Do beef cattle react consistently to different handling situations?

Beef cattle responses to handling depend partly on the genetic characteristics of the animals. However, the various methods used in order to assess these responses differ to a great extent. The purpose of this work is to study the relationship between two different situations extensively used to evaluate cattle reactions to handling. Moreover, the genetic variability of cattle responses to these two handling situations was investigated. Behavioural reactions of 245 Limousine heifers, from 10 sires, were evaluated both in a docility test and in a crush test. In the docility test, a human tried to lead and then to maintain the animal in the corner of a pen during 30 consecutive seconds, with a maximum duration of the test of 3.5min. A docility score summarised the animal's behavioural reactions to the test. The crush test procedure consisted of social isolation of the animal in a crush, with the head maintained in a head gate (5min), then exposure to a stationary human (30s), and finally stroking on the forehead (30s). An agitation index for each part of this test was computed from PCA analyses based on agitation behaviours. Sire effect was significant for every part of both tests (P<0.05). Heifers' behavioural responses to the docility test were significantly correlated with their responses to the crush test, when the animals were in isolation (r=0.29; P<0.001), when the human stood motionless in front of the animals (r=0.37; P<0.001), and when the human stroked them (r=0.28; P<0.001). Sires' behavioural reactions to the docility test (computed from their daughters' scores) were correlated with their reactions to the crush test only when the human was present, both when motionless (r=0.88; P<0.001) and when stroking the heifer (r=0.81; P<0.05). No relationship appeared between sires' behavioural reactions to the docility test and their responses to restraint in the crush when the human was absent (P=0.17). Furthermore, the crush test did not reveal the animals which presented aggressive reactions to handling in the docility test. The results exposed in this paper pointed out the existence of a general reactivity of beef cattle to handling, whether the animals are restrained or not, which appears influenced by the sire. Such reactivity is suggested to be mainly a consequence of the animals reactions to humans. The human environment needs to be precisely defined in the handling test procedures before using them as a selection criteria.     

The effect of early human contact and the separation method from the dam on responses of beef calves to humans

The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the effect of early human contact and of the separation method from the dam on the future relationships of calves with humans, and to investigate the relationship between dam responses and calf responses. Thirty-three Salers calves aged 2–4 days old and reared outdoors were split into 3-week treatments balanced according to sex and birth dates. Group 1 (long separation from the dam and human contact: LS + H; n = 11) underwent 8 h of separation from the dam per day and 5 min of individual stroking; group 2 (short separation from the dam and human contact: SS + H; n = 11) underwent 1 h of separation and the same amount of human contact as LS + H calves. Group 3 (short separation from the dam and no human contact: SS − H; n = 11) was a control group undergoing the same duration of separation as SS + H but without stroking. At 3, 15 and 45 weeks of age, the calves were tested in a standard arena test (AT) where they were successively left alone (2 min), left with a stationary human (5 min), and left with a human approaching and touching them (2 min). At 15 and 45 weeks, the calves were also tested with the standard docility test (DT: test of restraint). The dams were also tested with DT 2 months before calving. Data analysis via Mann–Whitney tests and Spearman's correlations showed no significant effect of the duration calves were separated from their dams. Just after treatment at 3-week of age, calves given stroking (LS + H and SS + H) were more motionless and more willing to accept human contact (AT: touching) than control calves (SS − H, P < 0.01). At 45 weeks of age, calves given stroking spent also significantly more time (P < 0.05) motionless with the approaching human compared to non-stroked calves (SS − H), suggesting a persistent effect. However, this effect was not reproduced on the other behavioural criteria recorded (e.g., duration of human contact or docility score). In the different tests and at the different ages, the docility scores of the dams were significantly correlated (up to 0.7, P < 0.01) with behaviour towards humans shown by stroked calves but not non-stroked calves (SS − H). Our results suggest that additional human contact at early age, but not duration of the separation from the dam, could be beneficial for the human–animal relationship, but only for calves born to docile dams.     

Reactions of calves to handling depend on housing condition and previous experience with humans

This study investigated the influence of stockperson's behaviour and housing conditions on calves' behavioural reactions to people, and behavioural and physiological reactions to handling and short transport. Sixty-four Finnish Ayrshire male calves were used; half of them were housed in individual pens, the other half were housed in group pens of two calves. In both housing conditions half of the calves received minimal contact from the stockperson, while the other half were stroked on their necks and shoulders for 90s a day, after milk meals. The effects of housing and contact with the stockperson on the responses of calves to people, either entering or approaching the pen, were studied. Furthermore, calves' behavioural and physiological (cortisol, heart rate) reactions to being loaded onto a truck, transported for 30min and unloaded were observed. When a person entered the home pen, calves housed by pairs took significantly more time to interact and interacted less frequently with the person than individually housed calves did (p<0.01). Calves that received additional contact interacted for longer time with the unfamiliar person than calves with minimal contact (p=0.02). When a person approached the front of the calves' pens, less withdrawal responses were shown by calves that had received additional contact (p<0.05) than those that had received minimal contact. When the calves were loaded onto the truck, it took more time and effort to load pair housed calves than individually housed calves (p<0.01) and less effort to load calves that had received additional contact (p<0.01) compared to those that had received minimal contact. During loading additional contact calves had lower heart rates (p<0.05) than those that had received minimal contact, while during transport pair housed calves had lower heart rates compared to individually housed ones (p<0.05). For all the observations performed, no interactions were found between housing conditions and human contact.It is concluded that, compared to calves housed individually, calves housed in pairs are less ready to approach humans and less easy to handle. Providing calves with regular positive contacts makes them less fearful of people and improves handling. Due to the greater difficulty in handling calves housed in groups, it is concluded that these animals need to have regular contact with humans.     

Effects of interrupted social contact on the social behaviour of calves and piglets

The use of traditional operant conditioning techniques to assess the behavioural needs of farm animals has been criticised because presenting short rewards repeatedly may interrupt bouts of behaviour and thereby devalue the reward. The two reported experiments (one including 12 calves and one including 12 piglets) aimed to investigate if interruption of social contact affects social behaviour. In both experiments, animals were housed in pairs (one test animal and one companion animal) in large pens with solid sides. The experiment included three periods: a pre-test period, a test period and a post-test period. Animals were separated for 24 h and then reunited for 24 h in each period. In the test period, the first 42 min of contact after reunification comprised 12 successive 3.5 min long periods separated by gaps, whereas in the pre- and post-test periods, the contact was continuous. Calves sniffed and licked each other more when social contact was interrupted (P<0.01), but no effects of interrupting social contact were found for social or locomotor play. In piglets, the test animals performed more flank pushing of the companion (P<0.01), and avoided the companion more (P<0.05), when social contact was interrupted, while no effects of interruption were found for parallel pressing, bites and head knocks, sniffing or locomotor play. The results suggest that if social contact is interrupted in an operant conditioning set up, some elements of aggressive behaviour may be stimulated in piglets.     

The formation of preferential relationships at early age in cattle

Calves can develop long-lasting social relationships with peers. We examined the strength of the relationships between calves according to the time they had been together. Twenty-four female dairy calves were assigned to six groups of four animals (Type-1 partners) at 0.5 month of age. At 3.5 months of age, they were mixed with other calves (Type-2 partners) to form groups of 14. Type-3 partners were calves added to the experimental groups after 5.25 months. The calves stayed together until 1.5 years of age. Social preferences between the three partner types were examined in a Y-maze, and the position and activity of animals in the barn and pasture were followed in three periods. Behavioural synchrony, distance between animals, proximity and nearest neighbour were analysed. The calves more frequently butted Type-3 than Type-1 partners in the Y-maze (P < 0.05). They spent more time in proximity to Type-1 partners, and these were more often the nearest neighbours than other partners (P < 0.001). Synchrony and distance between animals were greater at pasture than in the barn (P < 0.01). Calves seem to form preferential relationships before 3.5 months of age. Keeping cattle together from an early age seems beneficial for them.     

Low potency of intact male rhesus monkeys after long-term visual contact with their female partners

We have examined the possibility that prolonged visual contact between future sexual partners, in the absence of any direct sexual contact and mating activity, is sufficient to produce the familiar-female phenomenon and is associated loss of male potency. For 1 year, 32 intact, feral-reared male rhesus monkeys were housed so that 14 males were in constant visual contact with their four future testing females, and 18 of the males were without any visual contact with females. After 1 year, each male was then tested once with each ovariectomized, estrogen-treated female (128 tests). Males in the group having prolonged prior visual contact (group II) were significantly less potent than males without prior visual contact (group I), and this difference was not related to plasma testosterone levels, prior history, time since capture, or presumed age. Group II males had fewer ejaculations during tests and ejaculated with fewer partners, and this appeared to be because they required significantly more stimulation (mounting and thrusting) to reach ejaculation. The data suggested that the familiar-partner phenomenon was not restricted to the male and was associated with increased social affinity and decreased agonistic tension between partners. Under natural conditions, the phenomenon may encourage troop transfers and outbreeding, and in laboratory studies, prior visual contact between testing partners should be regarded as a potentially uncontrolled source of variation.     

Long-term effects of different handling procedures on behavioural, physiological, and production-related parameters in silver foxes

Fifty-one silver fox vixens, subjected to three different handling treatments as cubs (no-handling, gentle or forced handling), were studied for long-term effects on behavioural, physiological and production-related parameters in a one and a half year period following the last handling session. As juveniles, the animals were exposed to three different behavioural tests at 18, 22, 28, and 32 weeks of age. Both forcibly and gently handled animals showed reduced fear responses compared with nonhandled controls in test situations involving close contact with humans (P < 0.05). The foxes were tested again as adults at 10, 13, 15, and 18 months of age with the same behavioural tests. It was revealed that forcibly handled animals persistently showed reduced fear responses compared with control animals, both in close contact with humans and when exposed to a novel object, whereas gently handled animals only differed from control animals in one of the tests involving some human contact and when exposed to a novel object (P < 0.05). Significant differences between adult gently handled and forcibly handled animals were found in the “confront’ test involving close human contact. In this test more flight responses were observed in the gently handled group than in the forcibly handled group (P < 0.01). Control animals had significantly larger adrenal weights compared with both forcibly handled animals and gently handled animals at 22 months of age (total mean adrenal weight: controls, 0.62 g; gentle, 0.54 g; forced, 0.54 g, P < 0.05, general linear models). Other physiological measures and production-related parameters such as body weight, body size, gastric ulceration and pelt qualities did not differ between treatments (P > 0.05). Early post-weaning handling made foxes less fearful towards humans. Forced handling seemed somewhat superior to gentle handling as a means to produce animals which, in the long term, adapted better to the farm environment both behaviourally and physiologically. Non-handled control animals suffered from long-term stress as reflected by high levels of fear responses and enlarged adrenals. Thus post-weaning handling may be beneficial in the long term for the wellbeing of farmed foxes. When applied as a management routine, handling had no significant influence on later production-related parameters and was not considered an economic risk.     

The role of handling in communication between humans and weanling pigs

This study examined whether regular handling influenced the behavioral response and patterns of the pigs toward a human during the progress of the treatment. Eighteen 4-week-old crossbred weanling pigs from three litters were allotted at random within litters to one of two treatments. The pigs in the handling treatment were individually identified and received regular handling from the experimenter for 15 min, three times per week for 4 weeks. Besides this treatment, the pigs in the handling treatment received brushing for 15 min, once per week for 3 weeks. The pigs in the no-handling treatment had no contact with humans apart from that received during routine husbandry. A catching test was conducted on the pigs in the handling treatment once a week for 4 weeks, and the same test was imposed on the pigs in the no-handling treatment at the start of the experiment. At the end of the experimental period, an experimenter unknown to the pigs conducted the catching test on both treatment groups. The response of the pigs toward the experimenter was classified as either approaching or avoiding behaviors. Specific transitional patterns existed in pigs' physical interaction with a human. During the progression of the handling treatment, the proportion of avoidance behavior significantly (P < 0.05) decreased and the mean aversion score also significantly (P < 0.05) decreased. The variety of physical interactions significantly (P < 0.05) increased. As a consequence, the number of interactions observed in the handling treatment was more than that of the no-handling treatment during the catching test at the end of the experiment. The pigs receiving the regular handling repeatedly tried to make frequent physical contact with the experimenter in spite of repeated chasing and catching events. In conclusion, handling pigs regularly from 4 to 7 weeks of age increases their propensity to approach humans and the variety of their interactions with a human handler, possibly by reducing their fear of humans.     

Comparison of the effects of two different handling methods on the subsequent behaviour of Anglo-Arabian foals toward humans and handling

Tactile contact is often used to improve the human–foal relationship, in particular during sensitive periods such as weaning. However, the method used to provide the contact (forced or unforced) may affect subsequent reactions to humans. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of forced and unforced handling at weaning on horses’ behaviour towards humans and handling.A total of 23 Anglo-Arabian foals received individual human contact at weaning. Constrained-handled foals (forced human contact; FC, n = 8) were stroked while being restrained (i.e., held by the halter without being led) so that human contact was forced. Unconstrained-handled foals (unforced human contact; UC, n = 7) were stroked without any restraint and could thus avoid contact if they so wanted. Each individual was handled 5 min twice a day for 14 consecutive days. Control foals were not handled (no contact; NC, n = 8). Foals’ reactions towards a human (e.g. proximity and contact seeking), and their manageability (fitting of a halter) were then assessed. The animals from the different treatments were then mixed and tested again 4 months later. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to compare experimental groups.Only forced human contact reduced fear reactions toward humans (e.g. shorter latency to approach a passive human, P < 0.01; shorter latency to touch the foal, P < 0.05) in the short-term (immediately after the handling sessions) and increased foals’ manageability in a familiar environment (shorter latency to be placed a halter on and less defences displayed, P < 0.05). It had no effect in an unfamiliar environment. These effects did not last longer than 4 months.Forced human contact thus appears to be more efficient in improving human–horse relationships and subsequent handling than unforced human contact. However, the lack of effect on reactivity towards humans in an unfamiliar environment, and the lack of long-term effects suggest that this method needs to be improved to be more effective. Some of our results suggest that horses could perceive human contact (i.e., stroking) as positive, however further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.     

Effects of early handling on heifers' subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations

The influence of early handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of Friesian heifers to unfamiliar situations and human manipulation was studied. Forty abimals were used. The animals were reared in 4 groups of 10, under standard artificial husbandry conditions. Animals of one group (control animals) were handled only in respect of the demands of normal husbandry. Experimental animals were subjected to additional handling, which consisted of brushing twice a day and leading with a halter. All handled animals received the same amount of handling (30 days) but at different periods in life: 3 days/week from 0 to 3 months of age (Group 0–3); 3 days/week from 6 to 9 months of age (Group 6–9); or 3 days/month from 0 to 9 months of age (Group –9).

When the animals were 15 months old, each heifer, from each treatment group, was tested individually and once only in a set of behavioural tests designed to investigate fearfulness (in the presence or absence of human contact) and the ease with which the animal could be handled.

Animals from Group 0–9, and to a lesser extent those from Group 6–9, were less reactive than controls in tests involving the presence of a human. However, in most cases Group 0–3 animals did not differ significantly from controls. Thus, it would appear that only prolonged handling during early life substantially influences man-animal relationships.

In the fear-eliciting tests, which did not involve human contact, only the responses of Group 0–9 animals differed significantly from those of the controls. It is suggested that temporary prolonged handling influences the expression of fear responses in heifers.     

Association between breeding bulls’ reactivity to humans or handling and their daily behaviour and growth

In beef cattle, reactivity to humans or handling by humans is considered a safety issue for farmers and to impact on productivity. Several testing procedures, associated with potential risks for both humans and animals, have been developed, involving simple human approach, free animals individually handled, or restraint in handling facilities. We investigated how such tests may be related to each other and which dimensions they reveal. Of particular interest is the tolerance towards human approach or handling involving human or chute restraint, and whether they could be linked to the daily activity of animals and their growth, potentially enabling this activity to be used as a proxy for evaluating this reactivity to humans and handing. We observed 498 Limousin breeding bulls, of up to 14 months of age, at a bull testing station during standardised behavioural tests involving humans and handling: human approach at the feed barrier or out of the home pen during individual morphological evaluation, docility test where the experimenter attempts to maintain the bull in the corner of a test pen, and during restraint in a chute for weighing. Routinely collected on farm at approximately 8 months of age, bulls’ reaction scores to human approach were also available. The animals wore MEDRIA collars with 3D-accelerometers that continually monitored their daily activities (ingestion, rumination, rest, etc.). Three 2-week periods spanning 4 months were analysed. We conducted a varimax-rotated principal component analysis (PCA) on behavioural tests: the first component (23.63% of the variability) summarised scores during restraint in the chute, and the second component (19.36% of the variability) summarised avoidance distance score at the feed barrier, score during morphological evaluation, and docility score. The daily activity of the bulls was consistent across the three 2-week periods that were analysed and was not related to the PCA dimensions (P > 0.1). Animals that could be approached at a closer distance reached a heavier weight at the age of 400 days (P < 0.001). In conclusion, within the limits of the test used, breeding bulls’ reactivity to humans or handling comprised at least two dimensions: reactivity to human approach and reactivity to restraint (in the chute); which cannot be predicted from the animal’s daily activity. A bull’s acceptance of being approached by humans was positively related to its growth.     

The effects of blindfolding on behavior and heart rate in beef cattle during restraint

Use of a blindfold or hood during handling and restraint has been suggested for many wild and captive animals. Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of blindfolds on beef cattle during restraint. In Experiment 1, 60 beef heifers, naı̈ve to the restraint facility, were randomly assigned to either visual restriction (blindfold) or no visual restriction (control) and tested daily during a 4-day trial to determine the effects during restraint. Heart rate (HR) was measured via telemetry, during a baseline period prior to treatment and continuously recorded during a 1-min period of restraint, which included some manipulation of the animal. Manipulation was initiated 15 s into the restraint period. Two persons simultaneously approached the animal one on either side, grasped the ears, and touched the neck, sides and rump to simulate normal management tasks. Electronic strain gauges attached to the head gate quantified the animal’s struggle during this procedure. These were used to determine the average and maximum exertion forces upon the head gate during restraint. The association between treatment, sample time (day 0–4), animal weight and the various outcome measures were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation method. Mean HR of heifers did not differ at the end of the treatment (95.04±4.66 bpm ) (P=0.64), but the HR tended to decrease more for blindfolded heifers compared to controls during restraint (average decrease 16.3±3.2 bpm and 14±2.9 bpm, respectively) (P=0.10). The average exertion forces applied by blindfolded heifers against the head gate were 23% lower (P<0.05) during the 1-min period and maximum forces were 28% lower (P<0.01). Heart rate and exertion forces declined over the 4 days for both treatment groups (P<0.001). In Experiment 2, 93 commercial beef calves (average age 92.9±2.0 days) were randomly assigned to either visual restriction (blindfold) (n=46) or no visual restriction (control) (n=47) treatments. Behavioral responses to treatment were quantified by measuring the amount of movement and recording the number of vocalizations while the calves were restrained for 1 min on a calf tilt table. Movement was recorded by an electronic device attached to a weighing platform that held the tilt table. After 30 s of restraint, one experimenter touched the animal’s ear while the other touched the neck, to simulate ear tagging and vaccination. Blindfolded calves moved 44% less than the control group (P<0.01). However, the number of vocalizations that occurred during the 1-min test period did not differ (P>0.05) between treatments. Overall, blindfolding cattle reduced the amount of struggle and tended to lower heart rate. Therefore, blindfolding may be advantageous during the routine invasive procedures commonly performed on cattle.     

Effects of handling aids on calf behavior

Effects of three different handling aids on calf behavior were determined. Group 1 calves were intensively-reared intact Holstein males (mean 180 days old); Group 2, extensively-reared beef-breed females (mean 230 days); Group 3, extensively-reared castrated beef-breed males (mean 253 days). Calves in each group were assigned to one of three handling aid treatments (n=5 per treatment subgroup; total n=45): electric prod (Prod), oar with rattles (Oar), manual urging (Manual). Treatments were applied only as needed to encourage forward movement of calves through the length of a solid-sided semicircular chute system. Number of treatment applications, length of time required to move through the entire chute system, and behavior during movement through the chute were recorded. An approach test was conducted 1 day before and 1 day and 1 week after chute tests to evaluate changes in behavior due to handling aid application. During chute tests, Group 1 Prod calves required the fewest treatment applications (4.9) vs. 23.5 (Oar) or 13.5 (Manual), ran most often (1.40 times) vs. 0.20 times (Manual) or 0.33 times (Oar), and made contact with chute sides most often (1.8 times vs. 0.2 times (Manual) or 0.7 times (Oar), respectively (all P<0.05). Similar trends were observed for calves in Groups 2 and 3. There were no significant differences between behaviors observed during the approach tests conducted before and after handling aid treatments had been imposed. Regardless of treatment, intensively-reared Group 1 calves appeared markedly less fearful of handlers during approach tests compared to extensively-reared calves in Groups 2 and 3, which demonstrated overt attempts to escape from the test facilities. One week after chute tests, 13 of 15 Prod calves from all three groups walked, rushed, or backed >1 m away from the handler when the prod was buzzed but not applied, suggesting that the buzzing sound alone may have sufficed to encourage movement by calves that had previously experienced both the sensation and sound associated with electric prodding.     

Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: Quantifying cow–calf interactions

Understanding animal affiliations has important implications for determining social interactions; an example is maternal interactions within beef production systems. The objective of this study was to test whether contact loggers could be used to identify cow–calf pairs. Fifty-two pairs of Belmont Red cows with calves that were between 1- and 14-days old, were fitted with contact logging devices for 1 week in groups ranging in size from five to nine pairs of cows and calves. The contact logging devices recorded the duration of contacts that were less than 7 m distance between individual animals in the group. There was a highly significant difference in both contact duration and contact frequency between cows and their own calves and cows and all other calves. It is concluded that contact logging devices have the potential to provide useful data on animal affiliations.     

Behavioural Type Affects Space Use in a Wild Population of Crows (Corvus corone)

While personality‐dependent dispersal is well studied, local space use has received surprisingly little attention in this context, despite the multiple consequences on survival and fitness. Regarding the coping style of individuals, recent studies on personality‐dependent space use within a habitat indicate that ‘proactive’ individuals are wider ranging than ‘reactive’ ones. However, such studies are still scarce and cover limited taxonomic diversity, and thus, more research is needed to explore whether this pattern generalises across species. We examined the link between coping style and space use in a population of crows (Corvus corone) freely inhabiting the urban zoo of Vienna, Austria. We used a binary docility rating (struggle during handling vs. no struggle) and a tonic immobility test to quantify individual coping style. Individual space use was quantified as the number of different sites at which each crow was observed, and we controlled for different number of sightings per individual by creating a space use index. Only the binary docility rating showed repeatability over time, and significantly predicted space use. In contrast to previous studies, we found that reactive crows (no struggle during handling) showed wider ranging space use within the study site than proactive individuals (who struggled during handling). The discrepancy from previous results suggests that the relationship between behavioural type and space use may vary between species, potentially reflecting differences in socioecology.     

Effects of Feeding Selenium-Enriched Alfalfa Hay on Immunity and Health of Weaned Beef Calves

Previously, we reported that feeding selenium (Se)-enriched forage improves antibody titers in mature beef cows, and whole-blood Se concentrations and growth rates in weaned beef calves. Our current objective was to test whether beef calves fed Se-enriched alfalfa hay during the transition period between weaning and movement to a feedlot also have improved immune responses and slaughter weights. Recently weaned beef calves (n?=?60) were fed an alfalfa-hay-based diet for 7 weeks, which was harvested from fields fertilized with sodium selenate at 0, 22.5, 45.0, or 89.9 g Se/ha. All calves were immunized with J-5 Escherichia coli bacterin. Serum was collected for antibody titers 2 weeks after the third immunization. Whole-blood neutrophils collected at 6 or 7 weeks were evaluated for total antioxidant potential, bacterial killing activity, and expression of genes associated with selenoproteins and innate immunity. Calves fed the highest versus the lowest level of Se-enriched alfalfa hay had higher antibody titers (P?=?0.02), thioredoxin reductase-2 mRNA levels (P?=?0.07), and a greater neutrophil total antioxidant potential (P?=?0.10), whereas mRNA levels of interleukin-8 receptor (P?=?0.02), l-selectin (P?=?0.07), and thioredoxin reductase-1 (P?=?0.07) were lower. In the feedlot, calves previously fed the highest-Se forage had lower mortality (P?=?0.04) and greater slaughter weights (P?=?0.02). Our results suggest that, in areas with low-forage Se concentrations, feeding beef calves Se-enriched alfalfa hay during the weaning transition period improves vaccination responses and subsequent growth and survival in the feedlot.     

Effect of rearing style on the development of social behaviour in young ravens (Corvus corax)

Early social experiences can affect the development and expression of individual social behaviour throughout life. In particular, early-life social deprivations, notably of parental care, can later have deleterious consequences. We can, therefore, expect rearing procedures such as hand-raising—widely used in ethology and socio-cognitive science—to alter the development of individual social behaviour. We investigated how the rearing style later affected (a) variation in relationship strength among peers and (b) individuals’ patterns of social interactions, in three captive groups of juvenile non-breeders consisting of either parent-raised or hand-raised birds, or a mix of both rearing styles. In the three groups, irrespectively of rearing style: strongest relationships (i.e., higher rates of association and affiliations) primarily emerged among siblings and familiar partners (i.e., non-relatives encountered in early life), and mixed-sex and male–male partners established relationships of similar strength, indicating that the rearing style does not severely affect the quality and structure of relationships in young ravens. However, compared to parent-raised ravens, hand-raised ravens showed higher connectedness, i.e., number of partners with whom they mainly associated and affiliated, but formed on average relationships of lower strength, indicating that social experience in early life is not without consequences on the development of ravens’ patterns of social interaction. The deprivation of parental care associated with the presence of same-age peers during hand-raising seemed to maximize ravens’ propensity to interact with others, indicating that besides parents, interactions with same-age peers matter. Opportunities to interact with, and socially learn from peers, might thus be the key to the acquisition of early social competences in ravens.     

Short- and long-term effects of temporary early cow–calf separation or restricted suckling on well-being and performance in zebu cattle

Information on weaning techniques in the tropics is scarce, particularly regarding the long-term effect of temporary early cow–calf separation or restricted suckling. Therefore, we studied the effects of these two handling practices on well-being and performance at 150 days postpartum in fifteen zebu cow–calf pairs randomly assigned to three treatments. Continuous suckling (CS) where calves remained with their dams from birth to weaning; restricted suckling (RS) calves were allowed to suckle 30 min/day from Day 34 until weaning at Day 150 and kept separated the rest of the time; temporary separation (TS) calves were separated for 72 h from their dams from Day 33 to 36 but remained with their dams the rest of the time. Blood samples and behavioral data were collected on Days 32–36 (1st period) and 149–153 (2nd period). In the 1st period, a greater percentage of RS and TS calves were observed close to the fence line (< 10 m) that separated them from their dams (P < 0.0001) and vocalized more than CS calves (P < 0.0001), while in the 2nd period, RS calves had the highest cortisol concentration and vocalization rate (P < 0.05). Similarly, during the 1st period, a greater percentage of RS and TS cows were observed close to the fence line than CS cows (P < 0.0001), with TS cows vocalizing the most (P = 0.001). In the 2nd period, RS cows had greater cortisol concentration than TS (P = 0.037) and CS cows (P = 0.003). More TS and CS cows than RS were observed close to the fence line (P = 0.03 and P = 0.05). On Day 150, TS calves and cows vocalized more than RS and CS animals (P < 0.0001). Before calf–cow separation, 27 out of 45 cows were cycling (CS = 10; RS = 6; TS = 11). After separation, 12 of the remaining 18 cows resumed ovarian activity (CS = 3; RS = 5; TS = 4), and all cows were cycling after estrous synchronization treatment. The pregnancy rate was similar between CS, RS, and TS (60, 53, and 60% respectively). In conclusion, temporary separation increased calf distress response to definitive weaning even four months later, while restricted suckling seemed to reduce it.     

If You’ve Got It,Flaunt It: Humans Flaunt Attractive Partners to Enhance Their Status and Desirability

Mating decisions are influenced by conspecifics’ mate choices in many species including humans. Recent research has shown that women are more attracted to men with attractive putative partners than those with less attractive partners. We integrate these findings with traditional accounts of social signaling and test five hypotheses derived from it. In our study, 64 men and 75 women were paired with attractive and unattractive opposite-sex putative partners and asked whether they would prefer to give surveys to peers or to older adults. Consistent with predictions, both men and women wanted to show off (flaunt) attractive partners by administering surveys to peers and both men and women wanted to hide (conceal) unattractive partners from peers by administering surveys to older adults. These decisions were mediated by how participants expected others to evaluate their status and desirability when they administered the surveys, consistent with partners serving a social signaling function in humans.     

Effects of Degree and Timing of Social Housing on Reversal Learning and Response to Novel Objects in Dairy Calves

Rodents and primates deprived of early social contact exhibit deficits in learning and behavioural flexibility. They often also exhibit apparent signs of elevated anxiety, although the relationship between these effects has not been studied. To investigate whether dairy calves are similarly affected, we first compared calves housed in standard individual pens (n = 7) to those housed in a dynamic group with access to their mothers (n = 8). All calves learned to approach the correct stimulus in a visual discrimination task. Only one individually housed calf was able to re-learn the task when the stimuli were reversed, compared to all but one calf from the group. A second experiment investigated whether this effect might be explained by anxiety in individually housed animals interfering with their learning, and tested varying degrees of social contact in addition to the complex group: pair housing beginning early (approximately 6 days old) and late (6 weeks old). Again, fewer individually reared calves learned the reversal task (2 of 10 or 20%) compared to early paired and grouped calves (16 of 21 or 76% of calves). Late paired calves had intermediate success. Individually housed calves were slower to touch novel objects, but the magnitude of the fear response did not correlate with reversal performance. We conclude that individually housed calves have learning deficits, but these deficits were not likely associated with increased anxiety.