Sequential adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: rationale and clinical results

For the past 15 years tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant hormone therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, irrespective of nodal status and other clinicopathological parameters. Recent studies provided evidence that the optimal duration of tamoxifen treatment is 5 years. Based on the positive clinical results obtained with the administration of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the metastatic setting, several controlled clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and side effects of AIs versus standard tamoxifen also as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The results of the above studies, suggest a therapeutic advantage of AIs over tamoxifen with regard to relapse-free survival and the risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer. We review the rationale and the available clinical data on initial or sequential hormone treatment with AIs and we propose a novel scenario for possible therapeutic strategies based on the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and on the biology of each single tumor.     

Vascular effects of aromatase inhibitors: data from clinical trials

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are becoming the endocrine treatment of first choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and are under investigation for use in breast cancer prevention. AIs reduce circulating estrogen to barely detectable concentrations. It is possible that such a low concentration will be deleterious to the vascular system since estrogen receptors are known to be in the cell walls of blood vessels and estrogen is thought to be important in maintaining blood vessel integrity. Because most women who present with primary breast cancer are cured by surgery and systemic therapy and the major cause of female death is vascular disease, it is particularly important to investigate the vascular side effects of AIs in current breast cancer adjuvant and prevention trials. In order to set the vascular toxicities of AIs reported in the current adjuvant trials into context, here we compare them with the toxicities seen during treatment with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Clinical trial evidence indicates that HRT increases risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) whereas SERMs and AIs (to date) appear to be neutral. Cerebrovascular disease and venous thromboembotic events are increased by HRT and SERMs but appear to be unaffected by treatment with AIs. Cognitive function is also considered here since it may also have a vascular component and is potentially a serious potential side effect/benefit of AIs. Recent studies indicate that HRT has a small detrimental effect on cognitive function and is associated with a doubling of the incidence of dementia. A comprehensive study of the SERM, raloxifene, on cognitive function showed no significant effect. There are no definitive reported studies investigating tamoxifen and none for AIs on cognitive function, although there is one in progress in the context of the IBIS II prevention trial which compares anastrozole to placebo in women at high risk. At present concerns about deleterious vascular side effects are confined to HRT and SERMs. However, we have few long-term data using AIs for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.     

Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer

Estrogens are known to be important in the growth of breast cancers in both pre and postmenopausal women. As the number of breast cancer patients increases with age, the majority of breast cancer patients are postmenopausal women. Although estrogens are no longer made in the ovaries after menopause, peripheral tissues produce sufficient concentrations to stimulate tumor growth. As aromatase catalyzes the final and rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of estrogen, inhibitors of this enzyme are effective targeted therapy for breast cancer. Three aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now FDA approved and have been shown to be more effective than the antiestrogen tamoxifen and are well tolerated. AIs are now a standard treatment for postmenopausal patients. AIs are effective in adjuvant and first-line metastatic setting. This review describes the development of AIs and their current use in breast cancer. Recent research focuses on elucidating mechanisms of acquired resistance that may develop in some patients with long term AI treatment and also in innate resistance. Preclinical data in resistance models demonstrated that the crosstalk between ER and other signaling pathways particularly MAPK and PI3K/Akt is an important resistant mechanism. Blockade of these other signaling pathways is an attractive strategy to circumvent the resistance to AI therapy in breast cancer. Several clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of these novel targeted therapies to reverse resistance to AIs. Article from the special issue on 'Targeted Inhibitors'.     

Adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors: determining the future landscape of adjuvant endocrine therapy

This review will discuss the role of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant setting, and will summarize major strategies behind individual adjuvant trials using aromatase inhibitors. Studies with the third generation AIs including anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, have shown better outcome and improved therapeutic ratio over second line hormonal approaches (i.e. progestins or aminoglutethimide) and, more recently, over tamoxifen also. These promising results have led recently to testing of AIs in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal patients. Most trials now in progress are evaluating the role of new AIs versus tamoxifen (T) given×5 years, which in most institutions is currently the standard hormonal adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Three adjuvant approaches are being tested. First is the use of AI+T×5 years in combination versus each agent alone, as reflected in the recently completed ATAC trial. Second is a sequential approach T first×2–3 years followed by AIs×2–3 years, or the other way round; and third, T×5 years followed by AIs for additional 5 years (i.e. total duration of adjuvant hormones of 10 years). Many patients in the above trials will survive their first cancer. Hence, the non-oncological outcomes known to be affected by hormones are of rising importance. Therefore, the assessment of lipids as surrogates for cardiovascular morbidity, and of bone mineral status, as a marker for osteoporosis/bone fractures, is an important component of these trials. Also discussed in this review are proposals for future studies of AIs with focus on hormone resistance, such as early alteration of multiple hormonal agents or their intermittent use, the impact of the new generation of SERMs or ‘pure’ antiestrogens on activity of AIs, and the rising importance of AIs interacting with biologicals, cytokines or hormone modulators.     

Summary of aromatase inhibitor trials: the past and future

Antagonizing estrogen by inhibition of aromatase has become a mainstay of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Recent trials have shown an incremental gain for the AIs over tamoxifen when given as an up-front alternative to tamoxifen, but additionally added benefit is achieved by giving them in sequence with tamoxifen after either an early switch (2–3 years) or as a late switch (5 years). The true clinical implications of accelerated bone resorption from AIs is becoming better understood and its management defined. AI minimally effect quality of life. The chronic relapsing nature of ER+ breast cancer implies long term therapy will be of benefit in selected patients. Outstanding issues under investigation include optimal duration of endocrine therapy, optimal sequence, optimal agents and whether combining anti-estrogens will yield advantage. The role of AIs is also under investigation in premenopausal women in combination with ovarian function suppression. Identifying prognostic and predictive factors of endocrine therapy is important as is the identification and overcoming of resistance mechanisms. Both tumor and host signatures are being pursued to this end. Optimizing, expanding and extending endocrine therapy is likely to add further to patient outcome.     

Are aromatase inhibitors superior to antiestrogens?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been in use to treat metastatic breast cancer for over 25 years. Recently potent and specific AIs have been introduced, which, because of their low toxicity profile, are being used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant situation and also for the prevention of breast cancer. The two non-steroidal AIs, anastrozole and letrozole, and the steroidal AI, exemestane, have all shown superiority to tamoxifen as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Interestingly, the oestrogen receptor downregulator, fulvestrant, was shown to be equivalent to anastrozole when compared as second-line therapy after the failure of tamoxifen. The first adjuvant AI trial began in 1996 and recruited over 9000 patients (ATAC trial). Anastrozole was compared with tamoxifen and a combination of the two drugs. There were no significant differences between tamoxifen and the combination. However, anastrozole showed about a 20% improvement in disease-free survival in ER+ disease compared with the other treatments. An overall survival analysis will be reported later this year. Two trials have compared 5 years of tamoxifen with 2–3 years of tamoxifen, followed by 2–3 years of AI (one trial (ITA) used anastrozole and another (intergroup) exemestane). Both trials show a disease-free advantage for the switch to AI. In another study (MA17) 5 years of tamoxifen was followed by a randomisation to letrozole or placebo and showed a significant disease-free advantage to the AI. Both letrozole and anastrozole show superiority to tamoxifen when used as a neoadjuvant therapy. Anastrozole significantly reduced contralateral breast cancer compared with tamoxifen, and this has led to two prevention trials: one in women at risk comparing anastrozole with placebo and the other after excision of DCIS comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen (IBIS II). The NCI Canada has also just initiated a trial of exemestane for prevention. Nearly all data available indicate that AIs are superior to tamoxifen. The important question is whether survival is improved when they are used as adjuvant therapy?     

Overview of adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors are an important class of drugs for use in adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with resected estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Multiple large prospective randomized trials have established their value in this setting and provided guidance for their use in clinical management. This review will outline the trials that have provided evidence on the value of the aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting as well as the ongoing trials that will expand our knowledge of how to use them most effectively.     

Clinical use of aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal women

Aromatase inhibitors (AI) block the last enzymatic step of estrogen production, the aromatization of the A-cycle of aromatizable androgens and particularly, androstenedione (Δ4) and testosterone (T). Molecules designed for interfering with aromatase activity have existed for many years. Yet the activity of products of the aminogluthetimide era was unspecific and these substances carried too many side effects for being used clinically. Newer third generation AIs, however, are highly specific and essentially devoid of side effects. These molecules have recently been approved for treating breast cancer in postmenopausal women either, in advanced forms or, as part of adjuvant therapy.

In women whose ovaries are active, a temporary inhibition of E2 production will raise gonadotropins and in turn, stimulate follicular growth. In cancer patients, this property precludes the use of AIs in women whose ovaries are still active, unless gonadotropins are blocked. But in infertility patients, this property of AIs has been put to play for inducing ovulation. AIs have been used both in women who do not ovulate but whose hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis is active (oligo-anovulators of PCOD type) and those who ovulate regularly but in whom multiple ovulation is sought for treating unexplained infertility or as part of IVF. Like clomiphene citrate (CC), AIs are not usable in women whose gonadotropins are suppressed, as in the case of hypothalamic amenorrhea.

The sum of data available on the use of AI for inducing ovulation remains however meager to this date and is mainly constituted of pilot and non-randomized trials. Yet mounting evidence tends to support AIs’ advantages over CC for induction of ovulation. Hence, we think that the likelihood that these drugs will play a key role in induction of ovulation in the future is high. AIs appear particularly interesting for treating unexplained infertility because AI-FSH/hMG regimens are lighter than FSH-only regimens while retaining the high pregnancy rates of these latter treatments.     

Antiestrogen use in breast cancer patients reduces the risk of subsequent lung cancer: A population-based study

BackgroundThere is accumulating epidemiological and preclinical evidence that estrogen might be a driver of lung cancer. Breast cancer survivors can offer a unique patient cohort to examine the effect of antiestrogen therapy on lung cancer carcinogenesis because many of these women would have received long-term selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and/or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as adjuvant treatment. Our hypothesis is that estrogens play a role in lung cancer development, and that antiestrogen therapy would affect the incidence of subsequent lung cancer among breast cancer survivors.MethodsUsing the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) database, the study included 40,900 survivors of non-metastatic breast cancer after primary surgery, and most antiestrogen users complied well with the medication regimen. We evaluate the effect of antiestrogen therapy on the incidence of subsequent lung cancers.ResultsThis population-based study revealed that antiestrogen use in breast cancer patients was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent lung cancer in older patients (≥50 years) (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.54–0.99) when compared with breast cancer survivors who did not use antiestrogens.ConclusionThe study supports the hypothesis that antiestrogen therapy modifies lung cancer carcinogenesis in older women. Further well-designed clinical trials to explore the potential of antiestrogens in lung cancer prevention and treatment would be worthwhile.     

Aromatase inhibitors for therapy of advanced breast cancer

In postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, numerous phase III trials have been performed comparing the third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NS-AIs) anastrozole and letrozole and the steroidal AI (S-AI) exemestane in the “first-line” setting against tamoxifen and in the “second-line” setting against megestrol acetate. In both settings, the AIs were at least as efficacious or superior in some endpoints with a preferable toxicity profile including a lower incidence of thrombotic events. Relatively small differences in potency between the three AIs have been identified and it has not been demonstrated that these differences have clinical implications. The recent establishment of the value of AIs in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women will impact on their utilization in advanced disease. In premenopausal women the third-generation AIs have not been studied as monotherapy and there is a paucity of data in combination with ovarian function suppression in the advanced disease setting. The main area of future investigations for the AIs in premenopausal women will be in the adjuvant therapy setting in combination with suppression of ovarian function.     

The citrus flavonone hesperetin prevents letrozole-induced bone loss in a mouse model of breast cancer

Aromatase is a key enzyme in estrogen synthesis, and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been developed for treating estrogen-responsive breast cancer. Because of its nondiscriminatory inhibition of estrogen synthesis, patients treated with AIs also contract diseases typically associated with estrogen deficiency, such as bone deterioration. Our laboratory found that the citrus flavonone hesperetin could inhibit aromatase, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator nature of flavonoid might counteract the undesirable effect of AIs. In the present study, we employed an established postmenopausal model for breast carcinogenesis to examine the drug interaction between hesperetin and letrozole, one of the AIs. Athymic mice were ovariectomized and transplanted with aromatase-overexpressing MCF-7 cells (MCF-7aro). Hesperetin was administered in the diet at 5000 ppm, and letrozole was injected sc at different doses. Results showed that either hesperetin or letrozole could reduce plasma estrogen level and inhibit tumor growth. Most importantly, the letrozole-induced bone loss measured as bone volume fraction was reversed by hesperetin without compromising on the deterrence of MCF-7aro tumor growth. Taken together, the present study suggested that hesperetin could be a potential cotherapeutic agent to AI.     

Is basic research providing answers if adjuvant anti-estrogen treatment of breast cancer can induce cognitive impairment?

Adjuvant treatment of cancer by chemotherapy is associated with cognitive impairment in some cancer survivors. Breast cancer patients are frequently also receiving endocrine therapy with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and/or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) to suppress the growth of estradiol sensitive breast tumors. Estrogens are well-known, however, to target brain areas involved in the regulation of cognitive behavior. In this review clinical and basic preclinical research is reviewed on the actions of estradiol, SERMs and AIs on brain and cognitive functioning to see if endocrine therapy potentially induces cognitive impairment and in that respect may contribute to the detrimental effects of chemotherapy on cognitive performance in breast cancer patients. Although many clinical studies may be underpowered to detect changes in cognitive function, current basic and clinical reports suggest that there is little evidence that AIs may have a lasting detrimental effect on cognitive performance in breast cancer patients. The clinical data on SERMs are not conclusive, but some studies do suggest that tamoxifen administration may form a risk for cognitive functioning particularly in older women. An explanation may come from basic preclinical research which indicates that tamoxifen often acts agonistic in the absence of estradiol but antagonistic in the presence of endogenous estradiol. It could be hypothesized that the negative effects of tamoxifen in older women is related to the so-called window of opportunity for estrogen. Administration of SERMs beyond this so-called window of opportunity may not be effective or might even have detrimental effects similar to estradiol.     

Recent progress in development of aromatase inhibitors

In postmenopausal women with breast cancer, aromatase, which is the enzyme converting androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol, is the rate-limiting step in estrogen biosynthesis. The currently available aromatase inhibitor, aminogluethimide, effectively blocks estrogen production and produces tumor regressions in patients previously treated with tamoxifen. This drug, however, produces frequent side effects and blocks steroidogenic steps other than the aromatase enzyme. Thus, newer aromatase inhibitors with greater potency and specificity are under intense study. More than 20 such compounds have recently been developed. In several clinical trials, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, given parenterally, has been highly active and specific for aromatase inhibition in patients with breast cancer. In two large recent studies, one-third of heavily pretreated women experienced objective tumor regression with this therapy. CGS 16949A, a newer agent, is also Phase II clinical trials. This compound is an imidazole derivative with nearly 1000-fold greater potency than aminoglutethimide. An initial Phase I study compared the potency of 0.6–16 mg daily in 12 postmenopausal women and found maximal suppression of urinary and plasma estrogens with 2 mg daily. The degree of inhibition was similar to that induced by aminoglutethimide or by surgical adrenalectomy. No CNS, hematologic or biochemical toxicity was observed. A larger Phase II study in 54 patients confirmed this high degree of potency of CGS since a plateau effect was observed at the 1.8, 2 and 4 mg daily doses. The endocrine effects were not absolutely specific as a blunting of ACTH-stimulated but not basal aldosterone levels were observed. This and other emerging aromatase inhibitors offer promise as pharmacologic methods to inhibit estrogen production specifically and without side effects.     

Menopausal estrogen deprivation activates steroid sensitive stem cells (3SC) and local estrogen biosynthesis: A model for breast cancer development

We propose a hypothesis for breast cancer (BC) development and its implications for BC prevention. We describe a model in which some breast cells function as both stem cells and steroid sensors (steroid sensitive stem cells). Estrogen receptors on those cells could be upregulated in women who had increased cumulative exposure to estrogen, leading to their progressive sensitization. At menopause, such women experience considerable decline of estrogen concentration in their blood. Consequently, the sensitized stem cells activate mechanisms of local estrogen synthesis including the activation of aromatase. The intracrine build-up of estrogen and its metabolites induces proliferation and genetic dysfunction. Eventually, a normal stem cell transforms into an estrogen-sensitive cancer stem cell that is capable of tumor initiation and delineation into other phenotypes of cancer cells. This hypothesis is supported by significant in-vitro and clinical research evidence. According to this model, we suggest that estrogen therapy could be protective against BC. Alternatively, aromatase inhibitors are expected to be effective in BC prevention. A combination of AIs and estrogen might augment the preventative merits of both drugs and maintain a good tolerability profile for long-term prevention protocols.     

Binding features of steroidal and nonsteroidal inhibitors

Aromatase is the rate-limiting enzyme in estrogen biosynthesis. As a cytochrome P450, it utilizes electrons from NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) to produce estrogen from androgen. Estrogen is a key factor in the promotion of hormone-dependent breast cancer growth. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are drugs that block estrogen synthesis, and are widely used to treat estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Structure-function experiments have been performed to study how CPR and AIs interact with aromatase to further the understanding of how these drugs elicit their effects. Our studies have revealed a strong interaction between aromatase and CPR, and that the residue K108 is situated in a region important to the interaction of aromatase with CPR. The published X-ray structure of aromatase indicates that the F221, W224 and M374 residues are located in the active site. Our site-directed mutagenesis experiments confirm their importance in the binding of the androgen substrate as well as AIs, but these residues interact differently with steroidal inhibitors (exemestane) and non-steroidal inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole). Furthermore, our results predict that the residue W224 also participates in the mechanism-based inhibition of exemestane, as time-dependent inhibition is eliminated with mutation on this residue. Together with previous research from our laboratory, this study confirms that W224, E302, D309 and S478 are important active site residues involved in the suicide mechanism of exemestane against aromatase.     

Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

This article describes the origins and evolution of "antiestrogenic" medicines for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Developing drugs that target the estrogen receptor (ER) either directly (tamoxifen) or indirectly (aromatase inhibitors) has improved the prognosis of breast cancer and significantly advanced healthcare. The development of the principles for treatment and the success of the concept, in practice, has become a model for molecular medicine and presaged the current testing of numerous targeted therapies for all forms of cancer. The translational research with tamoxifen to target the ER with the appropriate duration (5 years) of adjuvant therapy has contributed to the falling national death rates from breast cancer. Additionally, exploration of the endocrine pharmacology of tamoxifen and related nonsteroidal antiestrogen (e.g. keoxifene now known as raloxifene) resulted in the laboratory recognition of selective ER modulation and the translation of the concept to use raloxifene for the prevention of osteoporosis and breast cancer. However, the extensive evaluation of tamoxifen treatment revealed small but significant side effects such as endometrial cancer, blood clots and the development of acquired resistance. The solution was to develop drugs that targeted the aromatase enzyme specifically to prevent the conversion of androstenedione to estrone and subsequently estradiol. The successful translational research with the suicide inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (known as formestane) pioneered the development of a range of oral aromatase inhibitors that are either suicide inhibitors (exemestane) or competitive inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole) of the aromatase enzyme. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors is proving effective and is associated with reduction in the incidence of endometrial cancer and blood clots when compared with tamoxifen and there is also limited cross resistance so treatment can be sequential. Current clinical trials are addressing the value of aromatase inhibitors as chemopreventive agents for postmenopausal women.     

Chemoprevention with aromatase inhibitors--trial strategies

Estrogen and its catechol metabolites from both the circulation and synthesized within the breast are important in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Blocking estrogen's effects on the breast with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS) is an ongoing strategy. Thus, tamoxifen and raloxifene reduce risk as monotherapy. Aromatase (estrogen synthetase) inhibitors are a logical alternative to SERMS. To date, SERMS have demonstrated reduction only in estrogen–progesterone receptor positive cancers without reduction in receptor negative tumors. By inhibiting the parent estrogens and their catechol metabolites, true prevention of cancer initiation might occur and reduction not only in the receptor positive but also negative tumors might result. Ongoing adjuvant breast cancer trials are exploring aromatase inhibitors as alternatives to tamoxifen, or in sequence or in combination with tamoxifen. Relative efficacies including reduction in contralateral breast cancer, toxicities and end-organ effects and impact on quality of life, are being explored. Data from these trials will help to guide future chemoprevention strategies. Proof of principal trials in ‘high risk’ cohorts such as premalignant breast lesions, dense screening mammograms, high plasma estradiol levels or increased bone density are already ongoing. Issues such as dose, schedule, therapeutic index and mono versus combination therapy are important to define.     

Inhibition of aromatase: insights from recent studies

Aromatase is the rate limiting enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens. Blockade of this step allows treatment of diseases that are dependent upon estrogen. Over the past two decades, highly potent and specific aromatase inhibitors have been developed which block total body aromatization by over 99%. An important recent question is whether aromatase inhibitors are superior to the antiestrogens for treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. The third generation aromatase inhibitors have been compared to tamoxifen for the treatment of breast cancer in the advanced, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. All of these studies suggest the superiority of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen. The mechanism responsible for the superiority of the aromatase inhibitors relates to the estrogen agonistic effects of tamoxifen. During exposure to estrogen deprived conditions and to tamoxifen, breast cancer cells adapt and upregulate the MAP kinase and PI-3 kinase pathways. These growth factor signaling pathways potentiate the estrogen agonistic properties of tamoxifen. Data from a large adjuvant therapy trial (ATAC trial) provide evidence that the aromatase inhibitors may also be superior for breast cancer prevention. The mechanism for superiority in this setting probably relates to the genotoxic effects of estradiol metabolites. The aromatase inhibitors may be also useful for the treatment of endometriosis and for ovulation induction as evidenced by preliminary data. The recent advances in development of the aromatase inhibitors clearly demonstrate the utility of these agents for treatment of breast cancer and potentially for other indications.     

Breast cancer prevention--clinical trials strategies involving aromatase inhibitors

Estrogens and their metabolites have been implicated in both the initiation and the prevention of breast cancer. The reduction in breast cancer incidence seen in the tamoxifen arms of the four prospective trials to date has established the proof of principle that antagonizing estrogen is a potential means of reducing breast cancer risk. However, the areas to improve on these results include: (a) enhanced efficacy, (b) reduction in the incidence of receptor-negative tumors, (c) improved overall and endocrinological side effects, and (d) improved function on end-organs other than the breast. The aromatase inhibitors offer the potential to achieve these goals in part in the following ways: (a) greater reduction in risk of disease as evidenced by superior efficacy in advanced breast cancer and by inhibition of both initiation and promotion of breast cancer, (b) reduction in receptor-negative tumors by synergy with COX-2 inhibitors resulting in growth factor inhibition, anti-angiogenesis and inhibition of tumor-associated aromatase expression, (c) fewer vasomotor and urogenital abnormalities, and (d) reduced thromboembolism and cardiovascular complications and satisfactory effects on bone metabolism. Important differences may exist between non-steroidal reversible inhibitors and steroidal irreversible inactivators in particular related to the androgenic/anabolic effects of the steroidal inactivators. Pilot studies of aromatase inhibitors described elsewhere in this session have begun in healthy women with dense mammography, or a high-risk genetic and/or histocytopathologic profile, to determine potential efficacy, as well as effects on end-organ function. A number of phase three trials with aromatase inhibitors are also underway or in planning. Among these are the BRCA 1 and 2 study of exemestane versus placebo in unaffected postmenopausal carriers, the International Breast Intervention Study 2 (IBIS 2) of anastrozole versus placebo in women with a high-risk profile, and the National Cancer Institute of Canada’s Clinical Trial Group (NCIC CTG) study of exemestane with or without celecoxib versus placebo in women at risk of the disease. For premenopausal women, combination strategies of gonadotrophin agonists and aromatase inhibitors are being investigated. The potential of using low doses of aromatase inhibitors to lower “in breast” estrogen levels without unduly perturbing plasma concentrations is also being explored. The potential of the aromatase gene functioning as an oncogene within the breast may be tied to breast density which in turn may represent both a selection tool for elevated risk and an intermediate marker of prevention. The strong link between postmenopausal estrogen levels and breast cancer risk suggests the possibility that plasma estrogen levels may be a useful intermediate marker of prevention. The aromatase inhibitors offer us the first ever tool to render women virtually free of estrogen and are potentially an exciting tool for the prevention of breast cancer.