The role of reduction mammaplasty in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects

The management of breast tumors in women with macromastia can be challenging. Reconstructive options are limited and breast conservation therapy is often not indicated or results in poor cosmetic outcomes. The purpose of this report was to present a series of women with macromastia who underwent simultaneous reconstruction of a partial mastectomy defect with bilateral reduction mammaplasty. A retrospective review was performed and included all women who underwent partial mastectomy with simultaneous reduction mammaplasty. Data points included patient demographics, preoperative assessment, operative intervention, adjuvant treatment, and outcomes. Twenty women were included in the series (mean age, 43 years; range, 11 to 72 years) with an average body mass index of 32.6 (range, 24.9 to 44.1). Tissue diagnosis was ductal carcinoma (n = 8), ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 6), fibroadenoma (n = 4), and benign breast tissue (n = 2). The various reduction mammaplasty techniques were documented with regard to tumor size and location. The superior medial and inferior pedicles seemed to be the most versatile techniques. One patient required completion mastectomy with autologous tissue reconstruction given positive margins. All patients were disease-free at follow-up (mean, 23 months) and postoperative cancer surveillance was not impaired by the combined procedures. The versatility of reduction mammaplasty allows this procedure to be performed in conjunction with partial mastectomy for any tumor location. Combining these procedures in patients with macromastia provides numerous therapeutic benefits at low cost, while reducing breast distortion and preserving symmetry.     

Improving safety and aesthetic results in inverted T scar breast reduction

Breast reduction using an inverted T scar skin design and a variety of glandular pedicle types is widely practiced and is the standard by which more recent limited scar techniques are judged. The inverted T procedures are attractive because they are predictable and versatile and permit great control over both the extent of reduction and the breast-shaping process. Despite these advantages, common criticisms of inverted T scar techniques include breast shape abnormalities, areolar malposition, hypertrophic scars, and poor long-term projection. Preoperative markings influence both safety and aesthetics. A method of skin marking that is based on a displacement method to determine vertical limb splay angle is described. This design concept must be modified to address certain variants, such as macromastia presenting with normal nipple position or large-diameter areolae, moderately severe macromastia, and macromastia involving radiated breasts. Safety in breast reduction is improved by paying attention to patient positioning issues, using techniques that minimize blood loss, raising flaps of appropriate thickness in the correct plane, and performing resection by observing the principles that reduce the risk of compromise of nipple and areolar circulation. Aesthetic results are improved by analyzing vertical breast meridian lengths during final breast shaping, modifying areolar shape as necessary, and carefully tailoring the medial inframammary crease. The latter is also important for minimizing the potential for scar hypertrophy. The principles presented have been refined during the course of a 12-year experience with several hundred breast reduction procedures. They contribute to improved results in inverted T scar breast reduction when practiced consistently.     

Cosmetic medicine: facial resurfacing and injectables

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the most common options available for minimally invasive facial rejuvenation. 2. Identify key elements essential to each treatment option. 3. Know how to avoid and manage complications for these procedures. SUMMARY: Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures continue to increase in popularity. This article is intended to provide a broad and practical overview of common minimally invasive cosmetic techniques available to the plastic surgeon.     

Evaluation of breast sensibility using dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials

This study was undertaken to prospectively evaluate breast sensibility before and after reduction mammaplasty with a new, objective, and quantitative neurophysiologic method based on the anatomic knowledge of breast innervation and the congruent areas of dermatomal maps. An innovative application of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials was used to study the breast regions of 42 healthy women, bilaterally. The areas stimulated in each breast were the superior quadrant, the nipple-areola complex and the medial and lateral quadrants, and the inferior quadrant; these areas correspond to T3, T4, and T5 dermatomes, respectively, following the accepted concepts of segmentary innervation of the skin. The two groups of 21 patients each were formed according to breast size: group I comprised small-breasted, unoperated controls (brassiere cup size A or B); group II comprised macromastia patients (brassiere cup size C or greater) who presented to a general plastic surgery department for breast reduction surgery. First the authors established the normal range of latency and amplitude in the dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials for the five areas stimulated in patients with small breasts and compared these parameters with those obtained from patients with macromastia. Then, after the macromastia patients underwent reduction mammaplasty using the McKissock technique, the authors compared the postoperative sensory values with their own preoperative values and with those from the small-breasted group. Using dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials, they found that small breasts were statistically more sensitive than large breasts, which concurs with studies in the literature that use other methods to evaluate breast sensibility. They also found that after breast reduction, the macromastia patients presented statistically significant improvement in breast sensibility in relation to their own preoperative latency and amplitude values, with no statistical difference in amplitude with respect to the small-breasted group; this finding suggests that after breast reduction, sensibility similar to that of the small-breasted group can be considered a possibility. Furthermore, in comparisons of each of the five areas stimulated, there was no significant difference in values within the small-breasted group or within the macromastia group before or after surgery; this supports a possible overlap between adjacent dermatomes. This innovative application of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials is an objective, quantitative, and noninvasive method that has allowed the authors to evaluate breast sensibility and to compare postsurgical sensory outcomes.     

Face lift

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify and describe the anatomy of and changes to the aging face, including changes in bone mass and structure and changes to the skin, tissue, and muscles. 2. Assess each individual's unique anatomy before embarking on face-lift surgery and incorporate various surgical techniques, including fat grafting and other corrective procedures in addition to shifting existing fat to a higher position on the face, into discussions with patients. 3. Identify risk factors and potential complications in prospective patients. 4. Describe the benefits and risks of various techniques. SUMMARY: The ability to surgically rejuvenate the aging face has progressed in parallel with plastic surgeons' understanding of facial anatomy. In turn, a more clear explanation now exists for the visible changes seen in the aging face. This article and its associated video content review the current understanding of facial anatomy as it relates to facial aging. The standard face-lift techniques are explained and their various features, both good and bad, are reviewed. The objective is for surgeons to make a better aesthetic diagnosis before embarking on face-lift surgery, and to have the ability to use the appropriate technique depending on the clinical situation.     

Current trends in breast reduction

Results of our study describe the long term effects of reduction mammaplasty. Many women with excessively small or large breasts have an altered personal self-image and often suffer from low self-esteem and other psychological stresses. This procedure is designed to reduce and reshape large breasts, and since the size, shape, and symmetry of a woman's breasts can have a profound effect on her mental and physical well-being it is important to observe the patient's long-term outcome. Currently, breast reduction surgery is safe, effective and beneficial to the patient. In Croatia, reduction mammoplasty is often excluded from the general health care plan. The distinction between "reconstructive" versus "cosmetic" breast surgery is very well defined by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Board of Directors. Unfortunately, the Croatian Health Society has yet to standardize such a distinction. There is an imperative need for evidence-based selection criteria. We retrospectively analyzed data of 59 female patients suffering from symptomatic macromastia who underwent reduction mammaplasty over a 16 year period (1995 until 2011). Our aim was to compare and contrast the various techniques available for reduction mammaplasty and to determine, based on patient outcome and satisfaction, which technique is most suited for each patient. The results of our study generally reinforce the observation that reduction mammaplasty significantly provides improvements in health status, long-term quality of life, postsurgical breast appearance and significantly decrease physical symptoms of pain. A number of 59 consecutive cases were initially treated with the four different breast reduction techniques: inverted-T scat or Wisa pattern breast reduction, vertical reduction mammaplasty, simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty, inferior pedicle and free nipple graft techniques. The average clinical follow-up period was 6-months, and included 48 patients. The statistical analysis of the postoperative patient complications revealed a significant positive relationship in regards to smoking. The majority of these complications were wound related, with no significant relationship between patient complications and variables such as age, BMI, ASA score, resection weight of breast parenchyma, nipple elevation, duration of surgery, and type of pedicle. The higher number of complication correlated with a lower volume of parenchyma resection (rho=-0.321). Overall satisfaction with the new breast size (79%), appearance of the postoperative scars (87%), overall cosmetic outcome score (91%), overall outcome (100%), psychosocial outcome (46%), sexual outcome (85%), physical outcome (88%), satisfaction with preoperative information data (92%), and finally satisfaction with overall care process (96%) was calculated. As expected, the physical symptoms disappeared or were minimized in 88% of patients. Each method of breast reduction has its advantages and disadvantages. The surgeon should evaluate each patient's desires on the basis of her physical presentation. Breast reduction surgery increases the overall personal and social health; not only for the patient, but for their family and friends as well. It is an imperative that every surgeon is aware of this, in order to provide the highest level of care and quality to their patients.     

Breast deformities and mastopexy

LEARNING OBJECTIONS: After reviewing this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Appreciate the diversity of approaches for the correction of breast deformities and mastopexy. 2. Review the salient literature. 3. Understand patient selection criteria and indications. SUMMARY: Breast deformities and mastopexy continue to challenge plastic surgeons. Deformities such as Poland syndrome, tuberous breast, gynecomastia, and other congenital conditions are uncommon; therefore, management experience is often limited. Various techniques have been described, with no general consensus regarding optimal management. Mastopexy has become more common and is performed both with and without augmentation mammaplasty. However, a variety of techniques are available, and a thorough understanding of the indications, patient selection criteria, and techniques is important to optimize outcomes. This article will review these and other conditions to provide a better understanding of the current available data and evidence for these operations.     

Reconstruction of the cheek

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the cheek unit and its specific requirements for quality, outline, and contour. 2. Identify factors involving the patient, wound, and donor materials that determine technique. 3. Understand the application of anteriorly based, posteriorly based, and advancement flaps, and the use of serial excisions for specific defects. 4. Identify, prevent, and treat complications of cheek reconstruction.     

Secondary reduction mammaplasty: is using a different pedicle safe?

Reduction mammaplasty is a frequently performed procedure and one with consistent patient satisfaction. Few patients present for revisional procedures, and even fewer present for a secondary or repeated reduction mammaplasty. This study defines secondary reduction mammaplasty as performing an additional reduction using a pedicled nipple-areola complex. Few reports of secondary reduction are found in the literature. Operative guidelines for secondary reduction mammaplasty have been published recently. However, the experience of others has differed from these guidelines, and herein is presented another experience with secondary reduction mammaplasty. Ten cases of secondary reduction over a 37-year period were identified and reviewed. The initial reductions were performed using six different techniques. An average of 307 g of tissue per breast (range, 130 to 552 g) was removed at the initial operations. The secondary reductions were performed using four different techniques, and an average of 458 g of tissue per breast (range, 147 to 700 g) was removed at the secondary operations. Three of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reduction with the same technique. An average of 4 years (range, 1 to 10 years) separated these surgeries. Seven of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reductions with different technique. An average of 15 years (range, 5 to 19 years) separated these procedures. There was an average 5-year follow-up (range, 1 to 20 years) in this series. Four of the 10 patients experienced self-limiting complications after secondary reduction, including delay in wound healing, delay in the return of nipple sensitivity, and mild fat necrosis. Three of the four patients with complications had undergone secondary reduction with a different pedicle technique. No significant or long-lasting skin, pedicle, or nipple-areola complex compromise was found after secondary reduction mammaplasty. In contrast to the recently published guidelines, this study demonstrates that secondary reduction mammaplasty is a safe and viable option when performed with either similar or different technique. This finding allows secondary reduction mammaplasty to be tailored to the individual breast type and to the abilities of the specific surgeon.     

Occult breast carcinoma in reduction mammaplasty specimens: 14-year experience

Reduction mammaplasty is commonly performed for bilateral macromastia, congenital asymmetry, or as a contralateral symmetry procedure in breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer. Occult carcinoma has been detected in 0.06 percent to 0.4 percent of breast reduction specimens. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of breast cancer in breast reductions performed in one institution over a 14-year period. The authors reviewed their experience with 800 reduction mammaplasties performed between 1988 and 2001. Six cancers were detected (0.8 percent). Of these cancers, three were invasive (0.4 percent) and three were ductal carcinoma in situ (0.4 percent). Stratified by indication for surgery, there was a trend toward higher detection rates in the reconstruction group (1.2 percent) compared with the macromastia (0.7 percent) or congenital asymmetry (0 percent) groups. Mammography was performed preoperatively in these patients and all results were negative for masses or suspicious microcalcification. Pathological diagnosis was guided by gross specimen evaluation in two patients and specimen radiography in one patient. Reduction mammaplasty has a small but definite risk of finding cancer in the resection specimen.     

Otoplasty: sequencing the operation for improved results

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the anatomy and embryology of the external ear. 2. Understand the anatomic causes of the prominent ear. 3. Understand the operative maneuvers used to shape the external ear. 4. Be able to sequence the otoplasty for consistent results. 5. Understand the possible complications of the otoplasty procedure. Correction of prominent ears is a common plastic surgical procedure. Proper execution of the surgical techniques is dependent on the surgeon's understanding of the surgical procedure. This understanding is best founded on an understanding of the historical bases for the operative steps and the execution of these operative steps in a logical fashion. This article describes the concept of sequencing the operation of otoplasty to produce predictable results combining the technical contributions from many authors. The historical, embryological, and anatomic bases for the operation are also discussed. Finally, the authors' preferred techniques are presented. Sequencing the steps in the preoperative assessment, preoperative planning, patient management, operative technique, and postoperative care will produce reproducible results for the attentive surgeon. Careful attention to the details of the operation of otoplasty will avoid many postoperative problems.     

Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique

In reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique, the dermal-breast pedicle can be manipulated to form a central breast mound and enhance breast projection. When this technique is applied both to macromastia and breast asymmetry, excellent early results are reported. To study the effects of time on breast reduction, 22 patients were followed for an average of 4.7 years. Contour of the breast mound and projection are well preserved. However, evaluation of long-term results reveals a gradual increase in the inframammary fold to inferior areola distance. Since no increase in the midclavicle to nipple distance is observed, inferior migration of the breast parenchyma and superior displacement of the nipple-areola with respect to the breast mound occur after reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique.     

Trunk, abdomen, and pressure sore reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the principles of wound closure, torso reconstruction, and pressure sore reconstruction. 2. Outline standard options to treat defects of the chest, abdomen, and back and pressure ulcers in all anatomical areas. 3. Manage and prevent pressure ulcers. SUMMARY: Chest wall reconstruction is indicated following tumor resection, radiation wound breakdown, or intrathoracic sepsis. Principles of wound closure and chest wall stabilization, where indicated, are discussed. Principles of abdominal wall reconstruction continue to evolve with the introduction of newer bioprosthetics and the application of functional concepts for wound closure. The authors illustrate these principles using commonly encountered clinical scenarios and guidelines to achieve predictable results. Pressure ulcers continue to be devastating complications to patients' health and a functional hazard when they occur in the bedridden, in patients with spinal cord injuries, and in patients with neuromuscular disease. Management of pressure ulcers is also very expensive. The authors describe standard options to treat defects of the chest, abdomen, and back and pressure ulcers in all anatomical areas. A comprehensive understanding of principles and techniques will allow practitioners to approach difficult issues of torso reconstruction and pressure sores with a rational confidence and an expectation of generally satisfactory outcomes. With pressure ulcers, prevention remains the primary goal. Patient education and compliance coupled with a multidisciplinary team approach can reduce their occurrence significantly. Surgical management includes appropriate patient selection, adequate débridement, soft-tissue coverage, and use of flaps that will not limit future reconstructions if needed. Postoperatively, a strict protocol should be adapted to ensure the success of the flap procedure. Several myocutaneous flaps commonly used for the surgical management of pressure are discussed. Commonly used flaps in chest and abdominal wall reconstruction are discussed and these should be useful for the practicing plastic surgeon.     

Rhinoplasty

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss desired preoperative aesthetic and functional assessment of the postsurgical nose with rhinoplasty patients. 2. Identify factors that have the potential to affect procedural outcomes. 3. Develop an operative plan to address aesthetic goals while preserving/improving nasal airway function. 4. Recognize and manage complications following rhinoplasty. SUMMARY: Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures in plastic surgery. Over the past 20 years, the trend has shifted away from ablative techniques involving reduction or division of the osseocartilaginous framework to conserving native anatomy with cartilage-sparing suture techniques and augmentation of deficient areas to correct contour deformities and restore structural support. Accurate preoperative systematic nasal analysis and evaluation of the nasal airway, along with identification of both the patient's expectations and the surgeon's goals, form the foundation for success. Intraoperatively, adequate anatomical exposure of the nasal deformity; preservation and restoration of the normal anatomy; correction of the deformity using incremental control, maintenance, and restoration of the nasal airway; and recognition of the dynamic interplays among the composite of maneuvers are required. During postoperative recovery, care and reassurance combined with an ability to recognize and manage complications lead to successful outcomes following rhinoplasty.     

The changing role of platysma in face lifting

Since the 1970s, surgical procedures on platysma muscle, aiming to achieve better results in face lifting, became popular and turned out to be an important surgical step for the plastic surgeon. Many plastic surgeons have contributed to the topic throughout these years, as several articles on the subject have been published. Articles dealing with platysma muscle still bring great interest among plastic surgeons. My concern with platysma muscle began in the mid-1970s and since then has grown continuously. I have steadily been studying the importance of the platysma muscle in the surgeries for facial rejuvenation, involving its anatomy, the techniques proposed, the results obtained, the recommendations for the best surgical procedure for each patient, and the complications. My experience and studies regarding platysma muscle, and the contributions I have brought into this field, are thoroughly described and discussed in this article.     

Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify the skeletal changes in the cleft patient that necessitate surgery. 2. Describe the orthodontic principles that precede surgical treatment. 3. Demonstrate the surgical principles involved in cleft orthognathic surgery and how to avoid common pitfalls particular to cleft orthognathic surgery. 4. Anticipate when dentoalveolar distraction can help in the treatment of problems not easily treated with conventional orthognathic techniques. SUMMARY: This CME article covers the basic multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of patients requiring a combined orthodontic orthognathic approach to their skeletally based malocclusion. The dentoskeletal abnormalities are described for these patients, as are the fundamental orthodontic principles in the presurgical treatment of these patients. The basic surgical principles are discussed in general, and the reader is provided with advice on avoiding common pitfalls. Specific attention is given to the more recent advances in dentoalveolar distraction in cases of large defects that would have been difficult to treat using conventional orthognathic surgery. Videos are provided to illustrate the general principles in treating the cleft orthognathic patient and to illustrate the treatment of large defects using dentoalveolar distraction.     

Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years

Since its introduction in 1992, endoscopic brow lift has gained tremendous recognition because it has been promoted as a novel technique to correct brow ptosis as well as glabella rhytids in a minimally invasive manner with fewer complications than the classic coronal brow lift method. In this retrospective study, 628 endoscopic brow lift procedures performed over a 5-year period (1997-2001) at Manhattan Eye Ear and Throat Hospital were reviewed. The number of endoscopic brow lift procedures performed at this institution has declined 70 percent. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the causes of this striking trend by soliciting the opinions of 21 New York plastic surgeons on their current brow ptosis management. The response rate was 84 percent (21 of 25 surgeons contacted). Currently, 25 percent of the interviewed plastic surgeons perform endoscopic brow lift regularly, 50 percent of the plastic surgeons perform endoscopic brow lift occasionally, and 25 percent of the participants no longer perform endoscopic brow lift. While most patients (70 percent) were satisfied with their results, only 50 percent of the plastic surgeons were pleased with the long-term results (after more than 2 years of follow-up). Observed postsurgical complications of endoscopic brow lift included alopecia, hairline changes, infected hardware, brow asymmetry requiring surgical revision, prolonged forehead/brow paresthesia, frontal branch nerve paralysis, and scalp dysesthesia. These complications were similar to those resulting from open brow lifts. Seventy-one percent of the surveyed New York plastic surgeons routinely administered botulinum toxin type A (Botox) within 6 months of the endoscopic brow lift procedure. Possible explanations for the decline in the overall number of endoscopic brow lift procedures include the following: (1) the selection criteria for the ideal endoscopic brow lift patients are currently more limited; (2) other techniques equal or surpass endoscopic brow lift in effectiveness and predictability; and (3) endoscopic brow lift is ineffective in the majority of patients. There is no single superior surgical procedure for brow ptosis management available at this time.     

National plastic surgery survey: face lift techniques and complications

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in technique and philosophy of face lifting, associated procedures, and the incidence and management of complications. Surveys were sent to 3800 members of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ASPRS); 570 surveys (15 percent) were returned. Numerous very specific technique and philosophy questions were asked. Details of demographics, techniques, incidence of complications, management of complications, and basic philosophy are presented. Three basic conclusions can be gleaned from this study: (1) Surgeons perform more tried and true methods of aesthetic surgery, rather than the many new methods that seem to get the most attention in the media and at the meetings. (2) It seems that less-experienced surgeons tend to be generally more conservative in their approach to aesthetic surgery. (3) Complication rates reported by the plastic surgery community at large coincide with previous complication rates, as outlined in other nonsurvey studies. The authors expect to report additional data from the survey--on brow surgery (part II) and facility and ancillary procedures (part III)--in forthcoming publications.     

Vertical versus Wise pattern breast reduction: patient satisfaction, revision rates, and complications

A prospective, randomized study was designed to compare the outcome of inferior pedicle/Wise pattern reduction (group I) with medial pedicle/vertical pattern reduction (group II) in moderate resections averaging 500 g per breast. There were 105 women in group I and 103 women in group II. All surgical procedures were performed by the same plastic surgeon. Patient information recorded included age, body mass index, type of surgery, weight of specimen, need for surgical revision, and complications. Six months postoperatively the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire, which rated their satisfaction with the surgical outcome. The questionnaire used a 10-point response format ranging from very disappointed (score of 1) to very pleased (score of 10). The results demonstrated that there was no significant difference between the groups in age (31 +/- 12 versus 29 +/- 13 years), body mass index (26 +/- 4 versus 27 +/- 5), and amount of tissue excised (553 +/- 203 g versus 548 +/- 205 g). Group I required no surgical revisions, but in group II revisions for dog-ears were required in 11 percent. The rate of other complications was similar in both groups. Patients' evaluations of breast size, shape, symmetry, nipple sensation, symptom relief, ease of brassiere/clothing fitting, and overall satisfaction were not significantly different. The vertical mammaplasty was ranked significantly (p < 0.05) higher by patients in regard to scars (6 +/- 2 versus 3 +/- 3) and overall aesthetic results (8 +/- 1 versus 6 +/- 3). In the management of moderate macromastia, this study indicates that patients who have a vertical reduction are less disappointed with the scars but require a significantly higher rate of surgical revisions compared with patients who have a Wise pattern reduction.     

Acute burns

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the pathophysiology of burn injury. 2. Identify patient criteria for transfer to a burn center. 3. Calculate burn size and resuscitation requirements. 4. Treat inhalation injury in the acute setting. 5. Describe treatment options for burn injuries. 6. Describe preoperative selection, intraoperative procedures, and postoperative protocols for patients who require surgical care for their burn injuries. 7. Understand the survival and functional outcomes of burn injury. SUMMARY: The review article summarizes basic issues in the treatment of acute burn injury as practiced in 2008. The pathophysiology, treatment options, and expected outcomes for an acute burn are described and discussed. Special attention is directed to the nonoperative and surgical management of small to moderate-size burns that might be treated by the practicing plastic surgeon.