Determination of alpha-helix N1 energies after addition of N1, N2, and N3 preferences to helix/coil theory

Surveys of protein crystal structures have revealed that amino acids show unique structural preferences for the N1, N2, and N3 positions in the first turn of the alpha-helix. We have therefore extended helix-coil theory to include statistical weights for these locations. The helix content of a peptide in this model is a function of N-cap, C-cap, N1, N2, N3, C1, and helix interior (N4 to C2) preferences. The partition function for the system is calculated using a matrix incorporating the weights of the fourth residue in a hexamer of amino acids and is implemented using a FORTRAN program. We have applied the model to calculate the N1 preferences of Gln, Val, Ile, Ala, Met, Pro, Leu, Thr, Gly, Ser, and Asn, using our previous data on helix contents of peptides Ac-XAKAAAAKAAGY-CONH2. We find that Ala has the highest preference for the N1 position. Asn is the most unfavorable, destabilizing a helix at N1 by at least 1.4 kcal mol(-1) compared to Ala. The remaining amino acids all have similar preferences, 0.5 kcal mol(-1) less than Ala. Gln, Asn, and Ser, therefore, do not stabilize the helix when at N1.     

Alpha-helix stability in proteins. I. Empirical correlations concerning substitution of side-chains at the N and C-caps and the replacement of alanine by glycine or serine at solvent-exposed surfaces.

The importance of amino acid side-chains in helix stability has been investigated by making a series of mutations at the N-caps, C-caps and internal positions of the solvent-exposed faces of the two alpha-helices of barnase. There is a strong positional and context dependence of the effect of a particular amino acid on stability. Correlations have been found that provide insight into the physical basis of helix stabilization. The relative effects of Ala and Gly (or Ser) may be rationalized on the basis of solvent-accessible surface areas: burial of hydrophobic surface stabilizes the protein as does exposure to solvent of unpaired hydrogen bond donors or acceptors in the protein. There is a good correlation between the relative stabilizing effects of Ala and Gly at internal positions with the total change in solvent-accessible hydrophobic surface area of the folded protein on mutation of Ala----Gly. The relationship may be extended to the N and C-caps by including an extra term in hydrophilic surface area for the solvent exposure of the non-intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded main-chain CO, NH or protein side-chain hydrogen bonding groups. The requirement for solvent exposure of the C-cap main-chain CO groups may account for the strong preference for residues having positive phi and psi angles at this position, since this alpha L-conformation results in the largest solvent exposure of the C-terminal CO groups. Glycine in an alpha L-conformation results in the greatest exposure of these CO groups. Further, the side-chains of His, Asn, Arg and Lys may, with positive phi and psi-angles, form a hydrogen bond with the backbone CO of residue in position C -3 (residues are numbered relative to the C-cap). The preferences at the C-cap are Gly much greater than His greater than Asn greater than Arg greater than Lys greater than Ala approximately Ser approximately greater than Asp. The preferences at the N-cap are determined by hydrogen bonding of side-chains or solvent to the exposed backbone NH groups and are: Thr approximately Asp approximately Ser greater than Gly approximately Asn greater than Gln approximately Glu approximately His greater than Ala greater than Val much greater than Pro. These general trends may be obscured when mutation allows another side-chain to become a surrogate cap.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Structures of N-termini of helices in proteins.

We have surveyed 393 N-termini of alpha-helices and 156 N-termini of 3(10)-helices in 85 high resolution, non-homologous protein crystal structures for N-cap side-chain rotamer preferences, hydrogen bonding patterns, and solvent accessibilities. We find very strong rotamer preferences that are unique to N-cap sites. The following rules are generally observed for N-capping in alpha-helices: Thr and Ser N-cap side chains adopt the gauche - rotamer, hydrogen bond to the N3 NH and have psi restricted to 164 +/- 8 degrees. Asp and Asn N-cap side chains either adopt the gauche - rotamer and hydrogen bond to the N3 NH with psi = 172 +/- 10 degrees, or adopt the trans rotamer and hydrogen bond to both the N2 and N3 NH groups with psi = 1-7 +/- 19 degrees. With all other N-caps, the side chain is found in the gauche + rotamer so that the side chain does not interact unfavorably with the N-terminus by blocking solvation and psi is unrestricted. An i, i + 3 hydrogen bond from N3 NH to the N-cap backbone C = O in more likely to form at the N-terminus when an unfavorable N-cap is present. In the 3(10)-helix Asn and Asp remain favorable N-caps as they can hydrogen bond to the N2 NH while in the trans rotamer; in contrast, Ser and Thr are disfavored as their preferred hydrogen bonding partner (N3 NH) is inaccessible. This suggests that Ser is the optimum choice of N-cap when alpha-helix formation is to be encouraged while 3(10)-helix formation discouraged. The strong energetic and structural preferences found for N-caps, which differ greatly from positions within helix interiors, suggest that N-caps should be treated explicitly in any consideration of helical structure in peptides or proteins.     

Beta-sheet capping: signals that initiate and terminate beta-sheet formation

In the present work, we address the question of whether different amino acids have different beta-sheet initiating and terminating characteristics. Using a large scale analysis of parallel and antiparallel beta-sheets in a non-redundant dataset of proteins, we observed that most of the amino acids show significant under- or over-representation in at least one of the positions at the two ends of beta-sheets, which are denoted as N-cap and C-cap. In addition, based on statistical data and structural comparison, we found that certain amino acids, especially Asp, Asn, Gly and Pro have strong tendencies to block beta-sheet continuation. Hence, we can consider these residues as beta-sheet terminators. It was also proposed that the dipole moments in parallel beta-sheets, whose direction is from C-terminal (partially negative) to N-terminal (partially positive), are much stronger than has previously been suggested. In fact, enhancement of dipole moments in parallel beta-sheets is a result of the positioning of positively charged residues at N-cap and negatively charged residues at C-cap. This enhancement in dipole moment magnitude leads to strengthened dipolar interactions between parallel beta-sheets dipoles and other partners especially alpha-helices dipoles. The results provide an explanation for the antiparallel alignment of parallel beta-sheets with alpha-helices.     

Effect of the N1 residue on the stability of the alpha-helix for all 20 amino acids

N1 is the first residue in an alpha-helix. We have measured the contribution of all 20 amino acids to the stability of a small helical peptide CH(3)CO-XAAAAQAAAAQAAGY-NH(2) at the N1 position. By substituting every residue into the N1 position, we were able to investigate the stabilizing role of each amino acid in an isolated context. The helix content of each of the 20 peptides was measured by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The data were analyzed by our modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory, which includes the n1 parameter, to find free energies for placing a residue into the N1 position. The rank order for free energies is Asp(-), Ala > Glu(-) > Glu(0) > Trp, Leu, Ser > Asp(0), Thr, Gln, Met, Ile > Val, Pro > Lys(+), Arg, His(0) > Cys, Gly > Phe > Asn, Tyr, His(+). N1 preferences are clearly distinct from preferences for the preceding N-cap and alpha-helix interior. pK(a) values were measured for Asp, Glu, and His, and protonation-free energies were calculated for Asp and Glu. The dissociation of the Asp proton is less favorable than that of Glu, and this reflects its involvement in a stronger stabilizing interaction at the N terminus. Proline is not energetically favored at the alpha-helix N terminus despite having a high propensity for this position in crystal structures. The data presented are of value both in rationalizing mutations at N1 alpha-helix sites in proteins and in predicting the helix contents of peptides.     

Effect of the N2 residue on the stability of the α-helix for all 20 amino acids

N2 is the second position in the alpha-helix. All 20 amino acids were placed in the N2 position of a synthetic helical peptide (CH(3)CO-[AXAAAAKAAAAKAAGY]-NH(2)) and the helix content was measured by circular dichroism spectroscopy at 273K. The dependence of peptide helicity on N2 residue identity has been used to determine a free-energy scale by analysis with a modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory that includes a parameter for the N2 energy (n2). The rank order of DeltaDeltaG((relative to Ala)) is Glu(-), Asp(-) > Ala > Glu(0), Leu, Val, Gln, Thr, Ile, Ser, Met, Asp(0), His(0), Arg, Cys, Lys, Phe > Asn, > Gly, His(+), Pro, Tyr. The results correlate very well with N2 propensities in proteins, moderately well with N1 and helix interior preferences, and not at all with N-cap preferences. The strongest energetic effects result from interactions with the helix dipole, which favors negative charges at the helix N terminus. Hydrogen bonds to side chains at N2, such as Gln, Ser, and Thr, are weak, despite occurring frequently in protein crystal structures, in contrast to the N-cap position. This is because N-cap hydrogen bonds are close to linear, whereas N2 hydrogen bonds have poor geometry. These results can be used to modify protein stability rationally, help design helices, and improve prediction of helix location and stability.     

Structure, stability and folding of the alpha-helix

Pauling first described the alpha-helix nearly 50 years ago, yet new features of its structure continue to be discovered, using peptide model systems, site-directed mutagenesis, advances in theory, the expansion of the Protein Data Bank and new experimental techniques. Helical peptides in solution form a vast number of structures, including fully helical, fully coiled and partly helical. To interpret peptide results quantitatively it is essential to use a helix/coil model that includes the stabilities of all these conformations. Our models now include terms for helix interiors, capping, side-chain interactions, N-termini and 3(10)-helices. The first three amino acids in a helix (N1, N2 and N3) and the preceding N-cap are unique, as their amide NH groups do not participate in backbone hydrogen bonding. We surveyed their structures in proteins and measured their amino acid preferences. The results are predominantly rationalized by hydrogen bonding to the free NH groups. Stabilizing side-chain-side-chain energies, including hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding and polar/non-polar interactions, were measured accurately in helical peptides. Helices in proteins show a preference for having approximately an integral number of turns so that their N- and C-caps lie on the same side. There are also strong periodic trends in the likelihood of terminating a helix with a Schellman or alpha L C-cap motif. The kinetics of alpha-helix folding have been studied with stopped-flow deep ultraviolet circular dichroism using synchrotron radiation as the light source; this gives a far superior signal-to-noise ratio than a conventional instrument. We find that poly(Glu), poly(Lys) and alanine-based peptides fold in milliseconds, with longer peptides showing a transient overshoot in helix content.     

Stable proline box motif at the N-terminal end of alpha-helices.

We describe a novel N-terminal alpha-helix local motif that involves three hydrophobic residues and a Pro residue (Pro-box motif). Database analysis shows that when Pro is the N-cap of an alpha-helix the distribution of amino acids in adjacent positions changes dramatically with respect to the average distribution in an alpha-helix, but not when Pro is at position N1. N-cap Pro residues are usually associated to Ile and Leu, at position N', Val at position N3 and a hydrophobic residue (h) at position N4. The side chain of the N-cap Pro packs against Val, while the hydrophobic residues at positions N' and N4 make favorable interactions. To analyze the role of this putative motif (sequence fingerprint hPXXhh), we have synthesized a series of peptides and analyzed them by circular dichroism (CD) and NMR. We find that this motif is formed in peptides, and that the accompanying hydrophobic interactions contribute up to 1.2 kcal/mol to helix stability. The fact that some of the residues in this fingerprint are not good N-cap and helix formers results in a small overall stabilization of the alpha-helix with respect to other peptides having Gly as the N-cap and Ala at N3 and N4. This suggests that the Pro-box motif will not specially contribute to protein stability but to the specificity of its fold. In fact, 80% of the sequences that contain the fingerprint sequence in the protein database are adopting the described structural motif, and in none of them is the helix extended to place Pro at the more favorable N1 position.     

Effect of the N3 residue on the stability of the alpha-helix

N3 is the third position from the N terminus in the alpha-helix with helical backbone dihedral angles. All 20 amino acids have been placed in the N3 position of a synthetic helical peptide (CH(3)CO-[AAX AAAAKAAAAKAGY]-NH(2)) and the helix content measured by circular dichroism spectroscopy at 273 K. The dependence of peptide helicity on N3 residue identity has been used to determine a free energy scale by analysis with a modified Lifson-Roig helix coil theory that includes a parameter for the N3 energy (n3). The most stabilizing residues at N3 in rank order are Ala, Glu, Met/Ile, Leu, Lys, Ser, Gln, Thr, Tyr, Phe, Asp, His, and Trp. Free energies for the most destabilizing residues (Cys, Gly, Asn, Arg, and Pro) could not be fitted. The results correlate with N1, N2, and helix interior energies and not at all with N-cap preferences. This completes our work on studying the structural and energetic preferences of the amino acids for the N-terminal positions of the alpha-helix. These results can be used to rationally modify protein stability, help design helices, and improve prediction of helix location and stability.     

Helix propagation and N-cap propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine-based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol.

The helix propagation and N-cap propensities of the amino acids have been measured in alanine-based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol (40% TFE) to determine if this helix-stabilizing solvent uniformly affects all amino acids. The propensities in 40% TFE are compared with revised values of the helix parameters of alanine-based peptides in water. Revision of the propensities in water is the result of redefining the capping statistical weights and evaluating the helix nucleation constant with N-capping explicitly included in the helix-coil model. The propagation propensities of all amino acids increase in 40% TFE relative to water, but the increases are highly variable. In water, all beta-branched and beta-substituted amino acids are helix breakers. In 40% TFE, the propagation propensities of the nonpolar amino acids increase greatly, leaving charged and neutral polar, beta-substituted amino acids as helix breakers. Glycine and proline are strong helix breakers in both solvents. Free energy differences for helix propagation (delta delta G) between alanine and other nonpolar amino acids are twice as large in water as predicted from side-chain conformational entropies, but delta delta G values in 40% TFE are close to those predicted from side-chain entropies. This dependence of delta delta G on the solvent points to a specific role of water in determining the relative helix propensities of the nonpolar amino acids. The N-cap propensities converge toward a common value in 40% TFE, suggesting that differential solvation by water contributes to the diversity of N-cap values shown by the amino acids.     

Amino acid pairing at the N- and C-termini of helical segments in proteins

A systematic survey was carried out in an unbiased sample of 815 protein chains with a maximum of 20% homology selected from the Protein Data Bank, whose structures were solved at a resolution higher than 1.6 A and with a R-factor lower than 25%. A set of 5556 subsequences with alpha-helix or 3(10)-helix motifs was extracted from the protein chains considered. Global and local propensities were then calculated for all possible amino acid pairs of the type (i, i + 1), (i, i + 2), (i, i + 3), and (i, i + 4), starting at the relevant helical positions N1, N2, N3, C3, C2, C1, and N-int (interior positions), and also at the first nonhelical positions in both termini of the helices, namely, N-cap and C-cap. The statistical analysis of the propensity values has shown that pairing is significantly dependent on the type of the amino acids and on the position of the pair. A few sequences of three and four amino acids were selected and their high prevalence in helices is outlined in this work. The Glu-Lys-Tyr-Pro sequence shows a peculiar distribution in proteins, which may suggest a relevant structural role in alpha-helices when Pro is located at the C-cap position. A bioinformatics tool was developed, which updates automatically and periodically the results and makes them available in a web site.     

Side-chain structures in the first turn of the alpha-helix

The first three residues at the N terminus of the alpha-helix are called N1, N2 and N3. We surveyed 2102 alpha-helix N termini in 298 high-resolution, non-homologous protein crystal structures for N1, N2 and N3 amino acid and side-chain rotamer propensities and hydrogen-bonding patterns. We find strong structural preferences that are unique to these sites. The rotamer distributions as a function of amino acid identity and position in the helix are often explained in terms of hydrogen-bonding interactions to the free N1, N2 and N3 backbone NH groups. Notably, the "good N2" amino acid residues Gln, Glu, Asp, Asn, Ser, Thr and His preferentially form i, i or i,i+1 hydrogen bonds to the backbone, though this is hindered by good N-caps (Asp, Asn, Ser, Thr and Cys) that compete for these hydrogen bond donors. We find a number of specific side-chain to side-chain interactions between N1 and N2 or between the N-cap and N2 or N3, such as Arg(N-cap) to Asp(N2). The strong energetic and structural preferences found for N1, N2 and N3, which differ greatly from positions within helix interiors, suggest that these sites should be treated explicitly in any consideration of helical structure in peptides or proteins.     

Alpha helix capping in synthetic model peptides by reciprocal side chain–main chain interactions: Evidence for an N terminal “capping box”

A significant fraction of the amino acids in proteins are alpha helical in conformation. Alpha helices in globular proteins are short, with an average length of about twelve residues, so that residues at the ends of helices make up an important fraction of all helical residues. In the middle of a helix, H-bonds connect the NH and CO groups of each residue to partners four residues along the chain. At the ends of a helix, the H-bond potential of the main chain remains unfulfilled, and helix capping interactions involving bonds from polar side chains to the NH or CO of the backbone have been proposed and detected. In a study of synthetic helical peptides, we have found that the sequence Ser-Glu-Asp-Glu stabilizes the alpha helix in a series of helical peptides with consensus sequences. Following the report by Harper and Rose, which identifies SerXaaXaaGlu as a member of a class of common motifs at the N termini of alpha helices in proteins that they refer to as “capping boxes,” we have reexamined the side chain–main chain interactions in a varient sequence using ¹H NMR, and find that the postulated reciprocal side chain-backbone bonding between the first Ser and last Glu side chains and their peptide NH partners can be resolved: Deletion of two residues N terminal to the Ser-Glu-Asp-Glu sequence in these peptides has no effect on the initiation of helical structure, as defined by two-dimensional (2D) NMR experiments on this variant. Thus the capping box sequence Ser-Glu-Asp-Glu inhibits N terminal fraying of the N terminus of alpha helix in these peptides, and shows the side chain–main chain interactions proposed by Harper and Rose. It thus acts as a helix initiating signal. Since normal a helix cannot propagate beyond the N terminus of this structure, the box acts as a termination signal in this direction as well. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Kinetic role of helix caps in protein folding is context-dependent

Secondary structure punctuation through specific backbone and side chain interactions at the beginning and end of alpha-helices has been proposed to play a key role in hierarchical protein folding mechanisms [Baldwin, R. L., and Rose, G. D. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 26-33; Presta, L. G., and Rose, G. D. (1988) Science 240, 1632-1641]. We have made site-specific substitutions in the N- and C-cap motifs of the 5-helix protein monomeric lambda repressor (lambda(6-85)) and have measured the rate constants for folding and unfolding of each variant. The consequences of C-cap changes are strongly context-dependent. When the C-cap was located at the chain terminus, changes had little energetic and no kinetic effect. However, substitutions in a C-cap at the boundary between helix 4 and the subsequent interhelical loop resulted in large changes to the stability and rate constants of the variant, showing a substantial kinetic role for this interior C-cap and suggesting a general kinetic role for interior helix C-caps. Statistical preferences tabulated separately for internal and terminal C-caps also show only weak residue preferences in terminal C-caps. This kinetic distinction between interior and terminal C-caps can explain the discrepancy between the near-absence of stability and kinetic effects seen for C-caps of isolated peptides versus the very strong C-cap effects seen for proteins in statistical sequence preferences and mutational energetics. Introduction of consensus, in-register N-capping motifs resulted in increased stability, accelerated folding, and slower unfolding. The kinetic measurements indicate that some of the new native-state capping interactions remain unformed in the transition state. The accelerated folding rates could result from helix stabilization without invoking a specific role for N-caps in the folding reaction.     

Amino-acid sequence of human alpha 2-antiplasmin

The amino-acid sequence of human alpha 2-antiplasmin was determined by Edman degradation of peptides purified from CNBr, tryptic and chymotryptic digests. Of the total sequence of 452 amino acids of mature alpha 2-antiplasmin, as deduced from the cDNA sequence [Holmes et al. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 1659-1664], 444 residues were identified by amino-acid sequencing. Two differences were found between the peptide and cDNA analyses (Gly instead of Leu at position 10 and Gly instead of Ser at position 369). alpha 2-Antiplasmin contains two disulfide bridges (Cys64-Cys104 and Cys31-Cys113) and four glucosamine-based carbohydrate chains attached to Asn87, Asn256, Asn270 and Asn277. alpha 2-Antiplasmin is homologous with 12 other proteins belonging to the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily.     

Determination of intrinsic hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of amino acid side chains in peptides in the absence of nearest-neighbor or conformational effects

Understanding the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of amino acid side chains in peptides/proteins is one the most important aspects of biology. Though many hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity scales have been generated, an "intrinsic" scale has yet to be achieved. "Intrinsic" implies the maximum possible hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of side chains in the absence of nearest-neighbor or conformational effects that would decrease the full expression of the side-chain hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity when the side chain is in a polypeptide chain. Such a scale is the fundamental starting point for determining the parameters that affect side-chain hydrophobicity and for quantifying such effects in peptides and proteins. A 10-residue peptide sequence, Ac-X-G-A-K-G-A-G-V-G-L-amide, was designed to enable the determination of the intrinsic values, where position X was substituted by all 20 naturally occurring amino acids and norvaline, norleucine, and ornithine. The coefficients were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using six different mobile phase conditions involving different pH values (2, 5, and 7), ion-pairing reagents, and the presence and absence of different salts. The results show that the intrinsic hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of amino acid side chains in peptides (proteins) is independent of pH, buffer conditions, or whether C(8) or C(18) reversed-phase columns were used for 17 side chains (Gly, Ala, Cys, Pro, Val, nVal, Leu, nLeu, Ile, Met, Tyr, Phe, Trp, Ser, Thr, Asn, and Gln) and dependent on pH and buffer conditions, including the type of salt or ion-pairing reagent for potentially charged side chains (Orn, Lys, His, Arg, Asp, and Glu).     

Dissecting the energetics of protein alpha-helix C-cap termination through chemical protein synthesis

The alpha-helix is a fundamental protein structural motif and is frequently terminated by a glycine residue. Explanations for the predominance of glycine at the C-cap terminal portions of alpha-helices have invoked uniquely favorable energetics of this residue in a left-handed conformation or enhanced solvation of the peptide backbone because of the absence of a side chain. Attempts to quantify the contributions of these two effects have been made previously, but the issue remains unresolved. Here we have used chemical protein synthesis to dissect the energetic basis of alpha-helix termination by comparing a series of ubiquitin variants containing an L-amino acid or the corresponding D-amino acid at the C-cap Gly35 position. D-Amino acids can adopt a left-handed conformation without energetic penalty, so the contributions of conformational strain and backbone solvation can thus be separated. Analysis of the thermodynamic data revealed that the preference for glycine at the C' position of a helix is predominantly a conformational effect.     

Role of acidic amino acids in peptide substrates of the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase and rhodopsin kinase.

The beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta-ARK) phosphorylates G protein coupled receptors in an agonist-dependent manner. Since the exact sites of receptor phosphorylation by beta-ARK are poorly defined, the identification of substrate amino acids that are critical to phosphorylation by the kinase are also unknown. In this study, a peptide whose sequence is present in a portion of the third intracellular loop region of the human platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor is shown to serve as a substrate for beta-ARK. Removal of the negatively charged amino acids surrounding a cluster of serines in this alpha 2-peptide resulted in a complete loss of phosphorylation by the kinase. A family of peptides was synthesized to further study the role of acidic amino acids in peptide substrates of beta-ARK. By kinetic analyses of the phosphorylation reactions, beta-ARK exhibited a marked preference for negatively charged amino acids localized to the NH2-terminal side of a serine or threonine residue. While there were no significant differences between glutamic and aspartic acid residues, serine-containing peptides were 4-fold better substrates than threonine. Comparing a variety of kinases, only rhodopsin kinase and casein kinase II exhibited significant phosphorylation of the acidic peptides. Unlike beta-ARK, RK preferred acid residues localized to the carboxyl-terminal side of the serine. A feature common to beta-ARK and RK was a much greater Km for peptide substrates as compared to that for intact receptor substrates.     

Effect of phosphorylation on alpha-helix stability as a function of position

We have investigated the effect of placing phosphoserine at the N-cap, N1, N2, N3, and interior position in alanine-based alpha-helical peptides. Helix contents of each peptide were measured by CD spectroscopy and titrations performed to determine pK(a) values. Data were analyzed with modified Lifson-Roig theory to determine helix-coil parameters (n, n(1), n(2), n(3), and w) and free energy changes for phosphoserine at each helical position. Results are given for a -1 and -2 phosphoserine charge state. Results show that phosphoserine stabilizes at the N-terminal positions by as much as 2.3 kcal.mol(-1), while destabilizes in the helix interior by 1.2 kcal.mol(-1), relative to serine. The rank order of free energies relative to serine at each position is N2 > N3 > N1 > N-cap > interior. Moreover, -2 phosphoserine is the most preferred residue known at each of these N-terminal positions. Experimental pK(a) values for the -1 to -2 phosphoserine transition are in the order N2 < N-cap < N1 < N3 < interior. This order agrees well with electrostatics calculations carried out with phosphoserine at the N-terminal positions and interior positions. Combining these with calculations at the C3, C2, C1, and C-cap positions gives results for phosphoserine along the length of the helix. We see a transition from phosphoserine stabilization at the N-terminus to destabilization at the C-terminus and can explain this in terms of the balance of protein solvation, favorable interactions, and dehydration. These results give insight into the phosphorylatable control of biological systems through positive or negative changes in stability.     

Presence of a helix in human CD4 cytoplasmic domain promotes binding to HIV-1 Nef protein

The Nef proteins of simian and human immunodeficiency viruses are known to directly bind and downregulate the CD4 receptor of infected cells. Recent results suggest that residues forming an alpha-helix N-cap in the CD4 cytoplasmic domain play a role in binding of CD4 to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef protein. We determined the dissociation constants between Nef and several CD4 peptides that contain or do not contain the respective alpha-helix N-cap. Further, we compared helical secondary structure content of these CD4 peptide variants by circular dichroism spectroscopy. We conclude that presence of an alpha-helix in CD4 cytoplasmic domain increases CD4 affinity to Nef. In addition, the amino acid sequence of residues forming the helix N-cap influences CD4 affinity to Nef, too. Finally, the structural changes induced in Nef and CD4 upon binding to each other are investigated.