Auxiliary phase guidelines for microbial biotransformations of toxic substrate into toxic product

When an industrial process is developed using the microbial transformation of a precursor into a desired chemical compound, high concentrations of substrate and product will be involved. These compounds may become toxic to the cells. In situ product removal (ISPR) may be carried out, using auxiliary phases such as extractants or adsorbents. Simultaneously, in situ substrate addition (ISSA) may be performed. It is shown that for uncharged substrates and products, the aqueous solubilities of substrate and product can be used to predict if ISPR might be required. When a particular auxiliary phase is selected and the distribution coefficients of substrate and product are known, it is possible to estimate a priori if this auxiliary phase might be good enough and how much of it might be needed for an efficient (fed-)batch biotransformation process. For biotransformation products of intermediate polarity (aqueous solubility of about 1-10 g/L) there seems to be a lack of extractants and adsorbents with the capacity to raise the product concentrations to commercially more interesting levels.     

The toxic origins of disease

Researchers say that endocrine-disrupting chemicals can permanently damage the developing organism and may even promote obesity. But the chemical industry doesn't want you to believe them.     

Distant effects of toxic agents

Toxic solutions applied at one end of a Nitella cell 6 cm. long may produce little or no visible change in the structure of the protoplasm at the place of application but if the opposite end is covered with water its protoplasm soon disintegrates. If the middle of the cell is covered with mineral oil this region remains normal in appearance for half an hour or more. The result is due to the movement of substances in the cell. The loss of substances at the end where the toxic agent is applied results in loss at the opposite end if it is covered with water since water enters and travels along inside the cell carrying substances with it. This causes injury at the spot where the water enters. The conception developed here differs fundamentally from the usual view that the effects of injury spread gradually from the region where the toxic agent is applied to the immediately adjoining regions and thence to more remote places. The change produced by loss of substances produces an interesting pattern which deserves study.     

Toxicogenomics and toxic torts

One of the first practical applications of toxicogenomics will probably be in the context of toxic tort personal injury litigation. Gene expression changes that'fingerprint' exposure to particular classes of toxic substances can potentially be used to demonstrate exposure, prove causation and support novel damage claims in lawsuits brought by citizens injured by toxic exposures. Although the potential use of toxicogenomic data in toxic tort litigation is immense, there is a danger of premature use of such data before they have been adequately validated and characterized.     

Studies on toxic action

Summary The toxicity of eight normal aliphatic alcohols towards potato tuber tissue has been compared by following the rate of exosmosis of electrolytes into solutions of each of the alcohols of various concentrations. Solutions are regarded as equi-toxic which bring about the same rate of exosmosis under the same conditions. With each increase of one carbon atom in the carbon chain the toxicity of the alcohol is increased from 2·25 to about 4·7 times. Normal octyl alcohol is thus more than 2,000 times as toxic as methyl alcohol. The extent of agreement of these results with the theories ofTraube andCzapek is indicated.     

Some like it toxic

Humans are notorious for disturbing terrestrial ecosystems worldwide, especially those that are in close proximity to urban areas. This disturbance has involved the accumulation of various types of chemical pollutants, of either agricultural or industrial origins, in both soil and water ecosystems. Pollutants have sometimes included essential plant nutrients, such as phosphate and nitrate, which have piled up throughout the years in many ecosystems as a consequence of aggressive agricultural practices, and a number of toxic or trace metals, e.g. iron, nickel or zinc that are important at low levels for the fitness of living organisms, but otherwise toxic at high concentrations ( Ker & Charest 2010 ; Audet & Charest 2008 ). In order to reduce the load of toxic elements, scientists have used the natural capacity of several plant species to sequestrate them from the soil and, ultimately, render them harmless. This process, called phytoremediation, is rather slow, as most plants take years to build up their biomass but has been shown to be ‘boostable’ under experimental conditions in the presence of a particular group of plant symbionts in the soil – the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) ( Gohre & Paszkowski 2006 ). These latter organisms are now widely recognized as being very beneficial for purposes of phytoremediation, but their biodiversity in the most disturbed ecosystems is still virtually unknown. Are these fungi really abundant in heavily polluted soils, or are their communities shrunken down like those of other microorganisms in the presence of heavy pollution? In this issue of Molecular Ecology, the study by Hassan et al. (2011) provides answers to these specific questions by determining the extent of AMF biodiversity across several urbanized areas in the City of Montréal.     

On toxic effects of scientific journals

The advent of online publishing greatly facilitates the dissemination of scientific results. This revolution might have led to the untimely death of many traditional publishing companies, since today’s scientists are perfectly capable of writing, formatting and uploading files to appropriate websites that can be consulted by colleagues and the general public alike. They also have the intellectual resources to criticize each other and organize an anonymous peer review system. The Open Access approach appears promising in this respect, but we cannot ignore that it is fraught with editorial and economic problems. A few powerful publishing companies not only managed to survive, but also rake up considerable profits. Moreover, they succeeded in becoming influential ‘trendsetters’ since they decide which papers deserve to be published. To make money, one must set novel trends, like Christian Dior or Levi’s in fashion, and open new markets, for example in Asia. In doing so, the publishers tend to supplant both national and transnational funding agencies in defining science policy. In many cases, these agencies tend simply to adopt the commercial criteria defined by the journals, forever eager to improve their impact factors. It is not obvious that the publishers of scientific journals, the editorial boards that they appoint, or the people who sift through the vast numbers of papers submitted to a handful of ‘top’ journals are endowed with sufficient insight to set the trends of future science. It seems even less obvious that funding agencies should blindly follow the fashion trends set by the publishers. The perverse relationships between private publishers and public funding agencies may have a toxic effect on science policy.