Repair of x-ray-induced single strand breaks in toluenized Escherichia coli cells.

We have used sedimentation in alkali to estimate the repair of X-ray-induced single strand breaks in the DNA of irradiated toluenized Escherichia coli cells. Extensive repair requires no exogenous cofactors except ATP although other individual NTPs (except U) or dNTPs can substitute for ATP. There is no repair in polA or resA cells and since nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) inhibits repair in wild type cells we interpret the results as indicating that both ligase and polymerase I are needed for repair but that the amount of any gap filling is small and extensive repair replication is not necessary.     

Replication of T4 DNA in Escherichia coli Treated with Toluene

Deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates are incorporated into T4 DNA in infected cells treated with toluene. Under the proper conditions the incorporation is controlled by the known T4 DNA polymerase and proceeds by a semiconservative mechanism. Both strands of the phage DNA are replicated into a high molecular weight progeny molecule. The replication system is accessible to extracellular pancreatic DNase added to the reaction mixture. At early times after infection a second replication system, not under control of the gene 43 polymerase, has been detected which synthesizes T4 DNA in toluenized cells.     

Repair response of Escherichia coli to hydrogen peroxide DNA damage.

The repair response of Escherichia coli to hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage was investigated in intact and toluene-treated cells. Cellular DNA was cleaved after treatment by hydrogen peroxide as analyzed by alkaline sucrose sedimentation. The incision step did not require ATP or magnesium and was not inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). An ATP-independent, magnesium-dependent incorporation of nucleotides was seen after the exposure of cells to hydrogen peroxide. This DNA repair synthesis was not inhibited by the addition of NEM or dithiothreitol. In dnaB(Ts) strain CRT266, which is thermolabile for DNA replication, normal levels of DNA synthesis were found at the restrictive temperature (43 degrees C), showing that DNA replication was not necessary for this DNA synthesis. Density gradient analysis also indicated that hydrogen peroxide inhibited DNA replication and stimulated repair synthesis. The subsequent reformation step required magnesium, did not require ATP, and was not inhibited by NEM, in agreement with the synthesis requirements. This suggests that DNA polymerase I was involved in the repair step. Furthermore, a strain defective in DNA polymerase I was unable to reform its DNA after peroxide treatment. Chemical cleavage of the DNA was shown by incision of supercoiled DNA with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a low concentration of ferric chloride. These findings suggest that hydrogen peroxide directly incises DNA, causing damage which is repaired by an incision repair pathway that requires DNA polymerase I.     

ATP-independent, DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase II in toluenized Bacillus subtilis

Phleomycin stimulates ATP-independent DNA repair synthesis by polymerase II in toluenized $\text{B. subtilis}$ cells. In the presence of ATP it also increases the synthesis, with BrdUTP, of DNA with a density between that of normal DNA and hybrid DNA, and it enhances replicative DNA synthesis by polymerase III.     

Properties of a Bacillus subtilis strain lacking DNA polymerase I

We have isolated a mutant of Bacillussubtilis deficient in DNA polymerase I, denominated polA42, which shows a reduced ability to repair the damage to DNA by UV radiation, MMS and mitomycin C;the ability to perform recombination is not appreciably impaired.DEAE cellulose chromatography allows the separation of polymerases I and II from the parental strain;a simple procedure is also described which allows to separate rapidly the polymerases II and III of the mutant strain. The three separated polymerases have similar catalytic properties but they can be distinguished for their sensitivity to inhibitors: PCMB inhibits polymerases II and III but not polymerase I; HPUra inhibits only polymerase III. All three enzymes are unaffected by nalidixate. The DNA synthesis occurring in cells of the polA42 strain permeabilized with toluene is inhibited by nalidixate, whereas the synthesis occurring in polA⁺ toluenized cells is unaffected by the drug. The polA gene has been mapped by transduction and localized between the phe₁₂ and argA₃ genes.     

Mismatch repair causes the dynamic release of an essential DNA polymerase from the replication fork

Mismatch repair (MMR) corrects DNA polymerase errors occurring during genome replication. MMR is critical for genome maintenance, and its loss increases mutation rates several hundred fold. Recent work has shown that the interaction between the mismatch recognition protein MutS and the replication processivity clamp is important for MMR in Bacillus subtilis. To further understand how MMR is coupled to DNA replication, we examined the subcellular localization of MMR and DNA replication proteins fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) in live cells, following an increase in DNA replication errors. We demonstrate that foci of the essential DNA polymerase DnaE-GFP decrease following mismatch incorporation and that loss of DnaE-GFP foci requires MutS. Furthermore, we show that MutS and MutL bind DnaE in vitro, suggesting that DnaE is coupled to repair. We also found that DnaE-GFP foci decrease in vivo following a DNA damage-independent arrest of DNA synthesis showing that loss of DnaE-GFP foci is caused by perturbations to DNA replication. We propose that MutS directly contacts the DNA replication machinery, causing a dynamic change in the organization of DnaE at the replication fork during MMR. Our results establish a striking and intimate connection between MMR and the replicating DNA polymerase complex in vivo.     

Reconstitution of proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent repair of apurinic/apyrimidinic sites with purified human proteins

An apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site is one of the most abundant lesions spontaneously generated in living cells and is also a reaction intermediate in base excision repair. In higher eukaryotes, there are two alternative pathways for base excision repair: a DNA polymerase beta-dependent pathway and a proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-dependent pathway. Here we have reconstituted PCNA-dependent repair of AP sites with six purified human proteins: AP endonuclease, replication factor C, PCNA, flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), DNA polymerase delta, and DNA ligase I. The length of nucleotides replaced during the repair reaction (patch size) was predominantly two nucleotides, although longer patches of up to seven nucleotides could be detected. Neither replication protein A nor Ku70/80 enhanced the repair activity in this system. Disruption of the PCNA-binding site of either FEN1 or DNA ligase I significantly reduced efficiency of AP site repair but did not affect repair patch size.     

The C-terminal Domain (CTD) of Human DNA Glycosylase NEIL1 Is Required for Forming BERosome Repair Complex with DNA Replication Proteins at the Replicating Genome: DOMINANT NEGATIVE FUNCTION OF THE CTD*

The human DNA glycosylase NEIL1 was recently demonstrated to initiate prereplicative base excision repair (BER) of oxidized bases in the replicating genome, thus preventing mutagenic replication. A significant fraction of NEIL1 in cells is present in large cellular complexes containing DNA replication and other repair proteins, as shown by gel filtration. However, how the interaction of NEIL1 affects its recruitment to the replication site for prereplicative repair was not investigated. Here, we show that NEIL1 binarily interacts with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen clamp loader replication factor C, DNA polymerase δ, and DNA ligase I in the absence of DNA via its non-conserved C-terminal domain (CTD); replication factor C interaction results in ∼8-fold stimulation of NEIL1 activity. Disruption of NEIL1 interactions within the BERosome complex, as observed for a NEIL1 deletion mutant (N311) lacking the CTD, not only inhibits complete BER in vitro but also prevents its chromatin association and reduced recruitment at replication foci in S phase cells. This suggests that the interaction of NEIL1 with replication and other BER proteins is required for efficient repair of the replicating genome. Consistently, the CTD polypeptide acts as a dominant negative inhibitor during in vitro repair, and its ectopic expression sensitizes human cells to reactive oxygen species. We conclude that multiple interactions among BER proteins lead to large complexes, which are critical for efficient BER in mammalian cells, and the CTD interaction could be targeted for enhancing drug/radiation sensitivity of tumor cells.     

DNA polymerase I is required for premeiotic DNA replication and sporulation but not for X-ray repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We have used a set of seven temperature-sensitive mutants in the DNA polymerase I gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to investigate the role of DNA polymerase I in various aspects of DNA synthesis in vivo. Previously, we showed that DNA polymerase I is required for mitotic DNA replication. Here we extend our studies to several stages of meiosis and repair of X-ray-induced damage. We find that sporulation is blocked in all of the DNA polymerase temperature-sensitive mutants and that premeiotic DNA replication does not occur. Commitment to meiotic recombination is only 2% of wild-type levels. Thus, DNA polymerase I is essential for these steps. However, repair of X-ray-induced single-strand breaks is not defective in the DNA polymerase temperature-sensitive mutants, and DNA polymerase I is therefore not essential for repair of such lesions. These results suggest that DNA polymerase II or III or both, the two other nuclear yeast DNA polymerases for which roles have not yet been established, carry out repair in the absence of DNA polymerase I, but that DNA polymerase II and III cannot compensate for loss of DNA polymerase I in meiotic replication and recombination. These results do not, however, rule out essential roles for DNA polymerase II or III or both in addition to that for DNA polymerase I.     

Ficellomycin and feldamycin; inhibitors of bacterial semiconservative DNA replication.

The two peptide-like antibiotics ficellomycin and feldamycin impair semiconservative DNA replication but not DNA repair synthesis in bacteria. Specifically both antibiotics cause the accumulation of a 34S DNA species in toluenized Escherichia coli cells which lacks the capability of being integrated into larger DNA pieces and eventually the complete bacterial chromosome. Novobiocin, a known inhibitor of replicative DNA synthesis, was investigated for comparative purposes. The action of this latter antibiotic differs from the ones exerted by ficellomycin and feldamycin in the novobiocin appears to block an event associated with the initiation of Okazaki fragments. The fact that novobiocin impairs DNA gyrase suggests that this enzyme plays an essential role during the initiation of Okazaki pieces.     

Induction of DNA ligase I by 1-beta-D-arabinosylcytosine and aphidicolin in MiaPaCa human pancreatic cancer cells

Exposure of MiaPaCa cells to 1-beta-D-arabinosylcytosine (ara-C) resulted in an increase in DNA ligase levels up to threefold compared to that in the untreated control cells, despite significant growth inhibition. Increased levels of DNA ligase I protein appear to correlate with the appearance of increased mRNA levels. The [(3)H]thymidine incorporation experiment and the biochemical assay of total polymerase activity revealed that an increase in DNA ligase I levels after treatment with ara-C was not accompanied by an increase of DNA synthesis or an increased presence of DNA polymerase activity inside cells. When cells resumed DNA synthesis after drug treatment, DNA ligase I levels began to drop, indicating that increased DNA ligase I is not required for DNA synthesis. An increase in DNA ligase I was also observed in cells treated with aphidicolin, another inhibitor of DNA synthesis that inhibits DNA polymerases without incorporating itself into DNA, indicating that an increase in DNA ligase I levels could be caused by the arrest of DNA replication by these agents. Interestingly, caffeine, which is a well-known inhibitor of DNA damage checkpoint kinases, abrogated the increase in DNA ligase I in MiaPaCa cells treated with ara-C and aphidicolin, suggesting that caffeine-sensitive kinases might be important mediators in the pathway leading to the increase in DNA ligase I levels in response to anticancer drugs, including ara-C and aphidicolin. We propose that ara-C and aphidicolin induce damage to the DNA strand by arresting DNA replication forks and subsequently increase DNA ligase I levels to facilitate repair of DNA damage.     

Human DNA polymerase epsilon is expressed during cell proliferation in a manner characteristic of replicative DNA polymerases.

In order to shed light on the role of mammalian DNA polymerase epsilon we studied the expression of mRNA for the human enzyme during cell proliferation and during the cell cycle. Steady-state levels of mRNA encoding DNA polymerase epsilon were elevated dramatically when quiescent (G0) cells were stimulated to proliferate (G1/S) in a similar manner to those of DNA polymerase alpha. Message levels of DNA polymerase beta were unchanged in similar experiments. The concentration of immunoreactive DNA polymerase epsilon was also much higher in extracts from proliferating tissues than in those from non-proliferating or slowly proliferating tissues. The level of DNA polymerase epsilon mRNA in actively cycling cells synchronized with nocodazole and in cells fractionated by counterflow centrifugal elutriation showed weaker variation, being at its highest at the G1/S stage boundary. The results presented strongly suggest that mammalian DNA polymerase epsilon is involved in the replication of chromosomal DNA and/or in a repair process that may be substantially activated during the replication of chromosomal DNA. A hypothetical role for DNA polymerase epsilon in a repair process coupled to replication is discussed.     

Epstein-Barr virus BPLF1 deubiquitinates PCNA and attenuates polymerase η recruitment to DNA damage sites

PCNA is monoubiquitinated in response to DNA damage and fork stalling and then initiates recruitment of specialized polymerases in the DNA damage tolerance pathway, translesion synthesis (TLS). Since PCNA is reported to associate with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA during its replication, we investigated whether the EBV deubiquitinating (DUB) enzyme encoded by BPLF1 targets ubiquitinated PCNA and disrupts TLS. An N-terminal BPLF1 fragment (a BPLF1 construct containing the first 246 amino acids [BPLF1 1-246]) associated with PCNA and attenuated its ubiquitination in response to fork-stalling agents UV and hydroxyurea in cultured cells. Moreover, monoubiquitinated PCNA was deubiquitinated after incubation with purified BPLF1 1-246 in vitro. BPLF1 1-246 dysregulated TLS by reducing recruitment of the specialized repair polymerase polymerase η (Polη) to the detergent-resistant chromatin compartment and virtually abolished localization of Polη to nuclear repair foci, both hallmarks of TLS. Expression of BPLF1 1-246 decreased viability of UV-treated cells and led to cell death, presumably through deubiquitination of PCNA and the inability to repair damaged DNA. Importantly, deubiquitination of PCNA could be detected endogenously in EBV-infected cells in comparison with samples expressing short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against BPLF1. Further, the specificity of the interaction between BPLF1 and PCNA was dependent upon a PCNA-interacting peptide (PIP) domain within the N-terminal region of BPLF1. Both DUB activity and PIP sequence are conserved in the members of the family Herpesviridae. Thus, deubiquitination of PCNA, normally deubiquitinated by cellular USP1, by the viral DUB can disrupt repair of DNA damage by compromising recruitment of TLS polymerase to stalled replication forks. PCNA is the first cellular target identified for BPLF1 and its deubiquitinating activity.     

DNA polymerase III requirement for repair of DNA damage caused by methyl methanesulfonate and hydrogen peroxide.

The pcbA1 mutation allows DNA replication dependent on DNA polymerase I at the restrictive temperature in polC(Ts) strains. Cells which carry pcbA1, a functional DNA polymerase I, and a temperature-sensitive DNA polymerase III gene were used to study the role of DNA polymerase III in DNA repair. At the restrictive temperature for DNA polymerase III, these strains were more sensitive to the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and hydrogen peroxide than normal cells. The same strains showed no increase in sensitivity to bleomycin, UV light, or psoralen at the restrictive temperature. The sensitivity of these strains to MMS and hydrogen peroxide was not due to the pcbAl allele, and normal sensitivity was restored by the introduction of a chromosomal or cloned DNA polymerase III gene, verifying that the sensitivity was due to loss of DNA polymerase III alpha-subunit activity. A functional DNA polymerase III is required for the reformation of high-molecular-weight DNA after treatment of cells with MMS or hydrogen peroxide, as demonstrated by alkaline sucrose sedimentation results. Thus, it appears that a functional DNA polymerase III is required for the optimal repair of DNA damage by MMS or hydrogen peroxide.     

Late induction of human DNA ligase I after UV-C irradiation.

We have studied the regulation of DNA ligase I gene expression in UV-C irradiated human primary fibroblasts. An increase of approximately 6-fold both in DNA ligase I messenger and activity levels was observed 24 h after UV treatment, when nucleotide excision repair (NER) is no longer operating. DNA ligase I induction is serum-independent and is controlled mainly by the steady-state level of its mRNA. The activation is a function of the UV dose and occurs at lower doses in cells showing UV hypersensitivity. No increase in replicative DNA polymerase alpha activity was found, indicating that UV induction of DNA ligase I occurs through a pathway that differs from the one causing activation of the replication machinery. These data suggest that DNA ligase I induction could be linked to the repair of DNA damage not removed by NER.     

Dinucleotide repeat expansion catalyzed by bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase in vitro

DNA replication normally occurs with high fidelity, but certain "slippery" regions of DNA with tracts of mono-, di-, and trinucleotide repeats are frequently mutation hot spots. We have developed an in vitro assay to study the mechanism of dinucleotide repeat expansion. The primer-template resembles a base excision repair substrate with a single nucleotide gap centered opposite a tract of nine CA repeats; nonrepeat sequences flank the dinucleotide repeats. DNA polymerases are expected to repair the gap, but further extension is possible if the DNA polymerase can displace the downstream oligonucleotide. We report here that the wild type bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase carries out gap and strand displacement replication and also catalyzes a dinucleotide expansion reaction. Repeat expansion was not detected for an exonuclease-deficient T4 DNA polymerase or for Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. The dinucleotide repeat expansion reaction catalyzed by wild type T4 DNA polymerase required a downstream oligonucleotide to "stall" replication and 3' --> 5' exonuclease activity to remove the 3'-nonrepeat sequence adjacent to the repeat tract in the template strand. These results suggest that dinucleotide repeat expansion may be stimulated in vivo during DNA repair or during processing of Okazaki fragments.     

Repair of acetyl-aminofluorene modified pBR322 DNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes and eggs; effect of diadenosine tetraphosphate

Using Xenopus laevis oocytes and unfertilized eggs, we have developed a system which allows the study of DNA repair upon microinjection of pBR 322 DNA which has been previously modified in vitro by N-acetyl-aminofluorene, under controlled conditions. In unfertilized eggs, an efficient repair of pBR-18AAF DNA takes place, leading to a restoration of the transforming activity of the plasmid DNA towards Escherichia coli. The repaired DNA is even efficiently replicated, the egg being "activated" by the microinjection. In the oocyte, a partial repair is observed as shown by the incorporation of labelled dCTP in the modified plasmid DNA, even in the presence of aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase alpha. However, the repair appears to be very limited, since it does not restore the transforming activity of the modified plasmid DNA. This inefficient repair in the oocyte may be due to the rapid packaging of foreign DNA into a minichromosome and/or to a very low level of DNA polymerase beta. This system was used to study the effect of diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) on DNA repair. Ap4A seems not to interfere with repair processes in the oocyte, but significantly inhibits the replication following the repair of AAF-modified plasmid DNA in unfertilized eggs. These results suggest that Ap4A could be involved in switching off the replication machinery when DNA is badly damaged, thus helping to avoid the perpetuation of DNA modifications in the daughter cells. This hypothesis is consistent with many previous reports on the accumulation of dinucleoside polyphosphates under stress conditions, which are known to result in modification of DNA.     

Effect of specific enzyme inhibitors on replication, total genome DNA repair and on gene-specific DNA repair after UV irradiation in CHO cells.

We have studied the effect of some specific enzyme inhibitors on DNA repair and replication after UV damage in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The DNA repair was studied at the level of the average, overall genome and also in the active dihydrofolate reductase gene. Replication was measured in the overall genome. We tested inhibitors of DNA polymerase alpha and delta (aphidicolin), of poly(ADPr) polymerase (3-aminobenzamide), of ribonucleotide reductase (hydroxyurea), of topoisomerase I (camptothecin), and of topoisomerase II (merbarone, VP-16). In addition, we tested the effect of the potential topoisomerase I activator, beta-lapachone. All of these compounds inhibited genome replication and all topoisomerase inhibitors affected the overall genome repair; beta-lapachone stimulated it. None of these compounds had any effect on the gene-specific repair.     

Mammalian DNA polymerase beta can substitute for DNA polymerase I during DNA replication in Escherichia coli.

Mammalian DNA polymerase beta is the smallest known eukaryotic polymerase and is expressed as an active protein in Escherichia coli harboring a plasmid containing its cDNA. Since some catalytic functions of DNA polymerase beta and E. coli DNA polymerase I are similar, we wished to determine if DNA polymerase beta could substitute for DNA polymerase I in bacteria. We found that the expression of mammalian DNA polymerase beta in E. coli restored growth in a DNA polymerase I-defective bacterial mutant. Sucrose density gradient analysis revealed that DNA polymerase beta complements the replication defect in the mutant by increasing the rate of joining of Okazaki fragments. These findings demonstrate that DNA polymerase beta, believed to function in DNA repair in mammalian cells, can also function in DNA replication. Moreover, this complementation system will permit study of the in vivo function of altered species of DNA polymerase beta, an analysis currently precluded by the difficulty in isolating mutants in mammalian cells.     

DNA polymerase epsilon: the latest member in the family of mammalian DNA polymerases

DNA polymerase epsilon is a mammalian polymerase that has a tightly associated 3'----5' exonuclease activity. Because of this readily detectable exonuclease activity, the enzyme has been regarded as a form of DNA polymerase delta, an enzyme which, together with DNA polymerase alpha, is in all probability required for the replication of chromosomal DNA. Recently, it was discovered that DNA polymerase epsilon is both catalytically and structurally distinct from DNA polymerase delta. The most striking difference between the two DNA polymerases is that processive DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase delta is dependent on proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a replication factor, while DNA polymerase epsilon is inherently processive. DNA polymerase epsilon is required at least for the repair synthesis of UV-damaged DNA. DNA polymerases are highly conserved in eukaryotic cells. Mammalian DNA polymerases alpha, delta and epsilon are counterparts of yeast DNA polymerases I, III and II, respectively. Like DNA polymerases I and III, DNA polymerase II is also essential for the viability of cells, which suggests that DNA polymerase II (and epsilon) may play a role in DNA replication.