Secretion of LH, FSH and oestradiol-17 beta during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle in the ewe

Plasma concentrations of LH, FSH and oestradiol-17 beta were measured in blood samples taken at 15 min intervals for 48 h during the follicular phase of four Merino ewes. The amplitude of pulses of LH and the mean concentration of LH were higher at the beginning of the follicular phase, 36-24 h before the preovulatory surge of LH (amplitude 2.4 ng ml-1, mean concentration 3.9 ng ml-1), than at the end, 24-0 h before the preovulatory surge (amplitude 1.2 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1; mean concentration 1.4 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1). There was no change in the inter-pulse interval during this time (mean 74 +/- 5 min). Over the same period, oestradiol levels increased from 7-8 pg ml-1 to a peak of 10-15 pg ml-1. Mean FSH concentrations declined (36-24 h: 3.6 ng ml-1 vs 24-0 h: 1.8 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1) before rising at the time of the preovulatory surge of LH and again 24 h later. It was concluded that the biphasic response of LH to oestrogen that is seen in ovariectomized ewes may also operate during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle in entire ewes.     

Effect of transport on pulsatile LH release in ovariectomized ewes with or without prior steroid exposure at different times of year

The initial aim of the present study was to test whether the stress of transport suppresses LH pulsatile secretion in ewes. In a pilot experiment in the late breeding season, transport resulted in an unexpected response in three out of five transported, ovariectomized ewes pretreated with oestradiol and progesterone. Before transport, seasonal suppression of LH pulses had occurred earlier than anticipated, but LH pulsatility suddenly restarted for the period of transport. This finding was reminiscent of unexplained results obtained in ovariectomized ewes infused centrally with high doses of corticotrophin-releasing hormone after pretreatment with low doses of oestradiol with or without progesterone. Hence, an additional aim of the present study was to examine whether these latter results with corticotrophin-releasing hormone could be reproduced by increasing endogenous corticotrophin-releasing hormone secretion by transport. Subsequent experiments used groups of at least eight ovariectomized ewes at different times of the year with or without prior exposure to steroids to assess whether these unexpected observations were associated with season or the prevailing endocrine milieu. In the mid-breeding season, transport for 4 h in the absence of steroid pretreatment for 8 months reduced LH pulse frequency from 7.5 +/- 0.3 to 6.3 +/- 0.4 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) and LH pulse amplitude from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1 (P < 0.05). Similarly, in the mid-breeding season, 34 h after the cessation of pretreatment with oestradiol and progesterone, transport suppressed LH pulse frequency from 6.1 +/- 0.4 to 5.5 +/- 0.3 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) with a tendency of effect on amplitude (6.2 +/- 2.7 to 2.61 +/- 0.6 ng ml-1; P = 0.07; note the large variance in the pretransport data). During mid-anoestrus, evidence of a suppressive effect of transport was only observed on LH pulse amplitude (4.7 +/- 0.6 versus 3.0 +/- 0.5 pulses per 4 h; P < 0.05) in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to ovarian steroids for 4 months. Repetition of the pilot experiment with 12 ewes during the transition into anoestrus resulted in one ewe with LH pulses seasonally suppressed but increased by transport; 11 ewes had a distinct pulsatile LH pattern which was decreased by transport in six ewes. In anoestrus, there was no effect of transport on LH pulse frequency or amplitude in intact ewes, or those ovariectomized 2-3 weeks previously, with or without prior oestradiol and progesterone treatment. However, basal concentrations of cortisol were greater in anoestrus than in the breeding season, and the increment in cortisol during transport was similar in anoestrus and the breeding season but greater during the transition into anoestrus (P < 0.05). Progesterone concentrations increased from 0.31 +/- 0.02 ng ml-1 before transport to 0.48 +/- 0.05 ng ml-1 during the second hour of transport (P < 0.05). In conclusion, transport reduced LH pulse frequency and amplitude in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to exogenous steroids for at least 4 months. In most animals, the previously observed increase in LH pulsatility induced by exogenous CRH was not reproduced by increasing endogenous CRH secretion by transport. However, in four ewes, transport did increase LH pulsatility, but only during the transition into anoestrus in ewes with seasonally suppressed LH profiles after withdrawal of steroid pretreatment.     

Independence of progesterone blockade of the luteinizing hormone surge in ewes from opioid activity at naloxone-sensitive receptors.

Fifteen ovariectomized ewes were treated with implants (s.c.) creating circulating luteal progesterone concentrations of 1.6 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1 serum. Ten days later, progesterone implants were removed from five ewes which were then infused with saline for 64 h (0.154 mol NaCl l-1, 20 ml h-1, i.v.). Ewes with progesterone implants remaining were infused with saline (n = 5) or naloxone (0.5 mg kg-1 h-1, n = 5) in saline for 64 h. At 36 h of infusion, all ewes were injected with oestradiol (20 micrograms in 1 ml groundnut oil, i.m.). During the first 36 h of infusion, serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were similar in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal and ewes infused with naloxone, but with progesterone implants remaining (1.23 +/- 0.11 and 1.28 +/- 0.23 ng ml-1 serum, respectively, mean +/- SEM, P greater than 0.05). These values exceeded circulating LH concentrations during the first 36 h of saline infusion of ewes with progesterone implants remaining (0.59 +/- 0.09 ng ml-1 serum, P less than 0.05). The data suggested that progesterone suppression of tonic LH secretion, before oestradiol injection, was completely antagonized by naloxone. After oestradiol injection, circulating LH concentrations decreased for about 10 h in ewes of all groups. A surge in circulating LH concentrations peaked 24 h after oestradiol injection in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal (8.16 +/- 3.18 ng LH ml-1 serum).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of stress-like concentrations of cortisol on follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep

Stress-like concentrations of cortisol increase the negative feedback potency of oestradiol in castrated male sheep. A similar cortisol-dependent response in female sheep might be expected to suppress gonadotrophin secretion and impair follicular development and ovulation. The oestrous activity of 21 female sheep was synchronized using progestogen-treated vaginal pessaries to test this hypothesis. Stress-like concentrations of cortisol (60-70 ng ml-1) were established by continuous infusion of cortisol (80 micrograms kg-1 h-1; n = 13) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 5 days after, pessary removal. Control animals (n = 8) received a comparable volume of vehicle (50% ethanol-saline) over the 10 day infusion period. Serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively in control sheep during the 48 h immediately after pessary removal. This increase in serum oestradiol was blocked or significantly attenuated in sheep receiving stress-like concentrations of cortisol. Preovulatory surge-like secretion of LH was apparent in control animals 58.5 +/- 2.1 h after pessary removal. In contrast, surge-like secretion of LH was not observed during the 5 days after pessary removal in 54% (7 of 13) of sheep receiving cortisol. Moreover, the onset of the surge was significantly delayed in the cortisol-treated ewes that showed surge-like secretion of LH during the infusion period. The ability of episodic pulses of exogenous GnRH to override the anti-gonadal effect of cortisol was examined in a second study. Oestrous activity of 12 ewes was synchronized using progestogen-containing pessaries as described above. Ewes were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (n = 4 ewes per group). Animals received cortisol (100 micrograms kg-1 h-1; groups 1 and 2) or a comparable volume of vehicle (group 3) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 2 days after, pessary removal. Pulses of GnRH (4 ng kg-1 h-1, i.v.; group 1) or saline (groups 2 and 3) at 1 h intervals were initiated at pessary removal and continued for 48 h. Serum concentrations of oestradiol were not significantly increased after pessary removal in sheep receiving cortisol alone. Conversely, serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively during the 48 h after pessary removal in control ewes and in ewes receiving cortisol and GnRH. At the end of infusion, serum concentrations of oestradiol did not differ (P > 0.05) between control (7.7 +/- 0.8 pg ml-1) ewes and ewes receiving cortisol and episodic GnRH (6.4 +/- 1.3 pg ml-1). Moreover, these values were significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the serum concentrations of oestradiol in animals receiving cortisol (1.0 +/- 0.4 pg ml-1) alone. Collectively, these data indicate stress-like concentrations of cortisol block or delay follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep. In addition, episodic GnRH overrides cortisol-induced delay in follicular maturation.     

Effects of oestradiol on LH, FSH and prolactin in ovariectomized ewes

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the rate (dose/time) at which oestradiol-17 beta (oestradiol) is presented to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis influences secretion of LH, FSH and prolactin. A computer-controlled infusion system was used to produce linearly increasing serum concentrations of oestradiol in ovariectomized ewes over a period of 60 h. Serum samples were collected from ewes every 2 h from 8 h before to 92 h after start of infusion, and assayed for oestradiol, LH, FSH and prolactin. Rates of oestradiol increase were categorized into high (0.61-1.78 pg/h), medium (0.13-0.60 pg/h) and low (0.01-0.12 pg/h). Ewes receiving high rates of oestradiol (N = 11) responded with a surge of LH 12.7 +/- 2.0 h after oestradiol began to increase, whereas ewes receiving medium (N = 15) and low (N = 11) rates of oestradiol responded with a surge of LH at 19.4 +/- 1.7 and 30.9 +/- 2.0 h, respectively. None of the surges of LH was accompanied by a surge of FSH. Serum concentrations of FSH decreased and prolactin increased in ewes receiving high and medium rates of oestradiol, when compared to saline-infused ewes (N = 8; P less than 0.05). We conclude that rate of increase in serum concentrations of oestradiol controls the time of the surge of LH and secretion of prolactin and FSH in ovariectomized ewes. We also suggest that the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of LH may be different from the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of FSH.     

Steroid secretion rates and plasma binding activity in androstenedione-immune ewes with an autotransplanted ovary

Mature Merino ewes in which the left ovary and its vascular pedicle had been autotransplanted to the neck were divided into control (N = 5) and immunized groups (N = 6). The immunized ewes were treated (2 ml s.c.) with Fecundin 1 and 4 weeks before the start of blood sampling. Ovarian and jugular venous blood was collected every 10 min at two stages of the follicular phase (21-27 h and 38-42 h after i.m. injection of 125 micrograms of a prostaglandin (PG) analogue) and during the mid-luteal phase (8 h at 15-min intervals). The ewes were monitored regularly for luteal function and preovulatory LH surges. Hormone concentrations and anti-androstenedione titres were assayed by RIA and ovarian secretion rates of oestradiol-17 beta, progesterone and androstenedione were determined. After the booster immunization, progesterone increased simultaneously with titre in immunized ewes, reaching 30 ng/ml at the time of PG injection when median titre was 1:10,000. All ewes responded to PG with LH surges 42-72 h later: 2 of the immunized ewes then had a second LH surge within 3-4 days at a time when peripheral progesterone values were 2-3 ng/ml. The frequency of steroid and LH pulses was greater in immunized ewes (P less than 0.05) during the luteal phase but not the follicular phase. The secretion rate of androstenedione was 6-10 times greater (19-37 ng/min; P less than 0.001) in immunized ewes at all sampling stages. Progesterone secretion rates were 3 times greater (16 micrograms/min; P less than 0.001) during the luteal phase in immunized ewes. The amplitude of oestradiol pulses was significantly reduced in immunized ewes (4.8 vs 2.1 ng/min at +24 h and 6.5 vs 2.8 ng/min at +40 h in control and immunized ewes, respectively: P less than 0.05) during the follicular phase. However, the mean secretion rate of oestradiol at each phase of the cycle was not significantly different between treatment groups. Analysis of bound and free steroid using polyethylene glycol showed that greater than 98% of peripheral and ovarian venous androstenedione and 86% of peripheral progesterone was bound in immunized ewes but there was no appreciable binding (less than 0.1%) in control ewes. Similarly, 50% of ovarian venous oestradiol was bound in immunized ewes compared to 15% in control ewes. We conclude that immunization against androstenedione increases the secretion rate of androstenedione and progesterone but not of oestradiol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus

The effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus were investigated in two experiments. In the first experiment, the introduction of rams induced an increase in the levels of LH in entire ewes. The mean levels increased from 0.68 +/- 0.04 ng/ml (mean +/- s.e.m.) to 4.49 +/- 1.32 ng/ml within 20 min in ewes not treated with progesterone (n = 10). In ewes bearing progesterone implants that provided a peripheral concentration of about 1.5 ng progesterone per millilitre plasma, the LH response to the introduction of rams was not prevented, but was reduced in size so that the concentration was 1.38 +/- 0.15 ng/ml after 20 min (n = 5). Progesterone treatment begun either 2 days before or 6 h after the introduction of rams and maintained for 4 days prevented ovulation. In the second experiment ovariectomized ewes were used to investigate further the mechanism by which the ram evoked increases in tonic LH secretion. In ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants, the introduction of rams increased the frequency of the LH pulses and the basal level of LH. In the absence of oestradiol there was no significant change in pulse frequency but a small increase in basal levels. Progesterone again did not prevent but reduced the responses in ewes treated with oestradiol. It is suggested that following the withdrawal of progesterone treatment, the secretion of LH pulses in response to the ram effect would be dampened. This effect could be a component of the reported long delay between the introduction of rams and the preovulatory surge of LH in ewes treated with progesterone. Continued progesterone treatment prevented ovulation, probably by blocking positive feedback by oestradiol.     

Oestradiol and the preovulatory surges of luteinising hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in ewes during the breeding season and transition into anoestrus

This study was designed to see if giving exogenous oestradiol, during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of intact ewes, during the breeding season or transition into anoestrus, would alter the occurrence, timing or magnitude of the preovulatory surge of secretion of luteinising hormone (LH) or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). During the breeding season and the time of transition, separate groups of ewes were infused (intravenously) with either saline (30 ml h⁻¹; n = 6) or oestradiol in saline (n = 6) for 30 h. Infusion started 12 h after removal of progestin-containing intravaginal sponges that had been in place for 12 days. The initial dose of oestradiol was 0.02 μg h⁻¹; this was doubled every 4 h for 20 h, followed by every 5 h up to 30 h, to reach a maximum of 1.5 μg h⁻¹. Following progestin removal during the breeding season, peak serum concentrations of oestradiol in control ewes were 10.31 ± 1.04 pg ml⁻¹, at 49.60 ± 3.40 h after progestin removal. There was no obvious peak during transition, but at a time after progestin removal equivalent to the time of the oestradiol peak in ewes at mid breeding season, oestradiol concentrations were 6.70 ± 1.14 pg ml⁻¹ in ewes in transition (P < 0.05). In oestradiol treated ewes, peak serum oestradiol concentrations (24.8 ± 2.1 pg ml⁻¹) and time to peak (41.00 ± 0.05 h) did not differ between seasons (P > 0.05). During the breeding season, all six control ewes and four of six ewes given oestradiol showed oestrus with LH and FSH surges. The two ewes not showing oestrus did not respond to oestrus synchronisation and had persistently high serum concentrations of progesterone. During transition, three of six control ewes showed oestrus but only two had LH and FSH surges; all oestradiol treated ewes showed oestrus and gonadotrophin surges (P < 0.05). The timing and magnitude of LH and FSH surges did not vary with treatment or season. In blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h, from 12 h after the start of oestradiol infusion, mean serum concentrations of LH and LH pulse frequency were lower in control ewes during transition than during mid breeding season (P < 0.05). Oestradiol treatment resulted in lower mean serum concentrations of LH in season and lower LH pulse frequency in transition (P < 0.05). We concluded that enhancing the height of the preovulatory peak in serum concentrations of oestradiol during the breeding season did not alter the timing or the magnitude of the preovulatory surge of LH and FSH secretion and that at transition into anoestrus, oestradiol can induce oestrus and the surge release of LH and FSH as effectively as during the breeding season.     

Effect of duration of infusion of stress-like concentrations of cortisol on follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep

Stress-like levels of cortisol suppress follicular growth and development and block or delay the preovulatory surge of LH when cortisol is continuously administered during the late luteal and early follicular phases of the ovine oestrous cycle. We postulated that cortisol infusion of shorter duration would have a similar effect. To test this hypothesis the oestrous cycles of mature ewes were synchronized using progestin-treated vaginal pessaries. Ewes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Animals received cortisol (0.1mg/kg/h; n=8) or vehicle alone (n=8) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 5 days after, pessary removal (PR). Additional groups received cortisol only during the 5 days period before (n=7), or the 5 days period after (n=8), PR. Continuous delivery of cortisol established stable serum concentrations of cortisol of 72.0+/-2.5ng/ml within 6h of initiation of infusion. Serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively during the period after PR in control animals receiving vehicle alone and the preovulatory surge of LH was evident in all control animals (eight of eight) 55.5+/-5.0h after PR. In contrast, follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH were evident during the period of cortisol infusion in only one of eight animals receiving stress-like levels of cortisol over the entire 10-day infusion period. Similarly, neither follicular development nor surge-like secretion of LH were evident during the infusion period in animals (zero of eight) receiving cortisol during the 5-day period after PR. This cortisol-dependent suppression of ovarian activity in sheep receiving stress-like levels of cortisol during the 5 days after PR was temporary and follicular development, the ovulatory surge of LH, and subsequent luteal function were evident in six of eight ewes after cessation of cortisol delivery. Similarly, follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH were noted within 5 days after PR in four of seven ewes receiving cortisol only during the 5-day period prior to PR. Collectively, these data indicate that stress-like levels of cortisol reduce fertility of sheep by suppressing follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH. Additionally, cortisol delivery during the follicular phase has a more profound suppressive effect on follicular development than cortisol administration during the luteal phase.     

Effect of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH1-24) on ovine pituitary gland responsiveness to exogenous pulsatile GnRH and oestradiol-induced LH release in vivo.

The present experiment was designed to determine if and how exogenous ACTH replicates the effects of stressors to delay the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Twenty-four hours after oestrous synchronisation with prostaglandin in the breeding season, groups of 8-9 intact ewes were injected with 50 microg oestradiol benzoate (0 h) followed 8 h later by 3 injections of saline or GnRH (500 ng each, i.v.) at 2 h intervals (controls). Two further groups received an additional 'late' injection of ACTH (0.8 mg i.m.) 7.5 h after oestradiol, i.e., 0.5 h before the first saline or GnRH challenge. To examine if the duration of prior exposure to ACTH was important, another group of ewes was given ACTH 'early', i.e. 2.5 h before the first GnRH injection. The first GnRH injection produced a maximum LH response of 1.9+/-0.4 ng/ml which was significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced after the second and third GnRH challenge (7.1+/-1.5 ng/ml and 7.0+/-1.7 ng/ml, respectively; 'self-priming'). Late ACTH did not affect the LH response after the first GnRH challenge (1.9+/-0.4 vs. 1.8+/-0.3 ng/ml; p > 0.05) but decreased maximum LH concentrations after the second GnRH to 35% (7.1+/-1.5 vs. 4.6+/-1.1 ng/ml; p = 0.07) and to 40% after the third GnRH (7.0+/-1.7 vs. 4.0+/-0.8 ng/ml; p = 0.05). When ACTH was given early, 4.5 h before the second GnRH, there was no effect on this LH response suggesting that the effect decreases with time after ACTH administration. Concerning the oestradiol-induced LH surge, exogenous GnRH alone delayed the onset time (20.5+/-2.0 vs. 27.8+/-2.1 h; p > 0.05) and reduced the duration of the surge (8.5+/-0.9 vs. 6.7+/-0.6 h; p > 0.05). The onset of the LH surge was observed within 40 h after oestradiol on 29 out of 34 occasions in the saline +/- GnRH treated ewes compared to 11 out of 34 occasions (p < 0.05) when ACTH was also given, either late or early. In those ewes that did not have an LH surge by the end of sampling, plasma progesterone concentrations during the following oestrous cycle increased 2 days later suggesting a delay, not a complete blockade of the LH surge. In conclusion, we have revealed for the first time that ACTH reduces the GnRH self-priming effect in vivo and delays the LH surge, at least partially by direct effects at the pituitary gland.     

Morphine, naloxone and the gonadotrophin surge in ewes

Possible endogenous opioid peptide regulation of the preovulatory gonadotrophin surge was examined in ewes during the breeding season. Intact ewes (n = 54) were synchronized by treatment for 12 days with intravaginal sponges releasing medroxyprogesterone acetate. Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion prior to and during the gonadotrophin surge were not affected by naloxone (0.33 mg/kg body wt per h) administered from the time of medroxyprogesterone acetate withdrawal until 30 h after the onset of oestrus (n = 6). Morphine was administered in 4 patterns: (i) 0.25 mg morphine/kg body wt per h from medroxy-progesterone acetate withdrawal until 30 h after the onset of oestrus (n = 6), (ii) 0.25 mg morphine/kg body wt per h from 24 to 48 h after medroxyprogesterone acetate withdrawal (n = 6), (iii) 0.50 mg morphine/kg body wt per h from 24 to 36 h after medroxyprogesterone acetate withdrawal (n = 6) and (iv) 0.50 mg morphine/kg body wt per h from 18 to 30 h after medroxyprogesterone acetate withdrawal (n = 6). Oestrus and the gonadotrophin surge were delayed, but not blocked, in all cases of morphine administration (P less than 0.05). Inconsistent effects of morphine on circulating oestradiol and gonadotrophin concentrations prior to the gonadotrophin surge suggest that the delays are not due to reduced gonadotrophic support of ovarian oestradiol output. Morphine may reduce responsiveness of central behavioural and gonadotrophin surge-generating centres to the oestradiol signal. The absence of effects of naloxone on gonadotrophin secretion suggest that suppression of LH secretion by opioid peptide activity is reduced after the end of the luteal phase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interactions between inhibin, oestradiol and progesterone in the control of gonadotrophin secretion in the ewe

Experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that inhibin and oestradiol act synergistically to inhibit the secretion of FSH, to test for effects of progesterone, and to compare the FSH and LH responses to ovarian feedback. In Exp. 1, with 11 ovariectomized and 12 intact Romanov ewes during the anoestrous season, doses of oestradiol (administered by means of subcutaneous implants) that restored normal LH pulse frequencies were insufficient to restore normal concentrations of FSH. In Exp. 2, with 48 ovariectomized Welsh Mountain ewes during the breeding season, a factorial design with 4 ewes per cell was used to assess the responses in LH and FSH to 3 doses of oestradiol (s.c. implants) and 4 doses of bovine follicular fluid ('inhibin', 0.2-1.6 ml s.c. every 8 h). This was done initially in the absence of progesterone and then after 7 days of treatment with progesterone (s.c. implants). Analysis of variance revealed a significant synergistic interaction between oestradiol and inhibin on the plasma concentrations of FSH. Progesterone had little effect. In contrast, there was a significant synergistic interaction between oestradiol and progesterone on the concentrations of LH. 'Inhibin' also inhibited LH secretion but this effect was independent of the two steroids. We conclude that there are basic differences in the way that ovarian feedback acts to control the secretion of LH and FSH in the ewe. FSH secretion appears to be primarily controlled by the synergistic action of oestradiol and inhibin on the anterior pituitary gland, while the secretion of LH is inhibited during the follicular phase by an effect of oestrogen at pituitary level and during the luteal phase by the synergistic action of oestradiol and progesterone at the hypothalamic level. Inhibin, or another non-steroidal factor in follicular fluid, may also play a minor role in the control of LH secretion.     

Effects of an opioid antagonist on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe vary with changes in steroid negative feedback

In ewes during the breeding season, estradiol (E) and progesterone (P) synergistically regulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. E primarily inhibits LH pulse amplitude and P inhibits LH pulse frequency. To determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) mediate these negative feedback effects, we administered the long-acting opioid antagonist WIN 44,441-3 (WIN) to intact ewes during the luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle and to ovariectomized ewes treated with no steroids, E, P, or E plus P. Steroid levels were maintained at levels seen during the estrous cycle by Silastic implants placed shortly after surgery. WIN increased LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, in luteal phase ewes. In contrast, during the follicular phase, LH pulse amplitude was increased by WIN and pulse frequency was unchanged. Neither LH pulse frequency nor pulse amplitude was affected by WIN in long-term ovariectomized ewes untreated with steroids. In contrast, WIN slightly increased LH pulse frequency in short-term ovariectomized ewes. WIN also increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with P or E plus P. WIN did not affect pulse frequency but did increase LH pulse amplitude in E-treated ewes. These results support the hypothesis that EOP participate in the negative feedback effects of E and P on pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season and that the inhibitory effects of EOP may persist for some time after ovariectomy.     

Progesterone pretreatment has a direct effect on GnRH-induced preovulatory follicles to determine their ability to develop into normal corpora lutea in anoestrous ewes

In two experiments carried out during seasonal anoestrus, Romney Marsh ewes were treated with small-dose (250 ng) multiple injections of GnRH at 2-h intervals with and without progesterone pretreatment. In Exp. 1, 8/8 progesterone-primed ewes ovulated and produced functionally normal corpora lutea compared with 2/9 non-primed ewes. Follicles were recovered from similarly treated animals 18 or 28 h after the start of GnRH treatment (at least 14 h before the estimated time of the LH peak) and assessed in terms of diameter, granulosa cell number, oestradiol, testosterone and progesterone concentrations in the follicular fluid, oestradiol production in vitro and binding of 125I-labelled hCG to granulosa and theca. There were no significant differences in any of these measures in 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the progesterone-pretreated compared to non-pretreated animals. In Exp. 2, follicles were removed from similar treatment groups just before and 2 h after the start of the LH surge. Unlike 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the non-pretreated ewes, those recovered from progesterone-pretreated ewes responded to the LH surge by significantly increasing oestradiol secretion (P less than 0.01) and binding of 125I-labelled hCG (P less than 0.05) to granulosa cells. Overall there was also more (P less than 0.05) hCG binding to granulosa and theca cells from progesterone-pretreated animals. Non-ovulatory follicles recovered from progesterone-primed ewes had more (P less than 0.05) binding of 125I-labelled hCG to theca and a higher testosterone concentration in follicular fluid (P less than 0.05) than did those from non-primed ewes. These results suggest that inadequate luteal function after repeated injections of GnRH may be due to a poor response to the LH surge indicative of a deficiency in the final maturational stages of the follicle.     

Compensation by pulsatile GnRH infusions for incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and castrated male pigs.

The aim of this study was to investigate incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and male pigs. Gilts (250 days old; n = 36), which had been ovariectomized 30 (OVX 30) or 100 days (OVX 100) before the start of treatment, were challenged i.m. with oestradiol benzoate and were either given no further treatment, fed methallibure to inhibit endogenous GnRH release or fed methallibure and given i.v. pulses of 100 or 200 ng GnRH agonist at 1 h intervals during the LH surge (48-96 h after oestradiol benzoate). The same treatments were applied to long-term orchidectomized male pigs (ORC, n = 23). In addition, one ORC group was not injected with oestradiol benzoate but was fed methallibure and given pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist. Oestradiol benzoate alone induced an LH surge in the OVX 30 group only (5/6 gilts), methallibure suppressed (P < 0.05) oestradiol benzoate-induced LH secretion, while pulses of 100 ng GnRH agonist in animals fed methallibure produced LH surges in four of six OVX 30 and four of six OVX 100 gilts. The induced LH surges were similar to those produced by oestradiol benzoate alone in OVX 30 gilts. Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist produced LH surges in OVX 30 (6/6) and OVX 100 (6/6) gilts and increased the magnitude of the induced LH surge in OVX 100 gilts (P < 0.05 compared with 100 ng GnRH agonist or OVX 30 control). Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist also induced LH surge release in ORC male pigs (5/6), but were unable to increase LH concentrations in a surge-like manner in ORC animals that had not been given oestradiol benzoate, indicating that oestradiol increases pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. These results support the hypothesis that oestradiol must inhibit secretion of LH before an LH surge can occur. It is concluded that incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovarian secretion-deprived gilts and in male pigs is due to the failure of oestradiol to promote a sufficient increase in the release of GnRH.     

Effect of oxytocin infusion on secretion of progesterone and luteinizing hormone and the concentration of uterine oxytocin receptors during the periovulatory period in cloprostenol-treated ewes.

Oxytocin infusions were initiated on day 10 of the oestrous cycle in ewes, and luteal regression was induced by injection of 100 micrograms cloprostenol on day 12. Blood samples were collected at frequent intervals via an indwelling jugular vein cannula to measure concentrations of progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) during the luteal and follicular phases in saline (n = 6) and oxytocin (n = 5) infused animals. The oxytocin infusion maintained peripheral plasma concentrations of 53 +/- 3.2 pg oxytocin ml-1 (mean +/- SEM) compared with values of about 1 pg ml-1 during oestrus in control ewes. Oxytocin infusion had no effect on luteal phase progesterone concentrations, the timing of luteolysis, basal luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, LH pulse frequency, or the timing or height of the LH surge. Treated ewes came into oestrus significantly earlier than controls (P < 0.05) but ovulated normally. Uterine samples collected 96 h after cloprostenol injection (approximately day 2 of the cycle) showed that oxytocin receptor concentrations were significantly higher in the endometrium in ewes that had been given a 5 day oxytocin infusion than in control animals (556 and 262 fmol mg-1 protein, respectively: geometric means from ANOVA, P < 0.001), whereas myometrial receptor concentrations were not affected (113 and 162 fmol mg-1 protein, respectively). We conclude that the previously reported delay in luteal development caused by oxytocin infusion (Wathes et al., 1991) is not due to the inhibition or delay of ovulation, but must instead occur via a direct influence on the developing corpus luteum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Different effects of subnormal levels of progesterone on the pulsatile and surge mode secretion of luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized goats

This study tested the hypothesis that endocrinological threshold levels of progesterone that induce negative feedback effects on the pulsatile and surge modes of LH secretion are different. Our approach was to examine the effects of subnormal progesterone concentrations on LH secretion. Long-term ovariectomized Shiba goats that had received implants of silastic capsules containing estradiol were divided into three groups. The high progesterone (high P) group received a subcutaneous implant of a silastic packet (50 x 70 mm) containing progesterone, and the low progesterone (low P) group received a similar implant of a small packet (25 x 40 mm) containing progesterone. The control (non-P) group received no treatment with exogenous progesterone. Blood samples were collected daily throughout the experiment for the analysis of gonadal steroid hormone levels and at 10-min intervals for 8 h on Days 0, 3, and 7 (Day 0: just before progesterone treatment) for analysis of the pulsatile frequency of LH secretion. Then estradiol was infused into the jugular vein of all animals at a rate of 3 microg/h for 16 h on Day 8 to determine whether an LH surge was induced. Blood samples were collected every 2 h from 4 h before the start of the estradiol infusion until 48 h after the start of the infusion. In each group, the mean +/- SEM concentration after progesterone implant treatment was 3.3 +/- 0.1 ng/ml for the high P group, 1.1 +/- 0.1 ng/ml for the low P group, and <0.1 ng/ml for the non-P group, concentrations similar to the luteal levels, subluteal levels, and follicular phase levels of the normal estrous cycle, respectively. The estradiol concentration ranged from 4 to 8 pg/ml after estradiol capsule implants in all groups. The LH pulse frequency was significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed on Day 3 (6.2 +/- 0.5 pulses/8 h) and on Day 7 (2.6 +/- 0.9 pulses/8 h) relative to Day 0 (9.0 +/- 0.5 pulses/8 h) in the high P group. In both the low P and non-P groups, however, the changes of pulsatile frequency of LH were not significantly different, and high pulses (7-9 pulses/8 h) were maintained on each of the 3 days they were tested. An LH surge (peak concentration, 100.3 +/- 11.0 ng/ml) occurred in all goats in the non-P group, whereas there was no surge mode secretion of LH in either the high P or the low P group. The results of this study support our hypothesis that the threshold levels of progesterone that regulate negative feedback action on the LH pulse and the LH surge are different. Low levels of progesterone, around 1 ng/ml, completely suppressed the LH surge but did not affect the pulsatile frequency of LH secretion.     

Effects of bovine follicular fluid inhibin on serum gonadotrophin concentrations in ewes during oestrus

Experiments were conducted with ewes to investigate the effects of an enriched bovine follicular fluid inhibin preparation (INH) on gonadotrophin secretion after the onset of oestrus. Administration of INH (10 mg) 1 h after the onset of oestrus did not significantly alter the preovulatory FSH and LH surges or the second FSH peak. To determine the effects of INH on the second FSH surge, ewes were treated with saline (N = 7) or INH (N = 10) at 4 h (10 mg) and 24 h (5 mg) after the peak of the preovulatory LH surge. The second FSH surge was delayed about 24 h (P less than 0.05) in ewes treated with INH; however, the delay did not alter the interval to the next oestrus. In a third experiment, 16 ewes were assigned to 4 groups in a 2 x 2 factorial with the main effects being ovariectomy at 4 h and INH treatment (10 mg) at 4, 20 and 36 h after the peak of the LH surge. Controls received sham ovariectomy and saline injection as appropriate. Ovariectomy resulted in a rapid increase in serum FSH but not LH and this was delayed (P less than 0.05) by INH treatment. These results indicate that inhibin has a selective inhibitory action on FSH secretion in ewes and suggests that the second FSH surge results from increased basal FSH secretion due to decreased endogenous inhibin levels.     

Effect of GnRH antagonist-induced prolonged follicular phase on follicular atresia and oocyte developmental competence in vitro in superovulated heifers

A GnRH antagonist (Antarelix) was used to suppress endogenous pulsatile secretion of LH and delay the preovulatory LH surge in superovulated heifers to study the effect of a prolonged follicular phase on both follicle and oocyte quality. Oestrous cycles were synchronized in 12 heifers with progestagen (norgestomet) implants for 10 days. On day 4 (day 0 = day of oestrus), heifers were stimulated with 24 mg pFSH for 4 days and luteolysis was induced at day 6 with PGF2 alpha (2 ml Estrumate). Animals in the control group (n = 4) were killed 24 h after the last FSH injection. At this time, heifers in group A36h (n = 4) and group A60h (n = 4) were treated with 1.6 mg of Antarelix every 12 h for 36 and 60 h, respectively, and then killed. After dissection of ovarian follicles, oocytes were collected for individual in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture; follicular fluid was collected for determination of steroid concentrations, and granulosa cells were smeared, fixed and stained for evaluation of pycnosis rates. Granulosa cell smears showed that 90% of follicles were healthy in the control group. In contrast, 36 and 58% of the follicles in group A36h showed signs of early or advanced atresia, respectively, while 90% of the follicles in group A60h showed signs of late atresia. Intrafollicular concentrations of oestradiol decreased (P < 0.0001) from healthy follicles (799.14 +/- 40.65 ng ml-1) to late atretic follicles (3.96 +/- 0.59 ng ml-1). Progesterone concentrations were higher (P < 0.0001) in healthy follicles compared with atretic follicles, irrespective of degree of atresia. Oestradiol:progesterone ratios decreased (P < 0.0001) from healthy (4.58 +/- 0.25) to late atretic follicles (0.07 +/- 0.009). The intrafollicular concentrations of oestradiol and progesterone were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in the control than in the treated groups. The oestradiol:progesterone ratio was higher (P < 0.0001) in the control (4.55 +/- 0.25) than in the A36h (0.40 +/- 0.05) and A60h (0.07 +/- 0.009) groups. Unexpectedly, the cleavage rate of fertilized oocytes, blastocyst rate and number of cells per blastocyst were not significantly different among control (85%, 41% and 95 +/- 8), A36h (86%, 56% and 93 +/- 5) and A60h (88%, 58% and 79 +/- 4) groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in the blastocyst rates from oocytes derived from healthy (45%), early atretic (54%), advanced atretic (57%) and late atretic follicles (53%). In conclusion, the maintenance of the preovulatory follicles in superovulated heifers with a GnRH antagonist induced more atresia and a decrease in oestradiol and progesterone concentrations. However, the developmental potential in vitro to day 8 of the oocytes recovered from these atretic follicles was not affected.     

Changes in gonadotrophin secretion and ovarian antral follicular activity in seasonally breeding sheep throughout the year

Overall, significantly more antral follicles greater than or equal to 1 mm diameter were present in Romney ewes during anoestrus than in the breeding season (anoestrus, 35 +/- 3 (mean +/- s.e.m.) follicles per ewe, 23 sheep; Day 9-10 of oestrous cycle, 24 +/- 1 follicles per ewe, 22 sheep; P less than 0.01), although the mean numbers of preovulatory-sized follicles (greater than or equal to 5 mm diam.) were similar (anoestrus, 1.3 +/- 0.2 per ewe; oestrous cycle, 1.0 +/- 0.1 per ewe). The ability of ovarian follicles to synthesize oestradiol did not differ between anoestrus and the breeding season as assessed from the levels of extant aromatase enzyme activity in granulosa cells and steroid concentrations in follicular fluid. Although the mean plasma concentration of LH did not differ between anoestrus and the luteal phase of the breeding season, the pattern of LH secretion differed markedly; on Day 9-10 of the oestrous cycle there were significantly more (P less than 0.001) high-amplitude LH peaks (i.e. greater than or equal to 1 ng/ml) in plasma and significantly fewer (P less than 0.001) low amplitude peaks (less than 1 ng/ml) than in anoestrous ewes. Moreover, the mean concentrations of FSH and prolactin were significantly lower during the luteal phase of the cycle than during anoestrus (FSH, P less than 0.05, prolactin, P less than 0.001). It is concluded that, in Romney ewes, the levels of antral follicular activity change throughout the year in synchrony with the circannual patterns of prolactin and day-length. Also, these data support the notion that anovulation during seasonal anoestrus is due to a reduced frequency of high-amplitude LH discharges from the pituitary gland.