幽门螺杆菌根除失败后两种四联方案根除率的疗效对比

目的:对比两种不同的四联疗法对幽门螺杆菌根除失败后的根除率,选择可以有效弥补传统三联疗法的幽门螺杆菌根除失败措施的四联疗法。方法:选择2010年8月到2012年8月期间在我院住院治疗的幽门螺杆菌根除失败后患者90例作为研究对象。随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组的患者采取序贯疗法,对照组的患者采取标准四联疗法。对比两组的根除率以及临床疗效。结果:实验组患者的根除率为86.7%,对照组患者根除率为51.0%;实验组患者的临床总有效率为95.6%,对照组的临床有效率为77.8%;实验组的不良反应的总发生率为4.4%,对照组不良反应总发生率为20.0%。两组比较差异明显,P均0.05,具有统计学意义。结论:序贯疗法对幽门螺杆菌根除失败后的根除率以及疗效高于标准四联疗法。     

A modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone for Helicobacter pylori eradication after sequential therapy failure

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication has still remained a challenge, especially in case of failure to novel treatments. Therefore, we designed a study to evaluate the effects of a modified bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone on a group of patients whose sequential therapy had been unsuccessful. Materials and Methods: Thirty‐six H. pylori‐positive patients who had previously failed a clarithromycin‐containing sequential therapy enrolled the study. They received pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid), amoxicillin (1 g‐bid), and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg‐bid) for 2 weeks and furazolidone (200 mg‐bid) just during the first week. Eight weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was reassessed using C14‐urea breath test. Results: Thirty five patients completed the study. H. pylori eradication rates were 80.6% (95% CI = 67.6–93.5) and 82.9% (95% CI = 70.6–95.2) according to intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses, respectively. All patients had excellent compliance to treatment, and no one interrupted therapy owing to adverse effects. Conclusion: Regarding the eradication rate (>80%), low price, and very low adverse effects, a 2‐week bismuth‐containing quadruple regimen including a short course of furazolidone can be an encouraging regimen for second‐line H. pylori eradication in case of sequential therapy failure. Possibly, it can be improved by alterations in dose, dosing intervals, and/or duration.     

四联疗法和序贯疗法治疗服用非甾体类消炎药人群幽门螺杆菌感染的临 床对照研究

目的:对比四联疗法和序贯疗法对根除服用非甾体类消炎药(NSAID)人群幽门螺杆菌(Hp),改善其消化道不良症状及促进消化性溃疡愈合的临床效果。方法:对有消化不良症状的服用非甾体类消炎药物患者行胃镜检查、快速尿激酶及13C呼气试验检查,将155例幽门螺杆菌阳性合并有慢性胃炎或消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组,A组采用四联疗法,B组采用序贯疗法。A组予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林+枸橼酸铋钾治疗10天;B组前5天予雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林,后5天予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+甲硝唑。治疗结束后,予雷贝拉唑和胃黏膜保护剂治疗8周。停药4周后,复查胃镜、13C呼气试验,观察和比较两组Hp根除率、消化不良症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率。结果:A、B两组Hp根除率分别为(ITT分析:86.7%和81.9%;PP分析:87.8%和84.3%);症状缓解率为(81.9%对79.2%);胃溃疡愈合率为(68.8%对66.7%),十二指肠球部溃疡的愈合率为(68.2%对70.0%),两组患者间Hp根除率、症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率比较均未见明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。四联疗法组和序贯疗法组不良反应的发生率分别为4.9%和4.3%。两组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:四联疗法和序贯疗法对长期服用非甾体类消炎药物人群的Hp根除疗效、消化不良症状的缓解及促进溃疡愈合的治疗作用均无明显差异。     

黄连素四联方案补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的有效性和安全性

目的:探索黄连素四联方案用于幽门螺杆菌感染根除失败患者补救治疗的有效性及安全性。方法:将经四联方案初次根除治疗失败并自愿接受补救治疗的130例患者按纳入顺序,以1:1的比例分配治疗,随机接受14天黄连素四联(埃索美拉唑20mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2/d+黄连素300 mg 3/d)或四环素四联(埃索美拉唑20 mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+四环素750 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg,2/d)方案的治疗。所有患者均于治疗14天及治疗结束至少28天后随诊,详细记录患者症状及不良反应情况。治疗结束至少28天后进行13C尿素呼气试验来判断幽门螺杆菌根除情况。结果:65例接受黄连素四联根除治疗,65例接受四环素四联方案治疗。两组分别有6例和4例患者因不良反应服药依从性小于80%,其余患者均完成了14天的治疗。黄连素组和四环素组的幽门螺杆菌根除率ITT分析分别为76.9%(50/65)和81.5%(53/65),P=0.520;PP分析分别为84.7%(50/59)和86.9%(53/61),P=0.739。黄连素组和四环素组不良事件总体发生率分别为49.2%和41.5%,P=0.370。结论:黄连素四联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌感染的二次根除治疗,根除率较高,未明显增加不良事件发生率,是有效及安全的补救治疗方案。     

Effectiveness and safety of repeated quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of second-line quadruple therapy: repeated quadruple therapy as a third-line therapy

Backgrounds: Quadruple therapy using a proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline is a standard second‐line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection, achieving an eradication rate of about 80% in Korea. A standard third‐line therapy is not currently established, although various protocols have been proposed. We performed this study to evaluate the effectiveness of a retrial with quadruple therapy before starting a third‐line treatment with new drugs. Materials and Methods: In 80 of 746 patients treated with a second‐line quadruple therapy at the Korea University Ansan Hospital between January 2002 and September 2010, treatment for H. pylori had failed, and 45 of these patients were eligible for this study. Eradication of H. pylori was assessed by repeated endoscopy or by the ¹³C‐urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. The patients with treatment failure were treated again with quadruple regimen for 2 weeks and reevaluated for treatment effectiveness and safety. Results: The eradication rate with second‐line quadruple therapy was 86.9%. Of the 80 patients who failed treatment for H. pylori with the initial second‐line quadruple therapy, 64 patients were treated again with the same regimen. Of the 45 retreated patients in this study, three patients were lost to follow‐up and two complied poorly with medication. The eradication rate in the 40 patients retreated was 75.0% at per‐protocol analysis. Seventeen patients experienced mild adverse events. Conclusions: A retrial of quadruple therapy before use of a third‐line therapy may be safe and effective for patients who fail to respond to second‐line quadruple therapy.     

Quadruple therapy with medications containing either rufloxacin or furazolidone as a rescue regimen in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-infected dyspepsia patients: a randomized pilot study

Background: The eradication rates of first‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection are not satisfactory. Various regimens including quadruple therapies have been recommended as rescue therapies after the first H. pylori eradication attempt failed. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between quadruple therapies with medications containing either rufloxacin or levofloxacin in the Chinese nonulcer dyspepsia patients infected with H. pylori. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients after an unsuccessful 10‐day standard triple therapy were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to receive a 14‐day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth citrate, and furazolidone in combination with either rufloxacin (Group Ruf, n = 70) or levofloxacin (Group Lev, n = 68). The H. pylori eradication was evaluated by ¹³C‐urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after therapy was completed. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven patients (65 in Group Ruf and 62 in Group Lev) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rates in Group Ruf were 81.4% for intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis and 87.7% for per‐protocol (PP) analysis. The rates were statistically significantly higher than those in Group Lev (66.2% and 72.6%) (p < 0.05). There were no severe adverse effects found in these two groups. Conclusions: Fourteen‐day quadruple therapy with a combination of proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth citrate, furazolidone, and rufloxacin is considered an effective and safe rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple treatment.     

Second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: 10-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy versus 2-week quadruple therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of 10-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy versus 2-week quadruple therapy for the second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two patients who had failed previous H. pylori eradication on standard triple therapy were randomized to one of two regimens: 1, moxifloxacin (400 mg q.d.), amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.), and esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) for 10 days (the 10MEA group), or 2, esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.), tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate (300 mg q.i.d.), metronidazole (500 mg t.i.d.), and tetracycline 500 mg (q.i.d.) for 14 days (the 14EBMT group). The eradication rates, drug compliances, and side-effect rates of these two regimens were compared. RESULTS: Eradication rates by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses in the 10MEA and 14EMBT groups were 71.9% and 82.6%, and 71.7% and 90.5% (p = .973 and .321), respectively. The 10MEA group was significantly superior to the 14EMBT group in terms of side-effect rates (12.2% vs. 39.6%, p = .001), and discontinuation rates due to side-effects were lower in the 10MEA group than in the 14EMBT group (0.7% vs. 13.2%, p < .001). Moreover, compliance was higher in the 10MEA group (94.2% (131/139)) than in the 14EBMT group (83.0% (44/53)) (p = .014). CONCLUSION: The 10-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy was found to have a high eradication rate with few side-effects and good drug compliance. These findings suggest that this regimen is a safe and effective second-line treatment option for H. pylori infection in Korea.     

Impact of Quadruple Regimen of Clarithromycin Added to Metronidazole-Containing Triple Therapy Against Helicobacter pylori Infection Following Clarithromycin-Containing Triple-Therapy Failure

Background: The establishment of an optimal second-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection is required. Although quadruple therapy should overcome resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, the effects of a quadruple regimen in second-line therapy are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy composed of proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin plus metronidazole with the combined additive effects of clarithromycin as a second-line quadruple therapy against H. pylori infection.
Materials and Methods: Participants were 104 patients in whom first-line therapy containing proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin failed. Before starting second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strain for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (10 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and metronidazole (250 mg), either with clarithromycin (200 mg; RAMC group) or without (RAM group); all treatments were administered twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by ¹³C-urea breath tests performed 2 to 3 months post-therapy.
Results: As shown by intention-to-treat/per-protocol analyses, the cure rates for H. pylori infection were 88.5%/93.9% and 82.7%/84.3% for the RAMC and RAM groups. Although the study probably had an insufficient power to show a significant difference between the cure rates of the two regimens, the eradication rates showed a clear trend in favor of the RAMC group. There were no severe side-effects in any group.
Conclusions: In Japan, the RAMC regimen is thought to be a promising alternative strategy for second-line eradication of H. pylori infection.     

Levofloxacin- vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate-containing therapy after H. pylori treatment failure

AIM: Ranitidine bismuth citrate and levofloxacin-based regimen may be an alternative to quadruple therapy after Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. Our aim was to compare two 7-day triple second-line regimens containing ranitidine bismuth citrate or levofloxacin. METHODS: Patients in whom a first eradication trial with omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin had failed were randomized to receive 7-day treatment with: 1, ranitidine bismuth citrate (400 mg b.i.d.), tetracycline (500 mg q.i.d.), and metronidazole (250 mg q.i.d.), or 2, levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and omeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.). Cure rates were evaluated by (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were included: 50 received the ranitidine bismuth citrate regimen, and 50 the levofloxacin one. Groups were comparable in terms of demographic variables. Two percent of the patients (one in each group) did not return for follow up. Compliance was similar in both groups (90% took all the medications correctly). Side-effects (only mild/moderate) in the two groups were also comparable (38% with ranitidine bismuth citrate and 36% with levofloxacin). Per-protocol cure rates were 69% (95% CI = 54-80%) in the ranitidine bismuth citrate group, and 71% (57-82%) in the levofloxacin one. Intention-to-treat cure rates were, respectively, 68% (59-79%) and 68% (59-79%) (nonstatistically significant differences). CONCLUSIONS: Both 7-day ranitidine bismuth citrate- and levofloxacin-containing second-line regimens represent alternatives to quadruple therapy in patients with previous omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure.     

Rabeprazole Can Overcome the Impact of CYP2C19 Polymorphism on Quadruple Therapy

Objectives: The prospective study was designed to clarify the impact of CYP2C19 on quadruple therapies and survey the efficacies of rabeprazole‐based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapies. Patients and Methods: From January 2007 to March 2009, 1055 H. pylori‐infected patients received standard triple regimens (proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin). Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 865 (81.9%) subjects. One hundred ninety eradication‐failure patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a 7‐day eradication therapy. Ninety‐six patients were treated with esomeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (EB), while 94 patients were treated with rabeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (RB). Follow‐up endoscopy was done 16 weeks later to assess the treatment response. Patients’ responses, CYP2C19 genotypes, and antibiotics resistances were also examined. Results: Intention‐to‐treat analysis revealed that RB had better eradication rates than EB (EB: 72.9%; 95% CI: 64.9–80.9% and RB: 78.7%; 95% CI 72.5–84.9%) (p value = .543). Per‐protocol results were EB = 75.3%; 95% CI: 70.3–80.3% and RB = 85.1%; 95% CI: 80.6–89.6% (p value = .0401). Both regimens had similar compliance (p value = 0.155) and adverse events (p value = 0.219). We also surveyed those patients without resistance of any antibiotics. RB still showed better outcome than EB. Our data showed that esomeprazole‐based regimen and CYP2C19 Hom EM genotype were important predictors for eradication failure. Conclusions: In quadruple therapy, rabeprazole‐based regimens had better efficacy than esomeprazole‐based regimens. CYP2C19 polymorphism also played an important role in quadruple therapy. It seems advisable to change PPI to rabeprazole in second‐line quadruple therapy.     

A real-world exploratory study on the feasibility of vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies

Background

The treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a challenge for those who cannot use amoxicillin.

Objective

To evaluate the eradication rate and adverse effects of vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy as first-line and rescue treatment regimens used in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies.

Design

Patients enrolled were those who were H. pylori-positive with selected conditions: (1) allergic to penicillin, either naïve to treatment or had failed before; or (2) failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies. All enrolled patients accepted 14-day vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy (VT dual therapy) as follows: vonoprazan (20 mg b.i.d.) and tetracycline (500 mg t.i.d. [body weight < 70 kg] or 500 mg q.i.d. [body weight ≥ 70 kg]). H. pylori status was evaluated by ¹³C-urease breath test 6 weeks after treatment. All adverse effects were recorded. Some patients underwent bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Results

A total of 62 patients were enrolled; 18 of them received VT dual therapy as first-line treatment, 44 patients received VT dual therapy as rescue treatment. Overall, 58 of 62 patients achieved successful eradication (93.5%), while all involved (100%,18/18) succeeded in the first-line treatment group and 40 cases (90.9%, 40/44) succeeded in the rescue treatment group. Sixty-one (61/62, 98.4%) patients completed the whole course of treatment. Adverse events occurred in 6 patients (6/62, 9.7%), while one patient quit because of skin rash. All adverse effects were mild and relieved spontaneously after H. pylori treatment. Five patients achieved successful H. pylori culture, and all strains isolated were sensitive to tetracycline.

Conclusions

For the treatment of H. pylori infection in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies, a 14-day vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy was effective and safe as first-line and rescue treatment in our study. Further study is warranted to verify its efficacy, especially for those who cannot use amoxicillin.     

Efficacy of two rabeprazole/gatifloxacin-based triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of two novel treatment regimens consisting of gatifloxacin (400 mg daily), amoxicillin (1 g twice daily), and rabeprazole 20 mg once (RAG20) or twice daily (RAG40) given for 7 days in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: Eligible patients undergoing endoscopy and having a positive rapid urease assay for H. pylori were enrolled in this open-label trial. Gastric biopsies from a random cohort of patients were cultured for H. pylori and in vitro susceptibility to gatifloxacin and amoxicillin was performed using the E-test. Compliance and side-effects were evaluated by phone calls. (14)C-urea breath tests were performed a minimum of 4 weeks after therapy and 3 weeks after any acid suppressive therapy. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients, 52 in each group (40 females and 64 males; mean age 45.7 years) were enrolled sequentially. Eradication occurred in 43 out of 52 patients in RAG20 group (both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis: 83%; 95% CI: 72-93%) and in 48 of 52 patients in the RAG40 group (both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis: 92%; 95% CI: 85-99%). Seven patients in the RAG40 group who had previously failed one or more treatment regimens for H. pylori were cured. No significant adverse effects were reported. All 50 recovered H. pylori strains were susceptible to amoxicillin and gatifloxacin in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day regimen of gatifloxacin-rabeprazole-amoxicillin is effective eradication therapy for H. pylori. The use of rabeprazole twice daily results in superior eradication rates including cases of failed primary therapy. This new regimen is simple, well-tolerated, and may lead to higher compliance and lower costs.     

铋剂四联疗法联合不同药物对 幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效

目的分析铋剂四联疗法联合不同药物对幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效。方法入选患者依据治疗方案不同进行分组,其中A组患者采用铋剂四联方案(1种PPI+1种铋剂+2种抗生素)进行治疗,B组患者采用铋剂四联+思联康治疗,C组患者采用铋剂四联+荆花胃康治疗。3组患者均于根除治疗结束停药1个月后复查~(13)C呼气试验以评估疗效。对各方案的H.pylori根除率进行评比,并分析其临床疗效和成本-效益情况。结果按ITT集分析时,C组与A组患者根除率比较差异无统计学意义(χ~2=3.642,P=0.056),B组与A组和C组患者比较差异无统计学意义(χ~2=3.209、0.130,P0.05)。按PP集分析时,C组患者根除率最高,A组患者根除率最低,B、C组与A组患者比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2=4.620、4.419,P0.05),B、C两组根除率比较差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.062,P0.05)。A组、B组和C组患者不良反应发生率按PP集计算分别为50.0%、7.9%和26.7%,3组患者不良反应发生率两两比较差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。成本-效益分析结果显示B组患者的成本-效果比值最小。结论综合有效性、安全性及成本-效益比分析,铋剂四联+思联康方案具有H.pylori根除率高,患者不良反应发生率低,成本效益比低的优势,提示此方案为本研究的最佳方案,值得临床推广应用。     

Comparison of two management strategies for Helicobacter pylori treatment: clinical study and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND: First-line proton pump inhibitor-based triple and quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication present similar levels of efficacy. Cross-over treatment (quadruple following triple failure, and triple following quadruple failure) seems the most sensible approach to treatment failures, but the two strategies -'quadruple first' versus 'triple first'- have not been previously compared. The aims of our study were to assess the usefulness and the cost-effectiveness of the two treatment strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-nine out of 344 patients included in a previous study comparing triple therapy - 7 days of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin twice a day - with quadruple therapy - 7 days of omeprazole twice a day, plus tetracycline, metronidazole and bismuth subcitrate three times a day - failed initial treatment and were assigned to cross-over therapy. Cure was determined by urea breath test. A decision analysis was performed to compare the two eradication strategies. RESULTS: Intention to treat cure rates were 46% (10/22 patients; 95% CI 24-68%) for second-line triple therapy and 63% (17/27 patients; 95% CI 42-81%) for second-line quadruple therapy. Per protocol cure rates were 71% and 85%, respectively. Intention to treat cure rates were 87% (95% CI 81-92%) for the 'triple first' versus 86% (95% CI 80-91%) for the 'quadruple first' strategy (p = .87). The 'quadruple first' strategy was more cost-effective. The incremental cost of 'triple first' strategy per person was 19 in the low-cost area and 65 US dollars in the high-cost area. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of 'triple first' and 'quadruple first' strategies is similar, although the latter seems slightly more cost-effective.     

A comparison between sequential therapy and a modified bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Iran: a randomized clinical trial

Background: Sequential regimens have been recently reported to be superior to the standard triple therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, but most of these studies were performed in Europe and data from developing countries are lacking. So we designed a study to compare a sequential regimen with a bismuth‐based quadruple therapy that contains a short course of furazolidone, in Iran. Methods: Two hundred and ninety‐six patients with duodenal ulcer and naïve H. pylori infection were randomized into two groups: 148 patients received (PAB‐F) pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid), amoxicillin (1 g‐bid), and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg‐bid) for 2 weeks and furazolidone (200 mg‐bid) just during the first week. And 148 patients received (PA‐CT) pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid) for 10 days, amoxicillin (1 g‐bid) for the first 5 days, and clarithromycin (500 mg‐bid) plus tinidazole (500 mg‐bid) just during the second 5 days. C¹⁴‐urea breath test was performed 8 weeks after the treatment. Results: Two hundred and sixty‐one patients completed the study (137 patients in the PA‐CT and 124 in the PAB‐F group). The results were not statistically different between the two groups in the eradication rates and the severity of side effects. The intention to treat eradication rate was 80.4% in the PAB‐F group and 83.7% in the PA‐CT group. Per‐protocol eradication rates were 88.7% and 89.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Because the two regimens showed acceptable and similar abilities in H. pylori eradication and because of much higher cost of clarithromycin in Iran, the furazolidone containing regimen seems to be superior. Further modifications of sequential therapies are needed to make them ideal regimens in developing countries.     

酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊联合标准四联疗法 清除幽门螺杆菌感染的临床研究

目的评估酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊(阿泰宁)联合标准四联疗法清除幽门螺杆菌的临床疗效。方法收集2017年1月至2018年1月就诊于甘肃省人民医院消化科门诊,经胃镜及尿素-14 C呼气试验检查诊断为幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性胃炎患者220例为研究对象并随机分为两组。其中对照组患者给予标准四联疗法,疗程2周。观察组患者在标准四联疗法基础上加用酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊,疗程2周。停药1个月后复查尿素-14 C呼气试验,分析患者临床疗效和不良反应发生率。结果 (1)观察组患者幽门螺旋杆菌清除率(88.18%)明显高于对照组(76.36%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。(2)观察组的不良反应发生率(8.18%)低于对照组(26.37%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论酪酸梭菌活菌胶囊联合标准四联疗法清除幽门螺杆菌的疗效显著,值得临床推广。     

Moxifloxacin-tetracycline-lansoprazole triple therapy for first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective study

Aim: To document the efficacy and tolerability of 14‐day moxifloxacine–tetracycline–lansoprazole (MTL) regimens for Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication as a first‐line therapy. Method: Fifty‐six Hp‐positive patients were enrolled. Patients were considered eligible for the study if they underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and Hp infection was diagnosed through histologic examination of antral and body bioptic samples. Primary end point of this study was to evaluate the eradication rate of 14‐day MTL regimen therapies. Hp eradication was assessed using the 13C urea breath test performed. All patients were asked to fill in a validated questionnaire to report therapy‐related side effects. Each symptom was graded from absent or present. Results: Fifty‐six patients (29 men and 27 women) were enrolled. The studied therapeutic regimens were completed by 96.4% patients. Two dropouts occurred in the MTL group because of side effects. The eradication rate in MTL regimens was 55.4%. The overall prevalence of side effects was high in the MTL group. Conclusion: The MTL regimen failed to achieve the recommended eradication rates and had higher adverse effect rate. Hence, MTL regimen does not seem to be a suitable choice as a first‐line Hp eradication therapy.     

Colloidal Bismuth Pectin: An Alternative to Bismuth Subcitrate for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori– Positive Duodenal Ulcer

Background. Bismuth triple therapy provides consistently good results in Helicobacter pylori eradication worldwide, whereas quadruple therapy using a combination of omeprazole and bismuth triple regimen has produced cure rates in excess of 90%. The prevalence of metronidazole-resistant strains was 26.8% in our area. Colloidal bismuth pectin (CBP) is a new, lower-priced bismuth salt made in China. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of CBP triple and quadruple regimens in the treatment of H. pylori–positive duodenal ulcer. Materials and Methods. In this prospective trial, 205 patients with H. pylori–positive duodenal ulcer were allocated randomly to receive one of four regimens: metronidazole, 200 mg; amoxicillin, 250 mg; and colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS), 120 mg (group 1), or CBP, 100 mg qid (group 2) for 2 weeks, then continued CBS, 240 mg, or CBP, 200 mg bid for a further 2 weeks. A quadruple regimen using a combination of omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and CBS triple therapy (group 3) or CBP triple therapy (group 4), respectively, was given to patients for 1 week, followed by omeprazole, 20 mg once daily for a further 3 weeks. Further endoscopy was performed at least 4 weeks after cessation of the treatment. H. pylori status was determined by histology, a ¹⁴C urea breath test, and a urease test. Results. The per-protocol H. pylori cure rates were 85% (22 of 26 patients), 90% (35 of 39), 96% (46 of 48), and 95% (75 of 79) for groups 1 through 4. In the intention-to-treat analysis, cure rates were 79% (22 of 28), 83% (35 of 42), 90% (46 of 51), and 89% (75 of 84), respectively. The cure rates of quadruple therapy were higher than those of triple therapy; an 8.2% difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–18.7%). The ulcer-healing rates were 88%, 87%, 98%, and 97%, respectively, for groups 1 through 4. The ulcer pain was relieved more rapidly in quadruple- than in triple-therapy regimens. Two patients discontinued treatment prematurely owing to drug-related side effects. Conclusion. One-week quadruple therapy is highly effective and safe in H. pylori eradication in Chinese patients. CBP is as effective as CBS.     

Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Metronidazole and tetracycline-based second-line quadruple therapy, widely used for Helicobacter pylori infection, often ends up in failure due to antibiotic resistance and poor compliance in Korea. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as an alternative second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 85 patients infected with H. pylori, in whom initial proton pump inhibitor triple therapy had failed. They were randomized to receive the following 7-day therapy: 1, moxifloxacin 400 mg q.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d.; and 2, esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg q.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. Eradication rates, drug compliance, and side-effect rates of each group were evaluated. RESULTS: The eradication rates were 75.6 and 83.8% with moxifloxacin triple therapy, and 54.5 and 72.7% with quadruple therapy by intention-to-treat (p = .042) and per-protocol analyses (p = .260), respectively. Moxifloxacin triple therapy was significantly superior to quadruple therapy in terms of side-effect rates (p = .039). Compliance for therapy, i.e., the percentage of tablets taken (> 85%), was 90.2 and 75.0%, numerically higher in moxifloxacin triple therapy group than in quadruple therapy group, but without statistical difference (p = .065). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin-based triple therapy showed high eradication rates with few side effects and good drug compliance, suggesting this regimen could be a safe and effective option as second-line therapy for H. pylori infection in Korea.     

Results from the pediatric European register for treatment of Helicobacter pylori (PERTH)

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data on the eradication treatment for childhood Helicobacter pylori are scanty. A register was established on the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) website to collect data on treatment performed by European pediatricians to ascertain what is practiced in the field. SUBJECTS: From January 2001 to December 2002, information on 597 children were entered by 23 European Centers, but only data of 518 treated children were completed and analyzed (86.7%, 262 male subjects, median age 9 years, range 1-14). According to their nationality, 226 children were from Southern Europe, 132 from Eastern Europe, 68 from Western Europe, and 4 from northern Europe, 68 from North Africa, and 20 from Asia. At endoscopy, 454 children had gastritis and 64 had ulcer (12.3%). Antibiotic sensitivity, tested in 361 cases, revealed 18% clarithromycin-resistant and 19% metronidazole-resistant H. pylori strains. RESULTS: Treatment was performed for 1 week in 388 and for 2 weeks in 130 children. Antibiotics were associated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in 345 and with bismuth in 121 children. Triple therapy was given to 485 children, dual therapy to 26, quadruple to 7. Follow-up data, by (13)C-Urea-Breath Test or histology or both, were available for 480 children. Overall eradication rate was 65.6%, significantly higher in children with ulcer (79.7%) than without (63.9%, p = .001). When given as first treatment, bismuth-containing triple therapies were more efficacious than PPI-containing ones (77% versus 64%, p = .02, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.1-3.3). Twenty-seven different treatment regimens were used, but only six were administered to at least 18 children (range 18-157). There was no difference between treatments given for 1 or 2 weeks, or given as first or second therapies. CONCLUSION: European pediatricians entering data in the register used 27 different regimens. Bismuth-containing therapies resulted in higher eradication rate. Omeprazole-containing triple therapies were the most used although their efficacy was low. Therapies recommended for adults do not appear to be suitable for children.