Charge selectivity of the Cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels

The determinants of charge selectivity of the Cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels have been studied for more than a decade. The investigations have mainly covered homomeric receptors e.g. the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7, the glycine receptor alpha1 and the serotonin receptor 5-HT(3A). Only recently, the determinants of charge selectivity of heteromeric receptors have been addressed for the GABA(A) receptor alpha2beta3gamma2. For all receptor subtypes, the selectivity determinants have been located to an intracellular linker between transmembrane domains M1 and M2. Two features of the M1-M2 linker appear to control ion selectivity. A central role for charged amino acid residues in selectivity has been almost universally observed. Furthermore, recent studies point to an important role of the size of the narrowest constriction in the pore. In the present review, these determinants of charge selectivity of the Cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels will be discussed in detail.     

Incompatibility between a pair of residues from the pre-M1 linker and Cys-loop blocks surface expression of the glycine receptor

Regulation of cell membrane excitability can be achieved either by modulating the functional properties of cell membrane-expressed single channels or by varying the number of expressed channels. Whereas the structural basis underlying single channel properties has been intensively studied, the structural basis contributing to surface expression is less well characterized. Here we demonstrate that homologous substitution of the pre-M1 linker from the β subunit prevents surface expression of the α1 glycine receptor chloride channel. By investigating a series of chimeras comprising α1 and β subunits, we hypothesized that this effect was due to incompatibility between a pair of positively charged residues, which lie in close proximity to each other in the tertiary structure, from the pre-M1 linker and Cys-loop. Abolishing either positive charge restored surface expression. We propose that incompatibility (electrostatic repulsion) between this pair of residues misfolds the glycine receptor, and in consequence, the protein is retained in the cytoplasm and prevented from surface expression by the quality control machinery. This hypothesis suggests a novel mechanism, i.e. residue incompatibility, for explaining the mutation-induced reduction in channel surface expression, often present in the cases of hereditary hyperekplexia.     

Assembly of nicotinic and other Cys-loop receptors

The Cys-loop receptor family consists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), glycine receptor, GABA-A and some other receptors. They fulfill a plethora of functions, whereas their malfunctioning is associated with many diseases. All three domains - extracellular ligand-binding, membrane and cytoplasmic - of these ligand-gated ion channels play important roles in the receptor assembly, delivery to the membrane surface and functional activity. In this study, we discuss the role of these domains in the assembly of the Cys-loop receptors, most comprehensively for the nAChRs. Heterologous expression and mutations of large N-terminal fragments of various subunits demonstrated their leading role in the assembly, although getting an isolated well-structured pentameric ligand-binding domain is still a problem. The long intracellular loop between transmembrane fragments M3 and M4 participates in modulating the receptor function and in clusterization of the receptor complexes because of interactions with the intracellular proteins. The transmembrane fragments play different functional roles: M2 fragments outline the channel, M4 fragments, the most remote from the channel, modulate the channel function and contact the lipid environment. The interactions of aromatic residues in the M1 and M3 fragments with those of M4 are important for the correct assembly of glycine receptor α1 subunit and for the formation of functional pentaoligomer. The role of the three receptor domains is discussed in the light of electron microscopy structure of the Torpedo nAChR, X-ray structures of agonist and antagonist complexes with the acetylcholine-binding proteins and the X-ray structures of the prokaryotic Cys-loop receptors.     

Ligand- and subunit-specific conformational changes in the ligand-binding domain and the TM2-TM3 linker of {alpha}1 {beta}2 {gamma}2 GABAA receptors

Cys-loop receptor ligand binding sites are located at subunit interfaces where they are lined by loops A-C from one subunit and loops D-F from the adjacent subunit. Agonist binding induces large conformational changes in loops C and F. However, it is controversial as to whether these conformational changes are essential for gating. Here we used voltage clamp fluorometry to investigate the roles of loops C and F in gating the α1 β2 γ2 GABA(A) receptor. Voltage clamp fluorometry involves labeling introduced cysteines with environmentally sensitive fluorophores and inferring structural rearrangements from ligand-induced fluorescence changes. Previous attempts to define the roles of loops C and F using this technique have focused on homomeric Cys-loop receptors. However, the problem with studying homomeric receptors is that it is difficult to eliminate the possibility of bound ligands interacting directly with attached fluorophores at the same site. Here we show that ligands binding to the β2-α1 interface GABA binding site produce conformational changes at the adjacent subunit interface. This is most likely due to agonist-induced loop C closure directly altering loop F conformation at the adjacent α1-β2 subunit interface. However, as antagonists and agonists produce identical α1 subunit loop F conformational changes, these conformational changes appear unimportant for gating. Finally, we demonstrate that TM2-TM3 loops from adjacent β2 subunits in α1 β2 receptors can dimerize via K24'C disulfides in the closed state. This result implies unexpected conformational mobility in this crucial part of the gating machinery. Together, this information provides new insights into the activation mechanisms of Cys-loop receptors.     

An ion selectivity filter in the extracellular domain of Cys-loop receptors reveals determinants for ion conductance

Neurotransmitter binding to Cys-loop receptors promotes a prodigious transmembrane flux of several million ions/s, but to date, structural determinants of ion flux have been identified flanking the membrane-spanning region. Using x-ray crystallography, sequence analysis, and single-channel recording, we identified a novel determinant of ion conductance near the point of entry of permeant ions. Co-crystallization of acetylcholine-binding protein with sulfate anions revealed coordination of SO4(2-) with a ring of lysines at a position equivalent to 24 A above the lipid membrane in homologous Cys-loop receptors. Analysis of multiple sequence alignments revealed that residues equivalent to the ring of lysines are negatively charged in cation-selective receptors but are positively charged in anion-selective receptors. Charge reversal of side chains at homologous positions in the nicotinic receptor from the motor end plate decreases unitary conductance up to 80%. Selectivity filters stemming from transmembrane alpha-helices have similar pore diameters and compositions of amino acids. These findings establish that when the channel opens under a physiological electrochemical gradient, permeant ions are initially stabilized within the extracellular vestibule of Cys-loop receptors, and this stabilization is a major determinant of ion conductance.     

Structure and activity of alpha-conotoxin PeIA at nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes and GABA(B) receptor-coupled N-type calcium channels

α-Conotoxins are peptides from cone snails that target the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). RgIA and Vc1.1 have analgesic activity in animal pain models. Both peptides target the α9α10 nAChR and inhibit N-type calcium channels via GABA(B) receptor activation, but the mechanism of action of analgesic activity is unknown. PeIA has previously been shown to inhibit the α9α10 and α3β2 nAChRs. In this study, we have determined the structure of PeIA and shown that it is also a potent inhibitor of N-type calcium channels via GABA(B) receptor activation. The characteristic α-conotoxin fold is present in PeIA, but it has a different distribution of surface-exposed hydrophobic and charged residues compared with Vc1.1. Thus, the surface residue distribution, rather than the overall fold, appears to be responsible for the 50-fold increase in selectivity at the α3β2 nAChR by PeIA relative to Vc1.1. In contrast to their difference in potency at the nAChR, the equipotent activity of PeIA and Vc1.1 at the GABA(B) receptor suggests that the GABA(B) receptor is more tolerant to changes in surface residues than is the nAChR. The conserved Asp-Pro-Arg motif of Vc1.1 and RgIA, which is crucial for potency at the α9α10 nAChR, is not required for activity at GABA(B) receptor/N-type calcium channels because PeIA has a His-Pro-Ala motif in the equivalent position. This study shows that different structure-activity relationships are associated with the targeting of the GABA(B) receptor versus nAChRs. Furthermore, there is probably a much more diverse range of conotoxins that target the GABA(B) receptor than currently realized.     

Gephyrin-mediated γ-aminobutyric acid type A and glycine receptor clustering relies on a common binding site

Gephyrin is the major protein determinant for the clustering of inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors. Earlier analyses revealed that gephyrin tightly binds to residues 398-410 of the glycine receptor β subunit (GlyR β) and, as demonstrated only recently, also interacts with GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) containing the α1, α2, and α3 subunits. Here, we dissect the molecular basis underlying the interactions between gephyrin and GABA(A)Rs containing these α-subunits and compare them to the crystal structure of the gephyrin-GlyR β complex. Biophysical and biochemical assays revealed that, in contrast to its tight interaction with GlyR β, gephyrin only loosely interacts with GABA(A)R α2, whereas it has an intermediate affinity for the GABA(A)R α1 and α3 subunits. Despite the wide variation in affinities and the low overall sequence homology among the identified receptor subunits, competition assays confirmed the receptor-gephyrin interaction to be a mutually exclusive process. Selected gephyrin point mutants that critically weaken complex formation with GlyR β also abolished the GABA(A)R α1 and α3 interactions. Additionally, we identified a common binding motif with two conserved aromatic residues that are central for gephyrin binding. Consistent with the biochemical data, mutations of the corresponding residues within the cytoplasmic domain of α2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs attenuated clustering of these receptors at postsynaptic sites in hippocampal neurons. Taken together, our experiments provide key insights regarding similarities and differences in the complex formation between gephyrin and GABA(A)Rs compared with GlyRs and, hence, the accumulation of these receptors at postsynaptic sites.     

γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A (GABAA) Receptor α Subunits Play a Direct Role in Synaptic Versus Extrasynaptic Targeting

GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)-Rs) are localized at both synaptic and extrasynaptic sites, mediating phasic and tonic inhibition, respectively. Previous studies suggest an important role of γ2 and δ subunits in synaptic versus extrasynaptic targeting of GABA(A)-Rs. Here, we demonstrate differential function of α2 and α6 subunits in guiding the localization of GABA(A)-Rs. To study the targeting of specific subtypes of GABA(A)-Rs, we used a molecularly engineered GABAergic synapse model to precisely control the GABA(A)-R subunit composition. We found that in neuron-HEK cell heterosynapses, GABAergic events mediated by α2β3γ2 receptors were very fast (rise time ～2 ms), whereas events mediated by α6β3δ receptors were very slow (rise time ～20 ms). Such an order of magnitude difference in rise time could not be attributed to the minute differences in receptor kinetics. Interestingly, synaptic events mediated by α6β3 or α6β3γ2 receptors were significantly slower than those mediated by α2β3 or α2β3γ2 receptors, suggesting a differential role of α subunit in receptor targeting. This was confirmed by differential targeting of the same δ-γ2 chimeric subunits to synaptic or extrasynaptic sites, depending on whether it was co-assembled with the α2 or α6 subunit. In addition, insertion of a gephyrin-binding site into the intracellular domain of α6 and δ subunits brought α6β3δ receptors closer to synaptic sites. Therefore, the α subunits, together with the γ2 and δ subunits, play a critical role in governing synaptic versus extrasynaptic targeting of GABA(A)-Rs, possibly through differential interactions with gephyrin.     

Discovery of a novel allosteric modulator of 5-HT3 receptors: inhibition and potentiation of Cys-loop receptor signaling through a conserved transmembrane intersubunit site

The ligand-gated ion channels in the Cys-loop receptor superfamily mediate the effects of neurotransmitters acetylcholine, serotonin, GABA, and glycine. Cys-loop receptor signaling is susceptible to modulation by ligands acting through numerous allosteric sites. Here we report the discovery of a novel class of negative allosteric modulators of the 5-HT(3) receptors (5-HT(3)Rs). PU02 (6-[(1-naphthylmethyl)thio]-9H-purine) is a potent and selective antagonist displaying IC(50) values of ~1 μM at 5-HT(3)Rs and substantially lower activities at other Cys-loop receptors. In an elaborate mutagenesis study of the 5-HT(3)A receptor guided by a homology model, PU02 is demonstrated to act through a transmembrane intersubunit site situated in the upper three helical turns of TM2 and TM3 in the (+)-subunit and TM1 and TM2 in the (-)-subunit. The Ser(248), Leu(288), Ile(290), Thr(294), and Gly(306) residues are identified as important molecular determinants of PU02 activity with minor contributions from Ser(292) and Val(310), and we propose that the naphthalene group of PU02 docks into the hydrophobic cavity formed by these. Interestingly, specific mutations of Ser(248), Thr(294), and Gly(306) convert PU02 into a complex modulator, potentiating and inhibiting 5-HT-evoked signaling through these mutants at low and high concentrations, respectively. The PU02 binding site in the 5-HT(3)R corresponds to allosteric sites in anionic Cys-loop receptors, which emphasizes the uniform nature of the molecular events underlying signaling through the receptors. Moreover, the dramatic changes in the functional properties of PU02 induced by subtle changes in its binding site bear witness to the delicate structural discrimination between allosteric inhibition and potentiation of Cys-loop receptors.     

Structural characterization and agonist binding to human α4β2 nicotinic receptors

The Cys-loop receptor super-family of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels mediates fast synaptic transmission throughout the human nervous system. These receptors exhibit widely varying pharmacologies, yet their structural characterization has relied heavily on their homology with the naturally abundant muscle-type Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Here we examine for the first time the structure of a human α4β2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. We show that human α4β2 nicotinic receptors adopt a secondary/tertiary fold similar to that of the Torpedo nicotinic receptor with a large proportion of both α-helix and β-sheet, but exhibit a substantially increased thermal stability. Both receptors bind agonist, but with different patterns of agonist recognition – particularly in the nature of the interactions between aromatic residues and the agonist quaternary amine functional group. By comparing α4β2 and Torpedo receptors, we begin to delineate their structural similarities and differences.     

Stoichiometry and Subunit Arrangement of α1β Glycine Receptors As Determined by Atomic Force Microscopy

The glycine receptor is an anion-permeable member of the Cys-loop ion channel receptor family. Synaptic glycine receptors predominantly comprise pentameric α1β subunit heteromers. To date, attempts to define the subunit stoichiometry and arrangement of these receptors have not yielded consistent results. Here we introduced FLAG and six-His epitopes into α1 and β subunits, respectively, and imaged single antibody-bound α1β receptors using atomic force microscopy. This permitted us to infer the number and relative locations of the respective subunits in functional pentamers. Our results indicate an invariant 2α1:3β stoichiometry with a β-α-β-α-β subunit arrangement.     

GABRB3 mutation, G32R, associated with childhood absence epilepsy alters α1β3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor expression and channel gating

A GABA(A) receptor β3 subunit mutation, G32R, has been associated with childhood absence epilepsy. We evaluated the possibility that this mutation, which is located adjacent to the most N-terminal of three β3 subunit N-glycosylation sites, might reduce GABAergic inhibition by increasing glycosylation of β3 subunits. The mutation had three major effects on GABA(A) receptors. First, coexpression of β3(G32R) subunits with α1 or α3 and γ2L subunits in HEK293T cells reduced surface expression of γ2L subunits and increased surface expression of β3 subunits, suggesting a partial shift from ternary αβ3γ2L receptors to binary αβ3 and homomeric β3 receptors. Second, β3(G32R) subunits were more likely than β3 subunits to be N-glycosylated at Asn-33, but increases in glycosylation were not responsible for changes in subunit surface expression. Rather, both phenomena could be attributed to the presence of a basic residue at position 32. Finally, α1β3(G32R)γ2L receptors had significantly reduced macroscopic current density. This reduction could not be explained fully by changes in subunit expression levels (because γ2L levels decreased only slightly) or glycosylation (because reduction persisted in the absence of glycosylation at Asn-33). Single channel recording revealed that α1β3(G32R)γ2L receptors had impaired gating with shorter mean open time. Homology modeling indicated that the mutation altered salt bridges at subunit interfaces, including regions important for subunit oligomerization. Our results suggest both a mechanism for mutation-induced hyperexcitability and a novel role for the β3 subunit N-terminal α-helix in receptor assembly and gating.     

Potency of GABA at human recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes: a mini review

GABA_A receptors are members of the ligand-gated ion channel superfamily that mediate inhibitory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. They are thought to be composed of 2 alpha (α), 2 beta (β) subunits and one other such as a gamma (γ) or delta (δ) subunit. The potency of GABA is influenced by the subunit composition. However, there are no reported systematic studies that evaluate GABA potency on a comprehensive number of subunit combinations expressed in Xenopus oocytes, despite the wide use of this heterologous expression system in structure–function studies and drug discovery. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic characterization of the potency of GABA at 43 human recombinant GABA_A receptor combinations expressed in Xenopus oocytes using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique. The results show that the α-subunits and to a lesser extent, the β-subunits influence GABA potency. Of the binary and ternary combinations with and without the γ2L subunit, the α6/γ2L-containing receptors were the most sensitive to GABA, while the β2- or β3-subunit conferred higher sensitivity to GABA than receptors containing the β1-subunit with the exception of the α2β1γ2L and α6β1γ2L subtypes. Of the δ-subunit containing GABA_A receptors, α4/δ-containing GABA_A receptors displayed highest GABA sensitivity, with mid-nanomolar concentrations activating α4β1δ and α4β3δ receptors. At α4β2δ, GABA had low micromolar activity.     

Molecular determinants of ivermectin sensitivity at the glycine receptor chloride channel

Ivermectin is an anthelmintic drug that works by activating glutamate-gated chloride channel receptors (GluClRs) in nematode parasites. GluClRs belong to the Cys-loop receptor family that also includes glycine receptor (GlyR) chloride channels. GluClRs and A288G mutant GlyRs are both activated by low nanomolar ivermectin concentrations. The crystal structure of the Caenorhabditis elegans α GluClR complexed with ivermectin has recently been published. Here, we probed ivermectin sensitivity determinants on the α1 GlyR using site-directed mutagenesis and electrophysiology. Based on a mutagenesis screen of transmembrane residues, we identified Ala288 and Pro230 as crucial sensitivity determinants. A comparison of the actions of selamectin and ivermectin suggested the benzofuran C05-OH was required for high efficacy. When taken together with docking simulations, these results supported a GlyR ivermectin binding orientation similar to that seen in the GluClR crystal structure. However, whereas the crystal structure shows that ivermectin interacts with the α GluClR via H-bonds with Leu218, Ser260, and Thr285 (α GluClR numbering), our data indicate that H-bonds with residues homologous to Ser260 and Thr285 are not important for high ivermectin sensitivity or direct agonist efficacy in A288G α1 GlyRs or three other GluClRs. Our data also suggest that van der Waals interactions between the ivermectin disaccharide and GlyR M2-M3 loop residues are unimportant for high ivermectin sensitivity. Thus, although our results corroborate the ivermectin binding orientation as revealed by the crystal structure, they demonstrate that some of the binding interactions revealed by this structure do not pertain to other highly ivermectin-sensitive Cys-loop receptors.     

Azemiopsin from Azemiops feae viper venom, a novel polypeptide ligand of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Azemiopsin, a novel polypeptide, was isolated from the Azemiops feae viper venom by combination of gel filtration and reverse-phase HPLC. Its amino acid sequence (DNWWPKPPHQGPRPPRPRPKP) was determined by means of Edman degradation and mass spectrometry. It consists of 21 residues and, unlike similar venom isolates, does not contain cysteine residues. According to circular dichroism measurements, this peptide adopts a β-structure. Peptide synthesis was used to verify the determined sequence and to prepare peptide in sufficient amounts to study its biological activity. Azemiopsin efficiently competed with α-bungarotoxin for binding to Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) (IC(50) 0.18 ± 0.03 μm) and with lower efficiency to human α7 nAChR (IC(50) 22 ± 2 μm). It dose-dependently blocked acetylcholine-induced currents in Xenopus oocytes heterologously expressing human muscle-type nAChR and was more potent against the adult form (α1β1εδ) than the fetal form (α1β1γδ), EC(50) being 0.44 ± 0.1 μm and 1.56 ± 0.37 μm, respectively. The peptide had no effect on GABA(A) (α1β3γ2 or α2β3γ2) receptors at a concentration up to 100 μm or on 5-HT(3) receptors at a concentration up to 10 μm. Ala scanning showed that amino acid residues at positions 3-6, 8-11, and 13-14 are essential for binding to Torpedo nAChR. In biological activity azemiopsin resembles waglerin, a disulfide-containing peptide from the Tropidechis wagleri venom, shares with it a homologous C-terminal hexapeptide, but is the first natural toxin that blocks nAChRs and does not possess disulfide bridges.     

Establishing an ion pair interaction in the homomeric rho1 gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor that contributes to the gating pathway

gamma-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors are members of the Cys-loop superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels. Upon agonist binding, the receptor undergoes a structural transition from the closed to the open state, but the mechanism of gating is not well understood. Here we utilized a combination of conventional mutagenesis and the high precision methodology of unnatural amino acid incorporation to study the gating interface of the human homopentameric rho1 GABA(A) receptor. We have identified an ion pair interaction between two conserved charged residues, Glu(92) in loop 2 of the extracellular domain and Arg(258) in the pre-M1 region. We hypothesize that the salt bridge exists in the closed state by kinetic measurements and free energy analysis. Several other charged residues at the gating interface are not critical to receptor function, supporting previous conclusions that it is the global charge pattern of the gating interface that controls receptor function in the Cys-loop superfamily.     

Mutagenic Analysis of the Intracellular Portals of the Human 5-HT3A Receptor

Structural models of Cys-loop receptors based on homology with the Torpedo marmorata nicotinic acetylcholine receptor infer the existence of cytoplasmic portals within the conduction pathway framed by helical amphipathic regions (termed membrane-associated (MA) helices) of adjacent intracellular M3-M4 loops. Consistent with these models, two arginine residues (Arg⁴³⁶ and Arg⁴⁴⁰) within the MA helix of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3A (5-HT₃A) receptors act singularly as rate-limiting determinants of single-channel conductance (γ). However, there is little conservation in primary amino acid sequences across the cytoplasmic loops of Cys-loop receptors, limiting confidence in the fidelity of this particular aspect of the 5-HT₃A receptor model. We probed the majority of residues within the MA helix of the human 5-HT₃A subunit using alanine- and arginine-scanning mutagenesis and the substituted cysteine accessibility method to determine their relative influences upon γ. Numerous residues, prominently those at the 435, 436, 439, and 440 positions, were found to markedly influence γ. This approach yielded a functional map of the 5-HT₃A receptor portals, which agrees well with the homology model.     

Trafficking of 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors (Review)

The 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors are members of the Cys-loop family of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels that also include receptors for glycine and acetylcholine. The 5-HT(3) and acetylcholine receptors (cationic ion channels) and the GABA(A) and glycine receptors (anionic ion channels) generally depolarize or hyperpolarize, respectively, the neuronal membrane. Within the amino-terminal extracellular region, all members of this family exhibit a similar architecture of ligand binding domains and a number of key residues are completely conserved. The molecular characterization of their ligand binding and gating characteristics has benefited from the existence of a large repertoire of individual subunits that contribute to the pentameric ion channel. Although differences do exist, advances in our knowledge of one member offers valuable insight into the family as a whole. Each member of the Cys-loop receptors (and all other multimeric ion channels) must face the same challenges: How to assemble individual subunits into an ion channel and which subunits to use? How are assembled receptors distinguished from those that are unassembled or misassembled, then exported from the endoplasmic reticulum and delivered to the cell surface? How are they targeted to, and anchored at synaptic and extrasynaptic sites? How and when are they to be removed from these sites to provide long-term regulation of neuronal activity? In this review, we summarize our current knowledge for the 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors that have provided complementary information and helped us build an overall picture of how receptor biogenesis and trafficking occurs.     

Gating-induced Conformational Rearrangement of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor β-α Subunit Interface in the Membrane-spanning Domain

GABA(A) receptors mediate fast inhibitory synaptic transmission. The transmembrane ion channel is lined by a ring of five α helices, M2 segments, one from each subunit. An outer ring of helices comprising the alternating M1, M3, and M4 segments from each subunit surrounds the inner ring and forms the interface with the lipid bilayer. The structural rearrangements that follow agonist binding and culminate in opening of the ion pore remain incompletely characterized. Propofol and other intravenous general anesthetics bind at the βM3-αM1 subunit interface. We sought to determine whether this region undergoes conformational changes during GABA activation. We measured the reaction rate of p-chloromercuribenzenesulfonate (pCMBS) with cysteines substituted in the GABA(A) receptor α1M1 and β2M3 segments. In the presence of GABA, the pCMBS reaction rate increased significantly in a cluster of residues in the extracellular third of the α1M1 segment facing the β2M3 segment. Mutation of the β2M2 segment 19' position, R269Q, altered the pCMBS reaction rate with several α1M1 Cys, some only in the resting state and others only in the GABA-activated state. Thus, β2R269 is charged in both states. GABA activation induced disulfide bond formation between β2R269C and α1I228C. The experiments demonstrate that α1M1 moves in relationship to β2M2R269 during gating. Thus, channel gating does not involve rigid body movements of the entire transmembrane domain. Channel gating causes changes in the relative position of transmembrane segments both within a single subunit and relative to the neighboring subunits.     

Activation of ionotropic receptors and thermodynamics of binding

The structure, thermodynamics and activation mechanism of Cys-loop ionotropic receptors such as glycine, nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-HT3-type serotonin and A-type gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors are discussed. Based on the interrelationship of receptor binding and ionophore function, a ternary displacement mechanism of binding including the activation of ionophores is outlined. This displacement model can explain the enigmatic thermodynamic discrimination of agonists versus antagonists of Cys-loop ionotropic receptors. Binding of both agonists and antagonists is exothermic while activation is endothermic driven by large increases in entropy. Closure of the binding cavities around agonists in concert with subunit rotations and/or removal of water-filled crevices between transmembrane (TM) regions can account for entropy increases. Recombinant glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors and their point mutations support the predominant role of entropy in receptor activation.