Protein-protein crystal-packing contacts.

Protein-protein contacts in monomeric protein crystal structures have been analyzed and compared to the physiological protein-protein contacts in oligomerization. A number of features differentiate the crystal-packing contacts from the natural contacts occurring in multimeric proteins. The area of the protein surface patches involved in packing contacts is generally smaller and its amino acid composition is indistinguishable from that of the protein surface accessible to the solvent. The fraction of protein surface in crystal contacts is very variable and independent of the number of packing contacts. The thermal motion at the crystal packing interface and that of the protein core, even for large packing interfaces, though the tendency is to be closer to that of the core. These results suggest that protein crystallization depends on random protein-protein interactions, which have little in common with physiological protein-protein recognition processes, and that the possibility of engineering macromolecular crystallization to improve crystal quality could be widened.     

Interresidue contacts in proteins and protein-protein interfaces and their use in characterizing the homodimeric interface

The environment of amino acid residues in protein tertiary structures and three types of interfaces formed by protein-protein association--in complexes, homodimers, and crystal lattices of monomeric proteins--has been analyzed in terms of the propensity values of the 20 amino acid residues to be in contact with a given residue. On the basis of the similarity of the environment, twenty residues can be divided into nine classes, which may correspond to a set of reduced amino acid alphabet. There is no appreciable change in the environment in going from the tertiary structure to the interface, those participating in the crystal contacts showing the maximum deviation. Contacts between identical residues are very prominent in homodimers and crystal dimers and arise due to 2-fold related association of residues lining the axis of rotation. These two types of interfaces, representing specific and nonspecific associations, are characterized by the types of residues that partake in "self-contacts"--most notably Leu in the former and Glu in the latter. The relative preference of residues to be involved in "self-contacts" can be used to develop a scoring function to identify homodimeric proteins from crystal structures. Thirty-four percent of such residues are fully conserved among homologous proteins in the homodimer dataset, as opposed to only 20% in crystal dimers. Results point to Leu being the stickiest of all amino acid residues, hence its widespread use in motifs, such as leucine zippers.     

Extent and nature of contacts between protein molecules in crystal lattices and between subunits of protein oligomers

A survey was compiled of several characteristics of the intersubunit contacts in 58 oligomeric proteins, and of the intermolecular contacts in the lattice for 223 protein crystal structures. The total number of atoms in contact and the secondary structure elements involved are similar in the two types of interfaces. Crystal contact patches are frequently smaller than patches involved in oligomer interfaces. Crystal contacts result from more numerous interactions by polar residues, compared with a tendency toward nonpolar amino acids at oligomer interfaces. Arginine is the only amino acid prominent in both types of interfaces. Potentials of mean force for residue–residue contacts at both crystal and oligomer interfaces were derived from comparison of the number of observed residue–residue interactions with the number expected by mass action. They show that hydrophobic interactions at oligomer interfaces favor aromatic amino acids and methionine over aliphatic amino acids; and that crystal contacts form in such a way as to avoid inclusion of hydrophobic interactions. They also suggest that complex salt bridges with certain amino acid compositions might be important in oligomer formation. For a protein that is recalcitrant to crystallization, substitution of lysine residues with arginine or glutamine is a recommended strategy. Proteins 28:494–514, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Peptide segments in protein-protein interfaces

An important component of functional genomics involves the understanding of protein association. The interfaces resulting from protein-protein interactions - (i) specific, as represented by the homodimeric quaternary structures and the complexes formed by two independently occurring protein components, and (ii) non-specific, as observed in the crystal lattice of monomeric proteins - have been analysed on the basis of the length and the number of peptide segments. In 1000 A2 of the interface area, contributed by a polypeptide chain, there would be 3.4 segments in homodimers, 5.6 in complexes and 6.3 in crystal contacts. Concomitantly, the segments are the longest (with 8.7 interface residues) in homodimers. Core segments (likely to contribute more towards binding) are more in number in homodimers (1.7) than in crystal contacts (0.5), and this number can be used as one of the parameters to distinguish between the two types of interfaces. Dominant segments involved in specific interactions, along with their secondary structural features, are enumerated.     

A dissection of the protein-protein interfaces in icosahedral virus capsids

We selected 49 icosahedral virus capsids whose crystal structures are reported in the Protein Data Bank. They belong to the T=1, T=3, pseudo T=3 and other lattice types. We identified in them 779 unique interfaces between pairs of subunits, all repeated by icosahedral symmetry. We analyzed the geometric and physical chemical properties of these interfaces and compared with interfaces in protein-protein complexes and homodimeric proteins, and with crystal packing contacts. The capsids contain one to 16 subunits implicated in three to 66 unique interfaces. Each subunit loses 40-60% of its accessible surface in contacts with an average of 8.5 neighbors. Many of the interfaces are very large with a buried surface area (BSA) that can exceed 10,000 A(2), yet 39% are small with a BSA<800 A(2) comparable to crystal packing contacts. Pairwise capsid interfaces overlap, so that one-third of the residues are part of more than one interface. Those with a BSA>800 A(2) resemble homodimer interfaces in their chemical composition. Relative to the protein surface, they are non-polar, enriched in aliphatic residues and depleted of charged residues, but not of neutral polar residues. They contain one H-bond per about 200 A(2) BSA. Small capsid interfaces (BSA<800 A(2)) are only slightly more polar. They have a similar amino acid composition, but they bury fewer atoms and contain fewer H-bonds for their size. Geometric parameters that estimate the quality of the atomic packing suggest that the small capsid interfaces are loosely packed like crystal packing contacts, whereas the larger interfaces are close-packed as in protein-protein complexes and homodimers. We discuss implications of these findings on the mechanism of capsid assembly, assuming that the larger interfaces form first to yield stable oligomeric species (capsomeres), and that medium-size interfaces allow the stepwise addition of capsomeres to build larger intermediates.     

Statistical analysis of predominantly transient protein-protein interfaces

A non-redundant set of 170 protein-protein interfaces of known structure was statistically analyzed for residue and secondary-structure compositions, pairing preferences and side-chain-backbone interaction frequencies. By focussing mainly on transient protein-protein interfaces, the results underline previous findings for protein-protein interfaces but also show some new interesting aspects of transient interfaces. The residue compositions at interfaces found in this study correlate well with the results of other studies. On average, contacts between pairs of hydrophobic and polar residues were unfavorable, and the charged residues tended to pair subject to charge complementarity. Secondary structure composition analysis shows that neither helices nor beta-sheets are dominantly populated at interfaces. Analyzing the pairing preferences of the secondary structure elements revealed a higher affinity within the same elements and alludes to tight packings. In addition, the results for the side-chain and backbone interaction frequencies, which were measured under more stringent conditions, showed a high occurrence of side-chain-backbone interactions. Taking a closer look at the helix and beta-sheet binding frequencies for a given side-chain and backbone interaction underlined the relevance of tight packings. The polarity of interfaces increased with decreasing interface size. These types of information may be useful for scoring complexes in protein-protein docking studies or for prediction of protein-protein interfaces from the sequences alone.     

An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces

Protein structures were collected from the Brookhaven Database of tertiary architectures that displayed oligomeric association (24 molecules) or whose polypeptide folding revealed domains (34 proteins). The subunit and domain interfaces for these proteins were respectively examined from the following aspects: percentage water-accessible surface area buried by the respective associations, surface compositions and physical characteristics of the residues involved in the subunit and domain contacts, secondary structural state of the interface amino acids, preferred polar and non-polar interactions, spatial distribution of polar and non-polar residues on the interface surface, same residue interactions in the oligomeric contacts, and overall cross-section and shape of the contact surfaces. A general, consistent picture emerged for both the domain and subunit interfaces.     

Distinct roles of overlapping and non-overlapping regions of hub protein interfaces in recognition of multiple partners

Cellular functions of an organism are maintained by protein-protein interactions. Those proteins that bind multiple partners asynchronously (date hub proteins) are important to make the interaction network coordinated. It is known that many date hub proteins bind different partners at overlapping (OV) interfaces. To understand how OV interfaces of date hub proteins can recognize multiple partners, we analyzed the difference between OV and non-overlapping (Non-OV) regions of interfaces involved in the binding of different partners. By using the structures of 16 date hub proteins with various interaction partners (ranging from 5 to 33), we compared buried surface area, compositions of amino acid residues and secondary structures, and side-chain orientations. It was found that buried interface residues are important for recognizing multiple partners, while exposed interface residues are important for determining specificity to a particular ligand. In addition, our analyses reveal that residue compositions in OV and Non-OV regions are different and that residues in OV region show diverse side-chain torsion angles to accommodate binding to multiple targets.     

A combinatorial score to distinguish biological and nonbiological protein-protein interfaces

With the large amount of protein-protein complex structural data available, to understand the key features governing the specificity of protein-protein recognition and to define a suitable scoring function for protein-protein interaction predictions, we have analyzed the protein interfaces from geometric and energetic points of view. Atom-based potential of mean force (PMFScore), packing density, contact size, and geometric complementarity are calculated for crystal contacts in 74 homodimers and 91 monomers, which include real biological interactions in dimers and nonbiological contacts in monomers and dimers. Simple cutoffs were developed for single and combinatorial parameters to distinguish biological and nonbiological contacts. The results show that PMFScore is a better discriminator between biological and nonbiological interfaces comparable in size. The combination of PMFScore and contact size is the most powerful pairwise discriminator. A combinatorial score (CFPScore) based on the four parameters was developed, which gives the success rate of the homodimer discrimination of 96.6% and error rate of the monomer discrimination of 6.0% and 19.8% according to Valdar's and our definition, respectively. Compared with other statistical learning models, the cutoffs for the four parameters and their combinations are directly based on physical models, simple, and can be easily applied to protein-protein interface analysis and docking studies.     

Protein–protein interaction at crystal contacts

Packing contacts are crystal artifacts, yet they make use of the same forces that govern specific recognition in protein-protein complexes and oligomeric proteins. They provide examples of a nonspecific protein-protein interaction which can be compared to biologically relevant ones. We evaluate the number and size of pairwise interfaces in 152 crystal forms where the asymmetric unit contains a monomeric protein. In those crystal forms that have no element of 2-fold symmetry, we find that molecules form 8 to 10 pairwise interfaces. The total area of the surface buried on each molecule is large, up to 4400 Ų. Pairwise interfaces bury 200–1200 Ų, like interfaces generated at random in a computer simulation, and less than interfaces in protease-inhibitor or antigen-antibody complexes, which bury 1500 Ų or more. Thus, specific contacts occurring in such complexes extend over a larger surface than nonspecific ones. In crystal forms with 2-fold symmetry, pairwise interfaces are fewer and larger on average than in the absence of 2-fold symmetry. Some bury 1500–2500 Ų, like interfaces in oligomeric proteins, and create “crystal oligomers” which may have formed in the solution before crystallizing. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure

Protein-protein recognition plays an essential role in structure and function. Specific non-covalent interactions stabilize the structure of macromolecular assemblies, exemplified in this review by oligomeric proteins and the capsids of icosahedral viruses. They also allow proteins to form complexes that have a very wide range of stability and lifetimes and are involved in all cellular processes. We present some of the structure-based computational methods that have been developed to characterize the quaternary structure of oligomeric proteins and other molecular assemblies and analyze the properties of the interfaces between the subunits. We compare the size, the chemical and amino acid compositions and the atomic packing of the subunit interfaces of protein-protein complexes, oligomeric proteins, viral capsids and protein-nucleic acid complexes. These biologically significant interfaces are generally close-packed, whereas the non-specific interfaces between molecules in protein crystals are loosely packed, an observation that gives a structural basis to specific recognition. A distinction is made within each interface between a core that contains buried atoms and a solvent accessible rim. The core and the rim differ in their amino acid composition and their conservation in evolution, and the distinction helps correlating the structural data with the results of site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro studies of self-assembly.     

Hydration of protein-protein interfaces

We present an analysis of the water molecules immobilized at the protein-protein interfaces of 115 homodimeric proteins and 46 protein-protein complexes, and compare them with 173 large crystal packing interfaces representing nonspecific interactions. With an average of 15 waters per 1000 A2 of interface area, the crystal packing interfaces are more hydrated than the specific interfaces of homodimers and complexes, which have 10-11 waters per 1000 A2, reflecting the more hydrophilic composition of crystal packing interfaces. Very different patterns of hydration are observed: Water molecules may form a ring around interfaces that remain "dry," or they may permeate "wet" interfaces. A majority of the specific interfaces are dry and most of the crystal packing interfaces are wet, but counterexamples exist in both categories. Water molecules at interfaces form hydrogen bonds with protein groups, with a preference for the main-chain carbonyl and the charged side-chains of Glu, Asp, and Arg. These interactions are essentially the same in specific and nonspecific interfaces, and very similar to those observed elsewhere on the protein surface. Water-mediated polar interactions are as abundant at the interfaces as direct protein-protein hydrogen bonds, and they may contribute to the stability of the assembly.     

Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces

We used a nonredundant set of 621 protein-protein interfaces of known high-resolution structure to derive residue composition and residue-residue contact preferences. The residue composition at the interfaces, in entire proteins and in whole genomes correlates well, indicating the statistical strength of the data set. Differences between amino acid distributions were observed for interfaces with buried surface area of less than 1,000 A(2) versus interfaces with area of more than 5,000 A(2). Hydrophobic residues were abundant in large interfaces while polar residues were more abundant in small interfaces. The largest residue-residue preferences at the interface were recorded for interactions between pairs of large hydrophobic residues, such as Trp and Leu, and the smallest preferences for pairs of small residues, such as Gly and Ala. On average, contacts between pairs of hydrophobic and polar residues were unfavorable, and the charged residues tended to pair subject to charge complementarity, in agreement with previous reports. A bootstrap procedure, lacking from previous studies, was used for error estimation. It showed that the statistical errors in the set of pairing preferences are generally small; the average standard error is approximately 0.2, i.e., about 8% of the average value of the pairwise index (2.9). However, for a few pairs (e.g., Ser-Ser and Glu-Asp) the standard error is larger in magnitude than the pairing index, which makes it impossible to tell whether contact formation is favorable or unfavorable. The results are interpreted using physicochemical factors and their implications for the energetics of complex formation and for protein docking are discussed. Proteins 2001;43:89-102.     

Residue conservation in viral capsid assembly

To evaluate the evolutionary constraints placed on viral proteins by the structure and assembly of the capsid, we calculate Shannon entropies in the aligned sequences of 45 polypeptide chains in 32 icosahedral viruses, and relate these entropies to the residue location in the three-dimensional structure of the capsids. Three categories of residues have entropies lower than the chain average implying that they are better conserved than average: residues that are buried within a subunit (the protein core), residues that contain atoms buried at an interface between subunits (the interface core), and residues that contribute to several such interfaces. The interface core is also conserved in homomeric proteins and in transient protein-protein complexes, which have only one interface whereas capsids have many. In capsids, the subunit interfaces implicate most of the polypeptide chain: on average, 66% of the capsid residues are at an interface, 34% at more than one, and 47% at the interface core. Nevertheless, we observe that the degree of residue conservation can vary widely between interfaces within a capsid and between regions within an interface. The interfaces and regions of interfaces that show a low sequence variability are likely to play major roles in the self-assembly of the capsid, with implications on its mechanism that we discuss taking adeno-associated virus as an example.     

Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state

Scores calculated from intermolecular contacts of proteins in the crystalline state are used to differentiate monomeric and homodimeric proteins, by classification into two categories separated by a cut-off score value. The generalized classification error is estimated by using bootstrap re-sampling on a nonredundant set of 172 water-soluble proteins whose prevalent quaternary state in solution is known to be either monomeric or homodimeric. A statistical potential, based on atom-pair frequencies across interfaces observed with homodimers, is found to yield an error rate of 12.5%. This indicates a small but significant improvement over the measure of solvent accessible surface area buried in the contact interface, which achieves an error rate of 15.4%. A further modification of the latter parameter relating the two most extensive contacts of the crystal results in an even lower error rate of 11.1%.     

Interaction geometry involving planar groups in protein-protein interfaces

The geometry of interactions of planar residues is nonrandom in protein tertiary structures and gives rise to conventional, as well as nonconventional (X--H...pi, X--H...O, where X = C, N, or O) hydrogen bonds. Whether a similar geometry is maintained when the interaction is across the protein-protein interface is addressed here. The relative geometries of interactions involving planar residues, and the percentage of contacts giving rise to different types of hydrogen bonds are quite similar in protein structures and the biological interfaces formed by protein chains in homodimers and protein-protein heterocomplexes--thus pointing to the similarity of chemical interactions that occurs during protein folding and binding. However, the percentage is considerably smaller in the nonspecific and nonphysiological interfaces that are formed in crystal lattices of monomeric proteins. The C--H...O interaction linking the aromatic and the peptide groups is quite common in protein structures as well as the three types of interfaces. However, as the interfaces formed by crystal contacts are depleted in aromatic residues, the weaker hydrogen bond interactions would contribute less toward their stability.     

Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions

Protein-protein complexes that dissociate and associate readily, often depending on the physiological condition or environment, play an important role in many biological processes. In order to characterise these "transient" protein-protein interactions, two sets of complexes were collected and analysed. The first set consists of 16 experimentally validated "weak" transient homodimers, which are known to exist as monomers and dimers at physiological concentration, with dissociation constants in the micromolar range. A set of 23 functionally validated transient (i.e. intracellular signalling) heterodimers comprise the second set. This set includes complexes that are more stable, with nanomolar binding affinities, and require a molecular trigger to form and break the interaction. In comparison to more stable homodimeric complexes, the weak homodimers demonstrate smaller contact areas between protomers and the interfaces are more planar and polar on average. The physicochemical and geometrical properties of these weak homodimers more closely resemble those of non-obligate hetero-oligomeric complexes, whose components can exist either as monomers or as complexes in vivo. In contrast to the weak transient dimers, "strong" transient dimers often undergo large conformational changes upon association/dissociation and are characterised with larger, less planar and sometimes more hydrophobic interfaces. From sequence alignments we find that the interface residues of the weak transient homodimers are generally more conserved than surface residues, consistent with being constrained to maintain the protein-protein interaction during evolution. Protein families that include members with different oligomeric states or structures are identified, and found to exhibit a lower sequence conservation at the interface. The results are discussed in terms of the physiological function and evolution of protein-protein interactions.     

Evolvability of yeast protein-protein interaction interfaces

The functional importance of protein-protein interactions indicates that there should be strong evolutionary constraint on their interaction interfaces. However, binding interfaces are frequently affected by amino acid replacements. Change due to coevolution within interfaces can contribute to variability but is not ubiquitous. An alternative explanation for the ability of surfaces to accept replacements may be that many residues can be changed without affecting the interaction. Candidates for these types of residues are those that make interchain interaction only through the protein main chain, β-carbon, or associated hydrogen atoms. Since almost all residues have these atoms, we hypothesize that this subset of interface residues may be more easily substituted than those that make interactions through other atoms. We term such interactions "residue type independent." Investigating this hypothesis, we find that nearly a quarter of residues in protein interaction interfaces make exclusively interchain residue-type-independent contacts. These residues are less structurally constrained and less conserved than residues making residue-type-specific interactions. We propose that residue-type-independent interactions allow substitutions in binding interfaces while the specificity of binding is maintained.     

T4溶菌酶晶体分子堆积的研究

以不对称单位中只有一个分子的１０种不同晶型的Ｔ４溶菌酶晶体为材料,对晶体中的分子堆积进行了研究,结果表明,在溶剂含量较高的晶型中,非极性基团在接触面积中所占的比例略高于溶剂含量较低的晶型,而其极性和带电荷基团在接触面积中所占的比例略低于溶剂含量较低的晶型。溶剂含量较高的晶型多含有晶体学二重轴,二重轴相关的分子间的接触与其他接触相比,含有较少的极性相互作用。这些结果说明溶剂含量的高低可能是由不同结晶