Glioma Cell Death: Cell–Cell Interactions and Signalling Networks

The prognosis for patients with malignant gliomas is poor, but improvements may emerge from a better understanding of the pathophysiology of glioma signalling. Recent therapeutic developments have implicated lipid signalling in glioma cell death. Stress signalling in glioma cell death involves mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum. Lipid mediators also signal via extrinsic pathways in glioma cell proliferation, migration and interaction with endothelial and microglial cells. Glioma cell death and tumour regression have been reported using polyunsaturated fatty acids in animal models, human ex vivo explants, glioma cell preparations and in clinical case reports involving intratumoral infusion. Cell death signalling was associated with generation of reactive oxygen intermediates and mitochondrial and other signalling pathways. In this review, evidence for mitochondrial responses to stress signals, including polyunsaturated fatty acids, peroxidising agents and calcium is presented. Additionally, evidence for interaction of glioma cells with primary brain endothelial cells is described, modulating human glioma peroxidative signalling. Glioma responses to potential therapeutic agents should be analysed in systems reflecting tumour connectivity and CNS structural and functional integrity. Future insights may also be derived from studies of signalling in glioma-derived tumour stem cells.     

Gap Junction–mediated Cell–Cell Communication Modulates Mouse Neural Crest Migration

Previous studies showed that conotruncal heart malformations can arise with the increase or decrease in α₁ connexin function in neural crest cells. To elucidate the possible basis for the quantitative requirement for α₁ connexin gap junctions in cardiac development, a neural crest outgrowth culture system was used to examine migration of neural crest cells derived from CMV43 transgenic embryos overexpressing α₁ connexins, and from α₁ connexin knockout (KO) mice and FC transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative α₁ connexin fusion protein. These studies showed that the migration rate of cardiac neural crest was increased in the CMV43 embryos, but decreased in the FC transgenic and α₁ connexin KO embryos. Migration changes occurred in step with connexin gene or transgene dosage in the homozygous vs. hemizygous α₁ connexin KO and CMV43 embryos, respectively. Dye coupling analysis in neural crest cells in the outgrowth cultures and also in the living embryos showed an elevation of gap junction communication in the CMV43 transgenic mice, while a reduction was observed in the FC transgenic and α₁ connexin KO mice. Further analysis using oleamide to downregulate gap junction communication in nontransgenic outgrowth cultures showed that this independent method of reducing gap junction communication in cardiac crest cells also resulted in a reduction in the rate of crest migration. To determine the possible relevance of these findings to neural crest migration in vivo, a lacZ transgene was used to visualize the distribution of cardiac neural crest cells in the outflow tract. These studies showed more lacZ-positive cells in the outflow septum in the CMV43 transgenic mice, while a reduction was observed in the α₁ connexin KO mice. Surprisingly, this was accompanied by cell proliferation changes, not in the cardiac neural crest cells, but in the myocardium— an elevation in the CMV43 mice vs. a reduction in the α₁ connexin KO mice. The latter observation suggests that cardiac neural crest cells may have a role in modulating growth and development of non–neural crest– derived tissues. Overall, these findings suggest that gap junction communication mediated by α₁ connexins plays an important role in cardiac neural crest migration. Furthermore, they indicate that cardiac neural crest perturbation is the likely underlying cause for heart defects in mice with the gain or loss of α₁ connexin function.     

Molecular Bases of Cell–Cell Junctions Stability and Dynamics

Epithelial cell–cell junctions are formed by apical adherens junctions (AJs), which are composed of cadherin adhesion molecules interacting in a dynamic way with the cortical actin cytoskeleton. Regulation of cell–cell junction stability and dynamics is crucial to maintain tissue integrity and allow tissue remodeling throughout development. Actin filament turnover and organization are tightly controlled together with myosin-II activity to produce mechanical forces that drive the assembly, maintenance, and remodeling of AJs. In this review, we will discuss these three distinct stages in the lifespan of cell–cell junctions, using several developmental contexts, which illustrate how mechanical forces are generated and transmitted at junctions, and how they impact on the integrity and the remodeling of cell–cell junctions.Cell–cell junction formation and remodeling occur repeatedly throughout development. Epithelial cells are linked by apical adherens junctions (AJs) that rely on the cadherin-catenin-actin module. Cadherins, of which epithelial E-cadherin (E-cad) is the most studied, are Ca²⁺-dependent transmembrane adhesion proteins forming homophilic and heterophilic bonds in trans between adjacent cells. Cadherins and the actin cytoskeleton are mutually interdependent (Jaffe et al. 1990; Matsuzaki et al. 1990; Hirano et al. 1992; Oyama et al. 1994; Angres et al. 1996; Orsulic and Peifer 1996; Adams et al. 1998; Zhang et al. 2005; Pilot et al. 2006). This has long been attributed to direct physical interaction of E-cad with β-catenin (β-cat) and of α-catenin (α-cat) with actin filaments (for reviews, see Gumbiner 2005; Leckband and Prakasam 2006; Pokutta and Weis 2007). Recently, biochemical and protein dynamics analyses have shown that such a link may not exist and that instead, a constant shuttling of α-cat between cadherin/β-cat complexes and actin may be key to explain the dynamic aspect of cell–cell adhesion (Drees et al. 2005; Yamada et al. 2005). Regardless of the exact nature of this link, several studies show that AJs are indeed physically attached to actin and that cadherins transmit cortical forces exerted by junctional acto-myosin networks (Costa et al. 1998; Sako et al. 1998; Pettitt et al. 2003; Dawes-Hoang et al. 2005; Cavey et al. 2008; Martin et al. 2008; Rauzi et al. 2008). In addition, physical association depends in part on α-cat (Cavey et al. 2008) and additional intermediates have been proposed to represent alternative missing links (Abe and Takeichi 2008) (reviewed in Gates and Peifer 2005; Weis and Nelson 2006). Although further work is needed to address the molecular nature of cadherin/actin dynamic interactions, association with actin is crucial all throughout the lifespan of AJs. In this article, we will review our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms at work during three different developmental stages of AJs biology: assembly, stabilization, and remodeling, with special emphasis on the mechanical forces controlling AJs integrity and development.     

The Role of Altered Cell–Cell Communication in Melanoma Progression

Under normal homeostasis, melanocyte growth and behaviour is tightly controlled by the surrounding keratinocytes. Keratinocytes regulate melanocyte behaviour through a complex system of paracrine growth factors and cell-cell adhesion molecules. Pathological changes, leading to development of malignant melanoma, upset this delicate homeostatic balance and can lead to altered expression of cell-cell adhesion and cell-cell communication molecules. In particular, there is a switch from the E-cadherin-mediated keratinocyte-melanocyte partnership to the N-cadherin-mediated melanoma-melanoma and melanoma-fibroblast interaction. Other changes include the alteration in the gap junctions formed between the melanocyte and keratinocyte. Changes in the connexin expression, in particular the loss of connexin 43, may result in a reduction or a loss of gap junctional activity, which is thought to contribute towards tumour progression. In the current review we describe the alterations in cell-cell adhesion and communication associated with melanoma development and progression, and discuss how a greater understanding of these processes may aid the future therapy of this disease.     

Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (Ep-CAM) Modulates Cell–Cell Interactions Mediated by Classic Cadherins

The contribution of noncadherin-type, Ca²⁺-independent cell–cell adhesion molecules to the organization of epithelial tissues is, as yet, unclear. A homophilic, epithelial Ca²⁺-independent adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM) is expressed in most epithelia, benign or malignant proliferative lesions, or during embryogenesis. Here we demonstrate that ectopic Ep-CAM, when expressed in cells interconnected by classic cadherins (E- or N-cadherin), induces segregation of the transfectants from the parental cell type in coaggregation assays and in cultured mixed aggregates, respectively. In the latter assay, Ep-CAM–positive transfectants behave like cells with a decreased strength of cell–cell adhesion as compared to the parental cells. Using transfectants with an inducible Ep-CAM–cDNA construct, we demonstrate that increasing expression of Ep-CAM in cadherin-positive cells leads to the gradual abrogation of adherens junctions. Overexpression of Ep-CAM has no influence on the total amount of cellular cadherin, but affects the interaction of cadherins with the cytoskeleton since a substantial decrease in the detergent-insoluble fraction of cadherin molecules was observed. Similarly, the detergent-insoluble fractions of α- and β-catenins decreased in cells overexpressing Ep-CAM. While the total β-catenin content remains unchanged, a reduction in total cellular α-catenin is observed as Ep-CAM expression increases. As the cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesions diminish, Ep-CAM–mediated intercellular connections become predominant. An adhesion-defective mutant of Ep-CAM lacking the cytoplasmic domain has no effect on the cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesions. The ability of Ep-CAM to modulate the cadherin-mediated cell–cell interactions, as demonstrated in the present study, suggests a role for this molecule in development of the proliferative, and probably malignant, phenotype of epithelial cells, since an increase of Ep-CAM expression was observed in vivo in association with hyperplastic and malignant proliferation of epithelial cells.Tissue and organ morphogenesis can be viewed as the result of interactions of various cell populations. One important type of intercellular interaction involved in the processes of tissue morphogenesis, morphogenetic movements of cells, and segregation of cell types, are adhesions mediated by cell adhesion molecules (Steinberg and Pool, 1982; Edelman, 1986; Cunningham, 1995; Takeichi, 1995; Gumbiner, 1996). Except for their direct mechanical role as interconnectors of cells and connectors of cells to substrates, cell adhesion molecules are also believed to be responsible for a variety of dynamic processes including cell locomotion, proliferation, and differentiation. There is also evidence that the adhesion systems within a cell may act as regulators of other cell adhesions, thereby offering a means of signaling that is relevant for rearrangements in cell or tissue organization (Edelman, 1993; Rosales et al., 1995; Gumbiner, 1996).In many tissues, a critical role in the maintenance of multicellular structures is assigned to cadherins, a family of Ca²⁺-dependent, homophilic cell–cell adhesion molecules (Takeichi, 1991, 1995; Gumbiner, 1996). In epithelia this critical role belongs to E-cadherin, which is crucial for the establishment and maintenance of epithelial cell polarity (McNeil et al., 1990; Näthke et al., 1993), morphogenesis of epithelial tissues (Wheelock and Jensen, 1992; Larue et al., 1996), and regulation of cell proliferation and programmed cell death (Hermiston and Gordon, 1995; Hermiston et al., 1996; Takahashi and Suzuki, 1996; Wilding et al., 1996; Zhu and Watt, 1996). Expression of different types of classic cadherin molecules (Nose et al., 1988; Friedlander et al., 1989; Daniel et al., 1995), and even quantitative differences in the levels of the same type of cadherin (Steinberg and Takeichi, 1994), may be responsible for segregation of cell types in epithelial tissues. The phenotype of epithelial cells may be modulated by expression of combinations of different types of cadherins (Marrs et al., 1995; Islam et al., 1996). However, cadherins represent only one of the intercellular adhesion systems that are present in epithelia, along with adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (Benchimol et al., 1989), and others. The actual contribution of Ca²⁺-independent nonjunctional adhesion molecules to the formation and maintenance of the epithelial tissue architecture and epithelial cell morphology is not clear.We have recently demonstrated that a 40-kD epithelial glycoprotein, which we have designated epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM)¹ (Litvinov et al., 1994a ), may perform as a homophilic, Ca²⁺-independent intercellular adhesion molecule, capable of mediating cell aggregation, preventing cell scattering, and directing cell segregation. This type I transmembrane glycoprotein consists of two EGF-like domains followed by a cysteine-poor region, a transmembrane domain, and a short (26-amino acid) cytoplasmic tail, and is not structurally related to the four major types of CAMs, such as cadherins, integrins, selectins, and the immunoglobulin superfamily (for review see Litvinov, 1995). Ep-CAM demonstrates adhesion properties when introduced into cell systems that are deficient in intercellular adhesive interactions (Litvinov et al., 1994a ). However, the participation of the Ep-CAM molecule in supporting cell–cell interactions of epithelial cells was not evident (Litvinov et al., 1994b ).Most epithelial cell types coexpress E-cadherin (and sometimes other classic cadherins) and Ep-CAM (for review see Litvinov, 1995) during some stage of embryogenesis. In adult squamous epithelia, which are Ep-CAM negative, de novo expression of this molecule is associated with metaplastic or neoplastic changes. Thus, in ectocervical epithelia, expression of Ep-CAM occurs in early preneoplastic lesions (Litvinov et al., 1996); most squamous carcinomas of the head and neck region are Ep-CAM positive (Quak et al., 1990), and basal cell carcinomas are Ep-CAM positive in contrast to the normal epidermis (Tsubura et al., 1992).In many tumors that express Ep-CAM heterogeneously, an Ep-CAM–positive cell population may be found within an Ep-CAM–negative cell population, with both cell types expressing approximately equal levels of cadherins, as illustrated in Fig. ​Fig.11 A by a case of basal cell carcinoma. In glandular tissues such as gastric epithelium, which are low/ negative for Ep-CAM, expression of Ep-CAM is related to the development of early stages of intestinal metaplasia (our unpublished observation). Even in tissues with relatively high Ep-CAM expression, such as colon, the development of polyps is accompanied by an increase in Ep-CAM expression (Salem et al., 1993). In intestinal metaplasia one may observe Ep-CAM–positive cells bordering morphologically identical normal cells that are Ep-CAM–negative (as illustrated in Fig. ​Fig.11 B) Ep-CAM–positive cells bordering Ep-CAM–negative epithelial cells may also be found in some normal tissues such as hair follicles (Tsubura et al., 1992). Open in a separate windowFigure 1Examples of Ep-CAM expression by some cells within the E-cadherin–positive cell population. (A) Heterogeneous expression of Ep-CAM in a basal cell carcinoma, as detected by immunofluorescent staining with mAb 323/A3 to Ep-CAM (green fluorescence); the red fluorescence indicates the expression of E-cadherin (mAb HECD-1). (B) The de novo expression of Ep-CAM in gastric mucosa in relation to the development of intestinal metaplasia; immunohistochemical staining with mAb 323/A3. Note the bordering Ep-CAM–positive and –negative cells. Bars, 30 μM.From the examples presented, an increased or de novo expression of Ep-CAM is often observed in epithelial tissues in vivo. Expression of an additional molecule that may participate in cell adhesion in the context of other adhesion systems may have certain effects on the cell–cell interactions. Therefore, we have investigated whether the increased/de novo expression of Ep-CAM in epithelial cells (a) has any impact on interactions of positive cells with the parental Ep-CAM–negative cells, and (b) modulates in any way intercellular adhesive interactions of cells interconnected by E-cadherin, which is the major morphoregulatory molecule in epithelia.Here we demonstrate that expression of Ep-CAM by some cells in a mixed cell population expressing classical cadherins induces segregation of the Ep-CAM–positive cells from the parental cell population due to a negative effect on cadherin junctions caused by expression of Ep-CAM. The cadherin-modulating properties observed for Ep-CAM suggest a role for this molecule in the development of a proliferative and metaplastic cell phenotype, and probably in the development and progression of malignancies.     

IGF-I Receptor, Cell–Cell Adhesion, Tumour Development and Progression

The insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) has been implicated in the development and progression of many common cancers and other neoplastic diseases. The tumorigenic potential of IGF-IR relies on its antiapoptotic and transforming activities. The molecular mechanisms by which IGF-IR controls the proliferation and survival of tumour cells have been extensively studied and many pathways have been delineated. However, the role of IGF-IR in the regulation of non-mitogenic cell functions is less well understood. Here we focus on IGF-IR-dependent cell-cell adhesion. Limited studies suggested that IGF-IR can regulate cell aggregation and intercellular adhesion mediated by cadherins and cadherin-associated proteins. We review the mechanisms of this process and discuss the impact of IGF-IR-dependent cell-cell adhesion on the phenotype of tumour cells.     

Cell–scaffold interaction within engineered tissue

The structure of a tissue engineering scaffold plays an important role in modulating tissue growth. A novel gelatin–chitosan (Gel–Cs) scaffold with a unique structure produced by three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology combining with vacuum freeze-drying has been developed for tissue-engineering applications. The scaffold composed of overall construction, micro-pore, surface morphology, and effective mechanical property. Such a structure meets the essential design criteria of an ideal engineered scaffold. The favorable cell–matrix interaction supports the active biocompatibility of the structure. The structure is capable of supporting cell attachment and proliferation. Cells seeded into this structure tend to maintain phenotypic shape and secreted large amounts of extracellular matrix (ECM) and the cell growth decreased the mechanical properties of scaffold. This novel biodegradable scaffold has potential applications for tissue engineering based upon its unique structure, which acts to support cell growth.     

Membrane Domains Based on Ankyrin and Spectrin Associated with Cell–Cell Interactions

Nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segments of myelinated nerves, sites of cell–cell contact in early embryos and epithelial cells, and neuromuscular junctions of skeletal muscle all perform physiological functions that depend on clustering of functionally related but structurally diverse ion transporters and cell adhesion molecules within microdomains of the plasma membrane. These specialized cell surface domains appeared at different times in metazoan evolution, involve a variety of cell types, and are populated by distinct membrane-spanning proteins. Nevertheless, recent work has shown that these domains all share on their cytoplasmic surfaces a membrane skeleton comprised of members of the ankyrin and spectrin families. This review will summarize basic features of ankyrins and spectrins, and will discuss emerging evidence that these proteins are key players in a conserved mechanism responsible for assembly and maintenance of physiologically important domains on the surfaces of diverse cells.Spectrins are flexible rods 0.2 microns in length with actin-binding sites at each end (Shotton et al. 1979; Bennett et al. 1982) (Fig. 1A). Spectrins are assembled from α and β subunits, each comprised primarily of multiple copies of a 106-amino acid repeat (Speicher and Marchesi 1984). In addition to the canonical 106-residue repeat, β spectrins also have a carboxy-terminal pleckstrin homology domain (Zhang et al. 1995; Macias et al. 1994) and tandem amino-terminal calponin homology domains (Bañuelos et al. 1998), whereas α spectrins contain an Src homology domain 3 (SH3) site (Musacchio et al. 1992), a calmodulin-binding site (Simonovic et al. 2006), and EF hands (Travé et al. 1995) (Fig. 1A). Spectrin α and β subunits are assembled antiparallel and side-to-side into heterodimers, which in turn are associated head-to-head to form tetramers (Clarke 1971; Shotton et al. 1979; Davis and Bennett 1983) (Fig. 1A). In human erythrocytes, in which spectrin was first characterized (Marchesi and Steers 1968; Clarke 1971), actin oligomers containing 10–14 monomers are each linked to five to six spectrin tetramers by accessory proteins to form a geodesic domelike structure that has been resolved by electron microscopy (Byers and Branton 1985). The principal proteins at the spectrin–actin junction are protein 4.1, adducin, tropomyosin, tropomodulin, and dematin (Bennett and Baines 2001) (Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Domain structure and variants of spectrin and ankyrin proteins. (A) Molecular domains of spectrins: Two α spectrins and five β spectrins are shown. Spectrins are comprised of modular units called spectrin repeats (yellow). Other domains such as the ankyrin binding domain (purple), Src-homology domain 3 (SH3, blue), EF-hand domain (red), and calmodulin-binding domain (green) promote interactions with binding targets important for spectrin function. The pleckstrin homology domain (black) promotes association with the plasma membrane and the actin binding domain (grey) tethers the spectrin-based membrane skeleton to the underlying actin cytoskeleton. (B) The spectrin tetramer, the fundamental unit of the spectrin-based membrane skeleton. The spectrin repeat domains of α and β spectrin associate end-to-end to form heterodimers. Heterodimers associate laterally in an antiparallel fashion to form tetramers. The tetramers can then associate end-to-end to form extended macromolecules that link into a geodesic dome shape directly underneath the plasma membrane. (C) Molecular domains present in canonical ankyrins. The membrane binding domain of ankyrin isoforms (orange) is comprised of 24 ANK repeats. The spectrin binding domain (green-blue) allows ankyrins to coordinate integral membrane proteins to the membrane skeleton. The death domain (pink) is the most highly conserved domain. The regulatory domain (brown) is the most variable region of ankyrins. The regulatory domain interacts intramolecularly with the membrane binding domain to modulate ankyrin’s affinity for other binding partners. All ankyrins and spectrins are subject to alternative splicing, which further increases their functional diversity.

Table 1.

Binding partners of spectrin and ankyrins

Autophagy during Early Virus–Host Cell Interactions

Autophagy refers to the conserved, multi-step mechanism that delivers cytosolic cargoes to vesicles of the endo-lysosomal system for degradation. It maintains cellular homeostasis by ensuring the continuous degradation of misformed/senescent intracellular components and the associated recycling of nutrients. Autophagy also represents an important cell-intrinsic defense mechanism against invasion by intracellular pathogens, including viruses. Autophagy might oppose viral invasion by targeting viral particles or viral components for degradation. It can also promote the interaction of viral constituents with receptors specialized in the activation of innate immunity pathways or facilitate the activation of anti-viral adaptive immunity. In response to such pressures, viruses have evolved various sophisticated strategies to avoid anti-viral autophagic responses or to manipulate the autophagic machinery to promote their own replication. This review focuses on our current knowledge of autophagy-related events that take place at early stages during interaction of viruses with host cells as well as on their associated consequences in terms of virus replication and cell fate.     

Cell–cell communication in Arabidopsis early embryogenesis

The basic body plan of the adult plant is established during embryogenesis, resulting in the juvenile form of the seedling. Arabidopsis embryogenesis is distinguished by a highly regular pattern of cell divisions. Some of these divisions are asymmetric, generating daughter cells with different fates. However, their subsequent differentiation might still depend on cell–cell communication to be fully accomplished or maintained. In some cases, cell fate specification solely depends on cell–cell communication that in general plays an important role in the generation of positional information within the embryo. Although auxin-dependent signalling has received much attention, other ways of cell–cell communication have also been demonstrated or suggested. This review focuses on aspects of pattern formation and cell–cell communication during Arabidopsis embryogenesis up to the mid-globular stage of development.     

Cell–cell Signaling in the Neurovascular Unit

Historically, the neuron has been the conceptual focus for almost all of neuroscience research. In recent years, however, the concept of the neurovascular unit has emerged as a new paradigm for investigating both physiology and pathology in the CNS. This concept proposes that a purely neurocentric focus is not sufficient, and emphasizes that all cell types in the brain including neuronal, glial and vascular components, must be examined in an integrated context. Cell–cell signaling and coupling between these different compartments form the basis for normal function. Disordered signaling and perturbed coupling form the basis for dysfunction and disease. In this mini-review, we will survey four examples of this phenomenon: hemodynamic neurovascular coupling linking blood flow to brain activity; cellular communications that evoke the blood–brain barrier phenotype; parallel systems that underlie both neurogenesis and angiogenesis in the CNS; and finally, the potential exchange of trophic factors that may link neuronal, glial and vascular homeostasis. Special issue in honor of Naren Banik.     

Developmental and Stress-Induced Remodeling of Cell–Cell Communication in the Adrenal Medullary Tissue

The adrenal medullary tissue contributes to maintain body homeostasis in reaction to stressful environmental changes via the release of catecholamines into the blood circulation in response to splanchnic nerve activation. Accordingly, chromaffin cell stimulus-secretion coupling undergoes temporally restricted periods of anatomo-functional remodeling in response to prevailing hormonal requirements of the organism. The postnatal development of the adrenal medulla and response to stress are remarkable physiological situations in which the stimulus-secretion coupling is critically affected. Catecholamine secretion from rat chromaffin cells is under a dual control involving an incoming initial command arising from the sympathetic nervous system that releases acetylcholine at the splanchnic nerve terminal-chromaffin cell synapses and a local gap junction-mediated intercellular communication. Interestingly, these two communication pathways are functionally interconnected within the gland and exhibit coordinated plasticity mechanisms. This article reviews the physiological and molecular evidence that the adrenal medullary tissue displays anatomical and functional adaptative remodeling of cell–cell communications upon physiological (postnatal development) and/or physiopathological (stress) situations associated with specific needs in circulating catecholamine levels.     

Assembly of the Murine Leukemia Virus Is Directed towards Sites of Cell–Cell Contact

We have investigated the underlying mechanism by which direct cell–cell contact enhances the efficiency of cell-to-cell transmission of retroviruses. Applying 4D imaging to a model retrovirus, the murine leukemia virus, we directly monitor and quantify sequential assembly, release, and transmission events for individual viral particles as they happen in living cells. We demonstrate that de novo assembly is highly polarized towards zones of cell–cell contact. Viruses assembled approximately 10-fold more frequently at zones of cell contact with no change in assembly kinetics. Gag proteins were drawn to adhesive zones formed by viral Env glycoprotein and its cognate receptor to promote virus assembly at cell–cell contact. This process was dependent on the cytoplasmic tail of viral Env. Env lacking the cytoplasmic tail while still allowing for contact formation, failed to direct virus assembly towards contact sites. Our data describe a novel role for the viral Env glycoprotein in establishing cell–cell adhesion and polarization of assembly prior to becoming a fusion protein to allow virus entry into cells.