Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V subunit exchange: a post-SOS mechanism to curtail error-prone DNA synthesis

DNA polymerase V consisting of a heterotrimer composed of one molecule of UmuC and two molecules of UmuD' (UmuD'2C) is responsible for SOS damage-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Here we show that although the UmuD'2C complex remains intact through multiple chromatographic steps, excess UmuD, the precursor to UmuD', displaces UmuD' from UmuD'2C by forming a UmuDD' heterodimer, while UmuC concomitantly aggregates as an insoluble precipitate. Although soluble UmuD'2C is readily detected when the two genes are co-transcribed and translated in vitro, soluble UmuD2C or UmuDD'C are not detected. The subunit exchange between UmuD'2C and UmuD offers a biological means to inactivate error-prone polymerase V following translesion synthesis, thus preventing mutations from occurring on undamaged DNA.     

Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins.

One of the components of the RecA-LexA-controlled SOS response in Escherichia coli cells is an inducible error-prone DNA replication pathway that results in a substantial increase in the mutation rate. It is believed that error-prone DNA synthesis is performed by a multiprotein complex that is formed by UmuC, UmuD', RecA, and probably DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. It is postulated that the formation of such a complex requires specific interactions between these proteins. We have analyzed the specific protein-protein interactions between UmuC, UmuD, and UmuD' fusion proteins, using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid system. In agreement with previous in vitro data, we have shown that UmuD and UmuD' are able to form both homodimers (UmuD-UmuD and UmuD'-UmuD') and a heterodimer (UmuD-UmuD'). Our data show that UmuC fusion protein is capable of interacting exclusively with UmuD' and not with UmuD. Thus, posttranslational processing of UmuD into UmuD' is a critical step in SOS mutagenesis, enabling only the latter protein to interact with UmuC. Our data seem to indicate that the integrity of the entire UmuC sequence is essential for UmuC-UmuD' heterotypic interaction. Finally, in our studies, we used three different UmuC mutant proteins: UmuC25, UmuC36, and UmuC104. We have found that UmuC25 and UmuC36 are not capable of associating with UmuD'. In contrast, UmuC104 protein interacts with UmuD' protein with an efficiency identical to that of the wild-type protein. We postulate that UmuC104 protein might be defective in interaction with another, unknown protein essential for the SOS mutagenesis pathway.     

Converting a DNA damage checkpoint effector (UmuD2C) into a lesion bypass polymerase (UmuD'2C)

During the SOS response of Escherichia coli to DNA damage, the umuDC operon is induced, producing the trimeric protein complexes UmuD2C, a DNA damage checkpoint effector, and UmuD'2C (DNA polymerase V), which carries out translesion synthesis, the basis of 'SOS mutagenesis'. UmuD'2, the homodimeric component of DNA pol V, is produced from UmuD by RecA-facilitated self-cleavage, which removes the 24 N-terminal residues of UmuD. We report the solution structure of UmuD'2 (PDB ID 1I4V) and interactions within UmuD'-UmuD, a heterodimer inactive in translesion synthesis. The overall shape of UmuD'2 in solution differs substantially from the previously reported crystal structure, even though the topologies of the two structures are quite similar. Most significantly, the active site residues S60 and K97 do not point directly at one another in solution as they do in the crystal, suggesting that self-cleavage of UmuD might require RecA to assemble the active site. Structural differences between UmuD'2 and UmuD'- UmuD suggest that UmuD'2C and UmuD2C might achieve their different biological activities through distinct interactions with RecA and DNA pol III.     

RecA protein of Escherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity.

The DNA damage-inducible SOS response of Escherichia coli includes an error-prone translesion DNA replication activity responsible for SOS mutagenesis. In certain recA mutant strains, in which the SOS response is expressed constitutively, SOS mutagenesis is manifested as a mutator activity. Like UV mutagenesis, SOS mutator activity requires the products of the umuDC operon and depends on RecA protein for at least two essential activities: facilitating cleavage of LexA repressor to derepress SOS genes and processing UmuD protein to produce a fragment (UmuD') that is active in mutagenesis. To determine whether RecA has an additional role in SOS mutator activity, spontaneous mutability (tryptophan dependence to independence) was measured in a family of nine lexA-defective strains, each having a different recA allele, transformed or not with a plasmid that overproduces either UmuD' alone or both UmuD' and UmuC. The magnitude of SOS mutator activity in these strains, which require neither of the two known roles of RecA protein, was strongly dependent on the particular recA allele that was present. We conclude that UmuD'C does not determine the mutation rate independently of RecA and that RecA has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity.     

The dimeric SOS mutagenesis protein UmuD is active as a monomer

The homodimeric umuD gene products play key roles in regulating the cellular response to DNA damage in Escherichia coli. UmuD(2) is composed of 139-amino acid subunits and is up-regulated as part of the SOS response. Subsequently, damage-induced RecA·ssDNA nucleoprotein filaments mediate the slow self-cleavage of the N-terminal 24-amino acid arms yielding UmuD'(2). UmuD(2) and UmuD'(2) make a number of distinct protein-protein contacts that both prevent and facilitate mutagenic translesion synthesis. Wild-type UmuD(2) and UmuD'(2) form exceptionally tight dimers in solution; however, we show that the single amino acid change N41D generates stable, active UmuD and UmuD' monomers that functionally mimic the dimeric wild-type proteins. The UmuD N41D monomer is proficient for cleavage and interacts physically with DNA polymerase IV (DinB) and the β clamp. Furthermore, the N41D variants facilitate UV-induced mutagenesis and promote overall cell viability. Taken together, these observations show that a monomeric form of UmuD retains substantial function in vivo and in vitro.     

umuDC-dnaQ Interaction and its implications for cell cycle regulation and SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli SOS-regulated umuDC gene products participate in a DNA damage checkpoint control and in translesion DNA synthesis. Specific interactions involving the UmuD and UmuD' proteins, both encoded by the umuD gene, and components of the replicative DNA polymerase, Pol III, appear to be important for regulating these two biological activities of the umuDC gene products. Here we show that overproduction of the epsilon proofreading subunit of Pol III suppresses the cold sensitivity normally associated with overexpression of the umuDC gene products. Our results suggest that this suppression is attributable to specific interactions between UmuD or UmuD' and the C-terminal domain of epsilon.     

A model for the structure of the Escherichia coli SOS-regulated UmuD2 protein

The ubiquitous Y-family of DNA polymerases, exemplified by the Escherichia coli UmuC protein (the catalytic subunit of DNA Pol V), possess the remarkable ability to replicate imperfect DNA templates that cannot be replicated by other types of DNA polymerases. Since this ability comes at the cost of a reduced fidelity, it is important that organisms manage these unique polymerases to coordinate their actions with those of the replication machinery. In E. coli, it is becoming evident that a sophisticated series of protein-protein interactions involving the two forms of the umuD gene product, UmuD and UmuD' and components of the replicative DNA polymerase serve to manage the actions of the umuC-encoded DNA polymerase. The purpose of this study was to better understand how structural differences between UmuD2 and UmuD2' help to determine which biological role the umuDC gene products will play; the UmuD2C complex functions as a DNA damage checkpoint effector, while the UmuD2'C complex participates in translesion DNA synthesis, which serves as the mechanistic basis for most chemical and UV light mutagenesis. Based on the results of a combination of disulfide cross-linking experiments, measurements of solvent accessibility and electron paramagnetic spin resonance (EPR) studies, we have developed a refined model for the structure of the UmuD2 homodimer. In the model that we are proposing, the N-terminal arms of UmuD (residues 1-39) form an extended interface in the UmuD2 homodimer by folding down over the globular domains of their intradimer partners. As a result, significant portions of the surface of each globular domain are buried in the UmuD2 homodimer. Based on the structure of the UmuD2' homodimer, both in the crystal and in solution, these same surfaces are exposed. Implications of these structural differences between the UmuD2 and the UmuD2' homodimers with respect to their roles in managing the actions of the umuC-encoded DNA polymerase are discussed.     

Identification of specific amino acid residues in the E. coli beta processivity clamp involved in interactions with DNA polymerase III, UmuD and UmuD'

Variants of a pentapeptide sequence (QL[S/F]LF), referred to as the eubacterial clamp-binding motif, appear to be required for certain proteins to bind specifically to the Escherichia coli beta sliding clamp, apparently by making contact with a hydrophobic pocket located at the base of the C-terminal tail of each beta protomer. Although both UmuC (DNA pol V) and the alpha catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase III (pol III) each bear a reasonable match to this motif, which appears to be required for their respective interactions with the clamp, neither UmuD not UmuD' do. As part of an ongoing effort to understand how interactions involving the different E. coli umuDC gene products and components of DNA polymerase III help to coordinate DNA replication with a DNA damage checkpoint control and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) following DNA damage, we characterized the surfaces on beta important for its interactions with the two forms of the umuD gene product. We also characterized the surface of beta important for its interaction with the alpha catalytic subunit of pol III. Our results indicate that although UmuD, UmuD' and alpha share some common contacts with beta, each also makes unique contacts with the clamp. These findings suggest that differential interactions of UmuD and UmuD' with beta impose a DNA damage-responsive conditionality on how beta interacts with the translesion DNA polymerase UmuC. This is formally analogous to how post-translational modification of the eukaryotic PCNA clamp influences mutagenesis. We discuss the implications of our findings in terms of how E. coli might coordinate the actions of the umuDC gene products with those of pol III, as well as for how organisms in general might manage the actions of their multiple DNA polymerases.     

Selective disruption of the DNA polymerase III α-β complex by the umuD gene products

DNA polymerase III (DNA pol III) efficiently replicates the Escherichia coli genome, but it cannot bypass DNA damage. Instead, translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases are employed to replicate past damaged DNA; however, the exchange of replicative for TLS polymerases is not understood. The umuD gene products, which are up-regulated during the SOS response, were previously shown to bind to the α, β and ε subunits of DNA pol III. Full-length UmuD inhibits DNA replication and prevents mutagenic TLS, while the cleaved form UmuD' facilitates mutagenesis. We show that α possesses two UmuD binding sites: at the N-terminus (residues 1-280) and the C-terminus (residues 956-975). The C-terminal site favors UmuD over UmuD'. We also find that UmuD, but not UmuD', disrupts the α-β complex. We propose that the interaction between α and UmuD contributes to the transition between replicative and TLS polymerases by removing α from the β clamp.     

A non-cleavable UmuD variant that acts as a UmuD' mimic

UmuD(2) cleaves and removes its N-terminal 24 amino acids to form UmuD'(2), which activates UmuC for its role in UV-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Cells with a non-cleavable UmuD exhibit essentially no UV-induced mutagenesis and are hypersensitive to killing by UV light. UmuD binds to the beta processivity clamp ("beta") of the replicative DNA polymerase, pol III. A possible beta-binding motif has been predicted in the same region of UmuD shown to be important for its interaction with beta. We performed alanine-scanning mutagenesis of this motif ((14)TFPLF(18)) in UmuD and found that it has a moderate influence on UV-induced mutagenesis but is required for the cold-sensitive phenotype caused by elevated levels of wild-type UmuD and UmuC. Surprisingly, the wild-type and the beta-binding motif variant bind to beta with similar K(d) values as determined by changes in tryptophan fluorescence. However, these data also imply that the single tryptophan in beta is in strikingly different environments in the presence of the wild-type versus the variant UmuD proteins, suggesting a distinct change in some aspect of the interaction with little change in its strength. Despite the fact that this novel UmuD variant is non-cleavable, we find that cells harboring it display phenotypes more consistent with the cleaved form UmuD', such as resistance to killing by UV light and failure to exhibit the cold-sensitive phenotype. Cross-linking and chemical modification experiments indicate that the N-terminal arms of the UmuD variant are less likely to be bound to the globular domain than those of the wild-type, which may be the mechanism by which this UmuD variant acts as a UmuD' mimic.     

Inhibition of Escherichia coli RecA coprotease activities by DinI.

In Escherichia coli, the SOS response is induced upon DNA damage and results in the enhanced expression of a set of genes involved in DNA repair and other functions. The initial step, self-cleavage of the LexA repressor, is promoted by the RecA protein which is activated upon binding to single-stranded DNA. In this work, induction of the SOS response by the addition of mitomycin C was found to be prevented by overexpression of the dinI gene. dinI is an SOS gene which maps at 24.6 min of the E.coli chromosome and encodes a small protein of 81 amino acids. Immunoblotting analysis with anti-LexA antibodies revealed that LexA did not undergo cleavage in dinI-overexpressed cells after UV irradiation. In addition, the RecA-dependent conversion of UmuD to UmuD' (the active form for mutagenesis) was also inhibited in dinI-overexpressed cells. Conversely, a dinI-deficient mutant showed a slightly faster and more extensive processing of UmuD and hence higher mutability than the wild-type. Finally, we demonstrated, by using an in vitro reaction with purified proteins, that DinI directly inhibits the ability of RecA to mediate self-cleavage of UmuD.     

umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is a manifestation of functions of the UmuD(2)C complex involved in a DNA damage checkpoint control

The umuDC genes are part of the Escherichia coli SOS response, and their expression is induced as a consequence of DNA damage. After induction, they help to promote cell survival via two temporally separate pathways. First, UmuD and UmuC together participate in a cell cycle checkpoint control; second, UmuD'(2)C enables translesion DNA replication over any remaining unrepaired or irreparable lesions in the DNA. Furthermore, elevated expression of the umuDC gene products leads to a cold-sensitive growth phenotype that correlates with a rapid inhibition of DNA synthesis. Here, using two mutant umuC alleles, one that encodes a UmuC derivative that lacks a detectable DNA polymerase activity (umuC104; D101N) and another that encodes a derivative that is unable to confer cold sensitivity but is proficient for SOS mutagenesis (umuC125; A39V), we show that umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity can be genetically separated from the role of UmuD'(2)C in SOS mutagenesis. Our genetic and biochemical characterizations of UmuC derivatives bearing nested deletions of C-terminal sequences indicate that umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is not due solely to the single-stranded DNA binding activity of UmuC. Taken together, our analyses suggest that umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is conferred by an activity of the UmuD(2)C complex and not by the separate actions of the UmuD and UmuC proteins. Finally, we present evidence for structural differences between UmuD and UmuD' in solution, consistent with the notion that these differences are important for the temporal regulation of the two separate physiological roles of the umuDC gene products.     

Mutagenic DNA repair in enterobacteria.

Sixteen species of enterobacteria have been screened for mutagenic DNA repair activity. In Escherichia coli, mutagenic DNA repair is encoded by the umuDC operon. Synthesis of UmuD and UmuC proteins is induced as part of the SOS response to DNA damage, and after induction, the UmuD protein undergoes an autocatalytic cleavage to produce the carboxy-terminal UmuD' fragment needed for induced mutagenesis. The presence of a similar system in other species was examined by using a combined approach of inducible-mutagenesis assays, cross-reactivity to E. coli UmuD and UmuD' antibodies to test for induction and cleavage of UmuD-like proteins, and hybridization with E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium umu DNA probes to map umu-like genes. The results indicate a more widespread distribution of mutagenic DNA repair in other species than was previously thought. They also show that umu loci can be more complex in other species than in E. coli. Differences in UV-induced mutability of more than 200-fold were seen between different species of enteric bacteria and even between multiple natural isolates of E. coli, and yet some of the species which display a poorly mutable phenotype still have umu-like genes and proteins. It is suggested that umDC genes can be curtailed in their mutagenic activities but that they may still participate in some other, unknown process which provides the continued stimulus for their retention.     

Error-prone repair and translesion synthesis III: the activation of UmuD (or less is more)

Following DNA damage to Escherichia coli bacteria, RecA protein is activated by binding to single stranded DNA and cleaves its own gene repressor (LexA protein). Two papers from Graham Walker's laboratory showed that several bacterial genes in addition to RecA are repressed by the LexA repressor and are inducible following DNA damage [C.J. Keyon, G.C. Walker, DNA-damaging agents stimulate gene expression at specific loci in Escherichia coli, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 77, 1980, pp. 2819--2823] and predicted that one of them (UmuD) might itself be subject to activation by a further cleavage reaction involving activated RecA protein [K.L. Perry, S.J. Elledge, B.B. Mitchell, L. Marsh, G.C. Walker, umuD,C and mucA,B operans whose products are required for UV light- and chemical-induced mutagenesis: UmuD, MucA, and LexA proteins share homology, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 82, 1985, pp. 4331--4335]. The processed form of UmuD, termed UmuD', later proved to be a subunit of DNA polymerase V, a key enzyme involved in translesion synthesis.     

The genetic requirements for UmuDC-mediated cold sensitivity are distinct from those for SOS mutagenesis.

The umuDC operon of Escherichia coli, a member of the SOS regulon, is required for SOS mutagenesis. Following the posttranslational processing of UmuD to UmuD' by RecA-mediated cleavage, UmuD' acts in concert with UmuC, RecA, and DNA polymerase III to facilitate the process of translesion synthesis, which results in the introduction of mutations. Constitutive expression of the umuDC operon causes an inhibition of growth at 30 degrees C (cold sensitivity). The umuDC-dependent physiological phenomenon manifested as cold-sensitive growth is shown to differ from SOS mutagenesis in two respects. Intact UmuD, the form inactive in SOS mutagenesis, confers a significantly higher degree of cold sensitivity in combination with UmUC than does UmuD'. In addition, umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity, unlike SOS mutagenesis, does not require recA function. Since the RecA protein mediates the autodigestion of UnmD to UmuD', this finding supports the conclusion that intact UmuD is capable of conferring cold sensitivity in the presence of UmuC. The degree of inhibition of growth at 30 degrees C correlates with the levels of UmuD and UmuC, which are the only two SOS-regulated proteins required to observe cold sensitivity. Analysis of the cellular morphology of strains that exhibit cold sensitivity for growth led to the finding that constitutive expression of the umuDC operon causes a novel form of sulA- and sfiC-independent filamentation at 30 degrees C. This filamentation is observed in a strain constitutively expressing the single, chromosomal copy of umuDC and can be suppressed by overexpression of the ftsQAZ operon.     

Genetic interactions between the Escherichia coli umuDC gene products and the beta processivity clamp of the replicative DNA polymerase

The Escherichia coli umuDC gene products encode DNA polymerase V, which participates in both translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and a DNA damage checkpoint control. These two temporally distinct roles of the umuDC gene products are regulated by RecA-single-stranded DNA-facilitated self-cleavage of UmuD (which participates in the checkpoint control) to yield UmuD' (which enables TLS). In addition, even modest overexpression of the umuDC gene products leads to a cold-sensitive growth phenotype, apparently due to the inappropriate expression of the DNA damage checkpoint control activity of UmuD(2)C. We have previously reported that overexpression of the epsilon proofreading subunit of DNA polymerase III suppresses umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity, suggesting that interaction of epsilon with UmuD(2)C is important for the DNA damage checkpoint control function of the umuDC gene products. Here, we report that overexpression of the beta processivity clamp of the E. coli replicative DNA polymerase (encoded by the dnaN gene) not only exacerbates the cold sensitivity conferred by elevated levels of the umuDC gene products but, in addition, confers a severe cold-sensitive phenotype upon a strain expressing moderately elevated levels of the umuD'C gene products. Such a strain is not otherwise normally cold sensitive. To identify mutant beta proteins possibly deficient for physical interactions with the umuDC gene products, we selected for novel dnaN alleles unable to confer a cold-sensitive growth phenotype upon a umuD'C-overexpressing strain. In all, we identified 75 dnaN alleles, 62 of which either reduced the expression of beta or prematurely truncated its synthesis, while the remaining alleles defined eight unique missense mutations of dnaN. Each of the dnaN missense mutations retained at least a partial ability to function in chromosomal DNA replication in vivo. In addition, these eight dnaN alleles were also unable to exacerbate the cold sensitivity conferred by modestly elevated levels of the umuDC gene products, suggesting that the interactions between UmuD' and beta are a subset of those between UmuD and beta. Taken together, these findings suggest that interaction of beta with UmuD(2)C is important for the DNA damage checkpoint function of the umuDC gene products. Four possible models for how interactions of UmuD(2)C with the epsilon and the beta subunits of DNA polymerase III might help to regulate DNA replication in response to DNA damage are discussed.     

The bacteriophage P1 HumD protein is a functional homolog of the prokaryotic UmuD'-like proteins and facilitates SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli umuD and umuC genes comprise an operon and encode proteins that are involved in the mutagenic bypass of normally replication-inhibiting DNA lesions. UmuD is, however, unable to function in this process until it undergoes a RecA-mediated cleavage reaction to generate UmuD'. Many homologs of umuDC have now been identified. Most are located on bacterial chromosomes or on broad-host-range R plasmids. One such putative homolog, humD (homolog of umuD) is, however, found on the bacteriophage P1 genome. Interestingly, humD differs from other umuD homologs in that it encodes a protein similar in size to the posttranslationally generated UmuD' protein and not UmuD, nor is it in an operon with a cognate umuC partner. To determine if HumD is, in fact, a bona fide homolog of the prokaryotic UmuD'-like mutagenesis proteins, we have analyzed the ability of HumD to complement UmuD' functions in vivo as well as examined HumD's physical properties in vitro. When expressed from a high-copy-number plasmid, HumD restored cellular mutagenesis and increased UV survival to normally nonmutable recA430 lexA(Def) and UV-sensitive DeltaumuDC recA718 lexA(Def) strains, respectively. Complementing activity was reduced when HumD was expressed from a low-copy-number plasmid, but this observation is explained by immunoanalysis which indicates that HumD is normally poorly expressed in vivo. In vitro analysis revealed that like UmuD', HumD forms a stable dimer in solution and is able to interact with E. coli UmuC and RecA nucleoprotein filaments. We conclude, therefore, that bacteriophage P1 HumD is a functional homolog of the UmuD'-like proteins, and we speculate as to the reasons why P1 might require the activity of such a protein in vivo.     

Common protein architecture and binding sites in proteases utilizing a Ser/Lys dyad mechanism

Escherichia coli signal peptidase (SPase) and E. coli UmuD protease are members of an evolutionary clan of serine proteases that apparently utilize a serine-lysine catalytic dyad mechanism. Recently, the crystallographic structure of a SPase inhibitor complex was solved elucidating the catalytic residues and the substrate binding subsites. Here we show a detailed comparison of the E. coli SPase structure to the native E. coli UmuD' structure. The comparison reveals that despite a very low sequence identity these functionally diverse enzymes share the same protein fold within their catalytic core and allows by analogy for the assignment of the cleavage-site orientation and substrate binding subsites in the UmuD(D') protease. The structural alignment of SPase and UmuD' predicts important mechanistic and structural similarities and differences within these newly characterized families of serine proteases.     

Proteolytic processing of MucA protein in SOS mutagenesis: Both processed and unprocessed MucA may be active in the mutagenesis

Summary The mucAB operon carried on plasmid pKM101, which is an analogue of the umuDC operon of Escherichia coli, is involved in UV mutagenesis and mutagenesis induced by many chemicals. Mutagenesis dependent on either the umuDC or mucAB operon requires the function of the recA gene and is called SOS mutagenesis. By treating the cell with agents that damage DNA, RecA protein is activated by conversion into a form (RecA^*) that mediates proteolytic cleavage of the LexA repressor and derepresses the SOS genes including mucAB. Since UmuD protein is proteolytically processed to an active form (UmuD^*) in a RecA^*-dependent fashion, and MucA shares extensive amino acid homology with UmuD, we examined whether MucA is similarly processed in the cell, using antiserum against a LacZ-MucA fusion protein. Like UmuD, MucA protein is indeed proteolytically processed in a RecA^*-dependent fashion. In recA430 strains, MucAB but not UmuDC can mediate UV mutagenesis. However, MucA was not processed in the recA430 cells treated with mitomycin C. We constructed, by site-directed mutagenesis, several mutant mucA genes that encode MucA proteins with alterations in the amino acids flanking the putative cleavage site (Ala25-Gly26). MucA(Cys25) was processed and was as mutagenically active as wild-type MucA; MucA(Asp26) and MucA(Cys25,Asp26) were not processed, and were mutagenically inactive; MucA-(Thr25) was not processed, but was mutagenically as active as wild-type MucA. The mutant mucA gene that encoded the putative cleavage product of MucA was as active as mucA ⁺ in UV mutagenesis. These results raise the possibility that both the nascent MucA and the processed product are active in mutagenesis.