A Cyclooxygenase-2-dependent Prostaglandin E2 Biosynthetic System in the Golgi Apparatus

Cyclooxygenases (COXs) catalyze the committed step in prostaglandin (PG) biosynthesis. COX-1 is constitutively expressed and stable, whereas COX-2 is inducible and short lived. COX-2 is degraded via endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) following post-translational glycosylation of Asn-594. COX-1 and COX-2 are found in abundance on the luminal surfaces of the ER and inner membrane of the nuclear envelope. Using confocal immunocytofluorescence, we detected both COX-2 and microsomal PGE synthase-1 (mPGES-1) but not COX-1 in the Golgi apparatus. Inhibition of trafficking between the ER and Golgi retarded COX-2 ERAD. COX-2 has a C-terminal STEL sequence, which is an inefficient ER retention signal. Substituting this sequence with KDEL, a robust ER retention signal, concentrated COX-2 in the ER where it was stable and slowly glycosylated on Asn-594. Native COX-2 and a recombinant COX-2 having a Golgi targeting signal but not native COX-1 exhibited efficient catalytic coupling to mPGES-1. We conclude that N-glycosylation of Asn-594 of COX-2 occurs in the ER, leading to anterograde movement of COX-2 to the Golgi where the Asn-594-linked glycan is trimmed prior to retrograde COX-2 transport to the ER for ERAD. Having an inefficient ER retention signal leads to sluggish Golgi to ER transit of COX-2. This permits significant Golgi residence time during which COX-2 can function catalytically. Cytosolic phospholipase A_2α, which mobilizes arachidonic acid for PG synthesis, preferentially translocates to the Golgi in response to physiologic Ca²⁺ mobilization. We propose that cytosolic phospholipase A_2α, COX-2, and mPGES-1 in the Golgi comprise a dedicated system for COX-2-dependent PGE₂ biosynthesis.     

PGE(2) is generated by specific COX-2 activity and increases VEGF production in COX-2-expressing human pancreatic cancer cells

In some cancers cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition appears to be anti-mitogenic and anti-angiogenic, but the actions of COX-derived prostaglandins in pancreatic cancer (PaCa) are unknown. In this study COX-2 was detected in three of six PaCa cell lines while COX-1 was identified in all cell lines. COX-2 expression correlated with basal and arachidonic acid (AA) stimulated PGE(2) production. PGE(2) production was inhibited by the COX-2 inhibitor nimesulide. In COX-2 expressing cells, exogenous AA and PGE(2) increased VEGF synthesis via the EP(2) receptor. Whereas PGE(2) stimulated intracellular cAMP formation in COX-2 positive and negative cells, 8-bromo cAMP stimulated VEGF production only in COX-2 expressing cells. Stimulating COX-2 expressing PaCa cell lines with AA enhanced migration of endothelial cells, an effect which was inhibited by a COX-2 inhibitor and EP(2) receptor antagonist. These data identify a subset of human PaCa cell lines that express functional COX-2 enzyme. PGE(2) generated by specific COX-2 activity increases VEGF secretion in human PaCa cells through an autocrine mechanism.     

Endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol protects neurons by limiting COX-2 elevation

Endocannabinoids are involved in synaptic signaling and neuronal protection; however, our understanding of the mechanisms by which endocannabinoids protect neurons from harmful insults remains elusive. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), the most abundant endogenous cannabinoid and a full agonist for cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), is a substrate for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and can be metabolized by COX-2. Here we show, however, that 2-AG is also capable of suppressing elevation of hippocampal COX-2 expression in response to proinflammatory and excitotoxic stimuli. 2-AG prevents neurodegeneration from toxic assaults that elevate COX-2 expression and inhibits the COX-2 elevation-enhanced excitatory glutamatergic synaptic transmission. The action of 2-AG on suppression of COX-2 appeared to be mediated via the pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein-coupled CB1 receptor and MAPK/NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Our results reveal that 2-AG functions as an endogenous COX-2 inhibitor protecting neurons from harmful insults by preventing excessive expression of COX-2, which provides a mechanistic basis for opening up new therapeutic approaches for protecting neurons from inflammation- and excitotoxicity-induced neurodegeneration.     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of linear phenylethynylbenzenesulfonamide regioisomers as cyclooxygenase-1/-2 (COX-1/-2) inhibitors

A group of regioisomeric phenylethynylbenzenesulfonamides possessing a COX-2 SO2NH2 pharmacophore at the para-, meta- or ortho-position of the C-1 phenyl ring, in conjunction with a C-2 substituted-phenyl (H, OMe, OH, Me, F) group, were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) isozymes. The target 1,2-diphenylacetylenes were synthesized via a palladium-catalyzed Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction. In vitro COX-1/-2 isozyme inhibition structure-activity data showed that COX-1/-2 inhibition and the COX selectivity index (SI) are sensitive to the regioisomeric placement of the COX-2 SO2NH2 pharmacophore where the COX-2 potency order for the benzenesulfonamide regioisomers was generally meta>para and ortho. Among this group of compounds, the in vitro COX-1/-2 isozyme inhibition studies identified 3-(2-phenylethynyl)benzenesulfonamide (10a) as a COX-2 inhibitor (COX-2 IC50=0.45 microM) with a good COX-2 selectivity (COX-2 SI=70). In contrast, 2-[2-(3-fluorophenyl)ethynyl]benzenesulfonamide (11c) possessing a SO2NH2 COX-2 pharmacophore at the ortho-position of the C-1 phenyl ring exhibited COX-1 inhibition and selectivity (COX-1 IC50=3.6 microM). A molecular modeling study where 10a was docked in the binding site of COX-2 shows that the meta-SO2NH2 COX-2 pharmacophore was inserted inside the COX-2 secondary pocket (Arg513, Phe518, Val523, and His90). Similar docking of 10a within the COX-1 binding site shows that the meta-SO2NH2 pharmacophore is unable to interact with the respective amino acid residues in COX-1 that correspond to those near the secondary pocket in COX-2 due to the presence of the larger Ile523 in COX-1 that replaces Val523 in COX-2.     

Novel 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors

A series of novel 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors was prepared via treatment of various diaryl amides with tetrachlorosilane/sodium azide. All compounds were tested in cyclooxygenase (COX) assays in vitro to determine COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory potency and selectivity. Tetrazoles contained a methylsulfonyl or sulfonamide group as COX-2 pharmacophore displayed only low inhibitory potency towards COX-2. Most potent compounds showed IC(50) values of 6 and 7 μM for COX-2. All compounds showed IC(50) values greater 100 μM for COX-1 inhibition.     

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of N-acetyl-2-carboxybenzenesulfonamides: a novel class of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors

N-Acetyl-2-carboxybenzenesulfonamide (11), and a group of analogues possessing an appropriately substituted-phenyl substituent (4-F, 2,4-F(2), 4-SO(2)Me, 4-OCHMe(2)) attached to its C-4, or C-5 position, were synthesized for evaluation as selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. In vitro COX-1/COX-2 inhibition studies showed that 11 is a more potent inhibitor (COX-1 IC(50)=0.06microM; COX-2 IC(50)=0.25microM) than aspirin (COX-1 IC(50)=0.35microM; COX-2 IC(50)=2.4microM), and like aspirin [COX-2 selectivity index (S.I.)=0.14], 11 is a nonselective COX-2 inhibitor (COX-2 S.I.=0.23). Regioisomers having a 2,4-difluorophenyl substituent attached to the C-4 (COX-2 IC(50)=0.087microM; COX-2 S.I. >1149), or C-5 (COX-2 IC(50)=0.77microM, SI>130), position of 11 exhibited the most potent and selective COX-2 inhibitory activity relative to the reference drug celecoxib (COX-1 IC(50)=33.1microM; COX-2 IC(50)=0.07microM; COX-2 S.I.=472). N-Acetyl-2-carboxybenzenesulfonamide (11, ED(50)=49 mg/kg), and its C-4 2,4-difluorophenyl derivative (ED(50)=91 mg/kg), exhibited superior antiinflammatory activity (oral dosing) in a carrageenan-induced rat paw edema assay compared to aspirin (ED(50)=129 mg/kg). These latter compounds exhibited comparable analgesic activity to the reference drug diflunisal, and superior analgesic activity compared to aspirin, in a 4% NaCl-induced abdominal constriction assay. A molecular modeling (docking) study indicated that the SO(2)NHCOCH(3) substituent present in N-acetyl-2-carboxy-4-(2,4-fluorophenyl)benzenesulfonamide, like the acetoxy substituent in aspirin, is suitably positioned to acetylate the Ser(530) hydroxyl group in the COX-2 primary binding site. The results of this study indicate that the SO(2)NHCOCH(3) pharmacophore present in N-acetyl-2-carboxybenzenesulfonamides is a suitable bioisostere for the acetoxy (OCOMe) group in aspirin.     

COX-1 and COX-2 contribute differentially to the LPS-induced release of PGE2 and TxA2 in liver macrophages

LPS induces an immediate release of thromboxane TxA2 and a delayed release of PGE2. Dexamethasone suppresses the LPS-induced release of TxA2 and PGE2. In the first 8 h after LPS addition, the specific COX-2 inhibitor SC236 inhibits the PGE2 and TxA2 release by about 80% and 20%, whereas the release of PGE2 and TxA2 between 8 and 24 h is inhibited by about 40% and 35%, respectively. Resident liver macrophages express substantial amounts of COX-1, TxAS, cPGES and mPGES-2, small amounts of COX-2 but almost no detectable amounts of mPGES-1. LPS induces an increase of COX-2 and mPGES-1, but does not change COX-1, cPGES, mPGES-2 and TxAS at protein level. Dexamethasone suppresses almost completely the LPS-induced effects on COX-2 and mPGES-1. It is concluded that (1) COX-1 and COX-2 are involved in the LPS-induced synthesis of TxA2 and PGE2; (2) TxA2 release is catalyzed at early time-points by the combined action of COX-1 and TxAs, whereas at later time points the newly expressed COX-2 couples to TxAS and contributes to the TxA2 release; (3) PGE2 release within the first 8 h is predominantly catalyzed by COX-2, whereas at later time-points COX-1 couples to the newly expressed mPGES-1 and contributes to the PGE2 release.     

Structure-based design of COX-2 selectivity into flurbiprofen

Comparative computer modeling of the X-ray crystal structures of cyclooxygenase isoforms COX-1 and COX-2 has led to the design of COX-2 selectivity into the nonselective inhibitor flurbiprofen. The COX-2 modeling was based on a postulated binding mode for flurbiprofen and took advantage of a small alcove in the COX-2 active site created by different positions of the Leu384 sidechain between COX-1 and COX-2. The design hypothesis was tested by synthesis and biological assay of a series of flurbiprofen analogs, culminating in the discovery of several inhibitors having up to 78-fold selectivity for COX-2 over COX-1.     

Ciglitazone mediates COX-2 dependent suppression of PGE2 in human non-small cell lung cancer cells

BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) over-expression and subsequent prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production are frequently associated with human non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are involved in tumor proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis. Here, we report that ciglitazone downregulates PGE2 in NSCLC cells. METHODS: PGE2 ELISA assay and COX-2 ELISA assay were performed for measuring PGE2 and COX-2, respectively, in NSCLC. The mRNA level of COX-2 was measured by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The transient transfection experiments were performed to measure COX-2 and peroxisome proliferator-response element (PPRE) promoter activity in NSCLC. Western blots were unitized to measure PGE synthase (PGES) and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) protein expression. RESULTS: COX-2 ELISA assays suggested that ciglitazone-dependent inhibition of PGE2 occurs through the suppression of COX-2. Ciglitazone treatment suppressed COX-2 mRNA expression and COX-2 promoter activity while upregulating PPRE promoter activity. Ciglitazone did not modify the expression of enzymes downstream of COX-2 including PGES and 15-PGDH. Utilization of a dominant-negative PPARgamma showed that the suppression of COX-2 and PGE2 by ciglitazone is mediated via non-PPAR pathways. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our findings suggest that ciglitazone is a negative modulator of COX-2/PGE2 in NSCLC.     

COX-2 与血液恶性疾病

环氧化酶(COX-2)是体内前列腺素(PG)合成过程中重要的限速酶,它在正常组织中表达甚少,但在肿瘤和炎性细胞中表达较多,近年来的研究表明COX-2的过表达与肿瘤的发生,发展有关,使COX-2成为肿瘤研究的新热点,但COX-2在实体肿瘤中的研究较多而与血液恶性疾病之间关系国内报道较少,现就COX-2的研究进展以及在血液恶性肿瘤中的作用做一综述。     

Glucosamine hydrochloride specifically inhibits COX-2 by preventing COX-2 N-glycosylation and by increasing COX-2 protein turnover in a proteasome-dependent manner

COX-2 and its products, including prostaglandin E(2), are involved in many inflammatory processes. Glucosamine (GS) is an amino monosaccharide and has been widely used for alternative regimen of (osteo) arthritis. However, the mechanism of action of GS on COX-2 expression remains unclear. Here we describe a new action mechanism of glucosamine hydrochloride (GS-HCl) to tackle endogenous and agonist-driven COX-2 at protein level. GS-HCl (but not GS sulfate, N-acetyl GS, or galactosamine HCl) resulted in a shift in the molecular mass of COX-2 from 72-74 to 66-70 kDa and concomitant inhibition of prostaglandin E(2) production in a concentration-dependent manner in interleukin (IL)-1beta-treated A549 human lung epithelial cells. Remarkably, GS-HCl-mediated decrease in COX-2 molecular mass was associated with inhibition of COX-2 N-glycosylation during translation, as assessed by the effect of tunicamycin, the protein N-glycosylation inhibitor, or of cycloheximide, the translation inhibitor, on COX-2 modification. Specifically, the effect of low concentration of GS-HCl (1 mM) or of tunicamycin (0.1 microg/ml) to produce the aglycosylated COX-2 was rescued by the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 but not by the lysosomal or caspase inhibitors. However, the proteasomal inhibitors did not show an effect at 5 mM GS-HCl, which produced the aglycosylated or completely deglycosylated form of COX-2. Notably, GS-HCl (5 mM) also facilitated degradation of the higher molecular species of COX-2 in IL-1beta-treated A549 cells that was retarded by MG132. GS-HCl (5 mM) was also able to decrease the molecular mass of endogenous and IL-1beta- or tumor necrosis factor-alpha-driven COX-2 in different human cell lines, including Hep2 (bronchial) and H292 (laryngeal). However, GS-HCl did not affect COX-1 protein expression. These results demonstrate for the first time that GS-HCl inhibits COX-2 activity by preventing COX-2 co-translational N-glycosylation and by facilitating COX-2 protein turnover during translation in a proteasome-dependent manner.     

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of linear 1-(4-, 3- or 2-methylsulfonylphenyl)-2-phenylacetylenes: a novel class of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

A group of regioisomeric 1-(methylsulfonylphenyl)-2-phenylacetylenes possessing a COX-2 SO(2)Me pharmacophore at the para-, meta- or ortho-position of the C-1 phenyl ring, in conjunction with a C-2 phenyl or substituted-phenyl ring substituent (3-F, 3-OMe, 3-OH, 3-OAc, 4-Me), were designed for evaluation as selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. These target linear 1,2-diarylacetylenes were synthesized via a palladium-catalyzed Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction followed by oxidation of the respective 1-(methylthiophenyl)-2-phenylacetylene intermediate. In vitro COX-1/COX-2 isozyme inhibition structure-activity studies identified 1-(3-methylsulfonylphenyl)-2-(4-methylphenyl)acetylene (12d) as a potent COX-2 inhibitor (IC(50) = 0.32 microM) with a high COX-2 selectivity index (SI > 320) comparable to the reference compound rofecoxib (COX-2 IC(50) = 0.50 microM; COX-2 SI > 200). A molecular modeling study where (12d) was docked in the binding site of COX-2 showed that the MeSO(2) COX-2 pharmacophore was positioned in the vicinity of the secondary COX-2 binding site near Val(523). The 1-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)-2-(3-acetoxyphenyl)acetylene (11f, COX-1 IC(50) = 1.00 microM; COX-2 IC(50) = 0.06 microM; COX-2 SI = 16.7) and 1-(3-methylsulfonylphenyl)-2-(3-acetoxyphenyl)acetylene (12f, COX-1 IC(50) = 6.5 microM; COX-2 IC(50) = 0.05 microM; COX-2 SI = 130) regioisomers exhibited comparable COX-2 inhibition, and moderately lower selective COX-2 selectivity, relative to the reference drug celecoxib (COX-1 IC(50) = 33.1 microM; COX-2 IC(50) = 0.07 microM; COX-2 SI = 472). The most potent anti-inflammatory agent 1-(3-methylsulfonylphenyl)-2-(4-methylphenyl)acetylene (12d) exhibited moderate oral anti-inflammatory activity (ED(50)= 129 mg/kg) at 3 h postdrug administration relative to the reference drug celecoxib (ED(50) = 10.8 mg/kg) in a carrageenan-induced rat paw edema assay. The structure-activity data acquired indicate that the acetylene moiety constitutes a suitable scaffold (template) to design novel acyclic 1,2-diarylacetylenes with selective COX-2, or dual COX-1/COX-2, inhibitory activities.     

Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in gastric mucosal defense.

Two isoenzymes of cyclooxygenase (COX), the key enzyme in prostaglandin (PG) biosynthesis, COX-1 and COX-2, have been identified. COX-1 was proposed to regulate physiological functions, COX-2 to mediate pathophysiological reactions such as inflammation. In particular, it was suggested that maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity relies exclusively on COX-1. Recently, it was shown that a selective COX-1 inhibitor does not damage the mucosa in the healthy rat stomach, although mucosal prostaglandin formation is near-maximally suppressed. However, concurrent treatment with a COX-1 and a COX-2 inhibitor induces severe gastric damage. This indicates that in normal mucosa both COX-1 and COX-2 have to be inhibited to evoke ulcerogenic effects. In the acid-challenged rat stomach inhibition of COX-1 alone is associated with dose-dependent injury which is aggravated by additional inhibition of COX-2 activity or prevention of acid-induced up-regulation of COX-2 expression by dexamethasone. After acid exposure, COX-2 inhibitors cause substantial gastric injury when nitric oxide formation is suppressed or afferent nerves are defunctionalized. Ischemia-reperfusion of the gastric artery increases levels of COX-2 but not COX-1 mRNA. COX-2 inhibitors or dexamethasone aggravate ischemia-reperfusion-induced mucosal damage up to 4-fold, an effect abolished by concurrent administration of 16,16-dimethyl-PGE2. Furthermore, the protective effects elicited by a mild irritant or intragastric peptone perfusion are antagonized by COX-2 inhibitors. Finally, COX-2 expression is increased in experimental ulcers. COX-2 inhibitors delay the healing of chronic gastric ulcers in experimental animals and decrease epithelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis and maturation of the granulation tissue to the same extent as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These observations indicate that, in contrast to the initial concept, COX-2 plays an important role in gastric mucosal defense.     

Cyclooxygenase-2 in cancer: A review

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is frequently expressed in many types of cancers exerting a pleiotropic and multifaceted role in genesis or promotion of carcinogenesis and cancer cell resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. COX-2 is released by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), macrophage type 2 (M2) cells, and cancer cells to the tumor microenvironment (TME). COX-2 induces cancer stem cell (CSC)-like activity, and promotes apoptotic resistance, proliferation, angiogenesis, inflammation, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells. COX-2 mediated hypoxia within the TME along with its positive interactions with YAP1 and antiapoptotic mediators are all in favor of cancer cell resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. COX-2 exerts most of the functions through its metabolite prostaglandin E2. In some and limited situations, COX-2 may act as an antitumor enzyme. Multiple signals are contributed to the functions of COX-2 on cancer cells or its regulation. Members of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and nuclear factor-κβ are main upstream modulators for COX-2 in cancer cells. COX-2 also has interactions with a number of hormones within the body. Inhibition of COX-2 provides a high possibility to exert therapeutic outcomes in cancer. Administration of COX-2 inhibitors in a preoperative setting could reduce the risk of metastasis in cancer patients. COX-2 inhibition also sensitizes cancer cells to treatments like radio- and chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic agents adversely induce COX-2 activity. Therefore, choosing an appropriate chemotherapy drugs along with adjustment of the type and does for COX-2 inhibitors based on the type of cancer would be an effective adjuvant strategy for targeting cancer.     

Inhibitory mode of 2-acetoxyphenyl alkyl sulfides against COX-1 and COX-2: QSAR analyses

Selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors is an important strategy in design of potent anti-inflammatory compounds with significantly reduced side effects. Therefore, QSAR studies of 2-acetoxyphenyl alkyl sulfides were performed using Bioloom, CAChe 6.1, and Dragon 3.0 for the COX-2 and COX-1 inhibition. The analyses have produced good predictive and statistically significant QSAR models. These studies suggest that lipophilicity affects both COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition in different manner and indicator variables like presence of aromatic ring and triple bond play an important role in COX-2 selectivity. Branching in the molecule, higher path length 6 rich in polarizability, and lesser number of carbonyl groups would be favorable for COX-2 inhibition. Fourth highest eigenvalue of burden matrix corresponding to atomic mass would be favorable for COX-2 inhibition and sixth lowest eigenvalue of burden matrix corresponding to Sanderson electronegativities is conducive for COX-1 inhibition. Lower path length 3 rich in atomic mass and lesser degree of unsaturation in the molecule would be favorable for COX-1 inhibition.