External electric field effects on prompt and delayed fluorescence in chloroplasts

An electric field pulse was applied to a suspension of osmotically swollen spinach chloroplasts after illumination with a saturating flash in the presence of DCMU. In addition to the stimulation of delayed fluorescence by the electric field, discovered by Arnold and Azzi (Arnold, W.A. and Azzi, R. (1971) Photochem. Photobiol. 14, 233–240) a sudden drop in fluorescence yield was observed. The kinetics of this fluorescence change were identical to those of the integrated delayed fluorescence emission induced by the pulse. The S-state dependence of the stimulated emission was very similar to that of the normal luminescence. We assume that the membrane potential generated by the pulse changes the activation energy for the back reaction in Photosystem II. On this basis, and making use of data we obtained earlier from electrochromic absorbance changes induced by the pulse, the kinetics of the field-induced prompt and delayed fluorescence changes, and also the amplitude of the fluorescence decrease, which was about 12% for a nearly saturating pulse, are explained. Our results indicate that in those reaction centers where a decrease of the activation energy occurs the effect of a pulse can be quite spectacular: the back reaction, which normally takes seconds, is completed in a few hundred microseconds when a sufficiently strong pulse is applied. Measurements of the polarization of the stimulated luminescence supported the interpretation given above.Only 2.8% of the back reaction was found to proceed via transition of reexcited chlorophyll to the ground state, both during the field pulse and in the absence of the field.     

The high-energy state of the thylakoid system as indicated by chlorophyll fluorescence and chloroplast shrinkage

Certain long-term fluorescence phenomena observed in intact leaves of higher plants and in isolated chloroplasts show a reverse relationship to light-induced absorbance changes at 535 nm (“chloroplast shrinkage”).

1. 1. In isolated chloroplasts with intact envelopes strong fluorescence quenching upon prolonged illumination with red light is accompanied by an absorbance increase. Both effects are reversed by uncoupling with cyclohexylammonium chloride.

2. 2. The fluorescence quenching is reversed in the dark with kinetics very similar to those of the dark decay of chloroplast shrinkage.

3. 3. In intact leaves under strong illumination with red light in CO₂-free air a low level of variable fluorescence and a strong shrinkage response are observed. Carbon dioxide was found to increase fluorescence and to inhibit shrinkage.

4. 4. Under nitrogen, CO₂ caused fluorescence quenching and shrinkage increase at low concentrations. At higher CO₂ levels fluorescence was increased and shrinkage decreased.

5. 5. In the presence of CO₂, the steady-state yield of fluorescence was lower under nitrogen than under air, whereas chloroplast shrinkage was stimulated in nitrogen and suppressed in air.

6. 6. These results demonstrate that the fluorescence yield does not only depend on the redox state of the quencher Q, but to a large degree also on the high-energy state of the thylakoid system associated with photophosphorylation.

A one microsecond component of chlorophyll luminescence suggesting a primary acceptor of system II of photosynthesis different from Q

The kinetics of the luminescence of chlorophyll a in Chlorella vulgaris were studied in the time range from 0.2 μs to 20 μs after a short saturating flash ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25}\text{ns}$) under various pretreatment including anaerobiosis, flashes, continuous illumination and various additions. A 1 μs luminescence component probably originating from System II was found of which the relative amplitude was maximum under anaerobic conditions for reaction centers in the state SPQ^? before the flash, about one third for centers in the state S⁺PQ^? or SPQ before the flash, and about one tenth for centers in the state S⁺PQ before the flash. S is the secondary donor complex with zero charge; S⁺ is the secondary donor complex with 1 to 3 positive charges; P, the primary donor, is the photoactive chlorophyll a, P-680, of reaction center 2; Q^? is the reduced acceptor of System II, Q. Under aerobic conditions, where an endogenous quencher presumably was active, the luminescence was reduced by a factor two.The 1 μs decay of the luminescence is probably caused by the disappearance of P⁺ formed in the laser flash according to the reaction ZP⁺ → Z⁺P in which Z is the molecule which donates an electron to P⁺ and which is part of S. After addition of hydroxylamine, the 1 μs luminescence component changed with the incubation time exponentially (τ = 27 s) into a 30 μs component; during the same time, the variable fluorescence yield, measured 9 μs after the laser flash, decreased by a factor 2 with the same time constant. Hereafter in a second much slower phase the fluorescence yield decreased as an exponential function of the incubation time to about the dark value; meanwhile the 30 μs luminescence increased about 50% with the same time constant (τ = 7 min). Heat treatment abolished both luminescence components.The 1 μs luminescence component saturated at about the same energy as the System II fluorescence yield 60 μs after the laser flash and as the slower luminescence components. From the observation that the amplitude is maximum if the laser flash is given when the fluorescence yield is high after prolonged anaerobic conditions (state SQ^?), we conclude that the 1 μs luminescence is probably caused by the reaction

$\text{PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv →}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→ PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv}$

in which W is an acceptor different from Q. The presence of S⁺ reduced the luminescence amplitude to about one third. Two models are discussed, one with W as an intermediate between P and Q and another, which gives the best interpretation, with W on a side path.     

Complementarity of ATP-induced and light-induced absorbance changes around 515 nm

A comparative study of the light-induced and the ATP-induced changes of P-515 absorbance gave the following results: (1) Following light activation of the latent ATP-hydrolase, ATP can induce a ΔA(515) of about the same size as that observed either in continuous light or by a saturating light flash. The ATP-induced ΔA(515) is stable in the dark as long as ATP is hydrolysed. (2) Any preceding ATP-induced ΔA(515) reduces the size of a consequent light-induced ΔA(515), and vice versa. The total P-515 absorbance change which can be induced by ATP and light is constant; there is strict complementarity of ATP- and light-induced ΔA(515). (3) The suppression of the flash-induced ΔA(515) by a preceding ATP-induced ΔA(515) is accompanied by an about 15-fold acceleration of the overall dark-decay rate, which is not further accelerated by addition of 0.2 μM valinomycin. (4) Adopting the kinetic model of Schapendonk (Doctoral Thesis, Wageningen, 1980) it is concluded that the apparent acceleration of the overall dark-decay rate results from a specific elimination of the slowly decaying ‘Reaction II’ component. ATP hydrolysis is suggested to produce and to maintain the Reaction II-type electrochromic pigment shift in the dark. (5) The data offer an alternative explanation to the prevailing notion that increased proton conductance via the activated ATPase is the main cause for the apparent acceleration of the overall decay rate of the flash-induced ΔA(515) following preillumination or under ‘phosphorylating conditions’. (6) On the basis of the presented data it is argued that the total number of available sites which can produce a Reaction II-type electrochromic pigment shift is strictly limited. Consequently, the notion of a localized ATP- or light-induced field is favored. The properties of this localized field would suggest a close link to energy-dependent changes at the coupling factor complex and to the electrogenic reactions coupled with cyclic photophosphorylation.     

Iodination of chloroplasts. I. Properties of iodinated chloroplasts

Spinach chloroplasts exposed to iodide can be washed free of the bulk of the iodide. In the presence of lactoperoxidase and H₂O₂, iodide can be introduced into chloroplasts in high amounts and in non diffusible forms. The resultant particles, which have been named iodochloroplasts, extrude their iodide upon stimulation by light. The form and the amount of extruded iodide bears a definite relationship to the amount of incident light. A flash of marginally effective light is additive to the next such flash even after a lapse of 10 min of darkness. These and other properties of iodochloroplasts may make them of great use in the study of intermediate reactions of photosynthesis.     

Synergism of triggered luminescence by simultaneous treatment of pH transition and potassium addition in chloroplasts

KCl-induced luminescence in relation to slow delayed light emission (> 3 s) and pH shift-triggered luminescence was studied in preilluminated chloroplasts. An activation pathway for KCl-induced luminescence similar to that for acid-base-triggered luminescence but different from that for delayed light emission is suggested.When the chloroplasts were subjected to a small amount of pH transition together with a simultaneous addition of KCl, a synergistic enhancement of triggered luminescence was observed. The synergism was not observed when the pH transition was increased. The results are interpreted according to the protonation model for stimulated luminescence.     

The rapid component of electron paramagnetic resonance signal II: A candidate for the physiological donor to Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts

Rapid light-induced transients in EPR Signal IIf (F^?+) are observed in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated, Tris-washed chloroplasts until the state F P680 Q^? is reached. In the absence of exogenous redox mediators several flashes are required to saturate this photoinactive state. However, the Signal IIf transient is observed on only the first flash following DCMU addition if an efficient donor to Signal IIf, phenylenediamine or hydroquinone, is present. Complementary polarographic measurements show that under these conditions oxidized phenylenediamine is produced only on the first flash of a series. The DCMU inhibition of Signal IIf can be completely relieved by oxidative titration of a one-electron reductant with E′_08.0 = +480 mV. At high reduction potentials the decay time of Signal IIf is constant at about 300 ms, whereas in the absence of DCMU the decay time is longer and increases with increasing reduction potential.A model is proposed in which Q^?, the reduced Photosystem II primary acceptor, and D, a one-electron 480 mV donor endogenous to the chloroplast suspension, compete in the reduction of Signal IIf (F^?+). At high potentials D is oxidized in the dark, and the (Q^? + F^?+) back reaction regenerates the photoactive F P680 Q state. The electrochemical and kinetic evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that the Signal IIf species, F, is identical with Z, the physiological donor to P680.     

A rapid,light-induced transient in electron paramagnetic resonance signal II activated upon inhibition of photosynthetic oxygen evolution

A rapid, light-induced reversible component in Signal II is observed upon inhibition of oxygen evolution in broken spinach chloroplasts. The inhibitory treatments used include Tris washing, heat, treatment with chaotropic agents, and aging. This new Signal II component is in a 1 : 1 ratio with Signal I (P700). Its formation corresponds to a light-induced oxidation which occurs in less than 500 μs. The subsequent decay of the radical results from a reduction which occurs more rapidly as the reduction potential of the chloroplast suspension is decreased. The formation of this free radical component is complete following a single 10-μs flash, and it occurs with a quantum efficiency similar to that observed for Signal I formation. Red light is more effective than far-red light in the generation of this species, and, in preilluminated chloroplasts, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea blocks its formation. Inhibition studies show that the decline in oxygen evolution parallels the activation of this Signal II component.These results are interpreted in terms of a model in which two pathways, one involving water, the other involving the rapid Signal II component, compete for oxidizing equivalents generated by Photosystem II. In broken chloroplasts this Signal II pathway is deactivated and water is the principal electron donor. However, upon inhibition of oxygen evolution, the Signal II pathway is activated.