Localization of chromatin proteins within DNA grooves by methylation of chromatin with dimethyl sulphate

The use of the comparative modification with ³H-dimethyl sulphate (DMS) of free DNA and DNA in different complexes is proposed to evaluate the shielding of the minor and major grooves of the DNA double helix and to determine the presence of single-stranded DNA in the complexes.Glucosyl groups in DNA of T6 phage protect, as expected, the major groove, and actinomycin d in its complex with DNA shields the minor groove against methylation with DMS.The data obtained suggest that histones and protamine in reconstituted nucleohistone and nucleoprotamine are allocated within partly the major groove leaving the minor groove open, while polylysine does not seem to be buried within either of the grooves, and cations of cetyltrimethylammonium lie within the minor groove of DNA.     

Preferential protection of the minor groove of non-operator DNA by lac repressor against methylation by dimethyl sulphate.

The binding of lactose repressor to non-operator DNA was studied by the modification of several DNA's, including glycosylated DNA, with dimethyl sulphate, which affects the minor and major grooves of DNA and single stranded DNA regions. The non-specific binding of the repressor to DNA protected the minor groove but apparently not the major groove of the DNA double helix against methylation and did not increase the content of single stranded DNA regions. This suggests that the repressor on binding to non-operator DNA makes contacts mainly in the minor groove of DNA and does not uncoil the DNA double helix. This is different from the interaction of the repressor with lactose operator DNA which occurs, as shown by Gilbert et al. (1), along both the major and the minor groove.     

A Model for Parallel Triple Helix Formation by Ree A: Single-Strand Association with a Homologous Duple via the Minor Groove

Abstract

The nucleoproteic filaments of RecA polymerized on single stranded DNA are able to integrate double stranded DNA in a coaxial arrangement (with DNA stretched by a factor 1.5), to recognize homologous sequences in the duplex and to perform strand exchange between the single stranded and double stranded molecules. While experimental results favor the hypothesis of an invasion of the minor groove of the duplex by the single strand, parallel minor groove triple helices have never been isolated or even modeled, the minor groove offering little space for a third strand to interact. Based on an internal coordinate modeling study, we show here that such a structure is perfectly conceivable when the two interacting oligomers are stretched by a factor 1.5, in order to open the minor groove of the duplex. The model helix presents characteristics that coincide with known experimental data on unwinding, base pair inclination and inter-proton distances. Moreover, we show that extension and unwinding stabilize the triple helix. New patterns of triplet interaction via the minor groove are presented.     

A model for parallel triple helix formation by RecA: single-single association with a homologous duplex via the minor groove

The nucleoproteic filaments of RecA polymerized on single stranded DNA are able to integrate double stranded DNA in a coaxial arrangement (with DNA stretched by a factor 1.5), to recognize homologous sequences in the duplex and to perform strand exchange between the single stranded and double stranded molecules. While experimental results favor the hypothesis of an invasion of the minor groove of the duplex by the single strand, parallel minor groove triple helices have never been isolated or even modeled, the minor groove offering little space for a third strand to interact. Based on an internal coordinate modeling study, we show here that such a structure is perfectly conceivable when the two interacting oligomers are stretched by a factor 1.5, in order to open the minor groove of the duplex. The model helix presents characteristics that coincide with known experimental data on unwinding, base pair inclination and inter-proton distances. Moreover, we show that extension and unwinding stabilize the triple helix. New patterns of triplet interaction via the minor groove are presented.     

Crystal structure of the chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1 (Chd1) DNA-binding domain in complex with DNA

Chromatin remodelers are ATP-dependent machines that dynamically alter the chromatin packaging of eukaryotic genomes by assembling, sliding, and displacing nucleosomes. The Chd1 chromatin remodeler possesses a C-terminal DNA-binding domain that is required for efficient nucleosome sliding and believed to be essential for sensing the length of DNA flanking the nucleosome core. The structure of the Chd1 DNA-binding domain was recently shown to consist of a SANT and SLIDE domain, analogous to the DNA-binding domain of the ISWI family, yet the details of how Chd1 recognized DNA were not known. Here we present the crystal structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chd1 DNA-binding domain in complex with a DNA duplex. The bound DNA duplex is straight, consistent with the preference exhibited by the Chd1 DNA-binding domain for extranucleosomal DNA. Comparison of this structure with the recently solved ISW1a DNA-binding domain bound to DNA reveals that DNA lays across each protein at a distinct angle, yet contacts similar surfaces on the SANT and SLIDE domains. In contrast to the minor groove binding seen for Isw1 and predicted for Chd1, the SLIDE domain of the Chd1 DNA-binding domain contacts the DNA major groove. The majority of direct contacts with the phosphate backbone occur only on one DNA strand, suggesting that Chd1 may not strongly discriminate between major and minor grooves.     

Understanding the sequence-dependence of DNA groove dimensions: implications for DNA interactions

Background

The B-DNA major and minor groove dimensions are crucial for DNA-protein interactions. It has long been thought that the groove dimensions depend on the DNA sequence, however this relationship has remained elusive. Here, our aim is to elucidate how the DNA sequence intrinsically shapes the grooves.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The present study is based on the analysis of datasets of free and protein-bound DNA crystal structures, and from a compilation of NMR ³¹P chemical shifts measured on free DNA in solution on a broad range of representative sequences. The ³¹P chemical shifts can be interpreted in terms of the BI↔BII backbone conformations and dynamics. The grooves width and depth of free and protein-bound DNA are found to be clearly related to the BI/BII backbone conformational states. The DNA propensity to undergo BI↔BII backbone transitions is highly sequence-dependent and can be quantified at the dinucleotide level. This dual relationship, between DNA sequence and backbone behavior on one hand, and backbone behavior and groove dimensions on the other hand, allows to decipher the link between DNA sequence and groove dimensions. It also firmly establishes that proteins take advantage of the intrinsic DNA groove properties.

Conclusions/Significance

The study provides a general framework explaining how the DNA sequence shapes the groove dimensions in free and protein-bound DNA, with far-reaching implications for DNA-protein indirect readout in both specific and non specific interactions.     

Sequence-Dependent Bending of DNA and Phasing of Nucleosomes

Abstract

Conformational analysis has revealed anisotropic flexibility of the B-DNA double helix: it bends most easily into the grooves, being the most rigid when bent in a perpendicular direction. This result implies that DNA in a nucleosome is curved by means of relatively sharp bends (“mini-kinks”) which are directed into the major and minor grooves alternatively and separated by 5–6 base pairs. The “mini-kink” model proved to be in keeping with the x-ray structure of the B-DNA dodecamer resolved later, which exhibits two “annealed kinks”, also directed into the grooves.

The anisotropy of B DNA is sequence-dependent: the pyrimidine-purine dimers (YR) favor bending into the minor groove, and the purine-pyrimidine dinucleotides (RY), into the minor one. The RR and YY dimers appear to be the most rigid dinucleotides. Thus, a DNA fragment consisting of the interchanging oligopurine and oligopyrmidine blocks 5–6 base pairs long should manifest a spectacular curvature in solution.

Similarly, a nucleotide sequence containing the RY and YR dimers separated by a half-pitch of the double helix is the most suitable for wrapping around the nucleosomal core. Analysis of the numerous examples demonstrating the specific alignment of nucleosomes on DNA confirms this concept. So, the sequence-dependent “mechanical” properties of the double helix influence the spatial arrangement of DNA in chromatin.     

Alteration of the groove width of DNA induced by the multimodal hydrogen bonding of denaturants with DNA bases in its grooves affects their stability

BackgroundDenaturants, namely, urea and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) affect the stability as well as structure of DNA. Critical assessment of the role of hydrogen bonding of these denaturants with the different regions of DNA is essential in terms of its stability and structural aspect. However, the understanding of the mechanistic aspects of structural change of DNA induced by the denaturants is not yet well understood.MethodsIn this study, various spectroscopic along with molecular dynamics (MD) simulation techniques were employed to understand the role of hydrogen bonding of these denaturants with DNA bases in their stability and structural change.Results and conclusionIt has been found that both, GdmCl and urea intrude into groove region of DNA by striping surrounding water. The hydrogen bonding pattern of Gdm⁺ and urea with DNA bases in its groove region is multimodal and distinctly different from each other. The interaction of GdmCl with DNA is stabilized by electrostatic interaction whereas electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions both contribute for urea. Gdm⁺ forms direct hydrogen bond with the bases in the minor groove of DNA whereas direct and water assisted hydrogen bond takes place with urea. The hydrogen bond formed between Gdm⁺ with bases in the groove region of DNA is stronger than urea due to strong electrostatic interaction along with less self-aggregation of Gdm⁺ than urea. The distinct hydrogen bonding capability of Gdm⁺ and urea with DNA bases in its groove region affects its width differently. The interaction of Gdm⁺ decreases the width of the minor and major groove which probably increases the strength of hydrogen bond between the Watson-Crick base pairs of DNA leading to its stability. In contrast, the interaction of urea does not affect much to the width of the grooves except the marginal increase in the minor groove width which probably decreases the strength of hydrogen bond between Watson Crick base pairs leading to the destabilization of DNA.General significanceOur study clearly depicts the role of hydrogen bonding between DNA bases and denaturants in their stability and structural change which can be used further for designing of the guanidinium based drug molecules.     

Structural insights into the interaction of the crenarchaeal chromatin protein Cren7 with DNA

Cren7, a newly found chromatin protein, is highly conserved in the Crenarchaeota. The protein shows higher affinity for double‐stranded DNA than for single‐stranded DNA, constrains negative DNA supercoils in vitro and is associated with genomic DNA in vivo. Here we report the crystal structures of the Cren7 protein from Sulfolobus solfataricus in complex with two DNA sequences. Cren7 binds in the minor groove of DNA and causes a single‐step sharp kink in DNA (～53°) through the intercalation of the hydrophobic side chain of Leu28. Loop β3‐β4 of Cren7 undergoes a significant conformational change upon binding of the protein to DNA, suggesting its critical role in the stabilization of the protein–DNA complex. The roles of DNA‐contacting amino acid residues in stabilizing the Cren7–DNA interaction were examined by mutational analysis. Structural comparison of Cren7‐DNA complexes with Sac7d‐DNA complexes reveals significant differences between the two proteins in DNA binding surface, suggesting that Cren7 and Sul7d serve distinct functions in chromosomal organization.     

Similarities and differences in interaction of K+ and Na+ with condensed ordered DNA. A molecular dynamics computer simulation study

Four 20 ns molecular dynamics simulations have been performed with two counterions, K⁺ or Na⁺, at two water contents, 15 or 20 H₂O per nucleotide. A hexagonal simulation cell comprised of three identical DNA decamers [d(5′-ATGCAGTCAG) × d(5′-TGACTGCATC)] with periodic boundary condition along the DNA helix was used. The simulation setup mimics the DNA state in oriented DNA fibers or in crystals of DNA oligomers. Variation of counterion nature and water content do not alter averaged DNA structure. K⁺ and Na⁺ binding to DNA are different. K⁺ binds to the electronegative sites of DNA bases in the major and the minor grooves, while Na⁺ interacts preferentially with the phosphate groups. Increase of water causes a shift of both K⁺ and Na⁺ from the first hydration shell of O1P/O2P and of the DNA bases in the minor groove with lesser influence for the cation binding to the bases in the major groove. Mobility of both water and cations in the K–DNA systems is faster than in the Na–DNA systems: Na⁺ organizes and immobilizes water structure around itself and near DNA while for K⁺ water is less organized and more dynamic.     

Using Soft X-Rays for a Detailed Picture of Divalent Metal Binding in the Nucleosome

Divalent metals associate with DNA in a site-selective manner, which can influence nucleosome positioning, mobility, compaction, and recognition by nuclear factors. We previously characterized divalent metal binding in the nucleosome core using hard (short-wavelength) X-rays allowing high-resolution crystallographic determination of the strongest affinity sites, which revealed that Mn²⁺ associates with the DNA major groove in a sequence- and conformation-dependent manner. In this study, we obtained diffraction data with soft X-rays at the Mn²⁺ absorption edge for a core particle crystal in the presence of 10 mM MnSO₄, mimicking prevailing Mg²⁺ concentration in the nucleus. This provides an exceptional view of counterion binding in the nucleosome through identification of 45 divalent metal binding sites.In addition to that at the well-characterized major interparticle interface, only one other histone-divalent metal binding site is found, which corresponds to a symmetry-related counterpart on the ‘free’ H2B α1 helix C-terminus. This emphasizes the importance of the α-helix dipole in ion binding and suggests that the H2B motif may serve as a nucleation site in nucleosome compaction. The 43 sites associated with the DNA are characterized by (1) high-affinity direct coordination at the most electrostatically favorable major groove locations, (2) metal hydrate binding to the major groove, (3) direct coordination to phosphate groups at sites of high charge density, (4) metal hydrate binding in the minor groove, or (5) metal hydrate-divalent anion pairing. Metal hydrates are found within the minor groove only at locations displaying a narrow range of high-intermediate width and to which histone N-terminal tails are not associated or proximal. This indicates that divalent metals and histone tails can both collaborate and compete in minor groove association, which sheds light on nucleosome solubility and chromatin compaction behavior.     

A study of unwinding of DNA and shielding of the DNA grooves by RNA polymerase by using methylation with dimethylsulphate.

The dimethylsulphate method has been used to study the complexes of RNA polymerase (Escherichia coli) with DNA of T7 phage, poly[d(A--T)] and fragments of calf thymus DNA protected against DNase digestion by RNA polymerase. The binding of RNA polymerase to DNA significantly increases the formation of 1-methyl-adenine produced by methylation of the single-stranded DNA region, diminishes by about 10% the formation of 3-methyl-adenine by methylation within the minor groove and does not affect the formation of 7-methyl-guanine by methylation within the major DNA groove. The presence of nascent RNA decreases the formation of 1-methyl-adenine in DNA of the complex by about 30%. The initiation of RNA synthesis or RNA synthesis itself does not influence the methylation of the major groove but shielding of the minor groove increases by about twice as much. These results suggest that RNA polymerase, upon binding, breaks Watson-Crick base-pairing in a DNA region of about 15-base-pairs long, that nascent RNA forms a duplex with DNA of about 10-base-pairs long; and that the enzyme weakly interacts with DNA along its grooves and preferentially makes contacts with the minor groove.     

An electrostatic model for the dielectric effects,the adsorption of multivalent ions,and the bending of B-DNA

We have studied electrostatic properties of DNA with a discrete charge model consisting of a cylindrical dielectric core with a radius of 8 Å and a dielectric constant D_i = 4, surrounded by two helical strings of phosphate point charges at 10 Å from the axis, immersed in an aqueous medium with dielectric constant D_w = 78.54. Eliminating the dielectric core makes potentials in the phosphate surface less negative by about 0.5 kT/e. Salt effects are evaluated for the model without a dielectric core, using the shielded Coulomb potential. Smearing the phosphate charges increases their potential by about 2.5 kT/e, due mostly to the self-potential of the smeared charge. Potentials in the center of the minor and major grooves vary less than 0.02 kT/e along their helical path. The potential in the center of the minor groove is from 1.0 to 1.7 kT/e, more negative than in the center of the major groove, depending on dielectric core and salt concentration. So multivalent cations and also larger cationic ligands, such as some antibiotics, are likely to adsorb in the minor groove, in agreement with earlier computations by A. and B. Pullman. Dielectric effects on the surface potential and the local potential variations are found to be relatively small. Bending of DNA is studied by placing a multivalent cation, M^Z+, in the center of the minor or major groove, curving DNA around it for a certain length, and calculating the free energy difference between the bent and the straight configuration. Boltzmann averaged bending angles, 〈β〉, are found to be maximal in 0.03M monovalent salt, for a length of about 50 or 25 Å of curved DNA when an M^Z+ ion is adsorbed in the minor or the major groove, respectively. When the dielectric constant of water is used throughout the calculation, we find maximal bends of 〈β〉 = 11° for M²⁺ and 〈β〉 = 16° for M³⁺ in the minor groove, 〈β〉 = 13° for M³⁺ in the major groove. The absence of bends in DNA adsorbed to mica in the presence of Mg salts supports the role of Mg²⁺ in “ion bridging” between DNA and mica. The treatment of the effective dielectric constant between two points outside a dielectric cylinder in water is appended. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 46: 503–516, 1998     

What drives proteins into the major or minor grooves of DNA?

The energetic profiles of a significant number of protein-DNA systems at 20 °C reveal that, despite comparable Gibbs free energies, association with the major groove is primarily an enthalpy-driven process, whereas binding to the minor groove is characterized by an unfavorable enthalpy that is compensated by favorable entropic contributions. These distinct energetic signatures for major versus minor groove binding are irrespective of the magnitude of DNA bending and/or the extent of binding-induced protein refolding. The primary determinants of their different energetic profiles appear to be the distinct hydration properties of the major and minor grooves; namely, that the water in the A+T-rich minor groove is in a highly ordered state and its removal results in a substantial positive contribution to the binding entropy. Since the entropic forces driving protein binding into the minor groove are a consequence of displacing water ordered by the regular arrangement of polar contacts, they cannot be regarded as hydrophobic.     

Mode of reversible binding of neocarzinostatin chromophore to DNA: evidence for binding via the minor groove

Two general approaches have been taken to understand the mechanism of the reversible binding of the nonprotein chromophore of neocarzinostatin to DNA: (1) measurement of the relative affinity of the chromophore for various DNAs that have one or both grooves blocked by bulky groups and (2) studies on the influence of adenine-thymine residue-specific, minor groove binding agents such as the antibiotics netropsin and distamycin on the chromophore-DNA interaction. Experiments using synthetic DNAs containing halogen group (Br, I) substituents in the major groove or natural DNAs with glucosyl moieties projecting into the major groove show that obstruction of the major groove does not decrease the binding stoichiometry or the binding constant for the DNA-chromophore interaction. Chemical methylation of bases in both grooves of calf thymus DNA, resulting in 13% methylation of N-7 of guanine in the major groove and 7% methylation of N-3 of adenine in the minor groove, decreases the binding affinity and increases the size of the binding site for neocarzinostatin chromophore. Similar results were obtained whether binding parameters were determined directly by spectroscopic measurements or indirectly by measuring the ability of the DNA to protect the chromophore against degradation. On the other hand, netropsin and distamycin compete with neocarzinostatin chromophore for binding to the minor groove of DNA, as shown by their decrease in the ability of poly(dA-dT) to protect the chromophore against degradation and their reduction in chromophore-induced DNA damage as measured by thymine release.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Accessibility of the minor groove of DNA in chromatin to the binding of antibiotics netropsin and distamycin A

The interaction of the antibiotics distamycin A, distamycin analogue and netropsin with chromatin of calf thymus has been studied by circular dichroism measurements and by gel filtration. The minor groove of DNA in chromatin is accessible by 83–89% to the binding of these antibiotics as compared with that of free DNA. The present results combined with our data on the methylation of chromatin with dimethylsulphate [3] strongly suggest that the minor groove of DNA in chromatin is not occupied by chromatin proteins.Abbreviations DM distamycin A - DM₂ analogue of distamycin - Nt netropsin - CD spectra circular dichroism spectra     

Discrimination against major groove adducts by Y-family polymerases of the DinB subfamily

Y-family DNA polymerases bypass DNA adducts in a process known as translesion synthesis (TLS). Y-family polymerases make contacts with the minor groove side of the DNA substrate at the nascent base pair. The Y-family polymerases also contact the DNA major groove via the unique little finger domain, but they generally lack contacts with the major groove at the nascent base pair. Escherichia coli DinB efficiently and accurately copies certain minor groove guanosine adducts. In contrast, we previously showed that the presence in the DNA template of the major groove-modified base 1,3-diaza-2-oxophenothiazine (tC) inhibits the activity of E. coli DinB. Even when the DNA primer is extended up to three nucleotides beyond the site of the tC analog, DinB activity is strongly inhibited. These findings prompted us to investigate discrimination against other major groove modifications by DinB and its orthologs. We chose a set of pyrimidines and purines with modifications in the major groove and determined the activity of DinB and several orthologs with these substrates. DinB, human pol kappa, and Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4 show differing specificities for the major groove adducts pyrrolo-dC, dP, N⁶-furfuryl-dA, and etheno-dA. In general, DinB was least efficient for bypass of all of these major groove adducts, whereas Dpo4 was most efficient. DinB activity was essentially completely inhibited by the presence of etheno-dA, while pol kappa activity was strongly inhibited. All three of these DNA polymerases were able to bypass N⁶-furfuryl-dA with modest efficiency, with DinB being the least efficient. We also determined that the R35A variant of DinB enhances bypass of N⁶-furfuryl-dA but not etheno-dA. In sum, we find that whereas DinB is specific for bypass of minor groove adducts, it is specifically inhibited by major groove DNA modifications.     

A unified model for the origin of DNA sequence-directed curvature

The fine structure of the DNA double helix and a number of its physical properties depend upon nucleotide sequence. This includes minor groove width, the propensity to undergo the B-form to A-form transition, sequence-directed curvature, and cation localization. Despite the multitude of studies conducted on DNA, it is still difficult to appreciate how these fundamental properties are linked to each other at the level of nucleotide sequence. We demonstrate that several sequence-dependent properties of DNA can be attributed, at least in part, to the sequence-specific localization of cations in the major and minor grooves. We also show that effects of cation localization on DNA structure are easier to understand if we divide all DNA sequences into three principal groups: A-tracts, G-tracts, and generic DNA. The A-tract group of sequences has a peculiar helical structure (i.e., B*-form) with an unusually narrow minor groove and high base-pair propeller twist. Both experimental and theoretical studies have provided evidence that the B*-form helical structure of A-tracts requires cations to be localized in the minor groove. G-tracts, on the other hand, have a propensity to undergo the B-form to A-form transition with increasing ionic strength. This property of G-tracts is directly connected to the observation that cations are preferentially localized in the major groove of G-tract sequences. Generic DNA, which represents the vast majority of DNA sequences, has a more balanced occupation of the major and minor grooves by cations than A-tracts or G-tracts and is thereby stabilized in the canonical B-form helix. Thus, DNA secondary structure can be viewed as a tug of war between the major and minor grooves for cations, with A-tracts and G-tracts each having one groove that dominates the other for cation localization. Finally, the sequence-directed curvature caused by A-tracts and G-tracts can, in both cases, be explained by the cation-dependent mismatch of A-tract and G-tract helical structures with the canonical B-form helix of generic DNA (i.e., a cation-dependent junction model).     

The N-terminal Tails of Histones H2A and H2B Adopt Two Distinct Conformations in the Nucleosome with Contact and Reduced Contact to DNA

The nucleosome comprises two histone dimers of H2A-H2B and one histone tetramer of (H3-H4)₂, wrapped around by ~145 bp of DNA. Detailed core structures of nucleosomes have been established by X-ray and cryo-EM, however, histone tails have not been visualized. Here, we have examined the dynamic structures of the H2A and H2B tails in 145-bp and 193-bp nucleosomes using NMR, and have compared them with those of the H2A and H2B tail peptides unbound and bound to DNA. Whereas the H2A C-tail adopts a single but different conformation in both nucleosomes, the N-tails of H2A and H2B adopt two distinct conformations in each nucleosome. To clarify these conformations, we conducted molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, which suggest that the H2A N-tail can locate stably in either the major or minor grooves of nucleosomal DNA. While the H2B N-tail, which sticks out between two DNA gyres in the nucleosome, was considered to adopt two different orientations, one toward the entry/exit side and one on the opposite side. Then, the H2A N-tail minor groove conformation was obtained in the H2B opposite side and the H2B N-tail interacts with DNA similarly in both sides, though more varied conformations are obtained in the entry/exit side. Collectively, the NMR findings and MD simulations suggest that the minor groove conformer of the H2A N-tail is likely to contact DNA more strongly than the major groove conformer, and the H2A N-tail reduces contact with DNA in the major groove when the H2B N-tail is located in the entry/exit side.