贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的:观察贝伐珠单抗联合化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效、安全性及影像学改变。方法:对2007年至2014年于我院治疗的晚期NSNSCLC(非鳞非小细胞肺癌non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer)患者,给予贝伐珠单抗(15 mg/kg或7.5mg/kg)联合化疗(紫杉醇175 mg/m~2,d1,卡铂AUC=5或6,d1,q3 w)6周期及贝伐珠单抗维持治疗(15 mg/kg或7.5 mg/kg,d1,q3w)。观察疗效、不良反应、肺部病灶空洞改变的情况、恶性胸腔积液的治疗效果及部分患者EGFR、KRAS基因突变状况。结果:共观察26例患者,均接受贝伐珠单抗联合化疗,17例行贝伐珠单抗维持治疗。部分缓解(partial response,PR)、疾病稳定(stable disease,SD)、疾病进展(disease progression,PD)率分别为53.8%、42.3%、3.8%。中位无进展生存期(progression free survival,PFS)为11.0个月,中位总生存期(overall survival,OS)达25.8个月。26例患者中15.4%治疗后病变发生空洞改变,空洞组的2年、3年生存率略高于无空洞组,但无统计学差异(P值分别为0.586、0.509)。13例患者伴有恶性胸腔积液,胸腔积液的疾病控制率为100%。11例患者标本可进行EGFR基因检测,敏感突变占36.4%,未突变占63.6%。对10例患者标本行KRAS基因检测,均为突变阴性。不良反应包括骨髓抑制、消化道反应、鼻衄、咯血、高血压、蛋白尿等。大多数不良反应程度较轻,可控制。结论:贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗晚期NSNSCLC患者疗效确切,副反应可耐受,控制恶性胸腔积液效果较好。肺部病灶空洞改变的临床意义有待进一步研究。     

香菇多糖联合TA方案化疗治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床观察

目的:观察香菇多糖联合TA方案(紫杉醇、阿霉素)治疗晚期乳腺癌患者的近期疗效及毒副反应。方法:将确诊为Ⅳ期的52例乳腺癌患者随机分为对照组及治疗组,两组均采用TA方案化疗,治疗组加用香菇多糖,观察两组近期疗效及毒副反应,计算和比较两组治疗前后的CD4+/CD8+值。结果:治疗组及对照组的治疗总有效率分别为67.86%、62.50%,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组的生活质量(Karnofsky评分)改善率分别为71.43%和41.67%,治疗组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后CD4+及CD8+细胞绝对计数均较治疗前下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组CD4+/CD8+值上升,但与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),对照组CD4+/CD8+值较治疗前下降,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗后CD4+/CD8+值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组毒副反应较对照组明显减轻(P<0.05)。结论:香菇多糖联合TA化疗方案能有效改善晚期乳腺癌患者的生存质量、调节免疫力并减轻毒副反应。     

新辅助化疗配合手术治疗中晚期乳腺癌的临床效果分析

目的:观察新辅助化疗配合手术治疗中晚期乳腺癌的临床效果,为临床研究提供参考。方法:选取我院2009年5月-2011年4月收治的中晚期乳腺癌患者107例,根据治疗方法的不同,将患者分为新辅助化疗组和对照组。新辅助化疗组采取术前辅助化疗,而对照组术前不接受化疗。观察新辅助化疗组患者的近期临床疗效、毒副反应发生率;比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量等;术后随访三年,记录两组患者的肿瘤局部复发率及远处转移率。结果:新辅助化疗组患者治疗的总有效率为79.66%,毒副反应的发生率为33.89%;新辅助化疗组的平均手术时间、术中出血量均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。新辅助化疗组患者的局部复发率为5.08%,远处转移率为6.78%;对照组患者局部复发率为12.50%,远处转移率为18.75%。新辅助化疗组患者的肿瘤复发转移率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:在中晚期乳腺癌的临床治疗中,术前对患者实施新辅助化疗具有明显的效果,患者近期疗效良好,毒副反应可耐受,且手术后的复发转移率相对较低,值得推广应用。     

康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效

目的:探讨康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效。方法:选择我院60例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,按随机数字表法平均分为两组各30例,两组患者均给予NP化疗方案治疗,研究组患者在此基础上联合康莱特注射液治疗。比较两组患者近期治疗疗效、生活质量Karnofsky评分、1年生存率、中位生存时间、平均生存时间以及毒副反应发生情况。结果:研究组患者近期治疗有效率为53.3%,明显高于对照组33.3%,比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=4.12,P0.05);研究组患者治疗后生活质量Karnofsky评分好转率为66.7%,明显高于对照组36.7%,比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=5.41,P0.05);研究组患者经治疗后1年生存率、中位生存时间和平均生存时间分别为60.0%、15.0个月和(11.0±5.1)个月,均明显高于对照组30.0%、9.0个月和(5.9±4.8)个月,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=5.45,t=5.24,6.12,P0.05);研究组患者治疗过程毒副反应恶心呕吐及白细胞下降发生率均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(X2=4.27,5.08,P0.05)。结论:康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效显著,可明显改善患者生活质量,降低毒副反应发生率,值得临床推广应用。     

Phase I Clinical Trial of Fibronectin CH296-Stimulated T Cell Therapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that less-differentiated T cells are ideal for adoptive T cell transfer therapy (ACT) and that fibronectin CH296 (FN-CH296) together with anti-CD3 resulted in cultured cells that contain higher amounts of less-differentiated T cells. In this phase I clinical trial, we build on these prior results by assessing the safety and efficacy of FN-CH296 stimulated T cell therapy in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods

Patients underwent fibronectin CH296-stimulated T cell therapy up to six times every two weeks and the safety and antitumor activity of the ACT were assessed. In order to determine immune function, whole blood cytokine levels and the number of peripheral regulatory T cells were analyzed prior to ACT and during the follow up.

Results

Transferred cells contained numerous less-differentiated T cells greatly represented by CD27+CD45RA+ or CD28+CD45RA+ cell, which accounted for approximately 65% and 70% of the total, respectively. No ACT related severe or unexpected toxicities were observed. The response rate among patients was 22.2% and the disease control rate was 66.7%.

Conclusions

The results obtained in this phase I trial, indicate that FN-CH296 stimulated T cell therapy was very well tolerated with a level of efficacy that is quite promising. We also surmise that expanding T cell using CH296 is a method that can be applied to other T- cell-based therapies.

Trial Registration

UMIN UMIN000001835     

DCs-CIK细胞免疫治疗联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察

目的:探讨树突状细胞(DCs)和细胞因子诱导的杀伤(CIK)细胞免疫治疗联合化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗效果。方法:将我院2012年2月到2014年2月就诊的72例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为对照组(n=36,单纯化疗组)和实验组(n=36,DCs-CIK细胞免疫联合化疗组)。比较两组患者治疗后的疗效、治疗前后免疫功能,并运用Kamofsky(KPS)评分来评估两组患者治疗后生活质量的改善情况。结果:实验组的疾病控制率(DCR)77.78%显著高于对照组的52.78%(P0.05)。治疗后实验组患者外周血CD3+、CD8+及NK细胞所占的比值较治疗前均上升显著(P0.05);治疗后对照组患者外周血CD3+、CD8+及NK细胞所占的比值较治疗前下降显著(P0.05)。治疗后实验组KPS评分提高率明显高于对照组(P0.05)。结论:DCs-CIK细胞免疫联合化疗能够提高晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的DCR,且显著改善患者的免疫功能和生活质量。     

The Facilitating Role of Chemotherapy in the Palliative Phase of Cancer: Qualitative Interviews with Advanced Cancer Patients

Objective

To explore the extent to which patients have a directing role in decisions about chemotherapy in the palliative phase of cancer and (want to) anticipate on the last stage of life.

Design

Qualitative interview study.

Methods

In depth-interviews with 15 patients with advanced colorectal or breast cancer at the medical oncology department in a Dutch teaching hospital; interviews were analysed following the principles of thematic content-analysis.

Results

All patients reported to know that the chemotherapy they received was with palliative intent. Most of them did not express the wish for information about (other) treatment options and put great trust in their physicians’ treatment advice. The more patients were aware of the severity of their disease, the more they seemed to ‘live their life’ in the present and enjoy things besides having cancer. Such living in the present seemed to be facilitated by the use of chemotherapy. Patients often considered the ‘chemotherapy-free period’ more stressful than periods when receiving chemotherapy despite their generally improved physical condition. Chemotherapy (regardless of side-effects) seemed to shift patients’ attention away from the approaching last stage of life. Interestingly, although patients often discussed advance care planning, they were reluctant to bring on end-of-life issues that bothered them at that specific moment. Expressing real interest in people ‘as a person’ was considered an important element of appropriate care.

Conclusions

Fearing their approaching death, patients deliberately focus on living in the present. Active (chemotherapy) treatment facilitates this focus, regardless of the perceived side-effects. However, if anxiety for what lies ahead is the underlying reason for treatment, efforts should be made in assisting patients to find other ways to cope with this fear. Simultaneously, such an approach may reduce the use of burdensome and sometimes costly treatment in the last stage of life.     

静脉联合腹腔热灌注化疗对老年复发卵巢癌的临床效果

目的:对比分析静脉联合腹腔热灌注化疗与全身静脉化疗治疗老年复发卵巢癌的临床效果。方法:以2010年1月至2010年12月我院收治的80例老年复发卵巢癌患者为研究对象,行随机数字表法均分为观察组和对照组。观察组(n=40)行静脉联合腹腔热灌注化疗对照组(n=40)仅行全身静脉化疗。持续四个周期后统计疗效、不良反应,治疗前后CD3~+、CD4~+、CD4~+/CD8~+;持续随访,统计1年生存率、2年生存率、3年生存率、平均生存时间。结果觌察组总有效率(75.0%vs 52.5%)显著高于对照组;不良反应发生率(22.5%vs 80.0%)明显低于对照组;CD3~+、CD4~+、CD4~+/CD8~+均显著高于对照组;1年生存率(72.5%vs 55.0%)、2年生存率(27.5%vs 7.5%)均显著高于对照组;平均生存时间(16.8±2.1)月vs(13.8±1.8)月显著长于对照组。结论:静脉联合腹腔热灌注化疗治疗老年复发卵巢癌疗效显著,值得推广。     

参芪扶正注射液联合化疗治疗晚期肺癌临床观察

目的:探讨参芪扶正注射液联合化疗治疗晚期肺癌、改善化疗不良反应的作用.方法:本研究采用前瞻性开放性病例对照研究,将69例肺癌患者随机分为治疗组(36例)和对照组(33例).对照组采用NP化疗方案;治疗组在NP化疗方案基础上加用参芪扶正注射液250 mL静脉滴注,每天1次,28天为1个周期.所有患者均用药2个周期.观察近期疗效、生活质量变化、不良反应及免疫功能变化.结果:治疗2个周期后.治疗组患者在疗效控制情况、生活质量Kamofsky评分、不良反应与对照组比均明显改善(P＜0.01).结论:参芪扶正注射液联合化疗治疗晚期肺癌,可显著提高疗效,提高生活质量,减轻化疗的毒副反应.     

Efficacy of Chemotherapy Combined with Targeted Arterial Infusion of Verapamil in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

The present study evaluated the efficacy of chemotherapy combined with targeted arterial infusion of verapamil in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Forty patients were enrolled. Targeted arterial infusion of verapamil was done once a month, 3–5 times per patient, along with chemotherapy. After 2 bouts of combined treatment, the efficacy was evaluated. Primary gastric tumor was confirmed in 38/40 patients, and unconfirmed in 2/40 patients due to adhesion of tumors to surrounding tissue. Combined treatment was administered in 38 patients with defined tumors. Complete response to the treatment was in 5/38 (13.1 %) patients, partial response in 27/38 (71.1 %) patients, stable disease in 4/38 (10.5 %) patients, and progressive disease in 2/38 (5.26 %) patients. The effective rate (i.e., complete + partial response) comprised 84.2 %. There were 31 patients with liver metastases; 10/31 (32.3 %) patients showed complete response, 16/31 (51.6 %) patients showed partial response, 3/31 (9.7 %) patients had stable disease, and 2/31 (6.5 %) patients had progressive disease. The effective rate in these patients was 83.8 %. Thirty-seven patients were followed up, and 27/37 (73.0 %) patients were alive for 6 months or longer, 19/37 (51.3 %) for 12 months, 8 (35.1 %) for 18 months, and 8/37 (21.6 %) for 24 months. In conclusion, in patients with advanced gastric cancer, chemotherapy is more effective when combined with targeted arterial infusion of verapamil, leading to extended patients’ survival and improved quality of life.     

奥沙利铂联合常规化疗治疗晚期结肠癌的临床观察

目的:研究奥沙利铂(L-OHP)联合化疗治疗晚期结肠癌的疗效.方法:选取60例晚期结肠癌患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各30例,对照组给予常规化疗治疗,治疗组给予L-OHP联合化疗治疗,观察比较两组的疗效和不良反应.结果:治疗组治疗总有效率(53.3％)显著高于对照组(36.7％)(P＜0.05);治疗组中初治患者治疗有效率(63.2％)显著高于复治患者(36.3％)(P＜0.05),也显著高于对照组中的初诊患者治疗有效率(38.9％)(P＜0.05).对照组中初治患者治疗有效率(38.9％)和复治患者(30.0％)相当(P＞0.05),复治患者的治疗有效率与对照组复治患者相当(P＞0.05).治疗组白细胞减少和神经毒性的发生率要高于对照组(P＜0.05),而治疗组出现口腔炎的比例低于对照组(P＜0.05),恶心呕吐、腹泻、血小板减少、手足综合征和肾毒性的发生率均相当(P＞0.05).结论:L-OHP联合化疗治疗晚期结肠癌初治患者具有较好的近期疗效和安全性,但其远期疗效和预后尚需进一步研究观察.     

晚期胃肠癌患者化疗后血红蛋白水平与临床疗效的相关性分析

目的:本研究通过回顾性分析晚期胃肠癌患者化疗后血红蛋白(Hb)水平与其临床疗效的关系,为临床治疗提供依据。方法:选择2009年1月~2014年12月我院收治的晚期胃肠癌患者共85例,采用回顾性调查方法,对患者进行1~5年的随访,分别对患者化疗前后贫血发生情况、Hb水平与临床疗效的关系、Hb水平与患者平均生存时间的关系进行分析。结果:化疗后患者发生贫血的比例(78.82%)明显高于化疗前(48.24%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);PR组和SD组患者化疗前后Hb值的差异无统计学意义(P0.05);化疗前PD组患者Hb值显著高于化疗后,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);Hb水平越高,患者的平均生存时间越长,Hb的水平和患者的生存时间呈正相关。结论:晚期胃肠癌患者化疗后贫血发生率增加,化疗后Hb水平的变化与患者的预后和生存时间均存在相关关系,对患者进行常规治疗的同时采取相应措施纠正患者贫血症状,有利于改善晚期胃肠癌患者的预后,延长患者的生存时间。     

洛铂与顺铂联合吉西他滨用于晚期肺癌患者化疗的疗效比较

目的:研究洛铂与顺铂联合吉西他滨用于晚期肺癌患者化疗的临床疗效,为临床治疗提供依据。方法:选取2013年1月到2015年1月我院收治的晚期肺癌患者190例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为I组和II组,每组95例,I组给予洛铂联合吉西他滨治疗,II组给予顺铂联合吉西他滨治疗,应用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)的生命质量测定量表(QLQ-C30)评价治疗前、后患者的生活质量,比较两组近期疗效、远期疗效以及不良反应。结果:两组近期疗效比较无统计学意义(P0.05);I组平均缓解期(6.33±1.82)月显著长于II组的(5.13±0.84)月,I组中位生存期为(9.95±2.31)月显著长于II组的(7.82±1.24)月,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后两组QLQ-C30评分均显著提高,且I组高于II组,比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);I组骨髓抑制发生率显著高于II组,恶心、呕吐发生率显著低于II组,比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:洛铂与顺铂联合吉西他滨用于晚期肺癌患者化疗近期疗效相当,洛铂联合吉西他滨具有较好远期疗效,且能提高患者生活质量,但骨髓抑制发生率较高。     

Clinical Problems: Hypercalcaemia in Patients with Advanced Mammary Cancer

Hypercalcaemia and hypercalciuria are common complications of advanced mammary cancer. Of 127 patients with the disease 63 (49·5%) had some abnormality of calcium balance. Eighteen (14%) of these patients developed severe progressive hypercalcaemia and became acutely ill.Most patients had skeletal metastases, and the usual cause of hypercalcaemia was rapid destruction of bone by the cancer. One patient with severe uncontrollable hypercalcaemia and minimal skeletal involvement probably developed the complication due to inappropriate secretion of a parathyroid-hormone-like substance by massive hepatic deposits.Severe hypercalcaemia was controlled successfully in 13 of the 18 patients, the serum calcium levels returning to normal and the acute symptoms disappearing. Unfortunately, successful correction of the hypercalcaemia rarely was followed by prolonged survival from the underlying malignant disease. The incidence of subsequent objective response to pituitary ablation was less than usual, and only three patients survived for more than one year after the episode of hypercalcaemia.     

生长抑素联合常规化疗对晚期胰腺癌的疗效评估

目的:观察生长抑素联合常规化疗对晚期胰腺癌的临床疗效并评估其安全性.方法:收集2007年3月至2009年3月不能行手术切除的晚期胰腺癌55例,随机分成两组,即常规化疗对照组与生长抑素联合常规化疗组,检测治疗前后CA19-9、CEA水平、肝肾功能及血常规;分析和比较治疗有效率:治疗对肿瘤大小(实体瘤的疗效评价,RECIST标准),无进展生存期(ProgressFree Survival,PFS)、生存期和行体力状况评分的影响以及安全性评估.结果:治疗后生长抑素联合常规化疗治疗组血清CA19-9水平明显低于常规化疗对照组(P＜0.05),但CEA水平没有差异;疗程结束后联合治疗组客观有效率(OR)为60％,临床获益率(CR+PR+SD)为90％;常规组客观有效率(OR)为36％,临床获益率(CR+PR+SD)为76％;联合组客观有效率和临床获益率均明显高于常规组(P＜0.05).Karnofsky评分显示联合组提高率为36.67％(11/30);而常规组提高率为24.0 ％(6/25),联合组Karnofsky评分的提高率明显高于优于对照组(P＜0.05);联合化疗治疗组平均生存期、中位生存期分别为372.96± 34.20天、345.00± 30.50天,常规化疗对照组平均生存期、中位生存期分别为307.32±29.19天、290.00± 28.11天.结论:生长抑素联合化疗能明显降低CA19-9的水平;同时可提高临床疗效及患者术后生活质量及生存期,能够明显提高化疗药物的抗肿瘤活性,对于改善晚期胰腺癌的预后具有重要的临床价值.     

Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Chemotherapy Refractory Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal (GE) Junction Cancer

Purpose

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR2) directed therapies result in a modest survival benefit for patients with advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal (GE) junction cancer. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) may contribute to escape from VEGFR2 inhibition. We evaluated the efficacy of sorafenib, a broad spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR2 and PDGFR as well as RET and RAF1, in patients with metastatic chemotherapy refractory esophageal and GE junction cancer.

Patients and Methods

This phase II trial of sorafenib 400 mg twice daily enrolled chemotherapy refractory patients with metastatic esophageal and GE junction cancer with primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) rate at two months. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate and toxicity.

Results

Among 34 patients, 8 week Kaplan-Meier estimated PFS was 61% (90%CI 45 to 73%). Median PFS is 3.6 months (95% CI 1.8 to 3.9 months), with median overall survival OS 9.7 months (95% CI 5.9 to 11.6 months). Grade 3 toxicities were uncommon and included hand foot skin reaction, rash, dehydration and fatigue. One patient (3%) with ongoing complete response and remains on trial for over 5 years. Whole exome sequencing of this tumor revealed mutations in many cancer-associated genes including ARID1A, PIK3CA, and TP53, and focal amplifications of HMGA2 and MET.

Conclusion

Sorafenib therapy results in disease stabilization and encouraging PFS in patients with refractory esophageal and GE junction cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00917462     

Clinical Efficacy of Chemotherapy Combined with Verapamil in Metastatic Colorectal Patients

In order to determine the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of chemotherapy and verapamil infusion through a target artery to treat colorectal cancer patients with metastasis after failure with previous conventional treatments. Patients with metastatic colon cancer (n = 36) received an infusion of verapamil, interleukin-2, oxaliplatin (or hydroxy camptothecin or irinotecan hydrochloride), fluorouracil and calcium folinate through target artery using the Seldinger puncture technique. From the second day of infusion, the patients were treated with fluorouracil and calcium folinate via systematic intravenous injection for 2–3 days. Efficacy was evaluated after at least two treatment courses. The objective response including complete or partial response was 58.3% in the 36 patients; clinical benefit rate, evaluated by Karnofsky Performance Status score was 91.7%; by weight was 83.3%; by the amount of painkiller consumed was 80.6%. No patient experienced side effects associated with heart function. Post-treatment, the P–R period, Q–T period, QRS, and heart rate were not significantly different than before treatment. Liver function was significantly improved. Side effects of chemotherapy were minor in comparison to those observed with intravenous chemotherapy. Infusion of verapamil and chemotherapy directly into pelvic tumor tissue can increase treatment efficacy and has been shown to be a relatively safe technique.     

小剂量顺铂动脉化疗联合放疗对中晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效

目的:探讨小剂量顺铂用于子宫动脉化疗联合放疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效。方法:选择2010年8月~2012年8月我院收治的中晚期宫颈癌患者75例,根据不同治疗方案将其分为单纯放疗组25例(单纯采用放疗治疗)、小剂量动脉化疗组25例(同时放化疗,顺铂周疗的剂量控制在20 mg·m-2)及标准剂量静脉化疗组25例(同时放化疗,顺铂周疗的剂量控制在40 mg·m-2)。观察并比较三组患者的临床疗效、两年生存率及毒性反应发生情况等。结果:小剂量动脉化疗组与标准剂量静脉化疗组的总有效率及两年生存率显著高于单纯放疗组(P0.05),小剂量动脉化疗组的总有效率和两年生存率高于标准剂量静脉组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。单纯放疗组及小剂量动脉化疗组的毒性反应发生率显著低于标准剂量静脉组(P0.05);单纯放疗组与小剂量动脉化疗组患者的毒性反应发生率对比无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:小剂量顺铂动脉化疗可以有效降低中晚期宫颈癌患者的急性毒性反应,值得临床进一步推广应用。     

TAC方案治疗晚期术后乳腺癌疗效观察

目的探讨分析TAC方案治疗晚期术后乳腺癌的临床疗效。方法选取我院自2008年1月至2010年6月收治的76例晚期术后乳腺癌患者,所有患者按随机数法分为实验组与对照组,两组均为38例。实验组接受TAC化疗方案,对照组接受CTF化疗方案,治疗6个疗程后比较两组患者的临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果实验组的无进展生存期、总生存期及1—3年生存率均明显优于对照组（P〈0．05）;实验组中性粒细胞减少与恶性呕吐的发生率明显高于对照组（P〈0．05）,两组其余髓内及髓外毒性反应及心脏毒性反应发生率的差异比较均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论TAC方案治疗晚期术后乳腺癌的临床疗效显著,延长了患者术后的生存时间,且不良反应少,值得推广。     

新辅助化疗在局部晚期宫颈癌治疗中的疗效观察

目的：探讨新辅助化疗联合手术治疗较传统手术治疗Ib2、IIa2局部晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效。方法：选取2008年6月～2011年12月在黑龙江省哈尔滨医科大学附属第三医院初治宫颈癌患者120例,临床分期为Ib2期、IIa2期,术前均经病理证实为宫颈鳞癌,将其分为两组：研究组（新辅助化疗联合手术治疗组）;对照组（单纯手术治疗组）。研究组给予1～2个疗程的新辅助化疗后评估其化疗疗效,有效者化疗结束后行广泛性子宫切除＋盆腔淋巴结清扫术;对照组直接行手术治疗。结果：新辅助化疗能够使肿瘤体积较化疗前缩小或消失,临床有效率高达81.43%,从而降低了宫颈癌的临床分期,提高手术的切除率,扩大手术适应征,降低术后病理高危因素,同时手术治疗能保留卵巢功能,提高年轻宫颈癌患者生活质量。结论：术前新辅助化疗可以提高手术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效。