Regulation of ASAP1 by phospholipids is dependent on the interface between the PH and Arf GAP domains

ASAP1 is an Arf GAP with a PH domain immediately N-terminal to the catalytic Arf GAP domain. PH domains are thought to regulate enzymes by binding to specific phosphoinositide lipids in membranes, thereby recruiting the enzyme to a site of action. Here, we have examined the functional relationship between the PH and Arf GAP domains. We found that GAP activity requires the cognate PH domain of ASAP1, leading us to hypothesize that the Arf GAP and PH domains directly interact to form the substrate binding site. This hypothesis was supported by the combined results of protection and hydrodynamic studies. We then examined the role of the PH domain in the regulation of Arf GAP activity. The results of saturation kinetics, limited proteolysis, FRET and fluorescence spectrometry support a model in which regulation of the GAP activity of ASAP1 involves a conformational change coincident with recruitment to a membrane surface, and a second conformational change following the specific binding of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate.     

Dynamic interaction between Arf GAP and PH domains of ASAP1 in the regulation of GAP activity

ASAP family Arf GAPs induce the hydrolysis of GTP bound to the Ras superfamily protein Arf1, regulate cell adhesion and migration and have been implicated in carcinogenesis. The ASAP proteins have a core catalytic domain of PH, Arf GAP and Ank repeat domains. The PH domain is necessary for both biological and catalytic functions of ASAP1 and has been proposed to be integrally folded with the Arf GAP domain. Protection studies and analytical ultracentrifugation studies previously reported indicated that the domains are, at least partly, folded together. Here, using NMR spectroscopy and biochemical analysis, we have further tested this hypothesis and characterized the interdomain interaction. A comparison of NMR spectra of three recombinant proteins comprised of either the isolated PH domain of ASAP1, the Arf GAP and ankyrin repeat domain or all three domains indicated that the PH domain did interact with the Arf GAP and Ank repeat domains; however, we found a significant amount of dynamic independence between the PH and Arf GAP domains, consistent with the interactions being transient. In contrast, the Arf GAP and Ank repeat domains form a relatively rigid structure. The PH-Arf GAP domain interaction partially occluded the phosphoinositide binding site in the soluble protein, but binding studies indicated the PIP2 binding site was accessible in ASAP1 bound to a lipid bilayer surface. Phosphoinositide binding altered the conformation of the PH domain, but had little effect on the structure of the Arf GAP domain. Mutations in a loop of the PH domain that contacts the Arf GAP domain affected PIP2 binding and the K(m) and k(cat) for converting Arf1 GTP to Arf1 GDP. Based on these results, we generated a homology model of a composite PH/Arf GAP/Ank repeat domain structure. We propose that the PH domain contributes to Arf GAP activity by either binding to or positioning Arf1 GTP that is simultaneously bound to the Arf GAP domain.     

Differences between AGAP1, ASAP1 and Arf GAP1 in substrate recognition: interaction with the N-terminus of Arf1

The Arf GAPs are a structurally diverse group of proteins that catalyze the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Arf1. Here, we directly compare the role of amino acids 2-17 of Arf1, a GTP- and phospholipid-sensitive switch, for interaction with three Arf GAPs: Arf GAP1, AGAP1 and ASAP1. Sequestration of amino acids 2-17 with an antibody inhibited interaction with the three tested Arf GAPs. Examination of Arf1 mutants also indicated that [2-17]Arf1 is a critical structural determinant of interaction with all three Arf GAPs; however, the effect of specific mutations differed among the GAPs. Compared to wild-type Arf1, Arf1 with the amino terminal 13 ([Delta13]Arf1) and 17 amino acids ([Delta17]Arf1) deleted had 200- and 4000-fold reduced interaction with ASAP1 and 150-fold reduced interaction with AGAP1. In contrast, deletion of the amino terminus of Arf reduced interaction with Arf GAP1 by 5-fold. By analysis of point mutants, we found that lysines 15 and 16 had a greater contribution to productive interaction between Arf1, ASAP1 and AGAP1 than between Arf1 and Arf GAP1. Leucine 8 contributed to the interaction with Arf GAP1 but not with ASAP1 and AGAP1. Amino acids 2-17 of Arf1, isolated from the protein, inhibited GAP activity of Arf GAP1, ASAP1 and AGAP1 and bound directly to ASAP1. Taken together, our results indicate that (i) Arf GAPs interact with amino acids 2-17 of Arf1 and (ii) each subgroup of Arf GAPs has a unique interface with Arf1.     

A BAR domain in the N terminus of the Arf GAP ASAP1 affects membrane structure and trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor

BACKGROUND: Arf GAPs are multidomain proteins that function in membrane traffic by inactivating the GTP binding protein Arf1. Numerous Arf GAPs contain a BAR domain, a protein structural element that contributes to membrane traffic by either inducing or sensing membrane curvature. We have examined the role of a putative BAR domain in the function of the Arf GAP ASAP1. RESULTS: ASAP1's N terminus, containing the putative BAR domain together with a PH domain, dimerized to form an extended structure that bound to large unilamellar vesicles containing acidic phospholipids, properties that define a BAR domain. A recombinant protein containing the BAR domain of ASAP1, together with the PH and Arf GAP domains, efficiently bent the surface of large unilamellar vesicles, resulting in the formation of tubular structures. This activity was regulated by Arf1*GTP binding to the Arf GAP domain. In vivo, the tubular structures induced by ASAP1 mutants contained epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Rab11, and ASAP1 colocalized in tubular structures with EGFR during recycling of receptor. Expression of ASAP1 accelerated EGFR trafficking and slowed cell spreading. An ASAP1 mutant lacking the BAR domain had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: The N-terminal BAR domain of ASAP1 mediates membrane bending and is necessary for ASAP1 function. The Arf dependence of the bending activity is consistent with ASAP1 functioning as an Arf effector.     

AlFx affects the formation of focal complexes by stabilizing the Arf-GAP ASAP1 in a complex with Arf1

Aluminum fluoride (AlFx) is known to activate directly the alpha subunit of G-proteins but not the homologous small GTP-binding proteins. However, AlFx can stabilize complexes formed between Ras, RhoA or Cdc42 and their corresponding GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Here, we demonstrate that Arf1GDP can be converted into an active conformation by AlFx to form a complex with the Arf-GAP ASAP1 in vitro and in vivo. Within this complex ASAP1, which GAP activity is inoperative, can still alter the recruitment of paxillin to the focal complexes, thus indicating that ASAP1 interferes with focal complexes independently of its GAP activity.     

Kinetic analysis of GTP hydrolysis catalysed by the Arf1-GTP-ASAP1 complex

Arf (ADP-ribosylation factor) GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins) are enzymes that catalyse the hydrolysis of GTP bound to the small GTP-binding protein Arf. They have also been proposed to function as Arf effectors and oncogenes. We have set out to characterize the kinetics of the GAP-induced GTP hydrolysis using a truncated form of ASAP1 [Arf GAP with SH3 (Src homology 3) domain, ankyrin repeats and PH (pleckstrin homology) domains 1] as a model. We found that ASAP1 used Arf1-GTP as a substrate with a k(cat) of 57+/-5 s(-1) and a K(m) of 2.2+/-0.5 microM determined by steady-state kinetics and a kcat of 56+/-7 s(-1) determined by single-turnover kinetics. Tetrafluoroaluminate (AlF4-), which stabilizes complexes of other Ras family members with their cognate GAPs, also stabilized a complex of Arf1-GDP with ASAP1. As anticipated, mutation of Arg-497 to a lysine residue affected kcat to a much greater extent than K(m). Changing Trp-479, Iso-490, Arg-505, Leu-511 or Asp-512 was predicted, based on previous studies, to affect affinity for Arf1-GTP. Instead, these mutations primarily affected the k(cat). Mutants that lacked activity in vitro similarly lacked activity in an in vivo assay of ASAP1 function, the inhibition of dorsal ruffle formation. Our results support the conclusion that the Arf GAP ASAP1 functions in binary complex with Arf1-GTP to induce a transition state towards GTP hydrolysis. The results have led us to speculate that Arf1-GTP-ASAP1 undergoes a significant conformational change when transitioning from the ground to catalytically active state. The ramifications for the putative effector function of ASAP1 are discussed.     

Thermodynamic analysis reveals that GTP binding affects the interaction between the alpha- and gamma-subunits of translation initiation factor 2

Eukaryotic and archaeal translation initiation factors 2, heterotrimers that consist of α-, β-, and γ-subunits, deliver methionylated initiator tRNA to a small ribosomal subunit in a manner that depends on GTP. To evaluate correlation of the function and association of the subunits, we used isothermal titration calorimetry to analyze the thermodynamics of the interactions between the α- and γ-subunits in the presence or absence of a nonhydrolyzable GTP analog or GDP. The α-subunits bound to the γ-subunit with large heat capacity change (ΔC_p) values. The ΔH and ΔC_p values for the interaction between the α- and γ-subunits varied in the presence of the GTP analog but not in the presence of GDP. These results suggest that the binding of both the α-subunit and GTP changes the conformation of the switch region of the γ-subunit and increases the affinity of the γ-subunit for tRNA.     

Kinetic analysis of Arf GAP1 indicates a regulatory role for coatomer

Arf GAPs are a family of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Arf. Arf GAP1 is one member of the family that has a critical role in membrane traffic at the Golgi apparatus. Two distinct models for the regulation of Arf GAP1 in membrane traffic have been proposed. In one model, Arf GAP1 functions in a ternary complex with coat proteins and is inhibited by cargo proteins. In another model, Arf GAP1 is recruited to a membrane surface that has defects created by the increased membrane curvature that accompanies transport vesicle formation. Here we have used kinetic and mutational analysis to test predictions of models of regulation of Arf GAP1. We found that Arf GAP1 has a similar affinity for Arf1.GTP as another Arf GAP, ASAP1, but the catalytic rate is approximately 0.5% that of ASAP1. Coatomer stimulated Arf GAP1 activity; however, different from that predicted from the current model, coatomer affected the K(m) and not the k(cat) values. Effects of most mutations in Arf GAP1 paralleled those in ASAP1. Mutation of an arginine that aligned with an arginine presumed to be catalytic in ASAP1 abrogated activity. Peptide from the cytoplasmic tail of cargo proteins inhibited Arf GAP1; however, the unrelated Arf GAP ASAP1 was also inhibited. The curvature of the lipid bilayer had a small effect on activity of Arf GAP1 under the conditions of our experiments. We conclude that coatomer is an allosteric regulator of Arf GAP1. The relevance of the results to the two models of Arf GAP1-mediated regulation of Arf1 is discussed.     

Mutational analysis reveals a single binding interface between RhoA and its effector, PRK1

Protein kinase C-related kinases (PRKs) are serine/threonine kinases that are members of the protein kinase C superfamily and can be activated by binding to members of the Rho family of small G proteins via a Rho binding motif known as an HR1 domain. The PRKs contain three tandem HR1 domains at their N-termini. The structure of the HR1a domain from PRK1 in complex with RhoA [Maesaki, R., et al. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 793-803] identified two potential contact interfaces between the G protein and the HR1a domain. In this work, we have used an alanine scanning mutagenesis approach to identify whether both contact sites are used when the two proteins interact in solution and also whether HR1b, the second HR1 domain from PRK1, plays a role in binding to RhoA. The mutagenesis identified just one contact site as being relevant for binding of RhoA and HR1a in solution, and the HR1b domain was found not to contribute to RhoA binding. The folded state and thermal stability of the HR1a and HR1b domains were also investigated. HR1b was found to be more thermally stable than HR1a, and it is hypothesized that the differences in the biophysical properties of these two domains govern their interaction with small G proteins.     

DEF-1/ASAP1 is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for ARF1 that enhances cell motility through a GAP-dependent mechanism.

DEF-1/ASAP1 is an ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein (ARF GAP) that localizes to focal adhesions and is involved in cytoskeletal regulation. In this paper, we use a cell-based ARF GAP assay to demonstrate that DEF-1 functions as a GAP for ARF1 and not ARF6 in vivo. This degree of substrate preference was unique to DEF-1, as other ARF GAP proteins, ACAP1, ACAP2, and ARFGAP1, were able to function on both ARF1 and ARF6. Since transient overexpression of DEF-1 has been shown to interfere with focal adhesion formation and platelet-derived growth factor-induced membrane ruffling, we investigated whether NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing DEF-1 have altered cell motility. Here we report that ectopic DEF-1 enhances cell migration toward PDGF as well as IGF-1. This chemotactic effect appears to result from a general increase in cell motility, as DEF-1-expressing cells also exhibit enhanced levels of basal and chemokinetic motility. The increase in cell motility is dependent on DEF-1 GAP activity, since a DEF-1 mutant lacking the GAP domain failed to stimulate motility. This suggests that DEF-1 alters cell motility through the deactivation of ARF1. In contrast, the inhibition of cell spreading by DEF-1 was not dependent on GAP activity, indicating that spreading and motility are altered by DEF-1 through different pathways.     

An Arf(GFP/GFP) reporter mouse reveals that the Arf tumor suppressor monitors latent oncogenic signals in vivo

Understanding how the Arf tumor suppressor is activated in response to abnormally elevated mitogenic signaling thresholds is a particularly vexing problem. Studies of a knock-in mouse strain in which sequences encoding green fluorescent protein were substituted for those encoding p19Arf argue that the Arf gene responds to latent oncogenic signals in vivo to eliminate incipient cancer cells.     

Autoinhibition of Arf GTPase-activating Protein Activity by the BAR Domain in ASAP1

ASAP1 is an Arf GTPase-activating protein (GAP) that functions on membrane surfaces to catalyze the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Arf. ASAP1 contains a tandem of BAR, pleckstrin homology (PH), and Arf GAP domains and contributes to the formation of invadopodia and podosomes. The PH domain interacts with the catalytic domain influencing both the catalytic and Michaelis constants. Tandem BAR-PH domains have been found to fold into a functional unit. The results of sedimentation velocity studies were consistent with predictions from homology models in which the BAR and PH domains of ASAP1 fold together. We set out to test the hypothesis that the BAR domain of ASAP1 affects GAP activity by interacting with the PH and/or Arf GAP domains. Recombinant proteins composed of the BAR, PH, Arf GAP, and Ankyrin repeat domains (called BAR-PZA) and the PH, Arf GAP, and Ankyrin repeat domains (PZA) were compared. Catalytic power for the two proteins was determined using large unilamellar vesicles as a reaction surface. The catalytic power of PZA was greater than that of BAR-PZA. The effect of the BAR domain was dependent on the N-terminal loop of the BAR domain and was not the consequence of differential membrane association or changes in large unilamellar vesicle curvature. The K_m for BAR-PZA was greater and the k_cat was smaller than for PZA determined by saturation kinetics. Analysis of single turnover kinetics revealed a transition state intermediate that was affected by the BAR domain. We conclude that BAR domains can affect enzymatic activity through intraprotein interactions.The Bin, amphiphysin, RSV161/167 (BAR)² domain is a recently identified structural element in proteins that regulate membrane trafficking (1–7). The BAR superfamily comprises three subfamilies: F-BAR, I-BAR, and BAR. The BAR group can be further subdivided into BAR, N-BAR, PX-BAR, and BAR-pleckstrin homology (PH). The BAR group domains consist of three bundled α-helices that homodimerize to form a banana-shaped structure. The inner curved face can bind preferentially to surfaces with similar curvatures. As a consequence, BAR domains can function as membrane curvature sensors or as inducers of membrane curvature. BAR domains also bind to proteins (8, 9). Several proteins contain a BAR domain immediately N-terminal to a PH domain, which also mediates regulated membrane association (10–13). In the protein APPL1 (9), the BAR-PH domains fold together forming a binding site for the small GTP-binding protein Rab5. Arf GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) are regulators of Arf family GTP-binding proteins (14–18). Two subtypes of Arf GAPs have N-terminal BAR and PH domains similar to that found in APPL1.Thirty-one genes encode Arf GAPs in humans (16–18). Each member of the family has an Arf GAP domain that catalyzes the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Arf family GTP-binding proteins. The Arf GAPs are otherwise structurally diverse. ASAP1 is an Arf GAP that affects membrane traffic and actin remodeling involved in cell movement and has been implicated in oncogenesis (19–22). ASAP1 contains, from the N terminus, BAR, PH, Arf GAP, Ankyrin repeat, proline-rich, and SH3 domains.ASAP1 contains a BAR domain immediately N-terminal to a PH domain. The PH domain of ASAP1 is functionally integrated with the Arf GAP domain and may form part of the substrate binding pocket (23, 24). The PH domain binds specifically to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂), a constituent of the membrane, leading to stimulation of GAP activity by a mechanism that is, in part, independent of recruitment to membranes (23, 25). The BAR domain of ASAP1 is critical for in vivo function of ASAP1, but the molecular functions of the BAR domain of ASAP1 have not been extensively characterized. Hypotheses related to membrane curvature have been examined. Recombinant ASAP1 can induce the formation of tubules from large unilamellar vesicles, which may be related to a function of ASAP1 in membrane traffic. The BAR domain might also regulate GAP activity of ASAP1. We have considered two mechanisms based on the known properties of BAR domains. First the BAR domain could regulate association of ASAP1 with membrane surfaces containing the substrate Arf1·GTP. The BAR domain could also affect GAP activity through an intramolecular association. In one BAR-PH protein that has been crystallized (APPL1), the two domains fold together to form a protein binding site (9). In ASAP1, the PH domain is functionally integrated with the GAP domain, raising the possibility that the BAR domain affects GAP activity by folding with the PH domain.Here we compared the kinetics of recombinant proteins composed of the PH, Arf GAP, and Ankyrin repeat (PZA)³ or BAR, PH, Arf GAP, and Ankyrin repeat (BAR-PZA) domains of ASAP1 to test the hypothesis that the BAR domain affects enzymatic activity. We found kinetic differences between the proteins that could not be explained by membrane association properties. The results were consistent with a model in which the BAR domain affects transition of ASAP1 through its catalytic cycle.     

Mutational analysis of the lac regulatory region: second-site changes that activate mutant promoters.

Second-site mutations that restored activity to severe lacP1 down-promoter mutants were isolated. This was accomplished by using a bacteriophage f1 vector containing a fusion of the mutant E. coli lac promoters with the structural gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), so that a system was provided for selecting phage revertants (or pseudorevertants) that conferred resistance of phage-infected cells to chloramphenicol. Among the second-site changes that relieved defects in mutant lac promoters, the only one that restored lacP1 activity was a T----G substitution at position -14, a weakly conserved site in E. coli promoters. Three other sequence changes, G----A at -2, A----T at +1, and C----A at +10, activated nascent promoters in the lac regulatory region. The nascent promoters conformed to the consensus rule, that activity is gained by sequence changes toward homology with consensus sequences at the -35 and -10 regions of the promoter. However, the relative activities of some promoters cannot be explained solely by consideration of their conserved sequence elements.     

The tyrosine kinase Pyk2 regulates Arf1 activity by phosphorylation and inhibition of the Arf-GTPase-activating protein ASAP1

Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2), a non-receptor tyrosine kinase structurally related to focal adhesion kinase, has been implicated in the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades and ion channels, the induction of apoptosis, and in the modulation of the cytoskeleton. In order to understand how Pyk2 signaling mediates these diverse cellular functions, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screening using the C-terminal part of Pyk2 that contains potential protein-protein interaction sites as bait. A prominent binder of Pyk2 identified by this method was the Arf-GTPase-activating protein ASAP1. Pyk2-ASAP1 interaction was confirmed in pull-down as well as in co-immunoprecipitation experiments, and contact sites were mapped to the proline-rich regions of Pyk2 and the SH3 domain of ASAP1. Pyk2 directly phosphorylates ASAP1 on tyrosine residues in vitro and increases ASAP1 tyrosine phosphorylation when co-expressed in HEK293T cells. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 308 and 782 affects the phosphoinositide binding profile of ASAP1, and fluorimetric Arf-GTPase assays with purified proteins revealed an inhibition of ASAP1 GTPase-activating protein activity by Pyk2-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation. We therefore provide evidence for a functional interaction between Pyk2 and ASAP1 and a regulation of ASAP1 and hence Arf1 activity by Pyk2-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation.     

Role of the Arf6 GDP/GTP cycle and Arf6 GTPase-activating proteins in actin remodeling and intracellular transport

We have analyzed both biochemically and functionally a series of Arf6 mutants, providing new insights into the molecular mode of action of the small G protein Arf6. First, by comparing a fast-cycling mutant (Arf6(T157N)) and a GTPase-deficient mutant (Arf6(Q67L)), we established the necessity for completion of the Arf6 GDP/GTP cycle for recycling of major histocompatibility complex molecules to the plasma membrane. Second, we found that aluminum fluoride (AlF), known for inducing membrane protrusion in cells expressing exogenous wild-type Arf6, stabilized a functional wild-type Arf6.AlF(x) . GTPase-activating protein (GAP) complex in vitro and in vivo. We also found that the tandem mutation Q37E/S38I prevented the binding of two Arf GAPs, but not the effector ARHGAP10, and blocked the formation of membrane protrusion and actin reorganization. Together, our results with AlF(x) and Arf6(Q37E/S38I) demonstrate the critical role of the Arf6 GAPs as effectors for Arf6-regulated actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Finally, competition experiments conducted in vivo suggest the existence of a membrane receptor for GDP-bound Arf6.     

Mutational analysis of sites in the translational regulator, PHAS-I, that are selectively phosphorylated by mTOR.

Results obtained with PHAS-I proteins having Ser to Ala mutations in the five known phosphorylation sites indicate that mTOR preferentially phosphorylates Thr36 and Thr45. The effects of phosphorylating these sites on eIF4E binding were assessed in a far-Western analysis with a labeled eIF4E probe. Phosphorylation of Thr36 only slightly attenuated binding of PHAS-I to eIF4E, while phosphorylation of Thr45 markedly inhibited binding. Phosphorylation of neither site affected the electrophoretic mobility of the protein, indicating that results of studies that rely solely on a gel-shift assay to assess changes in PHAS-I phosphorylation must be interpreted with caution.     

A PH Domain in the Arf GTPase-activating Protein (GAP) ARAP1 Binds Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-Trisphosphate and Regulates Arf GAP Activity Independently of Recruitment to the Plasma Membranes

ARAP1 is a phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃)-dependent Arf GTPase-activating protein (GAP) with five PH domains that regulates endocytic trafficking of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Two tandem PH domains are immediately N-terminal of the Arf GAP domain, and one of these fits the consensus sequence for PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ binding. Here, we tested the hypothesis that PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃-dependent recruitment mediated by the first PH domain of ARAP1 regulates the in vivo and in vitro function of ARAP1. We found that PH1 of ARAP1 specifically bound to PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃, but with relatively low affinity (≈1.6 μm), and the PH domains did not mediate PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃-dependent recruitment to membranes in cells. However, PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ binding to the PH domain stimulated GAP activity and was required for in vivo function of ARAP1 as a regulator of endocytic trafficking of the EGFR. Based on these results, we propose a variation on the model for the function of phosphoinositide-binding PH domains. In our model, ARAP1 is recruited to membranes independently of PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃, the subsequent production of which triggers enzymatic activity.Pleckstrin homology (PH)² domains are a common structural motif encoded by the human genome (1, 2). Approximately 10% of PH domains bind to phosphoinositides. These PH domains are thought to mediate phosphoinositide-dependent recruitment to membranes (1–3). Most PH domains likely have functions other than or in addition to phosphoinositide binding. For example, PH domains have been found to bind to protein and DNA (4–12). In addition, some PH domains have been found to be structurally and functionally integrated with adjacent domains (13, 14). A small fraction of PH domain-containing proteins (about 9% of the human proteins) have multiple PH domains arranged in tandem, which have been proposed to function as adaptors but have only been examined in one protein (15, 16). Arf GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) of the ARAP family are phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃)-dependent Arf GAPs with tandem PH domains (17, 18). The function of specific PH domains in regulating Arf GAP activity and for biologic activity has not been described.Arf GAPs are proteins that induce the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Arfs (19–23). The Arf proteins are members of the Ras superfamily of GTP-binding proteins (24–27). The six Arf proteins in mammals (five in humans) are divided into three classes based on primary sequence: Arf1, -2, and -3 are class 1, Arf4 and -5 are class 2, and Arf6 is class 3 (23, 24, 27–29). Class 1 and class 3 Arf proteins have been studied more extensively than class 2. They have been found to regulate membrane traffic and the actin cytoskeleton.The Arf GAPs are a family of proteins with diverse domain structures (20, 21, 23, 30). ARAPs, the most structurally complex of the Arf GAPs, contain, in addition to an Arf GAP domain, the sterile α motif (SAM), five PH, Rho GAP, and Ras association domains (17, 18, 31, 32). The first and second and the third and fourth PH domains are tandem (Fig. 1). The first and third PH domains of the ARAPs fit the consensus for PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ binding (33–35). ARAPs have been found to affect actin and membrane traffic (21, 23). ARAP3 regulates growth factor-induced ruffling of porcine aortic endothelial cells (31, 36, 37). The function is dependent on the Arf GAP and Rho GAP domains. ARAP2 regulates focal adhesions, an actin cytoskeletal structure (17). ARAP2 function requires Arf GAP activity and a Rho GAP domain capable of binding RhoA·GTP. ARAP1 has been found to have a role in membrane traffic (18). The protein associates with pre-early endosomes involved in the attenuation of EGFR signals. The function of the tandem PH domains in the ARAPs has not been examined.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.ARAP1 binding to phospholipids. A, schematic of the recombinant proteins used in this study. Domain abbreviations: Ank, ankyrin repeat; PLCδ-PH, PH domain of phospholipase C δ; RA, Ras association motif; RhoGAP, Rho GTPase-activating domain. B, ARAP1 phosphoinositide binding specificity. 500 nm PH1-Ank recombinant protein was incubated with sucrose-loaded LUVs formed by extrusion through a 1-μm pore filter. LUVs contained PtdIns alone or PtdIns with 2.5 μm PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃, 2.5 μm PtdIns(3)P, 2.5 μm PtdIns(4)P, 2.5 μm PtdIns(5)P, 2.5 μm PtdIns(3,4)P₂, 2.5 μm PtdIns(3,5)P₂, or 2.5 μm PtdIns(4,5)P₂ with a total phosphoinositide concentration of 50 μm and a total phospholipid concentration of 500 μm. Vesicles were precipitated by ultracentrifugation, and associated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. The amount of precipitated protein was determined by densitometry of the Coomassie Blue-stained gels with standards on each gel. C, PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃-dependent binding of ARAP1 to LUVs. 1 μm PH1-Ank or ArfGAP-Ank recombinant protein was incubated with 1 mm sucrose-loaded LUVs formed by extrusion through a 1-μm pore size filter containing varying concentration of PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃. Precipitation of LUVs and analysis of associated proteins were performed as described in B. The average ± S.E. of three independent experiments is presented.Here we investigated the role of the first two PH domains of ARAP1 for catalysis and in vivo function. The first PH domain fits the consensus sequence for PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ binding (33–35). The second does not fit a phosphoinositide binding consensus but is immediately N-terminal to the GAP domain. We have previously reported that the PH domain that occurs immediately N-terminal of the Arf GAP domain of ASAP1 is critical for the catalytic function of the protein (38, 39). We tested the hypothesis that the two PH domains of ARAP1 function independently; one recruits ARAP1 to PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃-rich membranes, and the other functions with the catalytic domain. As predicted, PH1 interacted specifically with PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃, and PH2 did not. However, both PH domains contributed to catalysis independently of recruitment to membranes. None of the PH domains in ARAP1 mediated PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃-dependent targeting to plasma membranes (PM). PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ stimulated GAP activity, and the ability to bind PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ was required for ARAP1 to regulate membrane traffic. We propose that ARAP1 is recruited independently of PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ to the PM where PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ subsequently regulates its GAP activity to control endocytic events.     

Specific regulation of the adaptor protein complex AP-3 by the Arf GAP AGAP1

Arf1 regulates membrane trafficking at several membrane sites by interacting with at least seven different vesicle coat proteins. Here, we test the hypothesis that Arf1-dependent coats are independently regulated by specific interaction with Arf GAPs. We find that the Arf GAP AGAP1 directly associates with and colocalizes with AP-3, a coat protein complex involved in trafficking in the endosomal-lysosomal system. Binding is mediated by the PH domain of AGAP1 and the delta and sigma3 subunits of AP-3. Overexpression of AGAP1 changes the cellular distribution of AP-3, and reduced expression of AGAP1 renders AP-3 resistant to brefeldin A. AGAP1 overexpression does not affect the distribution of other coat proteins, and AP-3 distribution is not affected by overexpression of other Arf GAPs. Cells overexpressing AGAP1 also exhibit increased LAMP1 trafficking via the plasma membrane. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that AGAP1 directly and specifically regulates AP-3-dependent trafficking.