The relationship between aromatase in primary breast tumors and response to treatment with aromatase inhibitors in advanced disease

Aromatase inhibitors are proving to be more effective than tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. Estrogen concentrations in the breast are similar in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and several fold higher than circulating levels in postmenopausal women. In order to investigate the importance of intratumoral aromatase in stimulating the proliferation of the tumor, we used immunocytochemistry to determine the extent of aromatase expression in relationship to the response of the patient to aromatase inhibitor treatment. The relationship between positive staining for aromatase in the primary tumor and response to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor was investigated in a retrospective study of 102 patients with advanced breast cancer. Immunohistochemical staining using a monoclonal antibody against aromatase was performed on paraffin embedded tumor tissue. Response was evaluated using UICC criteria. Nine out of 13 patients with objective response to treatment stained positive and 49 of 89 patients with stable or progressive disease stained positive. No significant relationship between positive staining and objective response to treatment could be found. When patients with 'clinical benefit' (i.e. objective response plus prolonged stable disease of at least 6 months) were considered, also no relationship could be found. Further analysis of subgroups with positive hormone receptors, treatment with newer generation aromatase inhibitors, single metastatic site, non-visceral metastases and previous treatment only with tamoxifen did not show any relationship. Tumor aromatase expression did not correlate with response of patients with advanced breast cancer to aromatase inhibitor treatment. Most patients had relapsed from other treatments before receiving an aromatase inhibitor. It seems likely that many of these patients had tumors that may have progressed to hormone independence at this stage of the disease. Research in patients who have received treatment with aromatase inhibitors in earlier stages of disease (first line and adjuvant treatment) may provide further information on the relationship between tumor aromatase, steroid receptors and response to inhibitor treatment.     

Mechanisms of the actions of aromatase inhibitors 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, fadrozole, and aminoglutethimide on aromatase in JEG-3 cell culture

Selective inhibition of estrogen production with aromatase inhibitors has been found to be an effective strategy for breast cancer treatment. Most studies have focused on inhibitor screening and in vitro kinetic analysis of aromatase inhibition using placental microsomes. In order to determine the effects of different inhibitors on aromatase in the whole cell, we have utilized the human choriocarcinoma cell line, JEG-3 in culture to compare and study three classes of aromatase inhibitors, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, fadrozole (CGS 16949A), and aminoglutethimide. Fadrozole is the most potent competitive inhibitor and aminoglutethimide is the least potent among the three. However, stimulation of aromatase activity was found to occur when JEG-3 cells were preincubated with aminoglutethimide. In contrast, 4-OHA and fadrozole caused sustained inhibition of aromatase activity in both JEG-3 cells and placental microsomes, which was not reversed even after the removal of the inhibitors. 4-OHA bound irreversibly to the active site of aromatase and caused inactivation of the enzyme which followed pseudo-first order kinetics. However, 4-OHA appears to be metabolized rapidly in JEG-3 cells. Sustained inhibition of aromatase induced by fadrozole occurs by a different mechanism. Although fadrozole bound tightly to aromatase at a site distinct from the steroid binding site, the inhibition of aromatase activity by fadrozole does not involve a reactive process. None of the inhibitors stimulated aromatase mRNA synthesis in JEG-3 cells during 8 h treatment. The stimulation of aromatase activity by AG appeared to be due to stabilization of aromatase protein. According to these results, 4-OHA and fadrozole would be expected to be more beneficial in the treatment of breast cancer patients than AG. The increase in aromatase activity by AG may counteract its therapeutic effect and might be partially responsible for relapse of breast cancer patients from this treatment.     

Aromatase and its inhibitors

Inhibitors of aromatase (estrogen synthetase) have been developed as treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. Both steroidal substrate analogs, type I inhibitors, which inactivate the enzyme and non-steroidal competitive reversible, type II inhibitors, are now available. 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first selective aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce serum estrogen concentrations and cause complete and partial responses in approximately 25% of patients with hormone responsive disease who have relapsed from previous endocrine treatment. Letrozole (CGS 20, 269) and anastrozole (ZN 1033) have been recently approved for treatment. Both suppress serum estrogen levels to the limit of assay detection. Letrozole has been shown to be significantly superior to megace in overall response rates and time to treatment failure, whereas anastrozole was found to improve survival in comparison to megace. Both were better tolerated than the latter. The potential of aromatase within the breast as a significant source of estrogen mediating tumor proliferation and which might determine the outcome of inhibitor treatment was explored. Using immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization, aromatase and mRNA_arom was detected mainly in the epithelial cells of the terminal ductal lobular units (TDLU) of the normal breast and also in breast tumor epithelial cells as well as some stromal cells. Increase in proliferation, measured by increased thymidine incorporation into DNA and by PCNA immunostaining in response to testosterone was observed in histocultures of breast cancer samples. This effect could be inhibited by 4-OHA and implies that intratumoral aromatase has functional significance. An intratumoral aromatase model in the ovariectomized nude mouse was developed which simulated the hormone responsive postmenopausal breast cancer patient. This model also allows evaluation of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens in tumors of estrogen receptor positive, human breast carcinoma cells transfected with the human aromatase gene. Thus, the cells synthesized estrogen which stimulated tumor formation. Both aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens were effective in suppressing tumor growth in this model. However, letrozole was more effective than tamoxifen. When the aromatase inhibitors were combined with tamoxifen, tumor growth was suppressed to about the same extent as with the aromatase inhibitors alone. Thus, there was no additive or synergistic effects of combining tamoxifen with aromatase inhibitors. This suggests that sequential treatment with these agents is likely to be more beneficial to the patient in terms of longer response to treatment.     

Aromatase and COX-2 expression in human breast cancers

We have investigated aromatase and the inducible cyclooxygenase COX-2 expression using immunocytochemistry in tumors of a series of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors. Aromatase was expressed in 58/102 breast cancers. This is similar to the percentage previously reported for aromatase activity. Interestingly, aromatase was expressed in a variety of cell types, including tumor, stromal, adipose, and endothelial cells. Since prostaglandin E₂ is known to regulate aromatase gene expression and is the product of COX-2, an enzyme frequently overexpressed in tumors, immunocytochemistry was performed on the tissue sections using a polyclonal antibody to COX-2. Aromatase was strongly correlated (P<0.001) with COX-2 expression. These results suggest that PGE₂ produced by COX-2 in the tumor may be important in stimulating estrogen synthesis in the tumor and surrounding tissue. No correlation was observed between aromatase or COX-2 expression and the response of the patients to aromatase inhibitor treatment. However, only 13 patients responded. Nine of these patients were aromatase positive. Although similar to responses in other studies, this low response rate to second line treatment suggests that tumors of most patients were no longer sensitive to the effects of estrogen. Recent clinical studies suggest that greater responses occur when aromatase inhibitors are used as first line treatment. In the intratumoral aromatase mouse model, expression of aromatase in tumors is highly correlated with increased tumor growth. First line treatment with letrozole was effective in all animals treated and was more effective than tamoxifen in suppressing tumor growth. Letrozole was also effective in tumors failing to respond to tamoxifen, consistent with clinical findings. In addition, the duration of response was significantly longer with the aromatase inhibitor than with tamoxifen, suggesting that aromatase inhibitors may offer better control of tumor growth than this antiestrogen.     

Local endocrine effects of aromatase inhibitors within the breast

To determine the effects of aromatase inhibitors on oestrogen uptake, in situ aromatase activity and endogenous oestrogens in the breast, postmenopausal women with large primary ER-rich breast cancers have been treated neoadjuvantly for 3 months with either letrozole (2.5 or 10 mg daily) or anastrozole (1 or 10 mg daily) or exemestane (25 mg daily). Patients were given an infusion of ³H-androstenedione and ¹⁴C-oestrone for 18 h before and at the end of the study period. Blood, tumour and non-malignant breast were taken immediately after each infusion; oestrogens were extracted and purified. Tumour volume was measured before and during treatment at monthly intervals so that endocrinological changes could be related to clinical response. Treatment with each of the aromatase inhibitors was associated with a profound reduction in peripheral aromatase (as monitored by the level of plasma ³H-oestrone). There was no consistent effect on uptake of radioactively labelled oestrogen into breast tumours but a tendency for levels to increase after treatment in non-malignant breast. Conversely, therapy was associated with a marked inhibition of in situ oestrogen synthesis in both tumour and non-malignant breast (in occasional tissues, inhibitors appeared to be less effective but the effect was not related to clinical or pathological responses). Similar decreases were apparent in endogenous levels of oestrone and oestradiol. The absence of in situ aromatase activity tended to be associated with lack of clinical response to aromatase inhibition but the relationship was not absolute, limiting the utility of measurements of tumour aromatase as a predictive indices. Ex vivo studies of tissue aromatase indicated that such measurements consistently underestimate the inhibitory potential of reversible non-steroidal agents (and occasionally paradoxical in vitro increases in aromatase activity were seen with treatment). However, in situ assays demonstrate that new aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole have profound effects on the local endocrinology within the postmenopausal breast, these being compatible with the clinico-pathological changes which occur with treatment.     

Inhibition of aromatase: insights from recent studies

Aromatase is the rate limiting enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens. Blockade of this step allows treatment of diseases that are dependent upon estrogen. Over the past two decades, highly potent and specific aromatase inhibitors have been developed which block total body aromatization by over 99%. An important recent question is whether aromatase inhibitors are superior to the antiestrogens for treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. The third generation aromatase inhibitors have been compared to tamoxifen for the treatment of breast cancer in the advanced, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. All of these studies suggest the superiority of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen. The mechanism responsible for the superiority of the aromatase inhibitors relates to the estrogen agonistic effects of tamoxifen. During exposure to estrogen deprived conditions and to tamoxifen, breast cancer cells adapt and upregulate the MAP kinase and PI-3 kinase pathways. These growth factor signaling pathways potentiate the estrogen agonistic properties of tamoxifen. Data from a large adjuvant therapy trial (ATAC trial) provide evidence that the aromatase inhibitors may also be superior for breast cancer prevention. The mechanism for superiority in this setting probably relates to the genotoxic effects of estradiol metabolites. The aromatase inhibitors may be also useful for the treatment of endometriosis and for ovulation induction as evidenced by preliminary data. The recent advances in development of the aromatase inhibitors clearly demonstrate the utility of these agents for treatment of breast cancer and potentially for other indications.     

Molecular mechanisms of aromatase inhibition by new A, D-ring modified steroids

Abstract A recent approach for treatment and prevention of estrogen-dependent breast cancer focuses on the inhibition of aromatase, the enzyme that catalyzes the final step of estrogen biosynthesis. Some synthetic steroids, such as formestane and exemestane, resembling the natural enzyme substrate androstenedione, revealed to be potent and useful aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and were approved for the treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Recently, we found that five newly synthesized steroids with chemical features in the A- and D-rings considered important for drug-receptor interaction efficiently inhibit aromatase derived from human placental microsomes. In this work, these steroids showed a similar pattern of anti-aromatase activity in several aromatase-expressing cell lines. 5alpha-androst-3-en-17-one and 3alpha,4alpha-epoxy-5alpha-androstan-17-one were revealed to be the most potent inhibitors. These compounds induced a time-dependent inhibition of aromatase, showing to be irreversible AIs. The specific interactions of these compounds with aromatase active sites were further demonstrated by site-directed mutagenesis studies and evaluated by computer-aided molecular modeling. Both compounds were able to suppress hormone-dependent proliferation of MCF-7aro cells in a dose-dependent manner. These findings are important for the elucidation of a structure-activity relationship on aromatase, which may help in the development of new AIs.     

Molecular basis for the aromatization reaction and exemestane-mediated irreversible inhibition of human aromatase

Aromatase converts androgens to aromatic estrogens. Aromatase inhibitors have been used as first-line drugs in the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Structural basis of the aromatization reaction and drug recognition by aromatase has remained elusive because of its unknown three-dimensional structure. In this study, recombinant human aromatase was expressed and purified from Escherichia coli. Using this purified and active preparation, the three-dimensional folding of aromatase was revealed by proteomic analysis. Combined with site-directed mutagenesis, several critical residues involved in enzyme catalysis and suicide inhibition by exemestane were evaluated. Based on our results, a new clamping mechanism of substrate/exemestane binding to the active site is proposed. These structure-function studies of aromatase would provide useful information to design more effective aromatase inhibitors for the prevention and the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer.     

Role of aromatase and androgen receptor expression in gonadal sex differentiation of ZW/ZZ-type frogs,Rana rugosa

To elucidate the mechanisms of amphibian gonadal sex differentiation, we examined the expression of aromatase and androgen receptor (AR) mRNAs for days 17-31 after fertilization. The effects of inhibitors and sex steroid hormones were also examined. In ZZ males, expression of AR decreased after day 19, while aromatase expression was low throughout the sampling period. Males treated with 17beta-estradiol (E2) showed increasing aromatase expression after day 21, and formed ovaries. AR antagonist treatment also induced high-level aromatase expression and ovarian differentiation. In males co-treated with an aromatase inhibitor and E2, the undifferentiated gonads developed into testes despite high-level aromatase expression. Males treated with androgen and E2 before and during an estrogen sensitive period, respectively, also formed testes. In ZW females, AR expression persisted at a low-level, while aromatase expression increased after day 18. Short-term treatment with an aromatase inhibitor was ineffective in preventing ovarian differentiation, whereas long-term treatment resulted in testes developing from ovarian structure. Compared with the ZZ males and ZW females, WW females did not exhibit detectable expression of AR, suggesting that the active AR gene(s) itself, or a putative gene regulating AR gene expression, is located on Z chromosomes. From the time lag of aromatase expression between ZW females and ZZ males treated with E2 and the effect of AR antagonist, it was found that in males elevated AR expression suppresses aromatase expression directly or indirectly. Consequently, endogenous androgens, accumulated by blocking estrogen biosynthesis, induced testicular differentiation. The gonadogenesis of males is dependent on sex hormone, whereas that of females has evolved to hormone-independence.     

New 7,8-benzoflavanones as potent aromatase inhibitors: synthesis and biological evaluation

Some natural compounds such as flavonoids are known to possess a moderate inhibitory activity against aromatase, this enzyme being an interesting target for hormone-dependent breast cancer treatment. It has been demonstrated that the modulation of flavonoid skeleton could increase anti-aromatase effect. Therefore, new 7,8-benzoflavanones were synthesized and tested for their activity toward aromatase inhibition. It was observed that the introduction of a benzo ring at position C-7 and C-8 on flavanone skeleton led to new potent aromatase inhibitors, the resulting 7,8-benzoflavanones being until nine times more potent than aminogluthetimide (the first aromatase inhibitor used clinically).     

The effects of dietary phytoestrogens on aromatase activity in human endometrial stromal cells

Dietary phytoestrogens have been reported to inhibit aromatase activity in placental microsomes, but the effects in the human endometrium are unknown. Aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the conversion of androgens to estrogens, has recently been shown to be expressed in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and is thought to play a role in the pathophysiology of this disease. Therefore, the objective of this study was to screen dietary phytoestrogens for their ability to inhibit aromatase activity in human endometrial stromal cells (ESC) and identify potential novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of endometriosis. The inhibition of aromatase activity by direct interaction with the dietary phytoestrogens genistein, daidzein, chrysin, and naringenin was tested in a cell free assay. Furthermore, test compound effects on aromatase activity in ESC cultures were also examined. Genistein and daidzein were inactive in the human recombinant aromatase assay whereas naringenin and chrysin inhibited aromatase activity. However, genistein (1 nM to 1 mM) stimulated aromatase activity in ESC whereas other phytoestrogens had no effect. Immunopositive aromatase cells were demonstrated in genistein-treated ESC but not in untreated control cultures. Taken together, our data suggest that genistein can increase aromatase activity in ESC likely via increased enzyme expression.     

Postmenopausal estrogen synthesis and metabolism: alterations caused by aromatase inhibitors used for the treatment of breast cancer

Inhibition of postmenopausal estrogen production by aromatase inhibitors is an established drug treatment modality for postmenopausal breast cancer. In this article postmenopausal estrogen disposition and the alterations caused by treatment with aromatase inhibitors are reviewed. Recent investigations have challenged the hypothesis that aromatization of androstenedione into estrone is the sole production pathway for estrogens in postmenopausal women. The finding that estrogens persist in the plasma of patients receiving aminoglutethimide treatment despite a near total inhibition of the aromatase enzyme suggests that alternative pathways for estrogen synthesis exist. While nonspecific actions of aromatase inhibitors may be disadvantageous, certain effects may also be beneficial. Recent findings that aminoglutethimide may induce estrone sulfate metabolism questions whether this "prototype" aromatase inhibitor might have a dual mechanism of action. The importance of investigating the possible influence of different aromatase inhibitors on all components of estrogen disposition is considered.     

Aromatase inhibition by 15-deoxy-prostaglandin J(2) (15-dPGJ(2)) and N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-retinamide (4HPR) is associated with enhanced ceramide production

Inhibition of aromatase activity is an established endocrine therapy in the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Recent studies on aromatase inhibition by the synthetic retinoid 4HPR, also known as fenretinide, and the PPARgamma agonist 15-dPGJ(2) have implicated a direct receptor-independent, redox-sensitive mechanism of action. The signalling molecule ceramide has also been previously implicated as a negative regulator of aromatase activity. In the present study, we have investigated a potential mediatory role for this sphingolipid during aromatase inhibition by fenretinide and 15-dPGJ(2) in the breast cancer cell line MDA MB 231 and JEG-3 choriocarcinoma cells. 4HPR and 15-dPGJ(2) caused a dose-dependent inhibition of aromatase activity associated with an increase in ceramide production. Both these actions were redox-sensitive as demonstrated by their abrogation in the presence of the anti-oxidant N-acetylcysteine. Exogenous ceramide analogue mimicked these inhibitory actions on aromatase, but in a redox-independent manner. Blockade of the de novo ceramide production pathway by fumonisin B(1) or myriocin inhibited the ceramide responses, but did not prevent aromatase inhibition by 15-dPGJ(2) or 4HPR. This study highlights a potential role for aromatase inhibition and the stress-response signal ceramide during the therapeutic actions of 15-dPGJ(2) and 4HPR in breast cancer treatment. However, these data do not support a mediatory role for this sphingolipid during aromatase inhibition by these agents.     

What do we know about the mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance?

Clinical trials have demonstrated the importance of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in the effective treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancers. Yet, as with all prolonged drug therapy, resistance to aromatase inhibitors does develop. To date, the precise mechanism responsible for resistance to aromatase inhibitors is not completely understood. In this paper, several mechanisms of de novo/intrinsic resistance and acquired resistance to AIs are discussed. These mechanisms are hypothesized based on important findings from a number of laboratories.

To better understand this question, our lab has generated, in vitro, breast cancer cell lines that are resistant to aromatase inhibitors. Resistant cell lines were generated over a prolonged period of time using the MCF-7aro (aromatase overexpressed) breast cancer line. These cell lines are resistant to the aromatase inhibitors letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane and the anti-estrogen tamoxifen, for comparison. Two types of resistant cell lines have been generated, those that grow in the presence of testosterone (T) which is needed for cell growth, and resistant lines that are cultured in the presence of inhibitor only (no T). In addition to functional characterization of aromatase and ER in these resistant cell lines, microarray analysis has been employed in order to determine differential gene expression within the aromatase inhibitor resistant cell lines versus tamoxifen, in order to better understand the mechanism responsible for AI resistance on a genome-wide scale. We anticipate that our studies will generate important information on the mechanisms of AI resistance. Such information can be valuable for the development of treatment strategies against AI-resistant breast cancers.     

Aromatase inhibition by R 83 842, the dextro isomer of R 76 713, in JEG-3 choriocarcinoma grown in ovariectomized nude mice

The effects of repeated (5 days) dosing with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor R 83 842 (the dextro isomer of R 76 713) on tumor aromatase and uterus weight in ovariectomized nude mice bearing JEG-3 tumors were examined. In animals bearing an androstenedione implant the presence of a JEG-3 tumor significantly increased uterus weight, proving that tumor aromatase indeed converted androgens to estrogens. Oral administration of R 76 713 (10 mg/kg) for 5 days reduced the increase in uterus weight by 84% in tumor bearing mice revealing true in vivo aromatase inhibition by R 76 713.

Experiments performed in the absence of exogenously added androgens gave similar results. Uterus weights in tumor bearing mice were significantly higher than in control mice. Oral administration of R 83 842 (5 mg/kg) for 5 days reduced uterus weight in the tumor bearing animals. Ex vivo aromatase measurements performed in JEG-3 tumors from these animals showed an aromatase inhibition of 93.9% in treated mice as compared to untreated mice. Five days oral treatment with R 83 842 dose-dependently lowered both aromatase activity and uterus weight. Doses of 5 and 0.5 mg/kg inhibited tumor aromatase by 94.1 and 74.7%, respectively, and reduced uterus weight. After a dose of 0.05 mg/kg aromatase activity and uterus weight were similar to those in the control group.     

A quantitative and interspecific test for biological activity of anti-müllerian hormone: the fetal ovary aromatase assay.

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), also known as Müllerian-inhibiting substance or factor, has previously been shown to sex-reverse the steroidogenic pattern of fetal mammalian ovaries through repression of aromatase biosynthesis. Study of the ontogeny of the response of cyclic AMP-stimulated aromatase activity of rat fetal ovaries to AMH has allowed us to develop a quantitative bioassay for the hormone. Linear responses as a function of the logarithm of AMH concentration were observed over ranges of 0.2-7.5 micrograms/ml for the bovine protein and 0.15-2 micrograms/ml for the human protein, with a maximal decrease in aromatase activity of 90% for both proteins. Under the same in vitro conditions, AMH treatment did not affect cyclic AMP-stimulated fetal rat testicular aromatase activity. Partially purified chick AMH also decreased rat ovarian aromatase activity, allowing us to use this test to study AMH ontogeny in chick gonads. Analysis of the species specificity of AMH repression of ovarian aromatase activity indicated that turtle and rat fetal ovaries responded to AMH of other vertebrate classes, whereas aromatase activity of chick embryo ovaries could be repressed only by the homospecific hormone.     

A summary of second-line randomized studies of aromatase inhibitors

The new generation of selective aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) offer a significant efficacy and safety advantage over both older agents in this class (aminoglutethimide) and the progestins (megestrol acetate (MA)), as second-line treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-dependent breast cancer who have failed on tamoxifen therapy. Exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to have activity after failure with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole, and could be used as third-line treatment. Although the newer aromatase inhibitors belong to the same class and appear, from indirect comparisons, to have similar efficacy compared with the older therapies, they have different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, suggesting the potential for clinical differences. Compared with exemestane and letrozole, anastrozole shows greater selectivity for aromatase, as it lacks any evidence of an effect on adrenal steroidogenesis and has no androgenic effects. Therefore, it is clear that these agents should not be considered to be similar in all respects. In summary, the introduction of the aromatase inhibitors represents a significant step forward in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Studies in the adjuvant setting will ultimately determine whether the differences in pharmacokinetics and phamacodynamics will be of clinical relevance.     

Inhibition of ovarian aromatase by prolactin in vivo

Ovarian aromatase activity was inhibited by prolactin treatment in both cycling rats and immature gonadotropin-primed animals. Cycling rats were injected s.c. with prolactin (4 mg/kg BW) beginning on diestrus 1. Aromatase activity in the largest follicles on diestrus 2 and on proestrus was reduced relative to controls. None of the prolactin-treated animals had ovulated when examined on the expected estrus morning. In other experiments, the immature pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin (PMSG)-primed rat was used as a model for the cycling rat. Microsomal aromatase activity but not the activity of the C17-21 lyase was reduced in ovaries of animals injected with prolactin [6 IU (200 micrograms)/rat] 48 h after PMSG administration and sacrificed 4 h later. Furthermore, aromatase activity was significantly increased when endogenous prolactin was inhibited by bromocryptine (CB-154). The effect of LH treatment, on the other hand, was to increase both aromatase and lyase activities. However, prolactin pretreatment did not consistently prevent the LH-induced increase in aromatase activity. The results suggest that inhibition of ovulation by prolactin is mediated, at least in part, by direct inhibition of aromatase activity.