluated in this study. Thus, several more carcinogens could be detected by performing the Ames test and the bacterial DNA-repair tests in tandem than by using either test alone. Nevertheless, the use of both bacterial in vitro systems in a battery of short-term tests for mutagenicity/carcinogenicity evaluation is not considered to be ideal, since the Ames test and the pairs of DNA-repair-deficient and DNA-repair-proficient tester strains used had several shortcomings in common under the conditions of this study.     

Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles

One of the consequences of the low specificity of the in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays reported in our previous paper [D. Kirkland, M. Aardema, L. Henderson, L. Muller, Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens. I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity, Mutat. Res. 584 (2005) 1-256] is industry and regulatory agencies dealing with a large number of false-positive results during the safety assessment of new chemicals and drugs. Addressing positive results from in vitro genotoxicity assays to determine which are "false" requires extensive resources, including the conduct of additional animal studies. In order to reduce animal usage, and to conserve industry and regulatory agency resources, we thought it was important to raise the question as to whether the protocol requirements for a valid in vitro assay or the criteria for a positive result could be changed in order to increase specificity without a significant loss in sensitivity of these tests. We therefore analysed some results of the mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) and the chromosomal aberration (CA) test obtained for rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens in more detail. For a number of chemicals that are positive only in either of these mammalian cell tests (i.e. negative in the Ames test) there was no correlation between rodent carcinogenicity and level of toxicity (we could not analyse this for the CA test as insufficient data were available in publications), magnitude of response or lowest effective positive concentration. On the basis of very limited in vitro and in vivo data, we could also find no correlation between the above parameters and formation of DNA adducts. Therefore, a change to the current criteria for required level of toxicity in the MLA, to limit positive calls to certain magnitudes of response, or to certain concentration ranges would not improve the specificity of the tests without significantly reducing the sensitivity. We also investigated a possible correlation between tumour profile (trans-species, trans-sex and multi-site versus single-species, single-sex and single-site) and pattern of genotoxicity results. Carcinogens showing the combination of trans-species, trans-sex and multi-site tumour profile were much more prevalent (70% more) in the group of chemicals giving positive results in all three in vitro assays than amongst those giving all negative results. However, single-species, single-sex, single-site carcinogens were not very prevalent even amongst those chemicals giving three negative results in vitro. Surprisingly, when mixed positive and negative results were compared, multi-site carcinogens were highly prevalent amongst chemicals giving only a single positive result in the battery of three in vitro tests. Finally we extended our relative predictivity (RP) calculations to combinations of positive and negative results in the genotoxicity battery. For two out of three tests positive, the RP for carcinogenicity was no higher than 1.0 and for 2/3 tests negative the RP for non-carcinogenicity was either zero (for Ames+MLA+MN) or 1.7 (for Ames+MLA+CA). Thus, all values were less than a meaningful RP of two, and indicate that it is not possible to predict outcome of the rodent carcinogenicity study when only 2/3 genotoxicity results are in agreement.     

A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins

In vitro genotoxicity testing needs to include tests in both bacterial and mammalian cells, and be able to detect gene mutations, chromosomal damage and aneuploidy. This may be achieved by a combination of the Ames test (detects gene mutations) and the in vitro micronucleus test (MNvit), since the latter detects both chromosomal aberrations and aneuploidy. In this paper we therefore present an analysis of an existing database of rodent carcinogens and a new database of in vivo genotoxins in terms of the in vitro genotoxicity tests needed to detect their in vivo activity. Published in vitro data from at least one test system (most were from the Ames test) were available for 557 carcinogens and 405 in vivo genotoxins. Because there are fewer publications on the MNvit than for other mammalian cell tests, and because the concordance between the MNvit and the in vitro chromosomal aberration (CAvit) test is so high for clastogenic activity, positive results in the CAvit test were taken as indicative of a positive result in the MNvit where there were no, or only inadequate data for the latter. Also, because Hprt and Tk loci both detect gene-mutation activity, a positive Hprt test was taken as indicative of a mouse-lymphoma Tk assay (MLA)-positive, where there were no data for the latter. Almost all of the 962 rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins were detected by an in vitro battery comprising Ames+MNvit. An additional 11 carcinogens and six in vivo genotoxins would apparently be detected by the MLA, but many of these had not been tested in the MNvit or CAvit tests. Only four chemicals emerge as potentially being more readily detected in MLA than in Ames+MNvit--benzyl acetate, toluene, morphine and thiabendazole--and none of these are convincing cases to argue for the inclusion of the MLA in addition to Ames+MNvit. Thus, there is no convincing evidence that any genotoxic rodent carcinogens or in vivo genotoxins would remain undetected in an in vitro test battery consisting of Ames+MNvit.     

Predictive assay for rodent carcinogenicity using in vivo biochemical parameters: operational characteristics and complementarity.

111 chemicals of known rodent carcinogenicity (49 carcinogens, 62 noncarcinogens), including many promoters of carcinogenesis, nongenotoxic carcinogens, hepatocarcinogens, and halogenated hydrocarbons, were selected for study. The chemicals were administered by gavage in two dose levels to female Sprague-Dawley rats. The effects of these 111 chemicals on 4 biochemical assays (hepatic DNA damage by alkaline elution (DD), hepatic ornithine decarboxylase activity (ODC), serum alanine aminotransferase activity (ALT), and hepatic cytochrome P-450 content (P450)) were determined. Composite parameters are defined as follows: CP = [ODC and P450), CT = [ALT and ODC), and TS = [DD or CP or CT]. The operational characteristics of TS for predicting rodent cancer were sensitivity 55%, specificity 87%, positive predictivity 77%, negative predictivity 71%, and concordance 73%. For these chemicals, the 73% concordance of this study was superior to the concordance obtained from published data from other laboratories on the Ames test (53%), structural alerts (SA) (46%), chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells (ABS) (48%), cell mutation in mouse lymphoma 15178Y cells (MOLY) (52%), and sister-chromatid exchange in Chinese hamster ovary cells (SCE) (60%). The 4 in vivo biochemical assays were complementary to each other. The composite parameter TS also shows complementarity to all 5 other predictors of rodent cancer examined in this paper. For example, the Ames test alone has a concordance of only 53%. In combination with TS, the concordance is increased to 62% (Ames or TS) or to 63% (Ames and TS). For the 67 chemicals with data available for SA, the concordance for predicting rodent carcinogenicity was 47% (for SA alone), 54% (for SA or TS), and 66% (for SA and TS). These biochemical assays will be useful: (1) to predict rodent carcinogenicity per se, (2) to 'confirm' the results of short-term mutagenicity tests by the high specificity mode of the biochemical assays (the specificity and positive predictivity are both 100%), and (3) to be a component of future complementary batteries of tests for predicting rodent carcinogenicity.     

The mouse spot test. Evaluation of its performance in identifying chemical mutagens and carcinogens

The published results on 60 chemicals and X-rays investigated in the mouse spot test were compared with data on the same chemicals tested in the bacterial mutation assay (Ames test) and lifetime rodent bioassays. The performance of the spot test as an in vivo complementary assay to the in vitro bacterial mutagenesis test reveals that of 60 agents, 38 were positive in both systems, 6 were positive only in the spot test, 10 were positive only in the bacterial test and 6 were negative in both assays. The spot test was also considered as a predictor of carcinogenesis; 45 chemicals were carcinogenic of which 35 were detected as positive by the spot test and 3 out of 6 non-carcinogens were correctly identified as negative. If the results are regarded in sequence, i.e. that a positive result in a bacterial mutagenicity test reveals potential that may or may not be realized in vivo, then 48 chemicals were mutagenic in the bacterial mutation assay of which 38 were active in the spot test and 31 were confirmed as carcinogens in bioassays. 12 chemicals were non-mutagenic to bacteria of which 6 gave positive responses in the spot test and 5 were confirmed as carcinogens. These results provide strong evidence that the mouse coat spot test is an effective complementary test to the bacterial mutagenesis assay for the detection of genotoxic chemicals and as a confirmatory test for the identification of carcinogens. The main deficiency at present is the paucity of data from the testing of non-carcinogens. With further development and improvement of the test it is probable that the predictive performance of the assay in identifying carcinogens should improve, since many of the false negative responses may be due to inadequate testing.     

Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo

There has been much discussion in recent years regarding the most appropriate follow-up testing in vivo when positive results are obtained in vitro but the in vivo micronucleus (MN) test (traditionally the most widely-used test) is negative. Not all rodent carcinogens give positive results in the micronucleus test, and so it has been common practice to include a second in vivo assay such as the unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) test. This has proved useful but is usually limited to analysis of rodent (usually rat) liver. With the increased evaluation and use of other in vivo assays, e.g. for transgenic mutations (TG) and DNA damage (Comet assay) it was important to investigate their usefulness. We therefore examined the published in vivo UDS, TG and Comet-assay results for 67 carcinogens that were negative or equivocal in the micronucleus test. Between 30 and 41 chemicals were evaluated in each of the three in vivo tests, with some overlap. In general, the UDS test was disappointing and gave positive results with <20% of these carcinogens, some of which induced tumours in rat liver and produced DNA adducts in vivo. The TG assay gave positive responses with >50% of the carcinogens, but the Comet assay detected almost 90% of the micronucleus-negative or equivocal carcinogens. This pattern of results was virtually unchanged when the in vitro profile (gene mutagen or clastogen) was taken into account. High sensitivity (ability to detect carcinogens as positive) is only really useful when the specificity (ability to give negative results with non-carcinogens) is also high. Based on small numbers of publications with non-carcinogens, the TG and Comet assays gave negative results with non-carcinogens on 69 and 78% of occasions, respectively. Although further evaluation of the Comet and TG assays, particularly with non-carcinogens, is needed, these data suggest that they both should play a more prominent role in regulatory testing strategies than the UDS test.     

Genetic toxicology data in the evaluation of potential human environmental carcinogens.

In 1969, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) initiated the Monographs Programme to evaluate the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Results from short-term mutagenicity tests were first included in the IARC Monographs in the mid-1970s based on the observation that most carcinogens are also mutagens, although not all mutagens are carcinogens. Experimental evidence at that time showed a strong correlation between mutagenicity and carcinogenicity and indicated that short-term mutagenicity tests are useful for predicting carcinogenicity. Although the strength of these correlations has diminished over the past 20 years with the identification of putative nongenotoxic carcinogens, such tests provide vital information for identifying potential human carcinogens and understanding mechanisms of carcinogenesis. The short-term test results for agents compiled in the EPA/IARC Genetic Activity Profile (GAP) database over nearly 15 years are summarized and reviewed here with regard to their IARC carcinogenicity classifications. The evidence of mutagenicity or nonmutagenicity based on a 'defining set' of test results from three genetic endpoints (gene mutation, chromosomal aberrations, and aneuploidy) is examined. Recommendations are made for assessing chemicals based on the strength of evidence from short-term tests, and the implications of this approach in identifying mutational mechanisms of carcinogenesis are discussed. The role of short-term test data in influencing the overall classification of specific compounds in recent Monograph volumes is discussed, particularly with reference to studies in human populations. Ethylene oxide is cited as an example.     

The SOS Chromotest, a colorimetric bacterial assay for genotoxins: validation study with 83 compounds

The SOS Chromotest is a simple bacterial colorimetric assay for genotoxicity. It is based on the measure of the induction of sfiA, a gene controlled by the general repressor of the SOS system in E. coli. Expression of sfiA is monitored by means of a gene fusion with lacZ, the structural gene for beta-galactosidase. We have examined 83 compounds of various chemical classes with the SOS Chromotest using a standard procedure. Comparison of the results with those obtained in the Mutatest (the Ames test) showed that most (90%) of the mutagenic compounds were also SOS inducers. For these compounds a quantitative correlation was observed between the mutagenic potency and the SOS-inducing potency (SOSIP). The case of the 10% remaining compounds giving conflicting results in the two tests is discussed. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for carcinogenicity prediction have been evaluated for the SOS Chromotest and the Mutatest using 73 chemicals for which carcinogenicity data were available. In spite of some differences, similar results were obtained in the two tests. The present data indicate that the SOS Chromotest has many practical advantages and may be used as a primary screening tool or as part of a battery of short-term tests for carcinogens.     

Characterization of an in vitro micronucleus assay with Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts

The use of Syrian hamster embryo cells for assessing genotoxicity provides the unique opportunity to determine 5 different end-points (gene mutations, DNA-strand breaks, aneuploidy, DNA repair (unscheduled DNA synthesis, UDS) and neoplastic transformation) in the one cell system. This approach allows direct comparisons of results produced under identical conditions of dose at target, metabolism and bioavailability. We report here on the characterization of an additional end-point in the same cell system: the formation of micronuclei indicating chromosomal changes induced by chemicals. For a preliminary validation of this new test system we have investigated 14 carcinogens and 3 non-carcinogenic structural analogues in order to evaluate the significance of micronucleus induction for carcinogenic properties. All tested carcinogens induced micronuclei in a dose-dependent manner; all non-carcinogens yielded negative results. Correlations between the formation of micronuclei and the Ames test, induction of UDS, cell transformation and the in vivo bone marrow micronucleus test are demonstrated.     

Direct comparison of the Ames microplate format (MPF) test in liquid medium with the standard Ames pre-incubation assay on agar plates by use of equivocal to weakly positive test compounds

The Ames microplate format (MPF?) test, which uses liquid media and in 384-well microplates with a readout based on a colour-change, has been used for over 10 years at several major pharmaceutical companies for screening the genotoxic potential of early drug candidates when compound supply is minimal. Meanwhile, Xenometrix has adapted this screen from the two-strain Ames II test for use with five tester strains, in compliance with OECD Guideline 471. A set of 15 equivocal to weakly positive chemicals selected from the National Toxicology Program (NTP) database was tested simultaneously in the Ames microplate format (MPF) and the standard Ames pre-incubation method on agar plates. Such a direct comparison of the two test methods with the same overnight culture(s), chemicals and S9-mix preparation should exclude external variability factors. Thirteen of the 15 chemicals showed concordant results in both tests despite the choice of chemicals that showed varying inter- and even intra-laboratory results in the NTP studies. These results indicate that the Ames MPF? assay is a reliable predictive tool that can be used like the regular Ames test to evaluate compounds for mutagenicity.     

The Escherichia coli K-12 SOS chromotest agar spot test for simple, rapid detection of genotoxic agents

The Escherichia coli K-12 SOS chromotest is a colorimetric (beta-galactosidase induction) system for detecting genotoxic chemicals as agents which induce filamentation in response to DNA damage. The chromotest was modified from a liquid suspension assay to a simple, convenient agar spot test, which was performed in the manner of a related colorimetric prophage induction assay (BIA). Chromotest agar dishes yielded optimal results after 16-18 h incubation, presumably because of the agar growth characteristics of tester strain PQ37. Of 44 tested chemicals, nitro aromatics, cytotoxic/antitumor agents, polycyclic hydrocarbons and aflatoxins showed good activity. Alkylating agents such as MNNG and MMS were active only at high concentrations. Compounds active in both the chromotest and BIA were active at 10-100-fold lower concentrations in the chromotest. The chromotest appeared to be less effective than the Salmonella Ames mutagenicity test in the detection of diverse classes of chemical carcinogens. The chromotest may be a useful alternative to the BIA in the study of particular classes of genotoxic compounds.     

DNA synthesis inhibition as an indirect mechanism of chromosome aberrations: comparison of DNA-reactive and non-DNA-reactive clastogens

Positive results in the in vitro assay for chromosome aberrations sometimes occur with test chemicals that apparently do not react with DNA, being negative in tests for mutation in bacteria, for DNA strand breaks, and for covalent binding to DNA. These chromosome aberrations typically occur over a narrow concentration range at toxic doses, and with mitotic inhibition. Indirect mechanisms, including oxidative damage, cytotoxicity and inhibition of DNA synthesis induced by chemical exposure, may be involved. Understanding when such mechanisms are operating is important in evaluating potential mutagenic hazards, since the effects may occur only above a certain threshold dose. Here, we used two-parameter flow cytometry to assess DNA synthesis inhibition (uptake of bromodeoxyuridine [BrdUrd]) associated with the induction of aberrations in CHO cells by DNA-reactive and non-reactive chemicals, and to follow cell cycle progression. Aphidicolin (APC), a DNA polymerase inhibitor, induces aberrations without reacting with DNA; 50 μM APC suppressed BrdUrd uptake during a 3-h treatment to < 10% of control levels. Several new drug candidates induced aberrations concomitant with marked reductions in cell counts at 20 h (to 50–60% of controls) and suppression of BrdUrd uptake (<15% of control). Several non-mutagenic chemicals and a metabolic poison, which induce DNA double strand breaks and chromosome aberrations at toxic dose levels, also suppressed DNA synthesis. In contrast, the alkylating agents 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, mitomycin C, methylnitrosourea, ethylnitrosourea, methylmethane sulfonate and ethylmethane sulfonate, and a topoisomerase II inhibitor, etoposide, produced many aberrations at concentrations that were less toxic (cell counts ≥73% of controls) and gave little inhibition of DNA synthesis during treatment (BrdUrd uptake ≥85% of controls), although cell cycle delay was seen following the 3-h treatment. Thus, inhibition of DNA synthesis at the time of treatment is supporting evidence for an indirect mechanism of aberrations, when there is no direct DNA reactivity.     

Alleged misconceptions' distort perceptions of environmental cancer risks.

In a series of papers, Ames and colleagues allege that the scientific and public health communities have perpetuated a series of 'misconceptions' that resulted in inaccurate identification of chemicals that pose potential human cancer risks, and misguided cancer prevention strategies and regulatory policies. They conclude that exposures to industrial and synthetic chemicals represent negligible cancer risks and that animal studies have little or no scientific value for assessing human risks. Their conclusions are based on flawed and untested assumptions. For instance, they claim that synthetic residues on food can be ignored because 99.99% of pesticides humans eat are natural, chemicals in plants are pesticides, and their potential to cause cancer equals that of synthetic pesticides. Similarly, Ames does not offer any convincing scientific evidence to justify discrediting bioassays for identifying human carcinogens. Ironically, their arguments center on a ranking procedure that relies on the same experimental data and extrapolation methods they criticize as being unreliable for evaluating cancer risks. We address their inconsistencies and flaws, and present scientific facts and our perspectives surrounding Ames' nine alleged misconceptions. Our conclusions agree with the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the National Toxicology Program, and other respected scientific organizations: in the absence of human data, animal studies are the most definitive for assessing human cancer risks. Animal data should not be ignored, and precautions should be taken to lessen human exposures. Dismissing animal carcinogenicity findings would lead to human cancer cases as the only means of demonstrating carcinogenicity of environmental agents. This is unacceptable public health policy.     

An evaluation of the mouse sperm morphology test and other sperm tests in nonhuman mammals. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program

The literature on the mouse sperm morphology test and on other sperm tests in nonhuman mammals was reviewed (a) to evaluate the relationship of these tests to chemically induced spermatogenic dysfunction, germ-cell mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity, and (b) to make an interspecies comparison to chemicals. A total of 71 papers were reviewed. The mouse sperm morphology test was used to assess the effects of 154 of the 182 chemical agents covered. 4 other murine sperm tests were also used: the induction of acrosomal abnormalities (4 agents), reduction in sperm counts, (6 agents), motility (5 agents), and F1 sperm morphology (7 agents)). In addition, sperm tests for the spermatogenic effects of 35 agents were done in 9 nonmurine mammalian species; these included analyses for sperm count, motility, and morphology, using a large variety of study designs. For the mouse sperm morphology test, 41 agents were judged by the reviewing committee to be positive inducers of sperm-head shape abnormalities, 103 were negative, and 10 were inconclusive. To evaluate the relationship between changes in sperm morphology and germ cell mutagenicity, the effects of 41 agents on mouse sperm shape were compared to available data from 3 different mammalian germ-cell mutational tests (specific locus, heritable translocation, and dominant lethal). The mouse sperm morphology test was found to be highly sensitive to germ-cell mutagens; 100% of the known mutagens were correctly identified as positives in the sperm morphology test. Data are insufficient at present to access the rate of false positives. Although it is biologically unclear why one might expect changes in sperm morphology to be related to carcinogenesis, we found that (a) a positive response in the mouse sperm morphology test is highly specific for carcinogenic potential (100% for the agents surveyed), and (b) overall, only 50% of carcinogens were positive in the test (i.e., sensitivity approximately equal to 50%). Since many carcinogens do not produce abnormally shaped sperm even at lethal doses, negative findings with the sperm test cannot be used to classify agents as noncarcinogens. We conclude that the mouse sperm morphology test has potential use for identifying chemicals that induce spermatogenic dysfunction and perhaps heritable mutations. Insufficient numbers of chemicals agents have been studied by the other sperm tests to permit similar comparisons. A comparison of 25 chemicals tested with sperm counts, motility, and morphology in at least 2 species (including man, mouse and 9 other mammals) demonstrated good agreement in response among species. With further study, interspecies comparisons of chemically induced sperm changes may be useful for predicting and evaluating human effects.     

Comparison of the continuous rat hepatoma cell line 2sFou with primary rat hepatocyte cultures for the induction of DNA repair synthesis by nitrosamines, benzo[a]pyrene and hydroxyurea

We have examined the suitability of the continuous rat hepatoma cell line 2sFou for testing the genotoxicity of chemicals in comparison with that of primary rat hepatocyte cultures (HPC). The capacity of the cells for metabolic activation was assessed by measuring induction of DNA-repair synthesis and inhibition of replicative DNA synthesis by the test compounds dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), diethylnitrosamine (DEN), hydroxyurea (HU) and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), which are substrates for major hepatic and extrahepatic forms of cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenases. The cellular capacity for DNA-repair synthesis was assessed using UV-light as a DNA-damaging agent. Repair-specific incorporation of [3H]deoxycytidine (3H-dCyd) caused by UV-light was higher in 2sFou cells than in HPC. In contrast, background repair incorporation of 3H-dCyd in 2sFou cells was only 1/3 that found in HPC. All the test agents induced DNA repair and inhibited DNA synthesis in both 2sFou cells and HPC. The two nitrosamines were more effective in HPC than in 2sFou cells. HU and BaP affected DNA repair and DNA synthesis in the two cell systems at a similar range of concentrations. In general, DNA repair in the 2sFou cells increased near linearly with the concentrations of the test compounds. The data indicate that 2sFou cells are capable of activating hepatotropic pro-mutagens/carcinogens such as dialkylnitrosamines, and are sensitive indicators of DNA damage. In contrast, BaP, a non-hepatotoxic compound, caused only little DNA repair in these cells. Thus, continuously growing cells, such as 2sFou, show a qualitatively similar response to genotoxic chemicals as HPC and offer a potential alternative to HPC for genotoxicity testing.