Prediction of protein-protein interactions: unifying evolution and structure at protein interfaces

The vast majority of the chores in the living cell involve protein-protein interactions. Providing details of protein interactions at the residue level and incorporating them into protein interaction networks are crucial toward the elucidation of a dynamic picture of cells. Despite the rapid increase in the number of structurally known protein complexes, we are still far away from a complete network. Given experimental limitations, computational modeling of protein interactions is a prerequisite to proceed on the way to complete structural networks. In this work, we focus on the question 'how do proteins interact?' rather than 'which proteins interact?' and we review structure-based protein-protein interaction prediction approaches. As a sample approach for modeling protein interactions, PRISM is detailed which combines structural similarity and evolutionary conservation in protein interfaces to infer structures of complexes in the protein interaction network. This will ultimately help us to understand the role of protein interfaces in predicting bound conformations.     

Data-driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes

With the amount of genetic information available, a lot of attention has focused on systems biology, in particular biomolecular interactions. Considering the huge number of such interactions, and their often weak and transient nature, conventional experimental methods such as X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy are not sufficient to gain structural insight into these. A wealth of biochemical and/or biophysical data can, however, readily be obtained for biomolecular complexes. Combining these data with docking (the process of modeling the 3D structure of a complex from its known constituents) should provide valuable structural information and complement the classical structural methods. In this review we discuss and illustrate the various sources of data that can be used to map interactions and their combination with docking methods to generate structural models of the complexes. Finally a perspective on the future of this kind of approach is given.     

Enriching the human apoptosis pathway by predicting the structures of protein-protein complexes

Apoptosis is a matter of life and death for cells and both inhibited and enhanced apoptosis may be involved in the pathogenesis of human diseases. The structures of protein-protein complexes in the apoptosis signaling pathway are important as the structural pathway helps in understanding the mechanism of the regulation and information transfer, and in identifying targets for drug design. Here, we aim to predict the structures toward a more informative pathway than currently available. Based on the 3D structures of complexes in the target pathway and a protein-protein interaction modeling tool which allows accurate and proteome-scale applications, we modeled the structures of 29 interactions, 21 of which were previously unknown. Next, 27 interactions which were not listed in the KEGG apoptosis pathway were predicted and subsequently validated by the experimental data in the literature. Additional interactions are also predicted. The multi-partner hub proteins are analyzed and interactions that can and cannot co-exist are identified. Overall, our results enrich the understanding of the pathway with interactions and provide structural details for the human apoptosis pathway. They also illustrate that computational modeling of protein-protein interactions on a large scale can help validate experimental data and provide accurate, structural atom-level detail of signaling pathways in the human cell.     

Combinations of protein-chemical complex structures reveal new targets for established drugs

Biological networks are powerful tools for predicting undocumented relationships between molecules. The underlying principle is that existing interactions between molecules can be used to predict new interactions. Here we use this principle to suggest new protein-chemical interactions via the network derived from three-dimensional structures. For pairs of proteins sharing a common ligand, we use protein and chemical superimpositions combined with fast structural compatibility screens to predict whether additional compounds bound by one protein would bind the other. The method reproduces 84% of complexes in a benchmark, and we make many predictions that would not be possible using conventional modeling techniques. Within 19,578 novel predicted interactions are 7,793 involving 718 drugs, including filaminast, coumarin, alitretonin and erlotinib. The growth rate of confident predictions is twice that of experimental complexes, meaning that a complete structural drug-protein repertoire will be available at least ten years earlier than by X-ray and NMR techniques alone.     

Isotope-edited proton NMR study on the structure of a pepsin/inhibitor complex

A general approach is illustrated for providing detailed structural information on large enzyme/inhibitor complexes using NMR spectroscopy. The method involves the use of isotopically labeled ligands to simplify two-dimensional NOE spectra of large molecular complexes by isotope-editing techniques. With this approach, the backbone and side-chain conformations (at the P2 and P3 sites) of a tightly bound inhibitor of porcine pepsin have been determined. In addition, structural information on the active site of pepsin has been obtained. Due to the sequence homology between porcine pepsin and human renin, this structural information may prove useful for modeling renin/inhibitor complexes with the ultimate goal of designing more effective renin inhibitors. Moreover, this general approach can be applied to study other biological systems of interest such as other enzyme/inhibitor complexes, ligands bound to soluble receptors, and enzyme/substrate interactions.     

GWYRE: A Resource for Mapping Variants onto Experimental and Modeled Structures of Human Protein Complexes

Rapid progress in structural modeling of proteins and their interactions is powered by advances in knowledge-based methodologies along with better understanding of physical principles of protein structure and function. The pool of structural data for modeling of proteins and protein–protein complexes is constantly increasing due to the rapid growth of protein interaction databases and Protein Data Bank. The GWYRE (Genome Wide PhYRE) project capitalizes on these developments by advancing and applying new powerful modeling methodologies to structural modeling of protein–protein interactions and genetic variation. The methods integrate knowledge-based tertiary structure prediction using Phyre2 and quaternary structure prediction using template-based docking by a full-structure alignment protocol to generate models for binary complexes. The predictions are incorporated in a comprehensive public resource for structural characterization of the human interactome and the location of human genetic variants. The GWYRE resource facilitates better understanding of principles of protein interaction and structure/function relationships. The resource is available at http://www.gwyre.org.     

Structural view of glycosaminoglycan-protein interactions

The essential role of protein-glycosaminoglycan interactions in the regulation of various physiological processes has been recognized for several decades but it is only recently that the molecular basis underlying such interactions has emerged. The different methodologies to elucidate the three-dimensional features of glycosaminoglycans along with the interactions with proteins cover high resolution NMR spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, molecular modeling, and hydrodynamic measurements. The structural results that have accumulated have been organized in databases that allow rapid searching with entries related either to the type of glycosaminoglycan or the type of protein. Finally, three selected examples enlightening the complexity of the nature of the interactions occurring between proteins and glycosaminoglycans are given. The example of interactions between heparin and antithrombin III illustrates how such a complex mechanism as the regulation of blood coagulation by a specific pentasaccharide can be dissected through the combined use of dedicated carbohydrate chemistry and structural glycobiology. The second example deals with the study of complexes between chemokines and heparin, and shows how multimolecular complexes of proteins can be organized in space throughout the action of glycosaminoglycans. Again, the synthesis of chemical mimetics offers an unexpected route to the development of novel glycotherapeutics. Finally, the area of enzymes/glycosaminoglycans complexes is briefly covered to realize the limited knowledge that we have for such an important class of biomacromolecular complexes.     

小角X-射线散射法解析多结构域蛋白质或复合物的溶液结构

随着同步辐射装置的建设与发展及各种建模方法的产生与完善,小角X-射线散射（small angle X-ray scattering,SAXS）法已经逐渐成为结构生物学中的一种重要的工具。SAXS可以用于研究溶液中生物大分子的结构及构象变化,蛋白质的组装、折叠等动态过程。本文对SAXS的基本原理、常用的研究技术和建模方法及其应用进行了综述。     

Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins

Protein docking is essential for structural characterization of protein interactions. Besides providing the structure of protein complexes, modeling of proteins and their complexes is important for understanding the fundamental principles and specific aspects of protein interactions. The accuracy of protein modeling, in general, is still less than that of the experimental approaches. Thus, it is important to investigate the applicability of docking techniques to modeled proteins. We present new comprehensive benchmark sets of protein models for the development and validation of protein docking, as well as a systematic assessment of free and template-based docking techniques on these sets. As opposed to previous studies, the benchmark sets reflect the real case modeling/docking scenario where the accuracy of the models is assessed by the modeling procedure, without reference to the native structure (which would be unknown in practical applications). We also expanded the analysis to include docking of protein pairs where proteins have different structural accuracy. The results show that, in general, the template-based docking is less sensitive to the structural inaccuracies of the models than the free docking. The near-native docking poses generated by the template-based approach, typically, also have higher ranks than those produces by the free docking (although the free docking is indispensable in modeling the multiplicity of protein interactions in a crowded cellular environment). The results show that docking techniques are applicable to protein models in a broad range of modeling accuracy. The study provides clear guidelines for practical applications of docking to protein models.     

Structural quality of unrefined models in protein docking

Structural characterization of protein‐protein interactions is essential for understanding life processes at the molecular level. However, only a fraction of protein interactions have experimentally resolved structures. Thus, reliable computational methods for structural modeling of protein interactions (protein docking) are important for generating such structures and understanding the principles of protein recognition. Template‐based docking techniques that utilize structural similarity between target protein‐protein interaction and cocrystallized protein‐protein complexes (templates) are gaining popularity due to generally higher reliability than that of the template‐free docking. However, the template‐based approach lacks explicit penalties for intermolecular penetration, as opposed to the typical free docking where such penalty is inherent due to the shape complementarity paradigm. Thus, template‐based docking models are commonly assumed to require special treatment to remove large structural penetrations. In this study, we compared clashes in the template‐based and free docking of the same proteins, with crystallographically determined and modeled structures. The results show that for the less accurate protein models, free docking produces fewer clashes than the template‐based approach. However, contrary to the common expectation, in acceptable and better quality docking models of unbound crystallographically determined proteins, the clashes in the template‐based docking are comparable to those in the free docking, due to the overall higher quality of the template‐based docking predictions. This suggests that the free docking refinement protocols can in principle be applied to the template‐based docking predictions as well. Proteins 2016; 85:39–45. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Combinatorial docking approach for structure prediction of large proteins and multi-molecular assemblies

Protein folding and protein binding are similar processes. In both, structural units combinatorially associate with each other. In the case of folding, we mostly handle relatively small units, building blocks or domains, that are covalently linked. In the case of multi-molecular binding, the subunits are relatively large and are associated only by non-covalent bonds. Experimentally, the difficulty in the determination of the structures of such large assemblies increases with the complex size and the number of components it contains. Computationally, the prediction of the structures of multi-molecular complexes has largely not been addressed, probably owing to the magnitude of the combinatorial complexity of the problem. Current docking algorithms mostly target prediction of pairwise interactions. Here our goal is to predict the structures of multi-unit associations, whether these are chain-connected as in protein folding, or separate disjoint molecules in the assemblies. We assume that the structures of the single units are known, either through experimental determination or modeling. Our aim is to combinatorially assemble these units to predict their structure. To address this problem we have developed CombDock. CombDock is a combinatorial docking algorithm for the structural units assembly problem. Below, we briefly describe the algorithm and present examples of its various applications to folding and to multi-molecular assemblies. To test the robustness of the algorithm, we use inaccurate models of the structural units, derived either from crystal structures of unbound molecules or from modeling of the target sequences. The algorithm has been able to predict near-native arrangements of the input structural units in almost all of the cases, suggesting that a combinatorial approach can overcome the imperfect shape complementarity caused by the inaccuracy of the models. In addition, we further show that through a combinatorial docking strategy it is possible to enhance the predictions of pairwise interactions involved in a multi-molecular assembly.     

Integrative Structural Biology in the Era of Accurate Structure Prediction

Characterizing the three-dimensional structure of macromolecules is central to understanding their function. Traditionally, structures of proteins and their complexes have been determined using experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography, NMR, or cryo-electron microscopy—applied individually or in an integrative manner. Meanwhile, however, computational methods for protein structure prediction have been improving their accuracy, gradually, then suddenly, with the breakthrough advance by AlphaFold2, whose models of monomeric proteins are often as accurate as experimental structures. This breakthrough foreshadows a new era of computational methods that can build accurate models for most monomeric proteins. Here, we envision how such accurate modeling methods can combine with experimental structural biology techniques, enhancing integrative structural biology. We highlight the challenges that arise when considering multiple structural conformations, protein complexes, and polymorphic assemblies. These challenges will motivate further developments, both in modeling programs and in methods to solve experimental structures, towards better and quicker investigation of structure–function relationships.     

Structural modeling of protein complexes: Current capabilities and challenges

Proteins frequently interact with each other, and the knowledge of structures of the corresponding protein complexes is necessary to understand how they function. Computational methods are increasingly used to provide structural models of protein complexes. Not surprisingly, community-wide Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) experiments have recently started monitoring the progress in this research area. We participated in CASP13 with the aim to evaluate our current capabilities in modeling of protein complexes and to gain a better understanding of factors that exert the largest impact on these capabilities. To model protein complexes in CASP13, we applied template-based modeling, free docking and hybrid techniques that enabled us to generate models of the topmost quality for 27 of 42 multimers. If templates for protein complexes could be identified, we modeled the structures with reasonable accuracy by straightforward homology modeling. If only partial templates were available, it was nevertheless possible to predict the interaction interfaces correctly or to generate acceptable models for protein complexes by combining template-based modeling with docking. If no templates were available, we used rigid-body docking with limited success. However, in some free docking models, despite the incorrect subunit orientation and missed interface contacts, the approximate location of protein binding sites was identified correctly. Apparently, our overall performance in docking was limited by the quality of monomer models and by the imperfection of scoring methods. The impact of human intervention on our results in modeling of protein complexes was significant indicating the need for improvements of automatic methods.     

Statistically inferring protein-protein associations with affinity isolation LC-MS/MS assays

Affinity isolation of protein complexes followed by protein identification by LC-MS/MS is an increasingly popular approach for mapping protein interactions. However, systematic and random assay errors from multiple sources must be considered to confidently infer authentic protein-protein interactions. To address this issue, we developed a general, robust statistical method for inferring authentic interactions from protein prey-by-bait frequency tables using a binomial-based likelihood ratio test (LRT) coupled with Bayes' Odds estimation. We then applied our LRT-Bayes' algorithm experimentally using data from protein complexes isolated from Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Our algorithm, in conjunction with the experimental protocol, inferred with high confidence authentic interacting proteins from abundant, stable complexes, but few or no authentic interactions for lower-abundance complexes. The algorithm can discriminate against a background of prey proteins that are detected in association with a large number of baits as an artifact of the measurement. We conclude that the experimental protocol including the LRT-Bayes' algorithm produces results with high confidence but moderate sensitivity. We also found that Monte Carlo simulation is a feasible tool for checking modeling assumptions, estimating parameters, and evaluating the significance of results in protein association studies.     

Template-based modeling of diverse protein interactions in CAPRI rounds 38-45

Structures of proteins complexed with other proteins, peptides, or ligands are essential for investigation of molecular mechanisms. However, the experimental structures of protein complexes of interest are often not available. Therefore, computational methods are widely used to predict these structures, and, of those methods, template-based modeling is the most successful. In the rounds 38-45 of the Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI), we applied template-based modeling for 9 of 11 protein-protein and protein-peptide interaction targets, resulting in medium and high-quality models for six targets. For the protein-oligosaccharide docking targets, we used constraints derived from template structures, and generated models of at least acceptable quality for most of the targets. Apparently, high flexibility of oligosaccharide molecules was the main cause preventing us from obtaining models of higher quality. We also participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge, the goal of which was to identify the highest quality models from a large pool of decoys. In this experiment, we tested VoroMQA, a scoring method based on interatomic contact areas. The results showed VoroMQA to be quite effective in scoring strongly binding and obligatory protein complexes, but less successful in the case of transient interactions. We extensively used manual intervention in both CAPRI modeling and scoring experiments. This oftentimes allowed us to select the correct templates from available alternatives and to limit the search space during the model scoring.     

蛋白质复合体及蛋白质相互作用研究新策略—化学交联结合质谱分析法

近年来化学交联法结合质谱分析法被广泛用于蛋白质复合体结构及蛋白质相互作用的研究。研究表明这两种方法的有机结合为研究蛋白质复合体结构及蛋白质相互作用提供了一条新的途径。文章对不同类型的化学交联剂、质谱分析中的Bottom-up 与Top-down 两种研究策略,以及化学交联法结合质谱分析法在蛋白质复合体结构、蛋白质相互作用研究中的应用进行综述。这两种方法的不断发展与完善,将会极大促进生物大分子复合体结构及蛋白质相互作用的研究。