Selective mutations in estrogen receptor alpha D-domain alters nuclear translocation and non-estrogen response element gene regulatory mechanisms

The three main mechanisms of ERα action are: 1) nuclear, genomic, direct DNA binding, 2) nuclear, genomic, "tethered"-mediated, protein-protein interactions, and 3) non-nuclear, non-genomic, rapid action responses. Reports suggest the D-domain or hinge region of ERα plays an important role in mechanisms 1 and 2 above. Studies demonstrating the functionality of the ERα hinge region have resected the full D-domain; therefore, site directed mutations were made to attribute precise sequence functionality to this domain. This study focuses on the characterization and properties of three novel site directed ERα- D-domain mutants. The Hinge 1 (H1) ERα mutant has disrupted nuclear localization, can no longer perform tethered mediated responses and has lost interaction with c-Jun, but retains estrogen response element (ERE)-mediated functions as demonstrated by confocal microscopy, reporter assays, endogenous gene expression and co-immunoprecipitation. The H2 ERα mutant is non-nuclear, but translocates to the nucleus with estradiol (E2) treatment and maintains ERE-mediated functionality. The H2+NES ERα mutant does not maintain nuclear translocation with hormone binding, no longer activates ERE-target genes, functions in ERE- or tethered-mediated luciferase assays, but does retain the non-genomic, non-nuclear, rapid action response. These studies reveal the sequence(s) in the ERα hinge region that are involved in tethered-mediated actions as well as nuclear localization and attribute important functionality to this region of the receptor. In addition, the properties of these ERα mutants will allow future studies to further dissect and characterize the three main ERα mechanisms of action and determine the mechanistic role each action has in estrogen hormone regulation.     

17 beta-estradiol activates PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by estrogen receptor (ER)-dependent and ER-independent mechanisms in endometrial cancer cells

Cellular response to estrogen is mediated both by estrogen receptor (ER) binding to estrogen response element (ERE) and by non-nuclear actions like activation of signal transducing pathways. The main aims are to study if PI3K/Akt signaling pathway can be activated by 17beta-estradiol (E2) via non-nuclear action and to investigate the relationship of the action of E2 and ER in endometrial cancer cells expressing with different status of ER. The levels of phosphorylated Akt (Ser473) (P-Akt) and total Akt were examined by western blot and Akt kinase activity was measured in cells after stimulation with 1 microM E2 at different time points. Inhibitory role of LY294002 on activation of Akt induced by E2 and its estrogen antagonist, ICI182780 were also tested. P-Akt/Akt was used as a measure of activation of Akt. We found that maximum P-Akt/Akt and Akt kinase activity took place at 30 min in Ishikawa cells and 15 min in HEC-1A cells and the activation persisted for at least 2 h after stimulation with 1 microM E2. The activation of Akt elicited gradually with increasing doses of E2. PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, stopped the activating Akt in a dose-dependent manner and 50 microM LY294002 completely blocked the activation of Akt induced by E2. ICI182780 could block the activation of PI3K/Akt in ER-positive Ishikawa cells but not in HEC-1A cells with poor-expressed ER. This study demonstrated that E2 is able to promptly activate PI3K/Akt signal pathway in Ishikawa cells in an ER-dependent manner and ER-independent in HEC-1A cells. Blockage of PI3K/Akt cascade may become a potential and effective way to control endometrial carcinoma, especially in ER-negative cancers, which show no response to endocrinal therapy.     

Direct interactions with G α i and G βγ mediate nongenomic signaling by estrogen receptor α

Estrogen induces G protein-dependent nongenomic signaling in a variety of cell types via the activation of a plasma membrane-associated subpopulation of estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha). Using pull-down experiments with purified recombinant proteins, we now demonstrate that ER alpha binds directly to G alpha i and G betagamma. Mutagenesis and the addition of blocking peptide reveals that this occurs via amino acids 251-260 and 271-595 of ER alpha, respectively. Studies of ER alpha complexed with heterotrimeric G proteins further show that estradiol causes the release of both G alpha i and G betagamma without stimulating GTP binding to G alpha i. Moreover, in COS-7 cells, the disruption of ER alpha-G alpha i interaction by deletion mutagenesis of ER alpha or expression of blocking peptide, as well as G betagamma sequestration with beta-adrenergic receptor kinase C terminus, prevents nongenomic responses to estradiol including src and erk activation. In endothelial cells, the disruption of ER alpha-G alpha i interaction prevents estradiol-induced nitric oxide synthase activation and the resulting attenuation of monocyte adhesion that contributes to estrogen-related cardiovascular protection. Thus, through direct interactions, ER alpha mediates a novel mechanism of G protein activation that provides greater diversity of function of both the steroid hormone receptor and G proteins.     

Global uterine genomics in vivo: microarray evaluation of the estrogen receptor alpha-growth factor cross-talk mechanism

Cross-talk between growth factor receptors and the estrogen receptor (ER) has been proposed as a signaling mechanism in estrogen target tissues, with ER(alpha) as a direct target of growth factor receptor-activated signals, leading to regulation of estrogen target genes and estrogen-like biological responses to growth factors. We evaluated whether global genomic changes in the mouse uterus in response to epidermal growth factor or IGF-I mimic those of estradiol (E2), reflecting the cross-talk mechanism. Overlapping responses to growth factors and E2 were expected in the wild type (WT) whereas no response was expected in mice lacking ER(alpha) (ER(alpha) knockout). Surprisingly, although most of the E2 response in the WT also occurred after growth factor treatment, some genes were induced only by E2. Second, although E2 did not induce gene changes in the ER(alpha) knockout, the growth factor response was almost indistinguishable from that of the WT. Differences in response of some genes to IGF-I or epidermal growth factor indicated selective regulation mechanisms, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase or MAPK-dependent responses. The robust ER(alpha)-independent genomic response to growth factor observed here is surprising considering that the biological growth response is ER(alpha) dependent. We propose two mechanisms as alternatives to the cross-talk mechanism for uterine gene regulation. First, E2 increases uterine growth factors, which activate downstream signaling cascades, resulting in gene regulation. Second, growth factors and estrogen regulate similar genes. Our results suggest that the estrogen response in the uterus involves E2-specific ER(alpha)-mediated responses as well as responses resulting from convergence of growth factor and ER-initiated activities.     

Estrogen-induced activation of Erk-1 and Erk-2 requires the G protein-coupled receptor homolog, GPR30, and occurs via trans-activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor through release of HB-EGF

Estrogen rapidly activates the mitogen-activated protein kinases, Erk-1 and Erk-2, via an as yet unknown mechanism. Here, evidence is provided that estrogen-induced Erk-1/-2 activation occurs independently of known estrogen receptors, but requires the expression of the G protein-coupled receptor homolog, GPR30. We show that 17beta-estradiol activates Erk-1/-2 not only in MCF-7 cells, which express both estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) and ER beta, but also in SKBR3 breast cancer cells, which fail to express either receptor. Immunoblot analysis using GPR30 peptide antibodies showed that this estrogen response was associated with the presence of GPR30 protein in these cells. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (ER alpha-, ER beta+) are GPR30 deficient and insensitive to Erk-1/-2 activation by 17beta-estradiol. Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells with a GPR30 complementary DNA resulted in overexpression of GPR30 protein and conversion to an estrogen-responsive phenotype. In addition, GPR30-dependent Erk-1/-2 activation was triggered by ER antagonists, including ICI 182,780, yet not by 17alpha-estradiol or progesterone. Consistent with acting through a G protein-coupled receptor, estradiol signaling to Erk-1/-2 occurred via a Gbetagamma-dependent, pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway that required Src-related tyrosine kinase activity and tyrosine phosphorylation of tyrosine 317 of the Shc adapter protein. Reinforcing this idea, estradiol signaling to Erk-1/-2 was dependent upon trans-activation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor via release of heparan-bound EGF (HB-EGF). Estradiol signaling to Erk-1/-2 could be blocked by: 1) inhibiting EGF-receptor tyrosine kinase activity, 2) neutralizing HB-EGF with antibodies, or 3) down-modulating HB-EGF from the cell surface with the diphtheria toxin mutant, CRM-197. Our data imply that ER-negative breast tumors that continue to express GPR30 may use estrogen to drive growth factor-dependent cellular responses.     

Neuroprotection by estrogen in the brain: the mitochondrial compartment as presumed therapeutic target

Neuroprotection by estrogen in the CNS is well-documented and comprises the intricate regulation of cell–cell communication between neurons and supportive non-neuronal glial cells. It is assumed that these interactions are essential for cell survival under pathological and toxic conditions by regulating the allocation of trophic molecules, e.g., growth factors, controlling relevant intracellular anti-apoptotic and death cascades, and attenuating inflammatory processes. Malfunction and disturbance of mitochondria are doubtlessly associated with brain cell degeneration during neurotoxic and neurodegenerative processes. Estrogen has been documented as protective agent in the brain by stimulating growth factor supply and cell-intrinsic pro-/anti-apoptotic signaling pathways. In recent years, an additional estrogen-dependent safe-guarding strategy comes into the focus of neuronal protection. The mitochondrial compartment appears to be regulated by estrogen at the level of ATP and reactive oxygen species production as well as under a structural-functional viewpoint. In the present article, we would like to highlight recent data which demonstrate that sex steroids can directly and indirectly interfere with mitochondrial properties via non-nuclear, presumably mitochondria-intrinsic and nuclear signaling mechanisms. This enables mitochondria to cope with pathological processes and provide stabile local energy homeostasis and an anti-apoptotic base setting in the brain which, in turn, is a prerequisite for neuronal survival.     

Anterior prostate epithelial AR inactivation modifies estrogen receptor expression and increases estrogen sensitivity

Androgens influence prostate growth and development, so androgen withdrawal can control progression of prostate diseases. Although estrogen treatment was originally used to induce androgen withdrawal, more recently direct estrogen effects on the prostate have been recognized, but the nature of androgen-estrogen interactions within the prostate remain poorly understood. To characterize androgen effects on estrogen sensitivity in the mouse prostate, we contrasted models of castration-induced androgen withdrawal in the prostate stromal and epithelial compartments with a prostate epithelial androgen receptor (AR) knockout (PEARKO) mouse model of selective epithelial AR inactivation. Castration markedly increased prostate epithelial estrogen receptor (ER)α immunoreactivity compared with very low ERα expression in intact males. Similarly, strong basal and luminal ERα expression was detected in PEARKO prostate of intact males, suggesting that epithelial AR activity regulated epithelial ERα expression. ERβ was strongly expressed in intact, castrated, and PEARKO prostate. However, strong clusters of epithelial ERβ positivity coincided with epithelial stratification in PEARKO prostate. In vivo estrogen sensitivity was increased in PEARKO males, with greater estradiol-induced prostate growth and epithelial proliferation leading to squamous metaplasia, featuring markedly increased epithelial proliferation, thickening, and keratinization compared with littermate controls. Our results suggest that ERα expression in the prostate epithelial cells is regulated by local, epithelia-specific, androgen-dependent mechanisms, and this imbalance in the AR- and ER-mediated signaling sensitizes the mature prostate to exogenous estrogens.     

Estrogen utilization of IGF-1-R and EGF-R to signal in breast cancer cells

As breast cancer cells develop secondary resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy, they increase their utilization of non-genomic signaling pathways. Our prior work demonstrated that estradiol causes an association of ERα with Shc, Src and the IGF-1-R. In cells developing resistance to estrogen deprivation (surrogate for aromatase inhibition) and to the anti-estrogens tamoxifen, 4-OH-tamoxifen, and fulvestrant, an increased association of ERα with c-Src and the EGF-R occurs. At the same time, there is a translocation of ERα out of the nucleus and into the cytoplasm and cell membrane. Blockade of c-Src with the Src kinase inhibitor, PP-2 causes relocation of ERα into the nucleus. While these changes are not identical in response to each anti-estrogen, ERα binding to the EGF-R is increased in response to 4-OH-tamoxifen when compared with tamoxifen. The changes in EGF-R interactions with ERα impart an enhanced sensitivity of tamoxifen-resistant cells to the inhibitory properties of the specific EGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor, AG 1478. However, with long term exposure of tamoxifen-resistant cells to AG 1478, the cells begin to re-grow but can now be inhibited by the IGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor, AG 1024. These data suggest that the IGF-R system becomes the predominant signaling mechanism as an adaptive response to the EGF-R inhibitor. Taken together, this information suggests that both the EGF-R and IGF-R pathways can mediate ERα signaling.To further examine the effects of fulvestrant on ERα function, we examined the acute effects of fulvestrant, on non-genomic functionality. Fulvestrant enhanced ERα association with the membrane IGF-1-receptor (IGF-1-R). Using siRNA or expression vectors to knock-down or knock-in selective proteins, we further demonstrated that the ERα/IGF-1-R association is Src-dependent. Fulvestrant rapidly induced IGF-1-R and MAPK phosphorylation. The Src inhibitor PP2 and IGF-1-R inhibitor AG1024 greatly blocked fulvestrant-induced ERα/IGF-1-R interaction leading to a further depletion of total cellular ERα induced by fulvestrant and further enhanced fulvestrant-induced cell growth arrest. More dramatic was the translocation of ERα to the plasma membrane in combination with the IGF-1-R as shown by confocal microscopy. Taken in aggregate, these studies suggest that secondary resistance to hormonal therapy results in usage of both IGF-R and EGF-R for non-genomic signaling.     

Integration of Biochemical and Biomechanical Signals Regulating Endothelial Barrier Function

Endothelial barrier function is critical for tissue homeostasis throughout the body. Disruption of the endothelial monolayer leads to edema, vascular diseases and even cancer metastasis among other pathological conditions. Breakdown of the endothelial barrier integrity triggered by cytokines (e.g.IL-8,IL-1β) and growth factors (e.g.VEGF) is well documented. However, endothelial cells are subject to major biomechanical forces that affect their behavior. Due to their unique location at the interface between circulating blood and surrounding tissues, endothelial cells experience shear stress, strain and contraction forces. More than three decades ago, it was already appreciated that shear flow caused endothelial cells alignment in the direction of the flow. After that observation, it took around 20 years to begin to uncover some of the mechanisms used by the cells for mechanotransduction. In this review, we describe mechanosensors on the endothelium identified to date and the associated signaling pathways that integrate biochemical and biomechanical inputs into biological responses and how they modulate the integrity of the endothelial barrier.     

Robo4 maintains vessel integrity and inhibits angiogenesis by interacting with UNC5B

Robo4 is an endothelial cell-specific member of the Roundabout axon guidance receptor family. To identify Robo4 binding partners, we performed a protein-protein interaction screen with the Robo4 extracellular domain. We find that Robo4 specifically binds to UNC5B, a vascular Netrin receptor, revealing unexpected interactions between two endothelial guidance receptors. We show that Robo4 maintains vessel integrity by activating UNC5B, which inhibits signaling downstream of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Function-blocking monoclonal antibodies against Robo4 and UNC5B increase angiogenesis and disrupt vessel integrity. Soluble Robo4 protein inhibits VEGF-induced vessel permeability and rescues barrier defects in Robo4(-/-) mice, but not in mice treated with anti-UNC5B. Thus, Robo4-UNC5B signaling maintains vascular integrity by counteracting VEGF signaling in endothelial cells, identifying a novel function of guidance receptor interactions in the vasculature.