Step-wise formation of eukaryotic double-row polyribosomes and circular translation of polysomal mRNA

The time course of polysome formation was studied in a long-term wheat germ cell-free translation system using sedimentation and electron microscopy techniques. The polysomes were formed on uncapped luciferase mRNA with translation-enhancing 5′ and 3′ UTRs. The formation of fully loaded polysomes was found to be a long process that required many rounds of translation and proceeded via several phases. First, short linear polysomes containing no more than six ribosomes were formed. Next, folding of these polysomes into short double-row clusters occurred. Subsequent gradual elongation of the clusters gave rise to heavy-loaded double-row strings containing up to 30–40 ribosomes. The formation of the double-row polysomes was considered to be equivalent to circularization of polysomes, with antiparallel halves of the circle being laterally stuck together by ribosome interactions. A slow exchange with free ribosomes and free mRNA observed in the double-row type polysomes, as well as the resistance of translation in them to AMP-PNP, provided evidence that most polysomal ribosomes reinitiate translation within the circularized polysomes without scanning of 5′ UTR, while de novo initiation including 5′ UTR scanning proceeds at a much slower rate. Removal or replacements of 5′ and 3′ UTRs affected the initial phase of translation, but did not prevent the formation of the double-row polysomes during translation.     

ePAT: a simple method to tag adenylated RNA to measure poly(A)-tail length and other 3' RACE applications

The addition of a poly(A)-tail to the 3' termini of RNA molecules influences stability, nuclear export, and efficiency of translation. In the cytoplasm, dynamic changes in the length of the poly(A)-tail have long been recognized as reflective of the switch between translational silence and activation. Thus, measurement of the poly(A)-tail associated with any given mRNA at steady-state can serve as a surrogate readout of its translation-state. Here, we describe a simple new method to 3'-tag adenylated RNA in total RNA samples using the intrinsic property of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I to extend an RNA primer using a DNA template. This tag can serve as an anchor for cDNA synthesis and subsequent gene-specific PCR to assess poly(A)-tail length. We call this method extension Poly(A) Test (ePAT). The ePAT approach is as efficient as traditional Ligation-Mediated Poly(A) Test (LM-PAT) assays, avoids problems of internal priming associated with oligo-dT-based methods, and allows for the accurate analysis of both the poly(A)-tail length and alternate 3' UTR usage in 3' RACE applications.     

Extensive homology between poly(A)-containing mRNA and purified nominal poly(A)-lacking mRNA in mouse kidney

To investigate poly(A)-lacking mRNA in mouse kidney, we studied a fraction of renal mRNA that does not bind to oligo(dT)-cellulose but can be purified by benzoylated cellulose chromatography. Nominal poly(A)-lacking mRNA and poly(A)-containing mRNA have complete nucleotide sequence homology, suggesting that kidney does not contain mRNAs that are not represented in the polyadenylated RNA fraction. Translation products directed by nominal poly(A)-lacking mRNA and poly(A)-containing mRNA are qualitatively and quantitatively similar in one-dimensional polyacrylamide gels. [3H]cDNA transcribed from poly(A)-containing mRNA hybridizes with its template and with nominal poly(A)-lacking mRNA to the same extent (95%) and with the same kinetics; reaction of [3H]cDNA to nominal poly(A)-lacking mRNA with the two mRNA populations gives the same result. The extensive homology these two mRNA populations share is important to the interpretation of mRNA lifetime and to the analysis of authentic poly(A)-lacking mRNAs.     

A circular dichroism study of poly dG, poly dC, and poly dG:dC

We have measured the ultraviolet circular dichroism spectra of oligo d(pG)₅, poly dN AcG, poly dI, poly dC, two samples of poly dG, and four samples containing double-stranded poly dG:dC. We find that oligo d(pG)₅ and poly dG exist in self-complexed forms as well as in single-stranded forms. Unlike the self-complexed form of poly dG, the single-stranded form of poly dG can hydrogen-bond with single-stranded poly dC. We present spectral data for double-stranded poly dG:dC, which can be used to help characterize poly dG:dC preparations and which provide a basis for resolving discrepancies among other reported poly dG:dC spectra.     

mRNA with a <20-nt poly(A) tail imparted by the poly(A)-limiting element is translated as efficiently in vivo as long poly(A) mRNA

The poly(A)-limiting element (PLE) is a conserved sequence that restricts the length of the poly(A) tail to <20 nt. This study compared the translation of PLE-containing short poly(A) mRNA expressed in cells with translation in vitro of mRNAs with varying length poly(A) tails. In transfected cells, PLE-containing mRNA had a <20-nt poly(A) and accumulated to a level 20% higher than a matching control without a PLE. It was translated as well as the matching control mRNA with long poly(A) and showed equivalent binding to polysomes. Translation in a HeLa cell cytoplasmic extract was used to examine the impact of the PLE in the context of varying length poly(A) tails. Here the overall translation of +PLE mRNA was less than control mRNA with the same length poly(A), and the PLE did not overcome the effect of a short poly(A) tail. Because poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) is a dominant effector of poly(A)-dependent translation we reasoned excess PABP in our extract might overwhelm PLE regulation of translation. This was confirmed by experiments where PABP was inactivated with poly(rA) or Paip2, and the effect of both treatments was reversed by addition of recombinant PABP. These data indicate that the PLE functionally substitutes for bound PABP to stimulate translation of short poly(A) mRNA.     

The poly(A)-binding protein facilitates in vitro translation of poly(A)-rich mRNA

To investigate the role of the 73-kDa poly(A)-binding protein in protein synthesis, the effect of the addition of homo-polyribonucleotides on the translation of polyadenylated and non-adenylated mRNA was studied in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Poly(A) was found to be the most effective polynucleotide in inhibiting duck-globin mRNA translation, whereas it had no effect on the translation of polyribosomal duck-globin mRNP, or on the endogenous synthesis of the rabbit reticulocyte lysate. The translation of poly(A)-free mRNA was not affected by the addition of poly(A). Furthermore, we found that the inhibiting effect of poly(A) can be reversed by addition of purified poly(A)-binding protein. It is thus likely that the 73-kDa poly(A)-binding protein is an essential factor necessary for poly(A)-rich mRNA translation.     

Energy requirement and kinetics of transport of poly(A)-free histone mRNA compared to poly(A)-rich mRNA from isolated L-cell nuclei

ATP-promoted efflux of poly(A)-rich RNA from isolated nuclei of prelabeled mouse lymphoma L5178y cells has an activation energy of 51.5 kJ/mol, similar to that found for the nuclear envelope nucleoside triphosphatase (48.1 kJ/mol) assumed to be involved in mediating nucleocytoplasmic transport of at least some RNA. Here we show that efflux of two specific poly(A)-rich mRNAs (actin and beta-tubulin) from isolated L-cell nuclei is almost totally dependent on the presence of ATP, while efflux of poly(A)-free histone mRNA (H4, H2B, and H1) also occurs to a marked extent in the absence of this nucleotide. Measurements of temperature dependence of transport rate revealed an activation energy of 56.1 kJ/mol for actin mRNA, while the activation energy for histone-H4-mRNA efflux was in the same range as that found for ATP-induced release of RNA from demembranated nuclei (about 15-20 kJ/mol). Addition of nonhydrolyzable nucleotide analogs of ATP to the in vitro system used for measurement of RNA transport did not result in release of nonhistone mRNA (actin), but enhanced the efflux of H4 mRNA to approximately the same extent as ATP. Although not absolutely required, addition of ATP stimulated the rate of export of histone mRNA about twofold. Only the poly(A)-rich RNA, but not the poly(A)-free RNA, released from isolated nuclei was found to compete with poly(A) for the nuclear envelope mRNA-binding site, indicating the mechanism of transport for both RNA classes to be distinct. Export of both nonhistone and histone mRNA was found to be inhibited by a monoclonal antibody against a p60 nuclear-pore-complex antigen. This antibody had no effect on the nucleoside triphosphatase, mediating transport of poly(A)-rich mRNA.     

Polyadenylation of maternal mRNA during oocyte maturation: poly(A) addition in vitro requires a regulated RNA binding activity and a poly(A) polymerase.

Specific maternal mRNAs receive poly(A) during early development as a means of translational regulation. In this report, we investigated the mechanism and control of poly(A) addition during frog oocyte maturation, in which oocytes advance from first to second meiosis becoming eggs. We analyzed polyadenylation in vitro in oocyte and egg extracts. In vivo, polyadenylation during maturation requires AAUAAA and a U-rich element. The same sequences are required for polyadenylation in egg extracts in vitro. The in vitro reaction requires at least two separable components: a poly(A) polymerase and an RNA binding activity with specificity for AAUAAA and the U-rich element. The poly(A) polymerase is similar to nuclear poly(A) polymerases in mammalian cells. Through a 2000-fold partial purification, the frog egg and mammalian enzymes were found to be very similar. More importantly, a purified calf thymus poly(A) polymerase acquired the sequence specificity seen during frog oocyte maturation when mixed with the frog egg RNA binding fraction, demonstrating the interchangeability of the two enzymes. To determine how polyadenylation is activated during maturation, we compared polymerase and RNA binding activities in oocyte and egg extracts. Although oocyte extracts were much less active in maturation-specific polyadenylation, they contained nearly as much poly(A) polymerase activity. In contrast, the RNA binding activity differed dramatically in oocyte and egg extracts: oocyte extracts contained less binding activity and the activity that was present exhibited an altered mobility in gel retardation assays. Finally, we demonstrate that components present in the RNA binding fraction are rate-limiting in the oocyte extract, suggesting that fraction contains the target that is activated by progesterone treatment. This target may be the RNA binding activity itself. We propose that in spite of the many biological differences between them, nuclear polyadenylation and cytoplasmic polyadenylation during early development may be catalyzed by similar, or even identical, components.     

mRNA degradation. A tale of poly(A) and multiprotein machines

The Escherichia coli RNA degradosome is a multiprotein complex containing an endoribonuclease, polynucleotide phosphorylase and a DEAD-box RNA helicase. A related complex has been described in the spinach chloroplast. The exosome and the mtEXO complex have recently been described in yeast and it is likely that related complexes also exist in animal cells. This research suggests the widespread existence of sophisticated machines for the efficient degradation of messenger RNA. The DEAD-box helicase in the degradosome can unwind regions of RNA structure that interfere with 3'-5' degradation. The polyadenylation of RNA 3' ends is also known to promote degradation by creating a 'toehold' for the degradation machinery. Much remains to be learned about the regulation of mRNA stability. The complexity of the degradation process, both in the eubacteria and in the eukaryotes, suggests that many steps are possible points of control.     

Poly(A) polymerase activity in ethionine-intoxicated rats: the relative effectiveness of disaggregated and intact polyribosomes as primers for poly(A) polymerase

Ethionine intoxication causes a change in the metabolism of poly(A) sequences on the 3' OH terminus of mRNA in rat liver in vivo. In an attempt to determine the factors responsible for these changes, nuclear and cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase activities and the state of the primer were examined in vitro. Requirements for optimal enzyme activities were determined. The nuclear and cytoplasmic enzymes had different K+, Mn2+, and poly(A) primer optima. The levels of nuclear and cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase activity were shown to decrease following ethionine intoxication. Poly(A)+ RNA isolated from the livers of saline- and ethionine-treated rats served equally well as primers for the cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase.Disaggregated polysomes were seven times more effective as primers than were intact polysomes. The results suggest that the mRNP particle which is released from polysomes as a result of ethionine intoxication functions better as a poly(A) polymerase primer than does the intact polysome.     

Translational control by the poly(A) binding protein: a check for mRNA integrity

The eukaryotic mRNA 3' poly(A) tail and the 5' cap cooperate to synergistically enhance translation. This interaction is mediated by a ribonucleoprotein network that contains, at a minimum, the poly(A) binding protein (PABP), the capbinding protein eIF4E and a scaffolding protein, eIF4G. eIF4G, in turn, contains binding sites for eIF4A and eIF3, a 40S ribosome-associated initiation factor. The combined cooperative interactions within this "closed loop" mRNP among other effects enhance the affinity of eIF4E for the 5' cap by lowering its dissociation rate and, ultimately, facilitate the formation of 48S and 80S ribosome initiation complexes. The PABP-poly(A) interaction also stimulates initiation driven by picomavirus' internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs), a process that requires eIF4G but not eIF4E. PABP, therefore, should be considered a canonical initiation factor, integral to initiation complex formation. Poly(A)-mediated translation is subjected to regulation by the PABP-interacting proteins Paip1 and Paip2. Paip1 acts as a translational enhancer. In contrast, Paip2 strongly inhibits translation by promoting dissociation of PABP from poly(A) and by competing with eIF4G for binding to PABP.     

HeLa cell cytoplasmic mRNA contains three classes of sequences: predominantly poly(A)-free, predominantly poly(A)-containing and bimorphic

The mRNA species which exist in the HeLa cell polyribisomes in a form devoid of A sequences longer than 8 nucleotides constitute the poly(A)-free class of mRNA. The rapidly labelled component of this mRNA class shares no measurable sequence homology with poly(A)-containing RNA. If poly(A)-free mRNA larger than 12 S labelled for 2 h in vivo is hybridized with total cellular DNA, it hybridizes primarily with single-copy DNA. When a large excess of steady poly(A)-containing RNA is added before hybridization of labelled poly(A)-free RNA, no inhibition of hybridization occurs. This indicates the existence of a class of poly(A)-free mRNA with no poly(A)-containing counterpart. Some mRNA species can exist solely as poly(A)-containing mRNAs. These mRNAs in HeLa cells are found almost exclusively in the mRNA species present only a few times per cell (scarce sequences). Some mRNA species can exist in two forms, poly(A)containing and lacking, as evidenced by the translation data in vitro of Kaufmann et al. [Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 4801--4805 (1977)]. In addition, if cDNA to total poly(A)-containing mRNA is fractionated into abundant and scarce classes, 47% of the scarce class cDNA can be readily hybridized with poly(A)-free mRNA. 10% of the abundant cDNA to poly(A)-containing mRNA will hybridize with poly(A)-free sequences very rapidly while the other 90% hybridize 160 times more slowly, indicating two very different frequency distributions. The cytoplasmic metabolism of these three distinct mRNA classes is discussed.     

Rrp6p controls mRNA poly(A) tail length and its decoration with poly(A) binding proteins

Poly(A) (pA) tail binding proteins (PABPs) control mRNA polyadenylation, stability, and translation. In a purified system, S. cerevisiae PABPs, Pab1p and Nab2p, are individually sufficient to provide normal pA tail length. However, it is unknown how this occurs in more complex environments. Here we find that the nuclear exosome subunit Rrp6p counteracts the in vitro and in vivo extension of mature pA tails by the noncanonical pA polymerase Trf4p. Moreover, PABP loading onto nascent pA tails is controlled by Rrp6p; while Pab1p is the major PABP, Nab2p only associates in the absence of Rrp6p. This is because Rrp6p can interact with Nab2p and displace it from pA tails, potentially leading to RNA turnover, as evidenced for certain pre-mRNAs. We suggest that a nuclear mRNP surveillance step involves targeting of Rrp6p by Nab2p-bound pA-tailed RNPs and that pre-mRNA abundance is regulated at this level.     

The metabolism of a poly(A) minus mRNA fraction in HeLa cells

About 30% of HeLa cell mRNA lacks poly(A) when labeled in the presence of different rRNA inhibitors. Our method of RNA fractionation precludes contamination of the poly(A)^? mRNA with large amounts of poly(A)⁺ sequences. The poly(A)^? species is associated with polyribosomes, has an average sedimentation value equal to or greater than poly(A)⁺ mRNA, and behaves like the poly(A)⁺ mRNA in its sensitivity to EDTA and puromycin release from polyribosomes. There is very little, if any, hybridization at Rot values characteristic of abundant RNA sequences between the poly(A)^? RNA fractions from total cytoplasm or from polyribosomes and ³H-cDNA made to poly(A)⁺ RNA. This indicates that poly(A)^? mRNA does not arise from poly(A)⁺ mRNA by nonadenylation, deadenylation, or degradation of random abundant mRNA sequences. The rate of accumulation of poly(A)^? mRNA larger than 9S in the cytoplasm parallels the accumulation of poly(A)^? mRNA. The poly(A)^? mRNA is maintained as approximately 30% of the total labeled mRNA in a short (90 min) and in a long (20 hr) time period. These data indicate that poly(A)^? mRNA is not short-lived nuclear or cytoplasmic heterogeneous RNA contamination, and that the half-life of the poly(A)^? mRNA may parallel that of the poly(A)⁺ mRNA. Cordycepin appears to almost completely (95%) inhibit poly(A)⁺ mRNA while only partially (60%) inhibiting the poly(A)^? mRNA. The origin of the cordycepin-insensitive mRNA has not been ascertained.