Order of the Proteasomal ATPases and Eukaryotic Proteasome Assembly

The 26S proteasome is responsible for a large fraction of the regulated protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. The enzyme complex is composed of a 20S proteolytic core particle (CP) capped on one or both ends with a 19S regulatory particle (RP). The RP recognizes and unfolds substrates and translocates them into the CP. The RP can be further divided into lid and base subcomplexes. The base contains a ring of six AAA+ ATPases (Rpts) that directly abuts the CP and is responsible for unfolding substrates and driving them into the CP for proteolysis. Although 120 arrangements of the six different ATPases within the ring are possible in principle, they array themselves in one specific order. The high sequence and structural similarity between the Rpt subunits presents special challenges for their ordered association and incorporation into the assembling proteasome. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of proteasomal RP base biogenesis, with emphasis on potential specificity determinants in ring arrangement, and the implications of the ATPase ring arrangement for proteasome assembly.     

The Archaeal Proteasome Is Regulated by a Network of AAA ATPases

The proteasome is the central machinery for targeted protein degradation in archaea, Actinobacteria, and eukaryotes. In its basic form, it consists of a regulatory ATPase complex and a proteolytic core particle. The interaction between the two is governed by an HbYX motif (where Hb is a hydrophobic residue, Y is tyrosine, and X is any amino acid) at the C terminus of the ATPase subunits, which stimulates gate opening of the proteasomal α-subunits. In archaea, the proteasome-interacting motif is not only found in canonical proteasome-activating nucleotidases of the PAN/ARC/Rpt group, which are absent in major archaeal lineages, but also in proteins of the CDC48/p97/VAT and AMA groups, suggesting a regulatory network of proteasomal ATPases. Indeed, Thermoplasma acidophilum, which lacks PAN, encodes one CDC48 protein that interacts with the 20S proteasome and activates the degradation of model substrates. In contrast, Methanosarcina mazei contains seven AAA proteins, five of which, both PAN proteins, two out of three CDC48 proteins, and the AMA protein, function as proteasomal gatekeepers. The prevalent presence of multiple, distinct proteasomal ATPases in archaea thus results in a network of regulatory ATPases that may widen the substrate spectrum of proteasomal protein degradation.     

Quaternary structure of the ATPase complex of human 26S proteasomes determined by chemical cross-linking

The 26S proteasome is the major protease responsible for nonlysosomal protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. The enzyme is composed of two subparticles: the 20S proteasome, and a 19S regulatory particle (PA700) which binds to the ends of the 20S proteasome cylinder and accounts for ATP dependence and substrate specificity. Among the approximately 18 subunits of PA700 regulator, six are ATPases. The ATPases presumably recognize, unfold, and translocate substrates into the interior of the 26S proteasome. It is generally believed that the ATPases form a hexameric ring. By means of chemical cross-linking, immunoprecipitation, and blotting, we have determined that the ATPases are organized in the order S6-S6'-S10b-S8-S4-S7. Additionally, we found cross-links between the ATPase S10b and the 20S proteasome subunit alpha6. Together with the previously known interaction between S8 and alpha1 and between S4 and alpha7, these data establish the relative orientations of ATPases with respect to the 20S proteasome.     

Evolution of proton pumping ATPases: Rooting the tree of life

Proton pumping ATPases are found in all groups of present day organisms. The F-ATPases of eubacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts also function as ATP synthases, i.e., they catalyze the final step that transforms the energy available from reduction/oxidation reactions (e.g., in photosynthesis) into ATP, the usual energy currency of modern cells. The primary structure of these ATPases/ATP synthases was found to be much more conserved between different groups of bacteria than other parts of the photosynthetic machinery, e.g., reaction center proteins and redox carrier complexes.These F-ATPases and the vacuolar type ATPase, which is found on many of the endomembranes of eukaryotic cells, were shown to be homologous to each other; i.e., these two groups of ATPases evolved from the same enzyme present in the common ancestor. (The term eubacteria is used here to denote the phylogenetic group containing all bacteria except the archaebacteria.) Sequences obtained for the plasmamembrane ATPase of various archaebacteria revealed that this ATPase is much more similar to the eukaryotic than to the eubacterial counterpart. The eukaryotic cell of higher organisms evolved from a symbiosis between eubacteria (that evolved into mitochondria and chloroplasts) and a host organism. Using the vacuolar type ATPase as a molecular marker for the cytoplasmic component of the eukaryotic cell reveals that this host organism was a close relative of the archaebacteria.A unique feature of the evolution of the ATPases is the presence of a non-catalytic subunit that is paralogous to the catalytic subunit, i.e., the two types of subunits evolved from a common ancestral gene. Since the gene duplication that gave rise to these two types of subunits had already occurred in the last common ancestor of all living organisms, this non-catalytic subunit can be used to root the tree of life by means of an outgroup; that is, the location of the last common ancestor of the major domains of living organisms (archaebacteria, eubacteria and eukaryotes) can be located in the tree of life without assuming constant or equal rates of change in the different branches.A correlation between structure and function of ATPases has been established for present day organisms. Implications resulting from this correlation for biochemical pathways, especially photosynthesis, that were operative in the last common ancestor and preceding life forms are discussed.     

Inactivation of the 20S proteasome in Mycobacterium smegmatis

The 20S proteasome is an essential component of the cytosolic protein turnover apparatus of eukaryotic cells. In higher eukaryotes, the 20S proteasome is responsible for most cytosolic protein turnover and also generates peptides for subsequent presentation by the MHC class I pathway. Structurally, the eukaryotic 20S proteasome is extremely complex, being composed of 14 different subunits. Proteasomes with simplified subunit composition have been identified in certain eubacteria and archaebacteria but, in each case, the proteasome-containing organism is recalcitrant to further molecular genetic analyses. As a result, no in vivo characterization of a simplified eubacterial or archaebacterial proteasome has been reported. We have shown that the genetically tractable eubacterium Mycobacterium smegmatis contains a 20S proteasome, allowing the first in vivo characterization of a simplified 20S proteasome. We use a positive/negative selection scheme to inactivate the genes encoding 20S proteasome subunits and demonstrate that, in contrast to eukaryotic cells, M. smegmatis cells lacking intact proteasome genes are viable and phenotypically indistinguishable from congenic strains containing proteasomes. Implications for the evolution of the protein turnover apparatus are discussed.     

Archaebacterial ATPases: relationship to other ion-translocating ATPase families examined in terms of immunological cross-reactivity

Immunological cross-reactivity among three types of H(+)-ATPases, that is, three archaebacterial ATPases, the F1-ATPase from thermophilic bacterium PS3 (TF1) and the vacuolar membrane ATPase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, was examined by means of immunoblot analyses. The three archaebacterial ATPases were very similar in immunological cross-reactivity, suggesting that they belong to the same family of ATPases. Cross-reaction was also observed between the ATPase from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, one of the three archaebacteria, and TF1. S. cerevisiae vacuolar ATPase reacted with the antibodies prepared against each of the three archaebacterial ATPases, but did not react with the antibody against TF1. Electron microscopic examination revealed that the oligomeric structure of Sulfolobus ATPase was very similar to that of F1-ATPase. These results, taken together, suggest that the archaebacterial ATPases share close structural similarities with the vacuolar ATPases, and, to a lesser degree, with the F0F1-ATPases.     

Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry

The 20S proteasome functions in protein degradation in eukaryotes together with the 19S ATPases or in archaea with the homologous PAN ATPase complex. These ATPases contain a conserved C-terminal hydrophobic-tyrosine-X motif (HbYX). We show that these residues are essential for PAN to associate with the 20S and open its gated channel for substrate entry. Upon ATP binding, these C-terminal residues bind to pockets between the 20S's alpha subunits. Seven-residue or longer peptides from PAN's C terminus containing the HbYX motif also bind to these sites and induce gate opening in the 20S. Gate opening could be induced by C-terminal peptides from the 19S ATPase subunits, Rpt2, and Rpt5, but not by ones from PA28/26, which lack the HbYX motif and cause gate opening by distinct mechanisms. C-terminal residues in the 19S ATPases were also shown to be critical for gating and stability of 26S proteasomes. Thus, the C termini of the proteasomal ATPases function like a "key in a lock" to induce gate opening and allow substrate entry.     

The Proteasome-associated Protein Ecm29 Inhibits Proteasomal ATPase Activity and in Vivo Protein Degradation by the Proteasome

Several proteasome-associated proteins regulate degradation by the 26 S proteasome using the ubiquitin chains that mark most substrates for degradation. The proteasome-associated protein Ecm29, however, has no ubiquitin-binding or modifying activity, and its direct effect on substrate degradation is unclear. Here, we show that Ecm29 acts as a proteasome inhibitor. Besides inhibiting the proteolytic cleavage of peptide substrates in vitro, it inhibits the degradation of ubiquitin-dependent and -independent substrates in vivo. Binding of Ecm29 to the proteasome induces a closed conformation of the substrate entry channel of the core particle. Furthermore, Ecm29 inhibits proteasomal ATPase activity, suggesting that the mechanism of inhibition and gate regulation by Ecm29 is through regulation of the proteasomal ATPases. Consistent with this, we identified through chemical cross-linking that Ecm29 binds to, or in close proximity to, the proteasomal ATPase subunit Rpt5. Additionally, we show that Ecm29 preferentially associates with both mutant and nucleotide depleted proteasomes. We propose that the inhibitory ability of Ecm29 is important for its function as a proteasome quality control factor by ensuring that aberrant proteasomes recognized by Ecm29 are inactive.     

Evolution and a revised nomenclature of P4 ATPases,a eukaryotic family of lipid flippases

In all eukaryotic cells, P4 ATPases, also named phospholipid flippases, generate phospholipid asymmetry across biological membranes. This process is essential for cell survival, as it is required for vesicle budding and fusion in the secretory pathway. Several P4 ATPase isoforms can be identified in all sequenced eukaryotic genomes, but their evolution and interrelationships are poorly described. In this study, we conducted a thorough phylogenetic analysis of P4 ATPases in all major eukaryotic super-groups and found that they can be divided into three distinct families, P4A, P4B and P4C ATPases, all of which have an ancient origin. While P4B ATPases have been lost in plants, P4A ATPases are present in all eukaryotic super-groups. P4C ATPases form an intermediate group between the other two but appear to share a common origin with P4A ATPases. Sequence motifs unique to P4 ATPases are situated in the basal ATP hydrolyzing machinery. In addition, no clear signature motifs within P4 ATPase subgroups were found that could be related to lipid specificity, likely pointing to an elaborate transport mechanism in which different amino acid residue combinations in these pumps can result in recognition of the same substrate.     

ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins

The archaeal ATPase complex PAN, the homolog of the eukaryotic 26S proteasome-regulatory ATPases, was shown to associate transiently with the 20S proteasome upon binding of ATP or ATPgammaS, but not ADP. By electron microscopy (EM), PAN appears as a two-ring structure, capping the 20S, and resembles two densities in the 19S complex. The N termini of the archaeal 20S alpha subunits were found to function as a gate that prevents entry of seven-residue peptides but allows entry of tetrapeptides. Upon association with the 20S particle, PAN stimulates gate opening. Although degradation of globular proteins requires ATP hydrolysis, the PAN-20S complex with ATPgammaS translocates and degrades unfolded and denatured proteins. Rabbit 26S proteasomes also degrade these unfolded proteins upon ATP binding, without hydrolysis. Thus, although unfolding requires energy from ATP hydrolysis, ATP binding alone supports ATPase-20S association, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded substrates into the proteasome, which can occur by facilitated diffusion through the ATPase.     

Molecular cloning of genes encoding major two subunits of a eubacterial V-type ATPase from Thermus thermophilus.

The atpAB genes which encode the alpha and beta subunits of membrane ATPase from a thermophilic eubacterium, Thermus thermophilus HB8, were cloned. The deduced amino-acid sequences of the alpha subunit (583 amino acids) and the beta subunit (478 amino acids) are only moderately similar to the alpha beta subunits of the F0F1-ATPases, while they are highly similar to the major two subunits of the V-type ATPases, a family of ATPases which have been so far found in eukaryotic endomembrane vacuolar vesicles and archaebacterial plasma membranes. Thus, T. thermophilus ATPase belongs to the V-type ATPase family, even though this bacterium is a eubacterium. The hypothesis that the differentiation of an ancestral ATPase into V-type and F0F1-ATPase occurred after the evolution of a primordial cell into archaebacteria and eubacteria should be modified accordingly.     

Molecular phylogenies based on ribosomal protein L11, L1, L10, and L12 sequences

Summary Available sequences that correspond to the E. coli ribosomal proteins L11, L1, L10, and L12 from eubacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes have been aligned. The alignments were analyzed qualitatively for shared structural features and for conservation of deletions or insertions. The alignments were further subjected to quantitative phylogenetic analysis, and the amino acid identity between selected pairs of sequences was calculated. In general, eubacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes each form coherent and well-resolved nonoverlapping phylogenetic domains. The degree of diversity of the four proteins between the three groups is not uniform. For L11, the eubacterial and archaebacterial proteins are very similar whereas the eukaryotic L11 is clearly less similar. In contrast, in the case of the L12 proteins and to a lesser extent the L10 proteins, the archaebacterial and eukaryotic proteins are similar whereas the eubacterial proteins are different. The eukaryotic L1 equivalent protein has yet to be identified. If the root of the universal tree is near or within the eubacterial domain, our ribosomal protein-based phylogenies indicate that archaebacteria are monophyletic. The eukaryotic lineage appears to originate either near or within the archaebacterial domain. Correspondence to: P. Dennis     

The Evolution of the Conserved ATPase Domain (CAD): Reconstructing the History of an Ancient Protein Module

The AAA proteins (ATPases Associated with a variety of cellular Activities) are found in eubacterial, archaebacterial, and eukaryotic species and participate in a large number of cellular processes, including protein degradation, vesicle fusion, cell cycle control, and cellular secretory processes. The AAA proteins are characterized by the presence of a 230 to 250-amino acid ATPase domain referred to as the Conserved ATPase Domain or CAD. Phylogenetic analysis of 133 CAD sequences from 38 species reveal that AAA CADs are organized into discrete groups that are related not only in structure but in cellular function. Evolutionary analyses also indicate that the CAD was present in the last common ancestor of eubacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes. The eubacterial CADs are found in metalloproteases, while CAD-containing proteins in the archaebacterial and eukaryotic lineages appear to have diversified by a series of gene duplication events that lead to the establishment of different functional AAA proteins, including proteasomal regulatory, NSF/Sec, and Pas proteins. The phylogeny of the CADs provides the basis for establishing the patterns of evolutionary change that characterize the AAA proteins. Received: 28 January 1997 / Accepted: 8 May 1997     

The membrane-associated ATPase from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius is distantly related to F1-ATPase as assessed from the primary structure of its alpha-subunit

Isolation of novel membrane-associated ATPases, presumably soluble parts of the H+-ATPases, from archaebacteria has been recently reported, and their properties were found to be significantly different from the usual F1-ATPase. In order to assess the relationship of the archaebacterial ATPases to the F1-ATPases and other known ATPases, the amino acid sequence of the alpha subunit of the ATPase from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, an acidothermophilic archaebacterium, was compared with the sequences of other ATPases. The gene encoding its alpha subunit was cloned from the genomic library of S. acidocaldarius, and the nucleotide sequence was determined. The 591-amino acid sequence deduced from the nucleotide sequence contains a small number of short stretches that shows sequence similarity to the alpha and beta subunits of F1-ATPase. However, the overall similarity is too weak to consider it to be a typical member of the F1-ATPase family when the highly conserved sequences of the F1-ATPase subunits among various organisms are taken into account. Moreover, most of these stretches overlap the consensus sequences that are commonly found in some nucleotide-binding proteins. There is no significant sequence similarity to the ion-translocating ATPases, which form phosphorylated intermediates, such as animal Na+,K+-ATPases. Thus, the S. acidocaldarius ATPase and probably other archaebacterial ATPases also appear to belong to a new group of ion-translocating ATPases that has only a distant relationship to F1-ATPase.     

Proteasomes of the yeastS. cerevisiae: genes,structure and functions

Proteasomes are large multicatalytic protease complexes which fulfil central functions in major intracellular proteolytic pathways of the eukaryotic cell. 20S proteasomes are 700 kDa cylindrically shaped particles, found in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of all eukaryotes. They are composed of a pool of 14 different subunits (MW 22–25 kDa) arranged in a stack of 4 rings with 7-fold symmetry. In the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae a complete set of 14 genes coding for 20S proteasome subunits have been cloned and sequenced. 26S proteasomes are even larger proteinase complexes (about 1700 kDa) which degrade ubiquitinylated proteins in an ATP-dependent fashionin vitro. The 26S proteasome is build up from the 20S proteasome as core particle and two additional 19S complexes at both ends of the 20S cylinder. Recently existence of a 26S proteasome in yeast has been demonstrated. Several 26S proteasome specific genes have been cloned and sequenced. They share similarity with a novel defined family of ATPases. 20S and 26S proteasomes are essential for functioning of the eukaryotic cell. Chromosomal deletion of 20S and 26S proteasomal genes in the yeastS. cerevisiae caused lethality of the cell. Thein vivo functions of proteasomes in major proteolytic pathways have been demonstrated by the use of 20S and 26S proteasomal mutants. Proteasomes are needed for stress dependent and ubiquitin mediated proteolysis. They are involved in the degradation of short-lived and regulatory proteins. Proteasomes are important for cell differentiation and adaptation to environmental changes. Proteasomes have also been shown to function in the control of the cell cycle.     

The 19S regulatory complex of the proteasome functions independently of proteolysis in nucleotide excision repair.

The 26S proteasome degrades proteins targeted by the ubiquitin pathway, a function thought to explain its role in cellular processes. The proteasome interacts with the ubiquitin-like N terminus of Rad23, a nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Deletion of the ubiquitin-like domain causes UV radiation sensitivity. Here, we show that the ubiquitin-like domain of Rad23 is required for optimal activity of an in vitro NER system. Inhibition of proteasomal ATPases diminishes NER activity in vitro and increases UV sensitivity in vivo. Surprisingly, blockage of protein degradation by the proteasome has no effect on the efficiency of NER. This establishes that the regulatory complex of the proteasome has a function independent of protein degradation.     

Cdc48 (p97): a ‘molecular gearbox’ in the ubiquitin pathway?

Cdc48 (p97), a conserved chaperone-like ATPase of eukaryotic cells, has attracted attention recently because of its wide range of cellular functions. Cdc48 is intimately linked to the ubiquitin pathway because its primary action is to segregate ubiquitinated substrates from unmodified partners. This 'segregase' activity is crucial for certain proteasomal degradation pathways and for some nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin. Cdc48 associates not only with different 'substrate-recruiting cofactors' but also with distinct 'substrate-processing cofactors'. The latter proteins control the degree of ubiquitination of bound substrates by shifting the polyubiquitination reaction into 'forward', 'neutral' or 'reverse'. We discuss how Cdc48 might use this 'gearbox activity' to control protein fate and propose a similar mode of action for the 19S cap of the proteasome.